Osi vs. Justin: Who ya got?
![]() |
![]() |
| Osi Umenyiora | Justin Tuck |
OK, Big Blue View Nation, let's put up our dukes and get down to it. On and off throughout the off-season the subject of which defensive end -- Osi Umenyiora or Justin Tuck is better -- has come up. So, let's have at it.
Who ya got? Are you siding with the Chief? That, of course, would be Umenyiora, coming back from a year away due to injury to attempt to re-claim his throne Or, are you taking Tuck, the young stalwart who ascended to the mountaintop in Osi's absence?
There is no doubt which side of this argument I am on. I am taking Tuck, and I'm not hesitating for even a second. I have been saying for two seasons that Tuck is the better player, and I am not changing my stance now.
Before I go through all of my reasoning, since this is a fight we have to list all of the relevant details. So, we go to the Tale of the Tape, as it may be.
Tale of the Tape
Osi Umenyiora
Age: 27
Size: 6-foot-3, 261 pounds
Years Pro: 5
Career Sacks: 41.5
Career Tackles: 297
Pro Bowls: 2
All Pro: 1
Justin Tuck
Age: 26
Size: 6-foot-5, 274 pounds
Years Pro: 4
Career Sacks: 23
Career Tackles: 214
Pro Bowls: 1
All Pro: 1
Now, let's get to the meat of the argument.
Let me start with my feelings about Osi. I love the guy, and I know how much he can bring to the table if he is fully healthy and returns to the elite level he once played at.
But, and this is the big but and the place where I know I am about to get myself in trouble with some of you. Here's the thing. The truth is Osi has not been a great player since the 2005 season.
OK, OK. Are you done screaming at me, throwing things at the monitor and swearing you will never read anything I write ever again? Good. Now go look at the numbers -- they back me up.
In 2005, Umenyiora had a monster season with career-bests in both sacks (14.5) and tackles (92, an average of of nearly six per game).
In 2006, he played just 11 games due to an injury. He compiled just six sacks, meaning he was on pace for about 8, and just 38 tackles (barely more than 3 per game).
In 2007, he did have 13 sacks. If you recall, though, (and I'm sure you do) six of those came in one game against overmatched Eagles rookie Winston Justice. That means in the other 15 games he had just a very pedestrian six sacks. Also, he had just 64 tackles that season.
You can blame it on injuries, if you want. To be fair I am certain his troublesome knee has had something to do with it. The reality is, though, that since 2005 Osi has had one -- yes, one -- great game. The rest of the time he has been very mediocre or not in the lineup at all.
In '07, when he played every game, Umenyiora tended to disappear for long stretches. He had two games where he did not even register a tackle, and went through a five-game stretch where he compiled just one sack and 11 measly tackles (combining solo tackles and assists).
I really, really hope that we see the 2005 version of Umenyiora in 2009. Otherwise, we will be seeing a guy who has a super star reputation, but -- other than that one season -- has not posted super star performance.
Now, let me move on to talking about Tuck.
In four seasons -- really only three since he played just six games in 2006, mostly on special teams -- the Notre Dame grad has become one of the best defensive ends in the sport. In each of the past two seasons, he has made 82 tackles (a number Umenyiora has only surpassed once). He has 22 sacks in those two seasons.
I maintain that, even in 2007 when Tuck was listed as the backup and playing fewer snaps that Umenyiora or Michael Strahan, that he was the best defensive end the Giants had. Tuck had 10 sacks and 82 tackles in 2007, compared to Osi's 13 and 64 -- thus, making more plays while being on the field less often. For good measure, Strahan's numbers that season were 9 sacks and 57 tackles.
I would also argue that Tuck's versatility in being able to move around to all the different spots on the line adds to his value, as does the fact that during the past two seasons he has shown tremendous consistency. He never had a game in 2008 where he did not make at least two solo tackles, and he had four games with more than one sack. Aside from his awesome six-sack game in 2007, Umenyiora had one two-sack game in 2006 and one two-sack game in 2007. That's it.
