Big Blue View: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Voodoo Five for South Florida Bulls Fans!

Tom Coughlin is the right man for the job

Tom Coughlin will not be fired. Nor should he be fired. A 'Wet Willie' for all of you screaming for TC's head in the wake of this disappointing season.

Calling for Coughlin's dismissal is an emotional over-reaction to a bitterly disappointing season. A season of high expectations that has been lost in a sea of horrific defense, putrid special teams play and missed opportunities.

To be honest, I can't believe I am writing today about Coughlin's status as head coach. But, in the wake of some of the comments following Sunday's game I felt I had to. So, I am going to do it here today. Then I am not going to do it again. Because the idea of firing Coughlin is absurd.

Star-divide

As 'SBaker' eloquently pointed out Sunday evening, the Giants have spoiled us in recent years. Here is part of what 'SBaker' wrote:

"If you're not a fan of the Colts, then your team isn't going to win 12+ games and make the playoffs every single year. That's the reality of the NFL. ... Anyone calling for Coughlin's head is delusional.  This, at worst, is an 8-8 football team this year. That means that in TC's six seasons, this team has finished .500 or better in all but one of them, gone to the playoffs in all but two of them, and won a Super Bowl."

That is pretty darn good. And pretty much any franchise not named the Indianapolis Colts or New England Patriots would kill for that kind of track record the past six seasons.

You simply do not over-react and throw that away the first time something disappointing happens. That is how you end up being the Washington Redskins. Or the Oakland Raiders. Or the Cleveland Browns.

The buzz around the league is that big-name coaches like Bill Cowher, Mike Shanahan and -- eventually -- Jon Gruden are available. It's pretty instructive to compare TC's track record to each of them.

  • Coughlin -- Fourteen seasons, eight playoff appearances, five division championships, a Super Bowl title and a .552 career regular-season winning percentage. Keep in mind also that TC's first job was with an expansion team, and it took him just two years to get that team into the playoffs.
  • Cowher -- Fifteen seasons, 10 playoff appearances, nine division championships, a Super Bowl title and a .51 career regular-season winning percentage.
  • Shanahan -- Sixteen seasons, two Super Bowl titles, only seven playoff appearances and a .598 regular-season winning percentage.
  • Gruden -- Eleven seasons, one Super Bowl title, only five playoff appearances and a .540 regular-season winning percentage. 

So, Coughlin compares favorably with each of these big-name coaches a slew of NFL teams would love to have. He IS one of those big-name, big-time coaches. If TC was available today, those same teams would be lining up begging him to come and rescue them.

Look a little deeper, particularly at Cowher. In his first six seasons in Pittsburgh, the Steelers made the playoffs. Then, they went 6-10, 7-9, 9-7 and missed the playoffs three straight times. Still, the Pittsburgh organization recognized what it had. After two more playoff appearances, the Steelers stumbled to 6-10 in 2003. Still, Cowher stayed. Pittsburgh was rewarded with a 15-1 record in 2004, and a Super Bowl title in 2005.

Philadelphia's Andy Reid is another great example. He has been with the Eagles 11 years now, including a 6-10 season in 2005 and an 8-8 mark in 2007. Where are the Eagles now? Looking, quite possibly, like the best team in the NFC.

Sometimes, no matter what the coach does the players he is working with just are not good enough. That is the case with this Giants team -- especially on the defensive side of the ball. To flip-flop Dennis Green's famous remark, these defensive players are not who we thought they were.

We thought this was a dominant defensive group that would carry this team deep into the playoffs. Instead, it turned out to be an aging, injured, un-athletic group that spent much of the season getting physically dominated. Bad defense is the primary reason the 2009 Giants are not a playoff team.

Blame Coughlin for hiring Bill Sheridan if you want. Remember, though, that TC's first choice for the job was Dom Capers, who ended up in Green Bay. With no shot at Capers, TC chose to give the players something they wanted -- system continuity -- by hiring Sheridan.

It, obviously, has not worked. But, as much as you want to blame Sheridan you also have to blame players for poor tackling, bad coverage, blown assignments and getting dominated at the line of scrimmage. They got what they wanted, and proceeded to play some of the worst defense in the history of the franchise.

The Giants undoubtedly need to make some changes to get back to the top. The head coach is not one of them, however.

He is part of the solution.

0 recs  |  Comment 189 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Big Blue View

Cowher wants Giants?

Jan 2010 by Ed Valentine - 90 comments

Press conference transcripts

Jan 2010 by Ed Valentine - 21 comments

Tom Coughlin, 01.04.10

Jan 2010 by Ed Valentine - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

Wrong

You are a smart guy Ed but even smart guys can be guilty of misjudgements.

I have called for TC to go since Strhan almost led a mutiny several years ago. TC adjusted – to his credit – and they won the SB. His coaching was a part of that success.

But since winning the SB it has been a rollercoaster of a mess and two things are clear :
1. he has lost this team
2. he is an adequate coach at best – a grade B- coach for a team, an ownership and a market that deserves the best.

He is overly conservative. When is the last time a NYG rookie won rookie of the year – or for that matter was even in the running? TC leaves talent on the bench when they should play – if for no other reason to see what they can deliver. This year I am talking Sintim and Beatty. Others would add Beckham and Barden.

He has stuck with Sheridan too long. OK, there is value in loyalty but not to the detriment of the team. Sheridan ran a solid D into the ground. Did you see ANYONE on that D improve this year? It is called coaching and TC and Sheridan did not deliver.

But the telling thing is he has lost this team. Osi is a niche player but he is very valuable as a pass rusher. He wants out now. Michael Johnson has played well in the past but now he is a big questionmark. Same with Thomas. I can go on. I am sure others will.

You are right that the Mara’s will not fire him. More misplaced loyalty. So this conversation is more about venting.

But the fact remains TC should go. He is no longer the best coach for this team. The NFL has passed him by.

by MSP Giant on Dec 28, 2009 10:16 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

There's a reason that teams like the Titans.

the Eagles, hell even the Panthers, are what they are year in and out. Even the Steelers with the extremely overrated CHIN running them.

Stability.

Coughlin…with his team at worst going 8-8? Are you absolutely out of your MIND? 8-8 at worst? One season removed from 12-4. 2 seasons removed from a Bowl win?

Coughlin is not the problem. Coughlin MUST stay.

Or else…next year probably would be worse.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And Hakeem Nicks is in the running.

YOu’re worried about a rookie?

Maybe if Hakeem Nicks is NOT HURT FOR A FEW GAMES HE RUNS AWAY WITH THE ROY.

Every coach/team has down seasons.

You should kiss the ground Coughlin walks on that its gonna at worst turn out at 8-8.

8-8!! FOR CHRISSAKES!!!

As a Yankee fan I dunno how this will sound…BUT YOU SOUND LIKE A YANKEE FAN!

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I am a Yankee fan

and have seen you on the Pinstripe blog FB. I enjoy your perspectives. Another smart guy who is missing the point on this one. TC should go. I guess that makes me a contrarian on this board cuz Ed passionately agrees with you.

Look at the swings in performance. Last year 11-1 and then collapse. This year 5-0 and then the same. No, good coaches do not do that on a regular basis.

I am not worried about ROY – just TCs propensity to NOT play very talented rookies. And Nicks is not in contention for ROY. Not really. He missed games early in the year for several reasons – injury being only one. And he did not start until the second half of the year because HAM was starting.

by MSP Giant on Dec 28, 2009 10:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He didnt' play...

cuz HAM was starting..cuz Nicks got injured and HAM earned that spot.

HAM is essentially a rook.

I don’t understand…you don’t like Coughlin’s propensity to NOT play rooks…yet he did in 2007 when needed..and essentially this year when needed.

When you don’t have to play a rook…you don’t.

Rooks may rookie mistakes.

Manningham was as good as he was this year cuz he sat for a year and watched.

Everyone..from the fans to the coaches to the owners…misjudged this season.

They got hit with a ton of injuries. Not just a ton of injuries, but injuries in the wrong spot.

Key guys were playing with nagging injuries that sapped what they do best. Tuck’s power, Osi’s speed…all sapped for various reasons.

Even the new guys, Boley and Canty, their devlopment with the Gints was sapped cuz of early training camp injuries.

…All in all..it simply was NOT THEIR YEAR.

Some heads will roll…..the right heads.

Coughlin’s head needs to stay. It just doesn’t make sense.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Misjuged Season

so the coaches should be absolved of all blame? TC is the head coach. He’s responsible.

We’ve been on KG all season. Last week his play calling was a masterpiece. Yesterday’s opening drive was the same. A thing of beauty. Eli threw 6 straight passes. We barely ran the ball. Can someone please explain when we’re down 17-0 or 24-0 KG is now running the ball on first down? The same sh*t ass plays BJ to the right! Like other fans I want the Giants to be a running team first. But why start the game pass happy then become a running team when we’re losing big?

I simply don’t understand the play calling at times.

by FrankB0318 on Dec 28, 2009 10:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

TC gets blame.

Blame does not equal firing.

Blame equals hot seat for 2010. That’s it on Coughlin.

As for Gilbride….they always..ALWAYS run the ball. Everyone runs the ball. You have to try.

Now I agree somewhat..when Eli’s passing well, they need to go to it.

But the way the Panthers D was playing..Eli wasn’t exactly passing all that well was he?

He’s not his brother, we know that. His brother is pretty much the only one in the game who can get away with a well below average running game.

You gotta run the ball to keep the D honest.

When you have a pussified RB like Jacobs back there….pretty much and QB is toast.

Ask Drew Brees the past 2 weeks what’s happened when the running game doesnt’ have to be respected.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

The running game being terrible was the reason that Eli coudnt throw the ball.

Because the G-Men weren't good enough this season; GO CINCY!

by ChuckyofNorris on Dec 28, 2009 7:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I have no problem with TC

2007 earned him a mulligan. now if we have a repeat performance, then i agree we need to revisit TC future with us.

Nicks is in the ROY running. he’s among the leaders in many rookie receiving categories. your off on that one MSP. I see your concerns on the collapses though, but Tom gets another year in my book.

by wilddre22 on Dec 28, 2009 11:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

11-1 then collapse?

What I saw last year was a team that won every game they needed to (until a bad playoff performance); they got homefield, won the division everything they wanted during the regular season. After a loss to the browns we werent going perfect, so the team had nothing to play for, they beat Carolina in the last game that mattered. You cant dislike Coughlin because he led his team to the best record in the NFC? Thats crazy.

