Big Blue View: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeff Sullivan's MLB Trade Deadline Primer

BBV Community Mock Draft: With 15th pick, Giants select ...

Derrick Morgan, DE, Georgia Tech.

OK, I have made you guys wait long enough. Morgan is my choice here for one incredibly simple reason -- he is the best defensive player on the board right now. That's all there is to it.

You all know by now that Alabama middle linebacker Rolando McClain is THE GUY I really want in this spot. I seriously doubt the Giants will trade up (GM Jerry Reese loves his draft picks too much). So, if you are on the McClain bandwagon all you can do is hope he is there at No. 15.

If McClain is not there, as happened in this mock draft, I believe strongly that if the Giants stay at 15 they simply have to select the best defensive player available. In this draft, that is clearly Morgan.

Star-divide

I know this goes against the grain of the results of the poll I ran Sunday, in which Morgan placed fourth with just eight percent of the vote. Missouri linebacker Sean Weatherspoon was the clear favorite there, gathering 29% of the votes. He was followed by 'Free's' favorite, running back C.J. Spiller (17%).

I have to be completely honest here. Spiller was never on my radar, and still isn't. I personally don't care how much of a game-breaker he might be I don't like taking running backs in the first round. Good ones are a dime a dozen, the Giants already have several and they need a ton of help on the defensive side of the football. If you can block, you can run.

The way this draft shook out there was only one offensive player who could have tempted me. And that possibility went out the window when 'RIPShea' took Iowa offensive tackle Bryan Bulaga with the 13th pick. After that my mind was made up -- this pick simply had to be defense.

Why not Weatherspoon? Look, no one has to tell me the Giants need to -- at the very least -- provide competition for Jonathan Goff. I simply don't think Weatherspoon is the right guy at 15. He would be a big-time reach at this spot, and he isn't even a true middle linebacker. He is a WILL who can probably play in the middle. That's not a risk I want to take with what will be a very important selection for the Giants. Does Reese disagree with me? He might. I just think there are several starting caliber middle linebackers who could be taken later.

I was also criticized for not including Brandon Graham in Sunday's poll. He is another guy who is not on my radar for the Giants, mostly since many of the reports I have seen on him indicate he is a 3-4 outside linebacker and not a true 4-3 defensive end.

For me, the choice came down to Morgan or UCLA defensive tackle Brian Price. I think I have been consistent in my belief that the Giants need to add help at defensive tackle, and Price is the best tackle on the board. I was tempted enough, in fact, that I started to write this with Price as the choice and changed my mind.

Again being as honest as I can, faced with this choice it would not surprise me if the Giants elected to trade down and accumulate an additional draft choice or two. I would not be critical of the Giants if they did that at all, provided they are able to stay in the bottom half of the first round somewhere. In fact, I love the idea. There are any number of players available the Giants could find useful, and extra picks are always nice.

Morgan is a top 10 talent on most boards, and is the best defensive player available according to almost every service I have been able to find. Price is a very good player and could without doubt fill the role Fred Robbins occupied before his knee surgery. He just is not as good a player as Morgan.

Here is what SB Nation's Mocking The Draft wrote about Morgan -- a report I used in a Prospect Profile a few weeks ago.

Top notch edge rusher that can win the battles time after time with the explosion that gives him the free outside shoulder. ... Relentless in pursuit of the ball carrier.

Played end on both sides, even saw time inside the guard. The quickness off the snap and consistent technique allows him to excel at any spot along the defensive line.

Morgan is by far the most versatile defensive end in this draft class, but the talent is right there to match it. He has the ideal frame, measurables, technique, and attitude for life in the trenches. ... It is rare to come by such a talented prospect that understands the importance of technique and work ethic. If he is put in to a system that allows him to move around and exploit matchup problems, Morgan can turn in to an All-Pro very soon.

Can the Giants really use another defensive end? I think the answer is yes, a whole lot more than you think. We know all about Osi Umenyiora's unhappiness. A pick like this would give the Giants the option of unloading Osi and adding, say, an additional second-round pick. Even if Osi returns, how much do you want him on the field if he plays like he did in 2009? Personally, I don't want to watch that again.

As for Mathias Kiwanuka, he is a free agent after next season. I love Kiwi, and the Giants love Kiwi but the guy wants to be and deserves to be a a full-fledged starter. If Osi is still a Giant (he is signed for three more years) that will not happen. So, either Osi goes now or Kiwi goes later. Maybe, just maybe, both go anyway.

Add to that the fact that Justin Tuck is coming off shoulder surgery and there have to be questions about him -- at least right now.

Remember also that drafting a player is not just about the coming season. It is about the long-term good of the team. And long-term Morgan profiles to be a better player than Price, and to have a significant role on the Giants defense.

For me, that makes him the right choice.

'Json' is now on the clock with Tennessee's selection.

POSTEAMPLAYERPOSSCHOOLDRAFTER
1 St. Louis Sam Bradford QB Oklahoma Soldier_
2 Detroit Ndamukong Suh DT Nebraska soulpower
3 Tampa Bay Gerald McCoy DT Oklahoma i_formation27
4 Washington Russell Okung OT Oklahoma State G Fan in England
5 Kansas City Eric Berry S Tennessee ronjohnson
6 Seattle Jimmy Clausen QB Notre Dame CCE718
7 Cleveland Dez Bryant WR Oklahoma State GreatGatsby
8 Oakland Bruce Campbell OT Maryland Hoyadestroya85
9 Buffalo Dan Williams DT Tennessee The Greek
10 Jacksonville Joe Haden CB Florida jp2y
11 Denver Rolando McClain ILB Alabama NYG_Slater
12 Miami Jerry Hughes DE/OLB Texas Christian sunlion333
13 San Francisco Bryan Bulaga OT Iowa RIPShea
14 Seattle Trent Williams OT Oklahoma Ed V.
15 N.Y. Giants Derrick Morgan DE Georgia Tech
Ed Valentine
16 Tennessee Json
17 San Francisco RIPShea
18 Pittsburgh ross_stephen
19 Atlanta daddyzander
20 Houston BitterEli
21 Cincinnati Woogie526
22 New England Ryan Valentine
23 Green Bay Dan Luibil
24 Philadelphia Bye Dawk
25 Baltimore Larry Soprano
26 Arizona Snipah
27 Dallas pataroons
28 San Diego hakeemthedream
29 N.Y. Jets Brooklyn58
30 Minnesota hurikaine
31 Indianapolis Charles L.
32 New Orleans GiantsReignSupreme
Poll
Is this the right pick for the Giants?
YES!!! Ed you are a genius
297 votes
NO!!! Sorry, Ed, you are an idiot
363 votes

660 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 289 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

DT NEEDS

I saw Cornellius Griffin was dumped by the Redskins. I thought always thought he is a strong 2 gaper…What do you think aboyt getting him and going with Eds pick of Morgan?

by nfl_gmen on Mar 22, 2010 6:16 AM EDT reply actions  

He is past his best

so he is just another body even if he was cheap.

by G Fan in England on Mar 22, 2010 6:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would..

Take Darren Howard, recently released, and Price at #15, if I were Jerry Reese.
I’ve been of the thought that McClain won’t be there, and Price was next on my list all along.

by Great Gatsby on Mar 22, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Price

I have targeted Price too, but, Morgan is 5-10 on the ratings boards everywhere. Price is anywhere from 25-50. Tells you there is a huge consensus that Morgan will be a better player. That’s why I went that way.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

No disagreement..

From me, but I also included Howard in my assessment, certianly would help with push upfront, and I hope Rocky & Bullwinkle is released personally.

by Great Gatsby on Mar 22, 2010 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Howard is a DE tho Gatsby

And he’s OK..probably the Rocky Bernard equivalent of a DE addition

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know...

but let’s be honest, Bernard sucks, his best days are well behind him, would take Howard any day over him. If you go with my thinking for a moment, you have Howard, my pick was Price, and in that scenario you could move Tuck inside in obvious passing situations (ie, like the Super Bowl run)….Or if you take Ed’s pick, still could move Tuck inside in that situation.

by Great Gatsby on Mar 22, 2010 9:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

we are really forgetting, though...

that we had lost Jay Alford for the year. He was Justin Tuck’s pick for breakout player of the year last year. If you remember in the pre season, he really looked like he was taking tremendous strides forward. I wouldn’t sell him and one other DT the Giants have in their stable short just yet. Knowing how important a good, balanced DE would be for the Giants to add to replace the still gaping hole left by Strahan, I can definitely agree with Ed’s pick.

In Reese We Trust

by jmark82 on Mar 23, 2010 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

Last year we had Tuck and Kiwi and Osi returning from injury and we all were happy about that plus the signing of Canty.

Tuck got injured, Osi got benched and Kiwi has not developed as much as we would have liked (maybe due to position switch and back again).

So suddenly DE has gone from a strength to a weakness in one season.

by G Fan in England on Mar 22, 2010 6:16 AM EDT reply actions  

Morgan

Can’t really complain about this pick, especially considering this guy really looks to be a stud 4-3 end for a number of years. Personally I think Osi and Kiwi(especially Osi) are a bit overrated. I think Morgan would be more in the mold of Tuck, a tough S.O.B. who is committed to stuffing the run as much as he is to grabbing sacks.

I Am Tobikan Judan

by buckyyo on Mar 22, 2010 7:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Morgan

I watched some Morgan highlights. The guy is a Tuck clone. Great motor, great effort, plays the run, can move around the line easily to create match-up issues. The more I watched the more I thought ‘this guy is Justin Tuck.’

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 7:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right pick

I concur that this is the right pick here and he does seem to be a stud DE. I think this should continue our trend of stud DEs who harrass the QB and will help the rest of the defense.

by CCE718 on Mar 22, 2010 8:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good choice

For all the reasons you stated. Kiwi has had opportunities and has not demonstrated that he has what it takes to be a starter or that he fits in long term. If Osi struggles again (likely). he will complain again, and the Giants will have to get rid of him – I still think they should do it now, while he can be presented as a malcontent and not as damaged goods, and while they can get something in this year’s draft, instead of next year’s.
Does this pick put pressure on you to go DT in the second round, leaving ILB for later?

Mickey C

by Mickey C on Mar 22, 2010 7:16 AM EDT reply actions  

Honestly, I don't think so

I think it lessens the opportunity to grab on OT or RB early. My immediate thought is the 2nd round pick will have to be the best ILB, DT or S on the board. Fortunately, the draft has depth at all three of those spots. That’s one reason I felt comfortable going BPA with this choice.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 7:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bravo for not being a Homer

I applaud the choice as the non-traditional. I expect a lot would look at this and say “we have great players there”. We might. Osi may come in a year after his knee surgery and be motivated. Kiwi may come in ready to be a terror. However, with no stud available at a position of need (DT, S, OT), I’m always a big fan of bolstering the trenches.

When you can bolster the trenches, and add the BPA, you’ve probably done a good job.

I’m ready to make the PITT pick anytime :)

by ross_stephen on Mar 22, 2010 7:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Recant my NO vote

Ed – your comments about Osi and Kiwi – “lose one now or one next year” – changed my mind. A team needs three good DEs in the NFL and Morgan is a stud.

Good logic. Price is a reach. Trading down if McClain is gone makes sense.