I think it's impossible to argue that Tuck is not the more productive of the two players at this point in their careers. It seems to me that Osi, right now, needs to prove his performance can still match his reputation. Tuck, on the other hand, is just making his reputation.
That said, I would love to see both guys post career years in 2009.
0 recs |
47 comments
|
Comments
Depends on how you qualify it
I say Osi is still better right now (based off of career stats), BUT I think Tuck will prove to be the superior DE.
by brisulph on Jun 15, 2009 7:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How?
I don’t see how the stats justify the argument that Osi is better. To me, they show that Tuck is a better run defender, and a more consistent player. Osi can be brilliant, but he can also disappear. Believe me, though, I want Osi to prove he is still the dominant player of 2005. If he is truly healthy, he just might.
by Ed Valentine on Jun 15, 2009 8:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tuck
just cuz he can play DT.
Osi’s fast and unlike a lot of speed guys, he’s good against the run too, mainly cuz he sheds blocks and runs down the ball carrier.
Its really not by a whole lot either. But Tuck is better, cuz he’s nearly as fast but a whole lot bigger.
Im just gonna like watching what these 2 do together on the field again. And Kiwi will join them on 3rd down too. Sucks to be the other team.
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 15, 2009 7:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Good point
Ed you make a very convincing argument as to why Tuck is a better DE at this point and I’m going to have to agree with you. Tuck is a beast plain and simple! But I know we are ALL hoping that both of these guys have monster years for all of our sakes!
LETS GO GMEN
by I_Formation27 on Jun 15, 2009 7:55 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I want to see Osi prove that he is still an elite player. I think he will.
by Ed Valentine on Jun 15, 2009 8:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I saw both of them at the Cotto fight Saturday night, and in person the size difference does not seem like much. That being said, I have to go with Tuck, just because he did it solo last year where as Osi did it with Strahan taking up some of the double teams. Tuck also seems more athletic and dosent disappear for stretches the way Osi does from time to time.
Either way, Im glad they are on my team.
by ryanwk628 on Jun 15, 2009 8:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Double teams
That’s a really good point. Osi has never consistently faced the double team. Tuck faced it all the time last season, and still put up great numbers. I’m anxious to see which guy teams double when the season starts. I am almost certain that will be Tuck.
by Ed Valentine on Jun 15, 2009 8:23 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can't wait to see who they double
cuz that means single blocking for Osi and/or Kiwi or Canty (just to collapse the pocket would be enought for me).
Then you got Clint Sintim, who may be a bit smaller than these DE’s, but he liked to eat QB in college. Im anxious to see if that 3rd down D-Line has all 5 of Kiwi, Tuck, Canty, Osi and Sintim all charging at the poor QB.
by FreeBradshaw on Jun 15, 2009 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly, WHO, are they going to double?
The Giants have no less than 7 DL that could start for 95% (thinking DT’s, or 100%) of the teams in the NFL. Barring no setbacks to Cofield or Robbins, if i didn’t know any better, this unit will be deeper or better than the 2007 unit. And that was filthy! But, i’m only talking about the linemen. If you factor in LB’s and the ocassional DB blitz, someones going to have free shots, and i’m not talking about cheap shots either! Pressure, hurries or the actual sack itself!
I might feel a tad sorry for that poor opposing QB if his OL don’t bring their A game. What’s the record for team sacks in a game?
I can’t wait. BTW, i voted for Tuck! Nice pitch Ed, lol!
by Hootman on Jun 15, 2009 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hear you
The guys that are on Tuck’s side I hear your points and agree he is indeed a great player however I have to go with Osi…
The argument on here was Tuck did better in 2007 than Osi while being on the field less (that is the key here) he wasn’t an every down player, so he didn’t wear down as easily. If you remember 6-7 of Tuck’s sacks that year came from him being a nose guard or DT not from the DE spot!!!!!
