Let's talk about Kevin Gilbride
There were a few comments Tuesday about the play-calling of offensive coordinator Kevin Gilbride in Monday's 24-17 victory by our New York Giants over the Carolina Panthers.
If you were paying attention, you know I took umbrage to the criticism of Gilbride. That's not because I always agree with KG -- though I will defend him more often than many of you would like -- but because this was a largely meaningless pre-season game.
Face it, coaches are working mostly with different personnel in pre-season games than they will be during the regular season. And decisions are often made based on factors other than the score, or down and distance.
Let's talk a bit about Gilbride here. But, we are also going to set a ground rule. Say what you want about Gilbride when you comment on THIS post. But, leave him alone in terms of the rest of the pre-season games. Killing him for pre-season play calls is over the top. Save your indignation for the regular season. Please!
OK, so now that I have that out of the way let's have a -- hopefully rational -- discussion about the guy who spends NFL Sundays speaking into Eli Manning's ear.
There is an incredibly vocal minority -- and yes, you guys are a minority -- of Giants' fans who will kill Gilbride for just about everything. Every bad throw by Eli, every drive that doesn't result in points. Every penalty. Every sack. Every dropped pass. Every missed field goal (because we should have had a touchdown). Shoot, some of you probably would kill the guy for getting out of bed in the morning.
In all honesty, I believe the incredible hatred Gilbride generates is not justified.
I have defended Gilbride before, and I am sure I will end up doing it again. And again. and again.
This is part of what I wrote last season when the Giants were 6-1, and another blogger had called Gilbride 'delusional.'
Look at the big picture. The Giants are third in the league in yardage per game (378.9) and have the best running attack in the league (157.3 yards per game). The Giants have scored 191 points (27.3 per game). Among teams that have played seven games, only four have scored more (Arizona tops that list with 200 points).
How bad of a job can Gilbride actually be doing?
You might not think the Giants offense is exciting, but victories are definitely exciting. And the Giants are doing what they need to do on offense to win games.
They have a balanced attack other teams are envious of. They can run the ball effectively, using any of three backs. They can throw the ball effectively with short, intermediate and long passes to a variety of targets. They don't turn the ball over.
Gilbride has to get credit for these things.
Yes, there are times when things the Giants do on offense drive me crazy. But, we are Giants' fans. We have spent a lifetime of Sundays having this team drive us crazy. That concept wasn't invented by Gilbride. When Gilbride leaves, the next guy will drive us crazy, too. Bank on it.
I found it funny re-reading my defense of Gilbride when I saw that Steeler fans were killing their coordinator, Bruce Arians, and wishing he was more like Gilbride. Who won the Super Bowl again?
Sometimes, you have to get away from the emotion of the moment and, as I said last season, take a good look at that big picture. With the Giants, it is a pretty nice view.
The Giants have enjoyed tremendous success with Gilbride calling the plays the past two seasons. They won a Super Bowl in 2007, and an NFC East title last season.
More numbers.
They scored 427 points and totaled 338 first downs, both the second-highest totals in franchise history. They led the NFL with 2,518 yards rushing, and an average of 5.0 yards per carry. In 2008, the Giants gained 25 yards more per game than they did in the Super Bowl season of 2007.
If the offensive coordinator was a complete idiot, as some of you think he is, these things would not have happened. Depending on your opinion, Jon Gruden might have been stretching it the other night by calling Gilbride one of the best in the business. But, he is hardly incompetent.
The guy has been coaching in the NFL 20 years, and this is his fifth stint as an offensive coordinator. Obviously, Tom Coughlin isn't the only head coach who thinks KG knows what he is doing. Along the way, Gilbride has handled everything from the Run 'N Shoot to the Giants power attack.
Now, I know Gilbride has flaws. The offensive game plans sometimes leave me scratching my head, as does the seemingly glacial pace at which KG makes in-game adjustments. In the name of the balance the Giants always seek I sometimes think Gilbride also tends not to ride a play, or player, that is obviously working. Yes, I wanted to throttle him after the Philly debacle last season.
But, we aren't all that far removed from the days of John Hufnagel, and the disaster that was some of the play-calling of Jim Fassel toward the end of his tenure as Giants' head coach.
So, be careful what you wish for. And, please, save your bullets for the regular-season games.
