Big Blue View: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Network Message: 50% Off: CBS/SB Nation Fantasy Baseball

Ex-GM: Osi worth a No. 1 or No. 2 pick

A No. 1 or No. 2 draft pick. That is the price a former NFL general manager who wished to remain anonymous says Osi Umenyiora could fetch if the New York Giants decided to deal him this off-season.

So, put yourself in General Manager Jerry Reese's shoes. We have already spent some time the past several weeks talking vaguely about trading, or not trading, the obviously disgruntled defensive end. In reality, though, we had no baseline for an argument since we have all been speculating wildly on what he might bring in return.

But, on the theory that Umenyiora's still formidable pass-rushing skills could bring the Giants an additional first- or second-round pick would you keep him or trade him?

I am not a guy who favors trading up for draft picks. That is a gamble that sometimes works, but often blows up on the team doing it. If, however, the Giants could add an extra pick in the first two rounds --  a scenario I still have doubts about -- that is a pretty tempting proposition.

What teams might make an offer for Osi, especially with a shrinking number of teams playing the 4-3? That is another question entirely, and I would just be speculating. St. Louis with Steve Spagnuolo, maybe, but they would be silly to surrender draft picks.

Your thoughts?

(E-mail Ed at bigblueview@gmail.com)

0 recs  |  Comment 112 comments  |  Add comment |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

To me, this hinges on two questions ...

1. Is Osi only a passing down rusher, or will he be O.K. for full-time duty with an extra year of healing ? (and in today’s NFL, esp. against teams like the Eagles, what’s a passing down anyway ?)

2. What is Sintim’s natural position – full-time linebacker or situational pass rusher ? Haven’t seen enough of him to know, but coaching staff should have an idea by now.

If we really could get a #1 or high #2, that would be tempting, unless we think Osi will be O.K. and can be adequate against the run. Extra draft pick could be a LB if Sintim going more to DE.

And IMO, Osi’s malcontent act will not go away unless he gets a new contract. That is clearly the motive beneath all the BS.

by Shofner85 on Feb 9, 2010 7:10 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

In reading the threads i'm interested...

This seems like a very Patriots thing to do…see Richard Seymour last year. I think it’s brilliant. Given that we potentially extend our teams sucess for years to come. Don’t even hesitate on this one.

by nyGTrenches on Feb 9, 2010 12:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If they really can't see him fitting in...

then yea, why not?

I think they could get that first rounder, lesser talents and less proven have gotten high second rounders.

A team like Seattle could really use a pass rusher. Maybe they’re desperate enough to give the Giants #14?

Actually..given that Osi probably comes back to ‘form’ in 2010, I hold out for the 1st rounder and nothing else. Unless we’re getting players involved

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 7:14 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I would keep Osi

He had a bad year coming off a knee surgery, he was frustrated and ran his mouth a little bit, he didnt say anything too bad. Strahan has talked to him and said he will be fine and will play. Our strength in 2007 was DE’s and getting to the QB, why would we start to get of our strength. The Giants run a 4-3 defense and when healthy, Osi is one of the best DE’s in a 4-3. And I have said this before, I love Justin Tuck, but he still has not had a year that is close to Osi’s best year.

by NJDuke on Feb 9, 2010 7:20 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Trade him

and accept the best offer.

As he may be a role player I would consider taking a 3rd for him.

by G Fan in England on Feb 9, 2010 7:33 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Because you think he will blow up the locker room?

Otherwise it pays to wait for the best offer.

Braylon Edwards brought a 3 and then some. Osi has to have more value than that. Especially on draft day. A vet like Osi might have more appeal than Greg Hardy (a likely 2nd round pick or late first rounder) who has hi risk/hi reward written all over him.

by giantblue63 on Feb 9, 2010 11:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He may blow up

the locker room.

I am more concerned about him playing and RB’s running past him as if he was not there.

Good teams know when to move on with players.

I would rather not price him out of the market and we end up keeping him!

by G Fan in England on Feb 9, 2010 4:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In general

I have no special allegiance to any player. If they get good value for Osi, its OK with me. I thought they got undercut on Shockey but in truth I am little surprised he came back this year.

I expect Osi to improve from last year, it almost always happens coming off big surgery.