Because the G-Men weren't good enough this season; GO CINCY!

by ChuckyofNorris on Dec 28, 2009 7:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

are you serious??

someone should void you of having the first comment on this board

1. he has lost the team? how is this even possible. bcuz they played bad this season at times? lol. good point.

2. ROY? so this is a valid point in saying tc should be let go? rookies make mistakes…but your saying that you can guarantee that rookies will play better than the vets that know the playbook? you can guarantee that? so you would change the lineup and take a CHANCE that a rookie will perform better when your team one game back of the playoff hunt?

barden? lol… check the stats..and watch the games. wr is down on the list of needs for our team

+1 on mjohnson – his angle of pursuit is bad and he is being exposed w/o a good safey next to him…but tc has lost the team because of this? TThomas is seconod year and has shown great strides. the giants are without their starting S, both CB’s.. and a rookie(sac of ish) d coordinator. I dont blame coughlin for any of that.

u dotn make a drastic chang midseason. u try and right the ship and make due with the coaches. changes will be made this offseason and coughlin does not deserve to be one of them.

by semsemma on Dec 28, 2009 10:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rookies

I’ll take a year of Sintim including mistakes instead of a year of mediocrity from Clark.

Just one example.

Butler played with M. Johnson when Johnson was performing better. Butler is a good safety? No, Johnson regressed.

by MSP Giant on Dec 28, 2009 10:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

agree on sintim

but comparing johnson of this year and him playing with Butler is out the windown.. two complete different defenses with different coordinators…..still doesnt apply to coughlin being thrown under the bus

by semsemma on Dec 28, 2009 10:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

so...

do you want rookie mistakes? Or a steady vet?

Rookie mistakes throught the year don’t give you 8-8/9-7.

It gives you 6-10…4-12.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

aaaaaaannnnnd.

He’s rated as the Giants best LB.

So…..what’s that saying?

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Clark sucks

There are lies, damn lies and statistics.

When have you EVER seen him first to a play?
Make a game changing play?
Force a turnover?

No. Clark is a mediocre player and I would take my chances with Sintim.

by MSP Giant on Dec 28, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Clark is a steady below avg backer

never makes the big mistake, never makes the big play.

by wilddre22 on Dec 28, 2009 11:23 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Driving a Smart Car

is a measurable for a Linebacker now? Note I am not a Clark fan, but that was something made in jest I hope.

by brisulph on Dec 29, 2009 9:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Clark is a back up at best

Seems like a very nice man, but geez at this point in his career there is no way he should be starting. The fact that he is on the field to me speaks volumes about our depth (or lack there of) at the linebacker position.

by Late for Dinner on Dec 28, 2009 11:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Johnson is worse without Phillips

ask Steelers fans how much less they like Ryan Clark with Troy P out

by queler on Dec 28, 2009 11:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Johnson, needs to be replaced

I agree with you that KP was the main cog, but we should look to replace Johnson next season, he is not up to par.

by Late for Dinner on Dec 28, 2009 11:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the funny thing about MJ

that play he made on Smith was spectacular! and it still worked against us! i mean he hit him as hard as any safety in the league, as evidenced by the snapping of the wrist. but the beast that there steve smith is showed when he shed that tackle like it was my 2 month old making it.

just our luck

by wilddre22 on Dec 28, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

lotta bad luck this year.

It wasn’t the Giants year.

Pretty much as cut and dry as that.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sintim would be good if we were going 4-12

we were in the playoff race so we needed security. Clark provided us with a player who we knew and though not great or even all that good, he wouldnt make mistakes as big as some a rookie would almost definetly make.

Because the G-Men weren't good enough this season; GO CINCY!

by ChuckyofNorris on Dec 28, 2009 7:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So, who is better?

Each of the big-name coaches available has had ‘swings’ in their careers. That is how the NFL is now. Tell me who should coach the team, and why you can guarantee he is better than Coughlin. I disagree that TC has lost this team. I think, simply, there isn’t as much talent as everyone thought.

by Ed Valentine on Dec 28, 2009 10:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You don't have to defend TC

Ed, I been a Giant fan for over 30 years (I can’t believe time went that fast) TC has earned the right to come back and try and fix this mess. For all those that are calling for his head, I think you guys are acting a little spoiled right now. The TC era has been one of the better coaching era’s since our championship days in the 50’s! We have had 5 straght non losing seasons, you have to go back to 1963 to surpass that in Giant history. We have been to the playoffs 4 straight years, 10 years ago just making the playoffs was enough to make me happy. Factor in the SB in 2007 and I would say we have had a pretty nice run under TC.

Nobody is saying TC is the best HC in the business, but he is a winner and a SB Champion, one of only 3 active coaches to win the Lombardi. Yes this was a fustrating season, but our Defense is the main problem. We hired a rookie DC who was not up to the job, injuries and some players got old on us this season. We need to fix the defense, TC has earned enought capital to be the coach who gets a crack at fixing it.

by Late for Dinner on Dec 28, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure about you

but with the talent this team has 8-8 is a bad year in my scheme of things.

Stability could mean more 8-8, 9-7 and 6-10.

Not for me.

by MSP Giant on Dec 28, 2009 10:21 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

They had a bad season.

One bad season.

After what he did with these guys…the same guys basically who were what they were in 2006…did what they did in 2007 and 2008.

8-8..9-7, is not a bad year.

Its disappointing when you have SB expectations yes….but one bad season, in Football, after 2 very good ones, is not reason to can him.

He gets 2010.

He’s 100% on the hot seat again tho…that I know.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I call 2008 a bad season

because of the way they collapsed.

But I do have expectations to go into the playoffs every year with a team playing reasonably well and with a chance to go somewhere. That was not last year and certainly not this year.

by MSP Giant on Dec 28, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

2008 Collapse

was a bad season and a season that ended in disappointment. The Giants and their fans used Plax debacle as an excuse. Good teams. Well COACHED teams don’t use that as a distraction for 5 games.

by FrankB0318 on Dec 28, 2009 10:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

so...

12-4 wasn’t a chance?

They had a chance last year.

They had a chance this year.

They were in it until week 16 this season. Week 19 last year.

See….what they did in 2007 is rare. Like I said..they aren’t the Yankees.

Take 2007 and store it. Things like that don’t happen all the time.

1986. 1990.

Bill Parcells. Bill Belichek. Won one year…took 4 years to do it again.

It simply DOES NOT HAPPEN ever year.

As bad…as absolutely HORRIBLE this season was at times…..THEY MAY STILL BE 9-7.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

12-4 was no chance

correct

anyone could see they went into the Eagles game not playing well. They were a one and out 12-4

by MSP Giant on Dec 28, 2009 10:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hindsight is 20/20 I guess.

That’s crap and you know it.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea..sure.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:42 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you, Free

That is what many have been trying to say. Treasure the great memories, they don’t come along often. Be disappointed, sure. But, this team is not that far away.

by Ed Valentine on Dec 28, 2009 10:44 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

But I do have expectations to go into the playoffs every year with a team playing reasonably well

How long you been a Giant fan? making the playoffs every year is a recent thing that only TC has brought us. Before we would have a great year and follow that up with a mediocore year.
Oh and by the way last year we did have this guy named Plaxico who shot himself and totally messed up our team chemistry and was a huge distraction going down the stretch.

by Late for Dinner on Dec 28, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

TEams collapse like that all the time this day and age hell it benifited these same Giants in 07

07 Pats and Colts, 05 Colts, 06 CHargers, 04 Steelers, all of these teams regressed imensely as the playoffs began after dominating the regular season it’s happening to NO and MInny this year.

by Landeta on Dec 28, 2009 11:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

its not an exacty science...

on how to finish the season.

I agree…I’ve said all along the Vikings and Saints will collapse.

I’ll add the Colts to that list now too. They really know how to screw up a 15-1/14-2 season.

Bengals/Chargers and the Packers is gonna be the Bowl this year.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would love

a bengal Packer SB. I have a horrible feeling it’s going to be Philly beating SD and finally getting one then repeating next year. Just a bad feeling I got.

by Landeta on Dec 28, 2009 3:36 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I would love a Begals Pack Superbowl too

I dont think anyone expected the kind of play from the Begals that they have been showing.

Because the G-Men weren't good enough this season; GO CINCY!

by ChuckyofNorris on Dec 28, 2009 8:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

hot seat or not, chances are this is his last contract anyway...

…at some point, the age factor creeps in, and going on 64, TC is already the most senior HC in the league. Given his devotion to family, I can’t see him coaching into his 70s…

by Step up and make big plays on Dec 28, 2009 10:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If anything TC should be more hands on on game day..some times. HC needs to get I the ear of his coordinators…I would give BJ 1 more year, he had an off year ! It happens.. Osi needs to stay..when healthy he & tuck have proven to do wonders for every one around them..if ross & cw along kp come back healthy mentally as well as physically we should be ok…LB & o line are priority..a DT comes next

i dunno maybe I just like the colors

by Mr.Williams on Dec 28, 2009 10:27 AM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

+1

Ill make that LB, DT, then O line. only because we have a future ol with beatty. the decision will be made if richsuebert is better at G than mckenzie is at RT.

Cuz beaty may get bigger n stronger this offseason, and if hes ready, deihl can move to guard, with mckenzie back at RT.

by semsemma on Dec 28, 2009 10:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That's BS

As ‘SBaker’ eloquently pointed out Sunday evening, the Giants have spoiled us in recent years.

Why shouldn’t the Giants organization and fans expect a good team year in and year out. Until 2008 they Yanks made the playoffs 13 straight seasons. This year has been an utter failure. Not because we failed to make the playoffs but how we failed. Not showing up in Denver on national TV. Then yesterday’s debacle. The last game at Giants stadium with the playoffs on the line? That’s a f*cking disgrace.

Why accept mediocrity?

by FrankB0318 on Dec 28, 2009 10:29 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

There’s nothing eloquently in that statement.

by FrankB0318 on Dec 28, 2009 10:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

All I'm saying is

that when you look around the NFL there is a salary cap and tremendous parity. It is not baseball, where you can overwhelm with your resources like the Yankees do. As bad as this team has been at times, it is still a few plays away from having 10 or 11 wins right now. No one is ‘accepting’ mediocrity. You simply have to realize that not every year is going to be perfect, and not every playoff-less season is reason to blow up everything and start from scratch.

by Ed Valentine on Dec 28, 2009 10:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I understand

We can’t expect perfection each year. But what we were shown this year is an absolute disgrace. In the last 10 games we’ve given up 30 or more points in 5 games. More than 40 i four games. That’s not fans being spoiled. That’s a team that quit. They quit on BS. They quit on TC.

by FrankB0318 on Dec 28, 2009 10:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

if you just look at the stats...

yea..you can say that.

