Daily NFL Draft Prospect Profile: Anthony Davis, OT, Rutgers
[Remember to check the '2010 NFL Draft' section for all stories relating to the draft.]
No one who is thinking clearly will argue against defense being the priority of the New York Giants' draft this April. If the Giants choose, however, to grab a left tackle prospect with their No. 1 pick and address middle linebacker, defensive tackle and other needs later, it would be hard to argue against that as well.
We know the offensive line began to show cracks in 2009, and elite tackle prospects are not easy to find. There are several probable first-round picks who fit that description this time around, though.
Today, one of them is the subject of our Daily NFL Draft Prospect Profile. That would be Anthony Davis of Rutgers, a 6-foot-6, 330-pound behemoth who could be off the board before the Giants select. If he isn't, though, things could get interesting.
Let's take a closer look.
Anthony Davis Scouting Reports
From DraftSite.com.
Great strength, size and length with long arms. Excellent footwork with very good quickness and agility for a man his size (6'6" 330lbs). Plays with very good balance while displaying tenacity and power. Keeps his feet moving and is a very good run blocker. Has played on a solid offensive line throughout college and he has been the anchor. Inconsistent technique and questionable work ethic and character. Ran a 5.38 at the combine with 21 reps on the bench (225 lbs).
From SB Nation's Mocking The Draft.
Has a very good shot at being the first tackle taken this April. He certainly looks the part at 6’6/325 pounds, but he is more than just a sexy prospect from the naked eye. He is one of the more powerful linemen in this class and that should get him on the field right away. He has more than enough athleticism to get by and with some good coaching, his technique will evolve the point where he can be a Pro-Bowl caliber left tackle. He has battled some minor weight issues and been benched on two separate occasions for violating team rules, so there will need to be some investigating in to his character and work ethic.
From the National Football Post.
He certainly has the power to hold the point of attack against the bull-rush. Looks natural on the move in the run game. Does a nice job breaking down in space and hitting/sealing targets at the second level. Displays natural power on contact as an in-line run blocker, consistently turning defenders away from the ball and saying on blocks. Overall, he looks like the nation's premier left tackle prospect.
From Walter Football, which I have begun to realize tends to write some of the most negative scouting reports you will find on many players. Whether that is good or bad I don't know. It is just different.
Davis' intangibles aren't as bad as Andre Smith's, but they're bad. Davis is a highly overrated prospect, but some team will still draft him in the top 25 picks. In the beginning of the year, his tape was terrible and this turned me off, but once he got in shape toward the middle/end of the season, he was far more productive. Davis will be as good as he wants to be, but ultimately he's not the type I'd take a chance on. Players with really poor intangibles - especially offensive tackles - don't often pan out in the NFL. Two sources have told me he performed poorly during the interviews at the 2010 NFL Scouting Combine.
Player Comparison: Jason Peters. Peters is an elite player when he puts in the work, but despite a great skill set, he is a pretty average tackle. Like Davis, conditioning and love of the game is an issue with Peters.
Why Davis fits with the Giants
Because he is "the nation's premier left tackle prospect." If the guy is a Pro Bowl player wouldn't the Giants line be set for a long time with him on one side, Will Beatty on the other and David Diehl sliding in to left guard? It will be interesting to see if the Giants look to add a tackle in the draft. It will also be interesting to see in which order Bruce Campbell, Trent Williams, Bryan Baluga and Davis come off the board. All four could go in the first 20 or so picks, which tells you what a premium teams place on protecting the quarterback's blind side.
Why the Giants should pass
Because of those whispers about his work ethic and his weight problems. If the Giants want to grab a left tackle with their first pick Davis is unlikely to be their only option. With the concerns about his character, though, he might be the riskiest option.
(E-mail Ed at bigblueview@gmail.com. Follow Big Blue View on Twitter.)
0 recs |
40 comments
|
Comments
Pass
I have heard alot about his questionable work ethic. Would rather go w/Trent Williams. Hopefully this is the highest we are going to be drafting for a while and I dont want to chance the 15th overall pick on a guy who lives by the Randy Moss quote “I play when I want to play.”
