The Death of the Screen Pass (Open Letter to Kevin Gilbride)
Dear Kevin:
Congrats on the big road win despite your best efforts to thwart it. I have one question for you: why didn't we see single screen pass until the 4th and only then did we see two pathetic attempts at this?
I ask because I'm a lifelong Giants fan, and I have a vivid memory of watching Tiki Barber run this play to perfection. Tiki, you may remember, was a one-man show for the Giants, and the offense's bread-and-butter play was the screen pass. It worked really, really well.
As I'm sure you know, when the D sends a big blitz (as the Cowboys did over and over last night), an appropriately timed screen pass can be an absolute back-breaker for a D. If you can time it right, it's a great, great play. Agreed? With the Giants smaller O-linemen, they have the perfect personnel to execute this play. And last night, with the pressure that the 'Boys were bringing, I cannot for the life of me figure out why this was not once called.
I think you ran two plays that closely resembled a screen: one was a quick dart to Bradshaw (without any attempt to suck the D in - so that can't really be considered a screen) and the other was a nicely executed set-up to Boss in the 4th where Kevin B just couldn't shake the tackler (he had an easy first down if he gets past the first guy). But I just can't figure it out. You have the personnel, right? (eg. Bradshaw in the Tiki role, with his speed and moves in the open field is an absolute terror.)
And one more question, the swing to hedgecock was.....mystifying. Nothing else, other than I really have no clue WTF you were thinking there.
PS: 0-8 in the red zone is simply not going to cut it this year.
FanPosts are written by community members. This is simply a way for community members to express opinions too long to be contained in a comment.
0 recs |
26 comments
Comments
Most of this is dribble.....
Its starting to get old, blaming Gilbride, cuz should he so happen to call the dumbest play in history (like say a pitch to the outside on 3rd and goal from the 25 yard line) and it goes in for a TD, he’s a genius right?
I like the idea of the screen pass, but you mention Tiki. Well, Tiki’s a borderline HOF RB, one of the best pass catching RB’s in the game during his time. The Giants don’t have Tiki anymore now do they Cody?
And what the hell was the problem with the offense last night?
I like the idea of the screen, maybe put 2 and 2 together and do a screen in the red zone!
The Giants didn’t win in spite of Gilbride. THe players carry out the plays, no matter how good they are. Failed execution, good defense and just plain bad luck, all play a part. Its not 100% on the frickin guy calling the plays.
The screen pass is an art, not an easy play to run. There’s a reason that Bradshaw has not been freed a lot, its cuz he’s in Coughlin’s doghouse a lot more than likely cuz he can’t run a screen pass in practice.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 21, 2009 3:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with you Bradshaw...
However he did call another toss to Ahmad in the red zone on third down that lost yardage (again)…that play call really got me worked up, had to smoke some illegals after to get my mind right.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 21, 2009 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Regrding the personnel executing the plays, you make a great point
And I happen to agree with you there. Pass protection kept Eli from getting sacked, but he was pressured all night long.
Now, your point on Tiki Barber: I completely agree that Tiki was very talented. We are in 100% agreement there. And yes, obviously he is no longer a member of the almighty Gmen. However: Tiki shared a few traits with your namesake, did he not? Specifically: great moves in the open field and speed. Why not put him in a position to take advantage of that?
by Cody K on Sep 21, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
cuz Tiki was well...
Tiki.
Brian Westbrook is a good comparison, very simialar.
I really want Bradshaw to run the screen. I think the team wants to use him too, but there is something there that they aren’t comfortable with that they don’t run it.
THey ran it plenty with D-Ward too last year, maybe they run it with Ware when he comes back?
There’s an art to the screen pass. Tiki ran it to perfection (tho Kerry Collins and his boneheadedness screwed it up at times….Eli too when he was a young goof)
Who knows, but there is something that we all don’t know that they don’t do it.
They did run a nice screen with Boss, but there was holding……
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 21, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I happen to agree with you 100%....
dallas defense was vulnerable to the screen pass…
they were bringing a lot of pressure and bradshaw is more than capable of catching those passes and turning up field.
I don’t want to criticize the coaches after a win but we certainly asked a lot of eli and his WR’s last night.
I think you make a very good point.
but like FreeBradshaw pointed out…some of that is execution.
i think the giants looked so bad on that “attempted” screen pass to bradshaw in the first half that they just went away from it after that.
Still…i’d like to see more of it.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
by andiamo708 on Sep 21, 2009 3:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
One more point -
I know that Giants fans are sort of separated into two camps: those that do not want to heap criticism on Gilbride and those that do.