I saw a ton of great plays being made by the offenses (See: Muhammed and Steve Smith’s TD catches. One was a perfectly thrown, indefensible ball. The other…the guy broke his arm and held onto the ball).

I know its hard to hear/read….BUT IT WAS NOT THE GIANTS YEAR.

its as plain simple and out in the open like a Baboon’s red ass. That’s what this year, 2009 was.

There was just so much bullcrap working against the Giants this year.

They didn’t have luck on their side. That’s no one’s fault.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

No one accepts what has happened this year...

yet…the “Yankee fan” attitude is what’s blinding many here.

This is football. Crap like this happens.

Then…look at Wade Phillips this year..they’re making the playoff aren’t they (dammit…).

You come back the next year..and do it again.

Why the hell can the coach? It damn near never works out the next season (Bucs stink. Broncos are on the brink of the same record/collapse as last year).

Coughlin’s on the hot seat for 2010. That’s all that should be said.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yanks were a bad example

there’s teams in the NFL that are good almost every year. We didn’t just lose games 21-17. If we did I could accept that. We gave up 48, 40, 45 and 41 points. 41 points vs a average team with a ‘rookie’ QB in our final game at Giants Stadium.

by FrankB0318 on Dec 28, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

BTW

I’m not a Yanks fan. Regretfully, I’m a Mets fan.

by FrankB0318 on Dec 28, 2009 10:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was just going for the Yankee fan 'mindset'

The mindset that they must win the champ. every year..or else heads MUST roll.

I mean..I like it cuz the owner preaches it, and fields a team every year capable of it.

Its just as unrealistic as it gets…and it really irritates me that people 100% believe it.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

2001-2007

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:29 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It just irks me

when fans say we’ve been spoiled. The last 1 1/2 season has not been spoiling.

by FrankB0318 on Dec 28, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They were 12-4 last year.

8-8 at worst this year.

20-12 in 2 years…and we’re talking about firing the coach.

…that’s spoiled.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1000

Free, could not say it better myself, yes we have been spoiled and despite all the revisionist history on the board, last year was a successful season, granted the ride ended early but there were some distrations out there too that played a major role in the team folding in the playoffs.

by Late for Dinner on Dec 28, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You must not remember the halcyon Dave Brown and Danny Kanell years

5-11 and 6-10 consecutively during my formative high school years. I would have given a kidney just to be to be competing in week 16 for a playoff spot. You can’t assume greatness in sports like your entitled to it. That’s the kind of fairweather attitude typical of the dreaded Cowboys/Yankees/Lakers trifecta.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Dec 29, 2009 2:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

After a few weeks of pessimism...

I am going to write something rather optimistic. The ship has been torpedoed, but it is not sinking. We just need to bring the ship back into port and fix it, not go out and get a new ship! In other words, Coughlin has proven he can be a very successful coach, just look at what Ed pointed out. I have always been a big TC supporter and I will continue to be. For the past 3 years, I have called for the head of Gilbride and I now call for the head of Sheridan. Okay, KG has called decent games the past 2 weeks, but I still think that the organization can do better in regards to a offensive coordinator. If I am not mistaken, TC is an offense guy, which means that the team needs a good d-coordinator, and Sheridan is not that guy. It should be imperative that the Gmen go and get a great D-Coord at this point. No doubt there is talent and the offense is not the problem right now (except for getting younger on the line). So, who is out there is terms of d-coordinators?

by CCE718 on Dec 28, 2009 10:29 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I agree that a coach shouldn’t be fired after one down season, but Coughlin has done a poor job this season. Give him a chance to turn it around, either for continuity’s sake or for sentimental reasons, but he should be on the hot seat.

by XLII on Dec 28, 2009 10:44 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

What can be said about Cowher and Gruden (and maybe Shanahan)...

…is that both Gruden and Cowher are master motivators that do a superb job of getting players to “punch above their weight class” and play better than their individual talent level should dictate. Year in and year out these guys found ways to be competitive and win with whatever personnel they had because guys bought into their system.

by Step up and make big plays on Dec 28, 2009 10:45 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Shanahan

and Gruden’s teams quite on them last year.

Both were 8-4…or whatever the hell they were, and their teams quit on them.

They were leading their divisions. 4 game leads…and they missed the playoffs completely.

THAT PEOPLE…IS QUITTING on your coach…not what we’ve witnessed with the G-men this year.

Cowher? Well…I guess you can call it Steeler luck. That’s more of the fact they have a great DC with no intentions of being a HC anytime soon. It worked for years with JJ in Philly (RIP) and with Lebeau there in Pitt., that’s what you need..a DC with stability.

Cowher is OK. He’s a name. That’s it.

Should it so happen that Coughlin does go…the slim chance this offseason, and the possiblity next year if 2009 repeats itself….I hope the Giants stay as far away as possible from all these “Names”.

They are nothing more then that. They are all no better then Coughlin…that’s for DAMN sure.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

*Quit

they QUIT on them last year.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 10:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

right, the december slide is what cost both men their jobs...

…and rightfully so, but for over a decade in each instance every one of these guys did more with less. And there’s something to be said for that. It’s about having a system, having your players bought into that system and playing for each other, and having continuity.

by Step up and make big plays on Dec 28, 2009 10:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not enough is made...

on the injuries with this team (yea..its not).

These guys didn’t have these sorts of injuries.

Injuries that ended seasons. Injuries that created 60% of key players as well.

You don’t learn from a winning..12-4 season like last year.

You can learn from a season like this.

JR is a smart GM..and I still trust his moves.

I trust he’s learning a ton from this season and will adjust accordingly. All of the remaining coaches will.

As time goes on..I don’t even think they’ll be rash enough to fire Sheridan. He’s a first year guy.

Spags…we were all spoiled with Spags. A brand new DC is not supposed to do what he did.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:08 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Injuries are part of the game, and every team has their fair share of them...

…it’s how a team adjusts to injuries that separates the men from the boys. when their number is called guys have to go out there and step up and make big plays.

In the beginning of the season, I thought perhaps we had someone who could do just that in B. Johnson, but in time he made his fair share of rookie mistakes. Name me one instance this season (with perhaps the exception of Beatty) where a guy who was suddenly pressed into duty as a backup made an impact…

by Step up and make big plays on Dec 28, 2009 11:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Goff was pretty much all over the field.

Yet..basically acted like the rookie he is.

Beatty, Nicks, Goff, Johnson…all talented, made plenty of rookie mistakes.

Spoiled we all are with that 2007 class being thrust into action and actually doing something.

This year’s class is more normal..but no less talented.

Beatty, Goff, Nicks….3 starters. Sintim probably would’ve been too if he could stay on the field early on and learn.

4 probably starters. Can’t ask for much more.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Cowgirls have not had their fair share this year

look at their IR report and compare it to ours.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Dec 29, 2009 2:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Even the Eagles...

while they’ve had a ton, hasn’t been in key spots like the Giants.

The O-L had a lot of em, but they had the depth to back it up with plenty of former starters.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 29, 2009 12:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sheridan

Free I normally agree wholeheartedly with what you say, but characterizing a decision to fire Sheridan as “rash”… I don’t know about that, I think we’ve seen this Giants D give up 40 points enough times over the course of this season that a decision to fire Sheridan would be wise, not rash.

 Maybe we were spoiled by Spags, and there is a learning curve for new DCs, but Spags brought in an entirely new system and had the D firing on all cylinders in 2 1/2 games, while Sheridan inherited a strong unit and scheme and everything promptly went to shit. You can blame injuries but our more or less healthy unit (minus Boley, Canty and Ross) gave up 250 yards on the ground to the Boys in week 2 and failed to shut down a single team with an average or better offense for the rest of the season. I am a strong proponent of stability and wouldn’t dream of letting either TC or Gilbride go but the D has been so abysmal this year that it’s hard to imagine that a new coordinator wouldn’t be an improvement. Another season with Sheridan would be the rash decision here in my opinion.

by SonictheHedgecock on Dec 28, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm saying its rash..

cuz the guy’s a first year coach.

Other then that I agree. Its been so bad that he’s gotta go.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Gruden did more with less

because he and his general manager put together some putrid drafts for four years running.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Dec 29, 2009 2:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Quit?

You don’t think the Giants quit yesterday?

Maybe they didn’t quit. They certainly didn’t show up. How does a team not show up in that spot?

by FrankB0318 on Dec 28, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

no...

I don’t.

They didn’t quit.

Sometimes the game can be what that game was..and doesn’t mean a team quit on the coach.

One game doesn’t indicate quitting.

What happened there was they came out like it was the Redskins game…they blew a tire and fell in quicksand.

NOTHING they did…helped. They tried…but its just got worst.

Eli tried to rally the troops…then, that INT happened (regardless of whether it was a blown call…it happened.).

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 12:23 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Quit?

Yes, they quit, but worse then players quitting, playing emotionless football, was that the coaches quit, do you really think coming out in the second half, we would be running the ball so much? That we would be huddling up so late in a game down by 4 and 5 scores? To me, thats the coaches quitting on the players, and the players have been awful a large part of the season(defense that is) but coaches are suppose to do whatever they can, put their team in the best position to win, and that wasnt done yesterday and several other times this year, maybe TC deserves another year, but make no mistake, TC was a big part of the problem this year, no emotion, no cohesiveness, and flat out poor play on a consistent basis falls on the coaching.

by BigBlueCrew_jfl on Dec 28, 2009 1:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Giants are not years away

as some may think.

This is not a team that needs to be re-built. Some well placed strategic moves personnel wise, some freedom from key injuries (losing KP hurt more than we know) and some good coaching and this team can be competitive in the post season next year.

Despite the aquisitions of folks like CC Brown and Bernard I still trust JR to plug gaps in a smart fashion. I wish I could say I trust TC to deliver the coaching part of that but I do not.

But Ed is right that the Mara’s will not fire him so I hope to be eating my words next year about now.

by MSP Giant on Dec 28, 2009 10:47 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

So how would a new coach with a new system

turn everything around in one year?

