'Kudos & Wet Willies:' Rough day for Giants fans edition
This morning's 'Kudos & Wet Willies' is not exactly fun to do. Sunday's game is one the Giants should have won, it just didn't happen.
The season is hardly over. A lot can happen in seven more games, and I still believe the Giants can be a playoff team. They certainly have no more margin for error, though.
Anyway, on with the 'Kudos & Wet Willies.' I'm sure some of my choices today will generate some disagreement.
'Kudos' to ..
- Eli Manning: Well, we have a lot to complain about today. The play of Manning is not one of those things, however.
- The Defensive Line: Big plays from Osi Umenyiora, Justin Tuck, Mathias Kiwanuka and Fred Robbins. This group didn't always get to Philip Rivers, but they were in attack mode all day. The Chargers only totaled 34 yards rushing, largely due to improved work by the front four.
- Terrell Thomas: Nine tackles and what should have been a game-clinching interception.
- Bruce Johnson: It was nice to see Johnson on the field in passing situations instead of Kevin Dockery, and Johnson paid dividends by breaking up a trio of passes when Rivers and the Chargers tested him.
- Steve Smith: Eight catches, including one for a touchdown and a few more third-down grabs. Smith continues to be the guy Eli can rely on when he needs to complete a pass.
- Mario Manningham: Six catches and no drops for Manningham. The Giants really no longer have an issue at wide receiver, and Manningham is a big part of the reason why.
- Kevin Boss: You just have to love this guy. How much tougher could be be? A brilliant catch early in the game when he got absolutely crushed coming across the middle of the field. I know my first thought was 'concussion.' Yet, there he was making a touchdown reception in the fourth quarter to put the Giants ahead. He is, undeniably, one of my favorite Giants.
- Brandon Jacobs: Once again, Jacobs ran hard and well (11 carries, 67 yards, a 6.1 yards per carry average). Once again, though, probably not enough opportunities. Ahmad Bradshaw (14 carries, 39 yards, 2.8 YPC) wasn't getting it done, and I wish Jacobs had gotten more opportunities.
- Michael Boley: Seven tackles and a pass defensed in his return from knee surgery. When he has been healthy Boley has shown speed and athleticism the Giants linebacking group sorely needs.
- Kevin Gilbride: This one will send many of you into an outright uproar, I know that. But, I think the often-vilified offensive coordinator belongs here, anyway. The Giants put together two long, time-consuming drives, albeit we can argue about the wisdom of slamming Bradshaw up the middle on short yardage. KG used screens, play-action, slants, a reverse, a direct snap to Jacobs. Shoot, he even got Danny Ware in the game and got him the ball a couple of times. He pretty much emptied the tank. The conservative red/green zone series at the end is on Coughlin, not KG. That's the kind of game-changing decision that comes from the head coach.
'Wet Willies' to ...
- Tom Coughlin: The Giants played with heart, taking TC's "one-game season" pronouncement to heart and playing with a lot of emotion. Coughlin, though, is the head coach of a team that has gone seriously off track, and right now he doesn't seem to have the answers. Two questionable Coughlin decisions had a lot to do with Sunday's loss. First, the choice to run the ball up three points in the red zone with more than two minutes to play. Settling for the field goal, instead of trusting your star quarterback and going for the knockout blow, is a bad mistake. I have thought about this one a lot, and as much as I love TC not trusting Eli and going for the knockout blow is inexcusable. Also, don't forget that the Giants passed up a chance to go for it on 4th-and-1 at the San Diego 21 the first time they had the ball. That, of course, resulted in the botched field goal and no points.
- Corey Webster: We can stop now with the discussion of whether or not Webster should be considered an elite "shut down" corner back. Vincent Jackson (5 catches, 58 yards, 2 TDs) had his way with Webster Sunday. On the game-winning touchdown, Jackson beat Webster badly. C-Web didn't even seem to know the ball was in the air. That's awful. Maybe he should not have been in single coverage, but Webster is supposed to be one of the best cover corners in the league. A guy of his stature simply cannot get torched like that with the game on the line.
- The Special Teams: Week in and week out, the only thing 'special' about the Giants' special teams is how especially bad they are. As much as anything, horrible special teams play cost the Giants a victory Sunday. A botched field goal in which Lawrence Tynes didn't even try to kick it. Horrible punting by Jeff Feagles that left the Giants defending a short field the entire game, and a non-existent return game. Are we sure Sinorice Moss hasn't stolen Domenik Hixon's uniform? Kevin Dockery had a stupid penalty that handed the Chargers 15 yards. Hey, Kevin, how can you have no clue where the return man is?
- Bill Sheridan: I thought the defensive coordinator did a lot of good things Sunday. The defensive line was active. The Giants blitzed more, and did not sit back in 'prevent' on the last drive. The run defense was excellent. Having Michael Johnson and Aaron Rouse switch responsibilities worked out well. Bruce Johnson played a lot of nickel instead of Kevin Dockery or C.C. Brown. Clint Sintim saw some time at linebacker. The zone blitz, though, a remnant of the Steve Spagnuolo era Sheridan promised to get rid of, has to go. Justin Tuck cannot cover tight ends and should not be asked to. And why was there single coverage in the end zone on the final drive? C'mon, that's just asking for trouble. Which is what the Giants got.
- The Offensive Line: Argue all you want about the Giants decision to run the ball on third down from the San Diego 14 while leading 17-14. The Giants don't have to make that decision without the killer holding penalty on Chris Snee. The line as a whole did not play well, in my mind. San Diego blitzers ran free much of the game and Eli was sacked five times and ran for his life at least a half-dozen other times. The dirty little secret with the Giants offense is that this offensive line, dominant for so long, is beginning to show some cracks. How can Shawne Merriman -- Merriman, of all people -- get a free, unblocked run at Manning on the final play of the game? In the run game, there were a few holes. But, not consistently.
- Fans calling for immediate firings: You guys know that isn't going to happen. C'mon, gang! TC is a terrific coach who made a decision that ended up backfiring Sunday. Sheridan did some good things and some bad ones Sunday. As for Gilbride, I'd think people would get tired of calling for his head. The Giants have had a lot of success the past few seasons, and they have hit a rough patch. It happens. No reason to want everybody gone. Think they wouldn't love to have TC and his staff in Washington? Or Oakland? Or a lot of other places?
218 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I really think Jeff Feagles has gotten old before our very eyes.
Beyond that, I don’t really even want to talk about the game, I still have the “what the hell just happened?” look on my face.
