It's Friday, so Ernie P. is in the house
It's Friday. That, of course, means our weekly swap of questions with the venerable Ernie Palladino. I can call him that because Ernie, I think, is a couple years older than I am. Which means neither one of us are spring chickens.
Anyway, watching the Giants flounder around and under-perform is also getting old. With that in mind, here are Ernie's answers to this week's amazing questions. Check out my answers over at Giants Beat.
1. Tom Coughlin said he will not fire defensive coordinator Bill Sheridan despite his obvious flaws. Is Coughlin showing too much loyalty to an underachieving coach?
Ernie's Answer: I'm not sure if it's a matter of loyalty or timing. Regardless of what happened to John Hufnagel at the end of the 2006 season, it's very difficult to fire a coordinator in mid-season. Buffalo tried it this year, and look what happened? And what would the new guy do, anyway? Tear up the playbook and start over? That would be impossible. So what we're really left with at this point is change for change's sake, and Coughlin is really not that kind of a guy. He could demote Sheridan and put Pete Giunta there, and maybe the DBs coach would infuse a sense of aggression into a defense that has been forced to play Cover-2. That might help, but at this point I'm not confident these corners can get their hands on any receiver at the line of scrimmage. That's all the Giants need, a bunch of corners missing jams so even more receivers can run free down the sidelines. For now, Coughlin will have to make do, and then find someone in the offseason like a Dave Campo or John Fox for a full makeover.
2. With playoff hopes hinging on how the Cowboys fare over the next three games, do you think the Giants will continue to play hard?
Ernie's Answer: They'd better. They're still very much in this playoff race. Look, the Cowboys have to play at New Orleans and at Washington, and then they get Philadelphia at home. Who here can honestly not see the chances of Dallas going 1-2 over that stretch to finish at 9-7? If you've raised your hand, you're either a liar, a maverick, or an idiot. That's a tough road, far tougher than the Giants' road to 9-7 against Washington, Carolina, and a coasting (probably) Minnesota. Now that Atlanta has all but fallen out of the race, the only thing standing between the Giants and the sixth seed as we stand now are the second-place Cowboys. It's way too early to throw in the towel on the season. However, if the Giants lose to Washington and Dallas somehow pulls off a miracle in New Orleans, then it's a different story. But it hasn't happened yet, and that's cause enough to get up for Monday night's game at FedEx Field.
3. Would you elevate Ramses Barden from the inactive list, even if Coughlin only uses him in Red Zone situations?
Ernie's Answer: Actually, I thought that should have been the case all season. Seems there was no room for him on special teams, so he got caught up in the numbers game. Well, you can see where that got the Giants. The coverage teams stink, the return teams are so-so, and Eli Manning is left to throw fades to Mario Manningham, who lost his feel for the sideline around mid-season. They could use a long, tall drink of water in the corner of that end zone now. And since these three are must-win games -- assuming the goal is to play past Jan. 3 and damned the development for next season -- then they really should get Barden up and playing. It couldn't hurt.
4. Should Hakeem Nicks continue to start in place of Mario Manningham?
Ernie's Answer: Absolutely. This kid has made such an impact on the offense, it's unbelievable. Every time he gets out there, he's good for at least one big play per game, usually resulting in a touchdown. He's obviously a fast learner, unlike Manningham. And also unlike Manningham, he knows how to stay inbounds while fighting for a ball. That's the beauty of this kid. He not only catches the imperfect pass, but he turns and runs with it after he catches it. He'll make the occasional drop, as he did twice against the Eagles, but you can easily forgive him for those when Manning comes right back to him and he makes a spectacular catch. Doubt his explosiveness? His 38 catches for 685 yards works out to an 18-yard average, and his six touchdowns lead the team. I know the Orakpo kid in Washington is making a heck of an impact as a pass rusher, but Nicks has my vote for Rookie of the Year. Can't wait to see him starting a full season with Steve Smith, which should happen in 2010.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hicks
I agree with Ernie, Hicks has been a phenomenal rookie. He’s certainly lived up to expectations in my opinion.
Nicks
Let’s at least learn the guy’s name!
by SonictheHedgecock on Dec 18, 2009 11:26 AM EST up reply actions
Are we
talking about Nakeem Hicks? Domenik Nixon? Hakeem Dixon? I’m sooooo confused!
by Ed Valentine on Dec 18, 2009 2:53 PM EST up reply actions
Christmas sale, free shipping discounts are beautifully gift
http://www.kkshoe.com
Hello, dear ladies and gentlemen,
Buy now proposed a "Christmas gift ’. A rare
opportunity, what are you waiting for? Quickly move
your mouse bar.
Activities As of December 26
commodity is credit guarantee, you can rest assured of
purchase, kkshoe will provide service for you all,
welcome to
1. sport shoes : Jordan ,Nike, adidas, Puma, Gucci, LV,
UGG , etc. including women shoes and kids shoes.
