Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

Giants' Head Coach Tom Coughlin Knows The Score

Tom Coughlin is on the hot seat? Because Antonio Pierce said so? Nice fodder for some off-season discussion, but that hardly means there is any truth to it.

Coughlin's seat is warm. So is the seat of every other head coach of an NFL team, and Coughlin knows that. In my mind it's going to take a 4-12 season and a whole bunch of games like the final two of 2009 -- where the Giants played like they had already packed it in -- for Coughlin's job security to become an issue.

I don't think that is going to happen.

Here is TC discussing Pierce's remarks.

"I don’t know what he said or how (or) why he said it or what his intent was there by any means," Coughlin said on Tuesday while at the Giants foundation golf outing at the Westchester Country Club. "It is a one-year circumstance for everybody. I don’t care if you just won the Super Bowl. You are expected to come right back and perform at the highest level. Of course in this market, you are always going to be subject to that scrutiny. My goals, my expectations, what I demand of myself and what I demand of this team really is internally driven. It has nothing to do with outside."

I have to dip into the Coughlin-Bill Cowher thing again. I made my feelings clear on this way back at the end of last season, but I will do so again. I ask those of you who are calling for Cowher to go back and re-read that post in its entirety.

Star-divide

Cowher is not a better coach than Coughlin. They are, basically, the same guy with nearly identical careers. Cowher has a slightly better winning percentage, mostly because he began his coaching career with a good Pittsburgh team while Coughlin began trying to build a team from scratch in Jacksonville. If the two coaches switched positions, today you would be begging for TC to ride in and save the Giants.

Fact is, the best thing Cowher has going for him is the fact that he has not coached for four years now. The longer he stays away, the more his mythical powers seem to grow in the eyes of some fans. That, of course, is silliness.

Here is part of what I wrote last December in defense of Coughlin.

Calling for Coughlin's dismissal is an emotional over-reaction to a bitterly disappointing season. A season of high expectations that has been lost in a sea of horrific defense, putrid special teams play and missed opportunities. ...

Sometimes, no matter what the coach does the players he is working with just are not good enough. That is the case with this Giants team -- especially on the defensive side of the ball. To flip-flop Dennis Green's famous remark, these defensive players are not who we thought they were. ...

The Giants undoubtedly need to make some changes to get back to the top. The head coach is not one of them, however.

He is part of the solution.

I believed that when I wrote it a few months ago. I still believe it now.

Comment 65 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Maybe

I re-read your post Ed. the points you made and backed up are undeniable.

I have never been a rabid “dump TC” campaigner but two thing still stick in my mind.

1. TC has had this team quit on him more than once.
2. Cowher brings an intensity to the game that might be what the Giants need.

I’ve always said that TC is a good X’s and O’s coach. He knows his stuff. It is his style of leadership – old school – that gets him into that gray area.

It we keep TC I am fine with that. He is better than most. For the Giants, now, in 2011, I am not sure he is better than Cowher.

by MSP Giant on Jun 2, 2010 7:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Cowher intensity?

I think TC has just as much, if not more, intensity as Cowher. Another trait of Cowher’s that is overblown. I don’t know anyone more intense than TC. He actually had to dial back the intensity a bit for the Giants to be able to win a SB.

by potroast on Jun 2, 2010 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe emotion

Cowher fires up his teams. He is demonstrative. Excitable.

Agree, TC is intense. Wrong word.

I am looking for sideline presence. Right or wrong, Cowher seems to have a fire that TC does not show as much.

by MSP Giant on Jun 2, 2010 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think...

more than anything, this is a case of “the grass is greener on the other side.”

by WideRight! on Jun 2, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hear you

but I still think its overblown. All those descriptions that you are still using can still be applied to TC. Cowher gets credit for being that way more than anyone else, yet there are many coaches in the league with that style.

by potroast on Jun 2, 2010 1:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Overblown.

Right. Think of all the succesful HCs who were stoic on the sideline: Bud Grant, Marv Levy, Don Shula, Bill Walsh, Tom Landry, et alie. In fact, there might be more successful coaches in that mold than in the fiery one. A coach has to be true to his own personality.
 Many different types of personalities have succeeded as HCs. There is not one specific model that defines success. You do need certain fundmental social skills. I believe this Sherdan didn’t have them and that explains his lack of success, not his stoic demeanor.

by blue gonz on Jun 3, 2010 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where was Cowher's mystical intesnsity

when the stillers lost in their first playoff game as the #1 seed more than once?

