Daily NFL Draft Prospect Profile: C.J. Spiller, RB, Clemson
In our continuing series of NFL Draft prospect profiles, where we look at players who might be of interest to our New York Giants, I guess you could call today's entry my 'Ode to FreeBradshaw.'
That's because we are going to discuss Clemson running back C.J. Spiller. 'Free' and others have often trumpeted Spiller's skills and called for the Giants to grab him if he is available at No. 15. To me, two things work against that.
- The number of needs the Giants have on the defensive side of the ball.
- The waning reliance on the running game in the NFL today. The Giants already have several backs who can get the job done. Why use a No. 1 pick on a back when running the football is a low priority in today's game?
Anyway, let's break down Spiller's abilities.
C.J. Spiller Scouting Reports
Here is SB Nation's Mocking the Draft comparing the 5-foot-11, 195-pound Spiller to a pretty nice name.
Where Spiller lacks in size and strength, he makes up for in speed and athleticism. A dynamic running back who considered entering the 2009 NFL Draft, Spiller is a multi-threat player who can play special teams and catch passes. But he's made his name running around and past defenders. He instinctively eludes contact and gets up to speed quickly.
Size is a concern, but his running style often negates his lack of bulk.Spiller really broke through in his senior season after splitting carries with James Davis his first three years.
Spiller might not necesarily be the next Chris Johnson, but he'll be the closest player to him in the NFL.
Walter Football offers a different comparison. Again, this isn't a bad one, either.
Spiller profiles as a very explosive back, but isn't a No. 1 in the NFL, which isn't an entirely bad thing. ...
Player Comparison: Reggie Bush. Both backs love to kick it outside and have the elite athleticism to make everyone miss in the open field as great home-run threats.
NFL Draft BIble offers this opinion.
Pros: Spiller is an electrifying running back who has the ability to take it the distance on any given play. He is a bona fide home-run threat every time he touches the ball, whether it’s on the ground, through the air or in the return game.
Cons: He doesn’t have great size; weighing around 200 pounds, so the question is can he carry the load 20 to 25 times a game. With the NFL going to a lot of two back systems Spiller fit into that mold perfectly, since he has great hands and can do damage once he gets a hold of the rock.
Why Spiller fits with the Giants
He is a game-breaker, that's why. Most NFL games turn on a handful of big plays, and if Spiller is the biggest play-maker on the board when the Giants select at No. 15 snagging him is worth thinking about, at least. After all, does it matter if those big plays come on offense or defense?
Why the Giants should pass
The Giants, as we know, have a ton of needs on the defensive side of the ball. In reality, maybe none of the running backs the Giants currently have possess Spiller's game-breaking ability. But the Giants already have a crowded, capable backfield -- especially if Andre Brown can return from his Achilles Tendon injury. Would this really be a smart move with all the other needs the Giants have? Probably not.
(E-mail Ed at bigblueview@gmail.com)
116 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Which means...
it probably will happen.
What if McClain and Earl Thomas are off the board? Take Spiller or reach with Weatherspoon?
Get a DT
There will be one of the top 3-5 DTs left on the board then, that would probably be the fall back if a great LB or S option wasn’t there. Or trade back.
Dont get a DT
I dont want a DT that isnt one of the top 2 at 15 and that isnt gonna happen. is it gonna be like William Joseph who was rated the 4th or 5th DT the year we took him and there just isnt room for so many DTs in the 1st round.
by michaelkhan3 on Feb 13, 2010 2:06 PM EST up reply actions
To be effective
He needs to be getting ten to 15 touches a game to get a big play.
So who will see a reduction in playing time Jacobs (assuming he is healthy), Bradshaw (again if healthy) who is similar to Spiller, Brown (on return from injury) or Ware/Johnson the guys likely to be cut for Brown and or Spiller.
I agree with Ed that we have more pressing issues on the team to take Spiller no 1, unless we are cutting Jacobs, Ware, Johnson and going with Bradshaw, Spiller and Brown.
by G Fan in England on Feb 11, 2010 7:23 AM EST reply actions
LOL!
nice
If he’s BPA at #15 and they can’t trade back? Yea, get him. RB was the problem for the Giants last year, not run blocking.
They need the 3 headed monster again.
BTW..Jacobs deserves to be cut for his “I need surgery, but I’m gonna play in >12 games so I get my games played incentive”.
Jake, how do you get games played incentive when your not on the team?
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
Incentives
This is one of those reasons why some incentives are counter-productive.
by Ed Valentine on Feb 11, 2010 8:01 AM EST up reply actions
The thing is
the Giants could have paid him the incentive anyway if the injury was that bad that it could have been fixed by having surgery and missing 4 weeks.
So are we to assume the coaches did not know he was injured
by G Fan in England on Feb 11, 2010 8:04 AM EST up reply actions
I really don't think RB.....
was the biggest problem with the run game this past season. Sure, Jacobs is talking about his knee from game 1 on, but we didn’t get the OL play we got the previous 2 seasons. Seubert had a shoulder and was largely defficient in performance and Hedgecock wasn’t himself either.
