A Study on NFL Players and Achilles Injuries
As we all know, Andre Brown suffered from an Achilles injury in training camp last year. He was doing very well prior to the injury and was giving the coaches confidence in his ability to replace Derrick Ward. After the poor, injury-plagued seasons by Brandon Jacobs and Ahmad Bradshaw, the uncertainty of Brown's recovery is especially troublesome. It's been hard to find any definitive information on past NFL players' return to action - until now.
I did some research and I found the Lower Extremity Review (LER ) . It's a newly created monthly magazine that deals with "accurate, practical, and relevant information for the various specialists involved in treating the lower extremity." Conveniently, the feature article for March 2010 deals with NFL players who suffered from Achilles injuries. Entitled Return to football after Achilles tendon rupture, it's an extensive report authored by four doctors, in which they cite the works of a variety of other sources.
According to the story, NFL players have a high risk of suffering from an Achilles injury "because the game involves explosive acceleration and sudden changes in direction." If I remember correctly, Brown suffered his injury when he cut to run up field.
Parekh et al did a study that dealt with 31 players who suffered from Achilles injuries between 1997 and 2002. These players "included defensive tackles, cornerbacks, linebackers, wide receivers, and running backs." On average, each player was 29-years-old at the time of the injury and had six years in the NFL prior to the injury.
Only "21 (64%) returned to play in the NFL at an average of 11 months after injury" and each player had significantly shorter seasons after the injury compared to the seasons before the injury. It should be noted that most people need four to six months to return to their daily lives. The football players studied needed approximately 11 months and even then, they weren't necessarily at optimal game shape. Brown will be entering the season 12 months after his suffering his injury.
Parekh et al formulated their own power ratings for gauging a player's efficacy on the football field. On average the power rating of each player post-injury was nearly 50% less than the average power rating of the three season prior to the injury. In other words, there were lingering effects of the injury and sometimes, they were permanent
To be fair, the study admits that lower ratings "could suggest that they are returning too soon, before rehabilitation is fully complete." Also, the power ratings did not factor in variables such as different schemes, different game plans, injuries to teammates, and tougher opponents.
The article acknowledges that "intense strength training" may be necessary even after the player returns. Brown is a young player and young players often don't recognize the commitment and discipline required to getting their bodies in shape to play. I hope he has taken his rehab seriously because tending to the tendon could be something he has to do for the rest of his career.
While things look dire, remember that these statistics are averages. Some players did better than these numbers and some did worse. Hopefully, Brown is part of the former but we won't know until he gets into a game. When you add to the uncertainty of Brown's recovery, the yearly injury concerns of Jacobs and Bradshaw, and Danny "DJ" Ware's persona non grata relationship with Coughlin, I expect the Giants to draft a RB this year. Whether that RB should be C.J. Spiller at #15, I can't say. I was previously a staunch opponent of the idea but now I'm not so sure. Regardless, In Reese I Trust.
FanPosts are written by community members. This is simply a way for community members to express opinions too long to be contained in a comment.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wow, great post. Some insightful stuff
I really hope that Andre Brown can return from his injury, and not only as a Giants fan because it would be quite a shame for his promising career to have ended before it really started.
- Mohamed Sanu: A Giant in Two Years-
Interesting stuff
Although when they come back, how much is lingering injuries, and how much is just getting old?
Sad to say, but if McClain’s not at 15, we probably should go Spiller if he’s still there.
I never thought I’d say that.
Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.
When there's a WILL there's a WAY
A great reason to look at RB
Not a great reason to look at Spiller since he is not the type of player that we were hoping to get when we drafted Brown (a 6’ 225 lb 3rd down back with solid pass protection skills). At the time we spent a 4th rounder on Brown. Even if that need at that position might be increased slightly in the minds of the Giants staff, I doubt it has jumped as far as a 1st round need.
excellent if not depressing post
the only thing not accounted for is the fact that the ave. age was 29…. 11 months later = 30 the drop off age for running backs at least.
Other than that small glimmer of hope this is not the type of thing we can rest easy about. Much like Kenny, I don’t think Reese should count on this guy being around all that much this year. Plan for the worst case scenario, and any suprises will be good ones.
Don’t mind the Spiller idea… I’ve supported it in the past, but I feel like we should do all that we have to do to secure McClain,(trade up) and look for our RB in the 2nd or 3rd. Anybody got an opinion on J. Best or that beast out of Stanford?