But Reese got more for Shockey off a broken leg than the Browns got for a healthy younger Braylon Edwards, so I figure he will do what has to be done

by giantblue63 on Feb 9, 2010 6:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think you have to trade him

Osi’s childish ultimatum of start or quit has stripped the Giants new DC of the authority he needs. If you keep Osi there are 2 outcomes:
1. He plays his heart out in camp, earns the majority of snaps for the season, and to everyone it looks like Fewell is taking orders from a player. Kiwanuka has resentment. Bad for chemistry.
2. He gets outplayed in camp and doesn’t get the nod from Fewell or Coughlin for his throne. He retires, leaving the Giants with jack. Or he pouts on the sideline, ruins chemistry, and doesn’t contribute.
So you trade Osi, because those outcomes suck.
I think the best attack would be to replace your known commodity with a known commodity. We ought to dump — not package, unless it’s with a bum like Sinorice Moss and definitely not with picks — dump Osi for a straight up pick.
With the money cleared from Osi — I don’t know what he makes — you have to go out and sign a good, established DE. Maybe it’s not Seymour or Peppers, but a known proven quantity who WILL fill the void.
Then, take best advantage of the pick you got. Sure, it’s overall a little more money, but as a fan I am worth it.
Now, if you want to talk trading say our #15 & 20 (maybe that’s what we’d get for Osi?) for #10 to get McClain, that’sa whole new convo…

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Feb 9, 2010 7:33 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

agreed

the giants proved that no player is bigger than the team or the system(even if that system sucked). Osi shot his mouth off about Sheridan like he was a member of the BBV, only problem… Sheridan was his boss.
Coughlin then demotes him to a backup.
Now you got a new DC in town who’s gonna be held hostage by his players? ie. start OSI even if he isn’t the best option, Because if ya don’t he’ll throw another temper tantrum.
the scenario sucks.
He could be clogging up the position when we clearly have other options… all cause he thinks he’s better than we do.
Ego doesn’t make tackles, arguments don’t win championships.
IMO
Trade Him. Get draft picks. Buy Peppers. Move on. It’s an uncapped year as of right now… lets play the free agent market like we’re the F’n Yankees

by Flynner on Feb 9, 2010 9:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

F Peppers....

he’s worse the Osi with the bitching.

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 10:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

....go ahead and trade him

but dont come crying back here on this post when he puts up 15-17 sacks in a season for another team

by NJDuke on Feb 9, 2010 7:42 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Osi's last good year was 2005

that’s 5 years ago. He was out for a lot of 2006. He put up almost half of his 13 sacks in 2007 in one game (incredible game…), 2008 he was out and 2009 he was what he was.

Justin Tuck surpassed Osi in 2007. Tuck’s 2008 was a lot better then any Osi year too.

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 7:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He would have to have

one hell of a DT duo settinf him up while having the opposing RB run right into him. No way he manages 15-17 sacks.

by brisulph on Feb 9, 2010 8:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Duke

he honestly MAY have a great season somewhere else, but I don’t think he’d have that same season here…

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Feb 9, 2010 9:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That always happens to us anyhow.

We get rid of a player and they flourish wherever they go. Time after time after time.

We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.

by GAgiantfan on Feb 9, 2010 12:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

2005?

Osi had 13 sacks and 40 tackles in 2007, not a good year? Tucks best year, 2008 51 tackles 12 sacks, thats pretty close to me! and not even Osi’s best year! Osi in 2005 14.5 and 49 tackles, better then any Tuck year. Oh and by the way Osi had more sacks last year then Tuck, which they both are DE’s in a 4-3 defense, which their job is to sack the QB. And when healthy, they are one of the best 1-2 punch in the NFL, so lets not go trading away one of them, because he had an off year after major knee surgery.

by NJDuke on Feb 9, 2010 7:55 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

no one's trading Osi cuz of his injury or performance...

lets just get that out of the way.

Its cuz of his mouth. He’s spewing off at the mouth and he’s a distraction. Why would the team trade Jeremy Shockey, one of the better TE weapons in the NFL, for their developing QB? Because he has a big annoying mouth, that’s why.

And like I said………Osi had 13 sacks in 2007…..but Osi had 6 sacks in one game. Its a great game. He also had a couple sacks in the Niner game too.

Tuck’s 12 sacks were spread out (and he had 10 in 2007 as a part time player)

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 7:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Osi couldn't tie Strahan

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 8:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree....

All Im saying is Osi, shot off his mouth and said that he wants to start, thats a good thing, we want him to want to start, he was embrassed by his 2009 season and being benched. He isnt demanding to be started, he is saying that if he doesnt return to the starting role player he was he would quit, no one actually believes he is gonna retire

..it was the end of a bad season, he had a bad taste in his mouth, give the guy a break

by NJDuke on Feb 9, 2010 8:11 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and to add

Since he publicly has stated he was a embarassed of his play, he will come back like a player on a contract year. ready to prove any and everyone wrong..

i have had ideas of trading him.. b/c of the kiwi(who imo isnt a everydown DE) and sintim(who is unproven as a LB or DE) ..but we dont really have a strong case for anyone behind him.. I say let him work hard and prove his worth.

unless we get a 1st rounder.. in a way…sometimes… maybe : ) lol

by semsemma on Feb 9, 2010 9:58 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Also

Media portrayal of his comments always conveniently exclude the fact that he seemed very low key during entire “controversial” interview.