0 recs |
97 comments
|
Comments
Kevin Gilbride
No matter who calls the plays, as a fan if that play doesn’t work we are going to question it, if it does work we love it. Just the way it works, Gilbride knows this. That being said i like Gilbride and atleast will give him a chance to show what he is made of now that all the teams diva’s are gone. When it comes down to it i just want to see great defense, a running game that kills the clock and no turnovers. Is that so much to ask for?
by gobs56 on Aug 19, 2009 7:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sure, gobs
Fans are emotional. When things don’t work, we get upset. That doesn’t always mean it was a bad play call. Sometimes, players screw up. Sometimes, the other team makes a good play.
by Ed Valentine on Aug 19, 2009 7:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ed, you can prove anything with stats.
70% of people know that.
by BigBlue4Life on Aug 19, 2009 7:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Haha!
Now that’s a riot!!!..Ed crunches so many numbers it makes my head spin..haha
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah but everybody knows 75% of all stats are made up on the spot anyway
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Aug 19, 2009 9:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
and now 99% of these jokes have been used
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Aug 19, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Go easy on Ed
Half the time he’s 80% right on about three-quarters of his material.
by Jaybat on Aug 19, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Depending on the phase of the moon
and full it is.
by brisulph on Aug 19, 2009 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As one of the vocal minority
on “Team Killdrive,” yes, I can back up, look at the situation objectively, and realize that 90% of his time with the Giants, KG has been a good offensive coordinator. The problem is that steady, good offenses are easy to not notice, and occasional mind-boggling idiocy stands out. It’s not fair to judge the guy for what probably amounts to one series per game. And really, if it is one incredibly dumb series per game, I’d have to think you could chalk it up to going for the element of surprise.
That said, here’s what drives me nuts about KG: 8-yard run on 1st down. 2nd and 2. Drop back, mid-to-long pass, incomplete. 3rd and 2. Drop back, mid-to-long pass, 4th and 2. Then, if it’s not a punt, run the draw against a stuffed goalline box. The reason it kills me is because there’s no way this team is not going to pick up 2 yards on 3 runs. or for pete’s sake, try a screen pass or a quick out if you’re determined to throw!
Along the same vein of inconsistency, there’s also 1 or 2 games in the season in which KG seems to forget the strengths and what’s working and stick to some inexplicable game plan for 58 minutes in the face of its obvious failure. To be fair, I don’t know what value the element of surprise is valuable in game planning. But if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!
In all, I can rationally say that KG is a strong OC 90-95% of the time and I don’t say a word. But when I’m in front of the TV and we hit one of these glitches, I flip out and go berserk. It’s just the nature of the megalomaniacal fan who wants to win every game 77-0.
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Aug 19, 2009 7:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
LOL!!
77-0? Not 84-0? Yeah, I get the emotion and there are times I feel it, too. You will be happy to note, as you saw Monday, that it looks like the quick screen to both the backs and the wide receivers seems to be a big part of what the Giants are looking to do with this group.
As for those 1-2 games, I know. There is an occasional game where I think ‘what were thinking with that game plan?’ But, I suppose that happens to everyone.
by Ed Valentine on Aug 19, 2009 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
77-0……ahhhh the Madden 03 days
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Aug 19, 2009 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not a gilbride hater, but i agree
i agree with simms-mc on his assessment of mr. Gilbride. as crazy as this sounds, we seem to abandon the run too quickly at times. and i say that sounds crazy because we led the league in rushing! but that leads to my point. if we led the league, and big boy jacobs gets 8 on 1st down, why not run it on 2nd down? i know we’re setting up the pass with the run, but lets set it up even more. it’s far and few in between where we see 3 runs in a row. sometimes that is the element of surprise, especially when the D is looking for pass on 2nd and 3rd down.
that said, i have little problem with KG. outside of that, i love what we do with our O, and hopefully he and Eli will spread the ball to what i think is a bunch of secret weapons. one thing, i hear that they want to stretch the field more this year, but i saw little evidence of that on monday. do you think they just took what the D gave them, or they don’t really want to show there hand too much in the preseason?
by wilddre22 on Aug 19, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pre-season
I doubt they want to show too much. Also, you had backup offensive linemen in most of the game, and they really did not do a good job. Can’t throw the ball down the field without time.
by Ed Valentine on Aug 19, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't always
blame KG for passing after an 8 yd run. If I was on D and they were running 8 yds a pop on me, I’d expect more running. The fact that he DOESN’T go to the run again right away is what makes teams have to respect the pass, making the run all the more effective in the long run (ah that was punny).