And, no, you are not an idiot. Unless JR trades down, this is the best option.

by MSP Giant on Mar 22, 2010 7:53 AM EDT reply actions  

There was a rumour

that anyone who voted no receives a week ban from BBV.

by G Fan in England on Mar 22, 2010 8:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

LOL, G Fan

Actually, I hope you know I’m not that mean-spirited. I really expected this pick, no matter who I chose, to be greeted with a mixed reaction. The poll numbers are showing exactly that.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 8:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know

It will be interesting to see if you even achieve a simple yes majority!

I think the trade down option is viable if we could get a second rounder.

Otherwise it is looking a bad spot to pick for the Giants.

by G Fan in England on Mar 22, 2010 8:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

I do not agree with the "lose one now or one next year" comment

if there is no cap for 2011 (which is likely) the giants will own kiwi’s rights until 2012 and then this guy will likely be in Kiwi’s current role as a backup who isn’t getting enough snaps.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cap

How is it likely there won’t be one? I don’t think anybody knows for sure, but I believe teams are planning as though there will be one.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 4:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm glad you backed off of Price!

Morgan is an exciting player who should fit our system like a dream because of all the qualities listed above: measurables, versatility, work ethic, relentlessness. Does remind of a healthy, hungry Tuck. We’ll see how the other DEs come back this year, but regardless Morgan could be the best of the bunch.

by SBXLII on Mar 22, 2010 8:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Price

The guy will be a good player, and it was tempting. I just could not find anyone, anywhere who thinks he is a better player than Morgan.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Welcolm to the Giants

Now sit the bench, because we have too many DE.

by lizard on Mar 22, 2010 8:40 AM EDT reply actions  

disagree

Osi = ? (will he bitch and moan his way off the team)
Kiwi = ? (will he re-sign once his contract is up next year)
Tuck = ? (will his shoulder ever be the same? probably but who knows)
Canty = ? (wait.. whos canty?)

we definetly do not have too many DE’s. this is a fantastic pick IMO.

Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?

by Plaxico Burress on Mar 22, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Osi = who cares, we can find a situational pass rusher for cheaper
Kiwi = We will resign him before the year is over, He won’t make it to FA
Tuck = He will be fine
Canty = A DT in our scheme???
Sintim = Oh look there is that situational pass rusher!

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sintim

Will be at the strongside linebacker spot. Let him blitz from there.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not in nickel

There is no SAM in the nickel or dime, so in most passing situations Sintim will be available to stuff his hand in the dirt as a DE. He did this last year, and did it better than he played SAM.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

if sintim not in nickelt then who?

boley of course. but then who else? goff? doubt it. out 2 LBs in nickel package will be sintim, bloey.

Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?

by Plaxico Burress on Mar 22, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sintim will not be a LB in nickel

He does not play anywhere near well enough in space to play LB in nickel. No team keeps their SAM in the game on nickel. It is usually you Mike (if you have a 3 down Mike) and your Will. Some teasm will play their startig and second string Wills. Some teams will play an in the box safety as a WILL in nickel. If Sintim is on the field in nickel it is as a DE. That is the beauty of SPoon. He can be a true 3 down Mike and play in the nickel package next to Boley.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

are you really happy with kiwi and tuck

as our only 2 servicable DEs? so what happens when they get tired? now we have tollefson and some shlub playin DE? doesnt sounds very effective to me. especially if your saying who cares about osi get rid of him, you cant be serious about being content with that crop od DEs

Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?

by Plaxico Burress on Mar 22, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

FIrst Tollefson is a sevriceable backup. Second, Sintim will play DE in some nickel and dime packages. Third, Osi and Kiwi are still both on the roster. Fourth, if you want a rotational DE you can get one for much less than the #15 overall pick.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't pick him

Because I saw him as a ‘rotational’ guy. I picked him because I thought he was the defensive player on the board who had the biggest chance to eventually be a star player.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

osi is on the team this year..

but what about next year? and what about kiwi next year? neither are guarantees to be Giants very soon.

if ur happy with tollefson getting a ton of playing time i got a 95 ford taurus with 250K miles on it id like to sell you for 25k cuz you seem to be happy with crap.

sintim is a LB, not DE and we should want to keep him at LB as much as possible to he can develop. looks what happened to kiwi when we moved him from DE to LB back to DE. hes development is way off.

morgan wouldnt be a rotational player for more then 1 year. u cant draft for next year only. morgan has the potential to be a star for the next 10 years. can you say that about ANY of our current DEs. no you cant.

Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?

by Plaxico Burress on Mar 22, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I never said Tollefson would be getting a ton of playing time. You were talkign about a reserve player. If you want to pay 1st round money to Morgan to be a reserve or have to resign Kiwi at a good salary just to be a reserve I’ve got a 95 taurus to sell you for $60,000. If you want to have Morgan as your starter and get rid of both Kiwi and Osi you are hosing us for the future because we will once again be stuck looking to add a player at DE rather than another need, so you are not planning for the future.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

If were talking about cars

Morgan would be like the BMW m3 in your garage that you never drive because you have a Ferrari F430 and Porsche 911 that are much more fun to drive and just plain better

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

And like having those three cars in your garage...

it;d be a nice problem to have. I’m sold on Tuck, but exactly who is this Porsche 911 you speak of? Kiwi, who is good, but hasn’t really dominated, or Osi who was good, back what, three or four years ago?

by Cranky50 on Mar 22, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Having three nice cars, but having the rest of your house falling apart sounds like a bad plan too though. Maybe you should have bought a new roof rather than that third car?

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

The irony of the fact that the new stadium doesn’t have a roof is just too funny here not to mention.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even funnier

since its got garages.

Its also got a locker room, where said “Cars” will be “stored”.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

And

the cars from last season need a whole of tuneups in those garages.

by Great Gatsby on Mar 22, 2010 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

why would the house be falling apart

we spent a lot of money at the car dealership, but we still have 6 rounds worth of materials to fix up the couple holes in the house.

Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?

by Plaxico Burress on Mar 22, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

right now we have 1 nice car - porche 911 is tuck

Osi is a 2001 volkswagon passat. it was really nice when it first came out but now its starting to break down and constantly needs to be takin in to the shop cuz it cant perform.

kiwi is a 2004 ford explorer. does that job, but isnt the best car in the world.

morgan is the shiny new vett.

Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?

by Plaxico Burress on Mar 22, 2010 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Come on

So are we trying to build the team for next year, or a few years down the road? Do you want the Giants to win the SB next year? Who is going to play linebacker? Who is going to play linebacker? Who is going to play linebacker?

by lizard on Mar 22, 2010 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who is going to play linebacker?

tune into the 2nd-7th rounds.

You can even record it and re-play it 3 times

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

We already have later round LBs

WHat makes new late round LBs any different than existing late round LBs. They are later rounders for a reason.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

MLBs

There is a need for a middle linebacker, yes. It is my opinion that after McClain there is not one in the first round. I will say this again — most scouts consider Weatherspoon an outside linebacker at the NFL level. A guy who ‘could’ play the middle but that won’t be his best position. That’s why I did not consider him here.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Remember your post about not trusting "draft experts"

Plenty of players have moved from outside to inside. Spoon shows the required smarts and skills. Don’t get tripped up into thinking he can only play the position he did in college.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

He has played both

I know that. I just don’t see him as the right player to take at 15. Reese might disagree, and if he does I will trust his opinion. I always trust Reese’s opinion.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lizard, my friend

The draft is 7 rounds, not one. And there are loads of talented players available in rounds 2-4 especially. Relax. The draft is not about one round.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

few years down the road

if we drafted for next years immediate need we would be called the oakland raiders. you draft for next few years. and build a team. you dont jusd draft to fill a need like MLB when there are no elite MLBs in this draft after mcclain. there are 6 more rounds to get other positions.

Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?

by Plaxico Burress on Mar 22, 2010 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right, Plaxico

You want an ‘elite’ player in this spot. I just don’t see Weatherspoon as a natural MLB. You could get Jamar Cheney, Sean Lee, Pat Angerer, Brandon Spikes, Donald Butler or maybe Micah Johnson. All of those guys are considered players who could be starting MLBs at the NFL level. So, no need to reach.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

What's wrong

with Jonathan Goff as our starting MLB? Is it because he’s not Patrick Willis or Ray Lewis? My point is there seems to be a consensus at putting Sintim ( I like him by the way ) as our starting SAM, and he didn’t play much better than Goff at the end of last year, he didn’t even know where to line up. So why not Goff? Given some time I think both of these guys will be solid players on our team. This will be Goff’s third year, so make or break time for him, and I have confidence. As for the pick, I agree with it. The Giants, Reese and Co., always want to build up their lines and with Bulaga gone and Osi as a question mark, who wouldn’t want two Justin Tuck’s on the team.

by KumaBlue42 on Mar 22, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree

I’d like to see him get a chance.

Which is why unless McClain’s there (cuz he’s THE LB in this draft) I’d rather go with a middle round LB, well…2nd round or beyond.

I don’t think we can give Goff the job outright tho.

Getting a midle round LB, such as Jamar Chaney who’s MLB with experience elsewhere..is a better idea then wasting a first round pick on a similar premise.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also agree

There is plenty of competition to go around at that position and it needs to be addressed via draft exactly as you put it.

by KumaBlue42 on Mar 22, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

i love this pick

a) hes the best available defensive player

b) de is more of a need than alot of people realize, for multiple reasons, the trade and fa possibilities ed listed, and also because when we do slide tuck inside on passing downs, we can still have a fresh guy to bring in on the outside that is a huge step up from tollefson

that and im not a big spoon or price fan, so eh, this is the least of the evils

by daddyzander on Mar 22, 2010 8:43 AM EDT reply actions  

Good man Ed.

Love the pick. I’ve said its a tough decision between Morgan and Graham..but, well…judging by what you said..you didn’t even consider him at all! So it wasn’t a choice.

Morgan is the 7th rated player on “my board” so to get him at #15 is incredible value as the BDPA.

Its a deep draft DT wise, so in that 3rd or 4th round, can always dip into it and get lucky. Geno Atkins would be a nice target later on and probably is just as good as Price.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Overinvesting in one position

I’m not burning a 1st round pick, let alone a #15 pick on just a rotational player. That picke better be a player I expect to be a starter by his second year at a minimum. This was the deal with Nicks, and Phillips.

The only way you could justify this pick is by planning to get rid of both Kiwi and Osi, which I just don’t see happening. I have faith in Kiwi, and I believe the coachign staff does too. Osi is the one who most liekly moves along as he is the older player. Kiwi is now in that perfect young veteran age. He would have already been money last year if it wasn’t for the year of position change. That offset his development by a year. He’ll be right on track now. Kiwi will get a new deal this year and be our true full fledged starter, meaning Morgan is no more than a rotational player. We can get depth at DE for less than a #15. If you take Morgan here you will be letting go of both Kiwi and Osi which means next year you are going have to draft a DE again to get back your numbers! JUst how many picks for how many years are we going to use on DEs? I know we love the pass rush, but come on man.

