Life with Lawrence Tynes -- do the Giants have to keep living it?
"Kickers are like horse manure. They're all over the place."
-- Former Tampa Bay coach John McKay
"Football kickers are like taxi cabs. You can always go out and hire another one."
-- Former NFL coach Buddy Ryan (1986)
These terrific quotes about placekickers are appropriate today because we need to talk about Lawrence Tynes, the incredibly irritating and inconsistent kicker for our New York Giants.
The 21-yard field goal Tynes missed Sunday against Tampa Bay was the shortest miss by a Giants' kicker since Dec. 19, 1981, when Joe Danelo was unsuccessful from the same distance. It marks two weeks in a row Tynes has missed from inside 30 yards, and that is simply inexcusable in an age where top-flight NFL kickers are nearly automatic inside 40 yards.
Tom Coughlin flatly said "No" Monday when asked if the Giants would work out any potential replacement kickers this week in light of Tynes' recent struggles. He also said this about Tynes.
"I think sometimes what has to happen is as you practice then you have to carry it over into game day. Sometimes there is a little bit of an adjustment that – for whatever reason – is going on that you would like to just stick with what has been good for you and what you have practiced."
To be honest, I really don't know what Coughlin is talking about there. I think it's just a bunch of coach-speak' for 'this is a topic I really don't want to talk about.'
Fact is, though, Tynes' erratic right foot is something I think we -- and the Giants coaching staff -- need to talk about. As I write this (prior to the Monday Night game), 53 field goals have been attempted inside 30 yards thus far this season. Only two have been missed -- both by Tynes. Yikes!
When I think about Tynes I ... I ... I don't know what to think. I get a headache trying to figure him out.
He obviously does not lack for courage. His game-winning kick in Green Bay which sent the Giants to the Super Bowl two seasons ago tells you that. As does his game-winner in Dallas in Week 2, which he had to kick twice.
He has a good track record, having made 100-of-125 kicks (80%) in his six-year career. Inside 30 yards, by the way, this season's two misses give him just three (36-of-39) in his career.
His kickoffs are sometimes deep, booming ones. At other times, they are ugly bouncers. Sometimes, they are high, short ones that land at the 15.
A week ago I wrote this about Tynes. "Tynes is probably the perfect kicker for this team. An imperfect guy who drives you up the wall, but always seems to make the kick that counts."
Was I right? Was I nuts? Is Tynes a quality kicker just going through a bit of a rough stretch? Is he a terrible kicker the Giants are winning in spite of? I just don't know. He has, at times, made things more difficult for the Giants. He has never, that I can remember, gone all Jay Feely in Seattle and cost the Giants a game.
I guess the best question to ask would be, is there anyone else out there who is better?
Available Kickers
If you want to go the way the Giants did last season and try to find the second coming of John Carney, the best choice might be long-time Baltimore Ravens kicker Matt Stover. An 18-year veteran, the 41-year-old Stover is out of work after kicking for the Ravens the past 13 seasons. He was 27-of-33 for Baltimore last season, including 23-of-24 inside 40 yards. I reached out to our friends at the Ravens blog 'Baltimore Beatdown,' for info on Stover. This is part of what I got from 'Beatdown.'
The problem I have w/ him is that outside of 40 yards he is far from accurate and has zero distance. ... Also Stover's issue is depth on kickoffs and carrying two kickers takes up a valuable roster spot that I'm not in favor of. I say keep Tynes over Stover.
So, unless you pretty much never want to make a field goal longer than 40 yards, and you want to see Carney-esque kickoffs, Stover might not be the best idea.
Matt Bryant? The ex-Giant was 33-of-38 for Tampa Bay last season with his only misses coming from outside 40 yards. He is just 33. Bryant, though, was the Giants' kicker in the infamous 'Trey Junkin Game' in 2003, and I just am not sure I could stomach having to think about that game every time the Giants line up for a field goal.
I also reached out to the other SB Nation football bloggers for names of young kickers who impressed them during camp before being released. I heard names like Graham Gano (Ravens), Dave Rayner (Redskins) and Shane Andrus (Colts).
None of these guys has enough of a track record that you can be sure they are any more trustworthy than Tynes.
Maybe the best thing we can do is hope Tynes gets his head straight and stops missing easy kicks that make everyone's lives that much harder -- and shorter.
168 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Alex Karras
said they weren’t football players and when they kicked FGs, they ran around screaming, “Me keeck football, me keeck football!”
It's a shame.
I wish we could get fsu’s kicker from last year, he was auto-f$&@ing-matic.
by ianwestpalm on Sep 29, 2009 7:45 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
You're talking about Graham Gano?
Well, he wasn’t very good for the ravens in the preseason.
President of the Ramses Barden Fan Club
by Hoyadestroya85 on Sep 29, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Off-topic
did anyone see some Buccaneer S*head take a cheap-shot blindside on Feagles during punt coverage? What a punk. He didn’t rock him or anything but threw a shoulder 20 yards from the action and sent the Feags to the turf. He could be your dad, man. No need for that kind of cheap shot away from the action.
You play to win the game!
Be careful for what you wish for
Not that the Giants were going to bring anyone in anyways, but if the FA’s have question marks, you might as well stick with who we have. For the sake of the fans, let’s hope we never have to rely on Tynes to kick a game winner ever again! lol
Funny thing is
He seems to do fine w/the game-winners. It’s all those kicks that would make the game-winners unnecessary that seem to be the problem. In the end, I think we just have to learn to live with Tynes’ ups and downs.
by Ed Valentine on Sep 29, 2009 8:13 AM EDT up reply actions
He's the Shaquille O'Neal of the NFL...
He makes them when he needs to the most!
"We're only going to score 17 points?!" - Tom Brady
but if he made them in the first place, these times when he needed to the most wouldn't exist.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
His kickoffs aren't deep and like Stover he also struggles +40 yards.
Tynes is clutch but he’s a Stover clone and that maybe a good thing for Tynes if he can play 18 years. Keep Tynes until we find our Vinatieri.