Secondly, last year Tuck was an evey down player and he struggled the past 4-5 games with a leg injury, back issues etc… So the argument I make is this. Tuck has yet to play an entire season 100% healthy (2007 he was a sub playing DE,DT,NG) last year he was a starter and while he did play the entire year he was injured. So I look at like this Osi has played 3-4 years 100% healthy and has been there every year when you needed him! Tuck has yet to play entire year either because of injury or being a sub so the better player is a no brainer. OSI!! I want someone who will be there every game healthy and OSI has done this year after year for our Giants, Tuck is a good player but to be great you have to do it every year as a starter and that has yet to happen. Osi has 41.5 sacks in 6 years and Tuck has 23 in 4 years they seem to be pretty even but OSi in my opinon has done it longer, healthier and been a starter for 5 years, I guess we have to see when Tuck can finish a season to start comparing him…
by LT56 on Jun 15, 2009 8:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice spin job
But, that’s exactly what it is. Your heart wants Osi to be better. No way can you spin the fact that Tuck made more plays in fewer snaps into something that is a point in Osi’s favor. It meant Tuck was more productive. The health argument is also spin. Tuck was beat up and hurting at the end of last season but continued to make plays despite being double-teamed. Osi has done it longer, but my argument is about who is the better player TODAY. That’s Tuck.
by Ed Valentine on Jun 15, 2009 8:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Osi
Okay, then I’m taking the sentimental favorite: Osi.
Disclaimer: I LOVE both of these players. I think they’re both not only physical beasts and great players but company men and great for morale & team.
I’m not taking the statistical approach, I’m taking what I’ve seen and a broader sense of value to the team. I’d agree that Tuck is the physically superior athlete. He’s probably quicker. He probably has more transcendent natural talent. That said, I think for this year at least, Osi will be more valuable to the team. If anyhing he’s probably only a shade behind Tuck athletically, but I get the sense he also has the aspect of a field general and a team leader.
The real questions, I think, will be: 1.) How much will the missed year affect Osi? (i.e. has he “lost a step”) 2. Will Tuck continue to take major strides forward in terms of how he impacts a game?
If both of those questions go Tuck’s way, then yeah, he’ll be the more valuable player on the field. In fact, I’m talking myself out of taking OU. I’ve just got my fingers crossed for Osi to be as great as he can be, which I think makes him a hair more valuable. (p.s. what a great argument to be having!)
I think of the example of Jason Varitek. For christ’s sake it seems like he’s hitting .073 over the last few years. But his value to the team is immense, and I think if the sox traded him for Posada, they’d lose at least ten more games over the course of the year despite the gained offense.
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Jun 15, 2009 10:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Okay, fine, Tuck
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Jun 15, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont know if anyone considered it
but Osi is on 5 hour energy now, therefore the superior player
![]()
by ryanwk628 on Jun 15, 2009 11:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think
you could make an argument that Osi a better pass rusher, but it is hard to dispute that Tuck is the better overall player. He just always seems to dominate his area of the line, whether at tackle or end.
by P. Gibbons on Jun 15, 2009 11:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
…with the way you put it… I think Osi is faster and a better pure pass rusher and definitely better against the run than most of the other speed rushers out there (yeah, Julius Peppers, I’m lookin at you), but as many have said, Tuck’s versatility and 2-way skills make him the better overall player.
All that being said, I’m damn happy to have them as my bookend DE’s. Hopefully some friendly competition between them will drive them both to higher standing.
by TNYFBG on Jun 15, 2009 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A vote for Osi
I like how Osi was the beneficiary of having Strahan on the other side, but somehow Tuck didn’t benefit from playing on the same line with both of those players? I think Tuck helped to expose a unique weakness of most offensive lines: Guards aren’t used to blocking pass rushers. Warren Sapp made a career from that. And although Tuck was playing the DT position for a year, let’s not kid ourselves, he was there primarily as a pass rusher, so let’s not overstate his run stopping capabilities. I still feel Osi is the better football player, because when he is healthy he is capable of getting six sacks in a single game, or 14.5 in a single season. Until proven otherwise, I believe Osi is capable of doing that again.