The whole BPA thing is way overhyped too. Almost no GM actually does BPA, at least not in the 1st round. Grabbing that 6th rounder that you really don’t need but was just such a great value is one thing. If you take a guy in the 1st and pay him 1st money he better have a spot on your team. Resse does not do BPA in round 1. There are players that would have been BPA over both Nicks and Phillips, but we had a need at those positions. Reese drafts where need intersects value. Morgan doesn’t fit that description. He’s all value, no need. Reese would either say Spoon is adequate value intersecting a need (Spoon will go no later than 24, so it is NOT a reach), or if he for some reason has him graded out lower than the rest of the world he says there is no value that intersects need and looks to trade down.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:10 AM EDT reply actions  

How do you know Reese doesn't go BPA?

I dunno that he doesn’t.

How do you know that Ross, Phillips and Nicks aren’t the BPA on his board? Kiwaunuka showed (Reese wasn’t teh GM yet, but fought for the choice) he goes BPA too even if he’s got 3 ends already.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes

but why would you go for a fourth End especially in round 1, just absolutely silly

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Morgan

If you go Morgan I believe there is a strong possibility Osi would be dealt for a second-round pick, or maybe a couple of picks. Also, remember that I also said trading down is a good idea here. It simply isn’t something I allowed in this mock. So, I took the best defensive player on the board.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Kiwi

There are a couple of things to consider.
1. If you make this move, you COULD trade Osi — or even Kiwi.
2. If you keep Osi, Kiwi is leaving after this year. He wants to start w/o someone hovering over him, and he will be gone.
3. You need more than 2 guys, I think that has been proven.
4. Kiwi has never become a big-time player. You can argue that he is no more than a rotational player, anyway.
As I have said, when you draft you can’t simply think about the coming season. You have to think about the big picture. Big picture is that you take the player you think helps you the most for the next 6-8 yars, not just in 2010.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

You need more than 2 guys!

I think thats a little overrated, you need more than 2 but you do not need to waste a first round pick when you already have two really good ones and if you can get a dominant interior player the need for 100 spectacular defensive ends is even less.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

So you are arguing to get rid of both?

Doesn’t this move put us in no better position for the future then? We will once again be looking to add another DE if you get rid of them both. That kind of blows up the argument of planning for the future.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not arguing

to get rid of both. Just saying one or the other is going to be gone — if not this off-season then next off-season.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

Osi will be gone, Kiwi has done all thats asked of him so i hope he stays

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

But as you’ve pointed out neither Kiwi or Osi wants to play second fiddle. If you draft Morgan you are saying that whoever stays is second fiddle, or that you are using your 1st round pick for a backup only.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thats fine

I just dont think this is the year to get good trade value for Osi, i dont see too many teams lining up for a diva DE who run stopping capabilities are in question and if we do trade him for picks, what are we going to use that pick on……..another END?? You said you drafted the best defensive player but that may be Earl thomas, weatherspoon or Price at this point….. i feel like there were enough good players that fill a need left as oppose to a really good one that doesnt fit, But i see your thought process.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

The value for Osi would be MUCH higher this year...

Than if he shoots his mouth off and is marked "MUST be moved. Also, there’s a real possibility that what we saw with Osi last year is what Osi is. Maybe a bit better, maybe a bit worse, and it wasn’t very good. Osi’s recent resume if he has another forgetable season wouldn’t be too impressive:

2008 – hurt
2009 – not good
2010 – not good
2011 – If season isn’t played unemployed, if it is, he hasn’t been worth getting excited about for over three years, and he’s not getting younger.

by Cranky50 on Mar 22, 2010 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

They all met needs

Do you really think it is mere chance that that many years in a row it just so happened that the highest ranked player left on Reese’s board when our pick rolled around also magically matched up to one of our biggest needs? I don’t think so. Look around at how all of the teams draft. 1st round players almost always match up to a need. BPA is BS.

Kiwi by the way was picked with planning. Strahan was not going to be around forevor. Remember the SB year we didn’t know if he would play or retire. Tuck had not yet broken out as the big time player he is.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

Again, how do you know that?

Reese obviously calculates something with need in mind for his BPA board.

Do you honestly think he passed up a better player on his board?

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes I do

I think every GM passes higher ranked players on their board when they don’t have a spot for that player on their team. You are going to have a hard time finding a GM that actually does BPA in the first round.

If you say you are going to calculate BPA with need in mind then you aren’t really talking BPA. You are saying exactly what I said, finding where value intersects need. If you do that, you don’t draft Morgan.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ok.

Well I disagree that there’s no spot for Morgan on this team.

This isn’t one of our non-need positions like WR/QB/TE.

The Giants bread an butter in this era has been their DE’s. Kinda like the rest of the team, can you expect a bounce back?

YOU can…but that doesn’t mean JR will. Getting a top 10 rated player in this draft at a semi-position of need, who’s a much better prospect at a position of slightly greater need (slightly) is a win.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm with Free here,

the way I see it, the players talent relative to the depth of the position in the draft is much more obvious with Morgan IMO than Price. I looked at Price film yesterday and I agree he’s a special player, but Morgan looks like a future All Pro.

Also, the way the Giants run their ship I don’t see Price having any better of a chance of starting next season than Morgan. TC rarely starts rooks, and they have to earn it if they do. Canty sounds like he’s ready to make an impact, and a Cofield/Alford/healthy Bernard sounds like a good rotation in. I feel the DE’s have just as many problems with DT (Tuck coming off should surgery, Osi’s “time of the month”, Kiwi vying to be a starter). I agree with the Morgan pick.

by RealLT on Mar 22, 2010 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I never said Price

Price would be as big of a waste of a pick as Morgan.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Kiwi or Osi are gone

then this is a good pick.

Ed’s post says it well. He feels one or the other will be gone this year or next.

Say Osi gets traded. Passing downs. Kiwi and Morgan at end. Canty and Tuck inside.

Makes sense if he is right.

by MSP Giant on Mar 22, 2010 9:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

YES

Reese picks by need, its just not BPA, its BPA at a postion of need and thats obvious in the past few drafts in round 1

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

"Tuck had not yet broken out"

I think you made the point for drafting Morgan. We love stockpiling defensive linemen

by KumaBlue42 on Mar 22, 2010 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

No I didn't

I’m not sure how you read that. Tuck was originally projected in the 1st round potentially. When the 3rd round rolled around in 2005 he was still there. We grabbed him just like we grabbed Mannignham. A player we were not targetting, but couldn’t pass up because of value in a LATER round than expected. By the next year Tuck had not shown enough to say we could count on him as Strahan’s eventual replacement. Remember Strahan was expected to retire before the 2007 season, but came back for one more (and the SB baby!). Therefore we had a need at DE in the 2006 draft when we took Kiwi 32nd overall. We are in a very different situation now, there is not that same need. If Morgan slips to the 3rd like Tuck did, then sure go ahead pick him and “stockpile” defensive lineman. Just realize that Tuck and Kiwi were not about “stockpiling”.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are right about the Tuck draft pick

I must concede that. Using your logic if we drafted Kiwi for Strahan’s eventual departure ( though I think Tuck was that guy) then we should pick up Morgan for Osi’s eventual departure. There is a reason why Osi wants a new deal, he’s wanted one for a while now because he doesn’t want to see us draft another DE and Osi is not Stray. I know that it’s the first round in this scenario and not the third round but to bump somebody up to # 15 just to fill a need and wait around for a player like Morgan to drop to the third round is risky. I don’t want to reach for a LB and I don’t want to draft on offense unless it’s a big time OL. Osi hasn’t proven he can play the run in quite some time.

by KumaBlue42 on Mar 22, 2010 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

The fact that Tuck became a stud changes the game. When Kiwi was drafted I believe the theory was it would be Osi and Kiwi starting with Tuck staying the rotational player because they hadn’t seen enough out of him the first year. All of a sudden Tuck clicked and became a stud, resulting in them putting Kiwi at SAM just trying to find a way to get the players on the field. Now we are in a position where Kiwi and Tuck can be our starters and Osi is expendable.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see your point

But if Osi isn’t the starter will he be wanting to earn that starting role back? Doesn’t even matter, let’s say Tuck or Kiwi gets injured, who would back them up? who would rotate in when they aren’t injured? Osi or Tollefson, I don’t like the way that sounds. Unless, like you said, you draft someone in the later rounds and hope they click like Tuck did. We already have question marks at LB, drafting someone like Spoon or (whoever you have in mind, not sure ) would still leave a question mark at MLB. I’m not saying he can’t or won’t be a solid player but drafting someone like Morgan, you know what you are going to get more or less and you won’t have to worry about that spot for a while.

by KumaBlue42 on Mar 22, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can't burn a 1st on insurance

A 1st round pick is too big to use to get a player just in case a starter gets hurt. There are starters and backups for a reason. You can’t have a squad of 52 starters. What if Eli gets hurt, should we be trying to trade up for Bradford or Clausen?

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now that would make for some interesting conversation

No blue don’t draft a QB or WR obviously just for the sake of depth, and I didn’t say trade up but our Dline hasn’t touched a QB in over a season, going back to last years playoffs against the eagles. In this scenario Morgan would be the starter and Kiwi/Osi the depth. It has been stated many times by Giants brass that this football team likes to draft in the trenches. Yes there is a need for a MLB, but if Rolondo is gone it wouldn’t hurt bolstering the line, a line that was terrible last season. Would you trade up for McClain? No. Would you draft Spiller? We already have a stable of running backs. You don’t wait to draft someone because there are too many guys there, you draft because the guys at the position can be improved upon, Osi or Kiwi or both can be improved upon with Morgan. There is LB depth in the later rounds

by KumaBlue42 on Mar 23, 2010 12:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whoa

Morgan the starter? That is extremely unlikely. Kiwi will definitely leave then and who knows if Morgan is even any good?

drafting him will just create a lot of drama and tension in the locker room.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 23, 2010 12:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

You’ve got an established young vet in Kiwi who is a quality player. You don’t throw that away for the risk of a rookie. There is no gauruntee that Morgan actually pans out to be as elite as some here think.

by bigblue777 on Mar 23, 2010 8:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 23, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Kiwi

will not be thrown away and he will not “definitely” leave. He will play his role on the line, as a starter or in a rotation on this ‘team’ who’s Kiwi the next Deacon Jones? That is not throwing someone away. And he won’t leave because he’ll have a contract by the end of the year and he’ll stay and play and be the positive player that he’s been since day one. Kiwi starting drama? First time I’d hear of that

by KumaBlue42 on Mar 23, 2010 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Reese doesn't go bpa

look at Ross in 2007, when there were much better players on board but we took the corner (our other corners were all old and crap), and then in 2008 we needed a S bad so we took KP and last year everyone was worried about our WR after Burress and Toomer were off the team so we take the WR that was listed as a mid 2nd rounder.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd like to see your copy of Jerry Reese' big board

that says Ross, Phillips and Nicks were not teh BPA at that spot.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd like to see your copy that says they were

The coincidentalness of what you are suggesting is beyond rationale assumption.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

“We try to pick the best player and we are conscious of what our needs are and we definitely want to pick for value,” Giants general manager Jerry Reese said.

http://www.nfl.com/draft/story?id=09000d5d80fe53bf&template=without-video-with-comments&confirm=true

quote from JR.