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Dec 29, 2009 2:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

TC should stay.
BS should go.
KG was better, but we can def. get better than him)

we need.. LB, DT, OL

if our seconary stays healthy, its a good secondary.

i would bring in a very good LB, and a smart above average DT

than id draft some OL and bring in a vet or two to backup the secondary in case of injuries

LET'S GO RANGERS!!!

by Moshe52792 on Dec 28, 2009 10:55 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't even say TC is on any "hot seat."

He’s a good coach, a proven winner. If I’m the owner, he’s back for 2010 and ’11, at least.

Now, Bill Sheridan… he should not JUST be fired. He should be sent to Guantanamo Bay.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Dec 28, 2009 10:56 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't even say he's on the hot seat next year

He’s done a good job, Tom’s a good coach and he shouldn’t be under pressure because of one bad year.

Sheridan needs to be given his pink slip the moment there’s triple zeroes on the clock against Minny.

Next season could be great, Kenny Phillips will be back, Osi will be healthy, maybe we have a decent DC.

Smith, Nicks, and Manningham should all be ready to have great seasons…as good as they were this was really there first years starting full time.

Eli Manning should also take another big step forward, maybe to a QB rating of 100+, he looked great this season and who knows how good if that foot injury had never happened. If he gets 3 TD’s against Minnesota (we don’t have much else to play for…), he could reach 30 touchdowns and 4000 yards. Numbers usually associated with (GASP) Peyton! Still too early to say that he won’t be as good as his brother, this is the first year we’ve been a passing team.

"We're only going to score 17 points?"

by Edgware on Dec 28, 2009 10:57 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think the biggest point of this team is they misjudged

the exact strength and weakness.

Who thought that the pass O would be the strong point? I bet the entire coaching staff didn’t think so either.

Now on D…no one really knows…but injuries and inexperience..from the DC right on down (wait..he IS a first year coach? You mean…first year coaches are not supposed to coach like first year coaches).

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:06 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

The debacle on D this season should make us all appreciate just how rare a talent like Spags is...

…in a span of about 30 months he acceded from position cocach to defensive coordinator to head coach. That right there is a meteoric rise. In some sense, it’s unfair to compare Sheridan or anyone against Spags because he really is the exception, not the rule…

by Step up and make big plays on Dec 28, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I actually think JR knew what the weakness would be

D-Line thats why he went out and paid so much for Canty and Bernard, he just missfired badly. I think he knows what to do as a GM he just did a bad job evaluating the FA market plain and simple.

by Landeta on Dec 28, 2009 3:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

TC must GO

Although I respect the various opinions here, I can’t believe some still think TC deserves to stay.

First: What ALL the other HC’s you mentioned have that TC does not is PERSONALITY. When he came to NY (as HC), it was “my way or highway”. When he realized he was losing the team, he ‘matured’ (??) and created his leadership council. Two extremes, no? He lucked out, in that the Giants won the SB. Before that, I the same pattern was emerging: a TEAM losing it down the stretch and being out-coached.

I have never appreciated TC’s style, despite his “winning record”. I realize I am one of the rare few .. but I am sticking to it: TC and the entire coaching staff must go.

Go Gmen

by giants013 on Dec 28, 2009 11:09 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

lucked out ..

meaning, if Spags had not found the way to disrupt the Pats resulting in that Giants win .. (for most of you) we would not be having this conversation

Go Gmen

by giants013 on Dec 28, 2009 11:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

they didn't luck out.....

they were the better team on the field for those games.

ESPN and mindless non-Giants fans will site one Tyree catch.

Anyone who actually sat through the games knew the Giants were the best team on the field those games.

That’s not luck.

That’s coaching and talent.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

In all honesty

that game should have been a blow out for the giants.

It shouldn’t have even come down to a late game winning drive by Eli.

2nd drive of the game, the Giants were marching down and would have scored a Touch down if Steve Smith didn’t bobble the football into the Patriot’s defender’s hands.

And the steelers had their dynasty in ’70s because of “The Catch” were a play that would have been intercepted, except it was 4th down so the defender knocked it away, and a steeler dove and somehow caught it.
That is luck
Catching a football on your head, that is skill

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 30, 2009 9:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well by that rational argument

Parcells “lucked out” by having Belichick put together a game plan that stopped the bills monster of an offense in ’91.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Dec 29, 2009 2:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'll disagree

any time you beat 3 division champs at their respective houses and then defeat a history making, undefeated team in the Superbowl, that’s not lucking out. I really don’t think you luck out 4 games in a row. Other than that, any suggestion of a HC that has PERSONALITY?

by njgiant on Dec 28, 2009 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

of course!

Its just a list.

They’ve done nothing in NY either haven’t they?

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I understand that it's not your job

but for shits and giggles, if it were your job, who would be on your list and why?

by njgiant on Dec 28, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Personality?

What does that have to do with anything? Does Belicheck have personality? Did Dungy have personality? Shanahan’s not Mr. Personality. Personality has nothing to do with it.

by Ed Valentine on Dec 28, 2009 12:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the grass...

is not always greener.

Why do everyone who want him gone have not a single reasonable alternative?

Its always..fire him and hire “Big Name Coach A or B”.

Coughlin IS big name coach.

Yes….the defensive staff probably has to go, even if a whole lot of it is not their own fault.

But Coughlin and Gilbride were not what was wrong with this team.

Actually…..Cougling and Gilbride are probaby a reason why the team has 8 wins in the first place.

The other 8 are on the defense.

So….if the defense is respectable…why can’t they get 2 more wins?

Really…no..none..Zero sense to fault Coughlin and the O staff.

Its mindless blabber to say this sort of thing.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

that's a good point

if the D had shown up a few more plays .. we could have been a 10 win team. But that’s my point – I’d like to see that type of urgency being created by TC to ensure that the Team makes it their business to do so.

All I saw was ‘we shoulda, coulda .. but didn’t’. enough .. make it happen, or get out of the way for someone who will at least try something, ANYthing to do so. TC failed as a leader. That’s why I think he must go

Go Gmen

by giants013 on Dec 28, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

urgency?

They tried all kinds of different crap this year.

Urgency? They benched a former all-Pro DE and their starting DT for years.

I don’t understand what the hell you’re looking for?

They went with what they have.

What they have…wasn’t there, cuz it was either off the field on IR..or on the field at a 60% shell of themselves.

They were urgent. Sometimes…urgency doesn’t show up the way it should.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

urgency

like removing a DC, or even supporting him with someone who was willing to listen to his ‘leadership council’ on how to make that a better D

I expect ‘leaders’ to make those decisions too

Go Gmen

by giants013 on Dec 28, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

like the Redskins did?

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

like the Bills did?

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Like the Bucs did?

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So...

by firing, altering the coaches position in the hierarchy…that’s gonna automatically help?

I’ve said all along the play of the D was more then Sheridan and the coaching staff….doing something with Sheridan…probably not gonna help all that much.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 12:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Its mindless blabber to say this sort of thing.

No – it is not.

It is a discussion of options available. Firing TC is one option, never mind it will not happen.

So why did TC get fired at Jacksonville again?

by MSP Giant on Dec 28, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

why did

bill belicheck get fired from cleveland? or pete carroll from the jets?

its because fan outrage scare owners into making moves like that and not allowing coaches time to build consistency.

some firings are justified, or seem like they are at the time. did bill deserve to get canned in cleveland? maybe…do the browns wish they never did it? you bet your ass.

by cntrlalt on Dec 28, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

cuz he was 7-9

6-10, 6-10 his last 3 seasons.

Did he do that here?

He didn’t win a SB in Jacksonville either did he?

Kinda like in NY tho…his defense and running game let him down.

Fix that..fix the Giants.

They have their Jimmy Smith and Keenan McCardell.

Get a non-Fred Taylor and Tony Brackens (meaning…guys that stay healthy and on the field)>

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

don't forget...

Tony Boselli was a beast. The rise of the Jags probably doesn’t occur without that cornerstone LT.

by Step up and make big plays on Dec 28, 2009 11:47 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

no doubt...

and the fact he was basically shot in those last 3 seasons is no coincidence.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Who made Boselli

the # 1 pick in the draft? TC, of course. A perfect pick for a new franchise.

by blue gonz on Dec 28, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Housecleaning Needed.

So because other teams are worse off, we should feel good about 8-8?
Nooooo…….I’m a NY fan (and a serious Yankee fan) who asks: what have you done lately?
Super Bowl? 2 years ago; yawwnnn…..Last year: eliminated in frist round – by Philadelphia, no less.
Fire TC and his minions and give Spags the key to Ft. Knox to come back.

by Gray-wolf on Dec 28, 2009 11:20 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

your solution

is to fire a coach on the grounds that he only won 8 games, and replace him with a coach that won one game?

by cntrlalt on Dec 28, 2009 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Unfortunately

this is the mindset i constantly bring up. the what have you done for me lately attitude that has us questioning our star D-end and our 1000 yard back. This proves my point – Coughlin has been our best coach since Fassel, and yet hes being questioned. no one is above reproach.

at least Gray wolf is manning up on this attitude that plagues us.

by wilddre22 on Dec 28, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

your right

let me rephrase then: our best coach since Bill. He’s far outdone what Fassel did in his career, so i should not short change TC. and that’s coming from a once TC detractor.

by wilddre22 on Dec 28, 2009 11:37 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Speaking of Fassel

I was watching the game in a sports bar in Arizona yesterday and guess who walked in at kickoff? Our old head coach was watching the Browns-Raiders game (studying for a new job perhaps?) and said that the Giants are “overrated” and “aren’t that good a team,” although since they were already down 24-0 to Carolina at that point it wasn’t much of a controversial statement.

by SonictheHedgecock on Dec 28, 2009 11:54 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yup.

Its just mindless talk.

Kinda makes me embarrassed to be a Yanks fan when I hear this.

I like the winning…but WS or else everyone’s fired is just so wrong….

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

apples and oranges

no salary cap in baseball, a championship can be won in the offseason or on one individual’s talents.

football takes 53 guys under a salary cap playing against teams on equal footing.
can’t compare coughling to any baseball manager

by cntrlalt on Dec 28, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

NYG are not NYY

NFL is not MLB

Maras are not the Steinbrenners.