He is basically getting roasted for speaking his mind and saying what we all expect him to think privately. I can’t get myself all worked up over that.

As for meeting with the coach and GM, can’t see how that is an issue. Are they so busy they can’t chat with Osi over lunch??

by giantblue63 on Feb 9, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's not an issue

Even if Coughlin and Reese aren’t busy, they are in charge of the team, Osi is not in charge of them. They will not bend over backwards for any player, especially over what is a contract issue.

by KumaBlue42 on Feb 9, 2010 3:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We have been over this one before

Six of those sacks came in ONE game. That means seven sacks in the other 15, including several games where he made NO tackles. Very mediocre. He has had one great game since 2005, but he has not been a great player. I have made this point many times, and ‘Free’ is correct.

by Ed Valentine on Feb 9, 2010 8:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

4 career Def TDs....

Osi makes big plays with the ball on defense. Do you think Tuck has a great season without Osi on the other side and Kiwi coming in off the bench. This 3 man rotation is a great one and they should keep it together

by NJDuke on Feb 9, 2010 8:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

sense 2005

Osi has 10 forced fumbles and scored 2 touchdowns sense the 2005 season, I think some of those were great games

by NJDuke on Feb 9, 2010 8:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hope the anonymous GM

is correct. If he is, then a trade for Osi could would likely be win-win for him and the Giants. If I was a GM, I’d never give up a # 1 for him.

by blue gonz on Feb 9, 2010 8:01 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Gaines Adams (RIP)

was about as big a bust as a #3 overall pick can get. Made as much as Osi too. GOt a 2nd round pick.

Sometimes, you gotta rely on how dumb some GM’s are (too bad Jerry Angelo doesn’t have a first rounder…..)

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 8:02 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Come to think,

I’d be hard pressed to give up a # 2. Maybe to get rid of a headache? One thing to remember: Osi’s JR’s boy. He had to scream and pound on the table to get Accorsi to select him.

by blue gonz on Feb 9, 2010 10:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Trade creates need

If Osi is traded, then the Giants need another DE to replace him in the rotation. If they get a good draft pick (first or high second), then they should be able to get a good one – maybe one who can play both the pass and the run. They can only afford to use the pick to trade up if they get a DE in free agency, and even then they have enough needs that I would only trade up if they solve another of their problems – safety or middle linebacker – in free agency as well. (Note that if they make Sintim a DE they create a need at linebacker – it just moves the problem.)
If they can get a good draft pick, he should be traded, to create a better atmosphere around the team and to remind the rest of the players that there are consequences to shooting your mouth off, especially when the problem is your own poor play.

Mickey C

by Mickey C on Feb 9, 2010 8:05 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Draft DE? Plenty of prospects in the draft for that

Move Sintim to LB? Can draft people, can give Kehl a shot.

Osi was OK in 2009, its not like we’re trading away a really important piece (if they do this…)

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 8:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

if traded

sign a good veteran DE in FA. End of hole. No mving, no chances taken

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Feb 9, 2010 9:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I've been saying this for weeks

It’s nice that someone who has real NFL GM experience agrees. If Gaines Adams could be traded for a 2nd round pick, then Osi is worth a first. If Shockey, a player who was injured in 2007 and malcontent, could be traded for a 2nd and a 5th, then Osi is worth a 1st.

by GhostDini on Feb 9, 2010 8:19 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

sheeeet....

I forgot about the Shockey trade for a second! He’s also a TE…which I don’t think is valued as much as a pass rusher.

I’m asking for a 1st and 3rd!! (I’d settle for a 1st and a 4th)

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 8:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Just wondering

Would you trade Ose and our #1 for the #1 pick in this draft?

by Jolly on Feb 9, 2010 9:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Feb 9, 2010 9:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 10:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No doubt

A chance to grad Suh or McCoy (I know Mayock has McCoy ahead), and then get a DE at 15, could really change the pass rush.

The team would still have needs at S and MLB, but my guess is that the pass rush would make some of their current players look a lot better (Call it the Gibril Syndrome)

by giantblue63 on Feb 9, 2010 12:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Whooops

had us trading and using our pick at 15 :(

by giantblue63 on Feb 9, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Who's this GM?

I want him in my fantasy football league next year.

A team would have to be pretty dumb to trade a 1 for a DE that has all of the following working against him…

- A liability against the run.
- Just one year removed from a very serious injury (torn lateral meniscus), and the season after the injury was perhaps the worst of his career.
- Big contract (He signed a 6 year deal for $41 million at the end of the 2005 season, and expires after the 2011season), that he also happens to be unhappy with.
- Has a history of bitching.
- Will be 29 halfway through next season.
- His one major strength (rushing the QB) might be a little overrated.