For the rooks...Either or, really.
Best is like Spiller. Gerhart what Jake does.
Spiller and Best remind me of a Tiki, but faster type back.
Gerhart a Dayne/Wheatley/Hampton type…hopefully more Hampton of course.
Given I think the offense is gonna open up, and they need a dude who can make the most out of his few touches…I’d rather go with Spiller or Best.
But I wouldn’t be against Gerhart in the 3rd if he’s there.
by FreeBradshaw on Apr 7, 2010 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions
2nd round
but doubtful he makes it that far
by FreeBradshaw on Apr 7, 2010 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions
i don't know
Spiller at 15 seems a bit much if this guy could fall to 46.
I’m with you on this, I want a cange of pace that can change a game in a heartbeat. We got all the tools to run sustained 10-15 play clock eating drives… we could really elevate this offense to a whole new level with a guy that can break an average play and turn it into 6.
777 has voiced an opinion that blocking is a concern but i don’t know if that is enough to change my mind on having a weapon like this, especially with the rules increasingly favoring the wide open offenses.
Another grinder to share the load of Jacobs and Bradshaw doesn’t seem like it would impact the outcome of as many games as someone of this mold
if Best at #46 was more of a definite type thing
like he’d be considered a “reach” at that point, then yea..Best at #46 makes sense.
But if they’re set on a dude like Spiller, and he’s there at #15…he’s there, you grab him.
Cuz if you want that sort of player, and are banking on Best at #46, and he’s not..you’re caught holding your balls with nothing
by FreeBradshaw on Apr 7, 2010 11:20 PM EDT up reply actions
the point is that you don't want to score quick when you play "giants football"
Your defense needs to be well rested
by mclaren_is_the_best on Apr 8, 2010 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions
regardless
with this kind of study it seems more and more imperative that we take a RB at some point in the draft
Nice info
I must say I too was against drafting Spiller with the 15th pick, but after watching some highlights and realizing that we could definitely use a play maker like him I am warming up to the idea.
I could make a highlight video of Jamarcus Russell being a beast too
by mclaren_is_the_best on Apr 8, 2010 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions
sure...
you could do that..you could do that with a lot of players. But QBs have a much tougher time transitioning to the NFL as opposed to RBs. I’m not saying that I would rather take Spiller over McClain at pick 15, but I would take Spiller over Weatherspoon if we cannot trade down.
Spiller is the answer to our RB woes
if McClain isnt there at 15 and Spiller is.. welcome to New York CJ
Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?
you realize,
I don’t watch any college football and don’t know jack… but in the bar yesterday afternoon they has some Spiller footage on ESPN … this was around 2 pm … damn that fucker looks like a terror with the ball!
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Apr 9, 2010 8:22 AM EDT up reply actions
Haha
I was skeptical at first. But really there aren’t as many holes as I thought before.
WIth Rolle and Deon we have legitimate safeties. The major hole is MLB. If McClain isn’t there, Idk what we do. Probably won’t be a “1st round” OLer, and I don’t think we should take Morgan unless absolutely noone else is there.
Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.
When there's a WILL there's a WAY
well this is concerning to say the least....
personally i blame Gerris Wilkinson….he was defending him at the time….the injury bug probably just jumped from Gerris right to ‘Dre and BANG he’s out for the year….
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
I guess we finally can agree for the most part that we are not "stacked" at RB.
I liked the analogy of Gerhart as BJake 2.0 and I would have to add an unproven 2.0.
Spiller-a great choice at 15
Best-will be gone by 46
Dwyer-I like him but his pass block is atrocious
Gerhart-3rd round I’ll deal with it but he needs big holes to run through IMHO and we may need an upgrade to come close to accomadating his style if not more….too upright for me.
Mcclain-still better off in a 3-4
Gerhart doesn't need big holes
I get that you are probably just jumping to that assumption because he is a big back, but it’s wrong. Gerhart is actually better than Jacobs. He has much better feet and is good at finding the creases. He doesn’t need the same big holes. No runningback is hurt by having big holes, but Gerhart doesn’t need them. Spiller, now there is a back that needs big holes because he isn’t going to force through a seem. If the huge hoe isn’t there that guy is bouncing it to the outside, which might work in the ACC but the speed of NFL LBs will snuff that out pretty quick.

by 
