But GW is right – a New York expectation that pro teams win is not unreasonable. God save the Knicks.

by MSP Giant on Dec 28, 2009 11:42 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

A Little Balance

I used to know a guy who was a friend of George Young.
Young used to say that he loved the fans (paid his salary), but thank God, they weren’t in charge.
I admit that I’m that kind of fan, BUT I remember the 70’s and, being a Yankee fan too, don’t want to see a return to wandering in the desert waiting for another Bill Parcells.
The NFL is a “win now” place ( who knows what an uncapped league will look like), I expect (at a minimum) a yearly playoff appearance.
Most fans, I think, would think that to be reasonable.

by Gray-wolf on Dec 28, 2009 11:49 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

and...

we’ve gotten that haven’t we?

Gotten a SB out of it?

One year..no playoffs.

You’ll live.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 11:53 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

and I will admit I am one of those fans who may not always see ‘logic’ when it comes to the Giants (so it’s a good thing I’m not running the team ;)

A HC needs to plan for a season that includes constant change and adaptation (like we all do in our day-to-day!), so I expect a TC to ensure everything is put in place during the off-season to act accordingly when the season starts. The whole coaching staff looked shel-shocked after Game 5.

But again, lucky for all I am not running this team :)

Go Gmen

by giants013 on Dec 28, 2009 12:00 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yearly Playoff Appearance

There are 32 teams in the league and only 12 of them can make the playoffs. As a Yankee fan I understand expecting your team to make the playoffs every year but the Giants don’t play 162 games without a salary cap. They play 16 games, and one or two plays can decide an entire season. Expecting to make the playoffs every year is ludicrous. This year was without a doubt a disappointment, but it is easy to point to a few crucial moments (settling for the FG at the end of the SD game, Eli’s botched slide, walking out of the tunnel in Denver) that essentially knocked the giants out of the playoffs. Things go a little differently and we are maybe 10-5 going into week 17. We have some serious issues on the defensive side of the ball that need to be addressed, but we are a competitive team (we got blown out a disgraceful amount of times but we played close games with SB contenders Philly, San Diego, Arizona, and Dallas). And that, as opposed to a playoff appearance, is what you have to look for as your bare minimum from a team I think.

by SonictheHedgecock on Dec 28, 2009 12:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

there's a slim margin...

from 8-8…to 10-6 to 6-10.

They pulled out victories against Dallas in the first one and ATL..but those could’ve been losses.

They lost games against the Cards and Chargers..(and I’ll include the 2nd Philly game..) that’s 2-3 wins.

talking 10-11 wins possibly if some luck goes the Giants way. 6-7 wins if even more luck goes against them.

This same team was possibly 11-4/10-5 right now.

Some Manningham catches, a Snee block, less penalties on defense.

Its the breaks of the season. Its what lead to 8-7 right now. That’s all.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 12:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Fact is no SB winning coach has gone on to win a title with another team...

so I don’t want a SB winning coach. I want TC to stay, because he knows how to make good players into great teams, and his influence on this team is undeniable. This team will at worst be 8-8, but realistically with better execution from the defense it could at least have had two more wins under its belt (the SD and AZ losses were bad luck).

The Giant’s have had a fantastic decade: 6 playoff appearances, 2 NFC Championships, and 1 SB win (in one of the greatest upsets of all time), and I love the stability of having an intelligent and hard-working coach driving this team.

by dabluman on Dec 28, 2009 12:27 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I completely agree

Before the Super Bowl season I was very upset when the organization gave TC an extension, but now I would not want any other coach than TC. Ed was right on the money comparing with the other pseudo great coaches, TC is right there. Yesterday at half time I was upset because how important was the game, (playoffs, legends present, last game at giant stadium) but for the missing the playoffs I accepted that, we had a good run and probably we have more to come, we have a very good GM, a great coach, great QB and perhaps and frachise receiver on Steve Smith, defense needs adjustments, I don’t know about replacing the D players or Sheridan. I’ve been a Giant fan long enough to be on either side of the ball, meaning good wins, bads wins, terrible losses, lopsided wins and this time it was our turn to be on the loosing and embarasing side, but I expect better things to come for this franchise, becase now there is estability.

by Bajaserge on Dec 28, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Stability

The stable franchises are the ones that always have the consistent success. The Giants are in that category, and need to stay there.

by Ed Valentine on Dec 28, 2009 2:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

This team was not well coached

The teams (Offense, Defense and Special Teams) were schizophrenic, week in and out, all three, you never knew who was going to show up and play the game. Much (if not most) of the problem falls on the locker-room leaders. The rest is on the coaches.

This was not a team that gave 100% Simple as that

by StubsNY on Dec 28, 2009 12:32 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

the offense

showed up to play week in and week out.

by cntrlalt on Dec 28, 2009 12:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The play calling was up and down ...

but it’s really tough to put it all on the OC when the DC has put you in a 14-0 or 17-0 hole so early, so often.

The line play at opening holes for the running game was also very inconsistent week to week.

Eli and the WR’s were our best unit, except when down big early and often.

by Shofner85 on Dec 28, 2009 12:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

and also, before the season, I was up in arms that no free agents were signed to replace Plax and Toomer.

by StubsNY on Dec 28, 2009 12:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

TC should stay..Bill S go

I think he has made some mistakes but he is a very good coach who I like a lot of Giants fans slept on the 1st yr or 2….THe D Coord has to go and Jerry R had a sketchy draft and offseason for the 1st time as GM…

Barden in the 3rd rd NEVER Dressed this yr let alone cracked the lineup…and Simtim should have been passed up or parlayed into one of the USC LB’s…the late part of the draft was not as productive as yrs past 5th rd QB & 7th rd CB were reaches at best (only reason I am saying that is compared to what he has gotten in the previous drafts)

Injuries have reallly hurt this team …AP ..Phillips & going back to last yr (all though seems like he is not needed at this pt) Plax..Corey Webster ..Aaron Ross..Kareem Mckenzie..No excuses but its like calling for Jerry Manuel’s head after half the team went down..As far as guys quitting I think Osi is at odds with Bill S and some guys on D seemed to be dragging but who are we to know who is quitting ??

New D coord..good Jerry R draft ..injured players returning ..solid FA pickups and we should be ok next yr..I hate the parity of the NFL however it will allow us to rebuild quickly if they are smart… Happy Holidays and Happy New Year everyone ..

P.S looking forward to the BIG FAN ( Indie film starring Michael Rappaport about a fanantical Giants fan) coming to DVD

by MUSKRAT on Dec 28, 2009 12:43 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

TC

I agree, TC should not be Fired, however Bill Sheridan should be together with some of the unproductive defensive players and get some new blood in there, I moved to Dallas and still am a Jint but am so dissapointed at our defense which has been humiliated by each and every team except Washington who are worst than the Jints are, time for some good picks and rebuilding the defense. We have some good players on offense, just need a little tweaking on the offensive line to give Eli a little more time, hope to see a better season next year.

by Ivan Crandon on Dec 28, 2009 12:52 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Tom gets another year.

2010, his ass is burning. Deservedly so. But he stays. As he should. His mettle gets tested once again. Don’t be surprised to see the old, “faux military, wish I was the bastard child of George S. Patton” Coughlin reemerge. It might be a good thing. Friend of mine says there’s nothing to build on, the wilderness is upon us. I’m not so sure. Yes. The D needs a complete overhaul. The O line and running game worry me. Jacobs, a punks punk, figured out and diminished, should be gone. Who’s the # 1? It isn’t AB. Eli, WRs, TEs, all good. That’s about it. Don’t get me started on special teams. Sorry, folks, this team is in rebuilding mode. Happened to the Raiders after their last SB, fast decline, happening here. Though I do think the organization, unlike the Raiders, has the smarts to do everything needed to put the brakes on. All that said, Tom gets a chance to fix this.

by ZILLAG on Dec 28, 2009 1:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I dunno about rebuilding mode...

they need to “rebuild” a bit…but the Raiders had Rich Gannon..an ancient QB.

The Giants..now that the hopefully realize Eli and the pass O is the lifeblood of the team, should use it.

This probably will play into Gilbride’s strengths. A whole offseason built towards realizing they are an aerial assault team instead of power running?

The running game and the defense..mainly the pass rush, need to be addressed and ‘rebuilt’.

But as long as they have #10 under center, and he’s gonna be here a long time….they merely have to ‘re-tool’.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 1:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree TC should stay

but the rest of the coaches and coordinators did not call the plays that would put the Giants in the best position to succeed. Too often Tuck was dropping back in coverage, or the receivers would be bunched together, or a trap-block would let Jacobs get hit before he got going.

by StubsNY on Dec 28, 2009 1:05 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Gilbride was good.

Not at all the problem…in fact, he was a reason for much of the success of the offense this year.

I know this is probably heresy right now…but even Sheridan wasn’t all bad.

How many times….8/10..10/10, where there players in position to make tackles?

Re-watching the Panthers game…DAMN NEAR EVERY PLAY..there was someone in position to make a tackle.

I ask you..and all else who spew out that Sheridan MUST take the fall (he will and probably should…so maybe I’m asking myself too?) how the MF is it the DC’s fault when guys are in position to make plays?

Isn’t that the DC’s job? To get guys in position?

It seems simple..but is it the DC’s job to tackle? IS IT! No for real…is it?

No..its not.

Guys are in position to make tackles….THEY DON’T MAKE TACKLES.

Not only did they not step up and make big plays…they didn’t DO THEIR JOB AND MAKE ROUTINE PLAYS.

Sorry…Sheridan tried…did his part. The guys on the field, for whatever reason, didn’t execute.

Not saying Sheridan isn’t without fault….but really, not much more then any other DC.

Bill Belichek in his heyday wouldn’t survive with a team that tackles like this.

And don’t tell me they should bench players…..THEY WERE WORKING WITH THE BENCH.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 28, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The lack of consistancy in the playing has a lot to do with coaching

after the Philly game, the Eagles pulled out tackling dummies and did tackling drills, BS should of done that after Week 2 in the Cowboy game.

I hear what your saying about BS but for whatever reason this team was a much sounder team fundamentaly week in week out under Spags. Sometimes coaches make that much of difference. Corey Webster was awful under Tim Lewis and became a very good corner under spags, why? SOme of it was scheme a lot of it was mental.

The other thing that speaks to coaching is it seemed liked the same problems, tacking, communication issues, deep passes were beating this team every week. They never improved unless they played Washington. Not improving and not having players respond is a hallmark of bad coaching.

They also seem to get down on themselves very early in games, they had no moral at all. They let up a bad drive early and it was like mentaly they were out of it and it would spiral out of control. With a good coach the players belive in I’m not sure that happens.