It may be true that the G-men could be a run twice (or thrice), pass once team and be very effective. But I think odds are that teams would catch on by December and start stuffing that run. Where many see abandoning the run when it’s hot, I see continuing to balance the attack, keeping more possibilities open in the D’s mind.
by Jaybat on Aug 19, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well put Ed
I agree wholeheartedly with your assessment and can’t think of a thing to add.
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 8:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Adjustments
I think KG’s biggest flaw (& we’ve gone over this before) is that he’s simply poor at adjusting, whether that it is during a game or even over the course of a season. During games he’ll stick to a game plan when it is obviously not working (as Simms-McConkey states … see Philly game), but at other times will go away from what IS working and kill the offensive momentum. An obvious example over a season is his inability to adjust the game plan after Plax went down. It seems to me a top flight offensive mind that is able to adjust would have been able to figure that out with the talent the Giants still had an offense.
That being said, I still think he’s a decent OC. He might not adjust well, but give him time to plan and make him stick to his game (which I think TC has demanded at times … see ’07 playoff run) and you simply can not argue with the results (as Ed lays out).
by potroast on Aug 19, 2009 8:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree with the proponents..
that felt our defense let us down not the “shooter”.
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not laying the blame on the offense for not going to the SB
I’m talking strictly O and the OC here.
by potroast on Aug 19, 2009 9:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Red Zone Offense
Killdrive’s biggest problem is in the red zone. The Giants led the league last year in possessions inside the red zone, but finished WORST in the league in TD:FG ratio once inside the red zone. We can rack up all the yards in the world, but until we start scoring more TDs in the red zone, I’m going to be skeptical of his playcalling. The Eagles playoff game was a perfect example of his ineptness in the red zone. I recall a 1st and 5 from right around the 20 yard line (after running the ball all the way down the field). Killdrive called three straight passes that didn’t result in a first down, which if I recall correctly, was followed by a missed FG.
by kevin killdrive on Aug 19, 2009 9:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Red Zone
One problem the Giants have in the Red Zone is that they actually have a ‘finesse’ offensive line. Goal line requires power, straight-ahead blocking and the Giants don’t have those type of linemen. They do a lot of pulling, trapping, etc. I also think Barden and Beckum will impact their Red Zone effectiveness this season.
by Ed Valentine on Aug 19, 2009 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Attempting to Cop Some Genius Crede
I live in the Tampa area and listened to the local sports guys crucify the Bucs when they went to the Meadowlands and threw 55 times in typical late season ML weather.
Then a couple of weeks later the Gmen do the same thing in Buffalo. Uhh? Maybe on paper that is the way the Billls should have been attacked, but like Clauswitz said, no plan survives contact with the enemy. And Eli, though I love the guy, hasn’t yet mastered throwing in crappy weather, cold yes, sleet, swirling winds, not so much.
Conan!, What is good in Football?!
Daa.... to run between the tackles,
To drive the linebackers before you,
And to hear the lamentations of the cheerleaders.
by The Pale Scot on Aug 19, 2009 9:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Gilbride
gets no credit for the run game. It’s always easy to second guess. If we run the ball on every 2nd and 2, then we’ll here people complain about not taking shots downfield and that’s the perfect down to do it. Then if you run the ball and don’t make it, everyone will say we were too conservative. Ed, there’s no way to win this argument because there’s always somebody that thinks they’re a better play caller. But as you said about him coordinating the run and shoot and one of the best running games in the league.. I’ll take him because we could surely do worse…
by Lt56giants on Aug 19, 2009 9:19 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Qualifier
He’s got the best personnel in the league to run with. If we weren’t in the top 5 in the run, he should/would/could be let go.
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Aug 19, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The best personnel?
The year we won the SB we didn’t have one offensive pro bowler. I’m not saying gilbride is perfect. But watch some other games and you see he could be a lot worse. Even the coordinators in the NFC east aren’t too good. And that’s for the supposed best division in football. Can it ever be about execution or is it always about the play calling? If Eli hits Steve Smith on the first play of the Eagle game for a td does Gilbride get credit for that? What about Hixon’s drop? Those are huge plays that are td’s that we forget about..
by Lt56giants on Aug 19, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm just saying,
best O-Line in the league, Brandon Jacobs, Ahmad Bradshaw, Derrick Ward, and a good pass game to keep’em honest.
