Big Blue View: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

Union leader sees lockout ahead

This is news football fans definitely do not want to hear, even if their might be a little posturing involved.

The question to DeMaurice Smith was simple, coming from Cincinnati receiver Chad Ochocinco, asking how serious he viewed the possibility of football not being played in 2011.

Smith did not hesitate.

"On a scale of 1 to 10," Smith said Thursday, "it's a 14."

With that, the executive director of the NFL Players Association painted perhaps the bleakest picture yet regarding prospects of labor strife in the league, which could be looking at a 2010 season with no salary cap and, if the collective bargaining agreement expires as scheduled in March 2011, a lockout that year.

"I keep coming back to an economic model in America that is unparalleled," said Smith, who often repeated phrases for emphasis. "And that makes it incredibly difficult to then come to players and say, on average, each of you needs to take a $340,000 pay cut to save the National Football League. Tough sell. Tough sell."

Smith said the NFL would receive $5 billion from its network television deals even if no games are played in 2011. He regarded that as proof owners are preparing for a lockout.

By the way, that is pretty good journalism from Ochocinco.

0 recs  |  Comment 19 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

NFL Owners and Players better wake up.

I watched the NHL do the same foolishness, they took off for a year, the NHL has never been the same since, and the players are stil getting inflated contracts just like they were before the lockout oh and the owners are still complaining.

NFL better realize that if they go on strike people will realize their is more to life than football and find other things to do with there time.

by Late for Dinner on Feb 5, 2010 10:30 AM EST reply actions  

It could get worse

The MLB CBA is up in 2011
The NBA CBA is up in 2011
The NHL CBA is up in 2011
I highly doubt lockouts but you never know

You can see a lot just by observing-Yogi Berra

by greg a on Feb 5, 2010 10:39 AM EST reply actions  

Lockout probably couldn't come at a worse time for the NFL

Business-wise, the NFL is finally making really tremendous strides internationally. A lockout now would seriously slow down the momentum they’ve got going in Europe … so while the NFLPA might want a lockout, they also have a strong negotiating position if the owners get just a tad bit (more) greedy.

It’s going to be interesting to see how this plays out.

by LordKaT on Feb 5, 2010 10:43 AM EST reply actions  

When the union chief is being interviewed by a player

I don’t really take it very seriously.

It is a 1 year process, and it has officially started with this nonsense. That puts them in great position to have deal next February. This is a PR game, the union is trying to turn up the heat on the owners via public opinion. Its a familiar old dance now.

by giantblue63 on Feb 5, 2010 10:47 AM EST reply actions  

He's not a player

He’s a reporter for OCNN, haven’t you heard?? Good journalism indeed. Ha Ha

This would really suck though. I hope it doesn’t come to a lockout.

15 is a good number

by I_Formation27 on Feb 5, 2010 12:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I've said it before and I'll say it again...

In terms of fan-friendliness, Goodell is the worst commissioner of all time.

by JimmyK on Feb 5, 2010 10:48 AM EST reply actions  

I watched the NHL lockout play out

and both sides were convinced the other would blink. Only after the owners showed they would let seasons go by did the players realize that they did not have the resources to fight the owners, and folded. I have to say I see the same thing occurring here, despite the owners greed being ridiculous in all of this.

by brisulph on Feb 5, 2010 11:21 AM EST reply actions  

Just thought of something...

the UFL must be drooling right now, praying that an agreement is not made. They could make a real strong power play if there is a lockout. What are CBS and FOX going to show on Sundays with no NFL? If I were a UFL exec, phone calls would already be made to make sure that their games get played instead of some dumb movie.

by CCE718 on Feb 5, 2010 11:36 AM EST reply actions  

very true....

I never thought about that, but you are right, this is perfect timing for the UFL, maybe Palmer saw it coming! haha

by NJDuke on Feb 5, 2010 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

The NFL is a Facsist organization..

… not that there’s anything wrong with it. The NFL wants to control every aspect of the sport. They want input in everything from the broadcasters on TV to the players twitter feeds. They want to put a muzzle on loud players like TO and Ochocinco. They levy fines for uniform infractions and excessive celebrations.and I like it.
I mean the alternative is much worse. If the NFL was not so rigid on their policies and let players run the league like in Baseball, the sport would become unwatchable. There would be more players switching teams every year and nothing but negative news and over glorification of individual talents (not that there’s not enough of it now) on the air. Football is a sport that requires a totalitarian approach. Kinda like the Army. Here is your paycheck and this is what you are expected to do in return. All the organizations that follow this approach succeed. (Steelers, Giants, Patriots)
If a lockout is going to put the players in their place and preserve the integrity of a team sport, then Im fine with it. Call me old school, but i kinda liked when Parcells referred to a player by his number instead of his name.