However, I just want to point out some specific things we have all seen work in the past. I’m not trying to sit here and merely say, “Gilbride’s a bum!!” without saying that there are things that could be different. Instead, I’m thinking about something that would seem to work (HAS WORKED!) with the personnel in place.
But come on…the red zone issues are frightening. I think we can all agree on that. We all heard even Collinsworth and Michaels point that out last night.
by Cody K on Sep 21, 2009 3:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
OK..
it made it seem like a KILLDRIVE thread, but I see what you mean.
The Red Zone issues is one that everyone knows has been a problem. Its not like Plaxico was the answer either, cuz they pulled the same crap much of 2007 and 08 too.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 21, 2009 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why would the Giants use screens
when the Cowboys front is athletic and fast. Did Anyone notice Jay Ratliff running down Mario Manningham on a WR screen? We’ve seen the Giants not execute screen well so why use them against a team with big and fast linemen?
Also the Giants max protected all night so blitzes weren’t getting through and the team clearly had faith in Manningham and Smith to get open single covered. There is no reason to throw short when you can make plays down field all game.
by Major on Sep 21, 2009 3:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it was Bradshaw.
and it was a slow developing play….that said, you’re right. Screen’s weren’t needed cuz they Pies didn’t get much pressure. The guys on the edges were doing their jobs.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 21, 2009 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Manningham.
1st play of the game winning drive after the penalty
by Major on Sep 21, 2009 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I saw #44....
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 21, 2009 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm no Gilbride fan...
…but how is anybody disappointed with the passing game last night? Eli was brilliant, and WRs were running free in the Dallas secondary.
As for neutralizing their blitzes with screens, Eli was barely touched all night.
I do think the screen will be a factor in other games, but its absence wasn’t a negative last night.
And now I have to shower after having defended Kevin Gilbride.
by New York Sports Jerk on Sep 21, 2009 3:49 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Cody, C'mon man
There have been several screen passes in each of the first two games. A bunch to the wide receivers, which the Giants haven’t done much before. One to Bradshaw last night. One to Boss that was called back by penalty.
Oh, and stuff like the throw to Hedgecock. Sometimes you have to adjust and throw the ball to a secondary option.
Jeepers. I have to give you a big ‘Wet Willie’ if all you can do after last night is find reasons to criticize Gilbride.
by Ed Valentine on Sep 21, 2009 4:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jeepers...
I haven’t seen an episode of Scooby Doo in far too long.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 21, 2009 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
something that should be considered...
the attempted screen pass to AB yesterday looked awful…
and this is why i bring up “execution”…not just KG’s play calling.
Last night was also tough to call screen passes because again the play by the dallas front was pretty solid and they were getting out and playing pass protection…not to mention Manningham and Smith were lighting it up.
still, i think when you have an explosive player like brashsaw on the field you gotta find ways to get the ball in his hands.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
by andiamo708 on Sep 21, 2009 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well hang on a second....
I saw some amazing things out there: Tynes’ clutch kicking, young WR’s maturing into solid performers, etc. And a few things in particular:
I actually thought Eli played exceptionally well; his stat line was incredible – especially considering the relentless pass rush he faced the whole game. He didn’t make any glaring mistakes, he made some absolutely BEAUTIFUL throws, and he didn’t take a single sack (kudos to the OLine for keeping him clean as well).
And the d-backs played their hearts out. With their collective back to the wall (considering injury issues) I was blown away by how well they played as a unit. Phillips is a stud and is obviously the next best “U” safety.
So it’s not that I’m sitting here doom and glom about this team. In reality, I see so much great stuff out of this team. I’m frequently blown away by their depth, and by Reese’s ability to mine the NCAA and NFL ranks for great players.
But sometimes I really see fault in the coaching tendencies. I was the first to criticize Coughlin a few years ago and now I think the guy can do no wrong. I’m a passionate fan – just like all of you.
However, there is simply no denying that where we stand right now, two weeks in to the 2009 season, this team is still plagued by some of the same offensive issues that really hampered them last season. It’s frustrating for me to watch sometimes – and I can only draw on things that I’ve seen work in the recent past as a point of comparison.
by Cody K on Sep 21, 2009 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gilbride
We did have some Red Zone failures, but we still put up 33 points. Some of that was the Defense in fact more of it should have been but I really liked his aggressive style. Now if Smith or Hammy hadn’t been up to the challenge we would have had trouble. It’s always good to have room for improvement. Going into our so called “soft” part of the schedule with our next 3 being @TB, @KC, OAK we likely are looking at a 5-0 start but we need to focus on the little things in practice…ie Red Zone.
