Daily NFL Draft Prospect Profile: Brandon Spikes, MLB, Florida
If there is a linebacker in the 2010 NFL Draft who sounds a lot like a younger version of Antonio Pierce, it would have to be Florida's Brandon Spikes.
So, let's talk about Spikes as we continue our series of prospect profiles of players who might interest the New York Giants in the 2010 NFL Draft.
At one time, Spikes was considered a lock to be an early- to mid- first-round selection. He is widely considered the second-best middle linebacker propsect in the draft behind Alabama's Rolando McClain. Yet, the big question with Spikes is value -- how early is too early to grab him.
SB Nation's Mocking The Draft summarizes the dilemma that is Spikes this way.
Following a solid, but slightly unspectacular, senior year Spikes could go in the first 25 picks.
The catch there is that there is a trend of middle linebackers sliding in the draft. It's hard to say that Spikes is a better player than James Laurinaitis or Rey Maualuga, and they were both selected in the second round.
Let's take a closer look at what various scouting reports say about Spikes.
Brandon Spikes Scouting Reports
In its latest Mock Draft, The Football Expert analyzes the Giants and knows they need linebacker help. But, this is what they about Spikes and the Giants first-round selection, 15th overall. "Realistically it is too soon for Florida’s Spikes because scouts will fall asleep waiting for him to finish his 40."
That seems to be the major question about Spikes. Is he fast enough to be a dominant sideline-to-sideline middle linebacker, and to hold up in pass coverage? What type of speed he shows in the upcoming Scouting Combine will undoubtedly affect how early Spikes comes off the board.
Here is some of what SB Nation's Mocking The Draft said about Spikes.
The read and react skills for Spikes are stellar. He processes a play quickly and has the football intelligence to know where the play is going to develop. This helps him overcome a small lack of athleticism and agility. Does a really nice job of managing a defense and will be able to do so in the NFL.
What keeps Spikes from being an elite linebacker prospect is a lack of athleticism. He doesn't have those quick-twitch movements you like to see in premier players.
He's a heady middle linebacker who can lead a defense and be a coach on the field. He's a student of the game and it shows in his excellent recognition skills.
Spikes is a versatile linebacker who could handle playing in a 4-3 or a 3-4. His strength and intelligence should make him an immediate starter at the next level.
Here is a little bit of what ESPN says in its analysis of Spikes.
One of the most instinctive defenders in college football today. Recognition skills continue to improve. Finds the ball quickly and has playmaking flair. ...
Plays the game with a chip on his shoulder and shows the ferocious attitude teams are looking for in an ILB/MLB. ...
Top-end speed is not great but it is adequate for his position. He's quicker than fast and generally covers more ground than his 40-time indicates. ...
Displays better closing burst to the ball carrier than his timed speed might indicate.
Why Spikes fits with the Giants
The Giants defense could use an attitude adjustment, a little nastiness if you will. There is no better position to get that from than the middle linebacker, the guy who is in the middle of everything. You also have to like what you read about Spikes' intelligence and instincts. In his best seasons, Pierce was never the fastest middle linebacker. But, if you have the instincts to know where the ball is going to be, and the aggression to fight your way to it, that goes a long way. The other aspect of replacing Pierce that is often mentioned is his ability quarterback a defense. It seems Spikes has potential to be that type of leader.
Why the Giants should pass
Speed kills. This one depends on just exactly how much Tampa 2 new defensive coordinator Perry Fewell is intending to play. Spikes is reportedly better in zone coverage than man-to-man. If, however, Fewell is going to be asking the middle linebacker to consistently make that deep drop the Tampa 2 requires then Spikes might not be the right guy for the job. Otherwise, he seems like an excellent fit for the Giants if he happens to be available in Round 2.
(E-mail Ed at bigblueview@gmail.com)
0 recs |
48 comments
|
Comments
If he's the best D player when we draft,
I say grab him. I doubt if he will be. He really doesn’t fit the bill for the Giants. We ned speed at LB.
If not him, then who else?
We need someone to fill Pierce’s shoes. He is a monster, 6’3 255+ and his intensity would make an impact. Maybe his 40 time will scare some teams off.
OI812
spikes is a great player
rolando mcclain will most likely not be there, and i agree that 15 may be too early to grab spikes. i dont see him slipping to the 15th pick of the 2nd round, so it is unlikely that the giants will pick him. im hoping that mcclain somehow slips or we trade up for him.
by GiantsReignSupreme on Feb 6, 2010 12:14 PM EST reply actions
system
there are system QB’s & MLB’s…I think Rolando, although a good player,was protected by the system that saban had in place….yes, I would take him if he was there at 15..but I have this gut feeling he may not become what most people in the know would like hime to be…
Regroup refocus..retool...
if you're talking about system players
we shouldn’t take anyone from UF. Since UM has been there they’ve had elite level D every year and 0 successful NFL prospects to show for it.
some things can't be timed
I’m all for speed from the MLB position…but being quick to the ball as well as knowing where the play is going can in many ways negate top end speed…Players that are not as 40 friendly need to be smart and certain when they play..this kid sounds like that kind of heads up player that can be an asset to the Giants..For all the hoopla about MLB speed how many really have elite speed ? all the speen in the world doesn’t help if you’re running bye the play or in the wrong direction…I say if no one we want is there trade down to get him around 23…
Regroup refocus..retool...
