Examining the New York Giants green zone issues
If you are talking about traffic signals green means 'go' and 'red' means 'stop.' That has to be why New York Giants coach Tom Coughlin calls that area inside the opponent's 20-yard line the green zone. Everyone else, of course, calls it the red zone.
The Giants offense seems confused by this whole concept. Maybe the players have forgotten the traffic laws. Maybe they are color blind. Maybe ... ah, maybe ... ah, whatever. Point is, the Giants offense has not done a good job the past couple of seasons taking full advantage of scoring opportunities.
Ernie Palladino has the numbers, pointing out that that the Giants were just 35-of-69 (51%) in green zone situations last season. You know it's an issue. I know it. The coaches know it. The players know it.
"We have to put the ball in the end zone when it is fourth and one. We have to convert the two third and one's," said coach Tom Coughlin (full transcript). "Anytime you are 0-3 in the green zone, obviously you need to get touchdowns instead of field goals. And so we continue to make that a matter of emphasis."
Quarterback Eli Manning summed up the problem this way.
"It is not really a green zone or red zone problem, it is a third and short problem," he said.
So, what is the problem here? The Giants have a 270-pound running back, one of the game's best offensive lines and a terrific blocking fullback. You would think they would be able to jam the ball down an opposing defense's throat and get a yard when they need one.
"We just assume that on third and short we are going to be able to run and be able to get it," said Manning.
Problem with that, to me, is that as good as the Giants offensive line is it is not a power, straight-ahead line. It excels at pulling and working in space, which is not typically the way short-yardage plays are blocked. Also, Brandon Jacobs is not exactly shifty in terms of squeezing into a small crack.
What can be done?
So, I'm not a football coach and Coughlin and offensive coordinator Kevin Gilbride know more about this than I do. Here, though, are five suggestions for how the Giants can try to improve this situation.
1. Pass the ball more
From Tom Rock of Newsday, who is rapidly challenging Mike Garafolo and Ralph Vacchiano for the title of my favorite Giants beat writer, comes the play-by-play of the Giants three trips into the green zone against the Redskins.
First Drive
First-and-10 from the 20 -- Pass to Jacobs +8
Second-and-2 from the 12 -- Jacobs run left +1
Third-and-1 from the 11 -- Toss right Bradshaw NG
Second Drive
First-and-10 from the 12 -- Pass to Smith +7
Second-and-3 from the 5 -- Jacobs run right +2
Third-and-1 from the 3 -- Jacobs run left NG
Fourth-and-1 from the 3 -- Jacobs run middle NG
Third Drive
First-and-10 from the 13 -- Holding -10
First-and-20 from the 23 -- Pass to Bradshaw +6
Second-and-14 from the 17 -- Inc. pass to Bradshaw
Third-and-14 from the 17 -- Pass to Bradshaw +7
A penalty stalled the third drive, but the first two were halted by an inability to pick up short yardage while trying repeatedly to simply run over the Redskins' defense. Out of those three drives, the Giants got six points. They could have had 21. Obviously, that would have made a huge difference, turning a fairly close final score into a rout.
I agree with Rock, who advocated more passes in those situations. I would particularly like to see some play-action. Some coaches consider it a sign of weakness if you have to pass to pick up a yard. I don't care, as long as the job gets done.
Manning also hinted at the possibility of passing more.
"We have to throw the ball a little bit more possibly in some of those situations," he said. "But, down there we're a team that is going to be physical, we have a big back, and we should be able to get that surge and should get a first down in those situations."
2. Spread the field
By now, I think the evidence is pretty clear that the Giants don't do their best work in the mano-a-mano 'heavy' formation situations. So, spread the field. Go three wides, even four, move Kevin Boss into the slot. Don't let the entire defense sit in the box and wait for Jacobs to come slamming up the middle. That way, you can run when you are at even strength with the defense.