Like I’ve been saying all along, BPA with need in mind. If you don;’t think DE has a semblance of need..well, your wrong and need only to scour this thread to see why it is and can be a need.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Every GM says BPA

and every GM matches to need, at least in the early rounds. Late rounds are where GMs have thefreedom to truely go BPA. Reese’s answe rby the way is a classic GM non answer.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would assume LB

is seen as a bigger need than either DE or DT. Also, really I think it is more LB as a need than just MLB. Goff and Sintim both have to be seen as question marks. The value of Kehl and WIlkenson as reserves is also questionable.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

well said

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good pick but no chance in reality

Morgan is a very good player but i have to disagree with this pick, this pick would cause more termoil than competiton. Too much money spent on our Ends, do not see him getting the playing time he deserves on this team unless this pick comes with a trade of one of our previous DE’s. If this happens, Jerry Reese would be putting his career on this pick, Management is not happy and this pick will not solve anything. Price may not be better but Morgan is not way and above him and Price actually fills a need. You can have all the Ends you want but if you do not improve the tackles it makes no sense, this pick would cause someone to lose their job IMO. It does not improve a need on defense.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:12 AM EDT reply actions  

wouldn't this then free up osi

for trade bait…get something for him now or nothing later

by Flynner on Mar 22, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Osi could already be free

Kiwi will take over as starter, you would only need depth at DE (not a 1st round pick), not another starter to let Osi go.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

i personally

dont think kiwi can start all season at a DE spot. He doesnt have the frame to be a every game every down player. when he’s fresh. he is good. but as soon as a little fatigue comes into factor he seems to get pushed around a little more than whats liked for your starting DE

Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do

by semsemma on Mar 22, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

He actually played more snaps the last two seasons

than any of our other ENDS so i think he can hold up just fine

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Your right

he has played more snaps. And what im saying is that it shows. He is very durable, doesnt get injured at all really. But against stronger/bigger tackles, he doesnt hold up well at all. He makes plays early on in games. but IMO seems to get pushed around too much for a guaranteed starter at DE.

Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do

by semsemma on Mar 22, 2010 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

They want to keep Osi

it just depends on how Osi acts but even if we let Osi go why in the world would we go out and draft another 1st round end when we have Kiwi. I think people confuse the Giants motto of “never having too many pass rushers” with we need more ends, that statement applies to all positions, he wants pass rushers at LB (boley, sintim) End (osi, tuck kiwi) we even have good rushers in TT and Rolle from the back end. We have a serious lack of interior pass rushers and Price fills that void. Morgan just makes no sense to me for us this year in round 1. BPA is overrated, alot of these players are of the same talent level but I think alot of people force themselves to rank one over another in certain instances, Price, Morgan and Graham provide the same impact on any given day but price actually would help a position of need IMO.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

His name is Osi...

    And if he plays like last year, he’s ALREADY lost his job.

by Cranky50 on Mar 22, 2010 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

You mean

If he leads the team in sacks and FF as well as fumble recoveries, he was also 1 of 2 defenders to score a TD, all this after knee surgery, so lets be careful here, I think his play has slipped but he has some good arguing points as to why he is still good.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

You mean

The guy that got blown off the ball consistently and became a successful target for teams to run at? He gets a little slack from me based on his year removed from knee surgery. But his stats don’t reflect the way he looked watching the games. I can’t see him winning the more money argument with brass based on those stats. All that said, I really hope he comes back fired up and tears things up. If not, Tuck, Kiwi, and Morgan would be a pretty darn fierce trio.

Charlie: I'll just regress, because I feel I've made myself perfectly redundant.

by Larry Soprano on Mar 22, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

I mean he wasn't a good defensive player...

On Sheridan’s awful defensive team last year. He did score a touchdown, and he led a poor defensive effort in the stats you mentioned. And we stunk on defense, we stunk with him, we would have stunk without him. I’m not into Osi bashing, and he MIGHT come back much stronger another year removed from surgery. But he also MIGHT now be the shadow of his former self that we saw last year too. And if he’s that second player, he’s not a starter, can’t stop the run, and is in somewhat effective as a designated pass rusher, BUT he doesn’t seem to understand that when your only value is as a designated rusher, you DON’T start, and he doesn’t seem able to accept that role thusfar. When your defense is so poor that you can give up long touchdown drives without ever even forcing the opponent into third down situations, you’re not stopping anyone. Teams ran at Osi and he disappeared. You and I are both entitled to our opinions and neither of us is running the Giants, BUT, last year, the guys who were, and hopefully know something about it pulled him from his starting role. It wasn’t because they didn’t like him, it was because THEY felt he wasn’t getting the job done. Hopefully he comes back and can be what he once was, but he hasn’t been that for several seasons and last year, he just wasn’t good and wouldn’t accept it.

by Cranky50 on Mar 22, 2010 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Those numbers are misleading, Blue

His sack numbers were the worst of his career. Fumble recoveries is an accident. Means he was standing in the right place at the right time. Same with the touchdown. Slice it any way you want, Osi was awful in 2009.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think You guys misunderstood

I was saying he has some good arguing points if he were to use the #‘s, im not a stats guy too much so i feel you. I think Kiwi should start to be honest hes just waaaay better all around but Osi’s one trick still keeps him around, so i was not saying that he is good or great im saying when he gets cornered about his play thats what he will point at but you guys are correct he was baaaaad last year and has never really been a consistant player by my standards.

Hopefully that clears up what i was trying to say

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

Fine with it here...

and wasn’t going after you, so hope you’re fine with it as well.

by Cranky50 on Mar 22, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

The whole defense was awful

Tuck sucked, Kiwi was non existent, I’m not sure we even had any DT’s on the field most of the time, the LB’s were running around without having any idea whats going on around them, Webster was getting burned, and I think everyone knows about the safety play.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

YEAH

Bad Defense all around, we must’ve been real special in the first 5 games because im still trying to figure out how we ranked 13th overall in the end.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

i like the pick

but it seems to me that if we DE in the first we’re already assuming Osi is gone at the end of this season.
So wouldn’t the wise move be to move him for a second rounder and bolster other areas that people are griping about. Let him walk at the end of a disgruntled year and we lose out on a roster spot this season and any trade value he would have garnered for next year.

by Flynner on Mar 22, 2010 9:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Everybody

it seems is in such a hurry to trade Osi, dump Osi, etc. why not let this play out a bit first?
There is a new DC in town, let’s wait and see how he Osi acts or reacts come training camp. Lest we forget, Strahan wasn’t always a model citizen around here, but he ended up playing here 15 years, and Osi is what 28?

by Great Gatsby on Mar 22, 2010 9:27 AM EDT reply actions  

No need to dump Osi

If anything…Morgan would get him a bit motivated.

The Rookie..any rookie, we get here, going by Coughlin’s history, has a slim chance of starting unless there’s a drastic hole on the team, which…I don’t see any position that couldn’t be made a case that we got a potential starter.

Let Osi come back motivated.

Having 4 DE’s this caliber would be a good problem to have.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good point

Have Osi become even more motiviated.. have morgan take the “TC rookie treating” and then if osi plays up to speed and morgan shows great upside in practice and situational playing time. trade osi at high value

and getting a good post 1st round linebacker is quite possible in this draft, yea?

Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do

by semsemma on Mar 22, 2010 9:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, absolutely.

After McClain…I just don’t see a LB worth it.

Weatherspoon’s name comes up..but I don’t think that as a MLB..which we can all agree on is our most pressing need when it comes to LB, that he’s in that category. I just don’t

If JR drafts him, he probably thinks otherwise so that’s OK.

But there’s plenty of MLB’s in this draft that they can get in the 2nd or 3rd rounds, they’d be more talented then who’s on the roster probably (hopefully…)

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, Free!

You and I agree on Weatherspoon. Good player, but too early and not the right fit. Of course, JR will disagree. LOL!!

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Morgan

is too good to deal with TC’s rookie treatment and that would upset me even more. I dont want him but if we do pick him he has to play now, TC is not exactly in a secure position, hes not on the hot seat either but if Morgan doesnt play and we still cant get a pass rush he might end up in a bad space………………If we draft him at 15 he has o play

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would love to see him play

but to say at this point in his career he is better than osi or kiwi and should play over either two..nah, not happening. the only way that happends is if we trade osi now, and that wouldnt really get too much action b/c of his sub-par season last year.

Id give morgan PT no doubt..but let him learn asmuch as possible while giving osi the green light to produce.

I just dont see a better pick or better player available that would help us more at this point. the top tackles have gone, and the top LB is gone. spoon is an athlete but IMO will struggle to be a nfl MLB. OF course he may flourish, but with a better guarantee that morgan will succeed at his position is a better chance to take at the 15 spot in the draft.

I wouldnt even go as far to say spoon would start over goff

Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do

by semsemma on Mar 22, 2010 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

^this.

in the offseason, the only position I’d think has a gigantic chance of needing to draft a starter is Safety. We got Rolle, so now the need for that is depth. Is that a 1st round need? Maybe not, maybe ET is valuable depth..dunno.

Other then that…we’re basically getting a prospect to develop.

DT’s got 3 starting caliber players. DE does too. THere is no MLB worth the pick. OT probably should get some consideration..but do we want to risk Anthony Davis being sane?

CJ Spiller would be a possibility, but what do we make of the 4-5 RB’s on the roster? Make it 6?

…what it boils down to is BPA, given that there’s no players at teh big need position of MLB worth reaching for (Chaney, Angerer, Lee…are they first rounders?).

Morgan on many other boards, and my own board is a top 10 player. There are no other top 10 players on the board.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

maybe no other top 10 left

but there are some top 15 and top 20 left,cmon theres no real major drop off from 10 ten to top 20 this year. Price babaaaaay but im sure Reese agrees with you. SMH

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

Im fine with the chaney "reach"

it is only considered a “reach” if they dont perform well, there is nothing about chaney that tells me he will not perform well, 1st round talent IMO

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 10:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chaney

I haven’t seen him projected as a first-rounder anywhere.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

And he will not be

Im saying his talent and play make me wonder who does these projections.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

I also do not think we are safe at DT

I like Canty but in 2 yrs i dont see Bernard or Coefield being on the team and even if they are, 1 of them never rushed the passer well and the other seems to have forgotten how to but he was injured.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nope love him

But to be honest Price has waaay better upside, Rocky is fine too but he is not going to be there forever. Coefield is just a 2 dwn player and good at it, I just know that 3 dwn DT’s dont exist anymore thats why Suh and McCoy are so highly rated.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

Canty and Alford are also in the rotation

Canty wasn’t bad cuz he’s not talented.

Canty was bad cuz he didn’t play. That was the Giants luck last year. A dude who’s never been injured in his life, was for most of last season.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

I have a strong feeling Canty will be similar to Kevin Williams in his new role…… if he is motivated, he is a suiperior athlete when his mind is right and he is healthy but him with Price………ooooooooowwwweeeeeeeeeee

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are no guarantees

There is no more guarantee that Morgan is more succesful than Spoon at the next level. There is no guarantee that any player is successful at the next level.

You are going to have a hard time finding a pro talent evaluator that would agree with your statement about Goff vs. Spoon.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

There aren;t any guarantees'

But to say you are going to draft a guy and put him outside the position of which he has been scouted at vs. drafting a guy and keeping him in the same position for the nfl. And for the sake of the discussion, both players are exacty the same as far as rated talent…. im taking the guy that doesnt have to change positions

Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do

by semsemma on Mar 22, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

You are drastically overexagerating the ‘switch’ that Spoon would make. We are not talking about a DE converting to LB. We are talking about a LB lining up at a different LB position. Chase Blackburn has lined up at every LB position for us. You are going to tell me that Blackburn can line up at more than one spot but Spoon can’t? Please, your logic is beyond flawed here.

