Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Ramses Barden


Our receiving corps last year was one of the best in the league. We already know Steve Smith will show up. My expectation for Hakeem Nicks is to have an even bigger year, and Manningham, with improvement in consistency catching balls is just dangerous, especially in the open field. What I want to know is what's going on with Ramses Barden? I keep hearing that until he performs well on special teams, he will not  see the field at wide receiver more. My question is, Why the hell did we draft him if he has to perform on special teams? That makes no sense to me. A 6'6" wide receiver having to prove himself on Kick-offs in order to get playing time in the red zone, etc. is crazy. Tom Coughlin's logic on this sucks. What's your take?

FanPosts are written by community members. This is simply a way for community members to express opinions too long to be contained in a comment.

Comment 61 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don’t think it’s a matter of having to pay you dues. Barden was inactive because the Giants didn’t feel he would contribute on offense or on special teams. Derek Hagan couldn’t contribute on offense either, but he could play some special teams, which made him more worthy of a spot on the active roster.

by XLII on May 11, 2010 9:30 AM EDT reply actions  

roster spot

I dont think the Giants wanted to have a roster spot that was just for a rookie redzone threat (3-4 plays a game). He will be active once he can play special teams a litte better

by BigBlue82 on May 11, 2010 9:33 AM EDT reply actions  

If thats the case then I would have taken Moss off the active roster and replaced him with Barden… Moss did next to nothing last season. We might have had better production with Barden in the roster spot, and use his advantages in certain areas of the field.

by nyfinest314 on May 11, 2010 9:37 AM EDT reply actions  

We moved up

in the 3rd round to get a player on offence for say ten plays a game and contribute on special teams does not sound like a smart JR move – he has more in mind for Ramses.

I thing Barden played at a small college and needs to learn how to beat press coverage and run proper routes.

Once he does that he will become the 4th WR so that you have Nicks and Barden out wide and SS and MM in the slot – now that is a scary foursome.

by G Fan in England on May 11, 2010 9:41 AM EDT reply actions  

he does have big things planned for Ramses, just not in his rookie year. Manningham didnt see the light of day on the depth chart his rookie year and I think we took him in the second. Its not a big deal that we didnt see him a lot last year, we will see more of him this year.

by BigBlue82 on May 11, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

We should see more of Barden in 2010 if Moss and Hixon are gone.

MM played a little in 2008 and his only memorable play was losing yards on an ER in the regular season game at home against the Eagles. The same game that saw Hixon drop an 85 yard TD pass!

MM was a 3rd round pick so represents excellent value.

by G Fan in England on May 11, 2010 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well if you're the 5th WR on the depth chart

You need to play special teams as well since you probably wont see the field that much on offense. He wasn’t going to pass Nicks, Smith, Manningham and Hixon on the depth chart anyhow, at least not in his first year.

Goff or Dillard? That is the question.

by I_Formation27 on May 11, 2010 9:42 AM EDT reply actions  

You forgot to mention that we traded our 5th round pick to Philly of all teams....

to move up to get Ramses.

Ramses is a personal favorite of mine since i watched him at camp last year abusing the shit outta our secondary.

Not that it would be that bad, but my fear is that Smith, Nicks, and Manningham get off to a hot start…..the giants love anointing guys after a good start © Manningham last year. But seriously, if those 3 start hot, look for Ramses to ride the pine…..

Does anyone really think TC and KG will be calling 4 WR sets???? I just don’t see it….

and here’s another news flash…..ramses barden is not a gunner, for the love of god, don’t ask him to do that! He’s not a special teams player, he’ll never contribute in that area of the game….he’s too tall and lanky….I can get leverage on him.

So the Special TEams excuse is neat and all, but it doesnt’ hold water…..Ramses ain’t a special teams guy!

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on May 11, 2010 9:42 AM EDT reply actions  

ugg....the more i think about this subject the more it angers me....

the Coaches LOVE to pat themselves on the back about Manningham….“oh he impressed last year on the scout team”….“we knew he was capable of this”…..“we were really high on him last year”….

but we go out and draft a WR in the 1st, and in the 3rd whilst trading a 5th.

Can’t the Coaches just call a spade a spade….Hey, we panicked…..we took too many guys and now because of that Ramses is gonna sit. Instead of criticizing the man for not being able to play special teams, let’s call it what it is!!!

Like KG justifying NOT throwing the ball to Boss….So he disses Boss and says he can’t get open or get off the line…..why do we do this to our players?