I agree wholeheartedly and seems like what we'd do....sure thing in the first round?
This is curious to me at 15 you want a sure thing right? The consensus around Spikes even moreso than McClain is that he will be a very good starter for years to come, but that McClain is less of a safe bet with bigger upside (reminds me of a certain guy out of Penn State who finished his career with us named Arrington). Spkes is a player we don’t need the combine to tell us that.
I wouldn’t be in the least concerned if we take a sure thing at 15 in Spikes However the Giants are a conservative and sound bunch, but they are savvy too, so grabbing somebody that another team wants at 15 and then having them have that team grab Spikes and pu a pick does sound very much like them.
Once again,if he's the best available, fine,
but as dismal as our LBs look, we need a DT and an S first. If Spikes is better than a S or DT available 15, they should take him. As you point out, speed isn’t the ultimate consideration (as AP proved) but our LB speed is pitiful.
Realistically
He is the best shot at MLB that we have if the Giants do an orthodox draft, without trading up for Rolando McClain.
In my ideal draft we use our 15th pick in the first round and then trade up in the second round to pick Spikes.
Yeah, we like NFL here in Brazil.
+1
that would be ideal.
Maybe an OT at 15?
by Ahmad Bradshaw on Feb 6, 2010 1:44 PM EST up reply actions
i agree that would be ideal
trading down and still being able to get brandon spikes and stocking up on picks later in the draft would be a great idea.
by GiantsReignSupreme on Feb 6, 2010 8:27 PM EST up reply actions
I think
If we can trade back, aquire more picks, and get spikes, then it’s win win for the giants. I think it is a little bit of a reach at 15, but I wouldn’t be disappointed if we did. I would rather get more value for our picks
by bigblueguru on Feb 6, 2010 1:23 PM EST via mobile reply actions
If this doesn't sound like a young AP, nothing does:
“The read and react skills for Spikes are stellar. He processes a play quickly and has the football intelligence to know where the play is going to develop. This helps him overcome a small lack of athleticism and agility. Does a really nice job of managing a defense and will be able to do so in the NFL.”
Sounds just like a young AP.
Granted, I want a better MLB than even what a younger AP was…
Spikes is a solid 2nd or 3rd round option, IMO. Not touching him at 15.
Wouldn't be mad if they got Spikes on the team
I don’t think they have to get him at 15, which means they could trade down for him. He does have a lot of AP in him…tho about 3 inches taller and about 20 lbs on AP.
I like other MLB’s better, Pat Angerer for instance. But if they could get Spikes…I’d be OK with it (not at 15…its unnecessary IMO)
Sintim Spikes Boley with Kehl and Goff mixed in, could be good! It could also stink!
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
Couldn't agree more with the sum up ...
“could be good, it could also stink”. Can’t remember when I felt so unsure of all 3 units on our D. Could almost say the same for the D-Line and Secondary. Last year really cast some doubt on this D.
Angerer
is a guy who is looked at as a mid-round selection. I’d have no problem with the guy, but not as early as you would take Spikes.
Frankly, I think Spikes should be a mid-round guy...
…as I wouldn’t really touch him in the first two rounds.
I want to see his combine times
They aren’t the whole story, but they need an MLB and if he times slow, probably won’t cut it especially in Tampa D.
But they could do a lot worse than drafting Spikes, he is no slacker and will give you what he’s got.
Probably Washington..
but I like Sean Weatherspoon and Navorro Bowman better. Both played every LB spot on their team, defensive leaders (Weatherspoon doesn’t shut up…in a good way)..and of course, very fast.
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
And Angerer too...
Angerer’s less boom or bust then Spikes, probably not the same upside, but I think Angerer at worst will be a solid MLB
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
I see them as about even
Washington is faster and played well surrounded by less talent (though TCUs D was good)
Spikes is bigger and stronger, but never emerged into the kind of playmaker you would like to have seen. Watched him in FLA’s bowl game, didn’t really impress me.
I'd be happy with Spikes
But much happier if we traded down in the first, maybe twice like the Browns did. And say we get him with a late first rounder. I’m interested in Lee, Witherspoon, Angerer, Bowman, and Washington. Don’t see Rolando falling to us, and I highly doubt we trade up. If we could one of the above LBs and say a Big Dan or Price, I think the majority of BBV readers would be pretty happy.
by wangstu13 on Feb 6, 2010 3:49 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Spikes All the Way
If you’re trying to rebuild, nothing works better for a defense than a middle linebacker
Get Spikes!