2. T-Shirts : BBC T-Shirts, Bape T-Shirts, Armani T-
Shirts, Polo T-Shirts,etc.
3. Hoodies : Bape hoody, hoody, AFF hoody, GGG hoody,
ED hoody ,etc.
4. Jeans : Levis jeans , Gucci jeans, jeans, Bape jeans
, DG jeans ,etc.For details, please consult , -—
I would love to see some more of Barden in the redzone
Even if he is raw he should at least be able to catch some fades in the end zone, which has been a problem for us this year. Boss and Barden would make a formidable combo in the green zone, add in Nicks and Smith and the defense would have there hands full.
More of?
outside of preseason have we seen Barden? Boss is a viable red zone threat. I don’t understand why the Giants do utilize him more in the entire passing game.
With HAM's faults becoming more of a problem...
and Hagen on ST obviously not doing anything…yea, its about time Ramses suited up.
Ramses could get away with not running as good a route as HAM..cuz he can go up and get it at a higher point.
Lets see if #13 can do something. NOW is the time.
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
Would I be an idiot to Ernie...
if I raised my hand and said the Cowboys would go 0-3 to end up at 8-8?
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
We would still
need to win one game to make the playoffs if that happened!
by G Fan in England on Dec 18, 2009 11:28 AM EST up reply actions
Ernie is now my hero...
I’ve been clamouring for Barden all year for Red Zone routes..Nicks as well (He finally got the chance and has been magnificent…I also agree we need a John Fox back..Althought I hadn’t thought about Campo..He’d be great also..Ernie hit the nail on the head with a very solid list (as usual) of questions from Ed.
He can be your hero
But, you better not leave!
by Ed Valentine on Dec 18, 2009 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
wow...bobbiblue...
you took the words straight outta my mouth.
Ernie did a great job…..Finally someone addresses the fact that our secondary is forced to play cover 2 zone. Yeah, we’ve used it in the past but never even close to this much.
here’s the thing….Ernie says the Corners can’t get the jam….but I say, they don’t even try. I do’nt know if Sheridan is doing it, or if they’re doing it….but they’re not even attempting to get a jam!
I agree 100% on Manningham/Nicks, and Barden.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Speaking of The Jam
wasn’t Thomas supposed to be a physical corner coming out of USC? It would seem that would suit his style, instead of ball-hawking and jumping routes. Watching them drop back in confusion is the bitterest pill I ever had to swallow.
I don't get it...
in ’07 when the giants faced GB and DAllas in the playoffs….they let Webster match up one on one w/ Driver and T.O.
Yes, Driver beat Webster when Webster went to jam him….it was a disaster. Web fell down and Driver took it like 90 yards for the score….but aside from that one play our defense played damn near excellent.
So my point is…yeah, you run the risk of getting burned…but you also put your corners in position to make plays © Webster’s INT that iced the game.
We all know these guys can jam WR’s….but they’re not even attempting to do so?!?!
either that’s coaching or our Corners forgot how to play football?!?!?!
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
I don't understand it either....
this team is not cover 2 material…these guys are man up cover corners.
Why the switch?
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
by FreeBradshaw on Dec 18, 2009 1:28 PM EST up reply actions
You raise a very good point here rzor..
Our secondary is very confused, they aren’t in synch with each other at all..simple case of the right-hand not knowing what the left-hand is doing..
Yes Andia, and if you caught the game last night..
The Jags were a prime example of just letting receivers loose off the LOS and they got burned, and that’s why they lost..they offered Peyton a ‘free buffet’ and he ate well..and speakin of Peyton Manning, he is the best ‘poker player’ QB I’ve ever seen he bluffs better than anyone!
GREAT
great eval on each question Ernie P.
id like to add that we have heard NOTHING from moss.. i was a big believer this preseason in Moss making a impace.. all the stories and blogs from practices that he was burning the defense deep.. that wasnt due to moss great athletic ability.. but to sheridans weak pass defense
moss has had no impact on special teams so lets get ramses in there in goal line.. get a 4 wr set and make something happen.
Barden....
as much as I want to see him play….it’s really tough. our special teams is a shell of it’s former self.
If we had a stronger unit than i could see activating Barden so he doesn’t even have to contribute, but that’s not the case. I suppose if the season was lost we coudl do it, but we’re still in it, so to hurt our special teams play only to get barden in the game is a pretty big trade.
too bad we can’t work it were we can deactivate Hagan and let someone else play Gunner so Barden doesn’t have to. But who???
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
special teams has been inconsistent, correct...but...
…when you look at our big plays on special teams, Derek Hagan has been right there. If you need proof, check the replay of Hixon’s big play against the ’Boys…
by Step up and make big plays on Dec 18, 2009 2:09 PM EST up reply actions
I know STAMBP
that’s why i said it’s too bad…it’s too bad we can’t deactivate him b/c he’s too important.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
point taken....
but when it comes to our WR’s who play Special Teams.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
sorry...hit enter too soon...
but when it comes to our WR’s who play Special Teams.