If Cowher had coached in NY instead ot Pitt there is no way he would have lasted as long as he did.

Maybe Coughlin needs to spit on or kiss his players more. – sigh

by blains2000 on Jun 2, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think that intensity is more for fans

Who was more intense than Bill Walsh? No one

I’ve seen the tape of him addressing the 49ers at half time of a game that wasn’t going well. F-bombs every 30 seconds. No one guy pointed out, but everyone knew they had f-ed up and that he knew it.

He held his guys to perfection, he just didn’t get emotional on the field.

Anyone think that Vince Lombardi was more intense than Tom Landry?

Its just style.

by trueblue63 on Jun 2, 2010 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Against all odds, against all circumstance were you don't have a shot, you succeed
-Michael Strahan
All you hear about is the past, the past... the past is the !@#$ing past, this is the present.
THIS IS TEMPORARY! A CHAMPIONSHIP IS PERMANENT
-Same as above

by Willgfass on Jun 2, 2010 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

What a succintly brilliant way of summarizing every single coaching situation in the NFL

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Jun 2, 2010 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cowher stuck around so long because the Rooneys(as are the Maras to a lesser extent)

are loyal, perhaps to a fault, to their ownemployees It’s tribalism, an almost genetic trait among the Celts. Think of the Irish gangs in NYC. Live in the neighborhood, accept their mores, you’re one of them whether you’re Jewish, Italian, Polish, African-American, whatever.

TALK ABOUT GOING FAR AFIELD!
Signing off for the day.

by blue gonz on Jun 3, 2010 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Coughlin isn't as clueless as some like to believe

Coughlin is a native New Yorker. He knows the score. Pierce didn’t say anything groundbreaking. Coughlin is a prideful man and I think last year really hurt him. He hasn’t minced words when discussing the season.

by GhostDini on Jun 2, 2010 7:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Coughlin

I have seen some comments that players are noticing TC showing more fire and being more vocal at workouts than he has been in a couple of years. To me, that is a very good sign.

by Ed Valentine on Jun 2, 2010 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Some reporters

mentioned that Coughlin was really giving it to the team after one of the OTA practices for not having better tempo. The players appeared slow and Coughlin lit into them. Coughlin is trying to establish a sense of urgency right from the onset and I’m all for it. Nobody can rest on his laurels.

by GhostDini on Jun 2, 2010 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Cowher's playoff history

I see people touting the coaching prowess of Cowher but I recall quite a few terrible playoff losses by Cowher-coached Steelers teams. I’m talking about losses as the favorite. People talk about Spags winning Coughlin the Super Bowl but what about Dick LeBeau and the no. 1 Steelers defense that won Cowher his Super Bowl? It’s not like Roethlisberger’s historically bad Super Bowl performance is what took the Steelers over the top.

It took Cowher 15 years to win the big one at Pittsburgh. Yes. He won division titles, played in six AFC Championship games, and reached two Super Bowls but a 1/15 average is the only number that matters to me.

Coughlin took a reeling franchise and got it within a shot – pun intended – of consecutive Super Bowl wins. Has it all been pretty? No but I’ll still take him over Cowher.

by GhostDini on Jun 2, 2010 8:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Every coach

if they coach long enough, will have some bad endings to their season. The HC can only control so much.

If Coughlin was able to coach both sides of the ball and ST…I’m sure he would. I still can’t believe some want to credit Spags for the SB year, but Coughlin for the way 2008 ended. Spags was still the DC, wasn’t he?

All these other coaches seem great, cuz we don’t know who the hell they are and from the outside, they’ve had success with their team and that’s all you can see.

"What's your plan?? Rob Fort Knox on elephant back? That's the dumbest thing I ever heard....."