What ever happened to: “Hey Look, Manningham came outta no where, Smith was a pro bowler, and Nicks shocked the hell out of us…..this was not our intention, but that’s how it worked out….we’ll try harder to get Ramses out there….he’s a hard worker and a great kid….it will come”.

Seriously….was that so F’in hard?

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on May 11, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I dont think they Giants thought Manningham came out of no where, they did draft him in the 2nd round lets not forget. it usually takes a WR a year or two to adapt to the NFL, we got lucky with Nicks adjusting so quickly

by BigBlue82 on May 11, 2010 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

either way....it sounds better than saying.

Well Barden can’t contribute on Special Teams and he won’t play until he does.

the guy is a giraffe….Tim Brown could probably block him on special teams.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on May 11, 2010 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Manningham

Was also considered a 1st round talent but his stock in the draft fell to off the field issues.

by wangstu13 on May 12, 2010 2:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Barden

No offense to Ramses or you but I could have abused the shit out of our secondary last year. I hope he contributes more this year but the G-men just resigned Hagen because he can play special teams>

by 7mike on May 13, 2010 7:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

@ andiamo708

Thats my point, the guy is not a gunner. If anything, TC can come up with a better excuse rather then they guy needs to prove himself on special teams first.lol Moss has done nothing on specials teams for the past 3 or 4 yrs we’ve had him. Deactivate Moss, throw Barden in his roster spot, and in the red zone, with all of our struggles, maybe we can go over the top with a 6’6 guy.

by nyfinest314 on May 11, 2010 9:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Meh...

I thought the logic was just fine for not playing Ramses last year. He should play this year and rotate in.

I think entirely too many people are blind to the fact this dude came from Cal Poly. He didn’t have much of a clue on top flight competition.

He didn’t have to play. He had to prove himself on Special teams………….because the guys ahead of him on the depth chart were important parts on Special teams.

So if you’re going to use Barden over these important parts of Special teams….well, Barden god damn well better be able to play that part. He couldn’t..so Barden doesn’t play.

Hopefully he either learns to do that this year cuz as the 4th WR…you gotta do that. They ALL do.

Just keep winning

by FreeBradshaw on May 11, 2010 9:54 AM EDT reply actions  

Free, I don't disagree, and I doubt Barden is ever a factor on special teams...

but I can’t resist taking a swipe at all our “important parts of special teams”. Special teams have been an ongoing weakness with the Giants and while I don’t think Ramses is the answer there, I’m a little questioning of the idea that our special teams are so set and exclusive given their so-so, at best, production.

by Cranky50 on May 11, 2010 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

well "gunner" is Hagen

and Returner is Hixon. Whether or not the team sucks…those are still positions. Barden’s best shot is obviously gunner..he ain’t a returner.

Hagan’s actually pretty good at that. Its everyone else who doesn’t play well to finish the play.

So that’s why. Its like trying Barden out at blocking TE or as a pass rusher.

The only thing Barden can do is play WR..and he’s raw at that too.

Just keep winning

by FreeBradshaw on May 11, 2010 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah but if he is struggling on specials teams, and our special teams is a weakness, why would we put a player that is struggling even more the the current guys in?

by BigBlue82 on May 11, 2010 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

I understand

that certain players need to play special teams.

So Ramses’s playing time in 2009 was dependent on special teams.

What happens in 2010 if Moss is cut – by rights Ramses should make the active roster but will he if cannot play special teams?

The thing is are Nicks, SS and MM playing special teams? I raise this point is that Ramses could easily become our no 2 or 3 WR if he is that good and if he is he is not playing special teams anyway.

If he has learnt the offence he needs to play in 2010 regardless of special teams. Just think he could be another gamebreaker and we might never find out because he cannot perform on the kick return unit.

by G Fan in England on May 11, 2010 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

as you've said before

The draft is not about the upcoming season… It’s about the next 3 or 4 years,
 Give it time people

by Flynner on May 11, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

It takes 3 years

For the average wide receiver to blossom. There are many exceptions of course. But a green kid from Cal Poly is not likely to be one of them. He will have to be fairly productive at WR (probably in the red zone for this year) to get a spot on game day because of his lack of value as a special teams player. That’s just the way it is.
 BTW- The fact that Nicks was as productive as he was as a rookie on a team that routinely sits rookies, and as a junior coming out early, is the reason I think the sky is the limit on him.

by ronjohnson on May 12, 2010 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Moss has produce nada on special teams but gets in on the receiver rotation… If he is back this upcoming season with the Giants, then WTF…LOL

by nyfinest314 on May 11, 2010 10:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Often there are a handful of plays that change a game.

