Potential Giants Free-Agent Target: Scott Mruczkowski, C, Chargers
Linebackers, linebackers, linebackers. Seems like that is all we have talked about lately when it comes to potential New York Giants free agents -- because it really is all we have talked about.
Well, today let's change gears a little bit. The Giants do have other areas of concern heading into the 2011-2012 season, and one of those is their depth at the center and guard spots with Shaun O'Hara, Rich Seubert and Adam Koets all trying to come back from injuries.
One player who might help the Giants on both counts? Scott Mruczkowski of the San Diego Chargers is a guy most of you have probably never heard of -- I had never heard of him until earlier this week -- but a little study of the list of available free-agent centers and guards reveals that Mruczkowski might be an intriguing option.
He is a 29-year-old six-year veteran who has been a backup most of his time in San Diego. Mruczkowski, 6-foot-4, 321-pounder from Bowling Green, has played center, both guards and been used as a blocking tight end. He has started only 14 games in those six seasons, 13 at center for San Diego in 2009.
I am attracted by the versatility. And by what Mruczkowski did with those 13 starts in 2009. Walter Football said:
Scott Mruczkowski barely played this season, but filled in really well for an injured Nick Hardwick the year before.
So I went to Pro Football Focus (where else?) to find out exactly how well Mruczkowski did in 2009. Mruczkowski was +13.6 in his 13 starts that season, +5.2 in run blocking, +3.2 pass blocking and +5.5 in screen blocking. He committed only three penalties and allowed one sack. Among centers who played 75 percent or more of their team's offensive snaps, PFF ranked Mruczkowski eighth.
John Gennaro, editor of SB Nation's Chargers website, Bolts From The Blue, summarized Mruczkowski this way:
Scott has shown himself to be a pretty average offensive guard, and that's the reason that he had never progressed past being a backup. That's a big reason why he started working on his skills at center in 2008, figuring to make himself more versatile/valuable. When he eventually got pushed into service at Center due to [a] Nick Hardwick injury, Scott was great at center. A lot of people in San Diego think he's good enough to start at center somewhere else.
So, that's Scott in a nutshell. Really good (albeit, inexperienced) center, pretty average guard, and better at pass protection than he is run blocking. There's only three real questions with Scott. One, is he worth what he'll be able to demand on the free-agent market? Two, will the Chargers let him go knowing that Hardwick has been injury prone and with no other center options on the team? Three, could he stay healthy if he had to start an entire season?
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Definitely intriguing
Probably way cheaper than the C from Arizona. He’s got good size, and we do lover versatility. Not to mention his last name is suitably tough to pronounce.
The run blocking is a concern, but if he was great at everything, he’d be a starter and signed to a long term deal. Besides, we’ve probably got the best OL coach in the league.
I’d be okay with bringing him in.
if were hearing the last names of offensive linemen
its not usually good lol, so hopefully if we do sign him, he wont pull some david diehl stuff
"I like prime rib, and I'd love to win a Super Bowl" -Andy Reid
If he doesnt cost too much Id say take a crack
But as always, I trust in whatever Reece does. Learnt my lesson with JPP…
Did anyone else notice that after the Vikings signed Rhett Bomar they beat the Eagles? We had our secret weapon all along...
by ChuckyofNorris on Jul 15, 2011 11:08 AM EDT reply actions
Great analysis Ed
But as is usually the case, if one comes in, one has to go.
Say the NYG bring in a FA center ( I can only hope). Who goes? Do they have the stones to cut Sean? Richie? Koets is the only younger one but is he a keeper?
OK, Seubert is on PUP and they keep Koets AND Sean. Then this guys is on the depth chart as a guard. Who goes then? Boothe?
IMO – Sean is the odd man out. It’s a business.
Bring lawyers, guns and money to get me out of this one! Stand in the Fire.
Best guess
is that the Giants will look at the health of their current guys once they can get them in and assess if they have a real need. If they are satisfied with the health of O’Hara and Koets — Seubert is different — they might not do anything at all. If O’Hara is healthy, the guess is he stays and starts. As he should.
by Ed Valentine on Jul 15, 2011 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions
I know all is up in the air
but do you think they look at UDFA Kirkpatrick?