Let’s for arguments sake consider the love that so many have for McClain. I’m not hearing questions about him making a ‘switch’. He plays ILB in the 3-4 right now. It would be a ‘switch’ for him to be a Mike in the 4-3. In fact McClain’s ‘switch’ is as big if not bigger than Spoon’s.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

ah thank you. This is my reasoning for getting Spoon (although I do like the Morgan pick in this scenario, I think) seeing as he could easily play with the same energy and effort lined up a couple yards to the left or right. In a real draft, he wouldn’t be our pick at 15 though

by RealLT on Mar 22, 2010 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ed, how about a third option

to vote on? …..like maybe: Ed I disagree, but you’re NOT an idiot……I could use similar arguments to defend my choice which is Earl Thomas. We are not stacked at this position and Phillips’ situation is far more tenuous than Osi and Kiwi. ET, I like that, is very young and , at the least, could do for our secondary what Morgan could do for our crowded DL.

by Jolly on Mar 22, 2010 9:27 AM EDT reply actions  

Thomas

This guy is probably still an option at 15, as well. This is why the draft is a crap shoot. Everybody thinks they are an absolute expert and knows what the Giants will/should do. Jerry Reese doesn’t even know exactly what he will do, and he won’t know for sure until about 30 seconds before he does it.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was wondering when ET would go too..

..depth at safety is something we learned about this year and one of the things I kept reading about ET was how he could play CB. Creates depth in two areas with a topnotch player

I don't need birthdays. I buy myself everything I need and because of my drinking its often a surprise

by ItsaToomah on Mar 22, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Great pick Ed

You said it best with “drafting a player is not just about the coming season.” The draft should be used for the future.

Would he be a starter and on the field 100% of the time? No, but he would be folded into the mix and have an immediate impact. He will also give you options with what to do at the DE postion in the coming years and not hamstring you with whiney underperforming players. He adds depth to a valued postion and would make the rest of the D better.

I would not have argued with you if you took Thomas for similar reasons, but Morgan is by far the BPA and not a reach at 15.

Charlie: I'll just regress, because I feel I've made myself perfectly redundant.

by Larry Soprano on Mar 22, 2010 9:38 AM EDT reply actions  

Thank you, Larry

I knew this pick would create a stir. Any pick would have, I think, because the guy who would be the obvious target is no longer there.
As long as we can keep the argument friendly, this is one of the great things about the whole mock process.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didn't realize it would be that big of a stir

Based on the framework of your Mock Draft, I don’t see a valid argument for not taking the consensus best defensive player on the board.

Are we still going to do a 2nd Round in this Mock?

Charlie: I'll just regress, because I feel I've made myself perfectly redundant.

by Larry Soprano on Mar 22, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Most likely

I think we will finish Round 1 in time.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

+1

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow

50/50 split, 92 vs. 92.

Good number BTW. 92. He was a defensive end, BTW

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Hmmmm

I have to disagree with this pick Ed. I understand your reasoning of grabbing the best defensive player at 15 but I don’t think we will have any problems at the DE position this season. I’m not even sure who I would recommend you take besides Morgan. If we were to draft here and take Morgan, I would rather have Taylor Mays or Earl Thomas to be honest. Grab one of those safeties as a backup in case Kenny Phillips has any issues.

GO NY GIANTS!!

by RobDomaine on Mar 22, 2010 9:53 AM EDT reply actions  

uh oh.....

you just mentioned “Mays”.

I’m TURNING GREEEN!!!!!!

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

I do not want Mays

But i thnk he will be just fine at the next level, i have heard that he played exactly like what the coaches wanted him to play like and that once with the right staff he will be a fine player.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

Is it just me...?

my gut instinct smells Roy Williams II

by Great Gatsby on Mar 22, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

I say Laron Landry II

both can’t cover for their lives, but are elite athletes.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mays is like an AT&T customer on a budget....

   He’d reach out and touch the receiver, but only if they were in the same area code, which unfortunately they usually aren’t.

by Cranky50 on Mar 22, 2010 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Roy Williams

needed glasses or somethin he was always at the spot before the receiver but he just always had bad hand eye coordination, Mays was instructed to play like a bat out of hell and he did so, I think once he gets with the people in Dallaas who will draft him, he will be fine. Good for him and them but bad for us.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not from what i have heard

They like their safeties but they really are enamored with Mays and have no problem drafting him also sensabaugh and hamlin are good but Hamlin will not be around for long i dont think

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

sense I get from Cowpoke fans is that Mays makes about as much sense to them

as it does to us.

Meaning they get Angerer when he’s mocked to them and would be even more pissed if they drafted him.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

No ones fans seem to like Mays

but i cant remeber the last time fans of any team choose a draft pick….. Jerry Jones goes with who he likes

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oh, man

Rob you mentioned Mays. That automatically puts your opinion in the circular file. I would not argue with selecting Thomas, though.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

lol

We will all have to wait and see how Mays does at the next level.

GO NY GIANTS!!

by RobDomaine on Mar 22, 2010 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Totally Happy with this Pick....

     I voted for Morgan in the poll, I would have taken him given the choices that were out there, and I’d feel like I’d won the lottery doing it. The Giants got one of the top ten prospects in the draft with the #15 position. If things do sift out this way, I’ll be happy if Reese makes the same move. Osi may be what we saw last year. If he is, we don’t want him starting and he’ll talk his way off the team if he isn’t. If he’s better, but not dominating, he’ll be unhappy about how he’s being used, and a useful player if he shuts up and gone if he doesn’t. And if he dominates, we have either exceptionaly depth or a wonderful trading position. I wanted a defensive upgrade, and while Price is a better situational fit, he’s not the player Morgan is. Spoon is an even better situational pick, IF he’s a middle linebacker in the NFL, which is possible but not a certainty, and way too much of a gamble with the #15 pick to take. Safety had already been upgraded with Rolle and there are other rounds to fill out the needs. With Morgan you have a top ten talent, without a ton of motivational or off field issues who isn’t being asked to change positions, roles or personality. Just to go out and do what he’s been doing when he’s told to do it. Excellent pick Ed, as the poll numbers were going to be against you no matter who you took, and while Morgan may not be poll’s choice, I think he’s the best player, and undoubtedly the best defensive player still on the board at the time of your pick. No complaints here!

by Cranky50 on Mar 22, 2010 9:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Poll

Yes, Cranky, I knew the poll would be split. Sorta like an election where I’ll be lucky to get 50%. Considering that Morgan got only 8% of the vote in Sunday’s poll, right around 50% agreeing with me is pretty darn good.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

i agree

i don’t think we need a 3 technique like Price anyway, I want a nose tackle type, I’m hoping the giants pick Dan Williams if it’s possible, that dude’s got a motor. Any thoughts?

by bluecifer on Mar 22, 2010 10:06 AM EDT reply actions  

Williams

Would be a terrific pick. He is off the board in this mock, though.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

agree

if we’re going 1st round DT, I’d rather have Williams. He gives them something in the DT rotation they don’t have…FAT.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hes cool

but a 2 dwn player in a one gap scheme this high?, He is a better fit in a 34 where he can play all 3 dwns. He can pressure the middle as well but fat can be replaced with upper body strength and enormous pass rushing ability to me.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

No DT is going to be more then a 2 down player with the Giants.

Even if we get ZERO DL’s in this draft…not a single player is going to be out there all the time.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thats Insane Free

Price would be a 3 down player if we got him, we only move ends to the inside because they are better pass rushers, with price, you do not need to move KIWI inside or Tuck sometimes.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nope.

Maybe he’ll be out there for 3 downs in a row…but the Giants rotate the lineman.

Been doing it since 2007-2008 at least. Worked then, pretty sure they won a Super Bowl. Could be mistaken tho….

If they have the horses, they’ll do it.

I’d say Tuck probably is on the field the most. And given that he seems to get tired cuz of it..having someone like Morgan on the roster who’s basically a clone of him, makes sense.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

WHOA WHOA WHOA

would you pleeeeeeaaaaaasssseeee stop mentioning the superbowl team and how we won it, this is damn near 3 yrs later and two DC’s later, and we won one with that theory its time to change, I think we will be multiple but too much of a rotation can hurt you as well.

If tuck goes out, Kiwi steps in we dont need a 1st rounder to spell people.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Al davis

has been trying to duplicate his past championships with the same ol methodology and look where that has gotten him, so please do not justify winning this year with how we won in 07, maybe alot of the same players but it is not the same team at all.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

And Morgan is not Tuck

He is smaller, weaker and slower. Yeah, a real Tuck clone.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow.

Well I guess every pick I’m high on, SUCKS, to you.

So I won’t go any farther.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tuck vs. Morgan comparison out of college

Justin Tuck:

At 6-5, 265, though, Tuck appears destined to play DE at the next level. Running the 40, Tuck reportedly clocked times of 4.68 and 4.74 on what was reported to be a very slow track; he also had a 37.5 inch vertical leap and broad jumped 9-10. Tuck also posted 24 reps pressing 225 pounds…

Derrick Morgan:

I leaped 36 inches in the vertical jump (I did 34 at the Combine), went 9 feet 9 1/2 inches in the broad jump (up from 9-4) and ran in the low 4.3s in the short shuttle (it was 4.43 in Indy). I did 21 reps in the 225-pound bench press, which I didn’t do at the Combine.

WalterFootball.com: Morgan is 6-3, 266 lbs. and posted two 40 times of 4.72.

by GhostDini on Mar 22, 2010 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

No player is on the field all the time

but the 3rd DT on the depth chart is going to be on the field A LOT more than the 4th DE on the chart.

And a year from now Price could be the starter while Morgan will still be sitting on the bench similar to Kiwi for the past 4 years.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

And

im aware no body is on the field all the time but a first rounder should be out there most of the time and you would only take a 3 dwn player out if he needs a breather not because you feel like it.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Highly doubt any Giants first rounder

if its taken at a DL position, that he’s going to be starting or playing “most of the time”.

Given that, and given the situation they seem to be in with Osi and/or Kiwi…makes sense to have a backup plan.

Giants bread and butter is their DE’s, much like the 80’s it was their LB’s.

Makes sense to ensure the legacy is contiuned.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Back up plan is

Called CLINT SINTIM, I would much rather give him a shot at DE which he rotates anyway on the most important dwn.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

the legacy that needs to be continued

is smash mouth D and winning

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

hypothetically speaking

would you guys pick Williams over Rolo?

by bluecifer on Mar 22, 2010 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

If i was sure we could get chaney later

Yes but I like price so wrong question for me to answer!, But i don’t think anything trumps Rolo at 15 in the eyes of Reese and Ross

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, absolutely not.

DT is deep in this draft..much like safety.

Even before we got Rolle I wasn’t too much in favor or a round 1 safety.

But basically its Rolo…then we’ll talk abotu who’s the best player for us at #15.