Bradshaw playing on 2 broken feet wasn’t much help, even though he came through on several occasions.
We’ve really got an embarrassment of riches at RB, just had a rash of injuries. Ware has proven nothing, so he should go. Jacobs, Bradshaw, Brown & Johnson is a pretty good depth chart for us. If everybody returns healthy, RB would be at the bottom of the needs pile, playmaker or not.
Rushing in the NFL is completely reliant on solid O-line play. I know y’all will get tired of hearing me say this, but it all begins in the trenches.
Bleeding Blue since 1962
How so?
Jacobs and Ware are hurt since week 1, Bradshaw had the stress fracture in the first 5 (KC game I think?)….that’s the top 3 right there.
Who were the OL’s blocking for? Ware was out the first half the season, Jacobs was shot since the first week and AB went downhill since week 5 (just like the team).
THe top 2 have done nothing but be injured their entire career…what’s to expect they won’t again in 2010?
How could anyone reasonably expect Andre Brown to be 100% in 2010? His type of injury was a major one and one of those “he’ll probably be back to ‘normal’ in 2 years” type things, if he ever does.
Giants need a RB. Yea..he’s not gonna get 25 carries…but if he’s getting 10-15 carries at most, why not have a guy who can take it to the house on 10-15 carries?
Also, our return game is pretty stagnant. Hixon needs the planets to align to make anything happen.
Spiller would be the fastest player on the team.
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 9:49 AM EST up reply actions
Wow
You really never take the blinders off, do ya?
I don’t see any compelling argument here. You want to take a flyer on a utility back that’s so low on our need chart, he’d have to be the second coming of Tiki to not be risking JR’s job?
I think even you have agreed on several occasions that our needs start with the defense even though you seem to think RT is a hot spot. I just don’t get your line, man.
Almost every player Ed has posted a profile on has been a “must have” for you. You lock on, force your point without waivering, even in the face of logic.
Sometimes you make good points, but this one is a dead horse, blinders or not.
Bleeding Blue since 1962
Making a point on why it would be a good pick.
That’s all. Only things I’ve hated are trading up and drafting Taylor Mays
Never have I said get this one single player over all else, cuz that’s a moronic thing to do. Ignorant even…..
There’s plenty of options in round 1 and beyond to get a player the Giants can use, so maybe that’s why I say this could be a good pick?
Uncertainty is uncertainty, if you can’t see that the draft is that…then I have no idea what to tell you.
All I’m doing is saying why a particular prospect could work.
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 10:03 AM EST up reply actions
Nothing is certain...
…but I believe our staff, at least, has the sense to not be so flippant or fickle.
Bleeding Blue since 1962
really?
I know for a fact who I’d pick if I was making the 1st round pick. I’ve made a couple mock drafts and participated in a few user mock drafts….its either been Brian Price or Earl Thomas.
I’d expect the front office to look at all their options. Actually…Jerry Reese usually makes this same statement to everything, so he probably does look at everything.
Pointing out why it could make sense is all.
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 10:23 AM EST up reply actions
Waste of a pick
Running back is fast becoming one of the least valuable positions in the NFL. Plus the Giants have plenty of options at running back, and good backs can be found in the later rounds most years. Plus the need on defense are so glaring. I would seriously question the front office if they took Spiller in the first round rather than addressing the defense.
by Tucker Fredrickson on Feb 11, 2010 8:38 AM EST reply actions
least valuable?
have to totally disagree with you on that one. a RB will always be a highly valued position. Your telling me the likes of Ray Rice, Chris Johnson, Adrian peterson, Thomas Jones, Frank Gore, MJD, Ronnie Brown/Ricky Williams, deangelo williams, michael turner, etc etc play in low valued position? these guys all give thier team a way better chance of winning the game then if they werent there. The league may be becoming pass heavy, but a dominate run game will always be highly highly valuable. and you cant have that dominate run game without a serious playmaker. if CJ Spiller is the best on the board and our defense wants are all gone.. i say take him.
Is it baseball season yet??
by Plaxico Burress on Feb 11, 2010 9:46 AM EST up reply actions
Since I live in South Carolina I have seen most of Spiller's games.
He has had several 300 total yards games, including a record number of punts returned for touchdowns. He is a big time game breaker. At Clemson he caught way more passes than any of the wide receivers and is a natural at making huge yardage on screen plays. He definitely has world class speed.
On the other hand he is fairly small and has been hurt from time to time.
by giant fan since 57 on Feb 11, 2010 8:15 PM EST up reply actions
that's the thing
you can’t think of Spiller as just a running back. He does a little bit of everything, and that’s extremely valuable in today’s NFL.
2009 Did Not Happen
In my opinion Spiller is a more explosive return man
than Devin Hester. But unlike Hester, he is an accomplished receiver and already knows how to use his blockers.