3. Change the blocking personnel
On the fourth-and-one play where Jacobs got stuffed by Albert Haynesworth and the Redskins, Boss was the lead blocker. Sorry, but that's not gonna work. Boss has become a good edge blocker, but he can't be leading critical plays like that. Where is Madison Hedgecock, who gets paid to do that? Better yet, get one of the tight ends out of there if you choose to go 'heavy' and get an extra offensive lineman in the game. I really don't care which one, but an offensive lineman has a better chance of moving the pile than Boss or Darcy Johnson.
4. Run to the edges
Those kinds of plays, where maybe you can pull a guard, are the kind the Giants line seems to block the best. Maybe it takes a tad longer to develop, which is dangerous in short-yardage, but it is the kind of play the Giants run best. Play to your strength, not your weakness.
5. Ramses Barden and Travis Beckum
I know these two rookies have a ways to go before they earn the trust of the coaching staff. But, these are the types of situations Barden and Beckum were drafted for. Barden is a physical mismatch for any corner in a jump ball situation, and Beckum is a mismatch for most linebackers. As the season unfolds, the Giants need to find ways to take advantage of the talents possessed by these two young guys.
Summary
I don't think the Giants will solve this overnight, and they have proven they can win a lot of games even if they never figure it out. It sure would make things a lot easier, however, if they could take advantage of more of these situations. Hopefully, we will see some of the things I have suggested in future short-yardage situations.
68 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Look at our Quarterback...I love it...
We have to throw the ball a little bit more possibly in some of those situations
We have to throw the ball a little bit more possibly in some of those situations.
He’s so unselfish that even when the play calling needs OBVIOUS adjustments to make him more of a focal point he still doesn’t make a big deal, or talk bad on the play calling, he just states that maybe they should pass a little more…gotta love it.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, Kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 15, 2009 9:40 AM EDT reply actions
yeah
one reason why the locked this guy up for several years. you need more than talent to be the qb in ny. you gotta have a good head on your shoulders and really be a team player
another thing that'
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 15, 2009 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions
....
that’s always overlooked with Eli, the fact he goes about his job kinda like an O-lineman is very underrated.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 15, 2009 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Do they practice this stuff
Ed
You were at camp – did they practice passing in goalline and short yardage situations?
Does Eli have the authority to change the play at the LOS or does he not have the time as the Giants are always struggling to get the play off in time anyway without calling an audible?
by G Fan in England on Sep 15, 2009 9:46 AM EDT reply actions
Yeah, a little
The odd thing is they don’t practice goal line a whole lot. Apparently, they should spend more time on it.
by Ed Valentine on Sep 15, 2009 9:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Eli
He can, and does, change plays whenever he wants to.
by Ed Valentine on Sep 15, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions
SEE:
TD Pass to Mario Manningham.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, Kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 15, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions
I think the two biggest things I don't like
are the shotgun on the third short, and sweeps and tosses. Their too slow developing.
I thought last year,,
They executed the draw from shotgun pretty good on both 3rd and shorts and 3rd and longs. We’ll probably see a lot more of that this year as the offense continues to spread out defenses the way they did on Sunday (specifically the first drive, loved the play calling there).
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, Kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 15, 2009 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
They ran those with ward
faster first step than Jacobs, necessary to get the burst from a standstill position.
Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!
by bigbluethruandthru on Sep 15, 2009 9:25 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybe using Boss as a blocker
is to set up plays for later in the season where they go play-action and pass to him. We all know you don’t want Hedgecock in those situations.
All great ideas, Ed.