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 2, 2010 8:37 AM EDT reply actions  

it doesnt matter...

because Coach Tom will have us back this year!!! This team is going to be one of the toughest hard hitting teams we have seen in awhile!

by BigBlue82 on Jun 2, 2010 8:56 AM EDT reply actions  

I don't know the answer

I don’t know if Cowher is the answer, I have not watched his play calling enough. What I do know (or have an opinion) is that the play calling in critical situations has been terrible/unbelievable at times under Coughlin. Yes, Killdrive is spozed to be the OC but in game situations, HC has to step in. Just having a hot temper, being emotional is not enough. There has to be results. Have to motivate but most of all, when plays are critical, the HC has to be accountable. If the OC is not responding, then either get him to change or fire him. In the end, the HC is responsible for the team performance and the quiting, bad play calling on defense and offense has to rest with TC. If the team quits on him again he should fall on his sword.

by UnknownJintsFan on Jun 2, 2010 8:56 AM EDT reply actions  

disagree....

the play calling will always be wrong when you loose, and this can be seen with any head coach or offensive cordinator. And I know everyone will say that " they did", but NO ONE complained about Gilbride in 2007.

Hindsight is 20/20 people, we have an excellent coaching staff, lets get off their case. We are lucky Gilbride still continues to turn down coaching jobs every year. He is regarded as one of the best offensive coaches in the league.

by BigBlue82 on Jun 2, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Gilbride

His contributions are moot in terms of head coach accounability.

The head coach is responsible for the team’s performance. TC will be the first to tell you that. Fewell and Gilbride work for TC and it is TC who is held accountable for the teams performance.

As it should be.

And I agree with Unknown – if this team quits again on TC the results should be firm and swift. Gone. Quit or fired – no matter.

by MSP Giant on Jun 2, 2010 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yep

This isn’t the Mile High City, not going to get a 10 year grace period. I agree the seat is only warm at this point, but another 8-8 season or worst, and “he gone”.

His mother has a tattoo that reads, "Son".
"I don't always drink beer, but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.
Stay thirsty my friends."

by Great Gatsby on Jun 2, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Oh yeah

10 year in a figuative sense…

His mother has a tattoo that reads, "Son".
"I don't always drink beer, but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.
Stay thirsty my friends."

by Great Gatsby on Jun 2, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bill Cowher is a good coach

And if TC were to step down I would love to hire him. Or, (God forbid) the Giants finished 4-12 like Ed said and he were to be fired then fine, bring in Cowher. But I dont think Cowher is a “better” coach than TC. I certainly dont understand how a so called Giants fan could root against their own team so TC gets fired so we could hire Cowher.

I do have a question for the BBV community. Wouldnt Cowher want final say over player personnel and the draft? If so, wouldnt Reese have to go as well?

by Giants56 on Jun 2, 2010 9:39 AM EDT reply actions  

Wouldnt Cowher want final say over player personnel and the draft? If so, wouldnt Reese have to go as well?

Probably. Tho I’m sure those calling for Coughlin’s head, would want Reese fired too.

"What's your plan?? Rob Fort Knox on elephant back? That's the dumbest thing I ever heard....."

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 2, 2010 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure about calling for TC's head

Know I am not pushing for it. Like many, I would be OK with a switch to the right coach if it occurs. TC is a good coach. There are better ones, or equally good ones with a different approach that might work better. TC is not and should not be considered absolutely secure.

But Cowher makes for an interesting option – and a worthy consideration.

But I would absolutely reject any changes to GM. JR stays. If Cowher requires personal control then no. No way.

by MSP Giant on Jun 2, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Cowher in charge of personnel is a scary thought

I’m thinking then instead of Bomar at MLB we will have Bryan Kehl at QB

by trueblue63 on Jun 2, 2010 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bomar for Commish!

Against all odds, against all circumstance were you don't have a shot, you succeed
-Michael Strahan
All you hear about is the past, the past... the past is the !@#$ing past, this is the present.
THIS IS TEMPORARY! A CHAMPIONSHIP IS PERMANENT
-Same as above

by Willgfass on Jun 2, 2010 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

gotta love tom

of course, I look at the how they do in the chess match against other coaches. Coughlin has made a hobby of out-smarting Wade Phillips (who is not intelligent). I’m also pretty sure Tom has Shanny’s number, welcome to the division. I am a fan of Coughlin most definitely, I like how he organizes the team and I generally like his game plans. I’m not a huge fan of Gilbride but that’s more cuz he doesn’t match my style.