If it’s Manning to Barden in the corner for 3 TDs, and Barden has only 3 catches and plays only 3 plays, I’ve got no problem with that. How many times have we been in or near the green zone, wishing we had someone to fill Plax’s shoes? Luckily our other guys are coming on strong so it wasn’t as bad this past season.
Don’t give me this Moss crap, though. He sucked, has sucked, and will continue to suck overall ; he joins the ever-growing list of Giants who have “potential.”
The time that he actually did play, he did nothing even related to “special” except that he was on special teams. Oh wait, he did do well in the preseason games. Moss took up a slot and that’s about all. Time to suit up and head for the corner, Barden.

We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.

by GAgiantfan on May 11, 2010 10:52 AM EDT reply actions  

+100

Thank you. Between the 20’s, the Giants are as good as any team in football. But once we get into in the red zone (or green zone or fuschia zone or whatever the fuck they’re calling it these days) we suck. The whole league knows we’re running BJ up the gut. We are absolutely desperate for That Guy Who Can Outjump Everyone Else. Hell, just stand him in the back of the endzone as a decoy! How hard is this? He’s not playing well enough on special freaking teams? That’s why God made FA defensive backs. Do you want to do things “The Coughlin Way,” or do you want to, you know, win football games? We have got to get Ramses involved, period.

I left my swagger in my other pants.

by HughG16 on May 11, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I didnt know it was that easy....

any guy that is 6’6 should sign with an NFL team, all they have to do is stand in the back of the endzone and jump and catch the ball!!!! this whole time I thought it was harder than that, silly me

Welcome to the real NFL, not the Madden game.

by BigBlue82 on May 11, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he DID just stand in the back of the end zone

waving his arms, are you telling me he wouldn’t draw coverage? One DB not crashing the LOS is the difference between Jacobs getting into the end zone and Jacobs getting stuffed.

And sometimes, yeah, standing in the back of the endzone, jumping and catching the ball is exactly what the job requires. SEE: Burress, Plaxico.

I left my swagger in my other pants.

by HughG16 on May 11, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

He may not draw coverage

Remember, in this league, it prove that you can do it, rather than protect against what anyone can “potentially” can do. Last year, no one thought our receivers were anything special and it wasn’t until they proved that they were a menace to the defense that they were game-planned against.

by Well-Rounded Cube on May 11, 2010 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

he's a project

much like this years number one pick.

Physically gifted, and a little raw, He’l be given every chance to succeed just give him the time it takes to grow into a 6’6" frame.

by Flynner on May 11, 2010 11:04 AM EDT reply actions  

He was never meant to play much or have a big role

last year, your attention is misdirected, Barden will get his opportunities when he is ready, the real dissapointment was Beckum, he’s the one who had a package of about 6-8 plays designed specifically for him, so this post should be about Travis not Ramses, Barden is actually right on schedule.

Peyton May Have The Wins!!
But Eli Will Have The Rings!!!

by Blue Gates on May 11, 2010 11:06 AM EDT reply actions  

They looked for mismatches with Beckum

But teams were playing CB’s on him so he wasn’t getting the seperation. Everone knows he is not a true TE, so he needs to work on his route running as teams will play him as an extra WR.

Goff or Dillard? That is the question.

by I_Formation27 on May 11, 2010 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Everything is supposed to be a mismatch for Beckum

LB on him, fine out run him………….CB on him, cool body him and maintain position, he just was a deer in headlights last year seemingly

Peyton May Have The Wins!!
But Eli Will Have The Rings!!!

by Blue Gates on May 11, 2010 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's simple.

This is what Coughlin does

1- We draft a rookie. Likely a project
2- Coughlin lets that rookie know that he has to impress him
3- The rookie works hard
4- Coughlin puts him strictly on special teams to test his work ethic and desire
5- Coughlin then calls out the rookie for not making any strides
6- The rookie answers the challenge and upgrades his level of play
7- A veteran is released
8- The rookie then starts.

It’s Coughlin’s gimmick as a coach. “Special teams, first”. Bill Belichick is the same way. People are always talking about how our drafts (2008,09) does not contribute immediately as rookies but most of it is because of Coughlin. He doesn’t like to play rookies and force them into play time. He makes them work for it.

Ramses Barden is a beast, though. Let’s not forget why he was drafted. Barden is a guy with a huge wingspan, huge hands, and very good speed for his size. If he can polish up his route running he will have a good level of production this year

by Nfpdawg on May 11, 2010 12:52 PM EDT reply actions  

T no point during the season lat year

Did I find myself thinking during a game:

“Man, if Barden were out there, this could have been a different game.”