I get what your saying about BS. Schematicly he was probabbly not doing anything wrong but I don’t think mentlay this team responded to him. Tackling, allowing teams to score 40 + points on you, game winning drives in the 4th quarter, and menatal errors are all effort and pride things and I don’t think BS was able to get these guys to belive in themselves and get the best possible efforts out of them and thats where the problem lies. After this past game it’s hard to belive TC would bring BS back it just can’t be good for moral of the D.

by Landeta on Dec 28, 2009 3:34 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

didn't DO THEIR JOB AND MAKE ROUTINE PLAYS

Maybe that’s the reason BS should go? If the players won’t play for him, you can’t get rid of the players, although some will go, deservedly so.

by blue gonz on Dec 28, 2009 1:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I don't think Coughlin should be fired, either

But the Giants played gutless football on Sunday. Some of that has to be on the coaches. I’d say the honeymoon period from the Super Bowl win is now over. The 2010 Giants will have a lot of talent – if TC can’t make them into a playoff team, it might be time to give someone else a try.

by long time listener on Dec 28, 2009 2:04 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

First a Long Digression and then my thoughts....

    One of the things I see on here a lot is the comparison of assembling a championship baseball team to a championship football team. But usually it’s the $ system that’s mentioned as why they aren’t comparable. Well, they aren’t, but for some other reasons as well. First, a baseball game is played with 9 players on the field, not with 22 plus a few specialists (kicker, punter, holder). Thus the impact of bringing in a new “star” player is an upgrade of 11% of your starting lineup, not an upgrade of less than 5% of your starting lineup. And of course if you’re able to bring in three big new names a year, you’ve turned over 33% of your starting unit. Football takes longer to turn around and more moves to make a signifcant change.
    
   Further, much of baseball is played in series of individual confrontations that are strung together to create a result. If your flame throwing reliever strikes out the side in the ninth, it doesn’t matter what the defensive skills fielder were, they don’t come into play. Likewise if your cleanup hitter hits .300 with 40 homers, he’s going to get 4 or more shots a game to make something happen, his ability vs. the pitcher’s. Football however is a series of short-time span scripted chaos, which depends upon multiple players doing their jobs simultaniously. And the result of how MANY of those players handle their responsibilties effect the outcome. Manning throwing to Smith is going to be more successful in general than Manning throwing to Hedgecock. Manning throwing to anyone isn’t going to work real well if the line doen’t block and he’s on his butt looking skyward.

   Anyway, I think TC will and should stay next season, though I hated this year and don’t hold him blameless for it. Adjustments HAVE to be made and some of them that should have been attempted weren’t. I think by the time it became obvious Sheridan wasn’t the man for the DC position, it was too late to make a change. It was the middle of the season, and a change likely wouldn’t have worked. However, that Sheridan got the postion and had it going into the season seems a mistake at this point.
   
   I think Sheridan needs to go. Yeah, he’s first year, but there was no progress being made, there was no continuity, there was no cohesiveness and whatever the scheme was, large numbers of people on the defensive field thought it was something else. He simply doesn’t have command of the defensive unit. And the inability to make adjustments, either game to game, or within a game when things aren’t working well is glaring.

   I don’t like Gilbride. I don’t like undertilizing the team’s advantage at tight end. Some of the play calling is questionable at best. Still, he has won, he has won with this team, and quite honestly, the overall offense was very acceptable. Further, the glaring weak point that was expected at wide receiver was a strong point. Maybe with less focus on worrying about the non-existant receiver problems, more effort can go into other areas of the offense.

    Feagles needs to be retired. Directional punting is fine, but this year his legwork consistantly resulted in short fields for the opposition. Tynes was acceptable (though nervewracking) as a field goal kicker, but his kickoffs consistantly resulted in shorter fields for the opposition and he is well substandard in that area.

    Some of the defensive linemen coming off injuries last year may rebound. If not, they need to be unemployed or employed elsewhere. A good draft will help. I’m not sure but that team can’t come back and do well next year. But I think it would be without Sheridan and Feagles and with a deep kicker. I’d also wonder what the story is with the very “unspecial” special teams, which always seem to be a substandard area. Changes on the coaching staff there might be in order too.

    Overall, I believe in continuity, and don’t like “change for change’s sake”, but Sheridan has shown nothing, and the other areas I mention I think need to be addressed as well.

by Cranky50 on Dec 28, 2009 2:29 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Ed great post not much to add

but here is some more food for thought about Shannahan and Gruden.

SHannahan was fired in Denver last year becasue he refused to fire his defensive coordinator and defense has been a huge problem there since the Elway days. ALso his Bronco teams had a tendencey to collapse at the end of every season. He had a brilliant 3 year run which lead to two SB titles but he never was able to win consistantly without Elway and his defenses sucked so if you want some 9-7 football with a great O and a first round playoff exit than Shannahan is your guy. And by the way he went 13-3 in 96 and earned th 1 seed and lost in his first playoff game to guess who, TC and the Jags.

John Gruden, are you kidding me? He won with Tony Dungy’s team. You think keeping only 3 saftey’s on the roster all year was a mistake wait till Gruden keeps 5 QB’s but only 3 D-Tackles and 2 safteys. Late season collapse’s well last I checked the Bucs were 9-3 in 08 and lost all remaining 4 games including one at home to lowley Oakland and Jamarcus freaking Ruessel in which TB blew a 2 TD 4th quarter lead. That loss propelled Philly into the playoffs which ended the Giants season. Gruden has done enough for the Giants organzation thank you very much.

I’m not saying these guys are not quality coaches, all I’m saying is they have flaws that will drive you even more insane than any of TC’s idosycrocies.

Giants struggle again next year and don’t improve fine put TC on the hotseast but he deserves another shot at winning a SB.

by Landeta on Dec 28, 2009 3:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Gruden's team

the Raiders from the late 1990’s – early 2000’s were just as good as the Buccaneer team Dungy made except Gruden still knew all of their plays / audibles. That is why they blew them out.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Dec 28, 2009 6:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Loss of defensive leadership

In 2007 we won and had Strahan and Pierce in that defensive backfield. I remember watching Mike go up and down that bench firing up that defense to hold that score just before NE got the ball back in the final seconds. 2008 we lost Strahan and Pierce was the man in the backfield. We did darn good with his experience to make defensive adjustments. Philly hurt us in the end, but we had a solid base to build on. 2009 we lost spags and Pierce still did his job and kept that defense in most every game he played. In my view we lost it when Pierce went down for the season. Those guys looked lost out there most of the time. I do not think TC is the issue. We got hurt in some major on field leadership positions. I think too many guys were looking to Sheridan for a magic fix to loosing Pierce. We were not that deep, even though Pierce at times seemed to be loosing a step or two, he still is a master at reading offenses and changing the defense on the fly. No one else could do that after he left. What makes Eli, Peyton, and Brady great is their ability to read a defense and adjust. No different on defense, our season was all but over when Pierce went out. It is TC’s job to fix it, so in that sense he is on the hot seat as he should be.

by GiantYankee on Dec 28, 2009 3:28 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

this post

wound up over on the fannation forums under the osi post too.

by cntrlalt on Dec 28, 2009 3:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

TC can stay

He’s the man. You armchair quarterbacks are flying off the handle. Changes will be made on defense and we’ll be back in the playoffs again next year. Then you “fire TC” guys will be all over his nuts again. A little fan loyalty for a man that’s taken us to the playoffs 5 straight years would be nice. You could always look for another bandwagon to jump on.

by gametime56 on Dec 28, 2009 4:25 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Correct me if I'm wrong...

But wasn’t Tom Coughlin’s goals were to improve special teams play and also keep penalties low? I thought he was a stickler for those things. I too believe that he should keep his job, but even if the defense played to the level that it should have this year, then he should still be on the hotseat for the penalties and turnovers that the team has created.

by Well-Rounded Cube on Dec 28, 2009 4:40 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

TC has had his honeymoon already

It was last year after Plax shot himself and the team went south. That was the time for leadership. That was the time for decisiveness. That was the time for adaptation and meaningful change. And I repeat, that was the time for leadership. But there was none. And so a year that should’ve seen us in the Super Bowl went down the tubes but we all had the built-in, ready-made excuse of Plax. That terrible end to last season, to me was TC’s honeymoon after the Super Bowl win the year before.
And now this year – 5-0 start – followed by 0-4 – and then the 3-3 (soon to be 3-4) end. Almost 400 points given up. The cracks were there to see in the 0-4 slide; heck, they were there in the 5-0 start if you looked closely enough. But to talk of TC not returning is absurd. To think of his firing is crazy. I beg to differ. To keep TC is absurd. To not fire him is crazy.
We’ll gladly sacrifice Sheridan and bid Gilbride goodbye as well. But TC, no. He MUST stay is the call around here. Somehow TC is not connected in any way to Sheridan or Gilbride. He stands alone, a breed apart.
The Romans had it right when it came to accountability. Losing generals fell on their swords. They didn’t talk about field conditions and injuries and officiating. They knew that ultimately they, the field general, were responsible. TC is responsible, TC is accountable, TC MUST GO.