Rolo is THE pick…bar none, for me at #15

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

A dominant 3 technique

is exactly what a perry fewell Defense needs if we are to be aggresive, 3 dwn DT’s hardly exist and this kid Price is just that so i have to roll on the Price bandwagon even if i am the driver and the only passenger.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ed

You have three options!

Start banning people!

Rig the poll and then close it.

Post the Titans pick so that we all move on…

by G Fan in England on Mar 22, 2010 10:43 AM EDT reply actions  

Titans pick

Well … I have to GET the Titans pick first. LOL!! I’m enjoying the argument, to tell you the truth.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

any1 with access to a TV

First take on ESPN2 is going to do a story on who the giants should draft. They just promo’ed it.

by wilddre22 on Mar 22, 2010 10:43 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

They probably will highlight KINDLE

then i will have to ban Espn until May

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Since alot of us are at work

Mind telling us what they say?

Charlie: I'll just regress, because I feel I've made myself perfectly redundant.

by Larry Soprano on Mar 22, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

I actually had to step away from the TV and came back and caught the last part of it

but first off, they had Bobby damn Carpenter as one of the 2 analysts. Yes, Bobby Carpenter of the Cowboys. talk about prejudicial!

Basically him and the other analyst(didn’t catch his name) agreed that McClain would be our pick at 15. Basically the obvious that we need a replacement at mike with AP gone, front seven was supposed to be the strong point last year, yada yada yada….

Dana Jacobson then asked them to make a win prediction total and the dude next to bobby was obviously scared to say what was on his mind and said “i feel bad saying this since bobby is sitting next to me…” what a wimp. anyway he said 10 wins and bobby said 9, which i’m sure was very unbiased. As a matter of fact the other guy said they would have a tough time facing a Shanahan led skins and “of course” the cowboys twice a year. The same Cowboys handled twice last year you twit!

they replay the show at noon so i’ll try to catch the whole piece then and update if they said anything worthwhile that i missed.

by wilddre22 on Mar 22, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for the update

Doesn’t sound like they really went out of the box.

Charlie: I'll just regress, because I feel I've made myself perfectly redundant.

by Larry Soprano on Mar 22, 2010 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

bobby carpenter??????

why would espn ever do that. wouldnt it make sense to get maybe a former NYG player that would actually have a favorable opinion of the team and know the organization thinks and drafts.. i dont know.. someone like Michael Strahan maybe? even an ex cowboy player would be a better option then a current one. i hate the cowboys.

Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?

by Plaxico Burress on Mar 22, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Really?

When will this be on tv?
Hopefully afternoon

Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do

by semsemma on Mar 22, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Its ESPN

they will show it sooo many times you will be sick of it

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

ha

Ive learned that after being a part of this board, and reading other material…that I’m always two steps ahead of what ESPN says anyways lol.

It’s just funny to hear what some analysts have to say. I value boomers opinion..even though he seems to be on the fence a lot.. but mostly t jackson.

also trent dilfer, he’s smarter than i thought. And steve young, yea he’s sounds like a prick most often but he has good points that seem to be overlooked by others sometimes

Toney does what the douglas do. And no one can do what he does b/c doing it without being Toney Douglas just doesnt make it do what it do

by semsemma on Mar 22, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Steve Young

has a law degree and knows what he is talking about but he just doesnt formulate his sentences well like Charles Barkley (LMAO) as for Dilfer he is the best one they have, if i was an executive prodcer he would have his own damn hr on tv. Espn is non sense, once i got the NF network, the need for ESPN has fallen drastically.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who cares

what Dana Jacobsen and Rob Carpenter’s son thinks anyway, please?

by Great Gatsby on Mar 22, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

i'm admittedly college ignorant

so i didn’t vote either way. all i’ll say is this: if we do draft this guy, then we need to trade osi that same day and get another pick. to me, once again, it’s bolstering a position in which we are supposedly strong at. now if we are figuring that this is the last hurrah for both osi and kiwi then go for it. my guess is 1 of the 2 will be back when there contract run out, and once again we will have a dilemma as to who will start opposite tuck: Morgan or Osi/Kiwi?

That’s not taking into account that Sintim may still be in the running for that end position if he doesn’t pan out at SLB, and Canty sees time outside too(unless Fewell scraps that idea totally)

again, i’m the anti freebradshaw when it comes to college knowledge. Maybe if he’s the BPA defensively, we should trade the pick and get 2 picks and address more needs. this is a mock, so i know we can’t do that. but in real life, maybe we should explore that.

by wilddre22 on Mar 22, 2010 11:34 AM EDT reply actions  

I had to agree with Ed on this one.

Morgan is an extremely talented end and a top 10 talent. If this guy is still around, and our favorite pick here at BBV, Rolando, is gone we gotta snag him up. You don’t pass up all pro potential from the DE spot. Osi and Kiwi are not all pros at this point in time. Our ends actually weren’t impressive at all last year. And remember this is a mock based on who fell to 15. Rolo didn’t, Morgan did…Solid pick Ed.

by wangstu13 on Mar 22, 2010 11:35 AM EDT reply actions  

Solid Pick

No one knows what will happen with these guys when they get to camp. Its not like the Giants sent 3 DL to the Pro Bowl last year. They struggled pressuring the passer for entire games, so something wasn’t right. You have to approach next season as if last season is the new normal.

No other guy on the board that I like more. Probably equal to Earl Thomas (who I think has playmaker potential), but the choice between a S and DL of equal skill, you take the DL.

by trueblue63 on Mar 22, 2010 11:48 AM EDT reply actions  

I still would have taken Graham

If you don’t see him as a DE, I understand. I don’t believe Graham has the agility to cover, so I think his only spot is 4-3 DE.

Still a good pick if you go by what the “experts” say.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Mar 22, 2010 12:36 PM EDT reply actions  

"Experts"

I think some of us here know what we are talking about more than they do especially when it comes to Giants talk, the “experts” direct their energy to every team so sometimes they dont really go in depth in their assesment of a specific team and they miss alot of things. Graham would be fine in both systems to me in a 34 he Dumervil, in a 43 he is Freeny or T.Cole.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was alot of work to really attempt to do a good job with the Dolphins pick, so

that really supports your point. Each team requires a different approach, with different needs, systems and personnel decision makers. Luckily, Parcells is a pretty familiar character to most of us. I really did have to get my head out of thinking like a Giants fan.

Most of those “experts” are fans of certain teams as well and can’t really see the forest for the trees.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Mar 22, 2010 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

bad pick

we don’t need any more de’s, he will not get any playing time

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 12:47 PM EDT reply actions  

And on top of that he is getting SEVERELY overrated on this blog

he doesn’t have elite strength, he doesn’t have elite speed, he doesn’t look like a guy that can consistently get 12-14 sacks a year to me.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great Pick

This would allow us to explore our options w/Osi, and possibly get another 2nd rounder, which would be greatttt. If Reese were to grab a DT and a S in round 2, I’ll be jumping for joy!

Just gimme some playmakers

by I_Formation27 on Mar 22, 2010 1:16 PM EDT reply actions  

I voted no (Ed, please don't fire me!)

not because I think you’re an idiot or even because I disagreed with your logic, but b/c I hope that if the Giants are picking in this scenario, they trade back a few slots. If they absolutely must pick here, then I think I would prefer Morgan to Price or Witherspoon. I just think they could trade back a few picks, still get either Price or Witherspoon, and pick up some extra late round picks.

Also, I’m on record as saying I’d love Spiller. I don’t think the Giants will take him, but I hope they’re at least considering it. He’s a gamechanger, which is something the Giants just don’t have right now.

2009 Did Not Happen

by cjmulrain on Mar 22, 2010 1:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Spiller would be the HR swing here

  Morgan is the BPA here, but Spiller would be a close second IMO. He would bring us a break away threat on every play. It might be a great show to watch! Bradshaw brings that to a lesser extent, but I’m not sure he is durable enough to count on, as tough as he is.
 If this is the scenario at 15 on draft day, I agree that the Giants would trade down or just go need over BPA and pick Price or Weatherspoon (if they think he can handle MLB). And then proclaim them the BPA, of course.
  They’d probably have to sell low on Osi if they picked Morgan and that is not Jerry’s style. I think they still believe Osi will bounce back and would prefer it to happen here.

by ronjohnson on Mar 22, 2010 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

I've been refraining from the Spiller talk..

cuz apparently, talking about how a prospect makes sense means you’re in love with drafting him…which I most certainly am not.

But yea..Spiller would be a hell of a pick.

Getting something the Giants have never had…a true gamebreaking player, an X factor..would be incredible.

It fits the Giants too, cuz its not like we’re talking abotu a speed, deep threat WR. We’re talking about the ground game..or short pass, something that works in all weather.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

yup

me and you are in total agreement on Spiller.

He’s my favorite draft prospect in years, and only partially b/c I saw him dominate Maryland earlier this year in person (maybe that’s why Ed doesn’t like him?). Ever since that game I’ve followed him, and i just think he brings a dimension that the Giants have never really had and that is becoming more and more useful in today’s NFL (see: Johnson, Chris or Hester, Devin).

2009 Did Not Happen

by cjmulrain on Mar 22, 2010 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

It would be nice to have a guy like Spiller who could take a lot of

pressure off Eli by giving him a quick outlet or screen pass option to counter all those all out blitzes that are often thrown at us just because we don’t have that option now.

by giant fan since 57 on Mar 24, 2010 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm on board with this

Gamble and trade down to a spot where you think you could still get Price. It would definitely make for an interesting draft night.

by Mount17 on Mar 22, 2010 7:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good Pick

Morgan is the BPA at this point and I don’t think price is the kind of dt we need. I’d prefer Cody or cam thomas

by Dfence on Mar 22, 2010 1:37 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I think we needed the trade-down option here..

I know Ed said no for purposes of the Mock, but I have to think that in the real world, faced with this board, there’s no way JR can’t find a pass-rush lacking team (like, maybe the one in the same stadium) that wouldn’t pay a small ransom to move up to 15 for Morgan. If he’s truly the elite, top 10 player in the draft that he’s supposed to be, I think there will be plenty of action to grab him. If we got the 30th and 60th picks for the 15th, I could live with that, whether it’s a good teams 1 & 2 or, say, St. Louis’ 2 & 3.

Curious what you think, Ed. If this is the Giants real-world board and draft order, what odds do you give that JR shops the pick?

by TNYFBG on Mar 22, 2010 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Shopping

I think the chance is very good that JR shops the pick in this scenario. Hey, if you can move back, stay in the first round and pick up an extra second or third why wouldn’t you do that?

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

For you Brian Price fans

Mike Mayock doesn’t even have in his list of top 5 defensive tackles

1 Gerald McCoy
2 Ndamukong Suh
3 Dan Williams
4 Jared Odrick
5 Tyson Alualu

He also has Kindle ranked above Weatherspoon and Pierre-Paul ranked above Morgan.

by GhostDini on Mar 22, 2010 2:17 PM EDT reply actions  

I'll disagree to the grave that Jason Pierre Paul is an option

I do agree, that he may have to potential to be the best DE in the NFL.

But I’ve said this before..Morgan is going to either be Justin Tuck, or Justin Smith. Either and elite DE like Tuck, or a solid, 8 sack/year guy who is exceptional at playing the run.

