Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks 90, Raptors 87: "Shump and Lin wouldn't let us lose."

New York Giants notes: Alford, Westbrook, other stuff

A few notes relating to our New York Giants for you on a Friday morning.

  • First, I hope you either listened in or have had a chance to hear the podcast of Thursday night's 'New York Giants Talk' I co-hosted with Patricia Traina of Inside Football. If you haven't, you can listen to the podcast at Blog Talk Radio
  • Nice story the other day by Michael Eisen of Giants.com about re-habbing defensive tackle Jay Alford. The Giants really missed Alford in 2009, and he missed them.

    "When football is your life, basically, and when it gets taken away, you have no life," Alford said recently in the locker room at the Timex Performance Center, where he continues to work out regularly. "I missed everything about football - the locker room atmosphere, getting close to your teammates, practicing, games - all of it. When it's not there anymore, it's stinks.

    "I haven't been so bored in my life than I was last season. I'm definitely looking forward to this year, because you just miss it, you miss it a lot. I'm definitely looking forward to getting back on the field."
  • Former Philadelphia star Brian Westbrook would look strange in a Giants uniform. He is, however, open to the possibility.

    "At this point I am not sure where I will be at," Westbrook said on 97.5 in Philadelphia. "But I would be willing to go to any team that would have me, any team in search of a championship."

Star-divide

Comment 39 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Westbrook

I would welcome him with open arms, have always respected this guy. The best thing of it would be to get inside his head and see what it is the Eagles have on us… Also wouldn’t be a bad thing to see Westbrook scoring TDs against his old team while he is wearing a big blue helemet! I’m for it as always on the cheap(because of his age).

All's Well that Fewell

by gobs56 on Feb 26, 2010 8:15 AM EST reply actions  

I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.

by JimmyK on Feb 26, 2010 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Just the response

I will enjoy lol

All's Well that Fewell

by gobs56 on Feb 26, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha, I think Antonio Pierce sees the back of Westbrook’s jersey in his sleep. I’m going to miss that matchup dearly.

by JimmyK on Feb 26, 2010 10:29 AM EST up reply actions  

maybe you guys can sign AP

and we can sign Westbrook.

2009 Did Not Happen

by cjmulrain on Feb 26, 2010 10:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Good call

I would hate to see pierce in the eagles uni but i could deal with it if he is still chasing down BW from behind lol!

All's Well that Fewell

by gobs56 on Feb 26, 2010 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

That would be a bizzare turn of events!!..LOL!

"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"

by Bobbiblue on Feb 26, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

OVERRATED!

CLAP! CLAP! CLAPCLAPCLAP!

by wilddre22 on Feb 26, 2010 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Your show

I listened to you and Patti Traina with great interest and wish the show had been longer.
I think my fellow bloggers would be interested in her comment that the Giants don’t draw up their draft board until right before the draft; I had been under the impression that many teams did it (or at least roughed it out) before the combine.
One question. You kept saying that she was “closer to the team” than you are. What is her relationship with the Giants?

Mickey C

by Mickey C on Feb 26, 2010 8:30 AM EST reply actions  

Pat

is a ‘fully credentialed’ member of the media. She has practice, game and locker room access. I don’t. Thus, she has a personal relationship with a lot of these guys and their agents. That’s what I meant by that.

by Ed Valentine on Feb 26, 2010 9:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Draft

I am guessing here, but I think what she means by that is this. I’m sure they have a rough idea right now, but they won’t etch it in stone until FA and all the private workouts are done.

by Ed Valentine on Feb 26, 2010 9:20 AM EST up reply actions  

Draft

Thanks. I was just thinking back to the post of a couple of days ago discussing the combine, when we talked in terms of the draft boards being 90% complete at this point. Waiting until April makes more sense – you have Combine results (it may not be overwhelmingly important, but it is information), pro day and private workout results, free agency results, and the latest medical reports on your own players.