And oh lucky me, I get to go to Dallas on business for three days tomorrow.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Nov 9, 2009 8:54 AM EST reply actions
Feagles has been like this for a while now...
its just the GIants haven’t had too many punts from their own zone since say…2006?
He’s excellent for when they are at midfield.
BUt a punter who can do it all has been long overdue. THe Giants ST has been killing them on field position the past few games, and Feagles and Tynes kickoffs/coverage too has been a big culprit.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Feagles is scaring me now
If he’s kicking from deep in our own territory, chances are good that they’re going to be at mid-field to start. He needs to get as much leg as physically he can to give our porous punt coverage a chance. Rather than directing it out of bounds!
There is some progress to speak of, but this is a bad loss becuase...
…it was a winnable game, much like the Arizona game. Good teams find a way to win these types of games. When it’s all said and done and we look back on the season, these are going to the ones we really regret, because the difference between a W and a L came down to a few plays we just didn’t make. Ultimately, that could be the difference between making the playoffs and spending time getting reacquainted with their golf games come January.
by Step up and make big plays on Nov 9, 2009 10:07 AM EST up reply actions
Defensive personnel
I definitely agree that the defensive the defensive personnel changes paid huge dividends. Putting Rouse in & switching spots with Johnson, Sintim replacing Clark on passing downs, Boley & Canty back, etc … If the Giants win, that would have been the story of the game. At least going forward we can feel a little better where the talent on defense is, especially with Ross likely coming back for the next game too.
definitely a lot of major improvement.
They lost the game…but a game like this really didn’t seem like all that bad of a loss (if it wasn’t teh 4th in a row..meaning.)
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bj
I agree with bj getting kudos..howevern KG should get wet willie for not riding BJ..11 carries for your work horse does not cut it..they went shotgun far to early IMO..CWebb had an off game but even the best of the best have suffered such games..TC is starting to kill my lil dream of a Giant turn around..1 game seasons mean go for it on 4th &1 when Eli & BJ were playing well..
i dunno maybe I just like the colors
by Mr.Williams on Nov 9, 2009 9:06 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Agreed
on TC. One-game seasons mean you go for it on 4th and 1, and you play to win at the end instead of refusing to take a shot. Largely, this one is on TC.
Why was BJ sitting for those long stretches
He was getting 6 yards every time he touched the ball. Bradshaw, granted a hard runner, does not get the consistent yardage BJ gets. Why is he in for such long stretches?
By the way, BAD!!! drop by BJ on the screen in the 4th. Running before he caught the ball. boo.
Jacobs comes up with injuries that even if he's in the game at that point...
he’s no more effective than AB.
the real problem is why not 6"0 225lbs Danny Ware?
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It was a bad drop, but...
…it was also a very quick adjustment. BJ had just chipped the rusher and had gotten off the ground, and said rusher was the one who forced Eli to dump the ball off quickly.
by Step up and make big plays on Nov 9, 2009 10:09 AM EST up reply actions
yea..
that drop wasn’t on Jacobs…it was on no one.
Eli made a Houdini move and it was too quick for Jake to react.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 9, 2009 11:08 AM EST up reply actions
disagree...
that’s a catchable ball but he didn’t know if there were any white shirts about to floor him (even though no one was closer than 5 yds. to him.) he looked up field to quickly.
Best thing to take from this
was the Eli from the first 5 games is back. The difference is the D is still licking its wounds and really needs this break.
I think Sheridan and TC made some nice improvements to the D, like switching MJ to strong side (or whatever he wasn’t on before…it worked yesterday).
I think the Jacobs 11 caries is a misnomer…he limited himself (think…Joba Chamberlain…), he was injured and in and out.
I don’t fault anyone for not using him. I do fault them for not FREEING WARE more. Dude looks like a combo of BJ, AB and D-Ward…gotta get the rock in his hands more. I don’t care he’s not a pass blocker…you don’t pass block on running plays…..
I’d like some more trust in Eli tho. Really, he was excellent and they didn’t trust him when it counted (Vs….he wasn’t all that good/healthy in the past 3..and they trusted him too much).
And yea, agree on C-Web. If he’s legit..he shuts down Jackson. He’s been getting burned a lot…maybe he’s just trying to do too much?
I expect them to win against ATL. That is all.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Maybe...
“PasstoSmithon3rd=1st”
Gotta nice ring to it right?
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What I don't like about Eli yesterday...
…was a lot of scrambling…none of it for positive yardage, mind you (which tells me he doesn’t wantto test his foot), but watching him get ou of the pocket and throw the ball incomplete to the sidelines makes me cringe because one of these times while being pursued he may pull up lame again.
Other than that, he was very efficient yesterday. I can live w/o the delay of game call, though.
by Step up and make big plays on Nov 9, 2009 10:11 AM EST up reply actions
Kiwanuka on Desean Jackson last game
Ed, not sure if you have the game on DVR, but last week against the Eagles we had Kiwanuka drop back in coverage last week on Jackson. Jackson completely jukes Kiwanuka and made him fall, but luckily Fred Robbins tipped the ball at the line and saved a TD. I thought for sure that the Giants would see that on film and stop dropping DEs into coverage against the other team’s primary targets. But, apparently we don’t make adjustments.
Zone blitz
You know I hate it. Spags used it last year, and I hated it then. Sheridan promised to get rid of it and, if anything, he used it more than Spags did. It’s awful.
My understanding of a zone blitz ...
is the DE is supposed to cover the flat on one side to make sure a RB can’t swing out for a dump-off uncovered. Somehow, they had Tuck running 15 yeards downfield man-to-man with the TE. That’s not how it’s done. That also means the blitz is not getting there.
Regarding the last TD that Webster gave up
From MG:
That set up the touchdown, which came against a Cover-2 man defense – not a Cover-4, which would have helped the Giants do what the Chargers did on the previous drive: defend the goal line.
"I was thinking Gates down the middle," Rivers said, "but they weren’t going to let that happen."
Gates ran a post pattern, which baited Johnson to stay closer to the middle of the field and left the corner of the end zone to Jackson. Webster was playing "trail position" on Jackson, meaning he was underneath the receiver and expecting help up top.
And we need a new kicking crew.
Feagles is a good directional kicker…but that’s like having a FG kicker who can’t kick off (oh wait…).
I’d love for them to find one of these guys who can punt, kick FG and kickoff…
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and do it well too....
Really, hopefully if the Raiders don’t re-sign Shane Lechler..I’d pay him whatever he wants.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Feagles was perfect....
