Giants have plenty of options draft weekend
This week has been one of intrigue. It is impossible really to tell what will happen this week and the upcoming draft day. When the Giants said "adios" to Plaxico Burress, there really started to be more questions than answers, and those questions that are yet to be answered will most likely not be answered until at least the 7th pick in the draft.
The good news is that Tom Cable is looking to rebuild...a lot. This may allow the Giants to throw a good number of picks his way so that they could jump on the much heralded young receiver, Jeremy Maclin. A lot in his scouting report says the guy may even be a safer bet for the Giants than the other guy. However, as the prevous links state, Al Davis rarely moves down in the draft...he brings his team down, instead (ouch). Well, besides that point, there might be a possibility of this but the Giants would probably have to pay a king's ransom for it and it may not be seen as worth it.
Of course, we've heard rumors about the Giants trading for either Chad Ochocinco, Braylon Edwards, or Anquan Boldin by draft day. So far, nothing's happened (or we wouldn't be talking about it) but I would like to briefly hit on these options.
First of all, everyone has ragged on the Giants for even considering Chad 8-5. This all may be moot but it must be noted that the receiver does not have a criminal record (a plus at this point), is a big time player, and does not put up a fuss if he doesn't get the ball. He consistently draws double coverage (partly why T.J. was able to get the big deal in the first place at the age of 32) which is what the Giants need to open up the running game, and at his age (31) he is still a versatile play maker. While he is a prankster, Coughlin would gladly put up with that so long as the guy shows up on time and is respectful to his coaching staff and teammates (we've heard of no problems there in Cincinnati).
Braylon Edwards...let's be honest, he's dropped a lot of perfectly catchable balls. But unlike Johnson, he's got plenty of prime years ahead of him and if we can't look at it any other way, he's an upgrade over Amani Toomer (who also had cement hands on and off in his career). He also is a silky smooth route runner who can quickly break away from the second level; he requires press, bump and run coverage; and he often requires a safety to roll coverage over the top. This would be ideal for the Giants system. Just like the Raiders' option, it might look too rich for the Giants but with Cleveland picking fourth and Crabtree most likely there for the taking, it may be a win-win for the Jints and the new-look Browns staff.
Of course, we cannot overlook the idea of Boldin trading in his red sweater for a nice shade of blue but this seems least likely. While most Giants fans are licking their chops to have him join Big Blue, according to most articles, he might be too expensive (both in draft picks and in a contract) for the Giants to be willing to trade for him. Not only this, but with rumors about a lingering hip problem, he may not have as many prime years of playing time ahead of him to outlive his contract. He's also not a prototypical, "stretch the field" #1, with most of his potential coming from yards after the catch. This would lead to dump-offs, screens, and leading plays where defenders will have him play in front of him. This is not what the Giants are looking for when/if they trade for a WR.
Lastly, the Giants may choose not to address the WR position with the 1st round pick, and instead throw it at a still available ILB/OLB. These guys are hoping on that. Who could blame them? Besides, Smith has been Mr. Clutch, and if Hixon didn't drop what could've been a wide open TD pass in an extremely poorly played game (Hixon aside) against Philadelphia, Giants fans might be, instead, thinking of this flashback as his future painted in blue.
Thankfully, we will see soon, and the questions we've all been pondering will be answered. Until then, what do you think?
FanPosts are written by community members. This is simply a way for community members to express opinions too long to be contained in a comment.
0 recs |
8 comments
Comments
None of the above really
what if there’s someone know one’s talking about that they are after?? ooooooooo….
by FreeBradshaw on Apr 21, 2009 10:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Of the choices above I’d have to say get Braylon Edwards.
Boldin has a higher price tag, doesn’t stretch the field and to me honestly seems like a more physical version of Steve Smith.
I see no point in packaging a bunch of picks to move up to take a rookie receiver and if they stay put and keep all their draft picks I just can’t see all those picks making the team. After free agency they only have a few number of roster spots available for guys who are actually going to make the team and contribute. There just aren’t a lot off holes.
by SHATNER1234 on Apr 21, 2009 11:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice Post
I hope the Braylon Option becomes a reality. It would be giving up a lot (especially with the diamond mining Reese has done in late draft rounds.) But doesn’t anyone else agree that the Giants are built to win now?
Since we have the 29th pick, it’s almost like we’d be giving a 2,4 & 6 for him. And you could make an argument that we are buying low on Braylon because if he had a repeat ‘07 performance last year we wouldn’t even be having this conversation. He would be untouchable.
I’m sure his star rose too fast and Braylon got distracted by the bright lights. But last year had to humble him and hopefully we would catch him on a huge rebound year. Not only that but look at the O-Line protection Eli gets. That kind of time alone will allow Braylon time to stretch the field and make some big plays. He’s young, proven, and doesn’t get in trouble off the field.
Go get him.
by edzilla on Apr 22, 2009 9:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think we could get Edwards cheaper than that
But I supposes surrendering the 29th pick wouldnt be that bad when you have 2 seconds
Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.
by bren on Apr 22, 2009 11:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You might be right bren,
and if so we’d jump on that, but knowing that they went back and forth with Kiwanuka, Smith, and Hixon, I’d rather pay a pick (even our first) than get rid of a proven player in the Giants program. We’re right there, we just need a guy like Edwards to get us over the top.
I just can’t wait to see the Giants trade some 4th and 5th rd. picks to move up in the later rounds to get those “under the radar” studs. If they’re there, JR will find ’em!
In Reese We Trust
by jmark82 on Apr 22, 2009 12:43 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is why I guess the first rounder is not that big a deal to trade
If they have to give up a 1st and 5th for Braylon, and then maybe do something like swap the Giants last 2nd for the Browns third rounder (its only a few spots), then Im fine with theat.
I like having all these picks cuz like jmark says, it gives Reese flexibility in the later rounds to trade up for someone who is falling or that he feels is a need to move up and grab.
But Hixon and Smith NEED to stay. If no deal gets done because the Browns insist on Hixon or Smith or Kiwi, F em. I could care less cuz I really DO NOT think that Edwards is a need, he is a luxury to add to our stable of WR.
by FreeBradshaw on Apr 22, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If...
…this poll was the truth we would be crazy to not trade a 2nd and a 5th fro Chad 85. We would still have a 1st, 2nd, and two 3rd’s to make moves and get another young receiver like Hayward-Bey. We have 2 receivers to replace…
by kingofatlanta on Apr 22, 2009 10:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Id go for that
but I don’t think the Bengals are going to trade him.
by FreeBradshaw on Apr 22, 2009 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