We could have had our "Vinateri"
His name is Matt Stover, he was a Giants draft pick
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Sep 29, 2009 9:28 AM EDT up reply actions
Tynes
Nothing scares me more than seeing Tynes line up for a kick. Even a meaningless three pointer left to boost the score—it scares the crap out of me. I will give it to Tynes, he’s come through. At Green Bay obviously, and most recently in Dallas he’s proven himself to be a clutch kicker when the time comes, but I’m still always going to be furious that we have a kick who misses extra points.
I’m still a bit torn about Tynes role however. Sure he misses a lot, but there’s also a fair amount of responsibility that should be placed on our “Green Zone” offense to eliminate the needs for 21 yarders. That said, Tynes should still make them, but I don’t recall Carney missing a single field goal until the playoffs and we still won games in nail bitters. That’s just Giants style I guess.
However the idea that Tynes is our perfect kicker because he’s inconsistant, yet reliable in the clutch doesn’t quite work because we’re no longer that team, are we? We’re not the 9-7 New York Giants squeaking into the playoffs—we’re the 3-0 defending #1 NFC Seed who possess a franchise quarterback, stout lines on both sides, a dangerous running game, and a corps of young wide receivers who have been quickly proving themselves. I don’t see how Tynes missing a 21-yarder makes him the perfect kicker to a team that shows tremendous skill in just about every other position.
Ugh, I made this too long, but honestly Tynes is the one Giants player I could do without. I hate that he misses gimmie field goals, but I really hate that he can miss extra points. Yes, at the end of the day I would much rather him miss an extra point and a field goal if he still kicks the game winning points, but there’s gotta be better options… in the draft. I wouldn’t waste time in the Free Agency when depth at kicker isn’t our biggest concern. Next year I’d like one late round draft pick be used to snatch us up a new kicker who at the very least can compete with Tynes for the starting job.
Draft pick?
That’s a waste of a pick. You can get a quality one on the cheap as an FA.
Tynes misses big kicks too
Don’t forget that the game against Green Bay wouldn’t have gone to overtime if Tynes made 1 out of 2 kicks down the stretch for us. I don’t trust him as far as I could throw him. Plus, his kickoffs aren’t any better than Carney’s from last year. Graham Gano is a much better option.
100% agree...
Well said. The article above conveniently leaves that tidbit out about the misses against GB.
I think he will inevitably cost us a game and I’d rather we cut him before he has the chance to do that.
Well
The Green Bay misses made it more difficult, but did not cost us a game. That is what I said initially.
by Ed Valentine on Sep 29, 2009 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Its tough to find a reliable kicker
especially for the Giants. The Patriots found one out of nowhere when they got rid of Vinateri and got Gostkowski.
Tynes is OK. He’s got a stronger leg than Carney and he’s getting better on the kickoffs.
Doesn’t matter who the kicker is, he’s gonna piss us off at somepoint. I don’t like Tynes any more than the next fan, but he’s the Gints kicker and I don’t think there’s really any better option out there for now.
Saying it will cost the Giants a game is stupid. Will it? Maybe, but it hasn’t. If it really becomes a problem, then Id expect them to deal with it.
A possible option is Olindo Mare. He’s been trashed this week by his coach in the media, so maybe they cut him. Maybe its at an opportune time when Tynes has a bad game? Mare’s a better kicker than Tynes to me.
What the f$%k is the internet?
Agree with everything but
Mare. He was a good kicker, but he seems to moving downward. He had a terrible 2007 (good 2008 though) and doesn’t look good this year.
He missed 2 kicks this year
and 2007 he was hurt really bad.. either way he isn’t going to be cut by the Seahawks… heres an article about it…
Mare
He is a better kicker but Mora already said he isn’t brining in a kicker to work out so that blasting him to the media was just to get Mare motivated… Don’t expect Mare to be cut anytime soon.. Tynes is the best option as of now there isn’t anyone worth picking up
What you guys fail to realize...
Is that although he’s imperfect, I can’t think of a time when I thought to myself “Damn, Tynes really cost us the game today.”
Before Tynes there was Feeley, and my god we all remember what he did in Seattle. Last year there was Carney, and I actually remember thinking to myself after the Philadelphia playoff game “If Tynes was kicking, we would have won.”
You can criticize him for missing the first two field goals in historically the most difficult environment to ever kick field goals in, during the ’07 Championship game, or you can praise him for having the guts to walk back out there (with Coughlin unable to decide himself) and attempt, and make, a third to send us to the show.
So until Tynes actually costs us a game, I’m behind him 10000%
That’s my kicker sniffle sniffle that’s my team mate, it’s not fair sniffle sniffle.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 9:14 AM EDT reply actions
There you go (T)it(O). Let’s leave the crying to that clown in Buffalo. I will agree with you though, Tynes is our only option right now. What happens if we get another kicker and he misses a chip shot. Can’t go cutting kickers everytime they miss a short one. Tynes makes it interesting but at least he hasn’t killed us. Besides, he’s good for our health. He will get your heart rate up.
Yes you're right he hasn't yet cost us a game...
but he’s deifnitely made them interesting. I’d rather we get rid of him before he does cost us a game because with the way he is, it seems inevitable.
Besides, you’re basing this on the fact that he might not have missed an FG to lose the game at the end, etc. What you’re not counting is that he nearly “Feely’d” us against Green Bay in the Conf Championship. His misses have also changed strategy during the course of some games in the ’07-08 yrs that if not directly leading to a loss, certainly contributed.
Seriously, I don’t know why they didn’t even bring in competition for him. It’s clear they don’t have 100% confidence in him, else they would have let him get his job back last year. Still they are married enough to him that they won’t just let him go. To not even bring in someone to compete with him in the preseason was a dumb move.
What we should have done
was trade for Ochocinco – he could have become our no 1 WR and our Kicker at the same time.