….when the offense could move the ball and the defense could bail him out. He didn’t need a booming leg because the offense was generally further downfield. And because Tynes doesn’t have a big leg, punting while he’s standing between the 45s (rather than trying a long FG) was vital to getting a good start for the defense.
But the last few weeks, the offense hasn’t been moving the ball, so he’s been called on to kick longer. Which he can’t do. And our defense hasn’t been playing well, so his shortcomings are more apparent.
OMAHA!
OMAHA!
Other strange play calls
We can question the play calls on the Giants drive before the Thomas interception – what was it 2 and 4 or 6 and he went pass (inc) and then I believe sack. The guys on the radio were going nuts over not running Jacobs.
However, the call that puzzled me the most was on our opening drive. TC declined the offside penalty and took the play so we were 2nd and 2 on their 22 as opposed to first and 5 on their 25. In these cases you always take the penalty as the extra down is better than the three yards – we all know what happened next – but taking the penalty could well have given us the opening drive TD.
Overall the team played better – but you cannot see where the next win is coming from.
by G Fan in England on Nov 9, 2009 9:18 AM EST reply actions
I've seen this one second guessed a lot...
yet, if on 1st and 5…Jacobs gets bottled up and its 2nd and 5…that doesn;’t gain much does it?
I like the idea of leaving it 2nd and 3. There’s really no excuse for not getting 3 yards in 2 downs…..
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Run the same two plays again
and instead of 4th and 1 it is 3rd and 4.
In my view you only take the play if you got a first down the Giants did not and it cost them on that drive.
by G Fan in England on Nov 9, 2009 9:43 AM EST up reply actions
Thats where i argue with myself lol
In any event of 2nd and 2, or a 1st and 5, theres no excuse not to make it. Other than good defense!
or bad playcalling
as AB got stopped on 3rd and 1 twice!
by G Fan in England on Nov 9, 2009 9:56 AM EST up reply actions
plus you gotta also add that they were a few yards further back for the FG..
you know, the one that didn’t happen?
Either way….Steve Smith over the middle.
I think that’s why my name change should be.
PasstoSmithon3rd=1st.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Depressing stuff
And I am so numb to it all after yet another loss, I will just take what you say as accurate. I am thinking no football next week for me, I need a break from feeling down.
Drinking Depression and football
This loss took the gem out of my doghnut for sure. I went from feeling like the Giants were gonna get salvage the season to now wondering how high of a draft pick will we get. One thing is for sure Sheridan has got to go at the end of the season, I don’t care what kind of numbers the D put up, every time the opposing QB goes back for a pass I hold my breath. TC what are you thinking not going for the TD up by 6 with 3 mins to go and our D Specializes in giving up monster plays in the air. I can say this for sure our D can’t stop anybody when it matters, can anybody say Tim Lewis Defense!
by Late for Dinner on Nov 9, 2009 9:29 AM EST up reply actions
Kevin Gilbride
Manning will never be the high percentage passer everyone wants him to be until Gilbride calls more high-percentage passes. Yesterday, he did. For the first 5 games, he did. For the previous 3 weeks, his playcalling looked like a relic from the early ‘70s. Bradshaw takes a screen 58 yards? Let’s not run another one for a month. Most teams must throw 3-5 RB screens per game; the Giants run that many in a season. Lots of deep, low-percentage throws the past 3 weeks.
Yesterday’s playcalling is exactly what they need when the winds start swirling in Giants Stadium – screens, quick slants, and shallow crossing routes. The less time and distance the ball is in the air, the less the wind will affect it. It’s also what you need when your QB has struggled making the deeper throws for a few weeks. I think he deserves the Kudos this week.
I always thought Eli is money on the short play action plays...
I do believe the last Play action in the red zone was in the KC game where he found Smith in the back of the end zone.
Really, its a staple of so many teams to call play action down there..and the Giants just refuse to do it.
Every week, I see teams have no problem at all scoring inside the 5, and its cuz of the play action down there.
You’re right, I really don’t understand why the do something that works so well one week…yet it takes them so long to use it again (i.e. slants this week worked to perfection….)
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gillbride
He surprisesd me with a pretty solid game plan and even threw in a few wrinkles. My only question is WHAT TOOK SO LONG KEVIN!
by Late for Dinner on Nov 9, 2009 9:32 AM EST up reply actions
Well, these losses are harder to take than a beat down
Even though we had improvements, except on ST’s, it’s how everything that unfolded that makes it harder to come to grips with. Though it’s still a loss, heading into the bye week with noticeable improvements has to account for something!
Hey Ed
Feagles botched the hold which is why Tynes didn’t kick it. His hands were blanketing the ball when Tynes came through which is why he held up…he didn’t want to kick through his hands.
I disagree, replay it..
Feagles handled the snap perfectly..I watched it over and over again..and even Simms was scratching his head over that bone-head pulling up. He just blew it…He also charged at the ball too quick..His timing was the cause of that flubbed kick…Not the snapper and not Feagles.
That could be...
I didn’t look at Tynes’s timing, I just noticed that when he was at the ball, Feagles hands were still cradling it
Either way
I have not liked Tynes even before the Green Bay ‘miss and make’
We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.
Feagles admitted to blowing it....
he didn’t get the snap down from my vantage…the ball way laying on the field…not standing on point.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
I'm pretty sure Feagles admitted to blowing it...
he didn’t get the snap down from my vantage…the ball way laying on the field…not standing on point.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Tynes is pointing the finger
Feagles was not interviewed after the game, but Tynes put the blame on Feagles afterward. Typical Tynes though.
got it...
someone over at ESPN told me Feagles admitted to it…
guess not.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
I agree with bobbiblue
Tynes has to trust the holder. Even is it’s a high snap or a bobbled snap, he needs to go up and kick the ball. The replays showed that there was a little fumbling, but that Feagles had it down in time for Tynes to at least attempt the kick.
Where does this loss Rank?
I’m still sick over it. I’m 32 years old I started watching the G-Men as a kid in the 80’s with LT and Simms. I know there are a lot of you on here that have been fans longer than me so you’ve seen more but this is one of the most disheartning regular seasons losses since I’ve been a Giants fan here are the rest. Where do you guys think this one compares?
1988 loss to crappy Jets team to miss out on division title and get knocked out of the playoffs. They scored late only to let Ken O’Brien march down the field to win the game.