I’m not saying there isn’t a possibility some fool is willing to trade their 1 (or even their 2 for that matter) for Osi, but I sure as hell wouldn’t want it to be my team.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Feb 9, 2010 8:30 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Osi talks

as if he wants off the Giants. I’m sure JR would oblige him IF he can find a deal he is comfortable with making. My gut tells me that Osi will have a very good year this coming season due in part to the pressure he has put on himself with all the mouthing. …….accidental motivation if you will.

I think he’ll also have a better year, because I expect the tackle and line backer play to be better. If we could add some strength at safety I think this team, as well as Osi will have a good season.

by Jolly on Feb 9, 2010 8:49 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Osi

I would trade him for a one and maybe even Rams 2nd round pick(1st pick of the 2nd rd) but other then that I keep him and see if he still has it… He’s acting pretty darn close to what Shockster did so he don’t deserve to be a Giant if he keeps it up… But only trade him if we get someone to over pay..

All's Well that Fewell

by gobs56 on Feb 9, 2010 9:21 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

One guy that wouldnt trade Osi away....

I know one guy that wouldnt trade Osi away, and would probably love to trade for Osi, if he could….and that is Spags

by NJDuke on Feb 9, 2010 9:36 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

disagree

The Rams need someone who could contribute for 10 years right now.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Feb 9, 2010 9:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

he probably loved Strahan too

that doesn’t mean he’s going to trade the team’s future to have the guy for a few years.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Feb 9, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

left end vs. right end, taking a chance in the draft

Strahan and Tuck play left end. It is very hard to find a left end who plays both the run and pass well – look at the Pro Bowl rosters over the last 10 years, except for Strahan/Tuck they are almost exclusively right ends, the guys that put up the big sack numbers. So a 12-sack Tuck is much more valuable than a 13-sack Osi.

That being said, early DE picks suffer one of the biggest bust rates in the draft. Gaines Adams. Jamaal Anderson. Derrick Harvey (still has a shot). Courtney Brown – #1 overall some years back, nobody has heard of him. Everyone can name others. So it is difficult to guarantee replacement. If you trade Osi, you need to give Kiwanuka a long-term deal since he is reaching his free agent years.

I think if you get a good offer, you definitely have to consider it.

by ct17 on Feb 9, 2010 9:40 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Bad Idea!

1st of all you dont trade a guy with this much talent. Osi had a bad yr… majority of that was because Bill Sherdian is a monron who has no concept of dwn and distance. He didnt play the run well this yr but when Spags was there he did well. He had 7 sacks which was the team leader coming off his surgey. He would have had more if Sherdian didnt try 2 zone blitz the whole game or stay in cover 2 on 3rd and 10. Kiwi is good but even if he had a good yr it will neva be the same impact as Osi’s. Teams have 2 take a te or a rb 2 chip him in passing dwns because if you leave him 1on1 with the tackle it’s a sack! Theres only a couple but Osi can rush the passer wit a combo of moves unlike Freeny who has his famous spin move and the last couple of yrs he developed a bull rush. When Strahan was there you could see that Osi developed into a pass rusher just like him but he has more speed than Strahan. With that being said Fewell took medicore talent in Buffalo and they had decent defenses. Now you come 2 a team that there strenghth is the d-line… Osi and Tuck will get a lot of oppurtunity’s 2 get 2 the QB. Kiwi will be in the rotation but you neva trade a guy like Osi unless he becomes a cancer and he hasnt been that since his time with the G-Men!

by Taj 13 on Feb 9, 2010 10:02 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

True, Osi has more speed than Stray ...

but he needs more than one move. He needs to learn a better bull rush or Freeney-like spin, to keep the LT honest. I wish Stray could teach Osi to play with leverage the way he did. That helps not only the bull rush but the run defense.

by Shofner85 on Feb 9, 2010 10:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Good Point

This is a good pt. but Osi’s game is all about speed. The leverage part is mad tru and only sum1 with a football i.q. would talk about that. Strahan was a freak of nature the way he played with leverage and thats what made his game so great either rushing the passer or playin the run. The one thing I will say though is that it is very hard 2 blk a speed rusher who uses his hands very well. In a way he uses his hands as a boxer thats why I think Osi doesnt play with leverage like Strahan or Tuck. If he did play with better leverage I think he would play the run a lot better. If he played with 2 much leverage rushing the passer the tackle would blk him all day because his game is about his speed and hands unlike Strahan or Tuck. Great point though!

by Taj 13 on Feb 9, 2010 11:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Osi's lack of leverage

could be a side effect of the surgery. You get power from your legs (not your upper body), so if he didn’t trust his knee, and wouldn’t plant 100% it would cause him to look weak.

by giantblue63 on Feb 9, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Everybody must be bored

This really is a non-topic. Osi isn’t going anywhere and who wants to bet that he has a monster year in 2010?