Simple – TC would love him as he plays multiple positions (OK I jest on TC).
I would say let us have a poll vote on this…but I think we all know the answer!
by G Fan in England on Sep 29, 2009 9:39 AM EDT reply actions
LOL!!!
But he would have to change his name again!!!..85 is taken…lol…
no its not...
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Hi imreallycool on Sep 29, 2009 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Kickers miss kicks. It sucks but it happens.
Rob Bironas missed TWO easy kicks in the season opener for the Titans, and that DEFINITELY cost them the game (they lost by 3, missing two FGs is a 6-pt swing). Still, although that sucks, the guy has the record for most FGs in a game (8) and has been money at other times when it counted. What are you gonna do?
Seems like Tynes is going through something, but he’s likely to work it out.
And with that said, the idea that you’re gonna find a better option on the “available kickers” market is just farfetched. The time to worry about this was in the Offseason—prior to camp. Now, you have what you have, and it’s the best you’re likely to find.
DannoE
"You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one."
This is how...
the Bears discovered Robbie Gould. He was a midseason pickup when their original kicker (I thikn it was Edinger?) got injured. He did so well that he took the job and ran with it and is still there 3 yrs later.
and is one of the best kickers in the NFL
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
What he's going thru
is missing a year, kicking during games is a groove thing.
Conan!, What is good in Football?!
Daa.... to run between the tackles,
To drive the linebackers before you,
And to hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders.
Mental
some guys just perform better under pressure. maybe he comes in thinks its a chip shot and approaches it as such and mentally makes some mistake. physically, there is no excuse for missing a 21 yd FG as a professional unless he was injured, bad snap, field was wet, all of which did not happen on these gimmies.
Under pressure in the NFC championship...
he was 1/3. That’s 33%. Yes he made his last one that won the game, but if he had made one of those first two attempts we’d have won in OT. Instead we almost lost in regulation!
For the record
he was 3/5. and i agree he should have made that 36 yd in regulation on the last drive. i had a few choice words at the time but he did come thru in OT and were there not any other plays in the game that put us in a position to have to rely on a FG and send it into OT? He has got to get the job done when called upon but no kicker is automatic.
Tynes is awfl
Ed…
In all honesty, the only thing Tynes has going for him is his career %, and the fact that he was the guy that kicked us into the SB. For that latter reason he’s ALWAYS going to hold a special place in the hearts of most Giants fans. Still, the fact that he has that on his resume, and we STILL don’t trust the guy says a lot. He’s an enigma to me b/c I think any other team would have dumped him last year. I mean what was the point of keeping both him and Carney??
Let me list of the bad about this guy:
1. He misseed two…yes TWO, EP’s during the superbowl year.
2. He nearly kicked us OUT of that Superbowl with his choke misses
3. If the snap is off in any way, even if Feagles (maybe one of the best holders in the game) gets the ball down perfectly, he can’t handle it and misses
4. His kickoffs SUCK. I don’t know where you ever saw him have a booming kickoff?? I don’t think he’s ever had a toucback in his Giants career.
5. He has AWFUL range. Tell me the last time you saw this guy kick an FG >50 yds?
6. The 2 cake misses this year.
I really don’t understand why the Giants are so married to this guy. Even that SB year, when most of us were clamoring for them to dump him (Im still not sure how he beat out Josh Huston that year) they wouldn’t budge. Seriously…what redeeming quality does this guy have as a kicker that makes him stick with this team?
Tynes
He has a booming kick this weekend in Tampa that resulted in a touchback…
And the Giants don’t ever attempt 50yd FGs mostly because we trust our defense and we play the field position game very well…
But the guy is hard for me to watch.. Still he is doing well for me in Fantasy lol
that's a good point
half the time we’d prefer to just bring out Feagles and pin them inside the 10 than risk missing a 50+ yard field goal and give them great field position
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
Tynes has gone from goat to hero..
But our blood pressure keeps rising every time he steps on the field..There are no other quality kickers out there, so we are all stuck with potential cardiac arrest..I have learned to just walk off and come back in and ask the wife if he made it..Even extra point kicks. They should have kept Carney…Who cares how old he is..He was automatic..His kick-offs were short, but never caused problems..That is why we have special teams play..and I don’t see alot of kickers these days that can boot it thru the end zone. Tynes is not going to keep going goat to hero forever..He is going to blow up a game..Hero to goat in a heartbeat shank.
Agree with you to an extent...
Tynes’s range is only marginally better than Carney’s and his kickoffs are about the same.
You think Carney ever
would have made a 47 yarder in Green bay on an absolutely FRIGID day? No freaking way.
Couldn't even make a 41 yarder..
In the Meadowlands.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions
don't forget
that carney choked against the eagles and the playoffs. we could have easily won that game if he didn’t miss those field goals
how sweet would it be
to have a kicker who was fairly solid from 55? A Jason Elam type?
I guess we’re just spoiled to be thinking about this. I betcha the Bucs, Rams, Skins, Lions, Chiefs aren’t thinking about their kickers…
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Sep 29, 2009 10:46 AM EDT reply actions
Don't kill me but,
Why are so many ready to dump Tynes when so many wanted to keep Tyree. To me, Tynes has been far more productive than Tyree. All the talk about he’s “going” to cost us a game. So many fortune tellers. Fact is, he hasn’t cost us a game. Maybe, he’s not “going” to miss any more this year. We don’t know. Tynes is the guy for the job. It’s Giants’ football. Nothing is ever going to be easy, not even field goals. To eliminate any Tynes headaches, just score TDs. What next? Do we look for another QB if Eli throws a pick 6 and we lose the game????
yea I don't understand it....
I mean Tyree aside from his TD’s and THE CATCH in the SB, was largely a ST’s player who was a horrible excuse for a slot WR.
Tynes is not a bad kicker. He shanks some, but he’s a good kicker for the Giants. They have to keep the games interesting you know….