by rzor on Jun 15, 2009 11:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Osi never played without Strahan
last year Tuck played without Strahan AND Osi and had an all-pro year.
by cjmulrain on Jun 15, 2009 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of Strahan
Osi had more sacks than the gap-toothed wonder each of the last four years they played together. Could we disagree who was better between those two?
by rzor on Jun 15, 2009 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Osi or Strahan
All you have to do is look at how offensive coordinators tried to block the Giants. Even in his final season Strahan got the double teams and Osi was blocked one-on-one. You can argue numbers all you want there, but that tells you who opposing teams feared more.
by Ed Valentine on Jun 15, 2009 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
Whomever gets the double team, that’s who pro-caliber D.C.’s think is the better player! This question will def. be answered this year, and the answer will not be who gets the state but who gets the dbl-team.
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Jun 15, 2009 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that's why I go with Tuck
Osi never got double teams b/c Strahan was there. Last year Osi probably would have gotten the double teams if he was healthy, but he was out so it was Tuck getting them, and he still put up awesome numbers. I love Osi, but I just think Tuck is a more complete player.
Either way, can we all agree that we’ve been pretty damn lucky when it comes to DE’s? I mean, we just got to watch one of the top 3 DE’s of all time for 15 years, and when he retires we’re having a debate about who our best DE is and not even mentioning a guy who had 51 tackles and 8 sacks last year.
by cjmulrain on Jun 15, 2009 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I can agree
that I’m more excited to see what this defense can do than I have been in a long time. I really think this could be a special kind of team, perhaps even history-making.
by rzor on Jun 15, 2009 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wish there was a stat for breaking up screens...
I have a feeling that strahan was one of the best in the league at this his last couple of years. His physical abilities declined a little, but he more than made up for it with his experience and intelligence.
by P. Gibbons on Jun 15, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
tuck was Strahan's backup
during the Super Bowl run
by queler on Jun 15, 2009 1:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too close to call
I think this one is too close to call at this time. They’re both excellent players. Ed’s analysis of the statistics is fair, but may not tell the whole story. For example, tackle totals can be misleading unless you know how many plays the opponents ran toward each side of the line, or how often a double team was used on the running play. I agree that Tuck’s success in 2007 was partly a function of him getting less snaps and being fresher. Also as pointed out above he was speed rushing against interior lineman with pro bowl ends on the outside drawing a lot of attention much of the time. And don’t forget, Tuck was still relatively unproven that year too, so nobody was really game planning for him. Last year without Strahan and Osi, he played admirably, but if I recall correctly he got most of his sacks in the first half of the season, and his production dropped after opposing teams started consistently double teaming him. By the end of the season he was completely out of gas. That’s why the return of Osi and the Canty and Bernard signings were so important. Assuming both stay healthy, 2009 ought to give us a better read, and I agree that whoever draws the most double teams ought to be considered the better player regardless of sack or tackle totals.
by Tucker Fredrickson on Jun 15, 2009 12:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
your post made me think of something
that goes in Osi’s favor, I think. Strahan was a left end, which means Osi was the right end, which means Osi was going up against other teams left tackles, who are generally the best o-lineman on a team. So while Strahan was drawing the double teams, Osi was matched up one on one with guys like Steve Hutchinson. Tuck last year (IIRC) was also playing left end. I hadn’t thought of that. I don’t think it makes up the advantage Tuck has in the stats dep’t, and I think a double team is usually tougher than one left tackle, but it’s maybe something to keep in mind.
by cjmulrain on Jun 15, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's an excellent point
And I agree with you 100%. It just goes to show how complicated it is to analyze performance of defensive football players in a game as complicated as football. There are so few measurable statistics, and even those few require so much context that subjective impressions make a difference when you are trying to differentiate players that are relatively close in ability. If I had to vote now, I’m leaning ever so slightly in Tuck’s favor, but I’ll reserve judgment until we see what happens this year.
by Tucker Fredrickson on Jun 15, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're biased.
