Monday morning 'Kudos & Wet Willies'
Well, let's review Sunday's debacle -- a 35-13 loss to the Green Bay Packers in our own unique way, 'Kudos & Wet Willies' style.
Kudos to ...
As with last week, when the 0-2 Giants lost to the Cowboys, the only 'Kudos' worth doling out are to offensive players.
• Eli Manning: For a guy who was supposed to miss a month (yes, that's another shot at ESPN's Chris Mortensen) he played remarkably well. Manning was 16-of-29 for 211 yards with one TD and one INT. If the defense had showed as much heart as Eli did, the outcome could have been much different.
• The Offensive Line: Maybe it was because Eli was playing hurt, but this unit played extremely well. The Packers have a good front four, yet no one laid a hand on Manning until the game was out of hand late.
• Derrick Ward: Brandon who? Ward is on his way to Wally Pipp-ing Brandon Jacobs. Subbing for the injured Jacobs, Ward had another excellent week. He ran 15 times for 90 yards and caught four passes for another 35. Even when Jacobs returns Ward is showing he deserves to play.
Wet Willies to ...
It would be appropriate to give one giant 'Wet Willie' to the entire defense. Lord knows, it would be a deserved 'honor.' Yet, that is too easy. Let's break this down and spread the glory a little more directly.
• Steve Spagnuolo: The new defensive coordinator was supposed to cure the defensive ills that plagued the Giants the past couple of seasons under the deposed Tim Lewis. To put it mildly, so far that is not happening.
Spagnuolo's defenders might be trying to play aggressively, but it's hard to tell. None of them seem to have any idea where they are supposed to be, and no one seems able to make a play.
'Spags' had better find a way to fix this mess, or this season will quickly become a disaster.
• The Entire Defense: Cancel what I said about not giving the entire defense a 'Wet Willie.' The reality is, there is no way to single out specific players or a specific group. Right now, the whole unit stinks!
The Giants' pass rush, if you can call it that, doesn't seem to be able to get within the same area code as the opposing quarterback.
When it comes to linebackers, other than middle linebacker Antonio Pierce the Giants might just as well line up a pair of cardboard cutouts on the outside. So far that's about how helpful Mathias Kiwanuka, Kawika Mitchell and Reggie Torbor have been.
As for the secondary, we know it is good at one thing -- chasing wide open receivers from behind. Through the first two weeks of the season that is pretty much all we have seen them do -- unless, of course, you want to try and count all tackles they have also missed.
• Amani Toomer: After 12 seasons in the league you would think Toomer would know how to keep his emotions in check. Yet, there he was in the second quarter with the Giants inside the Packers 10-yard line taking an absolutely stupid unsportsmanlike conduct penalty and killing the Giants' shot at a touchdown.
• Jeremy Shockey: The Giants tight end makes this list for the same reason as Toomer. The dumb-ass penalty he took for spiking the ball after a reception cost the Giants a first down inside Green Bay's 20 was bad enough. Telling reporters after the game "that's the way I play" made it even worse. Yeah, great, play in a way that costs your team points. Then drop a ball inside the 5 when you could have atoned for it. It won't be long now before he is whining about not getting enough passes thrown his way. I can't wait!
• Ahmad Bradshaw: Umm, maybe John Madden was right about Bradshaw after all. After watching Bradshaw fumble a kickoff return last week Madden said the Giants had better find somebody else to do that job. He fumbled another one Sunday, and as much as I like the rookie from Marshall I am starting to think Madden is right. You can't keep putting the ball on the ground.
0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
The most disappointing
by george cronin on Sep 17, 2007 6:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Rally around Coughlin?
You weren't serious, right?
by Josh on Sep 17, 2007 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was ugly
As for the dumb penalties, I'll give Toomer the benefit of the doubt because that is the 1st time I've ever seen him do that. But when is Shockey going to grow up? Jesus man, is he really that dumb?
by potroast on Sep 17, 2007 8:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
good point about antonio pierce
by DieEaglesDie on Sep 17, 2007 9:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
defense
by bk0831 on Sep 17, 2007 9:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Coughlin and staff
by bk0831 on Sep 17, 2007 9:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Our Defense Stinks
P.S. maybe the team could bring in someone to teach tackling to the D, it would be a good first remedial step.
by big blue wrecking crew on Sep 17, 2007 9:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Defense (or lack thereof)
To sum it up in quick fashion, our defense has more holes in it than my 20 - year - old cast net.
