If that does happen then it will be official, Bud Selig has secretly become the commissioner of the NFL.

for a regular season game, now they want the SB there? At least if they said Mexico City or something like that, at least they are on the same continent. Maybe Puerto Rico or something? I don’t know, anything is better than playing in that crap agan.

As for Farve, I think he would be fine going to the Vikings. I would be forced to turn off ESPN cuz over this summer every story would be either Farve’s comback or a new story on how A-Rod did roids in the womb, by Selena Roberts…

The offseason leading up to this will be more of the joke. Last year was incredibly annoying with all the Farve coverage.

But as for the actual football, he DID play for the Jets, the one of the worst franchises in the NFL. The Vikings at least have a good team and KNOW that they are handing the ball off to AD and Chester Taylor. It could work.

I hate the idea of the super bowl going to london, too…. but hey, it might be a great excuse for us to visit there as it really is a fun city. I wonder how confused people will be over there when they hear the National “Football” League is hosting the championship there. May leave some brits a little confused as to why they paid a couple hundred bucks to see the wrong sport!

Anyways, i don’t forsee this happening. I doubt London would want to fork over very much money for this sport unless they had a big fan base (which they don’t).

As for the peter king article… i think he might have blown up our spot! You guys had a great draft day too so don’t stress it too hard… just one man’s opinion.

I am afraid to think of what will become of the NFL when he’s in his 60s (Best of 7 Super Bowls, doubleheaders?). I haven’t found a single person, from the vast blogosphere to the opinion shows on ESPN, who like this idea. For Goodell to even consider this he must be banking on everyone grudgingly accepting this. Unfortunately, if a Super Bowl was held in London I wouldn’t have it in me to boycott, I’d have to watch it like I have every other Super Bowl.

Can you imagine the Super Bowl being played on that awful “pitch” the Giants-Dolphins game was played on?

I’m not sure which is a worse idea, playing the championship games at neutral sites, or this.

of the circle jerk surrounding the eagles draft.. yes it looks good on paper.. but so did the Cowboys draft last year..

they should bring to Australia. that way ill get to see it live! If Giants go all the way again it will be just awesome

i dont really care where the game is played. londen wouldnt affect me or bother e much. its not like im getting a ticket either way. i dont support the idea but eh, whatever. i like the idea of mexico or the carribean better too but they dont have the facilaties that europe (and probably australia) does.

I don’t understand the NFL’s fascination with playing games overseas. Europeans don’t play football, don’t like football and have plenty of their own sports to play, (rugby, soccer, etc.). NFL Europe failed. If the NFL thinks it will expand overseas, Goodell is smoking crack. We don’t even have a franchise in LA. Football is an American sport, always will be. Its not like basketball that can relatively easily translate to other countries. The NFL should be concentrating on saving small franchises from moving, like the Bills and getting a rookie salary cap.

“normal fans” have been frozen out of the Super Bowl for many many years.