If anything, he is a prideful individual, deserving or not. I believe he wants a better contract and he knows he’s not getting anything without a good year at a more lofty performance level. This may have us ready to send him walking, but to trade him for an unknown quantity is just foolish. He’s “the devil we know” and that devil was one of the best pass rushing ends in the game not too long ago. We’re so quick to dismiss players and talk trade like this is fantasy football. FYI: It’s not.

With all the uncertainty regarding the CBA, draft picks are at a premium and teams aren’t eager to deal unless it’s lopsided in their favor. Nobody is giving a #1 for a DE who has yet to show anything special since surgery. He is also only due around $3M, which you would have to spend on a 1st rd. rookie with unknown immediate impact.

To further illustrate the stupidity of even considering dumping Osi, I give you the fact that he hasn’t called out the coaching staff(ala Tiki, Shockey and Feely) or fellow players (Tiki(re:Strahan contract dispute)). All he did was vent frustration at his current situation, demonstrating immaturity and a lack of discretion. It will all cool over by training camp and everyone on here will be saying how we’re glad we kept him once he plays up to contract negotiating level. His agent will make sure of it.

Hey, I’ll admit that I have reacted similarily to his whining out loud(calling for his head), but let’s all do a reality check.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 10:33 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Sort of lean

in your direction Sun, though no one on this defense is irreplaceable. If Osi calms down, I agree that he could have a productive year. Maybe Fewell can talk him off the ledge.

by Jolly on Feb 9, 2010 10:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Unfortunately, I think it's about money ...

isn’t it always with players “unhappy with their role” ? Osi has same agent as Stray did, and Osi complained about his contract before camp int 2008 (like Stray did before 2007 season). After missing 2008 with injury and sucking in 2009, he can’t exactly complain directly about the contract, so now “it’s about pride”.

He either wants:

A. A new contract from Giants
B. A trade where he’ll get a new contract from new team to lock him up further.
C. Be a starter in 2009, so he can re-establish his value, will complain loudly in off season about needing a new deal, and then see A and B above.

by Shofner85 on Feb 9, 2010 10:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll bet on C

but if he DOES have a contract worthy season, JR will entertain discussions with Osi’s agent. I just hope Osi’s smart enough to let his play do the talking. He hasn’t shown much in the restraint department, lately.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 10:56 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I agree ...

if he comes back strong, “A” will likely happen (after the lock-out), although I think Osi is very scripted at the moment. Notice how his words are inflammatory, but when you listen to the interviews he is very amiable and non-confrontational.

He will, however, have to earn plan “C”. No-one’s just handing him back the starting job, and his “quitting” line is laughable, as he could never re-establish his worth, and would lose millions.

by Shofner85 on Feb 9, 2010 11:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think Stray shed light on the "he's going nowhere" deal.

He’s just blowing off smoke. "Stop saying stupid ‘stuff’ "

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 11:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And I loved Strahan's other quote:

“I said the same mess, ‘I ain’t coming back.’

Call me paranoid, but I think Stray is just playing “good cop” while Osi does his “bad cop” schtick. He doesn’t want to talk himself out of town as “damaged goods”, so they need to walk a fine line.

by Shofner85 on Feb 9, 2010 11:14 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Would take

him for another year IF he will re-establish his value, for the only way he could do that would be to play well.

by Jolly on Feb 9, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly!

He(or at least, his agent) knows that he won’t get much of a contract anywhere unless he has the leverage of a good season under his belt.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 10:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This sounds like Ed talks to a former high Lions official/broadcaster....

     I wouldn’t give a #1 pick in this draft for Osi. I wouldn’t give a #2 for him either, but I have seen stranger things happen and if Ed’s contact really is in the ballpark of what a sane administrator would trade, I’d have Osi out of here by the end of the week so we could speculate on what to do with our TWO #1 picks.
     Osi MIGHT be better than he was last year, he MIGHT be the same and more of a distraction. He didn’t defend the run enough to make it worhwhile to use him as he wants to use. A #1 draft choice is a gamble, and he MIGHT not work out, but at this point I’d rather gamble with a young 21-year-old not coming off an injury, filling a position of need, and with a whole career ahead of him. I’m not saying Osi MUST go, just that he’s made himself an greater uncertainty health and attidude wise than a #1 or #2 draft pick, and I’d move him to better the team, not to get rid of him. For a #1 pick, I’d even help him pack.

by Cranky50 on Feb 9, 2010 10:33 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Oh, and by the way.......

What NFL team wouldn’t pay $3M for 7 sacks a few forced fumbles with one returned for 6?

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 10:37 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

If they could get a 1st round pick I wouldnt mind doing it,

but im not dying to get rid of him. I do think he will have a better year next season. I will say that if JR starts looking into this he better get a trade done. If Osi hears he was really being shopped we could have a Jay Cutler situation on our hands. Osi seems a little sensitive.

by Giants56 on Feb 9, 2010 10:39 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

JR will wait....