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 29, 2009 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Tynes hasn't been that bad
Once he gets into a rhythm, He’ll be fine. Kicking is about rhythm more than anything so if he keeps missing these kicks, then it’s cause for concern.
President of the Ramses Barden Fan Club
by Hoyadestroya85 on Sep 29, 2009 11:04 AM EDT reply actions
This is really stupid...
We’re talking about a kicker here. He missed a 21 yarder, big deal. I saw that Cincy kicker miss an extra point to win a game last year. I said it before and I’ll say it again, Tynes hasn’t lost us a game, so until he does…lets cut him some slack.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 11:10 AM EDT reply actions
He misses chip-shots consistently...
I can understand missing a +40 kick but chip-shots each week?..He stinks…He pushes every kick left.
That would be true...
If it were true…but it ain’t.
He has a good track record, having made 100-of-125 kicks (80%) in his six-year career. Inside 30 yards, by the way, this season’s two misses give him just three (36-of-39) in his career.
So to say he misses chip shots consistently is just incorrect. Yes he’s missed two this season (one, the one that everyone is complaining about couldn’t have been anymore meaningless unless it was a preseason game) but he missed the entire season last year, give him some time to get reacquainted with the the game…because he did make not one, but two game winning field goals against Dallas…and that’s really all I give a damn about.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Ive said this in another post
but my gf is from N.O. and a big Saints fan. Now THEY had a kicking problem last year. Thats why they now have Carney. Tynes is fine. Most kickers go through a rough patch here and there. I’d love to have a “Vinateri” as much as the next guy, but honestly Tynes is probably about a league average kicker. You generally dont find better than average kickers on the FA market for obvious reasons. Stick with Tynes for now and hope for the best.
The only guy that interests me is Gano
I’m sick of picking up kickers off the trash bin – I’d prefer to go with a young guy who’s got a lot of leg and a lot of potential. I thought Gano was the best kicker in the NCAA last year, and I’m actually surprised 3 kickers were drafted ahead of him and he didn’t make a team. I’d be willing to give him a shot – otherwise, best to just stick with Tynes and hopes he sorts it all out.
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
Gano
I dont understand how this kid does not have a job..hes a punter and a kicker which he can do at a very high level. I would love it if the giants picked him up after the season or asap because he is a fantastic punter with great accuracy so after feagles is gone he can do that..and he kicks! WHO ELSE DOES THAT!
by Hi imreallycool on Sep 29, 2009 11:54 AM EDT reply actions
Tynes
is erratic with some of the FG but all around he is an above average kicker. I always think back to last season and the Kick Off situation which was horrendous, Carney was accuarate but his KO’s stunk so I am glad we have Tynes back for that.
Some one said it earlier we are going to have to learn to live with his ups and downs….
Tynes must go
Good post Ed and something that surely needs to be addressed. Both the Green Bay game and Dallas game you mentioned, when Tynes hit the winning FG should have been over before that. People forget we had to drive to win both of those games because Tynes missed FG’s earlier in the games. He put the G-Men in those situations to begin with.
So I do not applaud him for those FG’s. Yes we won the game but the game should have been over and he gives our opponents too many chances to win games. I don’t know who the replacement should be but he needs to get the hell out of town.
GO NY GIANTS!!
So it's fair to pin all the blame on Tynes for missing one field goal against Dallas...
But completely let the offense off the hook when they went 0/5 in the Red Zone??
I disagree.
Tynes kept us in that game. If he was as terrible as everyone is making him out to be, we wouldn’t have won either of the first two games with our offense going 0/8 in the Red Zone.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Tynes is horrible
We aren’t discussing the entire teams misfortunes inside the red zone. We are talking about Tynes here. Tynes is horrible. Again, a missed FG is a missed FG no matter what. That last drive against Dallas should not have even been happening if he makes the FG earlier. We would have been taking a knee.
And missing a 21 yard FG is just inexcusable. We are all Giants fans here and I hope we can share opinions without anyone getting insulted. I certainly won’t.
GO NY GIANTS!!
Tynes is not horrible.
If Tynes was horrible, he would have missed at least one of the two game winning field goals against Dallas, and we would be 2-1. You choose to discredit Tynes because
That last drive against Dallas should not have even been happening if he makes the FG earlier. We would have been taking a knee.
That’s your opinion. My opinion is that if our offense could score when inside the 20s (again they were 0/5 in the red zone at Dallas) than neither one of those field goals has any bearing on the outcome whatsoever, and we blow out Dallas instead of winning by two. The fact of the matter is the entire team worked together, and put us in a position to win the game with :04 seconds left.
The entire team did that..not just Tynes missing one field goal earlier in the game.
So what did Tynes do? He delivered. Twice. But instead of cheering for Tynes and calling him a hero for nailing both kicks, most people criticize him for “putting us in that position in the first place” as if the offenses anemic showing in the Red Zone had nothing to do with it.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions
My opinion?
It is a fact, just as the another close game with Dallas was. Tynes hits those earlier FG’s and the games were over.
It makes for good TV for the final drive to win the game but did you see Coach Coughlin’s reaction to the missed FG? He was completely bent over, almost dropping to his knees as if he were having a baby. Again, this conversation is about Tynes and not the red zone offense. Don’t get me wrong, obviously I am glad we won the games.
GO NY GIANTS!!
that is not fact.
Looking at the score, yea it is the difference.
But you can’t look at it like that cuz there’s probably a 100% chance there were a few breaks that could go the other way.
Shit happens and the only thing that mattes is the end of the game.
If Tynes goes and missed that last FG, then its his fault cuz his team got him in position.
The fact he’s kicking a FG in the first place means the defense won that series anyway.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 29, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Of course it is
How can you say that? Stick to the subject of Tynes kicking and it is 100% a fact. There is no other way to look at it.
GO NY GIANTS!!
ugh...
done arguing.
You don’t get it.
Yes, you look at the score, and IF he makes it, yea the score means the GW FG didn’t have to happen.
But if you go around and change the breaks of the game, there is not a single chance, that the game goes exactly the same if you go and change that FG.