Mickey C

by Mickey C on Feb 26, 2010 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually, there are several personnel people(scouts, etc.) with their own boards

they develop based on their own views and assigned players to cover. There is aometimes years of gathered info involved. The front office doesn’t get involved until after 4 things are accomplished. #1 Current Roster Free Agents’ dispositions are settled and the ones we’re keeping get signed. #2 The combine is completed. #3 Free Agency has been thoroughly reviewed and all transactions are completed. #4 The scouts meet with the Player Personnel Director and all of the individual boards are pared down and all the research is consolidiated into a coherent and cohesive manner. At this time the scouts can deliver their arguments to support their findings and streamline that to be efficient for JR and the Coaches to go through. All the film is collected and merged to form a comprehensive report.

What I’ve heard is that there is little to no conversation about future players, but there are requests by coaches and JR for info on certain players of interest during both the season and post season. Some of the players have been followed since high school. I’ve been told that thescouting staff is HUGE.

Now, I know of some DVD’s that have been seen on certain people’s desks, but I can’t get any answers as to what players are on them as their not labeled with names. I’ve gotten some “kinda maybes”, but that’s all.

Thay don’t put together a final board until the very last minute, after they’ve got an idea of what is going on with every aspect, including what they can glean from other teams’ staffs.

Bleeding Blue since 1962

by sunlion333 on Feb 26, 2010 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Massive money on Karlos Dansby could be a good thing

If they get Dansby and Denver trades away Marshall, that makes us the frontrunners for Rolando McClain, doesn’t it?
Of course, I’m not entirely convinced he’s a good fit for a 4-3… He seems to sort of lumber around. He’s almost TOO big…

by Charles L on Feb 26, 2010 8:35 AM EST reply actions  

Alford may break it out

this season and we’ll all be wondering why there was any worry about DT. Not excited about Westbrook’s availability, a luxury item for the defensive needy G-men.
Regarding teams relying on the combine, I think some of that ‘reliance’ is also a cover-my-rear maneuver…….“Well Boss, how was I to know the SOB couldn’t play football??? He had a vertical of 27 foot and run a 3.2 at the COMBINE!! Maybe we could train ’im to know WHEN to run and WHEN to jump?!?!?…….”

by Jolly on Feb 26, 2010 9:05 AM EST reply actions  

not worth a roster spot

he will get hurt,just like our other RB’s….this isn’t ’06 anymore

by Shaunthegiant on Feb 26, 2010 9:45 AM EST reply actions  

Brackett?

Indy isn’t going to tag him… Rutgers boy, fast, a little small, big tackler…??

by TNYFBG on Feb 26, 2010 9:47 AM EST reply actions  

Colts will sign Brackett

to franchise $$$ without the tag. He will unfortunately not be available.

DT in the draft is a given but “where” is the question. If you think rounds 1-3 then you are assuming that only two of the Giants 3 DTs will play well in 2010. OR that a team needs four DTs to win. I am not sure on either.

I am optimistic that Canty, Alford and Cofield will all play well and that a DT is needed in the draft but not in rounds 1-3. Best available comes in to play of course but I would look at LB and at safety first – maybe even OT.

by MSP Giant on Feb 26, 2010 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Westbrook...

…would be a nice addition in many ways. RBs get hurt. These guys take a beating. I believe we had 4 running in ‘07. Most forget about Droughns. That dude had some pop at the line and the only rb to play all 16 games. He also led the team with 6 rushing tds. I’m not saying BW is as tough as Droughns but he could be usefull. Guy has a good attitude. Rather him than LT but I wouldn’t be opposed to signing him either, though I doubt he is willing to take on this type of roll for a minimum payday.

by Last year in Sec 127 on Feb 26, 2010 10:21 AM EST reply actions  

Of the three we talked about the other day..