We have to wait until at least 3/5 when the league year starts, but Reese won’t do a thing until we have a better idea of the CBA situation. Too much is up in the air and, besides, who trades away pass rushers? Besides Reggie White going to the Packers, I haven’t seen much of this kind of trade. It’s definitely never been too successful for the teams that gave one up.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 10:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Could happen sooner ...

as no CBA in 2010 is a done deal, and it’s looking highly likely for a lock-out in 2011 (at which point we will all be hanging ourselves).

by Shofner85 on Feb 9, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Which impacts the draft pick situation.

No CBA means uncapped, which means 212 players that would have been UFA’s will be RFA’s, there is the looming possibility of a lock-out(and no draft) in 2011 and teams will be hording draft picks.

We are simply better off just keeping him and taking advantage of him playing for a contract. We(and he and his agent) will have more bargaining power if his value goes up, and if there’s no football in 2011, he’ll be out of luck(as will we).

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 11:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm just saying that ...

I think it’s a foregone conclusion that there will be no CBA, so the UFA’s to RFA’s situation you correctly cite is likely in JR’s (and other GM’s) thinking already. That’s why I wouldn’t be shocked if this type of deal got done before 3/5.

by Shofner85 on Feb 9, 2010 11:10 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

See below

The NFL is technically closed for business until the start of the league year, so the only transactions that can be made are either off of waivers or internally to a franchise, such as contract extensions with players already on their roster. There can be no transactions between franchises until 3/5. There is NO exception to this rule, so RFA’s & UFA’s, draft picks and anything else other than coaching staffs cannot change hands during this period.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 11:16 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, also......

even new contracts will not be approved by the league until league year begins.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 11:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Osi is done with the gmen

We are talking about a de who is undersized and needs his knee to be fully healthy for the speed he once had. And as far as I go, I trust JR in the draft. He hasn’t failed us yet. Get the first rounder for him and get a guy off this team that will only be a distraction. He already was this year.

by leavy on Feb 9, 2010 10:54 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

not much 2 sign in FA

everybody is old or restricted. only kampman would be worth it . peppers likes 2 chirp alittle much 4 me.

by Troy O on Feb 9, 2010 12:05 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

See how he does in camp/preseason

then you could trade him for a 2011 pick or keep him if hes a team player/deemed worth it. Coming back from his injury and having what was essentially a rehab year, we would be selling low.

by ryanwk628 on Feb 9, 2010 12:05 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Back on the Safety Thread....

Here is the list of First Round safeties from 2006 to the present (notice there are not many):

Laron Landry
Mike Griffin
Reggie Nelson
Brandon Merriweather
Mike Huff
Donte Whitner
Jason Allen
Kenny Phillips

Which of those is “worth” a first round pick or has made a measurable impact?
No thanks. We need to get better value.

by dubsrub on Feb 9, 2010 12:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Mike Griffen is one of the best safeties in the league

Huff plays on the Raiders so he doesn’t count for much, but actually he’s been coming into his own lately. KP is good. Whitner probably same as Huff or KP, when he’s on the field he’s pretty good.

Merriweather miraculously made the Pro Bowl, so he wasn’t all bad. The Redskins don’t use Landry right.

So actually…yea, I’d take a safety

Go head and bring up the DT’s since 2006

Here

Halot Ngata
John McCargo
Broderick Bunkley
Amobi Okoye
Justin Harrell
Glenn Dorsey
SedrickEllis
Kentwan Ballmer
BJRaji
Peria Jerry
Ziggy Hood

That’s 11 DT’s vs 8 safeties.

I count Ngata as the only star. Bunkely, Ellis and Dorsey are pretty solid. The rest aren’t or complete busts

Not all that different then safety. Certainly not enough to go and say safety’s a waste of a first rounder.

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 12:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Which is why it usually pays...

to take the BPA unless it is a position that is stocked. And even then, at some positions depth is a blessing.

People skewer the Kiwi/Holmes deal. But at the time Holmes was hardly a slam dunk, at least 1/2 the scouts liked Sinorice Moss better.

by giantblue63 on Feb 9, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

exactly

I think that’s why people don’t like the Kiwi deal…cuz it involved Santonio Holmes, who’s a damn good WR.

All things told, given how each has played out for each team, I take Kiwi over Holmes.

Who knows, Santonio could’ve flamed out just like Moss with the Giants (and Moss could’ve been successful if he went to the Steelers.

It seems if your a 2nd round WR drafted by the Giants, not named Steve Smith or Amani Toomer….you stink.

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 2:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Weren’t Terrell Thomas, Corey Webster, Chris Snee, and Tiki Barber all 2’s?

by Bye, Dawk :( on Feb 9, 2010 3:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh duh, you said 2nd round WR’s… Oops.

by Bye, Dawk :( on Feb 9, 2010 3:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not sure.....

if Santonio Holmes would have survived the early trouble he was in had he been on the Giants. Our management team would have likely dumped and ran.