It happened cuz it happened. The Giants won. That’s it.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 29, 2009 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions
It's 100% Fact
That our offense was putrid in the Red Zone. Zero scores in Five attempts. That’s a fact.
Another fact is that Tynes went 4/5 with a game winning field goal that day.
Those are the facts.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions
No arguing on my end
It is just a fact. I don’t want our G-Men to lose a game over this guys inconsistency. Not one single game.
GO NY GIANTS!!
So, would it be fair a coach
To publicly crticize a K because he missed two FG’s? At the same time he already kicked 4! He scored more than what his own offense could generate, and scored almost half of what his own defense gave up! Who’s accountable? Everyone is, but it’s too easy to single out a K!
Jim Mora Jr...
He’s a real jerk.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Romaine
what you’re not getting is that once you begin to get into “whatifs”:
What if Tynes hit the earlier field goal?
Well, what if Dallas returned the ensuing kickoff for a touchdown?
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Sep 29, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions
But you're trying to put all the blame as to why we were in that position in the first place on Tynes...
When that’s not the case. If the defense doesn’t give up 200+ rushing yards and give up 31 points, if the offense scores just ONE touchdown in five red zone attempts, if if if if…all that matters is we had a chance to win with :04 seconds left, and Tynes delivered two times out of two times, so he was really 5/6 on that day.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Magic Flying carpets
I could talk about those too here but this thread is about Tynes and not the offense or defense.
GO NY GIANTS!!
i love how
the majority of the people in here just say we have to cut him, completely disregarding the talent level available. what would be the point of cutting a guy just to get someone with equal or lesser value. and everyone is high on this gano guy. do you really want to rely on a rookie to kick a big field goal in the playoffs?
This season
I know we have to stick with Tynes this season and I am OK with that. If he is on the team next year I would be shocked is all I’m saying. I wish there were a suitable replacement available out there now.
GO NY GIANTS!!
not so prime tynes
Laurence Tynes drives me nuts too and lord knows I wish the Giants would get someone in here to compete with him in training camp. However after watching Jay Feely kick for us I learned a lesson. Feely was pretty much automatic and never missed chip shots and was preety good over 40 yards, however when the pressure was on Feely would choke, just like Carney did last year in the playoffs. Tynes is mentally tough even if he misses a field goal or two… when we need him most he comes through anybody think Feely makes that kick in Green Bay to send us to the SB? This season we are stuck with Tynes, let’s hope Jerry brings or drafts a kicker and Tynes has to compete for his roster spot!!!!
by Late for Dinner on Sep 29, 2009 12:20 PM EDT reply actions
Again...
Tynes missed FG earlier in the GB game is why we needed the points to win that game. I won’t show him love because of that, the game should have been over and we should have been taking a knee or running out the clock at that point.
GO NY GIANTS!!
He is also the only kicker in NFL history..
To hit a 40+ yard field goal at Lambeau in December.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Big Deal
Again, he wouldn’t have had to make that dramatic kick if he did his job earlier in the game.
GO NY GIANTS!!
RE: Again
Believe me I understand what your talking about in the GB game, there is a whole in my wall to prove it. But think back to the Seattle game in (i think it was 06) when Feely missed a couple of kicks early that he should have made. Feely psyched himself out of the game and could not kick anything and kept missing we lost the game. I give Tynes credit for getting his head into the game and nailing a 40+ field goal in Lambeau. I know Feely would have missed that. My point is Tynes does drive you crazy but he does come though in the clutch so right now I don’t think it’s a good idea to just dump him for an unknown.
by Late for Dinner on Sep 29, 2009 12:39 PM EDT reply actions
This year
We are stuck with Tynes for this year. All it will take for him to get cut is him losing a game for the G-men over a missed FG. I think that would be the last straw for Coach. Kicker is area that will almost certainly be addressed next season though, in my opinion.
GO NY GIANTS!!
Tynes is not a bad kicker.
Id rather not even know the kickers name and simply score TD’s, but that’s me.
It doesn’t matter that his clutch kicks may or may not be because he shanked one earlier. That is a really stupid idea to say “Oh, if he made that one before…this game wouldn’t come down to this”.
No, if you say “if” all the time….those plays earlier in the game may go the other way, there may be a missed tackle..all the sort of crap that can turn an NFL game, even if he makes that kick earlier in the game.
The score says its the difference, but if you go back and change the game, there’s gonna be other stuff that could be changed the other game.
Tynes is the Giants kicker. Live with it. He hasn’t cost a game yet, so “IF”….. my Uncle had tits, he’d be my Aunt.
What the f$%k is the internet?
No if's, and's or but's about it
Tynes hit those FG’s and the games were OVER. Say hi to your Aunt for me lol.
GO NY GIANTS!!
Well you're the one saying If.
“IF” Tynes hit that FG.
There’s no way the game goes the same if he DOES hit the FG in teh middle of the game.
Not the way to think.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 29, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
LOL!!!
but there is no definite way that if Tynes definitely hits that FG that the rest of the game definitely goes the same way.
You change that, something else has to give.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 29, 2009 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Not at all
The only difference is the game ends sooner and with a less dramatic ending.
GO NY GIANTS!!
well if you're only talking about
THIS game then, yea, its his fault the game went to OT.
But Im not talking about that one single game.
When a kicker misses, like he did in thethe Cowboys game in the middle of the game, that doesn’t mean that if he makes it that the team would be kneeling at the end of the game if he made it.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 29, 2009 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
All kickers miss FG's
I am not being unreasonable about this. I understand that kickers won’t make all of their FG’s. I’m just sick of Tynes missing FG’s in close games then being called a “hero” when he corrects the mistake, that put us there in the first place.
I just want to be able to watch Big Blue line up for a FG without feeling like I’m going to throw up or cringing when the ball is snapped.
GO NY GIANTS!!
well that's what I'm saying...
its not Tynes fault the team is in that place 98% of the time he’s been a hero in a game.