One last add: Look at the face or faces of this franchise (especially in New York where image or the perception of that image matters) – Eli Manning and Tom Coughlin.
Eli is the absence of personality, the Kid from Deliverance, the youngest child with the forgotten middle child’s personality. And Tom Coughlin is the red-faced angry old man, head cocked as he tries hard but can’t quite understand this brave new world he finds himself in. These are the faces and the personalities of our New York Giants. Of course the team is schizophrenic. Their QB, their nominal leader and their brother on the field has nothing to say while the coach always looks like somebody’s disapproving dad.

by giantsfootballbaseball on Dec 28, 2009 4:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

i'm sorry...what?

this post is all kinds of weird. we’ve debated ad naseum the merits of keeping coughlin so i won’t dive back into that.

but are you really laying this on the feet of eli? are you disregarding his stellar play because he has a drab personality? right…because phil simms is king charisma.

by cntrlalt on Dec 28, 2009 5:51 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

i also love

how this is a city that MURDERS eli because he’s too uninteresting, he always says the right things and lets his play on the field do the talking for him yet derek jeter is a baseball god for the exact same type of personality.

by cntrlalt on Dec 28, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I'm not interested in your debate

Clearly BBV is pro-TC. I simply wanted to offer a differing opinion and please excuse me if I hadn’t read every other post above mine. And no, I am not laying anything at the feet of Eli. I simply made mention of him in regards to the face/faces of the Giants franchise. Repeat, I am laying nothing at the feet of Eli which is made clear in my writing.
But I will respond to your Jeter/Eli comparison. As for Jeter and Eli there is simply no comparison. Jeter is going directly to the HOF while Eli is at best, a middle-of-the pack QB. And the games they play are vastly different – baseball is all about consistency over an incredibly long haul in which emotion is meant to be kept in check, while football is an emotional game in which a 3 hour spike in one’s emotions can mean the difference between winning and losing. The play Eli is most famous for really is a catch by David Tyree. The plays that Jeter will be remembered for – the toss to the plate to get the A’s baserunner/the headfirst dive into the stands to catch the pop fly – those two come to mind immediately. Jeter is a leader, looked up to by opponents and teammates alike. Eli is the blank face of a leaderless team. And I am not the first person to call the Giants leaderless. It’s been talked about for weeks.

by giantsfootballbaseball on Dec 28, 2009 6:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Jeter seriously

I love the yanks but baseball in a farce, 10 teams can legitametly compete every year and no team is on the Yankess level when it comes to signing FA. Jeter won 5 WS becasue the Yankess bought pitching. THats it., not becasue of the greatness of Derrick Jeter. Yes he played great when given the opprotunity but when you’re in the playoffs 14 of the 15 years you play you’re bound to make a few big plays especailly when your’re first round oppent in the playoffs(Twins) or (A’s) are basically really good minor league teams, just look at ARod this year. If Jeter was drafted by the KC Royals he would never of have won a WS until the Yankess or Red Sox signed him as a FA later in his carrerr. He would not be considered the ultimate “winner”

Jeter is emotionless, cool and calm kinda like Eli. It’s almost impossible to compare the two but your’re saying Jeter is the ultimate winner and Eli is not becasue he only has one Super Bowl to Jeters 5 rings. You can’t even compare the sports.

Yes football is emotional but not if your a QB, as a leader he needs to stay calm and keep his emotions in check like he did in SB 42. If 9-14 for 150 yards and two TD’s with no picks in the 4th quartter of a SB is not a clutch permance than I don’t know what is. I want my LB’s and D-Lineman playing with raw emotion not my QB he needs to be steady.

I don’t understand what people want out of Eli. Everybody thinks he sucks, Giants fans included. Watch guys like Jay CUtler or Jason Cambell week in week out and you’ll see middle of the road QB play. I guess he has to throw for 4,000 yards and win 3to5 SB’s to be considered any good, it’s absurd.

by Landeta on Dec 28, 2009 10:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Why do you post on a blog if not to debate?

someone has a high regard for their own lofty thoughts. They are important enough to be stated, but not challenged I guess. Well, forgive my impertinent tone, but please deign to answer a simple question. For Eli to be “middle of the pack” there must be 10-12 QB’s better than him. Please find me 10-12 qb’s who have had numbers as consistently high as his for the last six years, WHILE showing improvement four of the six years. Go ahead, I’ll wait. If you think Eli is not a leader you really should read more press clippings from the giants team.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Dec 29, 2009 2:23 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed

Tom Coughlin should not be fired. It is clearly the fault of Bill Sheridan and Kevin Gilbride. They are both virtually incompetent.

Bill Sheridan’s defense only stopped teams that majority of the rest of the league could stop. Yes, you can argue that there were MANY injuries to the line and secondary. However, the same thing happened last year, but Steve Spagnuolo capitalized on the talent he had and worked around them. Both Sheridan and Gilbride don’t know how to work with what they have, they only know the canned plays they have come up with.

Another example of this is when Plaxico went out last year. Gilbride replaced him with Hixon, which could have been fine, but everyone knows that Hixon is significantly shorter than Plaxico. You cannot count on Hixon being successful with the same plays Burress was, they don’t have the same abilities. Gilbride only seemed to plug in Hixon where Burress was and never thought to change anything, thus leading to failure time and again.

What made me dislike Bill Sheridan was the Saints game. Yes, I understand the Saints have a very high powered offense. However, he NEVER blitzed. The only way to kill the snake is to cut off its head…in that case, that was Drew Brees. He NEVER got to Brees once. This is a D line FULL of Pro Bowlers and All Pro linemen, and you’re telling me you can’t get to Drew Brees? Others clearly have. Then, the Giants made Jonathan Stewart look like Barry Sanders. While Jonathan Stewart is definitely good, that defensive performance was unacceptable as well.

Obviously, with the right coordinators, Coughlin won a Super Bowl. If he could do it once, he can do it again. So fire the coordinators and start over!!!

by jf0417 on Dec 28, 2009 5:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I have been saying this forever

Coughlin is the most over rated coach. Besides the 07 SB season he’s been FULL of short comings. In fact, besides that season the Giants haven’t won a playoff game, and I think Reese wsas to blame more than Coughlin for the season’s failures, I think theres much better candidates out there than Coughlin.

E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!

by Joe_D on Dec 28, 2009 7:16 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

TC hired Spags

he deserves credit for that. Just like he gets killed for hiring Sheridan this year but he actually wanted Dom Capers but the Giants organization does not belive in paying assistant coaches a lot of money so off the GB Capers went and with same talent they’ve drastcally improved their talend

by Landeta on Dec 28, 2009 10:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hear that kind of comment a lot, Joe,

which leads me to believe he’s is by and large underrated, particularly considering what I belive is his greatest success—as coach and GM getting the expansion Jaguars to the AFC title game in two years, an unprecedented achievement.

by blue gonz on Dec 28, 2009 10:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not saying hes a dud

Like a Cam Cameron type coach. He’s done some good things, but over rated.

E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!

by Joe_D on Dec 29, 2009 3:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yea I hear that a lot

besides that Super Bowl run and playoff appearance’s he has’nt done much. Well gee wiz is’nt that why you hire a coach to win a SB? So Spags was responsible for Eli turining around his performance in the 07 playoffs? Spags was responsible for an offense that averaged 26 points per game and 165 rushing yards per game in 08. TC was responsible for the Giants best player shooting himself in the leg late in the year which killed a legit repeat chance? Who’s a better option, Wade Phillips, Jim Zorn, Brad Childress, Jack DelRio? You can’t say some unkown assistant is a better option becasue well he’ unknown. Gruden not sure he won many playoff games other than that one run in 02 and according to you one SB run really does not count. Bill Cowher maybe but he lost a ton of big playoff games and it took him a long time to win a SB. Shannahan, very good offesive coach but his defenses always sucked and since Elway left he won very few playoff games. I would say Shannahan relied on Elway just as much if not more than TC relied on Spags so according to you Shannahan really did not have much to do with those back to back Bronco Super Bowls. If Couglin is overrated than the “much better canidates” are equallay overrrated.

Also how is he overrated? He got credit for winning a SB, oh thats crazy. What media outlet gushes about TC being a brilliant coach? Most media types piss on him becasue he’s not personable. Nobody puts him in the Bellicheck class nor did people put him in the class of Toney Dungey. Nobody is even calling him a HOF coach he is regarded as a very good coach how is that overrated for a guy with his track record? Oh he’s the Giants coach so well yea he must be overrated I guess Parcells was overrated too becasue he only won SB’s with Bellicheck as an assistant. Sure everybody that has ever played or coached for the Giants is overrated becasue they’re from NY . . . oh yea I get it now makes perfect sense.

by Landeta on Dec 28, 2009 11:14 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Because of the defense

And the offense was propped up by Plaxico. Should I even count the Ws and L’s since Plaxico shot himself? It’s well under .500. The defense at the time was stopping everyone and everything in their path, and that was all because of Spags. I think Reese had a phenominal year too. Draft was a huge success that year and so were the FAs.. 2 years later, Plax gets shot and the team doesn’t go on to even win another playoff game.

I don’t care if he’s personable or not, I love how Andy is a monotone guy. But look at the facts here.

E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!

by Joe_D on Dec 29, 2009 3:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

And the Eagles O was not proped up by TO in 05 and by D-Jax this year? What facts are you looking at?

they are sub .500 without Plax. Sure I’ll admit his loss killed them in 08 and our loses to the Eagles had a lot to do with his absecense but take away the best player on any team in the middle of the year and see how they end up. How did the Eagles do in 05 when TO unexpectiadly went over the edge, 6-10 right? it’s tough to replace a player of such high caliber in the middle of a season. TC did not do it neither did Andy Ried nor would many coaches you can’t kill him for that. How long did it take for the Eagles to rebuilt that O, they had a little run in 06 but the Eagles O more or less was wildely inconsitant until realy the middle of this year when well what do you know they got a legit Superstar wideout that came into his own own. I’m not rippng Ried I think he’s a fine coach I’m just pointing out he struggled in a similar situation.

2009’s struggles had nothing to do with PLax not being here, I think you watch too much ESPN and look at what the easy answers are. The D sucked this year. Thats it, sure the O had it’s struggles but the D was god-awful. If the D was what it was a year ago this team wins probabbly 3 more games and is in the playoffs.

My point is you say he is overrated, by who? Who overrates him? Local and national media hate him for the most part and look to kill him whenever they get a chance so who overrates him? Giants fans? Sorry unlike a lot of Eagles fans we aprrecaite a coach thats had success and don’t look for every oppotunity to run him out of the building. He’s coached for 14 years has been to the playoffs 8 times has taken his teams to 3 conference championships and won a SB those are the facts thats the resume of a very good coach. Nothing more nothing less. I just think you’re an Eagle fan that hates everything about the Giants and is looking for any opportunity to stick it to them

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 5:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Don't forget the great job he did At BC, L

Also, he has integrity. When Parcells left, the Giants first choice to replace him was TC. He turned the job down because of committments he’d made to BC. Nobody calls TC an elite coach or gives him the kind of praise heaped on Bellichick or Parcells, for example, but his denigration seems universal outside Giants cirvles and even there appreciation of him is far from unanimous. IMO, he’s clearly underrated and certainly not overrated.

by blue gonz on Dec 29, 2009 6:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

no

Thats not true. Im not looking to bash the giants at every angle. I do hate th giants but the fact is what has TC done besides the 07 season that largely hinged on the defensive line play and a miracle catch by tyree?

Hes been bounced out of the playoffs every year and this year he’s put together one of the worst Giant teams we’ve seen in a long time. That Carolina game was pitiful. He obviously lost the locker room, they mailed it in on him already.

