When The Washington Post calls, I say 'yes'
For a while now The Washington Post, one of the best newspapers anywhere, has also been one of the best mainstream media Web sites when it comes to embracing the blogosphere.
The Post runs a terrific football blog it calls 'The League.' As part of the site, The Post has pulled together a panel of bloggers and other experts, including Archie Manning, former Redskins GM Bobby Beathard, Joe Theismann, Michael Wilbon and many others.
Somehow, yours truly has been given the privilege by The Post of being part of that panel. Recently, The Post asked me to contribute to a discussion about Eagles' team president Joe Banner saying "we have the best roster in the league.
I was thrilled to do so. Feel free to check it out. Here is some of what I had to say.
It seems all I have heard about the entire off-season is how great the 2009 Philadelphia Eagles will be. That is, when I haven't been hearing about Brett Favre, Plaxico Burress, Tom Brady or Michael Vick.
The Eagles are the flavor of the month -- the apple of everyone's eye and the paramour of the supposed experts. Well, I'm getting pretty tired of it. As are, I'm sure, Giants' fans everywhere.
Yes, the Eagles are good. Giants fans aren't stupid. They know that. As for Joe Banner's "we have the best roster in the league" comment? He is the team president, and he is supposed to believe that.
I don't have to buy it. And I am not going to.
The New York Giants have the best roster in the NFC. A deep, talented defense with a dominant defensive line that goes seven deep. A terrific offensive line. A Super Bowl winning quarterback. Depth and talent at running back. A slew of talented young -- if unproven -- receivers.
The Giants are the team to beat.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
All I got to say on the Eagles hype this season
is Eagles-9-6-1, lose in NFC Championship game to the CARDINALS….
…..next season they are the best team in the league or NFC at least.
Giants 10-6, beat the 3 best teams in the league that year and win the SB
….next season, most sites and “experts” say they are doomed to fail and are a fluke.
????
Congrats on the gig, Ed
I hope you end up seeing the G-Men in the Superbowl on press credentials!
You play to win the game!
If the Eagles president believes
their team has the best roster in the league, that means the blind fandom and baseless self-confidence that permeates the fanbase of that city has finally gone to the head at the very top of the organization. Scary. I look forward to this team making a Cowboys-like fall from grace by midseason, followed by calls for McNabbs head, Westbrook being great but injury prone, not enough wide receivers, blah blah blah.
ha
I look forward to this team making a Cowboys-like fall from grace by midseason, followed by calls for McNabbs head, Westbrook being great but injury prone, not enough wide receivers, blah blah blah.
I look forward to that happening after every Eagles loss :)
LOL
All this Eagles bandwagoning makes me sick like McNabb at a Super Bowl. They don’t even have the best roster in their state.
Congratulations!
Good job.
Weren’t the Cowboys supposed to be the “most talented team” around with a 100 pro bowlers + 1 Jessica Simpson on their roster?
Or was it the San Diego Chargers who every year the pundits pick to go to the Superbowl for some reason? Yet they only managed to go 8-8 in the lame AFC West?
Oy. I can’t wait for Sep 13.
by John W on Jul 29, 2009 10:09 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I love it...
Keep the cards and letters and comments coming…That is what helped fuel a Super Bowl championship!!…The Giants will eat all this hype up and spit it out on the field..Talk about motivation!!!..I am sick of hearing about the Eagles, Cowboys, Redskins…Then you hear about the Giants…All I can ask is “show me your rings”…Got any lately?
On another note...
I am also tired of all this “Reciever” nonsense…If the guys they have, and have drafted cannot catch the darn football, they wouldn’t be there!!…Heck Tyree can even catch the ball in his “earhole” remember?…and critics say the Giant SB victory was a “fluke”…For crying out loud they beat the undefeated New England Patriots!!!..These critiques I read are NUTS!!!.
