The Mockingjay's rebellious approach…

So, I’m trying a new approach with my Mock Addiction lately. A more rebellious approach, just like the Mockingjay. Instead of taking the Giants as my team, I’m taking other teams, and seeing what the Simulator gives to/does with the Giants picks. It’s been pretty interesting, TBH. And it gives me a sense of how sims like the ones at PFN, TDN, PFF, Fanspeak, and First-pick view our needs and tendencies. It also shows me what those engines think we will accept as trades "from the other side." Here are a few results I got from these 2-round Mocks lately:

PFN: I took the role of the Steelers at #20 overall. They clearly need a QB, and though 20th is a little lower than I'd like to fall back to, that just means that they'll have to pay a pretty steep price to get me to do it. The sim gave us Kyle Hamilton at #5 after turning down my trade offers for that pick (from #20). Then they accepted a trade for the #7 pick in exchange for the Steelers #20 & #52, plus 2023s 1st & 3rd Rd picks. Considering we got four picks—two #1s a #4 and a #5—to move from #11 to #20 last year, that package seems reasonable to me. I would not have taken Hamilton at #5, personally, but I’d take that offer for #7 if I’d already taken an OT at #5. (*BTW, the first four to go were: Thibs, Karlaftis, Hutch, Stingley.) I let the sim keep running, and it traded the Giants’ newly-acquired #20 pick, plus pick #67, to Philly for pick #16, with which we took Charles Cross. So, Hamilton & Cross in Rd 1, an extra 2nd Rd pick (#52) and next year’s 1st Rd pick from Pitts. Not bad, I’d say, if we can get two more O-line studs in that 2nd Round.

But no-o-o-o. The sim took Jermaine Johnson at #36, and LSU G Ed Ingram at #52. Ingram is NOT my idea of a plug-and-play starter, btw. I’ve seen him go as low as the 5th Rd in a lot of Mocks lately. I am NOT happy with the 2nd Round, PFN!

TDN: I took WFT at #11 overall, b/c I think they’ll want a crack at a QB, too. The first four players to go were: Neal, Hutch, Thibs, Hamilton. "I" offered us (the Giants) WFTs picks #11, #43 and 2023s #1, for our #5 overall…and was turned down. They even turned it down when I added 2023s 4th Rd pick as well. So I let the sim make the #5 pick—Ekwonu. Then I tried trading for the #7 pick, but again, was turned down when I offered #11, 43 and next year’s 1st Rd pick. The sim then gave the Giants Karlaftis at #7, and Nakobe Dean at #36. I’m not particularly happy with those first two Rounds either, TDN. And I think the sim wanted too much for a four-pick trade down.

PFF: I took the Saints at #18, thinking they will possibly want to trade up for a QB, too. The first four off the board were: Thibs, Neal, Stingley, Hutch. The sim accepted "my" offer of #18, #50, & 2023s 1st Rd pick for our #5 overall. This is a worse offer than TDN turned down to move four spots back to #11 overall! So, obviously, all sims are not created equally. But it is what it is. The sim gave us Karlaftis at #7, Linderbaum at #18, Penn St edge rusher Arnold Ebiketie at #37 (OTs Darian Kinnard & Zion Johnson went 39th & 40th, btw) and Mich St RB Kenneth Walker at #50. I’m REALLY not happy with these first two rounds, PFF! ONE O-lineman with four picks? Seriously?!

The upshot: the rest of the world—the sims, at least—may not see the world the way I (we?) do. They may not see the absolute imperative of drafting 3 or 4 O-linemen before Day 3 even starts. Shame on them!...

Let me know if you try this approach, though. I'm curious what you guys get...and learn, about how the sim world sees the Giants.

FanPosts are written by community members. This is simply a way for community members to express opinions too long to be contained in a comment.