If the offense didn’t get stopped on 3rd down, or the defense let up the tying FG/TD in the first place, then what?
The FG kicker to me is never the hero anyway. He did nothing to bring them down there……..
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 29, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Jeez Romaine,
what is it that you don’t get about alternate realities? You can’t simply substitute one outcome for another and then also infer that all subsequent actions would be identical. You can’t graft one outcome into a distinct chain of events. It doesn’t work that way. Everything that happens changes the game’s course and outcome. 3 points at the end is not a substitute for three points earlier in the game. It’s a totally different situation. What IF he gets three early and isn’t on the field late as the Giants lose by ten?
Listen, I hate our kicking game, but you left logic in the locker room.
Try to grab this: The chances of tomorrow’s 4-digit lottery drawing being the same as today’s are 1 in 10,000
The chances of it being ANY SPECIFIC predetermined number are ALSO 1 in 10,000, therefore it’s not really odd if it WAS the same number twice in a row because they have no bearing on each other.
Here’s an IF for you …
If you stop pressing your point at least 3 other people will save themselves a lot of keystrokes.
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Sep 29, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions
speaking of TD's
Instead of talking about Tynes, can we talk about Gilbride’s Red Zone play calling! His predictable conservative play calling is what is hurting us right now in my humble opinion.
by Late for Dinner on Sep 29, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions
it was pretty good against the Bucs.
3RZ TD’s.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 29, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
It was okay
Let’s not forget if Gillbride should have had 2 more TD’s in fact Tynes 2 Qtr miss should have been a TD not a field goal attempt. Just feel like that is going to bite us in the you know what more than Tynes.
by Late for Dinner on Sep 29, 2009 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd be happy to
But this post is about Tynes kicking and not the red zone offense. Every Giants knows that is an area that needs improvement and I completely agree with you about that. I did however think OC KG’s play calling was much better against TB this past Sunday.
GO NY GIANTS!!
Well...
It was Tampa Bay…hopefully we can keep it up against someone that doesn’t have a worse record than Detroit haha
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions
KC
I agree and with KC up next, I like our chances on going 4-0.
If Tynes can make all of his chippy FG"s that is lol I’m just kidding but I’m serious.
GO NY GIANTS!!
Haha hopefully he won't be leaned on so heavily...
Because the offense will be punching it in when they get inside the 20s!
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions
But if it comes down to a kick....this is our guy.

"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions
Dude!
I’d love to have Strahan back kicking! Right through the gap uprights!
HAHA!
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
Tynes is running from the team...
Who are trying to kill him and bury him right there ion the field!!
GO NY GIANTS!!
you could also argue
that if we won the coin toss against green bay, favre wouldn’t have thrown that pick and we would have lost. so just cuz he misses an early field goal doesn’t automatically mean everything else would have been the same. the other team could play more agressively and score a TD to make up for the deficit
Wow, what a thread
about a kicker. Maybe we should just agree on Chaos Theory and move on. Yeah, maybe if Tynes makes FGs earlier in games, it would increase the odds the Giants would not have to put together a game winning drive at the end. Maybe the opposition throws the ball more often instead and wins by 10 points; however, I think it’s obvious having a team with a kicker that is not consistent inside 30 yards changes game planning and makes it easier for a team to keep the score close. Finding a kicker who is would be impossible midseason.
Lol, thats what i was thinking
A K thread getting this much chatter. I guess theres not much more to chat about? The offense is clicking, the red-zone improved, the D had a shutout and were 3-0!
All of this over a chip-shot! lol
You are all right..
But The reason we are having this friendly fan debate is because we have a very inconsistent Kicker. If we had a good one we wouldn’t be wasting our time debating the issue. Hopefully he lives up to his potential..He is our kicker, there are no other options at the moment, we are stuck with him..He said he learned from Carney…What is it he says he learned?..We need a good kicker..they don’t have one you can trust yeah, he won the Dallas game after a nice practice shot that almost went left..You don’t often get practice kicks in a game.
The what if game is dangerous
What if he had made that one against Dallas? Dallas is down by 4 instead of 1 late… so they do not go conservative, and instead go for (and make) a Touchdown, which runs the clock down an extra 60 seconds. This means Eli dopes not have the time to drive up the field, has to force it, gets picked, and game ends with Giants fan grumbling about how Eli let us down.
Playing the what if game is pointless, and despite my own predisposition towards that during a game thread, looking back in 20/20 hindsight achieves nothing in this regard. The chances of the game going the same way from that point is not possible (due to the situational nature of Football and sports in general), so any argument made under what if is not credible.
FYI, same thing applies to the NFC Championship game in 2007, had me made one of those the 6 point gap makes Green bay play quite differently, and the game likely ends (one way or the other) in regulation.
Very simple
Irrespective of what TC says publicly, every team is always looking at every position and looking to see how they can improve.
Are the Giants working out anyone this week? No, that simply means that they have looked over the field, and don’t see an upgrade.
OTOH – I have no doubt that JR has the phone number for every available kicker sitting on his desk
Tynes Must Go
Carl had it right when he referred to Tynes as “Loser Tyme”. He is not good enough to have his name spelled or pronounced correctly.
When you have a team that struggles in the Turquoise Zone, having a reliable kicking is vital. Tynes is in no way a reliable kicker. I don’t what he has on Coughlin but whatever it is it has to be really bad.
Fire Girardi! Paul O'Neill for manager!
I have yet
to shoot myself or anyone else with my gun, therefore all my bullet must be non-lethal…
…or, I have seen other evidence that leads me to believe my bullets are just as lethal as the bullets everyone else uses.
Just because your kicker hasn’t killed your team yet, doesn’t mean it can’t happen. Apparently, everyone is waiting to be shot before they’ll admit it’s a problem.
Once again, point taken
Now tell me, who is this great kicker we bring in to solve all of our field goal problems and if he’s so great and perfect, why isn’t he on an NFL roster already.