LarryHarryCarlPepper

by gr8kicks on Feb 5, 2010 1:57 PM EST reply actions  

this WILL happen

the owners are all planning on it as a necessary evil. The players wont back down as far as they owners want the to. Hopefully its just a couple games before the fans start showing up in the lots on what would have been game day and setting fire to the cities.

by ryanwk628 on Feb 5, 2010 2:05 PM EST reply actions  

If it happens...

We have only the greedy NFL owners the blame. There was already a deal in place set to go through 2012 and the owners, not the players, opted out of it and asked the players to take a pay cut while the NFL continues to generate record revenues and the highest TV ratings in decades.

The owners will repeatedly cite the bad economy as their reason, but keep in mind that the players’ salaries were automatically tied to a percentage of league revenue. So if revenue ever went down for the owners, then the salary cap would automatically go down in the exact same proportion for the players. When you consider the violence of the game, the brevity of players’ careers, and the fact that contracts are not guaranteed in the NFL, it becomes very difficult for me to see how anyone could side with the billionaire owners on this one. It’s a cash grab, plain and simple.

I know I sound like a shill for the players, but I promise I have no dog in this fight. After analyzing the issue though, it’s clear that the owners are the aggressors here.

by BigBlue84 on Feb 5, 2010 3:45 PM EST reply actions  

Nice points

I only know a little about the situation but you provided some good insights. To me this stinks of Jerry Jones.

by Landeta on Feb 5, 2010 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Selfish quesion about the lockout

What do you do if you are a season ticket holder in 2011? I don’t want to drop 2G’s in May for tix for a season that might not happen. I’m sure the GIants front office would repay me but what a pain in the ass

by Landeta on Feb 5, 2010 4:02 PM EST reply actions  

Wouldn't be surprised if it happened.

The owners CHOSE to opt out of the current deal, making 2010 uncapped. They didn’t have to – if I remember right, they could have continued with the agreement until 2012 (not sure though).
They’re getting a billion a year from DirecTV whether games are played or not. That oughta make up for the thousands of seats that the Giants can’t sell. It should also be a nice windfall for the other teams in smaller markets or markets where they can’t sell their seats.
Because of the owners choosing to opt out, and because of the money they will be making regardless, this is a very real possibility.
If the players choose to be too stubborn we may be in for a long journey through “replacement hell”. I sure hope not though. It would have a serious impact on my view of the NFL and whether or not I’d ever purchase a ticket again. With the growth they’ve seen recently it would be stupid to throw a wrench into it, but money talks. I just hope the fans don’t walk.

We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.

by GAgiantfan on Feb 5, 2010 4:27 PM EST reply actions  

You got it

it’s all about money. A bunch of greedy pigs on both sides. I do believe that the NFL is at the height of it’s popularity and because of the current CBA issue it will never be as popular as it is today. Sure it will still be a big deal once it comes back in 2012 and still the most popular sport but not as much of a machine as it is today.

by Landeta on Feb 5, 2010 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

It's amazing that ...

the NFL was able to negotiate a deal with the networks to still get $5 billion to not play football (sounds like one of those congressional farm subsidies to not grow tobacco).

That is why the owners feel they are in such a strong bargaining position with the players union in the Not-For-Long league. I wouldn’t be surprised if the networks skew their coverage of this thing to be very anti-ownership.

Also makes you wonder how the GM’s will be playing this. Don’t expect to see a lot of guaranteed up front money in FA deals this off-season, as that amounts to the owners paying the players to not play. It also could make more sense to trade down in this draft, and stockpile younger players you don’t expect to contribute in 2010, but should be very ready by 2012, and go with some end-of-their-career FA types for 1-year deals to plug some holes in 2010.

by Shofner85 on Feb 6, 2010 7:06 AM EST reply actions  

I support

The players. These are dude getting concussions and having reduced quality of life at 45 years of age and who we tune it to watch. I read somewhere the owners want give backs to cover the cost of stadium building? Are they for real the players never pushed for that the onwers wanted the luxury box revenue for extorting the tax payers in many places. The owners, esp. the cheap ones who have crushed the American work in their day jobs for the last 25-30 years are hoping these same workers hate the players for what they make and the few that get into trouble off the field and side with them to screw them over.

by DoctorK16 on Feb 6, 2010 1:21 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

SPONSORS

Get Your Giants' Gear

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Baltimore Ravens: It's Joe Flacco's Turn

New York Jets wide receiver Darrelle Revis signals to the fans during football practice at the new Meadowlands Stadium, Wednesday, June 16, 2010 in East Rutherford, N.J. (AP Photo/Bill Kostroun) +22 updates

When You're A Jet: Darrelle Revis Agrees To Terms With New York On Extension

Baltimore Ravens wide receiver Mark Clayton (89) makes a catch in front of defender Cary Williams (29) during the NFL football team's training camp, Monday, Aug. 2, 2010, in Westminster, Md. (AP Photo/Rob Carr)

Ravens Trade WR Mark Clayton To Rams

More from SBNation.com >


Editor-In-Chief

Ed_valentine_2_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Blueshirt_banter_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Small brisulph

Authors

Tyree_believe_small cjmulrain