E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!

by Joe_D on Dec 29, 2009 8:12 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

just like he lost the locker room in 06

again watching too much ESPN . .. .easy answer. How come they came out and steamrolled Washington the previous week? TC all of the sudden in the span of a week lost the locker room after beating a divisional oppent 45-12 to keep his teams playoff hopes alive? That makes zero sense. The loss this past weekend was problematic of what’s happenend all year little of it has to do with TC losing the locker room, yes some of its on him but that just makes a nice story and is an easy answer to a horrible unexplainable loss.

No offense but what has he done other than win a SB is a silly statement that a lot of people who a.) Hate the Giants like to bring up and b.) Hate TC like to bring up. He won it case closed. His other playoff failures do not negate his SB win, I know a lot of Eagle fans think that way but it does’nt. He finished the job. Thats what he was hired to do. A lot of very good coaches would trade in some other accomplishments for a SB win.

A lot of SB runs “hinge” on certain things It hinged on D-Line play and a miracle catch. Well what did the Steelers SB win last year hindge on. Great defensive play a miracle endzone catch and a freakish pick six in which 6 guys wiffed on tackles. What did the Pats first SB win hinge on big special teams plays to win the AFC championship and a boatload of turnovers to beat the Rams. What did the Broncos 97 SB run hindge on, dominating o-line play and sub-par effort from the 97 NFL MVP (Favre) What did the Eagles 08 playoff run hinge on a freaky late season collapse by the Bucs that included a 4th quarter meltdown against the worst QB in the league in their last game and the Eagles biggest rival lossing their best player to a self inflicted gunshot wound. I could go on and on but I hope you see the point. If the Eagles win a SB this year lets say 27-23 over SD and D-Jax returns a punt for a TD and catches a 50 yard TD but Philly does very little outside of that won’t that SB title and hell most of this season “hinge” on D-Jax making big plays? (I hate to say it but I think that might happen this year)

You also say outside that SB run he’s been bounced from the playoffs, true with the Giants, but you can’t ignore what he did in JAX if you are to evaluate him fairly, those years count too. Lets see in 96 he took the wild card Jags to the conference title game that included a shocking upset of the one seed Broncos. One and done in 97 to eventual SB champ Broncos, 1-1 in 98 1-1 in 99 with a 62-7 dismantling of the Miami Dolphins but a dissapointing conference title loss to the Titans. Hell outside of that 05 playoff loss to the Panthers which was disgusting the two losses to the Eagles were tough hard fought games that he should not be curcified for. In 06 they were beat up and battered and forced the game to OT it could of gone either way last year even without Plax they beat anybody in the NFC but the Eagles that was the only team that was going to beat them without Plax. Thats why I was the only guy rooting for Dallas to get in the last weekend of the season. And the playoff game last year “Hindged” on two great efforts to save a special teams TD and a pick six one by Akers on the opening kickoff and the other by Curtis to stop Robbins after a pick and it hinged on a pick by Samuel that was returned to the one to set up an easy TD. Change those 3 plays and its a different ball game so how is TC responsible for a great effort from the oppenet and a bad pass? So he won 4 playoff games including a SB, lost two tough hard fought games to a brutally tough division rival who has been one of the most consistant teams in the NFL this decade with a top flight coach and QB(I know Garcia was the QB in 06 but he was very good too) and one horrible loss to Carolina that there is no defense of.

And please answer the question who overates him? I would love to know becasue he is one of the most critisized coaches out there. I have never heard him called a great coach. He rarley gets called a very good coach which he is based on his track record. The Jaguars were one of the best teams of the 90’s in the AFC and the Giants have been one of the best teams in the NFC in the 2000’s and he won a SB. Sure maybe it’s close to the end for him we’ll see next year but even if he is he’s been a very good coach in this league. Please tell me who overrates him? Based on all of the facts it’s hard for me to believe any bashing of this guy is nothing more than people that hate him or hate the Giants.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 9:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Whoa, Joe,

that narrative does make him sound like a dud, not just overrated. My response to that is he’s underrated. Look, he’s certainly not an innovator, like a Walsh or an Owens, nor is he a charismatic sort like Parcells or Lombardi, nor is he a heroic grind like Bellichick, but he’s a good coach.

by blue gonz on Dec 29, 2009 9:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Worst Giant Teams?

At worst their 8-8 maybe 9-7 the way the Vikes are playing. I would say the 03 4-12 Fassel Giants were worse and they truley mailed it in. Maybe the worst defensive teams the Giants have had in 30 years but not worst teams. They were in the playoff hunt until the final week. Most inconsistant? Yea definatley? Overrated in the preseason? Sure why not but if your definition of a long time is 5 years than sure they are the worst Giants team in a long time.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 10:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh and and you blame TC for the defensive collapse

and say any success he had was all Spags. Well they won the division in 05 without Spags. By that theory than Andy Reid must be very overrated becasue the Eagles late charge in 08 had little to do with their O, the D played great and carried them as the O was inconsistant so I guess last seasons run was more on JJ than Ried. In fact other than this year and 04 most of the Reid led Eagle teams have been not been great ofensive teams the defenses have been what the Eagles are about.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

sure i can agree with that to some extent

except reid has consistently winning p layoff games…

E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!

by Joe_D on Dec 29, 2009 8:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes Reid has won playoff games

but he’s been awful in conference champioship games. Look I’m not looking to kill Reid he’s a hell of a coach and will win a SB at some point but you can’t be criticle of TC for not winning playoff games dismiss his SB title and his time in Jacksonville and then talk about Reids playoff success and ignore how Reid has struggled mightely in one particular round of the playoffs. Again I’m not trying to throw salt in a wound to trash talk cause I think Reid is very good I’m just pointing out the facts as of today.

A lot of very good coaches don’t have good playoff records, Reid is the rare bird that has a winning playoff record without a SB tittle so he is the expection to the rule so I think you’re looking at things through an Eagles fans perspective when comparing playoff reocrds of coaches.

Tony Dungy is 9-10 with a SB in the playoffs TC is 8-7 with a SB nothing legendary but very good
Ried is 10-7 definatly better than the other two above but it’s not like TC is awful he does have a winning playoff record. And I’m sure you would take TC’s 8-7 and SB title over Reid 10-7 with no SB.

I actually think Reid will get his this year, the NFC is falling apart and SD or INDY do not have great D’s nor do they have great coaches so I’m sure I’ll eat my words thats why I don’t want to be put in a position to rip Reid he’s very good at what he does and will win one soon.

by Landeta on Dec 29, 2009 10:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Again, who is better than Coughlin?

More statements without alternative suggestions given.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Dec 29, 2009 2:24 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Joe...

you’d probably want that so you can cross the Giants of as one of the Eagles competition every year.

This is the problem for the Redskins.

Even if Coughlin was mediocre..he’s stability.

He’s not mediocre.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 29, 2009 12:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I never said mediocre

But I think he’s over rated.

E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!

by Joe_D on Dec 29, 2009 3:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm thinking...

if he’s overrated….Big Red must be too.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 29, 2009 5:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

How

8 playoff apperances in 10 years. We didn’t win the big one yet, but we win p layoff games.We’re not just a flash in the pan..

E-A-G-L-E-S EAGLES!!!

by Joe_D on Dec 29, 2009 8:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Ok...

Couglin hasn;t been with the Giants for 10 years.

He’s got 4 playoff appearances in 6 years.

And as far as I’m concerned…even if ya win a playoff game or 2..and you don’t get to the SB..who the hell cares anyway!?

The Eagles got to the Bowl once in 10 years of Reid. The Giants 1 time in 6 years of Coughlin.

The Giants won the Bowl..the Eagles didn’t.

Far as I’m concerned, getting to the NFC Championship game and getting knocked out…not all that much better then getting knocked out in round 1.

Yea..you get teh better chance..but all it is is closer to 2nd place.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 29, 2009 10:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If Coughlin and the Giants

won one extra playoff game in those years they made the playoffs and then got knocked out…IMO it makes not much of a difference.

It was one or 2 extra games…but no champ.

Actually..this kinda proves Ried is overrated..cuz he gets to the Champ. game and not the Bowl.

All it is, is a shorter offseason.

"It ain't over till its over"---

3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.

"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 29, 2009 10:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

4 playoffs, 6 years

Plus one nice shiny ring.

Comparable career stats, except Coughlin started off with an expansion team, and his first year here was a complete rebuilding year (Eli’s rookie year).

And how can you say we’re a flash in the pan?

How would your offense be if Jackson shot himself in the leg?

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 30, 2009 9:52 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

That dude is a

bitter arrogant Eagles fan, look at the exchange I had with him up the page a bit, I’m long winded as usaul but I break down the facts. . . He just watches ESPN and listens to what idotic talking heads are saying.

by Landeta on Dec 30, 2009 10:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Joe D's been here quite a few times

Which is why it surprised me so much he was saying those things.

He usually has better points/debates than that

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

When there's a WILL there's a WAY

by Willgfass on Dec 30, 2009 11:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

training camp

Ive been reading coughlins book and he talks about how games r won inh august. My sense is we did not have a great training camp as some key guys were injured see: nicks, if he wasnt hurt he would be roy, canty, boley, and ross

by feaglesmvp on Dec 28, 2009 8:12 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
SB Nation Survey + Chance to donate $500 to a charity of this community's choice

Recent FanPosts

Small
Giant Nomad Mock Draft Pt. 1
4658_213619215376_212641675376_7018935_5508931_n_small
GIANTS HELMET....
Small
Mock Draft Time Part 2
Small
Blue Gates Mock Pt.2 (rounds 5-7)
Small
Mock Draft Time Part 1
Small
Blue Gates Mock Pt.1 ( rounds 1-4)
Small
Season prediction for 2010-2011 season
Small
Jahvid BEST - Player Available...
Lt_small
Shawn Andrews

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

The Phinsider
Report: Dolphins RB Ronnie Brown arrested on Friday
Dawgs By Nature
2010 DBN Big Board
Mocking The Draft
Shake's 3/21 Mock Draft

SPONSORS

Get Your Giants' Gear

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo link

Report: Dolphins RB Ronnie Brown Arrested On Friday

Photo

Mike Holmgren On Jimmy Clausen: 'It Would Be Hard For Me To Take Him'

Photo link

Pacman Jones' Workout With Lions Reportedly Goes Well

More from SBNation.com >


Editor-In-Chief

Bigblueview_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Blueshirt_banter_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Small brisulph

Authors

Tyree_believe_small cjmulrain