Another plus for him is that he has been a perfect team player, always gave his coaches and teammates most of the credit for his success, and graduated early which says a lot about his determination.
by giant fan since 57 on Feb 12, 2010 5:34 PM EST up reply actions
I saw Spiller play against UMD this year
he had the best kickoff return I’ve ever seen in person, and he was just so much faster than anyone else on the field. Maryland isn’t exactly Florida, but they are an ACC team and Spiller was clearly the best player on the field. Here’s the play I’m talking about:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlyYj0HtY9c
2009 Did Not Happen
not smart at all
Last yr it wasnt all the running backs. The o-line was terrible in run blocking as well as pass blocking.We still have a stable that just had a down year,things happen players and units might have bad years in there careers.We need linebackers and defensive backs.This would be just a stupid pick right now.I love Spiller but we have way too many pressing needs on the other side of the ball to be picking a running back mid 1st round.I hope we can all trust reese and coughlin enough to not make a pick like this.
trade down rather than CJ
Agree with Ed.
This would be a luxury pick that the D cannot afford.
If ET and McClain are gone and the Giants do not see someone they are wild about, trade down, get more picks.
Jacobs and AB are not going anywhere. Brown in 2010 is anyone’s guess.
what if they're wild about Spiller?
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 9:30 AM EST up reply actions
This team isn't likely....
to be wild about a 1 down back. In fact, I don’t think the term “wild about” can be used for our front office. Maybe if we got incredible value at a position of high need, you might find someone saying they’re “wild about” it, after the fact, but Eli would probably be the closest thing to a player we just “had to have” in recent Giants history.
Besides, this kid is no Chris Johnson, and don’t forget who the last RB the Giants took in Rd. 1 was. Ron Dayne was considereda markedly higher prospect than Spiller. How’d that work out anyway?
Bleeding Blue since 1962
I dunno about Dayne being a better prospect then Spiller....
Shaun Alexander was the better rated RB at the time, Accorsi just had it in his thick mind that a big plodding RB from the big 10 is the answer for the NYG’s.
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 9:54 AM EST up reply actions
yea...
like more likely to be a bust…..
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 10:05 AM EST up reply actions
That is
because for a RB to beat out a QB for the Heisman, They must be REALLY good. QBs don’t have to put up as good of numbers to win it.
by mypisceannature on Feb 11, 2010 11:04 AM EST up reply actions
that's a ridiculous argument
How do you know he’s no Chris Johnson? He was better in college playing against tougher opponents than Johnson was.
Also, using Ron Dayne as an argument against Spiller is beyond asinine. First of all, they can’t even be compared as players – other than the fact that they are listed at the same position, they couldn’t be more different as players.
Second, here’s a partial list of running backs that have been drafted in the first round since Ron Dayne: Chris Johnson, Adrian Peterson, DeAngelo Williams, Ronnie Brown, Steven Jackson, Larry Johnson, LaDanian Tomlinson, Jamal Lewis, Thomas Jones, Deuce McAllister, Shaun Alexander.
2009 Did Not Happen
think they are too smart
to be wild about Spiller
Sorry FB. As the board pretty much agrees, you are pushing on a rope here
Unles a current RB gets moved out – this is a no-brainer.
After thinking about it
If we DO move back and Spiller is still there he would be a pretty good choice. Don’t forget Hixon is terrible at kick returns / punt returns so we would definitely get an upgrade there and if he can block he could make a great 3rd down back. If he can get used to running between the tackles in the NFL then he definitely has All-Pro potential.
by mclaren_is_the_best on Feb 12, 2010 2:56 AM EST up reply actions
Spiller May Not Be a Bad Option
It’s obvious that the Giants have plenty of needs other than rb, but passing up a game-breaking player could be a mistake. Did the Titans really need another rb when they drafted Chris Johnson? Nope, everyone thought they were crazy. Did the Vikings need another rb when they drafted Adrian Peterson? Nope, people thought they were crazy too. I don’t know much about Spiller, but if he is in these other two guy’s class then I wouldn’t be upset with the pick. Superstar talent is hard to come by, so why pass up a potential superstar because we need a dt or lb. If we reach at those positions we’ll be having the same damn discussion next year and the year after…
and now they lose Taylor
Chester Taylor is a very very good RB and they will lose him this off-season
The Only option to me is......
A LB whether it be Mcclain, spikes, weatherspoon, kindle just please take a game changing LB, i would not take a DT simply because we have some good ones and there are people like vince wilfork and richard seymour who will be FA and can both play inside in our scheme…….also at safety an ex giant ryan clarke from the steelers is a FA and would be good with KP if healthy or you can get myron rolle in a later round but 1st round simply has to be an LB.
But dont tell em i told you that !!!!!
Any other year I'd love to have him
but our defense was so bad that I don’t know how you justify a running back with the 1st round pick. CJ would add a dimension to this offense that we haven’t had for awhile, but I don’t see it happening.
CJ is basically a Reggie Bush clone, but a little faster.
by ggggmen08 on Feb 11, 2010 9:59 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
this offeseason is improbable and out of the way but here it is……
Trade osi to ny for Kerry Rhodes and a 2nd or 3rd rounder. Then our safety situation is shored up.