Like some of the others said, I’m not huge on the sweep on the goal line. I see the biggest problem being that every DC in the league would expect the Giants to run with a great OL and huge back so they’re stacking the line and are always +1 in blocking personnel (Eli’s counterpart), so there are always going to be 2 guys looking for Jacobs, who’s hard to miss. I think that’s why they tried AB down there, hoping he could hide behind a lineman, find a little crack and squeeze through it for the yard or two. I’d expect some play action this weekend against the ‘boys. Two FGs inside the 10 ain’t gonna get it done against a real offense.
maybe this is stupid...
but they always seem to pick up a yard on the ol’ QB sneak
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Sep 15, 2009 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions
Blocking
This is why I like the idea of spreading the field. You force the defense to account for 3-4 bodies who won’t be in the middle of the scrum, and give yourself a better chance. Especially if Eli stays under center to add a little disguise to the play.
by Ed Valentine on Sep 15, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions
Not that there's any question about problems in
TC’s green zone, but let’s not forget that the ‘skins have a damn good D.
That being said, I think the coaching staff has a case of the “shoulds” regarding 3rd and 1: "We should be able to do it. " But they don’t necessarily succeed. It looks like we have a couple of guys who would be good for a fade or an alley-oop. Why don’t they try it? IMO, it comes down to either stubborness or the belief that Eli doesn’t have the touch for the kind of pass needed. I don’t buy the latter (until I’ve seen him try and fail a couple of times) TC can be stubborn at times. We see it in some other situations where certain kinds of plays are called because they “should” work (“It’s a matter of execution,” or, “The players have to execute.” Well, sometimes players can’t do what they “should” be able to.
Are we “shoulding” ourselves to death?
Good point
I hope we’re not “shoulding” ourselves in the leg.
by Tucker Fredrickson on Sep 15, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions
i wish
plaxico would have done that instead
Stubbornness
That is also the impression I get, that TC is insistent that we ‘should’ be able to overpower teams, so they keep trying.
by Ed Valentine on Sep 15, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions
I think we should pass more on 3rd and 1
Right now everybody in the bldg knows what’s coming. The Eagles last year and the Redskins know us so well that you know they’ll be stacking the line because that’s all we ever do. We are made for play action. Especially with a big tarket like Boss…
Here's a radical idea....what about Whimper lined up in the backfield...or at TE...
Whimper was a TE correct?
make it look like he’s blocking and than throw it to him.
They used to do that with Hedgecock but he’s got hands like frying pans…they did w/ with Darcy Johnson last year too. Boss as well.
I just feel like the giants telegraph their runs plays so everyone and their mother knows its’ a run and the defense puts 10 guys in the box.
Personnel
I like that idea. It’s among my suggestions, and I think it’s worth a try. If you are gonna go heavy, go heavy. Kevin Boothe for fullback!! Yippee!! Everybody outta the pool. Big fella comin’ thru!
by Ed Valentine on Sep 15, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions
lol...
Ed you hear anything about Allen getting cut today? I guess RV or MG tweeted something to that affect?
Most teams don't have Albert Haynesworth.
New to the blog, but I think it’s the best I have found out there (searching for a good one for years). Great work.
Hey, I think this 3rd and 1 problem is being blown a bit out of proportion.
As my subject eludes to, Haynesworth is on of (if not THE) best DT in the game. Very few teams have interior DLines as big and talented as Washington now does. The Vikings and Jets come to mind, but thats about it. I think the OLine plus Jacobs should be fin in these situations for most of the year. The vanilla Iso or Dive up the middle should pick up 1 yard most of the time.
Last year we struggled a bit against the Eagles in the playoffs in short yardage, but I thought we tried some silly sweeps and direct snaps to Ward that we shouldn’t mess with anymore.
I’m not all that concerned that this will be a major problem going forward.
Welcome DTowbs.
I’ve been here since the off season and this is without a shadow of a doubt the best Giants blog out there. Ed does a great job of making sure this is the most up to date, Giants fan friendly environment on the web, so I’m sure you’ll be revisiting on a regular basis.