1989 loss to Eagles at home, Randall Cunninghams 99 yard punt
1993 loss to Dallas to loose out on division and homefield advantage. Reeves plays for OT late when Giants have chance to win
The Fassel era is loaded with these types of games
2001 Loss to Rams when Strahan goes nuts and kills Warner all day only to allow them to score late while Giants kick FG’s all day
2001 following week loss to the Eagles on Monday night. Same thing as Rams game
2002 Loss to TItans at home, Giants blow two score lead with 10 minuetes left in 4th quarter becasue Fassel starts going for two point conversions to early
2003 Loss to Dallas on Monday night second week of the year. Giants complete awsome comeback only to kick the ball out of bounse. Dallas completes a 25 yard pass to the sideline then kicks game winning FG with no time left
2003 Loss to Eagles at home. Giants beat up McNabb all day allow 90 yard punt return to Westbrook to loose with less than 2 mins left.
2005 losse to Seatle, Jay Feely & Lucke Pettigoute nough said
I can still see TT picking that ball off and me jumping for joy thinking it was over, I can’t believe they lost I think I’m still in shock. They were back to GIants football it seemed yesterday, for somereason I’m not fully upset yet becasue I think they won I can’t believe it.
I feel for you kid
Just remember to put some of the big wins on your list. Even just the recent ones:
Week 1: Ruining the $100 Million Man’s debut.
Week 2: Ruining Jerry Jones homecoming
Weeks 3-5: Stomping where the stomping is due.
All the loses suck. Well…except for that week 17 against the 15-0 Pats. That was a loss that didn’t suck. OK Most of the loses suck. This loss sucks. Not as much as the Pisarcik loss, but is still sucks.
for me the worst was the loss to the Eagles on the Westbrook punt return
b/c I was in college watching it with my roommate who is a big-time Eagles fan. The rest (that I remember) I suffered in silence, which was much better.
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
No the worst was "The Fumble"
Joe P..Fumbles when he could have knelt down and run out the clock.. Edwards picks it up and scores the winning touchdown..I had nicotine stains in my underwear watching that play.
My dad always tells me how awful that was
I was born a few months before that play and he was had to paint my room that day. He was going to go with blue but he decided not after that play he always tells me.
I'm having agida...
…was it the ‘98 playoffs against the Vikes where they recovered an onside kick and drove for the game winning touchdown. Bad memories. The price for being a true fan. I’m starting to second guess the psl.
by Last year in Sec 127 on Nov 9, 2009 10:40 AM EST up reply actions
How about
the game against the Cowboys where we were ahead only for Simms to fumble the snap from centre at our 20, we concede a TD and then Walls picks off a pass just across midfield to end the game.
by G Fan in England on Nov 9, 2009 11:02 AM EST up reply actions
Playoff loses
You omitted 2 horrendous playoff loses.
First the 1997 playoff loss to the Vikings at home up 9 with less than 2 minutes remaining.
Then the 2002 disaster at SF. The Giants were leading 38-14 late in the 3rd quarter. Shockey dropped an easy TD pass. Bryant missed a 42-yard FG with 3 minutes remaining. Then of course the botched snap and no PIT call on the games final play.
Worst. Game. Ever.
SF is obviously the worst. I invite any Giants fan to try to watch the entire 2nd half of that one without weeping.
I've seen so many bad days and bad games..over 48 years..
I could write a book..but I have never seen our defense play so poorly..Alot of folks out here think they “improved”..I don’t..and that zone blitz has to go out the window.
Respectful of anothers opinion
But we did hold them to 14 points for 3.95 quarters and they moreless had no ground game. This looked a lot better than the previous weeks of teams having their way with this D! Just saying. :)
They seemed a lot
better than they were in the last three games, They just fell apart on that last drive.
Don't blast TC call to rely on defense
The D just came off a great two series, knocked them back and then the pick, they had their ears pinned back, and if I was TC, I would have said no way the Chargers could suddenly pick it back up to get a TD.
On that last drive, it seemed as if suddenly Rivers was able to see what the G-men D were going to do and take what they were going to be given, or attack at the point. This was that Super Bowl winning drive in reverse, we left too much time on the clock.
My concern is how easily SD was able to cruise down and score. That goes to our D with the game on the line. They HAVE to be able to stop a team from scoring at the end of the half or game, and they have consistently NOT been able to do that
true...
but to put so much pressure on a defense that WAS playing out of its a-hole…yet obviously struggled for 3 straight weeks…kinda tough.
Gotta remember also…Tuck getting injured KILLED them on that final drive. The TO, the fact he wasn’t out there…all of it. Killed them.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I won't blast him
but this D has let up big drives in big spots all year and even dating back to late last year. Yea they played great on the previous two series but to ask them to do a third time is a lot. Come on you cant tell me you felt good when the D was on the field there, I know they should hold them but this is a mediorce D that played well because the O dominated TOP and kept them off the field. There are very few D’s in this league I would trust against a good QB and O with that much time.
yeah
it’s like the light bulb went on for the Chargers: Oh yeah, the Giants can’t stop the pass!
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Nov 9, 2009 10:03 AM EST up reply actions
It took a lot of...
…restraint not to flip my coffee table last night. Good to see the guys in blue with some passion and having fun on the field for a change. The only zone or coverage the DEs should be playing is the screen. I hear C Cowherd talk about the players not caring about winning or losing as much as true fans. I think they should be caring the most! This is their livelyhood. I would play like my life depended on it. I get paid because I do my job well. We got two weeks to right this ship. We are at a crossroads. This loss better keep the boys in blue angry, hungry, and focussed. Never had falcon but I hear that is whats on the menu. The crowd sounded good. Keep bringin’ the noise!..
by Last year in Sec 127 on Nov 9, 2009 11:08 AM EST up reply actions
BS
On first and goal at the 4 take a damn crack at the end zone. Put the game out of reach. Go for the jugular. Our failures in goal to go situation is due to the lack of passing plays and most notably the disappearance of the play action pass.
and that would have mattered how?
the 1st and goal play was nullified and brought back by the holding call.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 9, 2009 11:54 AM EST up reply actions
"You play to win the game"
I don’t understand people that agree with the running play on 3rd and goal from the 9. Time wasn’t an issue at all at that point. The Chargers were either going to get the ball with 3:00 or 2:15 and 1 timeout. In any other instance throughout the game you would want to throw the ball in this situation, so why on earth would you change that stance when you could ice the game? What’s the downside of Eli throwing an incompletion? NOTHING. What’s the upside? GAME OVER. There is no downside and the upside is to end the game.
Disagree completely.
