Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: PHOTOS: Mike Moser's Dunk Face Is Spectacular

New York Giants notes: Jacobs' knee, Umenyiora's future

One thing is for sure. The New York Giants' humiliating loss Sunday, and the fact that they are out of the playoffs for the first time in five years, means there is no shortage of things to talk about.

So, let's get started.

In the midst of discussing his disappointment over Sunday's loss to Carolina, head coach Tom Coughlin was asked about the health of running back Brandon Jacobs, who had just one yard on six carries Sunday.

Coughlin let it be known that the big fella came out of the game with a swollen knee, and that the knee is an injury Jacobs has been battling all season.

"He has had some issues along the way that he has had to deal with," is all Coughlin would say about it.

We should have known all along that Jacobs has not been right. Mich like Rich Seubert, who played much of the season with a damaged shoulder, Jacobs has not been on the injury report. His 3.7 yards per carry average, after two seasons of averaging 4.9 per carry, tell you he has not been the same, though.

The questions the Giants have to answer in regards to Jacobs are obvious, but they are not easy. Will he ever again be the back the Giants relied on to set the tone for them offensively in 2007 and 2008? Or, has he begun to break down? With next season being the sixth of his career, have we already seen the best he has to offer? And can the Giants depend on him to be their featured back in 2010 and beyond?

As of today, I am not sure there is a concrete answer to those questions.

Star-divide

About Osi

The Osi Umenyiora question is another that has arisen since Osi's post-game outburst Sunday night. Coughlin addressed Osi's unhappiness during his Monday press conference.

"I am familiar with what he said and he is very much in our plans. I would just tell you that he is a very, very important asset to our team and just leave it at that," Coughlin said. 

Pro Football Talk's Mike Florio believes that what it is really about for Umenyiora is money, which he has felt for years he is not getting enough of from the Giants.

We're told that the team has no desire to move Umenyiora, and that the franchise believes his remarks represent the latest effort to get the new contract that he has coveted since not long after he signed a long-term deal in late 2005 and then later hired agent Tony Agnone, who also represented Michael Strahan.

But what has Umenyiora done since racking up 14.5 sacks in 2005? Setting aside the night that Umenyiora treated Winston Justice like his own personal turnstile, Osi is a single-digit guy -- hardly the dominant presence that he thinks he is.

So now he thinks he'll get paid by declaring that the team doesn't want him. With an uncapped year looming, it's an interesting approach.

But with Umenyiora slated to earn a base salary of only $3.1 million in 2010, the Giants have no reason to let him walk -- and his performance has given them no reason to rip up the last three years of his deal.

I don't know if Florio is right about Osi's desire for a bigger paycheck. I do know he is right about his productivity. It is the same stance I have had in regard to Umenyiora for years now. He is not nearly as good as he believes he is.

Other Stuff

  • You can forget all that wishful thinking about John Fox getting fired by Carolina, replacing Bill Sheridan as Giants' defensive coordinator and becoming the team's head-coach-in-waiting. The Panthers want to keep him.
  • Here is a musical look at the 2009 Giants' season. I think it's a little harsh in spots, but I think many of you will enjoy it.
  • Daily News columnist Tim Smith says the 2009 failure proves that the 2007 Super Bowl was a fluke. I think that's nonsense. Even if it isn't, though, I don't really care. The Giants won in 2007, no one can ever take that away, and it was one of the highlights of my life as a sports fan. Fluke or not.
  • Matt Mosley lists NFC East Pro Bowl possibilities. Pretty revealing that not one Giants defensive player even gets consideration.

Comment 83 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

First up, that Daily News article by Smith is one of the most asinine things I have read about the Giants in the past five or so years. Including Lupica..

Osi’s comments probably are about money. When you’re a legend in your own mind what would you expect? I do believe he is an important part of the team and outside of that, we have plenty of holes on the defensive side of the ball. We could realistically use all our draft picks on D, so why create another hole, even depth wise, by getting rid of him?

The most devastating hits to the franchise this past decade has been the raiding of our D-Coordinators by other teams. As soon as we get a good one, he’s gone for some head coaching gig. Perhaps we should look to create some stability there and look for a career guy like Jim Johnson, who had very little desire to become a HC. Changing defensive systems (drafting different style players) every few years really hurts trying to build a dominant D (see Baltimore. Same core group of guys).

by lboogie25 on Dec 29, 2009 7:17 AM EST reply actions  

If you read the comments made on that dumb article by tim smith

you’d see that our fans, and intelligent people in general, rightly and intelligently broke Tim Smith down, all in agreement that it’s a baseless article.

by wilddre22 on Dec 29, 2009 7:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Tim Smith

This the same guy that:

1. Said we should fire Coughlin
2. Said Tiki was right about our team being outcoached
3. Essentially said Eli would never amount to anything.
4. After 2 games with Spags as DC was a bust

To be truthful, his modus operandi has been the angryman-what-have-you-done-for-me-lately excuse for a reporter. The prosperity of the previous 2 years must have been a killer for him! He’s had little to write about. His rants often come with few facts and seem to center around how the NYG would be better off without TC and Eli.

by nard100 on Dec 29, 2009 3:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Jacobs and Tuck

Regarding the two:

Jacobs – while I knew that when it was a choice between Jacobs and Ward, that Jacobs would never lose that battle because he was a “cult” hero, a fan favorite because of this style of running…. to me, that was never the issue, my take was; how is it possible for a guy who runs like that to remain healthy in this league? Yeah, it was neat to see him run over laron landry, but how can any humans body hold up to that type of continual punishment in a league where normal backs last only a few years? In my opinion, Jacobs style, though thrilling in the short term, makes him only a situational back and a liability. Now, he is running like Ty Wheatley so even that aspect of his game is gone. I am sour because he will never be healthy enough to contribute on the level we are paying him, and this league is very cap oriented now where we need value. I think if there is some kind of valued feature back slips to us in the draft, I would not be sore about taking him. Jacobs is/was a novelty, thats about it.

Osi – I will say the same thing I said about Jason Sehorn – deal him before he gets hurt again. There are teams in this league that will overcompensate us to obtain his services, pass-rushing DE’s will ALWAYS bring a premium. Although it seems nice to have Osi, Tuck AND Kiwi, this is a luxury this defense cannot afford. And you can talk about his ability all you want, I have always contended he is so bad against the run his pass rushing abilities are mitigated – I would take Kiwi over him if you gave me the choice. Osi represents a PREMIUM bargaining chip for this team – go look at other teams websites, they are already CLAMORING for him!!!

I would not discount the fact that there is a rift between OSI in particular and Sheridan and the defensive staff which is contributing to his demise. If Sheridan goes, then maybe things will improve in that regard. But really, what teams in the history of the league could afford to maintain and pay three young pass rushing ends like Osi, Kiwi and Tuck? Unless they are all on the field at the same tiME, I am against it. I believe any of these type of players WANTS to be on the field for all the snaps – not rotating. If you are Mike Strahan at 40 yrs old, then fine, that works, but these guys are all young and in their prime playing for contracts – I think that situation leads to discontent.

by dubsrub on Dec 29, 2009 8:21 AM EST reply actions  

+1000

Agree about Osi. Trade him. Trade him now. The league and media overrate him.

by FrankB0318 on Dec 29, 2009 12:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Tim Smith Sounds like a pissed off Eagles or Jets Fan

the article does not even explain why the 07 Giants are a fluke it just states it in the headline and quick mention of it in the article but no actual reason why kinda like most Eagle, Jet or Cowboy fans.

I have a question for Giants fans? Fist let me say this has been a horribly dissapointing season and this loss on Sunday was disgusting but does it seem like the national and even NY media are going a little overboard with how awful they are this year? Yes the D sucks and needs to be adressed but so was GB’s last year and NO’s last year. I mean at worst they’re 8-8 not what was expected but my god you would think they were 0-16. Articles like Smith are absurd but it that seems to be the feeling that a .500 season and a playoff loss after a Super Bowl victory take away everything you’ve ever accomplished. The Steelers probbly won’t qualify for the playoffs and their D has declined drasticly. Hell Pittsburgh did’nt qualify after the 05 title. The COlts lose in the divisional round of the playoffs every year, the NY and national media are acting like the Giants are the first team to ever do that. Hell the Giant were supposed to be 8-8 last year after the SB and watch Dallas win the division, they did a fine job trying to repeat it ended badley but most seasons do. Peter King even put in his MMQB that not only is the talent overrated but so is the HC. Why!? Who ugshes over TC? Name the guy! Is Tomlin overrated!? He talks about how good of job John Fox has done, and hell I love Fox, but his teams have never made the playoffs in consecutive seasons in his 8 years. I’m not saying TC is Lombardi and if this team struggles next year then he will be on the hotseat but my god, what in the hell has this man done to the NY and national media to deserve such venom. His track record states he’s a very good coach who the hell overrates him? If anything he’s underrated because all anybody brings up are his faliures. Did’nt the Cowboys loose in equally embarising fashion late last year with the playoffs on the line in Philly? Did’nt the Eagles not qualify with for the playoffs 2 out of 3 years after they made a SB and were a flukey Oakland victory in TB from making it 3 out of 4 years? I’m writing all of this and I’m one of the most negative Giants fans out there but my god think about what your saying before you write this stuff and stop with the knee jerk reactions week after week and try and remember how things have unfolded over the years before you offer an “intellegent” opinion. These media types sound like my jerky 11 year old cousin anaylizing the Giants who is the only family member that roots against the Giants and all he says is Eli sucks and so does Coughlin. in fact he roots for whatever team Favre is on sounds like a certain SI colomnist.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 8:57 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

What you’re seeing, IMHO, is Eli hatred. I think dislike for Eli manifests itself on the team constantly being doubted or belittled. It’s the fact that “he’s not Peyton”, he has a “hangdog” look, he didn’t want to play for SD, blah, blah, blah. Eli hatred will never go away. If he wins 3 more SB’s, he’s the luckiest QB in the league. If we don’t make the playoffs it’s solely because of him. It’s a stupid uphill battle.

by lboogie25 on Dec 29, 2009 9:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Yea your're right but I also hear a lot of this stuff about TC

which is odd, he gets little credit when things go right but is villified when things go wrong. I know what your’re saying about Eli but it seems like the same thing exists with TC and the only logical explanation is he does not do interviews or something of that nature.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 9:39 AM EST up reply actions  