Just like Reese should have traded up in the 1st round in 2007 to obtain Revis rather than Ross at CB (was vilified for making that claim then), then Reese should try to be proactive in the 2010 draft. MLB is the #1 area which needs strengthening on the Jints.
Move up (whatever reasonable move it takes) to obtain Spikes at about the 10th pick (if still available).
The Giants need to trade up to obtain a player whom they have strong conviction (on).
That would be excessive
There’s no reason to move for anyone except McClain. If McClain, Thomas, Price, and Williams are gone, then trade down. However, moving up for Spikes would be a very bad move.
i think we should sign a FA MLB
n also use a 2nd pick on another LB like Washington or witherspoon
Must have Speed
We should not consider anyone in this draft on either side of the ball who is not built for speed. Especially not for a defensive pick in a cover 2. Our defense has a shocking lack of ability to react quickly and swarm like they used to. I’ll take a pass on this guy.
and his LB's.....
maybe he can choose LB’s for the Giants (Morrison and Howard are good)
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 6, 2010 11:26 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry Men
but I just can’t get that lovin’ feelin’ for Spikes. He was a senior on a great team but he never really stood out as a great player. I watched several Florida games and never really felt like Spikes was an irreplaceable part in their machine. There are a lot of writers on this blog with far superior knowledge of the available college talent, and I bow to that superiority, but with that bow I mumble beneath my breath……
It's funny how college play is no guarantee of NFL greatness.
Take a guy like A J Hawk. He looked like the next coming of Jack Lambert but has yet to be spectacular with the Packers. I’ve often wondered if it’s because college teams don’t adjust to compensate for an outstanding guy as well as the pro teams do.
Maybe we should have a discussion about whether great athlete is preferable to a cerebral one. Peyton is an example of the cerebral, while a guy like LT did it mainly with athleticism.
by giant fan since 57 on Feb 7, 2010 5:37 AM EST reply actions
Hawk's a good middle linebacker
My main problem was he was about four inches shorter and about 10-20 pounds lighter than you’d want a MLB to be. I didn’t think it was a particularly good pick for the Packers, but since then he has proven to be adequate.
Spikes is as good as it gets for the Giants in the first round. He has size, speed and a ton of meanness. And with all things personnel, he may well wind up being stiff, so its a gamble to be sure.
But Spikes is as good as the Giants are gonna get in the first round at linebacker, where they really need the help.
good point.
Its all about fit. What sort of defense is Fewell running?
With Spags, and I guess Sheridan, the GIants were trying to copy the Eagles sort of D. The Eagles Stewart Bradley is an excellent MLB and he’s a lot like Spikes being 6"2 255lbs. Smart, instinctive, can be good in zone coverage (not so much man)
With Fewell…is Spikes even a possibility?
The Bills had Paul Posluszny as thier MLB, and whenever he’s healthy, he’s pretty much an ideal MLB for Fewell. Poz is 6"1 235lbs (**ahem…about Pat Angerer size).
Spikes being as big as he is and not exactly a ‘fluid’ athlete…does he fit? I don’t think so.
I know Fewell’s on record as saying he’ll just go with what’s given to him…but if he’s gonna primarily go with Tampa 2…Brandon Spikes, at any point in the draft, is a horrible choice.
Only way a MLB as big as Spikes can fit a Tampa 2 is if he’s Brian Urlacher. Spikes ain’t no Urlacher.
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
Or about Washington's size
The Bills had Paul Posluszny as thier MLB, and whenever he’s healthy, he’s pretty much an ideal MLB for Fewell. Poz is 6"1 235lbs (**ahem…about Pat Angerer size).
agree
tho I think we talked about this before, Washington’s usually listed below 230lbs (he can bulk up of course).
Another thing, Washington played MLB, but kinda like Sean Weatherspoon, it was a lot of doing that in a 4-2-5 system.
Angerer played MLB in a 4-3 system.
I don’t think it really makes a difference among these guys. Washington and Weatherspoon might be more athletic, but Angerer’s pretty close to them. Angerer also just makes plays.
Can also get Angerer in the 3rd or 4th. Washington’s probably off the board by the third (to the Colts) and Weatherspoon’s probably gone before the Giants 2nd rounder.
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
"Plays the game with a chip on his shoulder and shows the ferocious attitude teams are looking for in an ILB/MLB"
that right there is why the giants should really think hard about taking him early. This defense need a attitude and nastyness upgrade bad
Is it baseball season yet??
by Plaxico Burress on Feb 8, 2010 10:34 AM EST reply actions
MLB's are big and Fast and Smart
if you’re gonna waste a No1 or 2 pick on this position(which we should) the guy should at least meet all of these criteria. If he doesn’t than don’t consider him…

by 



