Pick up Julius peppers in free agency and sign him to a monster deal before Dan snyder doubles it. Pay him the money. Well have the best d end combo in the league with kiwi, tuck and peps.
Lastly, since we have those extra picks, we will be able to trade up and draft Rolando mcclain. Then from then on, we draft the best player available.
That’s a revamped defense…… Who likes that idea and who doesn’t??
by MIKES92 on Feb 11, 2010 10:04 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Peppers = Osi + 3 inches and 30lbs
and about $50 million guaranteed. Also, Peppers takes plays off, which Osi really doesn’t (just looks like he does).
I hate the idea of Peppers
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 10:06 AM EST up reply actions
aggressive Mikes
I like that – and Rhodes might be a worthwhile risk (underline risk)
but Peppers is prob the wrong guy
Very $$$$ and very “me first”
I would rather see our new DC get Osi motivated and ready for a good year
Even if we don’t get peppers, just by trading osi gives us a great safety, and extra draft picks to move up and get Rolando mcclain. I know he’d be very expensive but if he wants to play, he’s well worth it. I’m only saying sign peppers to have a great d end opposite of tuck. Kiwi is very fine though. Look at what trading osi can do for the giants
by MIKES92 on Feb 11, 2010 10:24 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
if all this happened
I would be just fine with it, but
Peppers – do not think the Gmen want to pay that kind of $$$ ( I dispute any rumors of really paying Hansworth big bucks)
Osi COULD easily come back for a monster year
I’m a big fan of osi. Trust me. I’m just saying… Look at all the positives that would come out of it if we traded him
- safety
- trade up for mcclain with extra draft picks
- getting rid of unhappy osi ( I’ll quit if I don’t start )
by MIKES92 on Feb 11, 2010 10:41 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Agreed
Peppers would be way to expensive, and I’m almost certain that Osi will have a better year than Julius does, especially after getting the payday he’ll get.
Osi = $3M
Peppers = $14M or very close(He was getting over $16M with the franchise tag)
The math is pretty clear.
Bleeding Blue since 1962
A one year deal is at least 2x what a multi-year deal gets.
I suspect that he will get less than Jared Allen or Dwight Freeney, so I think his number is more like $6M per year plus the bonus
Just a guess 4 years, $36M it’ll avg to $9M per
by giantblue63 on Feb 11, 2010 12:53 PM EST up reply actions
If the Giants made this pick it would say to me that they are still stubbornly adhering to their run-heavy strategy when to me it is obvious that their best asset is the passing game. I’d much rather us spend our 1st rounder on a defensive player even if, god-forbid, he is not quite the BPA. Our offense will be just fine with the RBs we have, especially if we open it up a bit and let Eli do his thing.
We've never really been run heavy, just balanced
We have, however, been a run first team and we have to, playing in the NE. We have the best passing attack we may have ever had, but if you can’t run in our division you have little chance of success. Unless you believe we should be like Andy Reid.
Bleeding Blue since 1962
if we're opening it up...
wouldn’t a RB like Spiller make that easier?
He’s much more comfortable catching the ball then the guys on the roster (AB could be, but they don’t throw him the ball other then screens).
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 10:28 AM EST up reply actions
Spending a 1st round pick on a 3rd down back is a bad idea, especially when you have more pressing needs. Besides, most rookie RBs have a real tough time with pass-blocking, so I assume the coaching staff would prefer to have a more experienced back protecting Eli.
Agreed, although ...
I think maybe you can spend a 1st Rounder on a Percy Harvin type that is going to significantly upgrade your special teams as well as 3rd down efficiency.
But even that should be only if we are trading down in the first round, IMO.
Spiller is also a good returns player
and a good receiver out of the backfield. But I still think that you help the offense most by improving the FB.
Hedgecock tho an excellent lead blocker, does not pick up the blitz well, and can’t catch the ball worth a beep.
If they pick up a FB that may be a little less G and a little more RB, it could pay big dividends. Just the threat that the FB will swing out for a pass could force teams to play a little more honest run D against us.
The kingdom was lost for the want of a nail sorta thing.
by giantblue63 on Feb 11, 2010 12:57 PM EST up reply actions
Last year, we were willing to pay 80 mil$ to haynesworth. Now, if we pay a little more, we get the 2nd best d end in the league. By trading osi, we get extra draft picks to move up and draft mcclain and we get an excellent safety in kherry Rhodes.
by MIKES92 on Feb 11, 2010 10:18 AM EST via mobile reply actions
2nd best d end in the league only when he feels like it
which isn’t all that often
by mclaren_is_the_best on Feb 12, 2010 2:59 AM EST up reply actions
There's something wrong with your proposal.
Something called the salary cap.
Bleeding Blue since 1962
Uncapped year this year probably.
I’m just giving a proposal. If you don’t like it, give your opinion of what the gmen should do this offseason.
by MIKES92 on Feb 11, 2010 10:26 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Trade up...
get Suh! (Hey, haven’t said it in a while). On a serious note, I am going to agree with a lot of the other peope and vote No on Spiller. Get a first round OL before a RB, but should be addressing the defense at least in the first 2 or 3 rounds.