That could well be. People love to be frontrunners. When Coughlin was the angry ’ol General, most media piled on. When they want to give him credit, others will follow along like the sheep that they are. Very little independent thought.

by lboogie25 on Dec 29, 2009 9:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Also to add

Here we are, two years later and the critics or doubters are still calling Tyree’s catch as being lucky or a fluke. But, only a year has gone by and i have never heard a peep about Holmes catch being lucky or a fluke? All you will hear about is perfect placement by Roethlisberger and how Holmes made an amazing catch. It’s all about public perception and in those regards, the Giants don’t stand a chance!

by Hootman on Dec 29, 2009 9:48 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

What about Harrison's interception return

where about 7 cardinals missed wiffed on him, there was no luck involved there?

What about big Bens arm tackle of Nick Harper of a sure TD in the divisional playoff vs the Colts during Pitts 05 run?

What about Patriot WR’s dropping pass after pass in the 06 conference title game that would have beaten the Colts?

What about the tuck rule in 01, John Fox going for two and John Casey kicking the ball out of bounds late in Super Bowl 38 to give NE a short field to win the game instead of tying it, or Donnovan McNabb getting sick late in Super Bowl 39 to prevent an Eagle comeback?

I can think of about a million more examples but this should do for now. This day in age of mediority and salary cap. Luck is 90% of it. Yea you have to be good to give your team a chance but if your team is competative I truley believe luck has more to do with it than anything else including talent & Coaching.

I guess as a Giant fan I should take it as a compliment that the media and everybody else hates them so much. Only really good organizations can be as polarizing as the Giants seem to be.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 10:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Not that it means anything

ESPN, the other night ran their top 10 of the greatest football moments of the decade, and Tyrees’s catch was #1. Holmes catch was #2 and i think Harrison’s play was in the top 5. I only mention this because of the title, “greatest”, and not “flukish” or of the like! lol

by Hootman on Dec 29, 2009 10:37 AM EST up reply actions  

I saw the top two reversed. Maybe they changed it?

by themage78 on Dec 29, 2009 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

You're on fire today, Landeta.

Good job!

"We were very much aware of that. There was a lot of phone call-type things going on in the room." -- Tom Coughlin

by Mr. Met on Dec 29, 2009 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Thank you

but it’s like every person that hates the Giants are comming out of the woodwork this year to kill them becasue of an average season. But what really gets me is people are trying to take away acomplishment they’ve ever done becsue the D sucks this year. My god. They might end up 9-7 this year, sure they’ve had a bad year but wow should they hand in all of there Lombardi trophies and NFL champioships too because of this season.

I think it bothers me becasue as a Giants fan I’m pretty objective and I’m always complementry of other organzations including divsion rivals. I defend guys like McNabb and Romo agains idiotic snap media jugments and their own fair weather fans almost as much as I defend Eli but when Eli’s team does not make the playoffs becasue of a defensive meltdown everybody comes out of the woodwork to say I told you so and he’s not worth the money. Or TC is awful. They don’t respond to him anymore, really is that true or is that what you want to say becasue he would not do an interview with you. Why . . .it makes zero sense

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 12:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I love how that was ESPN #1 of the decade.

A run back from an INT, or an amazing evade the sack and throw. Then Tyree catches it with mostly one hand on his helmet, which somebody on him, and still doesn’t let it touch the turf for a good catch.
No a runback for 100 yards where he’s trying to be tackled by WRs is the best play of the decade. Gimme a break.

by themage78 on Dec 29, 2009 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Rec'd

And I suggest everyone else does too.

As Ed has been saying this whole year, TC has led us to the playoffs the last 4 straight years, with the only other team having done that was the Colts.

Not the media obsessed Bill Belichick Patriots, not America’s Team, the Cowboys, not Andy Reid “the genius”‘s eagles. Just the two manning brothers’ teams.

I’m as pissed as all of you guys, I had a freaking 5 hour car ride listening to the game, and than when it was over, pondering how could the season go so wrong?
But TC’s our coach, Eli’s our Superbowl MVP quarterback, and between the two, I believe in them to get the ship back in gear for next year. SB XVL, here we come!

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 29, 2009 7:05 PM EST up reply actions  

when has a super bowl win

in the free agency era not been a fluke? favre couldn’t get it done twice with a loaded packers team. the steelers did it twice with two completely different teams.

the seahawks never made it back to the big dance…the list goes on. making it there and winning it in the free agency era is an accomplishment in and of itself.

by cntrlalt on Dec 29, 2009 9:18 AM EST reply actions  

On a separate poin

it concerns me that we have had players carrying injuries which has effected their ability to play but have continued to play but not shown up on the injury report.

We have Jacobs, Seubert and Manning – how many more will we become aware of?

I remember the discussions about all the hamstring injuries we had in preseason.