Eagles lack depth
One key injury and the eagles won’t make the playoffs. No Westbrook or McNabb and they’re dead. I believe he Giants could lose a starting Defensive lineman, a starting running back and maybe even lose Eli and still make the playoffs.
wow, hold it right there
I believe he Giants could lose a starting Defensive lineman, a starting running back and maybe even lose Eli and still make the playoffs
losing a d-lineman last year in Osi, yes, you made the playoffs. congrats. however, you had Burress for 10 out of 16 (18 counting the post-season) regular season games… guess how many of those games you won… 9. 9 games you won due to Plax being there. guess how many games you won after Plax shot hisself. 4. you all won 4 out of your final 8 games because Plax wasn’t there to save Eli’s punk ass. Plaxico Burress IS the reason why Eli “lame-duck, pencil-neck” Manning was ever considered to be a “good” quarterback. Plax was Eli’s security blanket. When nothing else worked, Eli just hucked it high into the air, Plax got underneath it, and would proceed to out-jump entire teams to come down with it. Don’t get me wrong, Plax was a great receiver for you guys. But he coulda been great/even better on a lot of other NFL teams as well. Without Plax, you have no offense. Without Plax, you lose to the Eagles in the Divisional Round of the Playoffs.
you’re actually saying that if you lost your starting QB or RB you would make the playoffs?
to be honest, i kinda see where you’re coming from with the QB thing.. Eli really isnt that good. he relied on Plax to get him to this point in his career and, without him, he ain’t shit. so i guess DAVID CARR could come in and replace him if needed and you guys could still make the playoffs.
if Jacobs goes down tho, you guys are screwed. plain and simple. your offense would falter without a solid run game and, assuming bradshaw would step in to carry the load after a Jacobs injury, you would literally have to rely on your d to score for you. bradshaw is only good because Jacobs ruins opposing defenses by bashing their teeth in repeatedly. without Jacobs, opposing defenses would not wear down easily and bradshaw would not have the luck he has after Jacobs does his thing.
yea so if we lose mcnabb or westy we might not play well. however, McCoy is looking to be a young version of Westbrook aka Westbrook 2.0 who could fill in his spot very well cause he’s got a tight grasp on our playbook already. he might not be as productive as a rookie but he would fill in nicely. if we lose mcnabb, then yes, we’re probably fucked for a couple games or so until/if he gets back.. but honestly, how many teams would NOT be completely screwed if they lost their starting QB . . .
by RIP26_litodoin'work on Jul 29, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions
wow, hold on yourself
a couple of points for you:
1) leave the personal marks out of this. At no point on this blog has anyone done what you’ve done with manning to mcnabb. It’s not cool, it’s not funny and you just end up looking like a complete idiot and being dismissed as such
2) count the rings. How many does McNabb have again?
3) this is about ROSTERS, not individual players. this is a team game, remember? Can you honestly say that a team that went 9-6-1 has a better roster than a team that went 12-4?
alright
take out my personal feelings about eli and then what do you think? i feel its quite an accurate assessment. no team can lose a starting qb or rb and then expect to make the playoffs. d-line is another story.. you all are very deep there and you could maybe even lose two starters and still do very well. however, i feel we are deep at that position as well as our youth seems to be stepping up in big ways since our playoff run last year and they continue to show promise this offseason
by RIP26_litodoin'work on Jul 31, 2009 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions
Eagles ALWAYS have a great off-season
Their fans seriously contemplate a run at the Dolphins’ record every summer, and they do not have a sense of humor about it. This usually lasts until the third quarter of week 1, when they come crashing down to Earth, and they have even less sense of humor about that.
don't the Redskins hang banners
for winning the offseason?

they practically have an offseason dynasty going.
by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Jul 29, 2009 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions
As a Cowboys fan...
All I can say is you don’t want to be the team hyped before the season. Creates nothing but bad team pysche and unrealistic expectations.
As big Bill would say: “put away the annointing oil….”
But as a Cowboys fan (and I would think as a Giants fan) – I am more than happy for the mediots to annoint the fleagles.
"Where's Woody? - We need another Darren Woodson
they havent annointed us for shit
i recall maybe one so-called expert picking us to win the superbowl this year but most other “experts” are picking either the steelers to repeat or the pats to regain their winning form. aside from that, SI gave the g-men the nod over the eagles as well.
by RIP26_litodoin'work on Jul 31, 2009 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions

by 




