Off topic, is it eating at anyone else that Shockey now has 2 rings?

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 6:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

no.

to me, he’s only got 3/4 of one anyway. He didn’t play for the Giants during the playoffs and I think the Saints wouldn’t have needed him to win. He did something tho.

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 6:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

sure!

for the sake of time…click on this

I’ll just say that as with any draft….basically, draft history is irrelevant. Each team has a greater need.

Also, there may be more first round talents at one position then other years and are worth the 1st rounder.

This year…I’d say Rolando McClain’s the only LB definitely worthy of a 1st round pick, tho players like Sergio Kindle, Jerry Hughes, Ricky Sapp and Brandon Graham, all could be first rounders, but they are rush LB’s (Kindle might be the only one who could be like Orakpo and be a SAM backer…but the Giants don’t need a SAM backer)

Guys like Spikes, Weatherspoon, Bowman and Washington, I don’t see them as first rounders unless some team is reaching for them.

…at least right now. They could all blow away their combine/pro day and really ‘be first rounders’/

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 4:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Didn't we go over this already?

Osi’s mouth isn’t a distraction, and (like most other times an athlete opens his mouth) his words were taken out of context. To me it sounded like he knows that he has to play better and prove that he is worthy of the starting spot. Any anyway a starter is just a name nowadays, especially with all the 3 WR sets and the like you often need to have your best pass rushers on the field at the same time which will mean Osi, Kiwi and Tuck playing together.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Feb 9, 2010 3:29 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

+1

I thought we had done with this and that the general feeling was … we like that Osi knows he had a bad year and that he is saying we wants to be a starter … surely we want that desire don’t we? All this talk of trade is (dare I say it without getting shot down) off-season media fodder.

They've done studies you know, 60% of the time, it works everytime.

by Johannus on Feb 9, 2010 4:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We did, but ...

We didn’t have a guy with experience making these kinds of decisions giving us a real basis for the discussion by framing it within a real price tag. Having that info is the only reason I went down this road again.

by Ed Valentine on Feb 9, 2010 4:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well if we can get a first rounder for him I think that would be a good deal

but a lot of people here were saying that he is turning into “a cancer” and that his mouth is “a distraction” which I do not agree with.

If they were to trade him it should be because JR / TC feel that they can improve the team with that extra pick not because of Osi’s attitude (which in my opinion has not been detrimental to the team. He seemingly was the only one that was mad and disappointed with the loss to the Panthers in Giants stadium but even after that he said that he loved the Giants organization)

by mclaren_is_the_best on Feb 9, 2010 4:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Trade Osi for Ndamukong Suh

by trading Osi and our number 1 pick for St. Louis Rams No. 1 pick. This will benefit both the giants and the Rams. We’ll have the baller DT we need and Rams will have a DE better than any a 1st round can get as well as a first round pick if they want to pick up a QB

by Footballs on Feb 9, 2010 6:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

It wouldn't add up.....

to enough to bridge the value needed to move from 15 to #1. #15 is worth 1,050 points and #1 is worth 3,000, so Osi would have to equal a 4 or 3 in value (1,800 and 2,200, respectively). I’m doubtful that he grades better than a mid second round, considering his coming off the injury, coupled with modest performance last season. Unfortunately, the only player on our team that truly grades that high is Eli.

As much as Suh would postively impact our D, that’s a pipedream at best.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 9, 2010 6:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

why do we have to trade for the #1 pick?

I don’t get it? Is it the NY thing? Maybe you aren’t a Yankees fan, but this is one of the biggest reason that many fellow NYY fans get on my nerves. Why do we have to go for the absolute best possibly option, selling both balls in the process?

Osi IS worth a first round pick. Looking at Adams and Shockey trade

Why not….Osi + #15 + 3rd rounder (maybe the 2nd roudner is more realistic), for the #3 overall? Tampa could use a pass rush. They probably don’t wanna pay #3 overall money, tho I bet they got some cash set aside. Osi’s making less then the #3 overall pick will

Whether the Rams select Clausen or Suh…the Giants should have their choice if McCoy, Berry or of course McClain (I’d go in that order too).

Possibly even Seattle’s #6 overall? Eric Berry or possibly McCoy could fall to #6. This would probably be more ‘realistic’ to accept a reasonable deal from the Giants, Osi #15 and 3rd rounder.

I dunno if I like any of these…Osi could be more valuable to the team then any of the top 5 players in this draft. And of course, I dunno if the other top teams value Osi enough to make this.

….

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 7:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Because folks get enamored with scouting reports

None of the guys in the draft have done anything, and most likely at least 1/2 the first round guys will be no more than serviceable starters.