This seems to be a much bigger problem here than we can guess at. We need to look at the conditioning coach, strength coach, medical staff and everyone else involved on this side of things to see what is going wrong here – yes some injuries happy but we have had alot some of which appear to have been hushed up – but by whom the player or the coaches?

by G Fan in England on Dec 29, 2009 9:24 AM EST reply actions  

that's a more widespread problem

than just the giants unfortunately. that’s indicative of the nature of contracts in the NFL. these guys know that they’re a game away from being replaced and cut, losing any kind of stability they might have.

look at how well beatty and boothe are playing in replace of mckenzie and seubert. if rich pulls himself out earlier in the season, and boothe comes in and plays brilliantly the coaches might say “hey this kid’s 26, he’s playing good…might be time to cut rich loose”.

they play hurt because of the stigma involved with owning up to injuries, and because they know if they don’t play they risk their jobs.

by cntrlalt on Dec 29, 2009 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree

but did the coaching staff not notice anything at all was wrong with these players.

TC has said that Jacobs has been bothered all season which has effected his performance. We have all said he had his contract and was not up for it anymore – now we know some of the reason he was slowed, but yet they kept it quiet and still played him.

Yes he was our only back with Bradshaw and Brown injured and Ware always knicked up

Is Osi’s rant the first of many to come – will we have an offseason of fingerpointing?

This is starting to look ugly…

by G Fan in England on Dec 29, 2009 9:38 AM EST up reply actions  

It looked ugly in 06

It looked ugly in the early 2000’s when Strahan and Tiki bitched about their contracts. Hell it looked ugly back in 1988 when LT wanted to be traded and sat out all of training camp in 1990. When you loose and finish the season poorley nothing looks good and when you win everything is fine.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

well the trainers

only go by what the players tell them. if the players don’t tell them that they’re hurt, or the severity of the pain there’s not much they can do short of forcing guys into MRI or X-rays machines every week to check.

of course the team turns a blind eye to injuries too though, they know the dropoff in talent from subert to boothe is a huge gap and are unwilling to make the move to sit one unless its absolutely needed.

by cntrlalt on Dec 29, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions  

which

leaves us poor fans screaming at the TV etc!

So injuries ruined our running game

So injuries and coaching ruined our defence.

Whilst you cannot prevent injuries you can do something about coaching – is there any chance BS stays?

by G Fan in England on Dec 29, 2009 9:48 AM EST up reply actions  

If he stays, I think you will see an incredible backlash from the fans. I can’t see it happening. If he does, what does the front office expect fans to think? That it will be more of the same and they may feel it where it hurts the most. In the wallet..

by lboogie25 on Dec 29, 2009 9:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly, what are fans and the media suppose to think?

These mysterious injuries come to the surface at certain points of the season which at the same time has affected their play. So while we sit here and criticize not knowing, it almost makes you feel like an ass. Jacobs is the perfect example! His play has dropped off tremendously, and we know he plays nicked-up, but we’ve also speculated on the new contract, saving himself for after football or even KG’s playcalling? God forbid if the world knew he was playing on a bum knee that PROBABLY, or more likely had an affect on his play.

What else are we going to learn out of this season?

by Hootman on Dec 29, 2009 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Do you follow baseball?

Because this year, the New York Mets, were shellacked with injuries. The equivalent in football terms, would be like having your QB out, your whole offensive line in shambles, everyone in the secondary injured, and your 2nd WR out. Seriously that’s how bad it was for the Mets.

The Giants and Mets use the same trainers. We brought this up during the beginning of the football season. Should the Giants maybe use the Yankee’s trainers?

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 29, 2009 7:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting point Will..Our guys have been demolished by hamstring problems..

..and yes one could question the training staffs credibility..I believe the Mets had their fair share of the same problem with their players..

by Bobbiblue on Dec 29, 2009 9:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Ah, at last,

a convert. The Mahareeshee will be pleased when I inform him. Today Yoge, tomorrow, the ultimate key to football success—levitation!!!.

by blue gonz on Dec 29, 2009 10:04 PM EST up reply actions  

???

Is this a reference I don’t get because I’m young?

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 29, 2009 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Nvm

Yoga, that’s it.

For some reason I thought bobbi said Yogi.

Wow, that game really messed up my senses.

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 29, 2009 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Hahaha!!

Will..Maybe “Yogi” should have been suited up..At least we’d have some better jokes and phrases, then what we witnessed and heard from the total joke they put on the field Sunday…lol

by Bobbiblue on Dec 30, 2009 5:01 AM EST up reply actions  

LOL

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 30, 2009 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

LOL!!..I hope the Mahareeshee..

Can levitate Jacobs fat ass over the level one defense and set him down full speed ahead…“Ohmmmmmmmmmmmm…Ohmmmmmmmmmm..Ohmmmmm”

by Bobbiblue on Dec 30, 2009 5:04 AM EST up reply actions  

Mam, you're getting into it, Bobbi

I wonder if Eli can throw the ball w/o his feet on the ground. The way i see it, he’ll have all day to throw (depending on how high he levitates.)

by blue gonz on Dec 30, 2009 5:39 AM EST up reply actions  

Haha!!..at least Eli would be throwing down at the receivers instead of over their heads..

He would have to plant his foot on O’Haras head though..and you know the league has upgraded the rules on concussions…Hmmm..maybe just fit O’Hara with a flat helmet..with a little splotch of sod on it.

by Bobbiblue on Dec 30, 2009 6:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Trade Osi

for a linebacker. No sense in keeping a guy who is not happy and like my mother used to tell me about guys like Osi — "you can make a fortune — buy them for what they worth and sell them for what they think they are worth. Osi has said many times that he believes he is among the best DEs in the league — let’s see if can convince another team of that and make a deal.