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Aug 19, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
but the line and the rb’s don’t just become good because you put them on the field. It’s a combination of coaching, schemes, and play calling. Eli makes a lot of the run calls at the line. Those are calls that Gilbride has put into the system. It all works together. You can’t just think that any OC would get the same result. Before Spags came we had talent on D. But he put them in position to excel. Gilbride does the same.
I do have a problem with some of the play calling. But overall the Giants have as good an offense as I can ever remember and Gilbride is at the controls..
by Lt56giants on Aug 19, 2009 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right
There is no way to ‘win’ this one. As you said, I just wanted to point out that he does deserve some credit.
by Ed Valentine on Aug 19, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
to be fair
i will not complain if gillbride runs too much
by queler on Aug 19, 2009 1:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
disagree
with the statement ’ you are a minority’. Most giant fans are unhappy with OC, we just don’t comment all the time. This OC is the weak link on this team,has been since he got here. We really don’t understand why you keep defending him.
by jerseybillfromva on Aug 19, 2009 9:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
jerseybill, while I would agree that on occasion the offensive game-planning has been a head scratcher, I don’t think it is fair to say the OC is a “weak link”
1. He has come up with an offensive game plan that has helped the franchise quarterback minimize his mistakes. A good coordinator or coach knows how to do that.
2. Eli’s INT’s are way down, completion pct way up. You have to credit at least part of that to coaching.
3. He has helped put together a running game that when executed properly, no one can stop. Vince Lombardi often told his Green Bay teams, “If we execute this play correctly, it will work no matter how many times we run it”, when talking about the famed “Power Sweep”
4. If you want to point at the offensive woes down the stretch, all I can tell you is, Gilbride didn’t shoot the star WR in the leg. The Giants were thrown into complete tumult after that happened. Constant distractions, and not having another dynamic type WR that defenses had to focus on when Plaxico was out.
5. It’s easy for us to sit in our recliners and call offensive plays based on hindsight. Gilbride does it on foresight, and I would have to say he is pretty successful.
Sorry I just can’t agree with you here
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Aug 19, 2009 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I went by
the poll that was conducted here. Small sample size, I know, but it’s what I had. Also, I think Hufnagel was a terrible OC. I don’t think you get 5 OC jobs in your career by being terrible. I have issues with Gilbride sometimes, sure. I just think the Giants do an awful lot of good things offensively, and he should get some props for that. Now, when he tries to be pass-happy on a miserable day in Buffalo he deserves to get killed for that, too.
by Ed Valentine on Aug 19, 2009 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget to add Ray Perkins, Bill Arnsparger, John McVay and Ray Handely to the list..
How does KG look now?
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
So, because those guys were stupid as F...
…we don’t get to criticize Gilbride when he screws up?
And shame on you for mentioning Handley’s name. He is never to be discussed.
by New York Sports Jerk on Aug 19, 2009 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL!! on Handley..Ugh!!!..but at least we got a SB win with KG..He drives me nuts too at times.
But..look it has always been that way, and far far worse…For years the defense would come off the field and holler to the offense: “Hold-em”..If you were to compare our OCs to the DCs it is a hands down vote in favor of our DCs over the years.
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arnsparger was a defensive guy
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Aug 19, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes he was but he took over offenseive play calling when he was with the Giants..
..and what a disaster that was.
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good post ed I agree with you all the way. Its a good thing all u gilbride haters r not the offensive coordinators of this team.. they would run the ball 300 times a game and land all of our running backs on the dl….
by nycity on Aug 19, 2009 9:42 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Point taken.
I’m usually critical of KG, although I don’t get worked up over the pre-season because I know it’s really meaningless, but you’re right we need to keep in mind he led us to a Superbowl victory and followed it up with a 12-4 season.
by John W on Aug 19, 2009 10:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I guess when it’s all said and done, we should be thankful that we have Gilbride and face the fact that we’ll never have The Greatest Show on Turf.
by njgiant on Aug 19, 2009 10:10 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
interesting topic...but you can't please everyone
this is NY…and i believe NY has some of the most knowledgeable sport fans….and the most opinionated.
some fans are going to give KG a hard time. Just like some people wanted TC’s head after the ’06 season….just like Eli has to deal with the naysayers even till this day. just like AP after last year…..
it comes with the territory, yes KG, makes questionable calls but we’ve seen worse…much worse.