And that’s probably because I’ve never seen him play football before.

I’m sure the coaches know what they’re doing, they are afterall the same coaches who helped Steve Smith become the black Wes Welker.

"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E

by tito (eight and oh) on May 11, 2010 1:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Excuse me, AT* no point during the season last* year

"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E

by tito (eight and oh) on May 11, 2010 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

this.

Barden’s great in theory…but who the hell knows if he’s the answer?

None of us are at practice. None of us see if Barden is even beating CC Brown in practice last year.

Hopefully he’s there this year. Cuz that’s a nice theory.

Just keep winning

by FreeBradshaw on May 11, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

That was extreme

Free I think you could beat C.C. Brown. My little sister probably could too.

But yeah I hope that Barden theory works out. I’m hoping for Colston 2.0

Goff or Dillard? That is the question.

by I_Formation27 on May 11, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's a bit harsh

Just because guys struggle at the pro level does not mean they suck or don’t belong.

by wangstu13 on May 12, 2010 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

CC sucks in certain situations

Such as any type of pass play where he has to cover anyone man to more or zone. As many have said the NFL is becoming more of a passing league, and if you can’t cover, you probably won’t see the field much.

I can give C.C. credit for being decent against the run, a pretty good tackler, and a decent blitzer, that’s about it.

BUT sometimes when guys struggle at the pro level, it does mean they suck (see Russel, Jemarcus).

Goff or Dillard? That is the question.

by I_Formation27 on May 12, 2010 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

CC sucks in certain situations, Yes

But there are very few players who are good in all situations, our coaching staff did a horrible job of overcoming certain players shortcomings by putting them in desireble positions……. CC as a free safety behind a DL that cant get a push…..LMAO cmon thats not even right for a good cover safety so one who is better in the box is certainly not going to do well, Our coaching staff stood around and made no adjustments…….there were games where CC was at free and MJ & Rouse were in the box, cmon im no rocket scientist (yet) but even a fool could take advantage of that.

Peyton May Have The Wins!!
But Eli Will Have The Rings!!!

by Blue Gates on May 13, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

You're right

But CC is average at best let’s be honest.

Goff or Dillard? That is the question.

by I_Formation27 on May 14, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

exactly Free

I am excited about Barden as much as anyone else, but hate to spoil the party, there was a reason he didnt play at a major college with his amazing size and raw talent. He was raw talent, give him time. We should see him more this year

by BigBlue82 on May 11, 2010 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

obviously....our Offense was not the problem

But Barden will help Eli out immensely.

I have my theories on why….which i’ll spare everyone right now, but i believe Barden will be a great possession WR in this league.

I hate saying it….but he is Plaxico 2.0 IMO.

people keep saying throw him the fade, throw him the fade….he’s so much more than that.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on May 11, 2010 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

He might be more than that

But in the mean time would it have killed them to throw a couple friggin fades his way???

by Giants56 on May 11, 2010 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

My concern right now

Is he might be the next Clarence Moore. That would be a huge disappointment.

by Giants56 on May 11, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

my concern is that he ends up the next Shiancoe

wastes his time away on the bench in NY only to align himself w/ a Coach and a Team that will not neglect him….and bang….a star is born.

but i’m such a barden fan i’d sooner see him succeeding elsewhere than rotting in NY….just as long as elsewhere is not Philly, Dallas, or Washington.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on May 11, 2010 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Its hard to watch minnesota, knowing that shiancoe was riding the bench in NY. he is a beast now!! Sometimes a real test is to put them on the field, and see how they do.

by Phillip P on May 11, 2010 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

or more importantly....use them the correct way

we used Shiancoe as a blocker….and he wasn’t a blocker, he was a pass catching TE in college and is a terrific pass catching TE in Minn.

Can he block? Yes, it’s just not his strength.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on May 11, 2010 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

some giant fans have tried to argue...

that while Shiancoe was in NY he wasn’t that good, his hands were bad, and he had a lot of drops…..and suddenly….almost magically he learned how to catch a football on the plane to Minn.

Meanwhile, they fail to acknowledge the fact that Shockey’s hands were actually worse….considerable worse.

w/out question shockey is a much better blocker though….

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on May 11, 2010 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

No. It would not have killed them.

That’s Killdrive’s job.

I left my swagger in my other pants.

by HughG16 on May 11, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Barden will get his time soon.

I know that I am probably beating a dead horse, but The Giants will make him a regular soon enough .

Fan's Creed: (Play well+Win=Praise) (Play Well+Lose=Praise) (Play Lousy+Win=Criticism) (Play lousy+Lose & Bandwagon Jumpers=Off with thier heads!)

by LoNJDTechnology on May 11, 2010 9:14 PM EDT reply actions  

I can't wait for that moment.