As far as your post goes I completely agree. Many people eluded to the fact that we have a “finesse” O Line, but something tells me when we’re playing a line that does not have Albert Haynesworth as the centerpiece we’ll have no problem converting 3rd and 1 on the ground.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, Kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 15, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Thanks, D
You make a great point about Haynesworth. But, the numbers show that this is not just a one-game problem. I think the Giants tried some of that trickery against the Eagles because Gilbride just wasn’t comfortable that anything else had worked consistently. They do need to figure this out.
by Ed Valentine on Sep 15, 2009 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions
These struggles are interesting
The Giants are more of a finesse running team though.. when a team has a good defensive tackle or two, they struggle in short yardage. On a play where you need to pull an offensive lineman, there’s no better team in the NFL at running the ball, but in these situations they’re average at best. Regardless of how well they did on offense, I thought Eli was in way too much of a rhythm last week to keep the ball out of his hands. I felt the play calling was way too predictable. Sometimes with Gilbride, it’s like Marty Schottenheimer is calling the plays. I did like some of the inventive stuff like that pitch to Bradshaw and the screen passes, but I could almost tell you what they’re going to do before they do it. Maybe they should try spreading the defense out and running out of the shotgun. That seemed to work against carolina.
President of the Ramses Barden Fan Club
by Hoyadestroya85 on Sep 15, 2009 11:47 AM EDT reply actions
jacobs into the end zone
Seems to me, jacobs has had great success over his career here punching it into the endzone. Usually he gets the job done. Our poor green zone numbers don’t come from having first or second and goal on the two. It’s more like between the 10 and 20 yard lines, according to my recollections.
by hopeforthefuture3 on Sep 15, 2009 11:53 AM EDT reply actions
Here's another angle....
Last year I noticed that in the first half of the season, when things were going so well for us Eli was making some excellent play action pass fake handoffs. I loved it because it seemed to give him a lot more time to stand tall in the pocket and pick the defense apart.
I think the quality of our play action fakes has been neglected lately and I can’t help but believe that our red (green) zone performance could be enhanced greatly by simply going back to basics.
by giant fan since 57 on Sep 15, 2009 1:33 PM EDT reply actions
By the way,
I think the best play pass fakes I ever saw came from Boomer Essiason.
by giant fan since 57 on Sep 15, 2009 1:34 PM EDT reply actions
He was really good, 57,
but did you ever see Johnny U? He was a magician. Remember the replay of the “greatest game ever played?”
BOSS
needs to be the go to guy in the green zone. as for the short yardage, they need to throw in some passing plays but they also need to figure out how to get it done with the run. got to have both options available in this league.
They did that on Sunday
On a 2nd and 1 I believe they took a shot at the end zone, nice play, fell incomplete though. They than went on to fail converting the 3rd and 1 by running on the next play.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, Kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 15, 2009 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Yep
and they need to continue to call his number. not every play is going to be successful
Agree on that 100%
Eli showed he could shoulder the offensive load on those fist two series…he drove the team right into the [insert favorite crayola color here] zone, but it seems once they got there they shied away from letting him gun it in.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, Kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 15, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions
the fuchsia zone
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Sep 16, 2009 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions
Barden
would like to this guys number called down there to. i understand he hasn’t gotten the route running down yet but how hard is it to run to the corner of the end zone.
Must spead the Field
Long time lurker, first time poster.
Anyway, watching New England last night, I am convinced that if the Giants spread the field more they will be very successful. Especially on 3rd and 1 or 4th and 1. Jacobs can still handle those short yardage carries, but by spreading the field there should be less coming from the defensive front. Jacobs could power through for a yard or 2 easily. At least the defense would have to think about a pass even if one never came.
definitely
On short yardage/goal-line, I’d like to see them put both Barden and Beckum in, with Jacobs in the backfield. Eli can call the play at the line based on the D he sees. If Barden is single covered, you gotta throw him the fade… Otherwise, you pound the rock with Jacobs.
That said, I think we should limit the snaps that those two see in the game to just certain situations for now. Make them “green zone specialists” and short yardage guys for now. Give them small, but critical roles to focus on.