I think we're OK at RB
If the Giants are sitting at 15 and DTs are a reach, and Thomas is gone and we’re not looking at good value in our position of need, and Spiller is sitting there… I’d still say find a team that desperately needs a running back and see what they’ll give us for the pick.
Defense, Defense, Defense!
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Feb 11, 2010 10:43 AM EST reply actions
YES!
feast on D in the draft
if we did not draft a single player on O we would be OK ( not recommended mind you, but O is in better shape than D)
Yeah, it's got to be something like 5-2 for D picks ...
and 3 out of the first 4. Unless … we get some significant FA or trade action between now and Draft Day.
Like the kid, but...
The number of needs the Giants have on the defensive side of the ball (From ED).
That my friends is the kicker, or the answer…Let’s stop and think long & hard, cuz the Giants have not a pick this high in the draft for awhile. I feel the absolute first pick at #15
(Or higher if they could move up) has to be DL. Robbins looks shot,and Bernard was just awful, I would keep Cofield (if there is no agreement w/th the union a RFA,
if they get an agreement, he will be UFA), they also have Alford back at hopefully Canty healthy and productive. We need somebody to get some needed push up front.
The Giants also have a kid coming back from IR at running back, Andre or Adrian Brown?
In that part of the first round, need somebody to play right away.
Defensive tackle
we need somebody somebody big to free up our linebackers, Look a few years ago everybody thought Ray Lewis lost a step then they got NGATA and ray turned back in to a beast. Dtackle is the way to go and i’ll pay WILfork before i pay Peppers he’s good but not worth the money asking
Waning Reliance on Running Game?
I am going to come right out and say it…
Those who seek to diminish the value of the Running Game in “Today’s” NFL are lost. In the post-superbowl evaluation of “why the Colts lost”, the common thread i heard was “the Colts need to run the ball more and keep their offense diverse”
Teams like the Ravens and Jets, teams with GLARING holes, actually had a shot this year BECAUSE they dedicated themselves to running the ball and playing good defense.
Nobody will ever get me to believe that the importance of running the ball in the NFL has diminished one bit. For all of the “pass-happy” crowd-pleasing teams that have brought all the hype like the Randy Moss Vikings, the greatest show on Turf, the Colts, the Chargers, the Cardinals – the number of championships those teams have produced is minimal.
Running the ball and playing good defense is GIANT football. And I hope that does not change. I never had any aversion to 3yds and cloud of dust – ball control – or playing tight games. I think it translates to a winning formula and I think the model still holds today.
All that said, we can’t take Spiller. We have too many needs on D. If McCluster fell to a later round, I would take him.
by dubsrub on Feb 11, 2010 11:51 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
You wanted it, you got it.(Per Mike S92)
As you have seen, the Giants rarely enter into a bidding war on top flight talent. Therefore, you won’t see them in the market for Peppers, even if his price came down a little. Osi, regardless of his recent outburst, is a bargain at $3M and will have a good year(contract and 2nd year back from a knee).
Kenny Philips will be back at whatever level possible. I don’t believe it should be the typical recovery for a knee, since it wasn’t ligament damage. After all he was playing on the injury with very little pain, but it was swelling up after games and causing him to miss practice. We can probaly get a very good SS in a later round and there are a couple of pretty good prospects in Vince Anderson and Sharef Rashad, who are on our practice squad.
This leaves us with what I believe we should do.
Rd. 1 If we’re lucky enough, McClain will fall to us. If not, the next MLB is only a 2nd Rd. value. If we stay at #15, we get the best DT available. Price or Williams will be here, but until the combine, the rest of the field may develop.
If we trade out of #15 for more picks, we still have a shot at these guys and it opens us up to pick in other categories, such as MLB and Safety. Our first pick needs to be one of immediate impact, so RB and OL are out of the question and we have a pretty good stable at DE, WR & CB, regardless of what people believe. I know the coaches believe we’ve got the talent there.
Immediate impact, not halfway through the season(ala Nicks). This would bring DT, MLB & S to the surface. Of those, DT is the highest need, because we pretty much know what we have there.
I have no doubt that Canty will have a better year in 2010. How much better is another story. Cofield isa quality player, much better than he showed, and sometimes it’s better to fly under the radar at DT.Alford was coming into his own before the injury. Bernard is just not even worth talking about. We DO know that we need the depth for rotation and a kid like Price or Williams would give us a solid middle.
MLB is a bit of a head scratcher. AP was having a good, almost bounce back, season before the injury, but we have seen his physical skills decline. He is still a wonderful defensive quarterback with mad recognition talent. That being said, we need his replacement on the roster, now. Is Goff the answer? Probably not, as he did nothing to distinguish himself last year. This need is pretty equal to the DT position.
Safety is a high risk/reward position. I think we nailed it with KP, but haven’t had too much luck with some previous players. It’s shown itself in the league time and time again. Roy Williams and Michael Huff come to mind.