However I gotta admit, this anti-Cowher stuff is foolish. It’s natural when you’re on one side of an argument to try to put down the other, but man… Cowher was truly impressive. As a coach, I really looked at his offenses and tried to model my play-calling to his, because I thought they were fairly successful with little talent and for most of his career in Pitt no franchise QB.

The argument that a coach’s mystique grows from being away from the game… if that were wholly true, Brian Billick wouldn’t have talked last year about how insulted he was to not have received any offers even though he won a SB, and it’s not like Gruden has a new job. Cowher was the Offensive-minded guy I idolized as I was getting into coaching. He’s talented. I love Tom Coughlin too, but Tom leaves most play calling to the OC, so it’s more about team organization. Both excellent coaches, each with their own strengths. Of course, I don’t want Cowher, we already have an excellent coach and I’d like to not have to change anything, but I’m just saying, Cowher is talented with Offenses.

by dannymac56 on Jun 2, 2010 9:39 AM EDT reply actions  

I liked Pitt's offense as well

It was a good blend of smash mouth power running and passing. I also liked how they mixed in trick plays once in a while. I dont like gadget plays all the time, but a flea flicker or half back is a nice chance and gives teams something else to have to prepare for. On occasion we run a reverse, but outside of that the most creative Gilbride gets is a direct snap to Bradshaw.

by Giants56 on Jun 2, 2010 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Tom Coughlin is not on the Hot Seat at all!!!

The Brass absolutely loves him and Jerry and they will contine to provide the resources they need to win, with that being said we have to win and we will, we had a horrible season and still went 8-8…….Couglins program is perfect for our players and city. Antonio was just a lil upset inside when he said that, coughlin is not in jeopardy IMO and this was made clear by mr. Tisch and Mara, they want TC to find a way back to the top of the mountain, he is one of the best HC in the league, Cowher to me would be a little bit of a step down, he is very very good but mr. Labeau has alot to do with the Steeler’s runs as well.

Peyton May Have The Wins!!
But Eli Will Have The Rings!!!

by Blue Gates on Jun 2, 2010 9:49 AM EDT reply actions  

Oh Yea, By the way

If TC goes and i mean retirement because i cant see him being fired, Im all for one Mr. Perry Fewell taking over the position, we let one firery DC leave before and I hope we dont make that mistake again if we can prevent it.

Peyton May Have The Wins!!
But Eli Will Have The Rings!!!

by Blue Gates on Jun 2, 2010 9:52 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm not ready to crown Perry Fewell just yet....

as the heir apparent to the head coaching position as we have yet to see even a single play under his leadership. That’s not a knock on Fewell, just a caution about getting to far ahead of the curve on him. I think Fewell is in an ideal situation, which may be one of the reasons he accepted the Giants job. He has to be competent – not brilliant, not fantastic, but competent. He’s walking into a situation where he has miniscule shoes to fill in following Bill Sheridan and has actual talent to work with. And he certainly has EVERYONE on his side in the changeover. Now he has to deliver. If he does, and continues to do so, he should be at the head of the line whenever TC departs. But lets let him do something with the Giants in his current job before promoting him to heir apparent.

by Cranky50 on Jun 2, 2010 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

I feel you Cranky

but one of the reasons he was even alotted our DC position is because of the way he handled being the Bills interim HC, which make no mistake, he did an incredible job just like he did with their defense, in reality he shouldve been given the HC job but they wanted someone more offensive minded, He shouldve been the next Singletary but now he is with us, so he definetly has to prove his worth tro the Gmen but he has already proven a few things that our HC needs IMO. I do disagree with one thing you said and that is about being JUST competent that my friend is nonsense because Sheridan was VERY VERY competent but thats it. What he lacked was Brilliance and being fantastic and thats what Spags was and thats what Fewell will be…………… also the shoes of a Giants DC can never be miniscule, he has bigger shoes to fill than ever before, he is basically following up a DC that led us to the superbowl and thats no small task.

Peyton May Have The Wins!!
But Eli Will Have The Rings!!!

by Blue Gates on Jun 2, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wrong man...