Since starting 5-0, the Giants have shown a huge problem shutting down the passing game. When the Giants kicked the field goal, my assumption was the chargers would win.
From the NY Daily News
The Giants are just the second team in NFL history to follow a 5-0 start with four straight losses. The other team was the 1989 Rams.
Those Rams, by the way, won six of their last seven games, finished 11-5, made the playoffs as a wild-card, and their season didn’t end until they lost at San Francisco in the NFC championship game.
Let´s hope that´s happen with the Giants too…
Yeah, we like NFL here in Brazil.
Fair to say
that when you are on a losing streak you end up playing the percentage game trying to win games.
The Giants played safe at the end of the game and it cost them.
If this had been week 6 we would have closed out the game.
by G Fan in England on Nov 9, 2009 10:02 AM EST reply actions
Dead in the Water
One question..If Coughlin challenged his team perform then why didn’t he give them the opportunity? Timid play not to lose approach cost them & it was all Coughlin.
Don’t be too hard on Chris Snee, there was mysteriously no replay of his holding call which in NFL-Network parlirance means there wasn’t any holding,
Conversely, S.D. passes over 40 times in the face of a blitzing Giants D & not a single solitary holding call, NOT ONE!!!!
Nothing Is Fool proof if you have the right fools.
that reminded me...
…I remember Big Fred Robbins getting tackled on a big pass play and waiting for the flag…..no flag.
by Last year in Sec 127 on Nov 9, 2009 11:16 AM EST up reply actions
Speaking of Freddie ...
He probably deserves a kudo. I thought he played well yesterday. His 1st good game really.
Robbins
was included in my d-line ‘kudos.’
by Ed Valentine on Nov 9, 2009 11:37 AM EST up reply actions
OMG
I know as a fan we often think see holding on TV that’s not called. Yesterday, I saw a few that have to be called. In one the o-lineman had his arm wrapped around the d-lineman. In another our d-lineman was pulled down by his arm.
actually before the TD to VJ…gates gets a first with MJ on him..and Gregg sproiels(sp) get a huge gain…COVERAGE calls late in the game killed us..So I put this on the COACHES….80% and 20% on the players…I honestly see the giants winning 7 straight…or going 6-1 the rest of the way..Perhaps its bind faith..but I know this team is waaay better than they have shown.,,,now that everyone is calling them crap,perhaps the proverbial chip will be placed back on their shoulders…
side note..can we just line up and play without all the damn time wasting adjustments ? just once…I think other teams bait us into cahnging plays at the line…only for the gaints to run a play the other D is waiting for…
i dunno maybe I just like the colors
Gonna sound like "that fan" but...
Two calls really burned me. First was that Eli Manning “sack” even though it was quite clear Eli had about half a foot of yardage left before the ball left his hand. I’m shocked we couldn’t challenge that. Or maybe I’m… “socked”. Nyuk nyuk.
But in all seriousness the call that kills me is no flag for the helmet to helmet shot to Boss. I’m honestly really starting to get worried for this guy because this is about the third game this season where he’s taken a helmet to helmet shot and it hasn’t been called. I’m really concerned that defenses will continue to do this. Boss is a beast and perhaps the best player on the Giants (and I’m serious about that. Name one player besides maybe Steve Smith that’s been as consistant) but something tragic is going to happen to this kid if teams don’t start to ease back with their helmet to helmet shots. Kudos to Boss are well deserved, and if he doesn’t go to Hawaii this year, then there is no justice in this world. Gonzales & Witten wouldn’t have taken a shot like that only to get up a score a touchdown later.
You just named the three
Best tight-ends in football..Boss is one of them..that helmet hit should have drawn a flag, but it didn’t..I’d submit that him and Witten are the top two TEs in the league..As I stated in an earlier post, seeing him stagger off the field after his bell was rung sitting on the bench pouring ice water over his head and face was special..that kid refuses to give up..He shows that toughness every week.
If Gonzalez or Witten
took a helmet to helmet it would have been called. So many calls in the NFL are arbitrary based on who the person is committing the penalty. I have seen defensive players diving at QBs legs all year, but guess who the only QB that gets that call is…that’s right Tom Brady. More calls are based on reputation than actual foul…how many of us remember Doug Reisenberg getting called for holding 5 times a game…granted 3 of those would be justified, but the other two would be great blocking by anyone other than him because he had the reputation as someone who holds.
Perhaps they would have tossed the flag..
To protect Gonzalez..but Witten and Boss are not big mouths..You hardly ever hear anything from them..They just get ready and play the game each week..and I absolutely agree that these referees are protecting Brady..I saw Eli get whacked low yesterday and no flag was thrown..and I remember Reisenburg’s five holds..I really think only one was a true holding penalty..That one call was due to his protecting his QB…and yes some players draw attention to themselves from their actions over time..then they get special focus from the refs..
There was one play
where it looked like we crumpled rivers at the legs.
I don’t like the whole roughing the passer crap with the Brady Rule. But I think we did get out of that one.
Of course, on that same play someone else committed a flag.
The Cowboys are the France of the NFL
-thwalls
I don't recall seeing that hit low on Rivers Will..
But if we do that I don’t condone it..The issue I have is that if is not intentional, and just football players playing the game..well then that’s the way it is..If it is intentional then they should get flagged and fined..I don’t care if it is our guys either..It’s just not right.
I agree the rule goes too far
It should only be if its intentional, not because a guy can’t stop himself
The Cowboys are the France of the NFL
-thwalls
On 3rd down, throw it to Smith.
Glad you mentioned that hit, R
I did notice one of the commentators say he took it on the jaw, but I thought the replay showed helmet to helmet. If it was the jaw, thqt’s close enough for a penalty as far as I’m concerned. One of the commentators also said that he invites that kind of shot because he runs straight up. Well, so does BJ, but I never saw him get hit like that. Boss might be an easier target because the hit happens just as he catches the ball. He might be easier to bring down up high than BJ also, but I don’t believe that. Those kind of hits to the head, a guy goiing full speed into you, would bring anyone down. Anyway, I share your feelings re Boss and love seeing so many BBVers jumping on his bandwagon.
Challenge the refs?
Oh no way, they always make the right calls. Don’t they?
We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.
I'd like to punch
Mike Pereira, NFL VP of Officiating the next time he say “we get 98% of the calls correct”. Yeah but at times the other 2% are so glaring.
Can someone explain why Eli stepping out of bounds is not reviewable. If a running back or receiver are running down the side line they often review if they stepped out. I’m at a loss why that plays not a reviewable play.