Exactly, PASS
No way, no how…next!
Like Giants56, I do not want to see the #15 pick used on a guy with questionable work ethic and potential for off field trouble. Hopefully, this is the last time we pick as high as 15 for a while. I want to see us having picks somewhere between 29-32, mostly at 32. While we have this opportunity, we need a real difference maker. I do not see Davis as that guy.
Davis is Going to be Good
I think the Giants have more pressing needs on the defensive side of the ball. I do agree about his character. He is the type of player that will probably be a perennial Pro Bowl player but also be appearing in the police blotter.
by ChicagoGiantsFan on Mar 11, 2010 11:54 AM EST up reply actions
I don't see that at all.
Davis, while an idiot, doesn’t come off as someone who’s going to be involved with the police and such.
He seems more of a guy who’s going to have issues with little things that will piss coaches off like meetings and offseason workout regimines.
Davis is definitely putting people off as of now
I still think he’s a good player (and yea..Walter football seems like the “Zillag” of mock draft sites)
He still possibly is the best OT in this draft. He’s not Andre Smith, but he’s a similar “natural talent”…tho Tony Davis is much more athletic them Smith.
I’d rather have Will Beatty as the LT, and I think they could use a mauler at RT. Davis, even for all his size, seems like a finesse blocker.
I like Brian Bulaga or Trent Williams (more so Bulaga….I think he’s a Jon Runyan waiting to happen….less hair sticking out of his shoulder pads hopefully)
Master of the squeegee
Ill pass on this guy aswell
definetly not at 15, and he is not posiibly the best OT in the draft that spot belongs to Okung in my opinion
But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!
I’m at Rutgers and seen him play over and over again. He is exactly a mauler and not a finesse blocker. By any sorts. He has questionable character problems, but none of these reports mention how he came into Rutgers.
He was a LARGE OT with minimal amounts of muscle and an extraordinary amount of talent. Schiano and the rest of the coaches here transformed him into a the OT he is. He definitely pays attention when it comes to coaching because they told him he can’t play unless he turns all his fat into muscle.
He would be a great pick. If we are going on BPA and he is at the 15 spot. He would be the BPA. He has the biggest upside of any OT according to both Mel Kiper and Todd McShay. I think it would be a good choice because everyone else on the line has a good head on their shoulders.
He can especially helped out by Shaun O’Hara (product of RU). I think this would be a wise decision for the Giants if they’re looking at OT.
by ny12giants92 on Mar 11, 2010 12:26 PM EST up reply actions
Oh.
I stand corrected then. If he’s a mauler then he’s a good fit. Like you say, the character stuff isn’t exactly a huge red flag (he went to the combine at least and didn’t leave).
Though choice if he, Bulaga and Williams are on the board. Still think I go with Bulaga, he’s a mean nasty bastard.
Davis would not be a bad pick, and maybe he’s staying home from his pro day cuz he wants to remain in Jersey?
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 11, 2010 12:42 PM EST up reply actions
Ya he’s got the strength and finesse to play either side. I think he just needs the right mentoring. TC isn’t going to put up with nonsense, and with O’Hara there I like the combination. He’s just not very intelligent at all. (That’s still an understatement)
Bulaga and Williams would also be really good picks. Where ever Davis goes, if he can get the right coaching, I think it’s more than likely that he would be the best OT from the class. But again that’s a BIG if. I just think that TC could be that guy.
Also on a semi-related note: The C from Rutgers Ryan Blaszyck (definitely not spelt right but it’s really difficult) is trying out for a few teams. He’d be another good fit for the line. He’s more than likely going to be an undrafted free agent so I think it might be worth the Giants’ time to go and take a look at that as a back-up for O’Hara.
by ny12giants92 on Mar 11, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions
hmmm......
Our boy O’Hara was undrafted from Rutgers too.