I think if there was a regular preseason they would have for sure but now, maybe not. Too hard to get him ready and they need some quick solutions. Depending of course on health.
All the Giants should play like Mark Bavaro.
Tom Quinn Must Go!
On second thought, let's not blame players or coaches, they are not responsible. The unsupportive fans are to blame.
by UnknownJintsFan on Jul 15, 2011 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions
No idea
I would not count on any UDFA making an impact this season.
by Ed Valentine on Jul 15, 2011 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Sure as a camp body
Peyton May Have The Wins!!
But Eli Will Have The Rings!!!
Skydiving?Forgot your parachute? TUCK AND ROLLE! On fire? TUCK AND ROLLE Got shot? TUCK AND ROLLE Lost your car keys? TUCK AND ROLLE Failed that history test? TUCK AND ROLLE.
Sure seems like
the type of guy the Giants really need. The question of “where does a guy like this go on the roster” is a legitimate question though. Problem with the Giants OL roster is, there are a bunch of guys who are clearly not going anywhere… but on the other hand those same guys ALL have health concerns.
Seubert, O’Hara, Snee, Koets are all question marks, and the lockout isnt helping the evaluation process I’m sure. Would be great to get another guy who can play all 3 middle positions.
by Oppenheimer919 on Jul 15, 2011 12:59 PM EDT reply actions
Sounds nice to give him a look
but how do you even pronounce his name?!
Fuck Joe Girardi and Sergio Mitre.
Good question
I can’t even really spell it. I just copied and pasted it. LOL!
by Ed Valentine on Jul 15, 2011 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions
From wikipedia...
Mruczkowski [merch-COW-ski]
Polish names really throw me off. Kind of like coach K from Duke? Spell it the way it sounds, and your doomed! lol
me too
I was sure Mruczkowski would be pronounced “Smith”
Like I said before, He’ll fit right in with Kiwanuka, Umenyiora, Amukamara, Okpokowuruk, Ndukwe, and the ever-difficult “Justin Tuck”. (also, by this logic, Asomugha should sign here)
His nicknaname is Mooch so,
just moving forward for our sakes we can just call him Scott Mooch or just Mooch.
by Robin's-meats-and-vegetables on Jul 15, 2011 6:30 PM EDT up reply actions
We call him Mooch down here. (Not Scott Mooch, just Mooch).
Some fans call him “Eyechart.”
I like him quite a lot, and as a Chargers fan, am hoping we can keep him. I wouldn’t be surprised if we can’t. He’s not the sharpest center ever, and when he took over for Nick Hardwick, there was an immediate decline on the interior OL as he had less success than Hardwick at identifying DL calls, leading directly to two of three losses in five weeks immediately after Hardwick went down. After that, Rivers took over the line calls, and Mooch just focused on blocking. That went well, and we didn’t lose any more games for the rest of Mooch’s tenure (beat you guys in a 21-20 classic, if I remember).
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Jul 18, 2011 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions
He went IR in week 13.
The Broncos ate our lunch, and the Ravens beat us, because Mooch couldn’t identify or manage late-forming A-gap blitzes. But the problem went away over time; the early playoff exit that year is on the kicker.
An autumn Sunday,
Perched in front of the big screen,
Beer in white knuckles.
by Neoplatonist Bolthead on Jul 18, 2011 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions
I like that he can plug a lot of holes, and probably at a reasonable price...
Center, guard and blocking TE. He could find a lot of ways to get into games, particular with the skill of the Giants line coach to get the most out of blockers. I’d be interested in him.
There aren't a lot of viable C options
out there this offseason, so a guy like Mruczkowski could be someone to keep an eye on. It’s a small sample size, but he was pretty good in 2009.
I guess I would feel “meh” either way, if we signed him or passed on him.
The NFL and NFLPA? They can kiss my ass, OK? They can line up and kiss my ass.

by 
