I can appreciate what you are saying here
but please review this play before you comment on Witten not being able to take a hit and get back up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z817uW6Mgjc
On top of this, Witten broke his jaw and played three games with it wired shut his rookie year. That is one tough SOB.
Boss is a really good one though, I think the NFC East has by far, and it really isn’t even close, the best TE in the NFL. Witten, Boss, Cooley, Celek…damn that’s tough
Witten is definitley..
One tough SOB..I’d take him and Boss anyday..I told my wife that Witten is the best in the league..She’s a Cowboy fan..and I hate to admit it but he is something very special..No matter who you root for, when you watch guys like Witten and Boss it is just amazing how tough they are..They never give in or give up…They can get pounded and limp off and they must will themselves back on the field…It is incredible watching players like that.
well....
i’m hanging my head today…my favorite player really let me down.
webster was just not used to matching up man 2 man the last 3 weeks and it showed.
i can’t fault sheridan…he brought more pressure and relied on his shut down corner to shut down SD best WR and he let him down.
5 catches for 57 yards ain’t bad, but that last TD…well he was just lost.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
with that being said...
this is the best i’ve felt about this team in a month…
we gotta get back to playing man…and have our players actually used to that.
we should been doing this since NO…but by waiting another 3 weeks well, it shows that guys are rusty.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
No, you should fault Sheridan on that
They should have had more guys dropped back in coverage to defend the end zone. No excuse for leaving portions of the end zone uncovered when SD had to have a TD to win.
well, i don't and here's why...
to that point Cweb had giving up what 4 catches to Jackson for what? 20-30 yards?
he had done an admiral job all day…but never got any jam at the line. We knew Rouse was basically going to do nothing. We needed our CB to match up 1 on 1 for us. And they did a pretty good job of it until Webster totally blew the coverage at the end.
i’ll admit tuck having to cover Gates was a mistake…and the pressure wasn’t all that effective…but i firmly believe that will change. sheridan has to recognize who his blitzers are and who can get at the ball carrier.
I will not fault Sheridan for doing exactly what I wanted him to do….
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
To each his own
I still disagree … 30 seconds left you have the end zone completely covered because the underneath stuff doesn’t kill you. A TD does. Keep everything in front of you.
Sheridan is still learning & I’m chalking it up to him knowing for next time, but I still think it was a fatal mistake.
well, let me say...
you are right…they should have had safety help there and you can’t give up a TD w/ that much time left…
the truth is, i’m glad we stayed in man, and didn’t go back to zone b/c i believe that would have also been a disaster.
Rouse shoulda helped out…but i’m glad we did go to man and put it all on Rouse…Webster gotta take some heat on that one…truth is we shoulda had 2 guys there instead of 1…but i think playing Zone w/ our confused safeties would have resulted in no one being there.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Webster
My only problem w/ the defense on the game-losing play is this. Webster, who had a bad day, had shown all game long he could not contain Jackson. So, with the game on the line you trust him in single coverage against the guy? That’s a bad idea.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 9, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions
we asked him to do it against Moss and Owens before...
I do think Corey is a top CB in this league…but when teams haven’t throw in your direction for the past 1 1/2 years and your used to playing zone…well they’re are going to be consequences for that…and that’s guys not being used to being physical, jamming WRs at the line, knowing opposing WRs routes, etc.
I loved our game plan but that doesn’t mean we executed it perfectly. Corey gotta get back to the basics…and that’s getting your hands on the WR at the line.
our blitzers gotta get at the QB (as opposed to falling over one another…thank you Danny Clark). And that will come w/ practice and experience.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Watching Webster..
I really think he is trying to do too much out there in an attempt to cover our own guys ineptness..that has shown the past couple of weeks..He did get burned on that catch though.
its a trust issue...
its also a safetys suck issue.
Its also a wrong play call.
Cover 2 just outside the RZ? If C-Web is in man coverage…at least Rivers has to make a better pass or it gets contested.
The safety needed to be there on that final TD. I’m not sure I fault Webster on that one.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 9, 2009 12:06 PM EST up reply actions
rouse shoulda been there to help....
but a zone D wouldn’t have guaranteed that…and the past 3 games is proof of that.
webster had his hands full and really did a pretty job w/ exeption to one play…
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Yeah good point
He doesn’t have alot of help out there at all..and yes it is a trust issue or lack of trust issue..When you watch him he is trying to read everything the past few weeks and winds up getting burned.
this is my point...
he hasn’t been asked to play man coverage in a month…
instead of having our play makers make play, sheridan was basically asking them to prevent big plays…which turned into a disaster.
now that they’re back to playing man they’re a little rusty.
but i think yesterday was a step in the right direction….
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Agree and Disagree
The offensive line has been terrible. Poor run blocking. Too many sacks. Too many penalties. The line has escaped much deserved criticism.
Once again I disagree vehemently on the kudos for Gilbride. I have no complaints outside the red zone. Inside the red zone is a complete disaster. It’s been terrible for 2+ seasons. The offense leaves too many points off the board settling for FGs. The red zone and goal to go stats speak for themselves. We’re 6th in the league in total yards. 7th in rushing yards. 12th in passing yards.
Giants are 2nd in red zone appearances with 36 red zone possessions into the red zone. We’re 28th in red zone conversions. We’re 40%. League average is 53% The teams lower than the Giants are Raiders, Browns, Bills and Rams. Enough said!
Giants are 17th in goal to go situations with 12 appearances. We’ve converted 7. We’re 26th in GTG conversions. Why? because our game calling changes inside the red zone. We get ultra conservative. I’ve said numerous times. I don’t recall one time this season when we passed the ball on first down upon entering the red zone. Eli is know as a very good play action QB. Play action has all but disappeared from the Giants game plan. Why?
Our continued ineptitude in the red zone is on KG for his play calling and on TC for his approval of the red zone offensive game plan.
Red zone
Sometimes it is also on the players. Bad penalties, etc., etc. I think it is a combination of things.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 9, 2009 11:40 AM EST up reply actions
It's been ongoing
Last season 7th in total yards and first in rushing.
we’re 2nd in red zone appearances and 21st in converting.
3rd in Goal to Go. 14th in GTG TDs
2007 tied for 6th red zone appearances. 13th in converting.
There’s something seriously wrong with our game plan and play calling in the red zone. We’ve gotten worse the last 2 seasons. It’s something TC often discusses. Obviously, the problems haven’t been addressed. We’ve progressed.
its the Giants...
since when have they ever been any good in the Red Zone?