I mean, “Tuck” is right in your name! Would we listen if someone called “Umenyiorady Johnson” picked Osi? We’re onto you TF
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Jun 15, 2009 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
This one was easy for me..
Tuck.. think about this though: our two starting defensive ends were picked outside the top 50 and the G-Men were chided for picking Osi so early.. ridiculous. Tuck was a third round pick. Justin Tuck may be the most versatile defensive player in the league. I have no doubt that he could start at defensive tackle in a tampa 2, be an end in a 3-4 (cue 57), an end in the 4-3 and an outside linebacker in the 3-4 as well. I remember him saying that he lined up at every position except safety in ’07.
President of the Ramses Barden Fan Club
by Hoyadestroya85 on Jun 15, 2009 4:23 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
by the way
isn’t that picture of Osi kneeling over Bledsoe just bad ass
President of the Ramses Barden Fan Club
by Hoyadestroya85 on Jun 15, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
that was my facebook & my SBN profile picture for a long time
definitely one of my favorite pics. He reminds me of Batman kneeling over a criminal he just brought down.
by cjmulrain on Jun 15, 2009 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you mean
after the phantom punch?
President of the Ramses Barden Fan Club
by Hoyadestroya85 on Jun 16, 2009 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tuck
Because he appears to be more versatile plus Osi is coming off an injury. Having two good DE is a problem I like to have.
by John W on Jun 15, 2009 6:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Problem?
It’s not a problem at all. It’s an awesome weapon, no matter which side of this debate you are on.
by Ed Valentine on Jun 15, 2009 6:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If I had to take just one of them
it would be Tuck….
by giant fan since 57 on Jun 15, 2009 7:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tuck
because i love Notre Dame football. it’s the same reason why Mark Bavaro is the best tight end ever, ever.
by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Jun 15, 2009 7:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
ugh..
with very few exceptions.. Nothing good has ever come out of Notre Dame.
President of the Ramses Barden Fan Club
by Hoyadestroya85 on Jun 15, 2009 9:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I like both of them
most of the best linemen in the NFL play left tackle – at least that is what is assumed – Osi goes up against them every week – if Tuck and Osi switched positions Tuck would still get doubled on the left side and be more of a force and put up more numbers – I think Osi would put up the same numbers on the other side – the fact that Tuck can go anywhere on the line and be effective – pretty much dominate – makes him the better lineman and overall player
by Tom_and_Jerry on Jun 15, 2009 8:59 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jerome McDougal
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Jun 16, 2009 2:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Going with Tuck on this one.
Both are great, don’t get me wrong, but I think a lot of Osi’s lure comes from that monster game against Philly. Delete that game and you have to ask if Osi makes the Pro Bowl that year. With a 6 sack game under his belt, you would have to think he would have threatened Stray’s sack record. This combination is going to be great. We’ve got the best bookends in football and the guy on deck is not too bad (that’s why his name is always coming up in trade talks).
by njgiant on Jun 16, 2009 8:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I go with Tuck, but...
I’ll be quick!!!
Tuck is a more complete DE. Osi only has a speed advantage over him, and that’s not a big advantage cuz for his size, Tuck has great speed.
Osi has had great numbers up to now. But these came while Strahan was being doubled on the other side. Osi had to step in and be the man for the first time last season and injury changed that…
Tuck stepped in with a lot less attention early on and made a great impact. Then teams had to consider him more in their preparation and they did.
I think the Giants will have a year similar to the one they had when they won the superbowl, at least defensively.
Each will benefit from the presence and production of the other…
by Kensay on Jun 16, 2009 1:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I went with osi...
but after hearing the arguments here i have been converted to Tuck. Great discusssion and another reason why BBV is the best giants blog ever.
by ChuckyofNorris on Jun 16, 2009 8:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 