I would go after Westbrook..LDT is burned out and Peppers is a head case..who only plays when he feels like it..Westbrook on the otherhand may have some fuel left in his tank..and it would be enjoyable watching him in our uniform beating the Eagles..but I must say I did vote against all three of them..Even though they are starting talks concerning a new CBA..2011 is still in doubt..So who wants to bring in older players this year?

"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"

by Bobbiblue on Feb 26, 2010 10:32 AM EST reply actions  

+1

But if he don’t he can lose more brain cells on our team!

All's Well that Fewell

by gobs56 on Feb 26, 2010 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Yes he had two? I think concussions last year that they didn't do a very good

Job of bringing him back from..One more year in Philly and you’d hear the crowd chanting: “Run Forrest Run !!!”..

"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"

by Bobbiblue on Feb 26, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions  

how come the ny giants dont spend money like the knicks or yankees?

it is because they are prudent or that they really dont have that type of money? arent ny teams known for big bank rolls?

by karamjitm9090 on Feb 26, 2010 11:08 AM EST reply actions  

Because

there traditionally has been a salary cap. NFL teams can’t. Besides, the Redskins have proven that philosophy does not work in the NFL. Oh, and it doesn’t work for the Knicks either. Spend all the money you want, but when you don’t have a clue the cash doesn’t help.

by Ed Valentine on Feb 26, 2010 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't mind a team spending money

as long as they spend it wisely. The Lakers & Celtics spend money, but they spend it wisely. The Red Sox and Yankees spend money, but they spend it wisely. There’s nothing wrong with going out and spending a lot of money on a free agent or two (especially in this uncapped year), but they shouldn’t be spending money for spending’s sake, the way the Redskins always do.

2009 Did Not Happen

by cjmulrain on Feb 26, 2010 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

The Giants have never been don't to have 'deep pockets'

In fact their two front pockets haves holes in them and they generally forget where they left their wallet..

"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"

by Bobbiblue on Feb 26, 2010 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

..hmmm another idiot phrase on my part..geez..I meant: "never have been known to have 'Deep Pockets'...

"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"

by Bobbiblue on Feb 26, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Now this is not only a true comment..

But absolutely hilarious !!..Redskins and Knicks spending all that money for bombs that don’t detonate..haha..George S. has Alzhiemers and can pick and pay for winners..He doesn’t even know where the stadium is without help getting there yet he still pays for players that win..Plus he makes them get haircuts…

"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"

by Bobbiblue on Feb 26, 2010 2:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I remember that game against the Rams

i thought will joseph was gonna be the ish after seeing that sack. we were all over Kurt Warner that game, he seemed real old in that game. that’s why i wasn’t a fan of signing him after the Rams cut him, since that was the lasting impression of him. he was a decent Giant tho. But not Joseph.

by wilddre22 on Feb 26, 2010 12:00 PM EST reply actions  

Westbrook

He still as the legs in my opinion, at least from what I saw in that playoff game vs Dallas. He just needs to stay healthy

by Nfpdawg on Feb 26, 2010 1:10 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
If No Manningham, Get Randy Moss
Hakeem_nicks_compartment_syndrome_leg_injury_small
State of the Union - The End.
Landeta_small
All Time Giants Super Bowl Team
Arqamaca-p218897_small
Congratulations From a Raiders Fan
Hakeem_nicks_compartment_syndrome_leg_injury_small
The Jerry Reese Game! v2012

Recent FanPosts

I_bring_it_2_small
Official "Things-you-can't-spell-without-Eli" Comedy Thread
Usf_logo_small
The JR Bandwagon!
Small
First moves?
Img_0245_small
Playoffs Fuhgeddabout it...
Snv30403_small
Rest In Peace, Whitney
1bradshaw_small
Jeremy Lin = Victor Cruz

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Get Your Giants' Gear

160x600_ny_giants_medium


Editor-In-Chief

Ed_valentine_2_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Small brisulph

Authors

Mike_farley_small Mike Farley

Meme2_small Sean Kerr