    Nope, I disagree, Fewell is following Bill Sheridan, not Spags and that pretty much means there’s only upside if he’s competent, which I suspect he will be. I was happy with the hiring and I agree that Fewell appeared to get poor treatment from Buffalo as he did fine with them, but they wanted to go a different direction, and then took yet a third direction when they actually announced their new head coach. I also don’t think Sheridan was competent as a defensive coordinator. He was in over his head and it showed. He may be fine as a part of a defensive team, and as a linebackers coach, but as a defensive coordinator, he was a disaster and the confused chaos that passed as our defense last year was a reflection of that. If Fewell is compentent in coordinating the defense, with the talent there, and the offensive skills the Giants have, the team will do fine. Obviously I’d love for him to be brilliant, as that’s all the better, but simply being competent should be enough to return the Giants to the playoffs and give them a chance at the Super Bowl. Spags made his mark, but he’s NOT the man Fewell is replacing, and really with each passing season, and each shift in the roster, Spags’ shadow recedes in the day to day relm of the current defense.

by Cranky50 on Jun 2, 2010 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

we were 30th in points allowed. there’s pretty much no where to go but up! if he knocks us down 20 slots last season, we make the playoffs. it never pays to replace the man….only to replace the man who replaced THE MAN.

by wilddre22 on Jun 2, 2010 11:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Coughlin is better than Cowher, BUT he is and should be on the warm seat

Cowher doesn’t develop QBs, he seems to run his offense with the idea of minimizing the QBs impact. That runs against everything that is happening in the NFL

Coughlin on other hand, found and groomed Brunell and oversaw the development of Eli

As for the hot seat …

TC runs a very predictable offense, and that leaves him open to very serious criticism. It has been proven over and over again, by the best coaches that execution is very important, but so is guile and deception. TC can improve his offense, simply by occasionally running plays counter to his pre-disposition. Just to keep opposing defenses off balance.

Its not his coaching ability that puts him on the hot seat, its his personality. He must go against his own grain, like he did in 2007, give some power to his QB and OC let them spice up the offense, JUST A BIT, and then he’ll be fine.

by trueblue63 on Jun 2, 2010 10:05 AM EDT reply actions  

couldn't agree with ya more Ed

This guy was sought out by the Giants Brass for a reason.

He is no nonsense, no BS, hardnose Giants style football through and through. and I, like you Ed, believe he is a part of the solution.

A coach is only as good as the players allow him to be.

That said I believe he does as good a job as anyone in getting his players on the same page as him. I have rarely watched a game and said that he did not have the guys prepped and ready to play. although admittedly that has happened. But no coach in the Nfl has a perfect record.

 It’s up to the players (of which we had only a few decent and healthy ones at the end of last season) to execute and win or lose ball games.

Bringing in another coach would set us back at least 2yrs while they implemented their system, and I still believe we are built to win now and into the future. I don’t care who the replacement would be, I would be extremely disappointed the decision….

unless we somehow go 4-12 like you suggested

by Flynner on Jun 2, 2010 10:08 AM EDT reply actions  

Ed nailed it more precisely than I could.

His seat is warm. If we have what is considered by most to be a “good run” this season, everyone will be talking about how much longer he’s going to stay. Conversely, if we stink up the joint, everyone will be talking about how quickly we should get rid of him.
His seat is not hot, nor is it cold. It’s warm.

We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.

by GAgiantfan on Jun 2, 2010 10:12 AM EDT reply actions  

One more thing

Coughlin’s flaw is his inflexibility

Isn’t that also Cowher’s flaw?

My only other worry about TC is age, at some point the grind will get him.

If they bring in a young brilliant mind to help lead Eli to even greater things, OK, but good luck finding one of those guys.

by trueblue63 on Jun 2, 2010 10:15 AM EDT reply actions  

How old is TC??

He cant be that much older than some of the other coaches, or maybe he is

Peyton May Have The Wins!!
But Eli Will Have The Rings!!!

by Blue Gates on Jun 2, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Coughlin is 64 on 8/31

Retirement age for many

Wade Phillips is 62

Most in 50’s or younger

by trueblue63 on Jun 2, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, never woulda thought that

I’d have said 10 years younger or more, just on looks.