Definitely, I think the Giants need a C to backup. O’hara’s a rock of course…and probably has a lot left in the tank (like say…Kevin Mawae) but yea, developing a C has got to be a priority, and not a guy making a position switch like Koets.
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 11, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions
Not sure how you spell that C from Rutgers ...
but it’s pronounced “Ball-sack”. I think he’s from Scotrun, N.J.
I also like Bulaga
I wouldnt mind having him. As JR said Beatty has a LT skill set. He isnt (or hasnt shown yet) that he is a good run blocker. Bulaga has that mentality. Putting him next to Snee out right side would be set for a while. And at LG next to Beatty isnt to bad either.
Need is RT not LT
AFTER we address holes on D.
But if a stud drops to 15 so be it. Davis would not seem to be that player.
The question I have is this: “If McKenzie graded out well in 2009 what is the downside to trying to get one more year out of him?”
Personally I like the idea of getting younger sooner. Of drafting a RT. And there is the $4+ million in salary and his injury history.
But – if we could get 13-14 quality games out of him at RT and we have a passable backup – does that change priorities for rounds 1-4?
Giants have a lot of areas to address on D.
Beatty is our LT
I really believe Beatty is the LT of the future which means if we are looking at tackle this draft it is for the right side. Will there be good RT candidates later in the draft?
Read he was very late to combine interviews and was always last guy to show up for anything
If Giants draft him, its to kill Coach C
Just the reason...
I really would pass on Davis. There are other talent in this draft, who have better character and work hard. What happens when this guy gets paid? You think he will keep up a high level of intensity? These questions are of course hypotheticals, since I don’t this guy, never met him. But, if he is already showing up late to interviews and activities during the combine, I do not get a good feeling then. The combine is a job interview. If someone that I was viewing as a potential employee showed up late to an interview, I would throw the resume out right away. Simple as that.
There are some problems with him
but you cannot question his talent. If Reese thinks he will be a good player I wouldn’t have a problem with him getting drafted.
I prefer both Williams or this guy to a no-upside guy like Bulaga though
by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 11, 2010 1:44 PM EST reply actions
Incredibly small number of posts for a very high level prospect
This guy must have really turned people off
there’s other posts for the daily McClain babble.
No CJ Spiller in here either, that’s usually good for some stone throwing.
BTW…Tim Tebow sucks (maybe that starts something!)
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 11, 2010 3:49 PM EST up reply actions
There's 2 that think Tebow would be a better pick then a defensive lineman.
And I $h1T you not.
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 11, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions
Here's an oldie but goodie for you Free
Trade up and draft Suh!
I'd take him
I am all for taking him. I’m thinking that maybe we don’t have any Desperate holes. I’d MUCH prefer a Defence 1st Draft, but I also like value. If no S, or DL, or MLB fits the chart… I’m a big fan of bolstering the trenches! When in doubt, go to the O-Line, always.
Tebow sucks. :)
#15
I think we can all agree we shouldn’t be picking as high as #15 for quite awhile(hopefully), and top tier OT’s usually don’t drop. Therefore if one of these guys is available I think JR snags ‘em. Personally I’m a Bulaga guy too, I like his toughness, and frankly I don’t care that he has short arms. I hope teams pass him thinking he won’t cut it at LT…cuz we need him to be a RT!
I Am Tobikan Judan
I would love to know ...
exactly what they mean by "performed poorly during the interviews ". I’ve never seen a Youtube highlight/lowlight reel on interviews, so I’m wondering what they see that they feel will translate into poor “performance” of the real kind.
And assuming we think he is not a real “motivation problem” (taking plays off ala Moss doesn’t get your QB killed at WR), then I agree with the consensus here that you don’t take this guy at # 15 if we feel Beatty is best suited to LT, and that Davis would be a RT (it’s a cap thing … remember that old chestnut ?). If you can tradew way down in the 1st round and still get him, sort of like Loadholdt for the Vikes in ’09, than fine.
Davis..this is what makes scouting and coaching so difficult..