They can come up with all sorts of ideas..yet, since they have the NY on their helmet…the FG is inevitable….(I’ve long ago renamed the term “Field Goal” with “New York Giant”).
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 9, 2009 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
You are so right
Since 2002 the Giants are 3rd in red zone appearances. They are 29th in red zone TDs.
I figured it was bad. I didn’t realize it would be this terrible.
Oh that's 2002....
Go back even further. I mean I’ve probably only been following the GIants since around 96, but as far as my pops says…the Giants would not have a single loss in their history if they could score a TD inside the RZ with any sort of consistency.
They move the ball so well yet…soon as the get inside the 25 or 30 (let alone the 20..) they just take out the paper, put their feet up and take a nice big dump right at that spot. they don’t go back ,they don’t go forward..just a big steaming pile right at the 20 yard line.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 9, 2009 12:22 PM EST up reply actions
I've been following the Gints since 1984
and even in those Parcells years they settled for FG’s. Hell they won an NFC Championship Game in 1990 vs SF with just 5 FG’s and no TD’s!! Think about that. They actually called a halfback option in one of their Red-Zone trips and Maurce Carthon who was the Madison Hedgcock of that era dropped a perfect pass from Dave Megget. It’s always been the story with them. In Super Bowl 25 they were down 19-17 and had a 1st and goal at the Buffalo 3 and had to settle for a FG just so we could sweat out Scott Norword’s miss. Guess what the play calling was, run to OJ looses 4 run to Megget gets 4 yards back., Hosteltler throws it away.
yup.
see, it just doesn’t matter.
We all want this TEAM to be better where they screw up…yet, there is just something there..I don’t know if its the air, the owners..I have no clue.
the GIants will never be a run and shoot team. They’ll never win if their defense isn’t top 10. They’ll never be very good in the red zone.
I know there’s a thousand more Giants stereotypes…that a true. Most of them I hate…but there’s just nothing you can do about it….LOL!!!
They will ALWAYS BE THE GIANTS!!!
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Under TC
3rd in appearances 22nd in conversions for TDs
your right on the O-Line...
as an entire unit they’ve taken a lot of steps back.
Where last year a lot of Eli’s incompletions were on himself, this year they’re a lot on his Houdini acts escaping the blitz.
Seubert was supposed to be one of the better LG’s in teh game, I doubt that. McKenzie’s slow. Diehl is fine at LT, but he’s gotta worry about Seubert too.
Not sure I wanna say dismantle the goup, I know Seubert and McKenzie (probably a reason for their sub-par play) are hurt.
The bye week is at a perfect time.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 9, 2009 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
McKenzie has been inconsistent...
…his blocking has sprung some of our better runs in recent weeks, including BJ’s largest gain yesterday. His pass blocking has been a little shaky, I believe.
by Step up and make big plays on Nov 9, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
no doubt..
Kareem’s strong suit has always been the run. Yet, its just as an entire unit that the pass protection is not great, at least right now (the didn’t let up squat to Dallas remember).
Its injuries, the nagging sort, that are playing a big part.
I really think we’re gonna see a different team in a couple weeks.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 9, 2009 12:08 PM EST up reply actions
Teams have learned that if they load the box
and blitz…we can’t make them pay for it consistently..so it is worth the gamble for them..I still feel we have a great O-line, but you can’t expect them to block eight guys coming in on almost every play.
That is why I re-named to..
“The No-Zone Offense”..horrible..
I'm getting worried about the O line
Are we seeing early signs of deterioration?
if they play like crap next week...yea.
lots of them are banged up, probably more so than leading on (like basically the whole team..).
I think that’s their only problem.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I wouldn't consider it deterioration
As much as perhaps usage. I’m under the impression JR assembled this unit to run block more, than opposed to pass blocking. Everything seems to have tied itself together with all things considered.
- An abnormal amount of penalties leading to more passing plays
- The Giants straying from the running game with more passing
- Playing from behind of late, more passing
- D’s stacking the line, and Eli goes into passing check-off mode
- The flow of the game with the run/pass ratio seems to have no purpose
I guess it could come down to the point of trying to transform a unit into something they’re not!
How about.........
Eli checking off from pass play to a running play for no gain. WTF if you’re gonna check off into a running play I’d expect a decent gain.
I think there was a reason JR
drafted Beaty, not for depth but to replace Kareem, don’t be shocked if they draft or bring in a few more guys via FA to compete.
no doubt...
Actually, I think Beatty is the future LT. The LT is probably the most important OL position (Center is underrated for some reason…but the best OL’s have the best centers…), they will probably add some youth.
Maybe Diehl goes back to LG?
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If Beatty proves he can handle
LT, chalk up another cheap get for JR
Plus, I believe that
LT is the second most important O position after QB and that SS is turning into the most important D position. In some cases SS is WOD the most important one. (Think Polamalu) If you look at the pay scales and the draft pick priorities, it has been that way forever for LTs and it’s heading that way for the new breed of SS. Interestingly enough, Paul Brown thought center might have been more important than QB and the first position Parceels filled as Jet coach was center.
Red Zone Defense
How bad is the Giants defense keeping opposing teams out of the end zone? This Giants team is the worst defensive red zone team over the last 7 seasons.
its gotta be cuz they practice against the offense...which doesn't do anything in the red zone
how can you be ready for the play action when all the offense does is run up the middle (or pitch to the outside //**bangs head on desk)
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 9, 2009 12:15 PM EST up reply actions
Pretty Bad
The Giants Defense took a huge step backwards this year, Yesterday they did much better than the last three weeks…. But that is not saying a whole lot. Bottom line. if this was Spags D of 08 they stop Rivers Giants win the game.
by Late for Dinner on Nov 9, 2009 1:04 PM EST up reply actions
The O is always up and down...
I’m used to that. what I’m not used to is incompetent D week in and week out. Yes, they played better, but you just knew they weren’t going to get the stop when they really needed it. They blew their load on a few great series, reminding us all what this D was SUPPOSED to be, then came into the last series, the one that mattered, like a male porn star who’s been effed out, over cooked pasta limp, and able to shoot nothing but dust, if even that.
The coaches shoulder alot of this, sure. But the players, man, the players are playing tired for 20 minutes of a 60 minute game. Doesn’t cut it.