by YankeeDudeL on Jun 3, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

When TC took over from Jim Fassel

the team was sloppy and undisciplined. He clearly had to convince players of some of the basics – that team meetings are important, for example, and that you should show up on time and pay attention. His methods may have seemed over the top, but to me it indicates how serious the problem was.
Where are we now? He has a young team (and always will as long as Reese is the GM) and has assembled a coaching staff of excellent teachers. The players, esp the leaders, Manning, O’Hara, Tuck, etc., have bought into the idea that no one is treated like a star, that they all have the same job – to continuously improve, and they are all to do whatever it takes to help the team win. No Albert Haynesworths here. The little flap with Osi last year stood out at least partly because it so rarely happens with this group.
He may not be a great game day coach, but how many coaches are? Teaching, and developing and installing the game plan are 98% of the job, and he and his staff are good at that.
Yes, he is hard-nosed. You want warm fuzzies? Get Wade Phillips and with him the lack of discipline that, to me, is a characteristic of the present-day Cowboys.
Coughlin isn’t perfect, but he is better than most of the alternatives. If we did the kind of analysis of Cowher’s games that we routinely do of Coughlin’s, I’m not sure he would rate any higher.

Mickey C

by Mickey C on Jun 2, 2010 11:35 AM EDT reply actions  

I've heard that Coughlins should "do better considering the talent that's here"

…how about Coughlin developed the talent that’s here so we can even talk about the ‘talent that’s here".

It ain’t like they draft in the top 5 every year so they got a bunch of elite freaks of nature on the roster who were dominant in college.

GM/Scout’s eye for talent helps you find “gems” in the end of the first and later on of course. But it doesn’t matter if your coaches are inept at developing that talent.

"What's your plan?? Rob Fort Knox on elephant back? That's the dumbest thing I ever heard....."

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 2, 2010 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

how so?

LB’s is probably the only position that hasn’t been developed. Mainly due to injury anyway with Goff, Kehl, Wilkinson and Sintim last year. Goff and Kehl are entering the year where they should break out anyway, Sintim is penciled in as a starter too.

WR, QB, DE, DT, S, CB,..all yes under Coughlin. And they just don’t really place a big importance on the LB spot, given that they usually sign FA’s like Pierce, Arrington, Mitchell, Emmons and Boley with a youngin or 2 mixed in.

"What's your plan?? Rob Fort Knox on elephant back? That's the dumbest thing I ever heard....."

by FreeBradshaw on Jun 2, 2010 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

What constitutes a good year/keep TC?

If we do not make the playoffs in 2010 then IMO TC’s seat should go from warm to pretty damn hot.

by MSP Giant on Jun 2, 2010 12:08 PM EDT reply actions  

We stay competitive

Preferably of course a superbowl victory, but we do need some realism.

If we get to the playoffs, there should be no questions whether he stays (unless of course he wants to leave).

Against all odds, against all circumstance were you don't have a shot, you succeed
-Michael Strahan
All you hear about is the past, the past... the past is the !@#$ing past, this is the present.
THIS IS TEMPORARY! A CHAMPIONSHIP IS PERMANENT
-Same as above

by Willgfass on Jun 2, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

knowing how the maras are, coughlin will have to commit treason or something equal to treason. the father quite possibly was the nicest owner in the intire sports world. theres nothing wrong with being nice but sports is the same as business, ( you get what you accept.) i hope the son has less patience than his dad when coachs and other staff members are not getting the job done.

by druze control on Jun 2, 2010 12:42 PM EDT reply actions  

All of this is MOOT

TC is an excellent HC.
That said, his “run” as the Giants HC will not last forever. Usually 7 years is “it”. After that, your team ingrains your weaknesses and tunes out your strengths and even in their best years they’ll play well enough to lose their biggest games.

See: Fisher, Jeff.

by Sfacheem on Jun 2, 2010 12:59 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't want Cowher

He’s out of the game too long. Yes, Vermeil won a SB but when he returned to football the Rams were 9-23 with him as HC before winning the SB. Then he moved on to KC. He did have a good record with KC 44-36. With KC he only made the playoffs once in 2003 losing in the first round.

Same with Gibbs. He was a modest 39-41 in his return to Skins

Parcells twice returned to the game after 3 year absence. He was 32-32 with Pats and 34-30 Cowgirls.

by FrankB03 on Jun 2, 2010 1:08 PM EDT reply actions  

TC = Professionalism.

Coughlin runs a professional program for grownups. With the right guys, it’s a very solid way to run a team, and TC gets far too little credit for his playcalling – probably because he delegates a lot.