Hagan is much better than Barden is in that regard.
so that’s why i was wondering if we could deactivate Hagan…just for maybe one game and let someone else play gunner (Dockery, Rouse, Beckum) so this way Barden can take Hagan’s spot at WR.
Of course this would all be contingent on the Giants actually playing barden and throwing him the ball…if we’re not gonna do it, than why bother.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Oh yes I see your point..of your three gunner choices I think I like Rouse..But
Your also right in that if they don’t throw Barden the ball, why bother..However he would be one rather large target for defenses to deal with..can’t go single-coverage on that guy in a Red Zone situation..plus he’d draw LBs attention, and maybe those daggone running plays down there would open up..I’ll guarantee you if Barden burns a team one time for six..then it will change the whole way in which teams play us inside the twenty.
I agree with you guys, and Ernie about Barden
But given the pecking order, Smith, Nicks, Ham and Hixon, they seldom use more than 3 WR’s, albeit sometimes 4, but thats it. So by activating Hagan, he essentially becomes the 5th WR off the bench, and w/ ST’s experience. Even though it’s not right (our ST’s are porous anyways) it’s his flexibility i would presume that the Giants would prefer? Given that he is a veteran of sorts, it’s the idea that if they needed him in a pinch, he would be available.
I also think they could mask Hagan’s absence if he was not on ST’s. Like you guys have mentioned, Dockery, Rouse and Beckum. I would throw CC or Bruce Johnson in there also. Besides our CB’s, the S positions have been a revolving door, so why not try something different on ST’s?!
maybe it's time
to make Manningham inactive and not Hagan. He’s not on specials either and if he’s not going to start then he’s the only logical dude to sit.
no way Manningham is an important part of the team
hes young as well, he needs all the snaps he can get.
Hagan and Dockery are our gunners at the moment so they have to be active. I think the best way to get Barden on the field is to deactive one of the LB’s that play in the middle of the special teams
by mclaren_is_the_best on Dec 18, 2009 5:40 PM EST up reply actions
logical?
Seriously? Manningham sitting is logical?
While he;’s not finishing plays….sitting him is not gonna help him.
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"
by FreeBradshaw on Dec 18, 2009 8:05 PM EST up reply actions
not that I want to sit Mannigham
but the way the team is constructed is the only way to get him on the field IMO.
there's more than a few ways to activate Barden.
I doubt that he’d do much worse than guys like Hagen, Beckum or Ware on ST. These 3 are absent from the offense.
The ST sucks anyway…what are we missing by taking out these guys?
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"
by FreeBradshaw on Dec 19, 2009 9:47 AM EST up reply actions
Nicks
should start over Mario. However, Mario should not be inactive for Barden to be activated. MM has made some big plays. Yes, he had a tough game but we know what he brings. Barden is an unknown commodity.
agree...
there’s no reason to inactivate HAM.
Beckum’s been activated the past few games…yet, absent in the offense. Could it be as simple as deactivating Becks and putting in Barden?
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
by FreeBradshaw on Dec 18, 2009 1:29 PM EST up reply actions
Deactivating Beckum
Leaves you with 2 active TE which is a problem cause if anything happens to Hedgecock or one of the active in game you’re down to 1 active guy in TE position. Also Beckum plays on Specials as well. Either Hixon or Manningham has to sit for Beckum to get on the team and Hixon just had a huge punt return to help win a game and a big catch in a loss while Ham is bitching about people complaining about his crappy route rinning.
Beckum doesn't play anyway...
there’s no difference. He’s been inactive a whole lot too…
I could care less what Manningham says in ONE SENTENCE.
Why do people take ONE SENTENCE from what a guy says into a microphone so seriously all the time.
Manningham should not sit. He should be frustrated at what he did…
"It ain't over till its over"---
3rd down + Steve Smith = 1st Down.
"I just saw Avatar, and Sean Avery was hands down the best character!"
by FreeBradshaw on Dec 18, 2009 8:03 PM EST up reply actions
It still may be the best option though
keep in mind if they do activate Barden and actually plan on using him as a WR it may only be in the red zone. Although I would like to see him at all times…this is something the giants may consider. So If thats the case it would be wise to use MM on plays not inside the red zone.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Perish the thought of bringing in a Cowboy re-tread like Dave Campo...
by Step up and make big plays on Dec 18, 2009 2:07 PM EST reply actions
Campo would be fine, if he can get players to---
Step up and make big plays!!!
Nicks has exceded my expectations
considering I was expecting him to miss all of training camp with a quad injury and be inactive for most of the regular seaon like most Giants rookie WR’s.

by 



