I’m also wondering if we have conditioning issues with this team — the last two seasons we seem to have gotten really really tired

by chris_NYG on Dec 29, 2009 10:04 AM EST reply actions  

funny thing is

we are all slating Osi for his underperformance and complete disappearance in games (even when he is on the field or sideline) but hope GM’s of other teams have not noticed this. Unless Al wants to offer us a first rounder for him in 2012!

Fans of other teams will of course clamour for him, but they do not watch Giants games and think they will get the six sack game DE and not the 2009 version.

We have a number of players whose contract is up (Moss and Wilkerson are two I believe) who have no trade value and who we should not resign. We have other players who should be cut and again have no trade value (Clark, Robbins).

Trades for players are few and far between in the NFL now and we have only a few players who are worth trading and who are worth something.

by G Fan in England on Dec 29, 2009 10:20 AM EST up reply actions  

you are of course right

The trade comment was a bit tongue in cheek

by chris_NYG on Dec 29, 2009 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

you are 100% correct...

I’m preparing myself for a quiet off season.

However, there are other guys on this team that do have SOME value…that I may be willing to part with for the right deal. Please do not think that i’m trying to trade all these guys but i believe they’re are some players that might yield some draft picks….for example; kiwi, ware, osi, manningham, ross.

Osi is a shell of his former self but for a guy who thinks he’s better than he is, he’s only due to make 3 million next year. a team that is looking for a pass rusher may opt to take a chance on him….at the expense of one of there draft picks. Of course Osi has voiced his displeasure w/ his contract so that may also be taken into consideration….

and unless an agreement is reached 2011 could be a lock out year…i’m not sure how many teams are going to be interested in players looking for a hefty contract.

I would hate to lose a kid like Manningham but if it means we can bolster our defense than i’d consider it. We did trade away a draft pick to grab Barden….and let’s face facts, we have too many WR’s as it is….even if Moss get’s cut.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Dec 29, 2009 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree on Manningham he is the best traid bait

1.) He’s pretty good and has shown flashes of becoming a star.
2.) He’s young
3.) The Giants have Smith and Nicks and I belive Hixon is a fine 3 with maybe Barden devoloping or even Beckum becoming a slot threat.
4.) Having 3 young really good WR’s is a luxery the Giants can’t afford right now with all of the defensive issues they have
5.) To get value you have to give up value so yea Manningham would be the guy becasue I think the organization is higher on Hakeem Nicks.

I agree though I would hate to see Manningham leave but in the NFL your not going to get value unless you give up some value and a quality young LB Saftey or D-Tackle that has impressed and still has a big upside would mean more to the Giants right now than a quality 3rd WR.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 3:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree, A & L

Hell, despite all the cries for a trade or use of a # 1 to get a WR, I wanted an LOT first, a safety second(no knock on Nicks, a future All-Pro I’m sure.) We’re loaded with WRs. I can’t believe that with Hix, Barden, Hagan and possibly Beckum to choose from we can’t find a damn good # 3.

by blue gonz on Dec 29, 2009 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Osi

Fire Sheridan and then re-assess with Osi. If he returns to form then a three DE rotation is a good thing – esp if Tuck goes inside on 3rd down. The wild card there is Sintim. Should he be a DE?

Same perspective on depth with Jacobs. He may be the starter but count on AB getting more carries. Jacobs softens them up – AB gets the yards. Trouble is Giants are paying BJ to be a feature back. Oh well. But he still has value.

Then ID who is the third back – Ware or Brown.

The OL is actually a bigger concern for me – get it stabilized and keep the same five in the same slots for awhile. McKenzie should go and Beatty should start. Snee is a fixture. That means Giants need to evaluate longer term solutions for LG and Center.

by MSP Giant on Dec 29, 2009 10:34 AM EST reply actions  

IMO, Osi needs to re-evaluate himself first

The Giants have seen enough of him to force them into demoting him. If Osi has an ounce of integrity, and “thinks” he’s all that, then he’s going to have to prove it. By that, he needs to work on his run support, and work on it some more. If this work proves to be an asset, then all parties involved will be happy and he may get that bigger payday.

His only value now is moreless a one-dimensional pass rush specialist. We know this, the Giants know this, and now it’s up to him to know this!

by Hootman on Dec 29, 2009 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

Osi....

finally is learning what life is like w/out Strahan.

I know those two were great friends and joked around a lot but sometimes I wonder if Osi really knew how great Stray was. I remember Osi making comments about seeing more double teams than Stray did (which was totally asinine)….but i really wonder if he know how much better strahan made him…and everyone else on that line for that matter.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Dec 29, 2009 10:57 AM EST reply actions  

I can't believe

I have to wait 8 whole months before the Giants play again. That is all.

by SonictheHedgecock on Dec 29, 2009 11:13 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Well technically there is one more game...

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Dec 29, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah. man

and last night’s game looked fun as hell for Bears’ fans, even if their team is out of the playoff picture.