Heck Just the other day i was trying to explain to some folks over at ESPN that Corey Webster was a top 10 corner last year (closer to top 5). After posting about 3-4 articles full of stats showing that Corey was in fact top 10 people still fail to acknowledge it. I wasn’t’ even worth getting upset over…some people just CHOSE not to get it.
by andiamo708 on Aug 19, 2009 10:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I still have nightmares from Fassel's prevent defense....
take about a guy without a clue…
by andiamo708 on Aug 19, 2009 10:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i’ll never understand the Fassel bashing…he was a good coach and deserves to be in the league again.
by wilddre22 on Aug 19, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
two words....
prevent defense.
that is the reason he’s in the UFL not the NFL.
by andiamo708 on Aug 19, 2009 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Spagnuolo had plenty of instances he used prevent (you from winning) defense
I hate when anyone uses it.
Fassel wasn’t the DC remember……
Do what Jerry Hairston do
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 19, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, last i checked, Jimmy F. didn’t invent the D, nor is not the only guy to use it. he is not in the NFL for other reasons, not for his use of the prevent.
by wilddre22 on Aug 19, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the D
was on Johnny Lynn the worst DC EVER, I will not argue about this
by queler on Aug 19, 2009 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
If I ever hear the words “read and react” used in conjunction with the Giants D I will throw a shoe at the wall.
Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!
by bigbluethruandthru on Aug 19, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
re: fassel
He didn’t know til it was too late. Here is the story that somehow didn’t get nearly as much play as it should have about the train wreck that was Johnny Lynn http://nyg.scout.com/2/223379.html
by queler on Aug 19, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gilbride
You sorta just mention it in passing. The Philly disaster. If Gilbride can’t handle crucial situations, what can we uxpect in the future?
by Babu on Aug 19, 2009 10:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
so I guess Super Bowl XLII against an 18-0 team
or the NFC Championship game in some of the coldest weather a football game has ever been played in don’t count as “crucial” situations?
by cjmulrain on Aug 19, 2009 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
There were no offensive gems in the playoffs that year.
They could put up 20 and count on the defense to be stellar. If I knew before the SB they were going to put up 17 points, I would have felt apprehensive going up against the greatest offense in the history of the NFL. I’ll always put credit for that whole run on the D.
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Aug 19, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But you have to give some credit to the offense for getting the points when necessary no? I mean, Eli did drive them down the field for the Championship TD, and outplayed every QB he was up against in the playoffs that year.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Aug 19, 2009 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Eli/KG
are fantastic in the 2 minute drill. Sometimes I think they should bust it out just for surprise. And yes, he had a good stretch. None of that really addresses my concerns with the occasional mind-boggler, which I admit is disproportionate…
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Aug 19, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was just
..going to mention their success in the two minute offense…KG gets alot of the credit along with Eli’s poise in executing it..I think it is the best in the league.
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
true, the D was outstanding against the Pats
but the offense was pretty darned good against the Packers, all things considered. The fact that they only scored 23 and had to win in OT is on Lawrence Tynes, not Kevin Gilbride. And I also think you have to give the Patriots defense some credit too – they were undefeated for a reason, and it wasn’t 100% b/c of their offense.
by cjmulrain on Aug 19, 2009 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The defenses the Giants face leading up to and including the Bowl
were all on par with the Giants defense.
Gilbride (and for that matter, Eli……people who still hate on this guy really have no clue….) gamplaned very well for those games.
Do what Jerry Hairston do
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 19, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
c'mon FB
NO defense is on a par with the G-Men!
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Aug 19, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im trying to point out
that Eli deserves more credit for what exactly he did during that run.
Yea, all those D’s are all very good. Eli and the passing game were the sole offense during the playoffs and it was against those great defenses.
They all may not have had the pass rush the Giants did, but there sure were good.
Do what Jerry Hairston do
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 19, 2009 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agreed and agreed
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Aug 19, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No offensive gems in the playoffs that year!?
Simms, buddy…how about a TEN MINUTE DRIVE to open up the game against the Pats in the Super Bowl? How else would we have had rushers fresh enough to get to Brady in that game And what about the drive to end the second half against Dallas in the Divisional??