Rd. 2 If McClain doesn’t fall to us and we stick at #15 here is where we get our MLB or S. On the outside chance we’re looking at OT here, there is an abundance of OT available in Rd. 1 and I see a possible 3 falling to us.
At MLB, Washington or Spikes will fit here. Spikes may not be all he was cracked up to be and Washington is a little small, but has the frame to add and is very aggressive and fast*.
At S, Chad Jones or Nate Allen(of course if Thomas is here it’s a different story, but he won’t be(even if I think he’s a little small)) are very attractive here. Jones has good size and speed, but will require more coaching at the NFL level and Allen, I think is the best prospect after Berry at this position. KP is our FS, but I’ve heard Dave Merritt say several times that they are interchangeable, so having 2 FS’s that can lay the wood would make our D-backfield a scary place to be going up for a pass.
At OT, which I don’t think is a real need, there are 3 that could fall to us and, if available, would be hard to turn down by value alone. If Bulaga or USC’s Brown fall to us here it’s almost impossible to look away. If Williams is there, we have to decide if RT is enough of a need for us.
I believe we already have solid line depth, especially at RT. McKenzie actually had a good year as revealed in his stats. Guy Whimper is a perfectly serviceable RT back-up. Beatty is our next starting LT and did pretty well backing up McKenzie and Diehl or Booth can step in in a pinch. With Diehl, Seubert, Ohara, Snee, McKenzie, Beatty, Booth, Whimper, Koets and the new kid, Taylor, we’ll be trimming before we’re adding at this position.
If we were lucky enough to get McClain, then we should go DT here, because there are some great prospects to be had here. Odrick, Houston or, especially Cam Thomas are all worthy of a pick at our Rd. 2 spot.
Rd. 3 Now we’ve got 2 of our 3 main defensive need positions filled, we can either fill the 3rd need or look for depth at other postions, including OL..
At S, Stuckey, Jones & Florida’s Major Wright are all good at this pick
At MLB. if Spikes is still on the board(highly unlikely) he would be a steal, but I think we’ve already got our guy at this point. Angerer, Chaney and Lee may be available in the 4th and I wouldn’t take any of them before then.
at DT, if we don’t have one and Cam Thomas falls to us, jump. If not, I love this kid, Geno Artkins’ athleticism, but think he might get swallowed up at the next level if left at DT(He needs to add bulk which may slow him). I believe he is more of a tweener like Tuck. There’s nobody else here that warrants a #3.
At OT, there’s not a prospect I like in this round.
That’s my current draft strategy for the first 3 rounds.
Bleeding Blue since 1962
Pierce
I have to disagree on that Pierce was having a “bounceback” type year before he went down.
Like Robbins, I think he lost a full step or two this offseason.
I said almost "bounceback
His stats we similar to 2008, but we could see he played a little faster with the weight loss.
Bleeding Blue since 1962
Peppers
Played a whole season in 2007 and had 2 and a half sacks. Peppers was payed 16 mill last year and will want more money. Peppers is older than Osi and seems like he comes with his own baggage. I just don’t see why paying that much more for a minimal upgrade seems like a good idea…
By The Way
Even though I admit DeSean Jackson is a scary dude, and he has produced like he was supposed to produce for the Eagles – How much does he really help a team that cannot run for a first down on 3rd and 1? If you convert in that situation, you cannot succeed in the playoffs, in often inclement weather.
I like Andy Reid – but the Eagles are pig-headed about their inability to run the ball – to the point like Mike Martz was pigheaded about not caring about how many turnovers his team made – coincidentally, they are both going to end up with the same fate.
Didnt this guy
have fumble problems? I dont want to use a 1st round pick on a guy whos gonna turn the ball over. All-Day AP is the best back in the league but he turns the ball over. They couldnt go to him at the end of the NFC championship because of fumble problems.
This league is full of backs who were late round picks or UDFA’s. So much of it is a function of line and system. There are dozens of guys out there who can run a 4.5 and carry the ball, but were not as high profile as this kid.
Its not worth it.
CJ doesn't fumble
His only fumble of the season came in the bowl game. That’s pretty good for a guy that is touching it on KO returns, punt returns, running, and receiving the ball.
The bottom-line is you have to select the best player on the board..
No matter whether it is defense or offense..Obviously if there is a choice we need defense first and foremost..but the Giants aren’t going to trade up unless they have an eye on a DT they like..that would be the only reason they would do that…Not for a Spiller..and he is not a fumbler, no more than any game breaker is.
"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"
CJ Spiller
He is worth the 15th pick, and if he’s there and Rolando and ET are off the board someone will try and trade up to get him. I think we trade down in this scenario. I love the kids potential and his gamebreaking speed, it’s just the Giants have been good at finding quality RBs late in the draft. I don’t think it would be a waste of a pick, I just don’t see it happening. I 100 percent agree with sunlion that the battles are in the trenches. Good Oline and Dline play wins games. But if the Giants do decide to draft Spiller I wouldn’t be too upset. I think we go after a LB or S in FA, maybe both. Not too many rooks are goin to step in and contribute immediately.