Whatever… I trust the coaching staff. They know what’s up! ;-)
by M. on Sep 15, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions
Gilbride-itis
This is what drives me crazy about Glibride: He’ll do what everyone in the stadium is expecting, particularly on third-and-short. If we’re gonna do that, then we ought to commit to it. Run behind McKenzie/Snee and Hedgecock and get that #($*ing yard. Don’t sub in AB. Or Ware. Use the big fella, run him behind a fullback and impose our will.
Or else pass. We’re certainly set up for it.
I left my swagger in my other pants.
Coaches
Hey, if Tommy didn’t want to run yet another I formation handoff into the heart of the D, there’s nothing stopping him from going over to Gilbride and saying so… he does have that veto power.
I’m with the spread fans. Eli makes his reads quickly, Jacobs can block any speed rusher coming off the corner, we have physical matchup problems with Boss, Beckum, Barden, could always swing one out to Jacobs in the flat as a check down. I say put Barden in one corner for a fade, Boss on the back-line cross, Smith crossing shallow the other way, Manningham on a quick curl or something on the other end, with Jacobs in to block/check down.
Did Y'all hear Ware's comment?
He was quoted as saying he hates the Giants..Good Let’s beat him down..We hate the Cowgirls also..If we can work some kinks out this week he’ll be on his bigshot back all game long..and if our defense can gel a little better..Romo will have major problems.
third and short
It is frustrating to see dive plays up the middle get little or not enought to culminate an effective time consumming drive. Eli is trying to stretch the field, and the Kiddie Korp of receivers will develop. iT is difficult to pass from in close with, with current personnal. Anyone remember the GB power sweep?, Jabobs and Bradshaw can get to the edge,
so if the line isnt a power blocking straight ahead group add an extra lineman and make pass elegible, but use him in the sweep in combination with Hedgecock
by sudden death overtime on Sep 15, 2009 5:19 PM EDT reply actions
organizing a Top 5 offense?
Being the OC on a SB winning team?
Being the OC on a 12-4 team following that year?
Killdrive at times? Yea. But he did play a part in those marches down the field. Gotta credit failed execution sometimes too…
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 15, 2009 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Right on.
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, Kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Sep 15, 2009 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions
oline a bit undersized
I agree that part of the problem is everyone expects a run up the middle on 3rd and short in the green zone. But the o line isn’t as big as say the Eagles and Cowboys. Mckenzie has good size at about 330 lbs. Diehl isn’t bad at 320 lbs but it goes down from there for the starters. The backups are definitely undersized with Whimper, Koets and Reyens all at about 300 even. With Haynesworth, the Williams duo, BJ Raji and Ron Brace among others, 300 lbs will get man handled and bull rushed all game long.
?
Diehl is 319, Seubert is a tiny 310, O"Hara is 303, Snee is 317, McKenzie is 327.
How is that undersized? They average 315lbs. And I doubt that McKenzie is 327 right now. Diehl is a mountain too.
How about it was cuz Haynesworth is the best DT in the game, weighs probably more than his listed 360lbs too. Or maybe it was Jacbos going straight ahead into a wall of defenders when he probably should have made a cut.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 16, 2009 6:57 AM EDT up reply actions
Haynesworth honestly scares me
He’s not fat, you know? He’s 360+ and most of that is muscle. We ran successfully when we ran away from him, why try and stuff it down the middle in short yardage situations if all you’re gonna do is bounce off the guy?
20 quality lbs
IMO Beatty should add about 20 quality lbs by next season. I think a starting tackle should be in the 330 lb range. For that matter, Seubert, O’hara and Snee should add 20 quality pounds(not blubber) as well. For guys 6’3 to 6’5 and 300 lbs already, that shouldn’t be hard to do.
Well they all have that 20lbs over 300...cuz they all actually are aroung 320.....
and that makes no sense too.