It’s fine giving credit to our stellar defense…but just think about how much more rest they get than any other team in football when Eli and the boys are holding onto the ball for more than half the game….that’s a huge advantage for our defense, which is created by our offense (and KG)
"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, Kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."
by tito (eight and oh) on Aug 19, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
not about Gilbride
its funny…I totally agreed with the guy who made the inital comment about the Giants playcalling Monday in the second half. They looked like they were in a midseason game trying to run out the clock with a lead. It’s not like I wanted them to go five wide and start chucking the ball every down, but I figured that they would want to give the receivers more opportunity to see who can make a play.
by mcgatman on Aug 19, 2009 11:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I will say this about Monday night
I just sat thru a Coughlin presser, and he was very, very unhappy with the backup o-linemen Monday. I think a lot of the play-calling was because they felt handicapped by the porous blocking from those guys.
by Ed Valentine on Aug 19, 2009 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't believe I'm going to defend Kevin Gilbride
I wanted his head after the Philly loss, but an offseason of reflection has mostly changed my opinion on him. That stat they showed during the game Monday was pretty telling – we’re talking about a guy who has had the #1 pass offense 4 times for 2 different teams, and has had the #1 rush offense twice for 2 other different teams. His teams are always, no matter what offense he runs, among the top scoring teams in the league. That’s pretty compelling evidence that at the very least, he’s not awful.
My one big criticism of Gilbride is his ability to adjust. The comparison I’m about to make might make sense to Mets fans (especially Amazin Avenue readers), but Gilbride reminds me a little bit of Jeff Francouer. As any baseball fan knows, Francouer isn’t exactly Barry Bonds when it comes to taking pitches – if the ball is going to land somewhere in between the dugouts, he’s gonna swing at it. Occasionally he’ll take a pitch, but it’s seems obvious that he had determined before the pitch was thrown that he wasn’t going to swing – he has no pitch recognition, so his takes almost seem random. I think that’s sorta like Gilbride with adjustments – sometimes in the face of overwhelming evidence he won’t make any adjustments, and other times he’ll make them randomly even though the offense is going strong. I think he’s a fantastic game planner, but I don’t think he has a great feel for the flow of the game, and so he just says “with x amount of time left in today’s game, I’m gonna switch the game plan” – and if the Giants offense is rolling he’ll change it up, and if they’re struggling he’s still gonna wait for x to switch. That, to me, is the one great failing of Kevin Gilbride, and it was on full display in both Eagles games last year.
by cjmulrain on Aug 19, 2009 11:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
In general, I think he's alright.
But man, was he awful those last few weeks after Plax was gone.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Aug 19, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I criticize his iffy personnel decisions
Why did we see SO little of Boss last year? He is a tremendous weapon (literally) and I think he led the team in TD catches last season. So why not more of him in the open field? No TE screens?
And why did we see so little of Bradshaw?
You get my point; I really think that Gilbride is just a really piss-poor play caller who gets wrapped up in his own schemes and plans. He gets WAY too “cute” with some of his plays when he should just line up and plow through the other team.
I just think there’s an awful lot to criticize w/ Gilbride. yeah, he’s better than Hufnagel – but that’s like saying, “Awww…..George W Bush wasn’t so bad, I mean he’s better than Dick Cheney, right?” I just don’t think that we should let him off the hook so easily.
And I know for damn sure he isn’t “One of the best in the business”
by Cody K on Aug 19, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gilbride gets criticized
simply cuz he coaches in NY. People want Joe Girardi’s head right now and he has the team with the best record in baseball.
People have nothing better to do than complain, so its just par for the course in NY.
I am far from a Gilbride fan, but its really hard to argue with what he’s done as the OC. He doesn’t adjust, I don’t think he calls enough screens (maybe more will be called now with Bradshaw playing a bigger role…)
My frustration with Gilbride lies in this: How many times have we seen the Giants march down the field on their first possesion, either resulting in a TD or FG, only to see this sort of offense disappear from the rest of the game? Eli is perfection on these drives, the running game is unstoppable.
Maybe its the defense that adjusts (not unheard of ), maybe its failed execution (also not unheard of…), but it seems that Gilbride gets away from the original gameplan too early and they go to ball-control…(prevent offense?).
There’s too much talent on this team, last year and now, for this team to stop being aggressive for so long.