If we're gonna get someone...
I would hope he has a history of making game winning field goals, and has made at least 80% of his kicks over the course of his career.
Oh wait…
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't believe Tynes
should be cut midseason. I hope Jerry seriously takes another look at alternative solutions in the next offseason. I believe he probably did so this past off season, but decided Tynes was still the best value option available.
I think arguing Tynes isn’t a liability simply because he hasn’t missed an important game winning kick YET is a logical fallacy. Someone mentioned Gostkowski on New England; however, it was the lack of faith in Gostkowski that caused Belichick to go for an unsuccesful 4th down conversion in the Super Bowl. It was this game plan decision that changed the course of the game in our favor. This is the potential influence Tynes will have without ever having to swing his leg, because he has proven to be unreliable inside 30 yards.
by rzor on Sep 29, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Diasagree.
Inside 30 yards, by the way, this season’s two misses give him just three (36-of-39) in his career.
How exactly does that equate to being unreliable inside 30 yards? I’d say 92% is pretty damn reliable. I mean if Peyton Manning has two games where he throws 3 INTS I’m not gonna go ahead and say Peyton Manning is prone to throwing interceptions. Just take into consideration he missed the entire season last year, and he may need a couple games to get back in gear.
Before those two misses, he’s been nothing other than automatic. Let him get back into his groove, and he’ll more than likely continue that trend.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, now we're getting into
the definition of reliable. The measurement for reliability from a quarterback is different from what is measured for a kicker. 92% would be insane for passing accuracy, so we can’t really compare apples to apples there. When a kicker lines up for a attempt inside 30 yards most football fans think “This is pretty automatic.” means the kicker is reliable, barring weirdness (e.g. Romo dropping the ball). When Tynes lines up for his next kick in that range, none of us will think it’s automatic, because we know it’s not. To some, that means he’s no longer reliable inside 30 yards.
Which is exactly why I'm saying...
Let him get into his rhythm. He missed all of last season, so he’s bound to be a little off early on. But prior to this season, as clearly indicated by the statistics offered by Ed in this post, he’s been automatic from inside 30.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 29, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions
he has Fire Girarid and hire Paul frickin O'Neil in his sig.
How the hell can you take him seriously?
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 29, 2009 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions
Belickick and 4th down
it was the lack of faith in Gostkowski that caused Belichick to go for an unsuccesful 4th down conversion in the Super Bowl.
Belichick just went for (and picked up) a 4th and 1 on his own 24 yard line. He plays by his own rules. I don’t think Bells didn’t have faith in his kicker, sometimes, he just has no respect for the opposing team.
I hate continuing
the “IF” arguments, but this is a fun one because the Pats lost. If Vinitieri had still been on the roster, would he have attempted the 49 yarder, or still have gone for it on 4th and 13? If they had kicked and made it, they Pats would have been up 10 – 3 in the third quarter. Would the game have played out much differently from there? Who knows, but I believe Belichick made the decision to go for a high risk 4th and 13 was influenced by his lack of faith in a young kicker versus a proven commodity. This is an interesting question because it’s not “Well if so and so had cought the ball…” but instead this is a controlled decision that impacted the flow of the game, like Zorn accepting the penalty against the Lions this past weekend.
Belichick..can't stand kickers..No coach does actually like them..and
And that Adam Viniatra (spelling suspect)..Go back to a few years ago when he was interviewed in his Canadian hometown and listen to what Peyton had to say in response to that jerk saying he could have won the game..it was a playoff game. Peyton blasted his arse. The kickers are paid to nail points when needed to do so..They stand around and kick at a net all game long, and guys like Tynes miss them when it counts. The last two games would have been over if he did what he is paid for early on.
There are a lot of good points
The day will come when Tynes loses an important game for the Giants. It feels like it is just a matter of time. Until that day, hopefully we can continue winning games on the strength of our offense and dominance of our defense.
Next year, Tynes should be gone from the team in my opinion. Those are crucial points to any close game he misses. I know it doesn’t count but can anyone tell me how many he also missed in preseason? Was it 2 or 3 or 4?
Did you hear Goose say and I quote “Tynes was missing kicks in pre game warmups from the left and the right and everywhere.”
GO NY GIANTS!!
So our biggest question mark is our K?
There are worse problems to have. We can avoid this issue all together by scoring TDs, which I have a feeling we’re going to be doing a lot more of.
Now, I’m a realist. Of course I want a more reliable option at K. But the simple truth is that there simply isn’t one out there. Every single K we could have a chance at grabbing has as many question marks as Tynes. So for now, I’m content enough to stick w/ him until a clear-cut better option is available.
This fancy term "green zone"...
We have stunk..and have fully brought that term back to “red zone”..but that means we need a kicker to make a “pop-warner” field goal.
Field position seems to be a factor with missed kicks
is it just me or doesn’t it seem that Mr. Tynes misses FG kicks from the hashmarks and not from the middle of the field. He should make these short hashmark kicks but he’s kicking it mostly straight and outside the posts. I see this all the way back to the Super Bowl season with Tynes. When he misses and had the distance, the ball was on the hashmarks.
Now if Don Shula [who was famous for kicking a FG on 3rd down in case there was a bad snap] was our coach he’d get the ball more towards the middle of the field in a critical and controllable FG situation to give his kicker a margin of error on the right and the left side of straight ahead. With Tom Coughlin I don’t see him making that adjustment that would favor any and all kickers and give the Giants their best chances to get points.
Vinatieri
To pick a name that people have been discussing a lot: If you look at Vinatieri, he’s made 124 out of 129 for his career from the 20-29 range. Tynes is 36 for 39. So it’s not like Vinatieri never misses from under 30 yards. He’s at 96%, while Tynes is 92%.
Looking at their career stats, a kicker makes about 10 attempts per season between 20-29 yards on average.
There’s difference of 4%, so about 4 more kicks missed in that range over the course of 10 seasons. That doesn’t seem like much of a difference to me.