The Giants have the best O-Line in the game. We don’t need gigantic Fats on the line. THey do just fine the way they are.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 16, 2009 6:58 AM EDT up reply actions
power up
With a bulked up line and maybe a two tight end set with at least one 280 lb TE, they should have kept Vickers, a 270 lb fullback and 270 lb half back, I don’t care how may are in the box. We’re going to get some yards.
Green zone
Right on Ed. The Giants cannot under estimate the opposition these days, we have to use some imagination, especially in the RED ZONE. It’s dishearten and must hurt the players morale when we drove down the length of the field and get just 3 points or nothing for it.
does anyone remember....
Jacobs rookie season? He was used primarily for 3rd and 4th and shorts, and goal line situations. And 9 times out of 10 he made them, with the same line pretty much. So what happened?
I have 2 theories. Theory 1 is that he came on the scene like the tazmanian devil, and defenders didn’t know what to do, and how deep to dig there heels in. Opposing DC’s didn’t gameplan for him either. This element of surprise allowed him to have that original success.
Theory 2: Jacobs ran harder then. That’s not to say he doesn’t run hard now, as urlacher and landry will tell you. I liken it to joba chamberlain of the yanks. Yanks fans in here know this to be true, that in joba’s rookie season when he was that 8th inning phenom, his heat was hitting 100 on the gun. Now that he is a starter(sort of) he has to sustain his stuff for 6 or more innings, so he dials his stuff down to 92-95. Still nasty, just not as overpowering. Well that’s how Jacobs was his rookie season. He knew he was in there for one play, and he knew what he had to do. He knew he had to give it all on that one play, because tiki was trotting out for the next one. Now he knows he needs to sustain himself for 20 carries a game, 16+ games a season. So he hits, but not with as much authority as that young hungry mini beast that was eager to show, prove, and demolish.
Just 2 working theories of mine….
by wilddre22 on Sep 16, 2009 1:31 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
...He's running into a wall....of Haynesworth.
…..and maybe varying the playcall a time or 2 would help. Every time they do the same thing. There’s nothing in the defense’s head that they will do anything else.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 16, 2009 7:01 AM EDT up reply actions
No score.
for wilddre22-theory 3 the Giants tried to run over Housxxxxxxxxxxxx( however u spell his name). Just bad offensive play calling.
I have the solution
Sign a “little person” to the NFL minimum salary. Use him in goal-line situations in the backfield with hedgecock. Have Madison pick him up and fling him over the pile.
Does the name Eddie Gaedel ring a bell for anyone? He’s the midget Bill Veeck hired in MLB to draw walks — his strike zone was too small b/c he was 3’7" tall.
You play to win the game!
Well
I was going to suggest signing a super athletic RB who can just leap over the line (BLT did that a lot in his 30 TD season, Westbrook is good at it too), but I like Simms-McConkey’s idea better.
20 quality pounds
Like I said, consider BJ Raji, Haynesworth, Williams, Brace, etc. These guys are 330 lbs and up from there plus they are more athletic being d lineman. Also, take a look at the cowgirls and Eaglets o lines, they are bigger than ours. I’m just saying our oline has to be able to plow these guys out of the way and to do that you need power/bulk. That could help a little with the green zone issue.
No.
Those 2 lines are not in the Giants O-Line’s caliber. Let them draft and sign all the gigantic fats they want. THere’s a reason the Giants have ran for more yards than both of those teams. Why the hell mess with success? And getting as big as them will not make them better.
The Giants have, more than likely between them and the Titans, the best O-Line in the league.
There is no logical reason to fatten them all up to copy the Pies and Eggs when the Giants O-Line is in another class.
Who the hell cares about Raji, he’s not even a player yet, Brace too.
Its one game, Haynesworth is known as the best DT in the game too and they still ran well.
What the f$%k is the internet?
by FreeBradshaw on Sep 17, 2009 7:31 AM EDT up reply actions

by 



