"We were very much aware of that. There was a lot of phone call-type things going on in the room." -- Tom Coughlin

by Mr. Met on Dec 29, 2009 12:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I bet Eli was drooling

looking at that sorry-ass Minnesota secondary. I hope young Mr. Nicks was watching, too.
I mean, you gotta figure Childress (or Favre, whoever’s calling the plays there,) will run AP at us all night and they’ll win…but I bet we could throw a few bombs and be successful.

I left my swagger in my other pants.

by HughG16 on Dec 29, 2009 5:24 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 29, 2009 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

2007 was a Fluke?

Come on? You go on the road on each playoff game and beat each team and then top it off by beating what everyone was calling was ‘The greatest Team of all time’?

That is just utter nonsense. I guess you could attack it by saying the road teams weren’t tough but they beat Dallas and Green Bay which are two tough spots for any playoff team.

by The Curse on Dec 29, 2009 11:22 AM EST reply actions  

Indeed

total nonsense. You win all those games on the road, that alone should be enough to prove it wasn’t a fluke.

But then you have to put it into context… the following season the Giants WON THE DIVISION… obviously they were a strong team and everyone was thinking repeat until things went bad at the end of 08’ season. And that was without Strahan.

This season has obviously had its troubles, but the failure was more about inconsistent play. And keep in mind, there were some key injuries on defense, not to mention, this team is not the same team that won in 07’.

by lovebigblue on Dec 29, 2009 1:09 PM EST up reply actions  

my first post--time to weigh in

I’ve been a religious reader. Thanks to all of you for your thoughtful commentary. I’ve spent more time reading your posts than I probably should. Now for my two cents.

First, is this at all surprising? Once KP and AP went down, you’d have to say no. Of the back seven, exactly how many could start for a contender? CWeb, Boley (probably) and TT (maybe). At best, 3 of 7. They just didn’t have the horses. Sheridan may suck, but they lack the talent to compete at the highest level.

Second, where does JR go from here? I think the focus should be (no surprise) on the back seven. Being in Seattle, I didn’t see enough games so I don’t know all the alignments used on the D-line. But, for next year, I don’t know why they don’t move Canty back to end, put Tuck at T (we know he can play), and hopefully Alford returns as the other tackle, and have Kiwi at the other end. To me, drafting a T over an athletic MLB or safety would be a huge mistake. The single highest priority in my opinion is safety, since: (1) we may have something in Goff (too early to know); and (2) we KNOW with absolute certainty that if KP does not return to form we are hosed at S. We simply must prioritze this again, as JR did when he drafted KP.

Third, the past draft. I agree that it is too early to assess definitively. However, much as I respect Free’s opinions, I disagree with his comment that if all we get out of draft is Nicks and Beatty it’s a solid B. Let’s assume they both turn into solid pros (not Pro Bowlers, but solid), and all the other picks are non-contributors over the long haul. You cannot build a champion with 2 solid guys out of the draft per year. You have 22 starting positions; guys get hurt, they get old. By the time you are five or six years down the line, at 2 per year you have fielded half your team and then you start losing some of those contributors to injury/wear and tear (see jacobs, brandon). The bottom line is that the difference between the average and the superior teams is how they draft in rounds 3 and below. JR did this spectacularly in his first year (where would we have been without AB and Boss in the SB run), and he failed to do it last year. Given the lack of any help from the bottom half of the draft, this draft (if things work out with Sintim and Barden) you get a B draft. If not, it’s a C at best. (That’s no diss to Nicks, who I’ve liked from the get-go, but it’s just a reality….getting two players out of, what, 7 or 8 chosen is no way to reload for another SB run).

Thanks again to Ed and you all for a most entertaining and informative site.

by NorthwestFan on Dec 29, 2009 1:56 PM EST reply actions  

Nice to have you, Northwest

A well thought-out post, the kind we love here.
I disagree with one thought about the defense. It’s not just the back seven. I think this team desperately needs a dominating defensive tackle. Somebody who can blow up the line of scrimmage, demand a double team and give the middle linebacker a free run to make plays.
To me, that is priority one.

by Ed Valentine on Dec 29, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep, DT first, Ed,

But S second (as it should have been last year.) Then OL

by blue gonz on Dec 29, 2009 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

We need a big hefty DT to take up space, a safety, than probably two offensive line guys for when age catches up to our guys.

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 29, 2009 7:33 PM EST up reply actions  

What about Tuck and Alford

Ed, I get the need, but why can’t Tuck (once he’s not limited to one arm) perform the role of DT that “can blow up the line of scrimmage?” We got Canty, he’s not going anywhere, why aren’t we playing Tuck exclusively at T and leaving Canty to play the position he should play? When Tuck was playing between Strahan and Osi, he was a force to be reckoned with. And, while you can never be certain Alford will return from injury, he seemed like guy who was primed to make a difference. I’m not disagreeing with your assessment of the need, I just don’t understand why there’s not an inhouse solution once everyone is (hopefully) healthy next year.

by NorthwestFan on Dec 29, 2009 3:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Because Canty played in a 3-4

a 3-4 End goes up against guards not tackles.
In college he was a 4-3 DT as well

by mclaren_is_the_best on Dec 29, 2009 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Robbins will be gone

and Bernard will probably be cut (or at least I would).