Good stuff
What makes it bad for Tynes right now is that he has missed two straight from that range.
by Ed Valentine on Sep 29, 2009 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions
bottom line is that
missing kicks inside of 30 yards as an NFL kicker in inexcusable regardless of the game situation, weather, or other circumstances.
excuse the language, but i don’t give a shit if a kicker can hit from 55. if he can’t consistently hit 99% of the time from 20-29 yards then he’s worthless.
Tynes has missed two kicks inside of 30 yards in three games this season. if he misses another, then they’re going to have to start looking for other options.
by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Sep 29, 2009 7:03 PM EDT reply actions
Who?
Who’s our new kicker if Tynes misses again? And why isn’t he already here?
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 30, 2009 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Mad as hell
I know how I feel when the offense drives 80 yards down field
In a close game, the kicker come in and misses. I can imagine
the impact that has on the minds of the players on both sides.
If by odd chance, the KC game comes down to 4 seconds to go and Giants trail by two points – and Tynes missed the kick..
Would you blame the loss on Tynes ? Or blame the rest of the team for not putting away a lesser opponent earlier ?
I would blame them all
But he gets paid to make those kicks..Alot more money than you or I will ever see..If it comes down to 4 seconds or 2 seconds..He needs to do his job..How long would you and I or anyone have a job if we didn’t do it?
not a problem yet...
As this is my first post, I’ll hope to not be too stupid with it. I don’t think Tynes is the optimum, but there’s no obvious easy upgrade that’s immediately available. Also, while Tynes has lost the confidence of many fans, the important thing is he doesn’t appear to have lost the confidence of either his teammates or the coaching staff. If you think about it, the drive in Dallas was designed (after his first chippy miss) to set up the field goal attempt (on which he delivered…..twice). The miss this weekend at Tampa Bay was irritating to be sure, but it really wasn’t close to being a factor in the game. If given long enough, Tynes, or any other kicker, will eventually miss a kick that will be said to cost a ballgame. However, given his career stats, the fact he’s signed, and the lack of an immediate available upgrade, I think we’re in pretty good position to be griping about a guy who will appear on the field less than a dozen times a game than fans of certain other clubs who have to wince every time their QB lines up at center. If Tynes keeps missing chip shots, I suspect management will give the matter immediate attention, but unless that trend does continue, I think we’re looking at regression to the mean careerwise, rather than a lack of ability.
Welcome aboard Cranky..
I agree with alot of your points..I’m just worried about my back..leaning/jerking it to the right during every kick he attempts..Like I said earlier, I just walk out of the room, come back in and ask the wife if he made it..That includes extra points.
Totally - Tynes is NOT a good kicker!!
Hi -
I wrote about this last week in my blog too!!! I truly miss Carney – he was awesome last year. It seems that Coughlin forgot that 2 years ago, Tynes was just as inconsistent.
A kicker can make all of the difference in a game!!
Let’s start a petition to get rid of Tynes!
Are you talking about the
same Carney that went 3 for 5 against Philly in the playoff loss last year. The guy missed 2 field goals in a Playoff game and his longest make was 36 yards. Yes, by all means, let’s get Carney back in uniform. Compare that with Tynes’ misses and makes at Lambeau field and you might want to change your mind.
+1
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 30, 2009 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions
that's brilliant
Coughlin often makes roster decisions based on petitions
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Sep 30, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Kicker issues
Guys for starters we are pretty lucky to complain about the kicker being our issue. But I really don’t see one. Receivers drop balls, running backs fumble, QBs throw picks, defensive players blow assignments or miss tackles…point is no one is perfect Tynes is going to miss from time to time. Are we going to turn our back on Eli if he has a bad game? We might not be happy but then you remember 07 and the sting of a certain loss isn’t so bad.
Right
Tynes has never actually cost the Giants anything, and we are very lucky if this is our major issue. There really isn’t a beter option right now that sticking with the guy, I think. He just makes you crazy — you know he can do it, he just messes up the weirdest things.
by Ed Valentine on Sep 29, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions
We need a back-up to Tynes
Listen – I agree that we’re fortunate to be talking about kicker issues.. but I also believe that Tynes will cost a game or two and hopefully in won’t be in the playoffs (in 2007, against Greenbay it took him 3 tries!!).
I would like an insurance policy – special teams play is critical just like offense and defense.
Also, in any other position, if a player messes up, he can get benched and someone else will start.. so why is that not the case here?
Vito
You folks are alot of fun to blog with!!!..Even If we are debating a kicker..I truly enjoy
All of your opinions..food for thought I say…“Old Giants Fan Bob”…lol
Misses
As long as he makes the ones that count in the postseason, I could care less how many he misses in the regular season.
kickers
are Matt Bahr or, Ali Hadji-Sheik still available on the free agent market? Bahr, was My favorite GIANTS kicker because He wasn’t afraid to make a tackle. oh yeah, He was a pretty good kicker too.
no way
lol the sheik!! bring back the sheik! I haven’t heard that name in a long time.
GO NY GIANTS!!
Gotta love these fans...
That wanna get rid of everyone after a couple off days.
I don’t know how Eli ever survived the way half you numskulls act.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 1, 2009 11:02 AM EDT reply actions
Tynes
You have to keep in mind that Tynes is best when there are environemntal conditions that are tricky at best. Going into a playoff with home field advantage, I would want Tynes on the Roster, on the sideline, warming up…. I think running a few 4th and short plays would be good for the team experience anyway. If kickers were perfect, we would not need an offense and the game would be really boring.
Giants should be happy KC dumped Carney and Tynes so they could draft Medlock and cut him too ) Then they cut Feeley and Cundiff and drafted Barth. Then they cut Barth. Then they drafted Mr Irrelevant Ryan Succop. Would you really rather cut a kicker every time he misses and go through 8 kickers in 3 years like the Chiefs just did ?

by 





