Do what Jerry Hairston do
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 19, 2009 11:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Common ground
Your frustration and mine RE: Gilbride are essentially the same. He’s too smart for his own good (or at least thinks he is) sometimes.
Don’t go away from what’s working. They were slaughtering the EAgles on the ground last year, and all of the sudden when they were going in for a back-breaking score in the 3rd quarter, he wanted to get nuts with the passing game.
I will never forgive him for the 2nd and 5 pass to Ward out wide. Jacobs had just gained 16 yards in 2 runs. If they just shove the ball down the Eagles throats on that drive, they win the game. It’s that simple.
by New York Sports Jerk on Aug 19, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yea.
i think they are worried about Jacobs health TOO much. I think that’s why you don’t see him out there as much as he should be.
But they have to realize that Jacobs, even when used sparingly, given his size and running style is gonna get banged up. They need to use him in situations like that MORE.
More than 3 plays in a row (like 5!) of Jacobs would be incredible. Its so simple…..
Do what Jerry Hairston do
by FreeBradshaw on Aug 19, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Can't give away the playbook in pre-season
Wow. Judging the impact of the play-calling as related to trying to “win” a preseason game? Ridiculous…
Besides, doesn’t anyone think we should hold back some of our “big plays” until the season starts? Also, when the 3rd stringers (and beyond) get in there I think the plays might get a little simpler, no?
by M. on Aug 19, 2009 11:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
you should expect no less
From the guy who handles James Bond.
Also yes, I am living at this page today. I gotta take a break.
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Aug 19, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why even have a comments section...???
…if you’re just going to tell people what they can and can’t comment on?
I’ll go on record right now with the following thoughts on Gilbride, and what you will and won’t hear from me this season…
1) I will never complain about running “too much.” If the other team stops the Giants on short-yardage runs, that’s on the offensive line, not on Gilbride. They literally can’t run the ball enough for me.
2) I will complain when the running game chews up 50-60 yards on a drive, and then Gilbride goes to a 5-wide formation and throws 3 passes in the red zone. Every time this happens, I will point it out, in the process calling for him to be fired, shot, stabbed, strangled or hacked to pieces with a rusty ax.
The Giants offense needs to be based around:
1) Power runs with Jacobs
2) Screens and draws with Bradshaw and the smaller WRs
3) 75 3rd down completions to Steve Smith
4) Occasional shots downfield to Hixon/Manningham/Barden
If Gilbride abides by those basic rules and doesn’t try to outsmart himself with his famous “well the run is working really well, so screw that, let’s chuck the ball around for a few minutes” strategy, they’ll be 12-4, and I’ll be downing Jager shots in early February in celebration of another SB win.
by New York Sports Jerk on Aug 19, 2009 11:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
it's all in the name
Don’t call yourself a jerk and expect anything even approaching fair treatment. even if you’re right.
by catsmeat84 on Aug 19, 2009 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
C'mon SJ
I actually agree with much of what you have written here. All I have asked if for people to hold the KG fire until regular season games, when the calls actually count for something.
by Ed Valentine on Aug 19, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i'm right with you
except I’d like to see the runs set up some playaction.
by queler on Aug 19, 2009 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Questioning the play calling in a pre season game is rediculous.
They play 80 players and need to get them all on tape with different situations. Then they are going to break down tape and grade based on performance. I would have liked to see the WR’s more. But with them getting a look at Woodson and Bomar, the wr’s didn’t get the looks they wanted. And why would the Giants be dumb enough to use their best plays for a pre season game when you have to play the same team later in the season? Some folks just complian for the joy of it…
by Lt56giants on Aug 19, 2009 11:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The only tape they got of Bomar
were hand-offs..He threw two passes!..not much film of to evaluate!
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
its not ridiculous.
insanity is defined as doing the same things over and over expecting different results…. from Q2 to Q4 the game plan was predictably run run pass punt. that is a mainstay criticism of this OC — face facts.
this year more dynamics are needed from the offense, and how are they expected to test it out from the get go if all they do is run them in 7 on 7’s in practice at 75% speed?
its just a poor decision to not try some new things for longer than 1 drive in a preseason game. yeah its meaningless — so take SOME FRIGGIN RISKS DAMNIT!!
by mattlawson on Aug 20, 2009 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the screen pass....
i’m a huge supporter of the screen pass….
if you’ll look at Ward’s stats last year he was catching the ball a lot more when we were winning games. (11-1). the last 3rd of the season he was averaging 0-1 reception a game…surprisingly we lost 3 of 4 (or something like that).
