For New York Giants defensive coordinator Bill Sheridan, no learning curve allowed
I have said before that one of the intriguing things about this season for the New York Giants will be judging the performance of their coordinators. This may be particularly true in the case of defensive coordinator Bill Sheridan. He has no track record for us to lean on, and his unit has the talent to be among the league's best.
Paul Schwartz of The New York Post hits the nail on the head when it comes to expectations for Sheridan and his defense.
There can be no easing into anything, no prolonged period of adjustment. No 35 points allowed in Sheridan's debut as defensive coordinator, no 80 points given up in his first two games.
Those were the sad results his predecessor, Steve Spagnuolo, now head coach of the Rams, experienced to start the 2007 season -- a double dose of ineptitude that had everyone (but Spagnuolo) thinking bad thoughts before the ship was righted and set sail to Super Bowl glory.
That was a different time, different defense. The hand Sheridan -- the linebackers coach the past four years -- has been dealt is stacked, chock full of aces capable of stopping the run and dropping the quarterback.
Eli Manning and his young receivers will slog through some early growing pains, and they'd better be able to lean on great support from a beastly defense that should rank in the top five in every category and could lead the NFL in sacks.
It is a sentiment I agree wholeheartedly with. If this group stays healthy and still does not become a dominant force that helps push the Giants deep into the playoffs the blame will fall squarely on the shoulders of the rookie defensive coordinator.
In all honesty, I believe Sheridan will do just fine. The Giants are loaded with talented defenders, especially players who love to rush the passer. Provided Sheridan does not commit the cardinal sin of reigning them in, which I don't expect him to, the Giants defense should be terrific.
Anyway, here are five questions I think Sheridan will have to answer this season for the Giants defense to be the dominant, championship-caliber group many think it could be.
- How well can he massage egos? Sheridan has already has a short-lived blowup with Osi Umenyiora, and Umenyiora has made it plain he wants to be on the field as much as possible. How will Sheridan handle Osi and Mathias Kiwanuka, who is the third defensive end, wants to start and won't be happy if he is watching more than playing. Oh, and there are four starting-caliber defensive tackles to keep happy, too. A nice problem, but still one that bears watching.
- Antonio Pierce. This should really read 'what does he do if Antonio Pierce does not play well?' AP is the emotional leader of the Giants' defense, and in many ways the coach on the field. But, Pierce did not play well at the end of last season. Was he just distracted by the whole mess with you know who, or is he really slipping as he enters his 9th season. If he is slipping, what does Sheridan do about it?
- In-game adjustments. Can Sheridan make quick changes on the fly when his original plan isn't working? Only time will tell on this one.
- The cornerback puzzle. Corey Webster is entrenched at one corner. Between Aaron Ross, Kevin Dockery and Terrell Thomas which one will emerge to solidify the other side? I think all three will play a significant amount, so this one might not be a question at all.
- Can he remember to stay aggressive? One of the things I admired about Steve Spagnuolo was that he almost always stayed aggressive in his calls. Even when the Giants were ahead late and many defensive coordinators would be in the God-awful prevent defense, Spags would generally stay with four rushers and his blitz packages. Sheridan is a more cerebral personality, and I am hoping he remembers the Spagnuolo philosophy that being aggressive is always better than being passive.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bill Sheridan
I think Sheridan has too much talent on D to fail. I think his biggest problem is going to find time for all the talent that he has. The guy has two NFL starting lines. I think that your first point sums it up. If Sheridan can keep the egos in check, he’ll be great. Our guys know the defense and they’ve tasted a championship before. Also, the sting of last year’s collaspe will help a little. Once the D rotation is set, they should run like clockwork.
yeah, i'm sure Osi
is not going to like coming outta the game in passing situation. But if it is a sure fire passing down they could move Tuck inside and let Kiwi and Osi both line up at DE.
I’m actually not sure if i like Osi coming out in favor of Kiwi anyway. I mean, everyone needs a breather but you need your best guys on the field. And until Kiwi proves other wise Osi > Kiwi.
People always look at our ’07 run and talk about depth on the dline. Our depth was essentially one guy; Tuck. Strahan and Osi hardly ever came off the field….and when they did it was not for extended periods of time. And when Tuck did come in, often times it was at DT on passing situations.
Sure Tollefson got some snaps here and there, Alford got some late in the game but they’re were not huge impact players.
I still think there’s a learning curve for Sheridan. Obviously as NYers we won’t give him one but i’m giving him a few games….
that's not true at all
Strahan was a part timer that last year. He Tuck bascially split time 1st and 2nd downs.
I disagree...
Tuck may have gotten some snaps at DE but they certainly were not splitting time.
I don’t remember Strahan being a “part timer” at all that year.
anyone else care to weigh in on this????
don't get me wrong...
i know Tuck got reps at DE…obviously he is a DE, but he also played at DT in passing downs. See the Super Bowl.
Maybe not a split
but Strahan did get a lot of plays off with Tuck coming in. I don’t know what the percentage was, but it was significant and it helped keep MS fresh.
The 5-1-5 package(which we won't see this week with Ross and Dockery out)
Will keep these guys happy. There is enough QB for everyone to get a piece. The DT’s are going to get hurt the most in terms of playing time but if the defense is getting to the QB who is going to go out of their way to complain about it?
hurt?
Seems like the defensive tackles have been hurt by the playing time they got. None of them are completely healthy, which is why the Giants held onto some guy whose name I can’t remember or pronounce instead of Maurice Evans.
by hopeforthefuture3 on Sep 10, 2009 3:21 PM EDT up reply actions
douzable...
but the giants would have carried 5 DT’s regardless…they certainly were not going to cut Alford.
a lot of pressure on sheridan
spanuolo left some big shoes to fill, but the level and depth of talent on this team is ridiculous. if these defense doesnt get it done, it lies entirely on bill sheridans shoulders. if they fail down the stretch i could see him losing his job.
by GiantsReignSupreme on Sep 10, 2009 2:23 PM EDT reply actions

by 



