I caught myself thinking about Barden way too often last year during games. I’m glad to see I was not alone. I can’t wait to see him line up with the starters in the Red Zone (hopefully this year)…

by Ceezaleo on May 12, 2010 1:40 PM EDT reply actions  

Red Zone

Barden wil get his attempts in the red zone this year. He has had a year to learn and it will start paying a few dividends this season. Barden is also not a ST. Some guys are ST some aren’t. 6’6" WR don’t line up as a gunner, they just don’t. To be brutally honest I would have rather had Barden riding the pine last year, instead of playing ST. A majority of injuries are caused on ST, and I would rather have Barden learning key fundamentals and techniques, then rehabbing an injury caused on ST.

by wangstu13 on May 12, 2010 2:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Why is Sinorice Moss still on the roster.

This guy has been a bust since he was drated in the first round in 06. He refuses to catch the ball when it’s thrown his way, he doesn’t want to return the ball on punts or kickoffs. He can’t play special teams or push the current WR Corps. So my question is with a guy who can’t do anything for you why is he holding a roster spot? Anyone out there who can explain this to me please do.

by G-MEN#1 on May 12, 2010 11:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Thats completly incorrect

every in game opportunity at the WR spot in the last 2 years that he has been given, he has been successful since he has been healthy, as for the special teams thing, he just doesnt have the mentality, you need more than speed to return punts n kicks and he doesnt have that………. He still has a roster spot because he has gotten waaay better as a WR, the issue is he doesnt get enough playing time to raise his value and be traded for anything more than a 6th round pick and he was taken in the 2nd…… He also because of injuries has slid down the depth chart and has seen guys come in an instantly produce and not suffer season ending injuries, so from Reese’s standpoint he is worth a roster spot and I agree because of what I just said……….however he might not make the final cut this year because of the talent and bodies we need on D. For instance we might carry 4 safeties & more LB’s and DE’s than we have in the past few years, so look for him to be cut this year.

Peyton May Have The Wins!!
But Eli Will Have The Rings!!!

by Blue Gates on May 13, 2010 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I concur

I would actually rather have tolefson on the roster than Sinorice Moss. And apperantly JR is in love with Wilkinson cause I see him getting a roster spot over Mr. Moss. And actually if we have to keep 3 kickers again I see Moss being the odd man out. Actually Moss might not make the 80 man roster. We have 87 on the roster right now.

"Freedom is the weapon of the masses."

by Jeremy Pasker on May 13, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm not a Moss fan, but I agree with Gates on this one...

   When he’s been in and used at wide receiver he hasn’t been bad. He just hasn’t been good enough to force his way onto the field in that spot, and he hasn’t been effective as a special teams player, which in this organization is the other way, besides impressing the heck out of everyone as a receiver, to earn more playing time. Part of his problem is he’s dazzled so often in training and pre-season that great things are expected of him, along with his being a high round draft choice, and then he’s infrequently used (or even activated – wide receiver is a DEEP position for the Giants at this point) and is blah on special teams. I suspect if the receiving corps had been as hard hit by injury as the defense, the offensive line and the running backs last year, we’d have seen a bit more of him. That said, he needs to show even more than he has in preseason, and to stay healthy to have a chance of retaining a roster spot. Moss has been stagnant, while the roster has been populated with new and talented players, and he needs ot pick up the pace or drop out of the race. Personally I’m guessing it’ll be the second, but I won’t dump on him too much for his actual production in limited appearances at wide receiver.

by Cranky50 on May 13, 2010 6:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ny_small
Alexander Christian
Small
Video I made of the Giants run to Superbowl XLVI

Recent FanPosts

Snv30403_small
35 years ago today... who had the better set list?
Small
Top 100 Pete Prisco
New-york-giants-eli-manning-bleeds-after-being-sacked-and-hit-the-head-new-meadowlands-stadium-new-jersey_small
Rolando McClain
Small
ELI's SNL TD dances in Madden
Small
Zak DeOssie Talks Super Bowl Ring
Small
NY Giants Run of Champions 5K Race
Eli-manning-banana_small
NY Giants Wallpapers for You 2.1
310467_150290438405726_136978946403542_166605_699112270_n_small
Don't ban me bro!!!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Get Your Giants' Gear

160x600_ny_giants_medium


Editor-In-Chief

Ed_valentine_2_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Small brisulph

Authors

Mike_farley_small Mike Farley

Meme2_small Sean Kerr