JPP is either going to be young Freak Jevon Kearse, or he’ll be Gaines Adams (hopefully not with the heart condition tho…)

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Potential to be the bes DE in the NFL??????

after one year and year that his numbers were not that amazing?? wow

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Morgan & Graham have the potential

to be ONE of the best but i think JPP and Dunlap just have the potential to rob a team and cash their checks at the same bank Vernon Ghiolston uses.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Potential

meaing JPP might be the most physically gifted lineman in the draft. He dominated JUCO, which is almost like playing D-II football, or whatever they call it now.

Basically the DE version of Taylor Mays, he’s all physical talent.

This is why he’s boom or bust. BOOM, meaning potential to be the best DE in the NFL, like Jevon Kearse basically was at one point.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I feel you totally

I just rather say a player like Morgan or Graham have the potential to be the best, to me being a fan of many sports i realize that physical talent doesnt relate to potential greatness, I think Productivity & intelligence does, im tired of these guys who dont produce nearly as much as another guy being regarded as maybe the best because they run faster and jump higher when arguably the best players at many of the positions in NFL history were not the guys who ran the fastest, jumped the highest or lifted the most . Truthfully im probably just mad that JPP is ranked higher than Brian Price (my guy) thats all, sorry lol but i totally understand what you were saying………..sorry for the rant.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

read the rest.

Or don’t. Doesn’t matter I guess.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

JPP is highly boom or bust

while Morgan is boom, or solid player. I just don’t see his bust potential.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mike Mayock

and these other experts change their top fives all the time, that is a direct result of too much time btw end of the season and draft day. If you think Price isnt as good as those 5 then you have not seen him, those guys all play on good teams, Price played on a bad team with a bad line against highly touted players all the time. Mayock also had Berry as his #1 safety for the last 2 yrs now all of a sudden its Earl Thomas (BS), top fives are based on who they like and they are entitled to their own opinion but to say their top 5’s are gold is crazy.

cmon look at you last sentence your self JPP above Morgan (cmon in what world does that make logical sense?)

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I don’t understand why the draft has to be all the way at the end of april. Most colleges have already had their pro-days anyway and there isn’t anything left to do other than wait for the draft.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

In this situation, for only one reason that I can think of...

JR looks at the current state of our defensive ends and doesn’t see Kiwi as ever making a move to the next step and sees Osi as either done, or unwilling to accept the role he’d be used in and sees Morgan as a potential All-Pro and 10-year fix to the problem. I think Morgan might have that capability.

by Cranky50 on Mar 22, 2010 2:17 PM EDT reply actions  

Still don't discourage shopping the pick though, as it costs nothing...

and you’re not obligated to accept any offer unless it’s a better overall situation.

by Cranky50 on Mar 22, 2010 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?

by Plaxico Burress on Mar 22, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

The man's entitled to his opinion...

but if I’m picking, I want more than a seven game career to go on. Pierrre-Paul certainly has potential, but he also could be a total bust. If it’s the second, it’s the kind of move that can doom a franchise. If it’s the first, you tip your hat to who takes him and congratulate Mayock on his observation. I’d still take Morgan 100 times out of 100 over Pierre-Paul with the Giants pick.

by Cranky50 on Mar 22, 2010 2:22 PM EDT reply actions  

yup.

this.

I’d take JPP in the 2nd round…he’s just too boom or bust.

I’d rather take more of a sure bet like Morgan.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

All this Defensive End talk has got me dizzy

3rd round or after for DE’s, and all RB’s if i were reese, may not even grab a DE at all, with all the injuries and heavy rotating i dnt even know who is good anymore, they put kiwi inside this past year to free up Tuck, now everyone thinks he cant make the next step, If we draft morgan he will be stuck in kiwi mode times 2

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well..

Does he play hockey too?

by Great Gatsby on Mar 22, 2010 5:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Derrick Morgan v. Brian Price

Look. This is a great example. What happens if all the best OT’s and the stud DT’s are gone and McClain is also off the board? The Giants were merely average rushing the passer and they were lacking in stopping the run. So, it comes down to who Jerry has ranked highest on his board of remaining players. Will he have Morgan or Price ranked higher? I think either guy would be a value pick and a need pick. There are still questions regarding Osi and Tuck. DT is a need but, you can never have too many pass rushers.

by ejcal70 on Mar 22, 2010 3:08 PM EDT reply actions  

That's..

What Ernie Accorsi said when he drafted Kiwi in Round 1, and I admit, I raised my eyebrows.

by Great Gatsby on Mar 22, 2010 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Price is a pass rusher

who struggled against the big middle of heavy offensive lines.

by GhostDini on Mar 22, 2010 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

this.

Wouldn’t be against Price…but the waxing and waning on his true ability is making me dizzy…

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

When you get double teamed you struggle – no surprise there

Morgan didn’t do crap against freakin Bulaga either so …??

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

you act like that's not a big deal.

Bulaga was one of the best OL’s in the country his whole career.

And that’s being objective, not all out Iowa U like you seem to have.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Errr

before the combine he was rated below Davis, Williams and slightly above Campbell, now after the combine interviews everyone has him way up than what his tape showed.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 22, 2010 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah.

Bulaga was always the #2 OT.

Davis’ work ethic was always questioned or else he’d be #1. Williams is the reason why Sam Bradford broke his shoulder, cuz he stinks at LT, and Campbell has barely played.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

If the Giants pick Brian Price

I’ll root like heck for him to do well. However, so many DTs of his ilk are supposed to be great and never pan out. Warren Sapp, a healthy Tommie Harris, and Kevin Williams aren’t drafted every year. They’re very rare. If I’m picking a pass-rushing DT at #15, he better be akin to those guys and I don’t see that in Price.

by GhostDini on Mar 22, 2010 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

He struggled against the big middle of heavy offensive lines

because most people do and they tried to double and tripple him every time, he does need to work on his base but if thats the reason to not select him, that would be having no confidence in robert nunn (DL coach) or any coach because everyone needs to work on something coming out of college.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 8:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Get this kid

hes the BPA. Go on line and watch some of his game film. It speaks for itself. Hes a high motor, versatile guy just like Tuck. Unlike Osi, you wont be able to run at him.

This lets us negotiate with Kiwi and trade Osi to a situation he will be happy in for maybe another second – where we can take a DT or a LB. Lots of depth at those two positions, but not much that is worth using the 15th on if the top guys dont fall to us.

by ryanwk628 on Mar 22, 2010 5:41 PM EDT reply actions  

BOOOooooooooooooo

Sorry, I respectfully offer that this pick stinks.

If this is the scenario, and the Giants feel that a DE is the best available player on the board then the play is TRADE DOWN!!!!!!

If you are going to take a DE here, then answer these questions:

1) Why did the Giants draft Sintim?

2) Did the Giants dump OSI for an extra pick? If they did, then fine I will digress. But otherwise….

3) With three, potentially four effective DE’s on the roster (and I would also offer that Canty can be a servicable end), we are taking a “Developmental” player at that position that will play in a rotation when the Giants could take any number of players at probably no less than FOUR positions (ILB, OLB, DT, S) that could start and possibly play full time.

4) We have a complete CORE of a championship team, a franchise QB, a solid offense which we almost never have – and again, we are going to take someone at a position where we are absolutely the deepest – and leave several gaping holes on the defense unfilled? This is a guy who may very likely be rotational at BEST as a rookie…. Don’t get it.

No way. You will hear me booing clear from Houston if this is the pick WITHOUT making a move and aquiring additional picks for Osi, Kiwi or something to justify this pick. DUMP THIS PICK if this is what is going to happen, move down, and fill some of the gaping holes on this defense, not DE.

by dubsrub on Mar 22, 2010 9:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Here's some

1) He’s our OLB
2) No
3) S- We signed Rolle, there’s 6 rounds to the draft to get another safety
    OLB- See answer one
    ILB- McClain’s gone, 6 rounds to get one
    DT- we have 3 starters already…just as likely to play snaps as a DE

4) Yes, we have a solid CORE to the team. Which if you look at what happened at the end of 2008 and all of 2009, the bread and butter, the DE’s took a step back as a unit. The Giants will win cuz they pressure the QB

4-5 DE’s…all who get after the QB, sounds like the Giants would be eating QB for dinner.

After the get Morgan..then….
Round

2) – Jamar Chaney _MLB
3) Major Wright S
4) DT..take your pick, Arthur Jones, Torrell Troup, Livnal Joseph. One should be here.
5)Deji Karim RB
6) Kevin Matthews C
7) OT, KR

Boo that.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good Board.

I like 2 & 5 alot, same places i have them on my draft board, i dont mind the others as well, I like major wright, especially as the 3rd safety, I would go price in 1st tho, I do not mind morgan at all if we get rid of someone. That someone im sad to say it indeed would probably be Kiwinuka even though you know I hate to say it. Kiwi would probably bring the most in a trade because of his youth and upside, of course he would probably go to St.louis for a few picks or James laurinitis {( just kidding)}. Morgan would step in and play the kiwi role until Osi starts to slip or he plays out the rest of his contract and then leaves. This would leave Tuck and Morgan and make us dominant on the edge, i think he is special you and Ed see justin Tuck and I see Julius Peppers a bit, either way both great. However I dnt think JR and TC want to get rid of any one, i think they figure they are fine at edge and draft Price to address the interior of line but if we do get Morgan then you can almost bet another annoucement comes regarding a trade shortly there after or right before.

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 22, 2010 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Its not about getting rid of anyone now

its about getting the best defensive lineman available. He’ll play, make an impact and help the Giants as an elite player in the first round, something they haven’t gotten their hands on since #10 in 2004.

Also, scaring Osi into thinking that his shit does indeed not stink and he’s gotta play his ass off to remain a NYG his whole career, which I’m pretty sure he does. Motivated and beast mode…Osi is more valuable to the Giants that way either on the team or as trade bait. Plus, him having a solid 2010 campaign is a good thing.

They’ll have a decision to make too soon regarding Osi and Kiwi. Whatever they do..the Giants bread and butter is not their LB’s, not their DT’s, but their DE’s.

I’d rather have a 20 y/o monster of a DE…a dude who’s a lot like Tuck, raring and ready to go when that happens.

Giants win the SB with their 5 headed monster DE corps, with Osi in the mode of beasts getting 15 sacks…then bitches about his contract, then we ship his ass to the Jets for their #1 overall pick next year.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 22, 2010 10:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Free

1) Sintim has hardly even played a lick at LB on a team that had the worst linebackers in the league…. Don’t you think that as ineffective as they were that we would have seen Sintim at some point?

2) Why in the world would we want to draft an Arthur Jones, Troup or Joseph when there a bunch of big studs up there early? So we can have another Jay Alford or Cofield (who is game but not great) or Clancy or Washington to add to the rotation? This is one of the best DT drafts in years. Not that I am huge on Price, but I have no idea how the Giants could pass on Price here and take any DE.

3) Really, you think that Tuck, Kiwi, Osi et al all just forgot how to play and now suck…. Do you really believe that? I don’t. I think the flap that Osi had with Sheridan in camp told the tale early on – the Giants mindset and scheme changed from what made them successfull under Spags. You can either believe that OR you can believe that just about everyone on the defense cooincidentally had the worst season of their lives…. Tuck played with one arm all year.