But.

There are times when a team needs a spark. A feeling that they’ve got something up their sleeve. Rex Ryan gives that to the Jets. Shanahan may do it for the Foreskins.
I’ve never had that feeling about a Coughlin-coached team. John Fox on the other hand…

I left my swagger in my other pants.

by HughG16 on Jun 2, 2010 1:15 PM EDT reply actions  

How many Super Bowl rings do we have?

How many has Coughlin brought to us? OK then. And I think it’s tougher to get a ring these days than even a decade ago, but that’s another discussion in itsself.
He’s a good, solid coach. Every coach has ups and downs. A lot of what happened last season was completely out of his control. Unless we have another injury-filled season, we’ll be fine.

We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.

by GAgiantfan on Jun 2, 2010 8:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Fox or Spags

I think TC is a good, solid coach. That said, I think the Giants made a big mistake in letting Fox and then Spags go. Giants are defense 1st and then running the ball.

by MattinNJ on Jun 3, 2010 12:27 AM EDT reply actions  

Giants didn't let either go

They simply didn’t fire successful head coaches to promote them.

Every OC/DC can leave for a head coach spot if they want to. What happened to Jason Garrett is exhibit one in get a head coaches job when you can.

by trueblue63 on Jun 3, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lets all be thankful

that at least wade phillips isnt our coach

by #56 4life on Jun 3, 2010 6:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Excellent Points Ed

The Giants have had several very good coaches in my lifetime. The only truly smart one was Tuna, because he got out before the fans could rip him apart. Coughlin has handled defeat and failure the same way… get up in the morning and do the best you can do to make things right.
It’s funny when people say that he is too “conservative”. The Giants have never been as offensively successful as they have ben under the guidance of Coughlin and Gilbride. As far as their defense, I can’t say the same. Spags was sandwiched between two coaches that just were not “engaged”. Hopefully Fewell lives up to his name. I was hoping that his first move as DC would be to make Pierce part of his staff. When the dust settles with Pierce he’s going to be a very good coach, maybe not a head coach, or coordinator, but he’s a level headed guy who understands the mechanics of his position and the workings of what goes on between the lines. He’d have been quite helpful. But maybe it’s better that he is removed from THIS situation… he’ll hook up somewhere… hopefully not on TV… where like tiki, the only thing he can bring to the table is negative insight… that every team has, but isn’t unfortunate enough to have high profile athletes attain a voice to air their bitterness.
Anyway… you will be proven right Ed. Coughlin, Reese and their staffs will continue to do what they do. They identify strengths and weaknesses… remove the weaknesses and build on the strengths.
MSP, I wonder if you were chanting “TOM MUST GO” right after he led the Giants to the first victory in Dallas’ new stadium….

NHL 500... Let the Less Filling vs Tastes Great debate begin!

by JPinVA on Jun 3, 2010 8:32 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm not entirely sure

That AP was being overly critical of TC. The seat is always hot in New York and I’m thinking he’s more alluding to that if the Giants don’t perform this year.

Now, after the first two losses in ‘07, I was ready for TC’s head. But he changed. Not easy for a man to do, especially one who has lived his whole life a certain way. The corp players saw that, and responded to that, and it brought us a SB. And he didn’t leave immediately after. Cowher left coaching after getting that ring. Not the example I want leading my team.

by YankeeDudeL on Jun 3, 2010 11:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Snv30403_small
Rest In Peace, Whitney
Landeta_small
All Time Giants Super Bowl Team
Arqamaca-p218897_small
Congratulations From a Raiders Fan
Hakeem_nicks_compartment_syndrome_leg_injury_small
The Jerry Reese Game! v2012
Nyxlvi_small
Do people not realize how good Osi is?

Recent FanPosts

Img_0245_small
Playoffs Fuhgeddabout it...
1bradshaw_small
Jeremy Lin = Victor Cruz
Jjones_small
How the three man rush saved the Giants season
Small
Now that this glorious season is ova...
Small
Draft Discussion – Which Offensive Players FIT the Giants?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Get Your Giants' Gear

160x600_ny_giants_medium


Editor-In-Chief

Ed_valentine_2_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Small brisulph

Authors

Mike_farley_small Mike Farley

Meme2_small Sean Kerr