I still remember the hubbub about Carl Banks (who was very good), but didn’t come close to the consistent Pro Bowl level people expected.

by giantblue63 on Feb 10, 2010 11:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My Osi trade from a few weeks back

I thought of trading Osi and a 3rd rounder for Oakland’s 8th pick. With Richard Seymour unsigned and soon-to-be 31 y/o, the Raiders could use a DE. In this trade, they get a younger player by 2 years, a player who is still signed, and a decent pick in the process.

The Giants would then pick McClain at #8 and Earl Thomas at #15. Better yet, they’d still have their 2nd round pick to get a solid DT.

by GhostDini on Feb 9, 2010 8:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'd do that in a second.

To be honest….I don’t even care if McClain’s not even there!!!

I just don’t think they’d be giving that up. Its the Raiders tho…so anything’s possible.

….Dunno if I wish banishment to Oakland on Osi tho, he’s still my boy.

Rectum? Damn near killed em!

by FreeBradshaw on Feb 9, 2010 9:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't do it

Osi is a proven comodity. There are too many DE drafted in the 1st round who are busts. If you draft a player and he puts up osi’s numbers you would be happy. Some folks point to the game where osi put up 6 sacks and want to subtract them from his yearly total like that wasn’t an important game and the sacks don’t count. If he had 3 instead in that game and 3 in another game would we then discount those 2 games and say he had 7 in 14 games? 13 sack for the season is 13 sacks. We can’t start looking at games to see if sacks were bunched or if they happened when we were well aheard, behind or just the right time. The guy put up the sacks in an important division game against rivals and so its not fair to take them away to make an arguement. Even his recent rambling can be excused as he just wants to play and the interview had more to it than what the media focused on. He spoke about being embarrassed by his play. He recognize he needs to play better. Coming of the knee surgery, and being 28, i wouldn’t be so quick to trade this true giant who we won a sb with…

by blueforever on Feb 10, 2010 12:37 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

+1

Sacks are not easy to come by! He had 6 sacks against a Professional NFL Offensive tackle, its not like he was going against some random guy from the street.

15 is a good number

by I_Formation27 on Feb 10, 2010 10:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the same tackle

that Tuck couldn’t even get 1 sack in 2 games against this year

by mclaren_is_the_best on Feb 10, 2010 1:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

C'mon, that's not fair

Justice was starting his first NFL game at that point and had basically never played. Now he has three years of experience. Huge difference.

by Ed Valentine on Feb 10, 2010 4:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

true it was his first year but..

professional tackles who make it in the league don’t typically give up 5+ sacks in their first games. Sure his nerves contributed but Osi deserves most of the credit. He is a good young player who got beat by a great player. If I remember well, that was an important game to the giants, a sunday or monday night game, and Osi came up big. We shouldn’t take away his performance that night to discredit him as a player. As far as I am concerned he had 13 sacks that year and contributed to the giants success as much as anyone. I guess it is okay to argue that he had a bad year this year, but we shouldn’t damage his body of work by discounting a dominating performance in an important game just to decrease his number to make an arguement.

Osi definately didn’t play the way we all hoped he would but the guy is one year removed from knee surgery and played partime. If the giants were winning (and no one can put all of the loses on Osi), and he wasn’t being pulled for plays, he might have gotten 3-4 more sacks to end with another double digit year. We would have been happy with that. The fact is under Sheridan no one on the D really played well, Tuck included but everyone is fine giving him a pass because of his injury but not for Osi’s injury (the knee)? For me, Osi is an original drafted giant, who grew up as player with the giants, became a pro bowler and contributed to a improbably SB season. He is a true giant and I am not willing to trade him away at all, for any pick!!! Not this year, not after one bad year after knee surgey, where everyone on D played badly under an inexperienced D cordinator.

by blueforever on Feb 11, 2010 11:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Asu-dance-team-10_small
Crohn's Disease
Small
Would Ladanian Tomlinson be a good fit for the Giants?
Small
OK, This is it! McClain or Weatherspoon?
Sfavatar_small
Rolando McClain Pro Day workout cut short. Reveals he has Crohn's
New_002_small
Maybe McClain will fall
Small
Our biggest offensive line need is...
Small
The Antrel Rolle Signing and Other Thoughts
Phil-simms_small
Hakeem Nicks in Retrospect
Giant-anteater-4059_small
Let's do this
New_002_small
Sorgi to back up Manning again

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Gang Green Nation
Darrent Williams' Killer Brought to Justice
Mile High Report
Broncos Agree to Terms with Defensive Lineman Le Kevin Smith
Mile High Report
Willie Clark found GUILTY in murder of Broncos CB Darrent Williams

SPONSORS

Get Your Giants' Gear


Editor-In-Chief

Bigblueview_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Blueshirt_banter_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Small brisulph

Authors

Tyree_believe_small cjmulrain