Land of the Giants: Burress again
Let's take a look around the Inter-Google at stories making news about our New York Giants.
We have to start, of course, in a place I don't want to go. But, it can't be helped.
DA insisting on jail time for Burress
Former New York Giants wide receiver Plaxico Burress will apparently serve jail time for a gun charge from last November, if the Manhattan District Attorney gets his way. DA Robert Morgenthau told the New York Post that negotiations on a plea agreement with Burress fell apart earlier this year.
Morgenthau said he wanted Burress to serve two years in prison, but the receiver was only willing to accept one year of jail time. Burress shot himself in the thigh with a gun he owned at a Manhattan night club last November 29. A Florida permit for the weapon had expired. The mandatory minimum jail sentence for criminal possession of a weapon in New York is 3 1/2 years, but a plea agreement to a lesser charge could lead to a shorter term.
"We've always taken the position that he's going to have to go to jail, whether by trial or by plea," Morgenthau told the Post.
By the way, Bleacher Report is throwing out crazy rumors that the Giants would be interested in bringing Burress back. I have two questions.
1. Is the writer completely insane to bring this up?
2. Where did this rumor come from. It is totally irresponsible to throw out the "rumors are circulating" without any shred of evidence that that is the case, or without pointing to the source of the apparent "rumors."
Sadly, I am wondering if this is a case of 'creating' a wild rumor with no basis just to get attention. Which I have, unfortunately, just given the guy.
AP may also have a legal issue
The New York Post is hinting that Morgenthau may still be entertaining the idea of charging Antonio Pierce for helping Burress.
My take: Ugh! Another distraction the Giants don't need. If Morgenthau was going to do this, wouldn't he have done it a long time ago?
Let's move on to a few topics that should be more pleasant.
Scout.com is wondering how the Giants will manage to keep all the talented defensive linemen they have accumulated. As we saw in the roster prediction I just did, that's a good question.
The question here is not whether or not the Giants have eight linemen good enough to fill out the roster. It’s whether or not the usual eight DL roster spots will be enough to keep all the talent that Reese and Co. have assembled. There’s no doubt that come early September some of the toughest roster decisions are going to involve what to do on the D-line.
Yahoo! Sports sees good things for '09 Giants
The Giants really don’t have a weakness outside of the need for one of their receivers to emerge and be Burress-like. They know what their philosophy is, and they stick to it. Their early playoff exit after an 11-1 start left them unfulfilled after the stunning run to the NFL title a year earlier. If the defensive line is at least the sum of its parts, the Giants will have shored up a late-season hole. And if Manning can thrive without Burress and continue his maturation, the Giants should repeat as division champions and make a deep run in the playoffs.
Prediction: 12-4 (first, NFC East)
My take: Thank you, thank you, thank you.
ProFootballWeekly -- Beware of rookie receivers
Some of of this year's crop of rookie receivers will become stars. Most, though, will have to wait more than a year to do so. Don’t overvalue the first-year guys.
My take: As Giants fans, we know this. We just have to cross our fingers that first-round pick Hakeem Nicks is one of those guys who catches on quickly.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
wasn't one of the reasons
the Giants cut him was he refused a 30-day sentence? Honestly, if this true I think we have to reevaluate most of what we said about him. I don’t blame him either for not taking a two year deal. I don’t think there’s any way the DA this tough if he’s not a celebrity.
PLAX
My understanding is if he had accepted the original plea bargain he would be out of jail by now. Oh well.
As far as the current crop of WRs I’m not expecting them to be the next incarnation of “Air Coryell” I just want them to move the chains when necessary and catch the ball when it’s in their hands >cough-Hixon-cough<.
just so you know
everyone rips on hixon for dropping all these passes. in reality, besides the famous drop against the eagles that would have been a touchdown, he only dropped one other pass all year. so one dropped pass pretty much ruined his reputation
AP
I wouldn’t be surprised if the DA was floating the idea of charging Pierce to make him more willing to testify against Plax should things actually go to trial.
My advice
Is to stop torturing yourself and stay here.
by Ed Valentine on Jul 27, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions
re: AP......The DA is a Jet fan...
"18-1, write that book! ! "
by SB42 Living-a-Dream on Jul 27, 2009 5:52 PM EDT reply actions
Maurice Evans and Tolefson
could be nice rotation players on damn near any team playing a 4-3, maybe even some 3-4 ones that change their look every now and then.
Id hate to see Evans go before he even plays a down, cuz I think that he might even be a Jon Randle type of undrafted player….but there’s just no room with all the vets.
Tolefson was a nice backup, but with everyone back its just not needed.
Domenik Hixon
Why are you all so down on the guy? He is THE BEST reciever on our roster right now, that includes Steve Smith, Hixon is better than all of them. Hixon is the #1 reciever right now, and i think he could do a better job than Plaxico did. Hixon is faster, and much more tougher than Burress was, and isn’t afraid to go across the middle. And what people seem to forget is that Hixon was injured at the end of last season. Steve Smith doesn’t have the speed or the size to be #1 reciever. Hakeem Nicks, along with the other recievers on the roster are too inexperenced to be #1’s or #2’s. If anybody’s going to loose their job halfway through the season, its going to be Steve Smith, to Hakeem Nicks if he shows enough flashes, seeing as he is much more athetically gifted than Smith is. Steve smith is better suited as the slot reciever, possesion reciever. As for Hixon, like Strahan said, the guy is a buddiing star. I will gurantee you the guy will have a hell of a season, but probably won’t make the Pro Bowl, because of the other recievers in the confrence (Fitzgerald, Boldin, Jennings, White, etc) I project (if not injuries) 80-90 catches, 1,100-1,200 yards, and 5-7 TD’s… I based this projection on how the guy is built. Like i said earlier, Hixon is faster than Burress, so he’ll be able to get behind opponets better than Burress did, and he is willing to go across the middle and catch balls underneath the coverage; so he’ll have more oppurtunities to have the ball in his hands than Burress did (more catches) The down side of this is that he is more prone to injuries than Burress ever was so he’ll have to be careful not to overdue it. But the guy is going to be good
....
I think Bye, Dawk was right on this.
If Hixon gets that many catches it will not only mean the Giants are passing too much it will also mean they aren’t spreading the ball around, which is the best way for Eli to QB.
He COULD get that, but Id rather see him not. Football TEAM. I don’t care who leads the league in what, as long as the Giants win games.
by FreeBradshaw on Jul 28, 2009 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions

by 






























