Daily NFL Draft Prospect Profile: A.J. Edds, OLB, Iowa
[Remember to check the '2010 NFL Draft' section for all stories relating to the draft.]
As we have discussed the needs our New York Giants have in the upcoming NFL Draft we have talked extensively about linebacker. Almost exclusively, however, that discussion has been focused on the middle linebacker position.
That is, of course, justifiable. Don't, however, fool yourself into thinking that the Giants are completely set at the two outside linebacker spots.
On the weak side Michael Boley played to mixed results in his first year as a Giant. Terrific athlete, good in space, but not very sturdy when the ball is run in his direction. On the strong side 2009 second-round pick Clint Sintim is likely to take over for Danny Clark (yippee!!!!). The consensus is that Sintim should hold up well against the run and help the pass rush, but he did have a disappointing rookie year. So, he still has to prove himself.
So, with Clark likely gone and plenty of questions about both the starters and reserves on the outside it won't be a huge surprise if the Giants grab a player in the draft who can compete for an outside linebacker spot. Particularly, in my view, on the strong side.
That brings us, finally, to the subject of today's Daily NFL Draft Prospect Profile. That would be Iowa's A.J. Edds, a solid if unspectacular player who reports indicate could be a steady strongside LB at the NFL level.
Let's take a closer look.
A.J. Edds Scouting Reports
From DraftAce.
Prototypical size and strength. A very instinctive defender. Solid in all aspects of the game; can stop the run, get after the quarterback and drop back into coverage. ... Does everything well but nothing great. Athleticism is only average. Speed is marginal.
Edds is a perfect fit at strong-side linebacker in a 4-3 scheme, but his skill set doesn't translate perfectly into any other position or scheme. At worst he should be a solid backup, but he doesn't have the upside to suggest that he could develop into an above average starter.
From Consensus Draft Services.
A consistent player who doesn't get a lot of hype, but is always in the right place at the right time. His biggest asset may be his size, at nearly 6-foot4 and 240 pounds, he can take on the bigger pass-receiving TEs. He's particular/y effective in coverage, showing a good drop and exceptional read and react abilities. ... He's a form tackler who squares up well, and then wraps up the ball-carrier. Understands and applies all of the fundamentals consistently. ... Edds has some athletic limitations, such as lateral agility and ability to change direction smoothly. He's also not a terribly powerful player for his size and needs to add more functional strength to take on blockers.
Edds is not going to be outworked on the field, in practice, or in the books, but athletic limitations will keep him out of the first couple days of the draft. He could bulk up and be a solid backup at SLB in a 4-3.
From the National Football Post.
Reads and reacts quickly to plays at the line of scrimmage and has the initial burst to make his way into the backfield and close on the football. Isn't a real sudden athlete on contact but fights for every inch and does a great job playing with inside leverage and finding the football. Displaying really impressive instincts and always seems to be flowing toward the action.
Showcases the ability to bump off the line and takes a liking to really beating on the tight end off the snap. Looks like a guy who could win a spot at as strong-side linebacker in the NFL. Edds is never going to be a star, but he has the ability to beat tight ends in the run game and be a productive starter for an NFL defense.
Why Edds fits with the Giants
In truth, all the Giants eggs are in one basket currently when it comes to strong-side linebacker. Meaning they are counting on Sintim to step into that role, and there really is no Plan B at the moment. You have to think Clark won't be back, and no one else on the roster really fits as a strong-side guy. Right now the Giants depth chart does not even list a backup for Sintim. The Giants could probably put Chase Blackburn there in a pinch, but that is not ideal. Edds seems like a guy who could at least provide some protection as a mid- to late-round pick.
Why the Giants should pass
Because he might be Blackburn re-incarnate. And the Giants already have Blackburn. Speed would be a concern, although that is not always the No. 1 priority at linebacker.
(E-mail Ed at bigblueview@gmail.com. Follow Big Blue View on Twitter.)
20 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What round is this kid projected to go in?
seems like a decent pick as a back up SAM especially if hes taken in rounds 5, 6. does sound a lot like chase, but can you really be that upset with having chase blackburn solely as a backup? having 2 chase blackburns, at both MLB and SLB, getting a few plays a game doesnt sound too shabby to me.
Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?
by Plaxico Burress on Mar 18, 2010 11:16 AM EDT reply actions
Not at all ( Chase is cool)
as a matter of fact i dont know why chase never got the chance to start at strong side over Danny Clarke, how can a guy be the first option at MLB behind Pierce and the first option at WLB behind Boley but for some reason Danny Clarke ( not knocking him) started for 2 yrs at SAM over him……. something just didnt seem right there! I guess when your part of coughlin’s first draft he loves you forever not to mention he loves guys with military backgrounds and dicipline.
But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!
agreed
i should have started over danny clark this year. i never understood that either. chase always did a decent job on the feild. cant say the same for clark. it was painful seeing DC on the feild while chase sat the bench
Lawyer: Peter, Sarah has decided to press sexual harrasssment charges against you.
Peter: Sarah...Is that the one we video taped taking a dump?
by Plaxico Burress on Mar 18, 2010 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions
Edds maybe the top pure 43 strong side backer
He is consistent but will not necessarily wow you, slated to go in the 3rd to 4th range he would be a good pickup and insurance policy incase something happens to Sintim. Like you said he is a solid backup who could start for a few games but he’s pretty much peaked IMO. I still like Navarro Bowman as well for the strong side.
But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!
Weatherspoon can play all 3
Honestly, the fact that we we really have question marks lingering at each spot is part of why I like Weatherspoon so much. Spoon si aprojected as being able to play any 3 spots in a 43 defense. Drafting him would drastically improve our odds of fielding a good linebacker corps. If for example Goff has really stepped it up this year, but Sintim isn’t quite there yet Spoon can play SAM. If the reverse is true and Sintim has turned all that potnential into something, but Goff just isn’t cutting it Spoon plays Mike. Even if Boley just isn’t cutting it on run downs and becomes a nickel only player Spoon can play the WILL. He gives us the most options.
Spoon is a beast
The value is there in the first round at 15 definetly. I wouldnt play him at sam even if he could tho, I thinkg Goff has the size and aggression to play SAM and spoon would be at mike for sure. If we draft spoon he slides in the middle automatically……..Goff and Sintim battle it out at starting SAM backer
But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!
Works for me
I’d be fine with that scenario as well. I just feel like the more potential options we have going in based on player versatility the better the chances that we come out the other side with a solid starting lineup. Some of the other potential LB draft choices do not offer anywhere near the versatility that Spoon can bring to the team.
Depending on how the rest of the draft goes
yea, I think Edds is a good possibility. Good overall SAM prospect. Would like to get both those Iowa LB’s on the squad actually…
Edds and Jermain Cunningham are my ideal SAM prospects for the Gints, and I got Edds right below Cunningham.
Should those 1st three rounds go something like
McClain
Safety
Linval Joseph/other large DT
…Edds or Cunningham in the 4th would be fine with me.
Master of the squeegee
definitely Angerer first if they're both there
cuz Pat Angerer makes fking plays dammit
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 18, 2010 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Who is...
Free, who is the kid from Penn State who did well at the combine?
by Great Gatsby on Mar 18, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybe...?
He is caucasian, that I remember, where is Lee projected to go?
by Great Gatsby on Mar 18, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
LOL
Brady was so smug, when he heard those comments.
by Great Gatsby on Mar 18, 2010 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Lol, yes he was...
and Lee is projected 2nd-3rd round.
"We're only going to score 17 points?!" - Tom Brady
I think all 3 LB's did well at the combine
Navorro Bowman, Sean Lee and even Josh Hull.
I dunno if I’d take any of em, maybe Bowman
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 18, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn't be shocked if Edds was there when the Giants pick...
in round 5. I wouldn’t want him early in the draft, but he seems more “football player” than athletic speciman and the Giants need football players on defense. There’s nothing wrong with being competent rather than flashy and while the upside isn’t dazling, there aren’t huge holes here, and he fits a defined role in the current Giants defensive scheme, rather than being another positional project, and baring the sudden appearance of a typical nose tackle type, I don’t see the Giants going 3-4 tomorrow.
If he starts dropping
I wouldn’t mind the giants picking him up in the later rounds.
by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 18, 2010 12:20 PM EDT reply actions
Weatherspoon can not play all 3
I think he has the potential to play all 3, though. Weatherspoon has trouble shedding blocks, can overpursue gaps, and take false steps. It’ll take him a while to play the ILB spot in a 4-3 at a high level. He’s better suited at OLB where he can use his athletic speed to avoid blocks.
I agree with on one thing bigblue, and that’s Michael boley is not an every down LB. He’s just too much of a liability against the run, especially on goal-line situations where teams are running right at him.

by 




