I hold out hope that the Giants will use Osi as a bargaining chip to move up and get the real DT they need. I am not sold on McClain and hope we can end up doing what it takes to get a Suh, McCoy, Williams et al…. If Spags likes Osi, I could not understand the Rams not wanting to deal with us for him and multiple picks – the Rams need about 7 starters, taking Suh or Bradford would not be the answer for them, they would be better served trading down.

As long as we don’t take Spiller or any offensive player, I can live with it.

by dubsrub on Mar 22, 2010 11:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

1) So…why are we drafting a LB, ever again, if we’re not giving our high draft picks a chance? Sintim was a rook. Hurt too. Deserves a shot, will get a shot. OLB may not be solved…but I sure as hell would rather get a look at Sintim in that spot then ANOTHER rookie.

2) Because Morgan is an elite player in the draft.

3) You’re inventing things I didn’t say. Never said they all suck. All I wrote was the “stepped back as a unit”.

Again, the Giants bread and butter is their DE’s. If you want to rely on these 3 again..that’s fine. If they’re healthy..just like the RB’s, they’re very good. We don’t know if they will, and maybe they could use an infusion of talent??? I think they could.

As for Arthur Jones???? Jones is a lot like this year’s Justin Tuck. As in, an elite 1st round player, that got hurt and plummets in the draft.

That’s why Arthur Jones.

And Spags can trade down. As long its not with the Giants, its OK.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 23, 2010 6:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Geez, Dubs

You do understand that in the rules of this Mock I could not trade down? And that I said trading down would be a good idea?
Let me answer your questions, though.
1. The Giants drafted Sintim to play linebacker, not defensive end.
2. No they did not dump Osi. This gives them the option of doing that, though.
3. Canty is not a 4-3 DE. And you have to look at more than 2010, which I keep saying.
4. Almost every rookie is rotational. C’mon, did Hakeem Nicks play every down? No. Morgan will be a stud for a long time.

by Ed Valentine on Mar 22, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

On Nicks

To be fair, WR after QB is the position you least expect to have an impact as a rookie due to the learning curve in transition to the pro game.

by bigblue777 on Mar 22, 2010 11:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Sam Bradford was still on the board

Would you take him?

I don’t really see much difference unless the pick means conclusively that we have traded Osi or Kiwi for additional picks or players.

Either way, we would be using our first pick on a guy who would be lucky to see much playing time. Wouldn’t you say that if we took any of the top five LB’s or DT’s that they would see a vast MAJORITY of playing time this year

by dubsrub on Mar 22, 2010 11:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

YES!!!

If Bradford was on the board I’d hold him for ransom and get a ton of picks. Clausen too.

The top 2 LB’s are first rounders. One is a MLB, the other is a OLB. And the MLB isn’t likely to be there.

The other 3 MLB’s are likely there in the 2nd and beyond, so..we can wait.

Ditto for the DT’s.

Just cuz we don’t fill that """"need"""" in round one, doesn’t mean its not getting filled.

With the rotation the Giants have along the DL…highly doubt a DT or a DE is going to see this so called “majority” of time. Highly, doubt it…unless everyone’s hurt AGAIN.

DWTDD

by FreeBradshaw on Mar 23, 2010 6:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

No Way

we pass on both Brian Price and Earl Thomas for Derrick Morgan.

"We're only going to score 17 points?!" - Tom Brady

by iLL on Mar 23, 2010 2:51 AM EDT reply actions  

As long as the Giants

End up with Price & Deji Karim (My guys) im fine, i also really really want Chaney, why doesnt anyone talk about Jamar, man he’s a cold LB

But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!

by Blue Gates on Mar 23, 2010 10:01 AM EDT reply actions  

People act as if this is a fantasy league.

I accept that, in this situation, it is a mock draft with no trades allowed which makes it unrealistic enough to skew the rationale behind the picks. What bugs me a little are the comments following that take us completely out of this dimension.

Even without a cap, you have to make fiscal sense. I’m pretty sure that Mara and Tisch have Reese sticking close to the projected cap for this year, even if it’s not in place.

We now have two 1st round level Safeties and the money invested to make that happen. It would make little sense to add another 1st round salary to the mix, so you will more than likely not see a safety taken in rd. 1. I am absolutely sure that we’ll add depth from a later round, but not one that will take the bigger money that can be used elsewhere.

For us to want a DT in round one, he had better be superior to anyone on our D-line, because we have our fair share invested there as well. If we were really unhappy with any of them, they would already be gone. We’ve got alot of money in this unit with Cofield, our most consistent player, up for contract at the end of the year. I don’t see Price as a big enough upgrade to go #15 for us.

at DE, we have Tuck at around $6M, Osi at $4.5M, Kiwi $1M, Tollefson $650K. That’s $12M, approximately, invested in the total rotation with Kiwi’s contract coming up. That’s not terribly cost prohibitive to improve one of the top positions, salary-wise, but a position where we have a stockload of talent.

Our Linebacker Corps, however, has alot of room in the budget to improve a unit that has the biggest glaring hole. If the staff believes we are pretty well set at most other positions, there is alot of flexibility in the draft as far as trades are concerned and we might see Reese go against convention and trade up to fill our biggest need. We can all rest assured that JR will not do anything that doesn’t help the team, but I think he will be more aggressive in improving our lot from last year.

All that being said, Free Agency has until April 15th to shake up the draft needs of teams and we really won’t know where we sit until then. Mock drafts can be fun, but let’s not get too excited about our picks until we know what our pre-draft roster looks like. We can argue that much more vehemently then. Until that time, let’s keep it light.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Mar 23, 2010 10:32 AM EDT reply actions  

Good Points...

   I’m not sure they compartmentalize the budget quite that much with the various groupings of offensive and defensive positions, as I suspect they keep “the whole” of the team as the primary focus and will “find” money from another source to the extent it’s available to fill a hole elsewhere if they decide it needs filling. Totally agree on free agency (and trades) which will keep this a moving playing field until the actual draft day itself. For example if the Giants traded for a middle linebacker (don’t expect this), or signed one via free agency, what we’d be looking for in the draft would change greatly. The same for other teams, i.e. one of the early picks we project for a quarterback could change if Kolb ends up with one of those teams as an example. Then they’re no longer likely to overpay for ANOTHER quarterback in the draft.

     I don’t expect us to draft a safety early, but I do think availability of quality, along with medical information regarding Phillips that we don’t have, would play into that. Opperating as though Phillips isn’t available, if more than just words, could be justification for it, and if they feel the need, I don’t have a problem with it. Anyway, I generally agree that we’re speculating on an ever changing event with moving pieces and it’s probably best not to view anything as set in cement.

by Cranky50 on Mar 23, 2010 10:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Just words

I’m sure they’re planning on going for safety depth, but it is with a decent amount of confidence in Phillips returning. I believe that Rolle was the move that primarily dealt with the outside chance of KP being hampered by the injury.

In the business side of football, the actually DO keep control over what positions get the bulk of the money with regard to averages. It fluctuates, but you can always depend on a certain values being attached to certain positions. Just look at the rosters and payrolls across the board and you will find that it pans out that way. When you see positions loaded with money, on most teams you see that come back into balance by the next season or two.

That’s not saying that a team that has alot of rookie players manning starting positions doesn’t meet exceptions, but they have to pay them when their rookie contracts come up or lose them, so it balances out league-wide. QB’s are the wild card, to some degree, and are usually the highest paid players on a team, but their are the few who defy the norm. There are teams fielding career backups as starters and paying them less than some rookies. Those with franchise Quaterbacks are making up the difference, for sure, and those teams that don’t are rarely very successful.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Mar 23, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sounds reasonable...

    I’d agree that there are patterns and general target areas, but that these are “goals” and subject to short-term fluctuation to deal with the individuals, situations and needs at hand. Also agree that the Rolle signing was MAJOR for flexibility in the draft as well as Phillips not being ready to go. I do expect we’ll add another safety, but not early or as a priority, but as hopefully quality depth. That would put us in reasonable shape throughout the secondary assuming Ross is healthy.

by Cranky50 on Mar 23, 2010 11:57 AM EDT reply actions  

Why not Brandon Graham?

 I’ve watched this guy play and believe me he is an absolute freak of nature and,those who say that he’s not suited to play 4-3 don’t know what they’re talking about.Sure he was recruited to be a pass rushing LB at Michigan(Go Blue)but he proved to be more than just a pass rusher as he became a complete DE who can do both(stop the run and get to the QB).I’m not saying that Derrick Morgan is a bad choice but,I have a feeling that Brandon Graham will be the better pro.

by moncho619 on Mar 23, 2010 6:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Ed, You're Talking My Language!

I’ve been thinking this for a while and have said it on BBV a couple times. Osi was horrible against the run last year and I don’t think the Giants or many of the fans want to just give him the starting job no matter what. I believe the Giants made a mistake drafting Kiwi, and I don’t think he will reach his full potential until he leaves the Giants and becomes an OLB in a 3-4. The Giants do have a need at DE.

I have seen more than one draft report saying that this is the deepest draft at the DT position ever. There will be good DT’s available in the second and third round. It would be a mistake for the Giants to reach for one in the first round just because it is a greater need than DE. If I was Reese and Morgan was there at 15, if I knew I could get even a third -rounder for Osi I would pull the trigger.

I do disagree with you on McClain. I do not think he is a perfect fit at MLB in a 4-3. Even McClain has said he would be a better fit in a 3-4. The consensus on Weatherspoon seems to be that he is a better fit at WLB. They may be wonderful players, but if they don’t fit our needs or system, the Giants shouldn’t pick them.

by Be Driven on Mar 25, 2010 2:16 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Plaxshittin_small
Giants Fandom in Pictures
Perry2_small
Eli Manning is Elite.

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Giants are Changing, for Better or Worse
Small
The 2010 Giants, Contender or 2009 all over??
Images_small
JPP and Joseph - Contract game
Images_small
Rookie Hazing
Small
DO WE HAVE A GAME BREAKER?
All-pro-football-jerseys_2095_31376433_small
Training Camp Battles
Small
Imagine the havoc
Sp_strahan_small
Keith BULLUCK
All-pro-football-jerseys_2095_31376433_small
NYG Sign Keith Bullock

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS

Get Your Giants' Gear

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Washington Redskins defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth signs autographs during the NFL football team's training camp and fan appreciation day, Saturday, Aug. 8, 2009, at Redskins Park in Ashburn, Va. (AP Photo/Nick Wass) +3 updates

NFL Training Camps News: Albert Haynesworth Fails Conditioning Test

Photo +9 updates

Giants Waive Chad Jones, Likely To Return After Clearing Waivers

FILE -- This is a Feb. 3, 2008, file photo showing New York Giants receiver David Tyree (85) catching a 32-yard pass in the clutches of New England Patriots safety Rodney Harrison (37) during the fourth quarter of Super Bowl XLII in Glendale, Ariz. Tyree is back in the NFL, hopeful his health won't be an issue in his quest to earn another Super Bowl ring, this time with the Baltimore Ravens. (AP Photo/Gene Puskar, File) +1 updates

David Tyree To Re-Sign With, Retire As A Giant

More from SBNation.com >


Editor-In-Chief

Ed_valentine_2_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Blueshirt_banter_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Small brisulph

Authors

Tyree_believe_small cjmulrain