HOWEVER…in the philly game i’m pretty sure Ward had 5 catches…and we still lost.
by andiamo708 on Aug 19, 2009 11:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ummm.....
Ward is not and has never been quick…. he’s “shifty”.
How many catches did Bradshaw get in that game?
Now — how many superbowl rings does Bradshaw have again, and who was the leading rusher in that victory?
by mattlawson on Aug 20, 2009 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Again..It is Pre-season!
Alot of folks have made the point that they are not going to telegraph their regular season plans, that would be suicide. They’ll sprinkle in a test here and there to help construct it, that is it…I am more interested in seeing how our new players progress vs. showing the whole league the entire season gameplan..Monday, we didn’t see much from several of them..Hopefully soon..
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 1:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The offensive line coaches..
Bicknell and Flaherty should be the guys on our hot seat..the back-ups are stinking..What are they doing these guys??..Hoping for another healthy year for the starters?
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 1:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Call me crazy..
but i think this Giants team would work well with the Run n’ Shoot. The Run n’ Shoot is a good offense when you don’t have a single superstar receiver and theat’s exactly what the Giants are. They have a good O-Line and a prototype running back for the system in Jacobs. I’m just dreaming, but i wouldn’t mind seeing some concepts of that offense sprinkled into ours (mostly the screen passes)
President of the Ramses Barden Fan Club
by Hoyadestroya85 on Aug 19, 2009 1:41 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My Two Pennies
One of the biggest things that killed at the end of last year was how much we were getting blitzed, yet there was an absence of screen passes and quick slants. They showed an aptitude for it in this first preseason game. And most impressively, in my mind, was how well the pulling lineman picked up their blocks. The screen pass to Hixon was like a vicious adaptation of Swan Lake.
And something I couldn’t understand after our first loss to Philly last year was Coughlin’s statement on how he should have let Eli control the offense more. Yet the next week against Dallas, the 2 min offense was again absent from the scheme.
Those r my biggest knocks on Gilbride, but I have a funny feeling all will be right in the Land of Giants come season’s end. I’m chomping at the bit in anticipation of what I think will be not only defensive domination, but an offensive onslaught in Eli’s campaign for NFL MVP.
by YankeeDudeL on Aug 19, 2009 3:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I COMPLETELY AGREE
exactly my sentiments — they had teh tools to run a much more dynamic offense last year and just didnt… especially after plaxico’s absence.
the defense winding down and getting tired, that is primary.
but to not run more dump offs and screens as safety valves, quick slants, crosses with TE — all when the availability of the tools to do so were vividly apparent…. its sickening to think about how well the giants could have done offensively last year.
too conservative, too lackluster, too predicatable down the stretch — and too cute at the wrong times.
hey Kevin, do you remember that direct snap to WARD?!?! followed by a QB sneak? how about using your strengths and give it to Jacobs twice this year instead — you fool.
by mattlawson on Aug 20, 2009 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Very well said.
Def what I love about this site. Everyone watches the same games I do and see’s the same things my family and I have been screaming at the TV for years about.
by YankeeDudeL on Aug 22, 2009 2:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey Ed..
I just recently got back in touch with a friend of mine..We used to take our kids to camp to get a chance to meet the players, autographs for the kids etc.. He just informed me that you can hardly get near the players, you have to pay 10 bucks to park..When they walk out of a session they have their jerseys off, if your lucky to meet up with one it is hard to identify them, afterall we only see them mostly in helmets and jerseys..If you stray into the players parking lot, troopers chase you off…what kind of BS is that?!?..My friend’s Son is joining the armed forces next year to defend our freedom, he has been going to camp with his Dad since he was a little boy, as I always did with mine and they (the players) can’t take time to spend a minute or two with the fans that have paid for their salaries forever?..This makes me sick…What kind of camp are the Giants running here where that is concerned?..Are they becoming Germans (circa WII)?..This just plain sucks for us fans..Especially that brave young man (and I’m sure there are plenty of them)..Big Booo for my Big Blue!
by Bobbiblue on Aug 19, 2009 6:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