What I heard described about the new defensive scheme in the early goings versus what I have seen the past two games - well, let's just say there's a slight discrepancy between the two.
Sadly, I fear that this can't be fixed. When opposing teams can line up, throw at will, and successfully run on you - you're toast.
I guess the best we can do is scrape off the burnt part and try again next week.
Man, we are in for a long season.
by GAgiantfan on Sep 17, 2007 9:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Potroast, bilohut, wrecking crew, GA
- Yes, Shockey is that dumb.
- No, I never saw it coming. I thought for sure we'd make the playoffs. Right now, that seems delusional.
- As for the linebackers, I believe that Mitchell's playing in a new position and had the repuation of not being able to cover. Two out of three at new spots could be disastrous. Calls for patience, but for how long?
- Yes, indeed, a long season. Maybe the commentator who said TC would be gone by Dec. had it right. If so, Reese might look for opportunites to unload some of the team's more talented problem children for high future draft picks.
by george cronin on Sep 17, 2007 10:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreeing with everybody
by Ed Valentine on Sep 17, 2007 10:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Shockey is that guy..
by scudagc on Sep 17, 2007 10:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's funny
by Ed Valentine on Sep 17, 2007 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
in defense of Shockey
by bk0831 on Sep 17, 2007 11:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Intersesting observation
by big blue wrecking crew on Sep 17, 2007 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stupid rule
by Ed Valentine on Sep 17, 2007 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree
by potroast on Sep 17, 2007 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think the penalty
by george cronin on Sep 17, 2007 11:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Favre had a spike too
by bk0831 on Sep 17, 2007 12:54 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Spagnuolo
The Eagles system starts with the secondary. They've drafted early and often in the secondary and spent big money back there. In 2004 they had 3 of the 4 starters make the pro bowl. Last year they had 2 of the 4. They've had nickel corners like Al Harris and Rod Hood go elsewhere to become starters and pro bowlers. Jim Johnson routinely leaves those guys out an island with his blitz packages. Without that kind of secondary you simply can not run the system Jim Johnson runs. Just look at what the Eagles have done personnel wise. They haven't spent big money on linebackers, they have spent money on defensive ends but frankly their best ends who get the most playing time are basically a 5th round pick in Trent Cole and a undrafted free agent in Juqua Thomas. The last few years they've drafted high on the defensive line, but that's only because they've had their secondary set. The Giants are built the opposite way.
So on one hand you can clearly blame Spagnuolo. He's trying to run a system that he knows he doesn't have the personnel to run. That said, how much can you blame him if they hired him to run a certain system and didn't give him the guys he needs to run it?
by JasonB on Sep 17, 2007 1:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Spags
by Ed Valentine on Sep 17, 2007 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
a question
by Greenpoint Ian on Sep 17, 2007 1:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mitchell
by Ed Valentine on Sep 17, 2007 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Game
by All Day on Sep 17, 2007 2:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Spags
Anyone watching the first two games knows they aren't anywhere near resembling the Eagles' style. And I mean right before the ball is snapped. The Eagles will show multiple blitzers, almost in an overload situation. I haven't seen that at all here. In fact, we look exactly like last year's defense. Totally vanilla. It's not that we aren't playing it well, I simply believe we aren't playing it at all. We are reading and reacting still, rather than attacking, plain and simple.
by bk0831 on Sep 17, 2007 2:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Al Harris
Point is... If you are going to play their system, then you need build your personnel like they did. Like EtVal said, with drafting a corner in the first round this year, maybe they are just starting to do that.
by JasonB on Sep 17, 2007 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
by Ed Valentine on Sep 17, 2007 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Madison
by Josh on Sep 18, 2007 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shockey is a fraud
by romosexual on Sep 18, 2007 12:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Fraud
by Ed Valentine on Sep 18, 2007 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Al Harris
The Eagles had, and continue to have, a really good starting secondary. But as we have seen last year and Monday nite, as soon as one CB goes down, whoever they bring immediately gets picked on (oh, and not having a pass rush hurts too). When the Eagles don't get a rush, like anyone else, they are attacked by the passing game. They go hand-in-hand.
by bk0831 on Sep 18, 2007 2:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