Meaning
Spiller is one of a few that will have an immediate impact. He will go off next year, and why not it be for the Gmen. Players like Harvin, Cribbs, Hester, Jackson, Bush, Sproles…this is what CJ Spiller does, he’s a gamebreaker, an immediate impact. I do not see Price, Williams or really any DT taken in the first (outside Suh/McCoy)being the savior of our Dline next year. Not saying it would be bad to draft Price/Big Dan, but I just feel that only a few rookies have a chance to make immediate impacts, let alone earn a starting spot.
Based on recent trends
The chance of hitting a HR on a 1st round RB is lessening.
Remember Chris Johnson was the 5th back taken
AP was selected 7th in spite of being proto-typical in all aspects (power, speed, etc) because of this
Plenty of very good backs get taken in 2nd round or later.
From that draft class, Jonathon Stewart is pretty damn good (not just against the Giants)
Felix Jones is basically exhibit A for what Spiller could be…I think Spiller’s 3x the prospect Jones is too.
Darren McFadden plays on the Raiders, does that count? I don’t think so. I’d take run DMC if he was out there tho, maybe its just Oakland?
Mendenhall is damn good too when he’s healthy.
The early return on a RB is probably the greatest of all positions, save for maybe MLB (which is why I’d take McClain..but McClain only in the first round for MLB)
Also from that AD draft, Marshawn Lynch, again when he plays, is damn good.
This class of RB’s does seem quite deep, and if they likes someone better then Spiller, and want a RB, they could wait to get someone like Joe McKnight (he’s the one with fumbling issues)
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 3:15 PM EST up reply actions
Lets really look at those names
Jones – a part timer who gets injured frequently
McFadden – who knows, he played in a wild cat offense with Jamarcus at QB
Mendenhall – definitely has shown flashes, but not a HR
Lynch – insanely overrated and got benched because of it
They are all fine players and if I thought the Giants desperately needed a RB they would be upgrades, but unless they are cutting Jacobs and a guy like Chester Taylor isn’t available to pick up 200 carries/recpts, I’d use my picks on other things.
Though if they think that he could change the team’s offense as a receiver, I’d be more amenable. I thought that was woefully missing the last 2 years.
Exactly.
my point on Spiller is that he’d be a dynamic playmaker on the offense….basically what the Giants haven’t had in forever.
3rd down back? I don’t think so…my like “Back they use when they run the shotgun”.
You know, a safety valve weapon for Eli? Someone who can actually catch a short dumpoff pass, and take it to the house?
Why is this not a good idea?
Bye, AP :(
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 4:37 PM EST up reply actions
From what I have seen, the team hasn't incorporated the safety valve concept
since Tiki left the team.
Eli could easily up his comp pct if he completed the 95 passes to RBs that Drew Brees did. They would get better at simply moving the chains.
But i think that your argument also calls for a coaching change, because TC does not seem like a fan of the flat pass/swing pass.
really?
Tiki had a ton of receptions with the Giants during Coughlin’s time. I dunno if Spiller would ever develop into a Tiki type weapon, but I know for a fact he’s got those sort of hands.
Bye, AP :(
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 5:54 PM EST up reply actions
Check the numbers
2004 Tiki Barber goes from Hi 60’s low 70’s in catches to low 50’s as soon as TC gets here.
Total touches were about the same, because his carries went up. Given that we are talking about a 5-10 200 lbs guy, who had a great first cut, it is startling.
Post Tiki the number of passes completed to backs went to 58-52-42 (I ignore the FB)
It makes no sense to me.
by giantblue63 on Feb 11, 2010 11:16 PM EST up reply actions
AP is officially gone
Just saw it on sportscenter
by Gmen_Fan_Forever on Feb 11, 2010 1:35 PM EST reply actions
What did they say?
"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"
Nothin much on sportscenter
but here’s an article about it
http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2010/02/ny_giants_release_linebacker_a.html
by Gmen_Fan_Forever on Feb 11, 2010 2:49 PM EST up reply actions
Goff
could be a good linebacker if we keep gaurds and tackles off him without good Dtackles we will have the same problem this season. a good tackle will also help OSi
Spiller
Would definitely be the sexy pick, but I’d be surprised if Pete Carroll doesn’t snatch him up right before us. You can find RB’s later on in the draft, Giants have too many needs on D to neglect. The fact is we haven’t picked this high in years so the possibilities are endless! We are all like “kids in a candy store”
CJ Spiller
I have always maintained that teams should draft the player that is rated highest on their board regardless of need. However, considering the current state of the Giants’ D, you would think that they will draft the highest rated defensive player available in the 1st round. I can only see them taking an offensive player in round 1 if they do not believe a defensive player is still available that is rated high enough to illicit consideration of a 1st round pick.
You guys have covered this well,
but one more thing to think about:
If McClain’s gone and Spiller drops to us (he won’t, but…) we should at least consider him. A great RB covers for a deficient defense by keeping it off the field.
I left my swagger in my other pants.