Cofield has had major surgery.

I hope alford can come back full strength, but we need someone to replace Robbins and Bernard.

Imagine if we had a big, space filling DT. A haynesworth guy without the injuries. Now imagine, Osi, Tuck, and Kiwi surrounding him.

imo, while our passing defense sucked, so did our running defense, minus a few games.

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 29, 2009 7:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Tuck

is 275 pounds. He would never hold up in the middle. As a pass rusher on occasion, yes, he is a force. As an every down player, no. He is 30-40 pounds too light.

by Ed Valentine on Dec 29, 2009 9:37 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree Tuck is way way too light for tackle..

He’s fine right where he is..and when healthy he’ll be back in business..My only problem with Tuck is that he needs to take on a leadership role..We desperately need that “Guy” who can pull the defense together..It just has not been there this year.

by Bobbiblue on Dec 29, 2009 9:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Tuck

not being able to play tackle..as effectively as he was even last year..killed the Giants this year.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 29, 2009 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

nice post...

i agree w/ your assessment of the draft.

here’s a number for you…we didn’t chose 7 or 8 guys last year. In fact we had 10 picks and drafted 9 players. I’m holding out to see what Barden, Beckum, and Brown do before I call this draft a success or a bust….but again, i think some of those later selections may have been better off being dealt for future picks. I know we all thought we were built to win now….but you can’t ignore your future and I think JR dropped the ball w/ some of those late round pick ups.

We can thank him for Nicks, but we might as well thank Philly for that….we wanted Maclin over Nicks….I mentioned it the other day. Both players seem to have great potential. I give the advantage to Nicks so it was kind of a blessing that we didn’t get our 1st choice.

also, i’m inclined to agree w/ ed….it’s not only the secondary. it’s very much on the dline as well.

I think our Corners are solid….we need serious help at Safety….and lastly, i’ll reiterate it again….do not get too excited for Alford this year, after the knee surgery, and after seeing what other guys have done coming back from that kinda surgery…don’t expect much.

I think Cofield and CAnty will really make some noise next year should they be able to remain healthy.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Dec 29, 2009 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

about the draft

I wish they had’ve tried some of the Safties/ CBs they got from this year’s draft. Some of them didn’t look so bad but they seemed to toss them to the side.

by themage78 on Dec 29, 2009 5:24 PM EST up reply actions  

they got cut

bruce johnson beat them all out…and I thought Travonti Johnson (who also got cut) out played them as well.

and the sad thing was those guys; Stoney woodson and DeAndre Wright weren’t Safeties they were both CB’s.

You wonder why we had so many CB’s…I guess we knew this would probably be Dockery’s last year but you’d think w/ Web, TT, and Ross they wouldn’t pay so much attention to that position???

Unless Ross was a bigger concern the whole time? I don’t know but it was certainly warranted. Just not THAT much…in terms of drafting CB’s and than signing FA CB’s after the draft….and bringing Dockery back.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Dec 29, 2009 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

maybe aaron ross informed jerry reese that he doesnt want to play for us

and that is why they signed a bunch of CB’s to replace him and Dockery who both (might) not be with the team next year.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Dec 30, 2009 12:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Great post

The thing with TUck playing in the middle is he only does it in passing downs because Centers and Guards cannont matchup with when trying to pass block so he can’t do it all of the time like I think your suggesting. Also his shoulder injury limited his ability to play inside a lot of this season.

We’ll see about the draft still early, Manningham looked like a bust after 08 but played well this year maybe we’ll see that kind of improvement from Sintim next year. I agree the late round picks in 08 are not panning out, Brian Kehl does not look good at all and Goff might be servicable one day but I’m not counting on it.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 4:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Tim Smith

is a retard. Very nice to see him get his @$$ handed to him on the comments section under his article. The man(?) just wants to get a rise out of people who read his atricle. What a joke. 95% of the defensive unit that was on the 2007 team are either no longer with the giants, or did not play most of this year. Tim Smith an absolute joke. probly a cowboy fan

by Gmen Fan in Gmen Land on Dec 29, 2009 3:38 PM EST reply actions  

I have read through some very good commentary here today..but..

I have yet to get over Sundays debacle to add my own thoughts / opinions on next year..I’ll most likely wait until after the Vikings game before I join in..but very good comments..I guess my feeling right now is more than them letting all of us fans down, they let themselves down..Personally, I don’t need them to apologize to me or you folks..I’ve been down that miserable road with them before..for years..They need to look at each other in the eye and apologize to each other..and I don’t for one second buy that lame excuse about Jacobs having a knee problem..that is plain bull. Show me one injury report that had his name listed on it Hello?, nor do I buy into that jazz about Osi holding back because he wants a new contract ..Idiotic..Where do these fools that speculate on this crap drink at night?..and what do they drink?

by Bobbiblue on Dec 29, 2009 4:59 PM EST reply actions  

Agree Bobbi

Osi did hold back, he a rough year and he’s pissed no big deal.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

personally...

i wouldn’t be shocked if Jacobs was really injured…wouldn’t be shocked to see him undergo surgery in the off season either.

remember D. Johnson never appeared on any injury report either….and he was just placed on IR.