You take a chance on a guy like this and you wind up showing him the exit door, then once in awhile you have a star performer on your table..Davis is a craps-shoot.. Too many sure bets than to roll a snake-eyes.
"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"
Another day, another "project"....
I’d pass on this one as well.
I'll take him
I think he would make a great RT. It would even make sense to let McKenzie play out his contract and mentor him. This is where the lack of team leadership really hurts. LT was a head case too, but Carson kept him focused on the field. If Burress was still around, this would be real trouble. We would need to get Davis a buddy.
I keep seeing this “Bulaga has no upside” nonsense. He doesn’t need an upside. He was the best tackle in college football. He blocked everybody. The best guy never has an upside. Peyton Manning has no upside either. Should Indy cut him?
Strange comparison… Peyton’s already reached his astronomical upside at 30+ years old. He had tons of upside left a decade ago.
The problem with Bulaga is that he’s only 20 or so, but lacks upside. Yes he’s a blue-collar kinda guy who works hard, but he isn’t especially athletic and has really average arm length. He’s the best college tackle because Coach Ferentz is a master of maximizing technique in players with questionable instincts and measurables. His tackles get to the NFL and just don’t have that “it” factor you need to succeed at LT (Rob Gallery).
Quick, can you think of an “elite” LT who isn’t an athletic freak? When I see Bulaga, I immediately think of Diehl. He’s adequate, very good even at times, on the left edge. But he was never going to be elite.
With a first round pick, I’d rather take someone who worked hard and has some kind of upside. Bruce Campbell, IMO, is a much better prospect than either Bulaga or Davis. An athletic monster with lightning fast reflexes while mirroring and Michael Jackson’s feet?
+1
Walter Jones and Orlando Pace didn’t become HoF LT’s by just having good technique. You need to be athletic as well to be able to handle the D-Wares of the world 1 on 1 with no help
by mclaren_is_the_best on Mar 12, 2010 7:59 AM EST up reply actions
which side
We are talking about right tackles here. I think we have pretty much decided that Beatty will get his shot at left tackle. So we are not looking for great athleticism. We are looking for a solid, dependable performer that will block his guy every play. Bulaga may not be pretty, but he will get the job done. I would have no trouble with him on either side.
I wish we could have 50 David Diehls on this team. I prefer guys that work hard and give 150% than guys with more talent that fail to use it.
Yea I don't understand it either...
Especially if cutting Kareem McCkenzie is an option and they want a RT right away, Bulaga aside from Russ Okung is probably the most ready to start.
Upside? He’s a nasty bastard at RT. That’s what he’s gonna be. His arm length isn’t a big issue on the right side. His athleticism neither.
I’ve seen Bulaga off the board as high as the Redskins at #4 (Okung’s off the board…or sometimes ahead of Okung).
If I was ranking tackles, I’d go…
1) Okung – elite LT, excellent pass blocker
2) Bulaga – solid LT, potentially elite RT (good for the GIants)
3) Anthony Davis – elite potential, strong bust potenial with his concerns
4) Charles Brown- at 303 lbs, not a good option for the Giants…cuz of Beatty..but excellent prospect
5) Bruce Campbell- Al Davis is having wet dreams about him, but very high boom or bust with him (pass)
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 12, 2010 8:24 AM EST up reply actions
I’ve seen Bulaga compared to Jake Long.
and I’ve heard that he stinks cuz he didn’t block well against Brandon Graham…..no one blocked Brandon Graham in college ( Brandon Graham = Trent Cole)
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 12, 2010 8:27 AM EST up reply actions
Any reason you put Campbell in front of Trent Williams
I’d probably place him either 3rd or 4th (not sure between him and Davis)
Davis and Campbell have more potential
and Charles Brown’s only problem is he’s not heavy enough for the NFL just yet (eating a lot can be helped)
Master of the squeegee
by FreeBradshaw on Mar 12, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions

by 

