I’ll give the Run D a bye this week with the amount of injuries, but only because of the work CWeb and KP did all night on the Dallas receivers.
by wangstu13 on Sep 21, 2009 4:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tiki
You say this like Tiki was a bonified touchdown scrorer? I’m a lifelong Giants fan and borderline Tiki Hater so this oppinion is skewed. Tiki was very good at breaking screens getting caught at the 8 yard line and being pathetic in the red zone. Tiki never was a touchdown scorer, and it will probably keep him out of the hall.
by BravesfaninMontana on Sep 21, 2009 5:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
well that's hate...
look at Tiki’s numbers, he had years of 11, 13 and 9 rushing TD’s. A few receiving TD’s in each.
The only thing keeping Tiki out of the hall is the fact he didn’t play longer.
I always thought that he just didn’t have that extra break away gear that you’d think a guy like him would have, but that’s not why he didn’t score TD’s. That was cuz he wasn’t used in the red zone, they decided to have the situational Ron Dayne down there (ugh…)
Bonafide TD scorer? No, he’s not a Tomlinson in his prime, Emmit or Faulk (as well as other greats that I never saw..)
But…wait, I was only talking about screen passes anyway. Where the hell did Tiki scoring TD’s come from?
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 21, 2009 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Everyone loves Tiki
Here’s his splits against Marshall Faulk. I know it’s not an entirely fair comparison, but they were the same type backs with similar lenghth careers with a “goal line back” for a couple of years stealing opportunities.
Tiki 360 redzone touches 52 tds
Marshall Faulk 567 redzone touches 120 tds
We didn’t have a lot of trouble moving the ball last night. Getting in the endzone however is the problem. If you weren’t implying that a screen pass would get us into the endzone what was the point of the post. 400 plus yards of offense? Maybe a couple screen passes may have got us over 500?
by BravesfaninMontana on Sep 21, 2009 6:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's not dwell on one play or lack of same -
because it is bigger than screen plays, it is the entire approach Gilbride brings to a game. I submit he as the OC is so enamored of our DEFENSE and their ability to stop the other team that he is willing to settle for FGs rather than force the issue and play a more imaginative offense in the red zone. And let’s stop this “Green Zone” nonsense right now; that’s Coughlin’s and Gilbride’s DENIAL on display when they won’t even use the WORD!!! And all the talk of execution… the other team spends the entire week practicing to stop what we do. And because we are so predictable on offense those defenses will win on some plays, some series, some games. What Gilbride is most guilty of is his inabiilty to adapt, to change from opponent to opponent, from week to week. Yes, Eli provided both Manningham and Smith (to a lesser extent cause we knew what Stevie could do) with a coming-out party and that was nice. But…We never see, inside the ten or closer, the tight end hold for a count and then release and catch the ball completely unattended in the end zone. For years I’ve watched every team in football do this. Not us under Gilbride. We have a weapon in Bradshaw who seems quite healthy now. Why don’t we ever see what the other defense’s Antonio Pierce would look like having to guard Ahmad out of the backfield? Under Gilbride, we never will. In the natural world this inability to adapt would lead to his extinction. In the world of the Giants he somehow not only survives but thrives.
by nybaseballgiants on Sep 21, 2009 8:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Not my words...
From vacchianos blue screen:
• Not to put a damper on the excitement, but the Giants’ 0-for-5 performance in the red zone (0 for 8, now, on the season) nearly cost them this game. They’ve got to figure out a way to move the ball and score down there. I thought they were going to get creative early when rookie TE Travis Beckum was on the field for their first trip inside the red zone. But Kevin Gilbride’s plays were predictable. And, come on: Dusting off a red-zone swing pass to FB Madison Hedgecock instead of running a fade to 6-6 rookie Ramses Barden? I know Barden isn’t ready for a big role, but would it really be difficult to line him up in the slot and say "Run a fade to the back corner … then use your 7-foot-plus reach to catch the damn ball"?
by Cody K on Sep 22, 2009 1:04 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Gilly
From one of Gilbride’s biggest detractors:
The first two games have had good results on offense.
Yes, there needs to be progress on the red zone issue because the Giants must become excellent in all facets of the game.
p.s. Tiki = no ring
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Sep 22, 2009 7:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No screen, no problem
Yes, the screen is a counter to an aggressive defense, but if your max protecting and you have two WR’s catching 10 apiece, why stray from it?
For the red zone? Seeing how the Giants can move the ball anywhere else on the field, perhaps KG has no plays for this area? lol Afterall, you do run out of field!
by Hootman on Sep 22, 2009 10:18 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
just remember...
Gilbride presumably all those pass plays, too, that were so successful, as well as the overall approach that kept Eli upright the whole game. I have a lot of confidence they will figure out the red zone thing.
by hopeforthefuture3 on Sep 22, 2009 1:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