Eli was also playing hurt this year and his name was never mentioned on any injury list until the play when he actually had to leave the game (on the TD to nicks). But he was playing hurt prior to that moment.

Coughlin actually takes a lot of pride in that….keeping guys going as long as possible. He was very critical of Fassel when he took over. Accused fassel of letting guys off easy…said too many players ended their season on IR and vowed to change the culture around here.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Dec 29, 2009 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

You may very well be right Andio..

But I recall Eli being listed as probable with his foot injury..I never saw Jacobs on it, and it is a league rule that results in fines if a team refrains from it…Agree that TC was tougher on these issues than Fassel, but he still stood by and let Plax ride a stationary bike all summer during camps, although Plax did show up and play every week…So, TCs tougher approach seems to have been a tad bit selective.

by Bobbiblue on Dec 29, 2009 5:35 PM EST reply actions  

you could be right too....

my memory is shot.

and ur definitely right about TC’s approach being selective….I remember when Plax gave him an earful coming off the field last year and I remember thinking …. here weeeeee go….but TC actually let it go.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Dec 29, 2009 8:20 PM EST up reply actions  

KG vs BS...

I’ll admit, be the first to admit that I was part of the Kevin Gilbride Witch Hunt…BUT..in looking at the year in review, his offense for the most part posted up significant points..Enough to certainly win games..While Bill Sheridans defense allowed more..I have also been calling for his head on a stick, and still am..I have backed away from being overly critical of KG in recent weeks..and I know we all love Spags, but these problems have eminated from the end of last season, and have grown worse obviously..and great teams have the depth to handle injuries and be successful..Our teams depth is spotty and needs improvement.

by Bobbiblue on Dec 29, 2009 5:48 PM EST reply actions  

Any chance

We see some Pharaoh action on Sunday?

DB

by DukBudr on Dec 29, 2009 6:21 PM EST reply actions  

I'd love to see that..Put that kid in a real game situation..

The M/O on him is he is better in a real game than practice…Let’s see, give him a look..Something tells me that if they do, we will all be pissing and moaning about why they didn’t have him in there 8 weeks ago..

by Bobbiblue on Dec 29, 2009 9:29 PM EST up reply actions  

We should not trade Umenyiora

This is what our nickel (pass defense) DLine should’ve been this year

Kiwanuka – Alford – Tuck – Umenyiora

this is how it turned out to be

Tuck – Kiwanuka – Canty – Umenyiora

So as you can see Alford and Tuck’s injuries really screwed us over.

Now if we trade Umenyiora this is what our nickel DLine would look like

Tollelfson(special teamer at best) or Sintim(hasn’t done anything when he was in there so far) – Alford or Canty – Tuck – Kiwanuka

For a team that is built on the Dline and them getting pressure on the QB there are a lot more questions about them without Osi than with him.

Unless we get a early 2nd round pick that we could use on Carlos Dunlap it really wouldn’t be a good trade for us.

If it was up to me trading Aaron Ross would be a better deal. He’s always injured, doesn’t look like he wants to play for the Giants and Thomas is a better CB.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Dec 29, 2009 7:58 PM EST reply actions  

5-1-5! 5-1-5! 5-1-5! 5-1-5!!!

I’m so mad we scrapped that D this year. I think with sintim, and latter with rouse, we couldve done some different things with that. Those 2 are wildcards – able to play numerous positions.

Sintim couldve played the lined, then drop back with the 1 linebacker(say boley for instance) before the snap to give a regular nickel look. Or he could stay on the line and rush, or drop into a zone.

Same with rouse. He played a rover back in college, and has the frame to play LB. Have him as one of the 5 in the secondary, then come up as a LB. Or have him as the 1 LB and in actuality have a 6 DB look. Or if you want to really get crazy, line up sintim as an end, rouse as a safety, then as the offense lines up bring sintim back and rouse forward and go into a 4-3 look! The possibilities are endless!

Sorry if I’m ranting, but I was really looking forward to seeing it this year, and I’ve been tinkering with ideas in my head about it for awhile. I’m done.

by wilddre22 on Dec 29, 2009 10:39 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

aaaaaaaaaahhhhhhh

Last year Burris shot himself in the thigh…This year the whole team did…..

by njwhistler on Dec 29, 2009 11:08 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Landeta_small
All Time Giants Super Bowl Team
Arqamaca-p218897_small
Congratulations From a Raiders Fan
Hakeem_nicks_compartment_syndrome_leg_injury_small
The Jerry Reese Game! v2012
Nyxlvi_small
Do people not realize how good Osi is?
Pic_1_small
Here to eat some crow and talk football.

Recent FanPosts

Snv30403_small
Rest In Peace, Whitney
1bradshaw_small
Jeremy Lin = Victor Cruz
Jjones_small
How the three man rush saved the Giants season
Small
Now that this glorious season is ova...
Small
Draft Discussion – Which Offensive Players FIT the Giants?
Bluemanning_small
Road to the Hall of Fame

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Get Your Giants' Gear

160x600_ny_giants_medium


Editor-In-Chief

Ed_valentine_2_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Small brisulph

Authors

Mike_farley_small Mike Farley

Meme2_small Sean Kerr