KR gives us good field position too
tho he may keep the defense on the field after he breaks off 65yd TD runs :)
Rectum? Damn near killed em!
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
I know this is CJ Spiller but, anyone have a good feeling about Carlos Dunlap
At 6-6 290 and a legit pass rusher he could be a 10 yr pro bowler but in some ways reminds me of Willy Jo (why didn’t he do more at FLA?)
If he is a true pass rusher, at that size, could be the guy to turn the defense around. He could bull rush thru most LT’s and RT’s and many double teams. But the scouting report that he was lazy against bad teams scares me.
lazy against bad teams...
best player on the defense against good teams.
Mario Williams and Julius Peppers were well documented “lazy college players who took plays off”.
Dunlap has that sort of size and talent.
He did play a lot inside too, so the 4 horsemen line could be upon us (Kiwi-Tuck-Dunlap-Osi).
Only question is if JR figures he’s in the right state of mind to be a NYG pick and also…does he workout so well that Al Davis takes him?
Bye, AP :(
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 4:39 PM EST up reply actions
Lets take him..
and play him in a 5 man rotation with Osi, Tuck, Kiwi and Sintim.
We will call it “the 5-headed Monster”
Each guy will play about 10 plays a game thus conserving them as our ends for the next 10 years.
On second thought, I’d take a DT since we have none that can play.
First Sintim is a LB
2nd the pass rush last year was non existent. If Dunlap is the real deal, you grab him and work out the details later.
Remember Tuck started out as a situational pass rusher at DT. As FB suggested Dunalp and Tuck at DT on passing downs could be a total defense changer.
by giantblue63 on Feb 11, 2010 11:30 PM EST up reply actions
Dunlap can play DE on passing downs.
And I dunno about you, but as far as I know about the draft, this is about the future, not really 2010.
Osi could be gone if he plays his way out of NY. Kiwi may or may not get extended long term when his deal’s up (I think they keep him)
If Dunlap pans out, that’s to very large bookeneds.
Bye, AP :(
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 11:30 PM EST up reply actions
**Dunlap can play DT on passing downs.
He did that with Florida.
Also…6"6 290lbs….kinda sounds like a DT? That’s bigger then Justin Tuck
Bye, AP :(
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 11, 2010 11:30 PM EST up reply actions
I Hear too much talk of need on this board!!!!!!!!! Its BPA only boys!!!!
I think most importantly you evaluate your team then the draft and make it all fit together.IMHO I would like to build a passing team on offense and a pass heavy def.Pass heavy def being pass rush and ballhawk and if its not Mcclain in round 1 then wait for the 3rd at MLB b/c if we pass better than last year we run up the score and if they pass they get killed and picked off b/c running wont be an option if we do a little more no huddle and a little more playaction 4 crying out loud if Nicks makes the same size leap as HAM did this year and Barden can cure our redzone probs then all this should work really well.So you build a team where the parts work as a system.That is what i think a team is.That being said if BPA is Spiller than grab him…reminds me of Jamaal Charles.If u think playaction works great with him and you know you’ll do it more which is no given and ET isn’t there and you don’t like Price enough than take ’em.
Throwing out another name...
Anyone else on here familiar with Dexter McCluster? I’m not sure where he’s going to fall in the draft – but this he is a phenomenal RB coming out of Ole Miss that I would love to see the Giants pick up, if we’re going to use a draft pick on a RB.
He’s small – 5’8" 185lbs, but the boy is wiry and slippery as hell. If the O line can open up a sliver of a hole, he’ll find it. This year he became the first player in SEC history to rush for 1,000 yards and receive for 500 yards in the same season. I’m sure most of you guys didn’t get to see an Ole Miss game this year (unless you watched the Cotton Bowl), but he is explosive. Take a look at his stats and see what you think: http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=191216
Reminds me of Sproles
"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"
How about a kicker???
Wouldn’t it be nice to see a kickoff finally make it to the end zone instead of consistently being fielded above the 10-yard line? Giving the opposition a starting cushion most of the time is a foolish burden to keep.
Yeah they need to do something about that..Hopefully Tynes will improve..
I’d hate to see them draft a kicker….what a waste that would be
"When I was a boy and had no sense I got my pecker stuck in an electric fence..Well it curled my hair and tickled my balls, and made me shit in my overalls"
Hopefully that guy
Sam Swank can do deep kickoffs
by mclaren_is_the_best on Feb 12, 2010 2:49 PM EST up reply actions
This thread is a few days old, so people might not see this
but just in case, here’s some video of Spiller and why I would be thrilled if the Giants took him:
running back: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sH3AO_jvvvY&feature=related
pass catcher: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzhzMt6MvCY
punt returner: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHKghRHiGv4&feature=related
kick returner: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlyYj0HtY9c&feature=related
2009 Did Not Happen
if you notice in the KR one...
Jacoby Ford is #6.
He’s fast too :)
Bye, AP :(
by FreeBradshaw on Feb 13, 2010 10:40 AM EST up reply actions

by 


