D just not that good
I think we all need to face some fact here, our Defense has reverted back to the Timy Lewis era. They can’t stop anybody when it matters and it’s only going to get worse from here.
by Late for Dinner on Nov 9, 2009 1:06 PM EST up reply actions
The Tim Lewis era ...
was about trying to “read and react”, rather than be aggressive, and make the O react to you. Our current problems might be TL-esque in the scheme, but if we can get back to the scheme we had last two years (that Sheridan said he was going to continue), we have enough players to stop people.
So anything the offense does well is credited to KG but anything they do poorly is pinned on TC? I’ll admit KG does a lot of good things outside of the 20, but how can you be satisfied with an OC who regularly settles for FG when his offense reaches the redzone? Three years of redzone (and short-yardage third down) futility and the guy has yet to make an meaningful adjustments. You are wrong to continually defend him.
KG coaching position should be upgraded in the off season
However, this loss is a team loss, you could blame Feagles for the field goal snafu, or the Giants D for once again proving they are not ready for prime time, or TC KG or BS. Bottom line, to many mistakes were made and that was the diffrence kind of like a death by 1000 razor blades
by Late for Dinner on Nov 9, 2009 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
its been said over and over...
KG calls the plays, that’s it.
If Coughlin wants to shoot the EZ…Gilbride comes up with it. If Coughlin wants to be “conservative” (the run almost got a TD…) then that’s what Gilbride calls.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 9, 2009 12:50 PM EST up reply actions
You’ll have to give me the frequency of those headsets, because if you know how much control TC exerts over the play calling you must be listening in on their conversations. You have no idea how much KG had to do with various play-calling decisions and neither do I. All I am saying is that there is a body of evidence showing our offense’s struggle in certain key situations, and the OC has a lot to do with that.
I wasn’t implying KG is solely responsible for this loss, nor any other loss. I am simply refuting his continued support from some members of this blog.
Exactly.
The O moves the ball pretty well between the 20s, but when we’re in the “Green Zone”, we tend to constrict ourselves either by poor play calls or poor play or any combination of a myriad of things.
Either way, it’s sad not to be able to score a TD from inside the 5, for whatever reason.
We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.
Well I'll tell you folks..
It sure will be nice when we get back to being able to have nothing but positives to comment about on BBV again..This is becoming depressing this year..We are all forced to complain about everything we’re seeing..except one or two players each week who did their job..I really thought the “one or two players that did good” days were over..Especially with the talent we have on this team..Otherwise we should just tell sick jokes and have Ed yell at us..At least we will have put a spark in him!!…lol
How about a Willie
for knee injuries? If Boley and Phillips don’t get hurt, none of this ever happens….
With Eli looking SO MUCH better yesterday, have to wonder if that bum heel was a contributor to the old “high-throw” Eli we saw the last few weeks prior.
Someone said it up top, but huge kudos for the bye week! Hopefully they’ll spend the next two weeks getting pissed off about going from 5-0 to 5-4 and lay waste to the NFL for the last 10 games of the year.
I'd love for the blame to be placed on Phillip Rivers...
would be nice actually (not sure if he gets Kudo or Wet Willie…or maybe just a handshake and a kick in the nuts?).
Did the D fall apart? Maybe…but the way this guy hung in there, I really gotta give Rivers more credit than say the D failed.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Faith!
I’m actually kind of happy looking forward this season. Aside from the Tuck on Gates thing and CW messing up a few big plays, our D is looking a lot more like it used to be. Call me optomistic, but I’m seeing good things coming next week!
by Gelatin on Nov 9, 2009 1:07 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Please pass on some of this optomistic thought to me
Cause all I see is this team not making the playoffs because this D can’t stop anyboby.
by Late for Dinner on Nov 9, 2009 1:08 PM EST up reply actions
considering the Giants don't play ;)
I agree with ya.
….I know what your saying, the team looked a lot different and going forward as guys get healthy and gets some more practice reps…Boley, Canty, Rouse…even most of the O-Line, Boss can use it, Jacobs, Eli…damn near everyone needs this.
Giants will be fine. SB champs even. Just win next week.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lost Year
Looking at the remaining schedule, I doubt we’re seeing this Giants team in the post season.
After the 5-0 start, this is really depressing.
Yesterday’s game just kills me. Tynes skipping kicking a FG. Calling a run on 3rd and goal from the 14. A complete inability to pick up 3rd and 1. Feagles punting. Just a disaster.
SOME TEAMS GET HOT IN NOVEMEBER
AND SOME TEAMS GET HOT IN DECEMBER.
WE WILL MAKE THE TOURNAMENT, AND WE WILL BE A FORCE TO BE RECKONED WITH.
That is all.
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Nov 9, 2009 1:13 PM EST reply actions
And some teams choke, choke, choke in december
I’m looking at you Romo
The Cowboys are the France of the NFL
-thwalls
On 3rd down, throw it to Smith.
You know what Eli's December record is
in the last two years? Probably not, but I will tell you. 3-5
Guess what Romo’s is? That’s right….3-5
Well...
That includes a game vs the vikings where eli played one series and the vikes barely beat our 2nd team. And the year before we faced the Pats, which i didn’t mind losing to because we ended up winning the superbowl that year.
So your argument is moot
The Cowboys are the France of the NFL
-thwalls
On 3rd down, throw it to Smith.
and Romo's includes
the 13-3 season where we didn’t need to win hardly anything to clinch the division, so I get what you’re saying, that circumstances change things but that doesn’t just include your team
Point taken
I think romo’s a good qb, just that when the game’s on the line, I want eli under center
The Cowboys are the France of the NFL
-thwalls
On 3rd down, throw it to Smith.
Eli had his
good run to the Superbowl (and congratulations to him for that, he played well), but I’ll take the guy who has played better over the course of his entire career and the numbers do reflect that player is Romo
And that's fair
Its your opinion, but nothing’s going to change mine.
The Cowboys are the France of the NFL
-thwalls
On 3rd down, throw it to Smith.
Week 2.
Nuff said.
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Nov 16, 2009 1:36 PM EST up reply actions
Well if he throws 3 interceptions to Dallas on the stadium's opening day
Then yes, I will reconsider. Until then, “that’s my quarterback”
The Cowboys are the France of the NFL
-thwalls
On 3rd down, throw it to Smith.
WR
they did a good job yesterday…i just wish they can stop having hixon over nicks on some plays….Nicks needs the ball more as does manningham as they can make plays and get that YAC which Steve Smithers cant.
If I were a Ginats fan...
I would be pissed about the decision of Eli over Rivers. Considering it wasn’t a 1 for 1 trade but you guys have to give up a bit more, I dont see how it can be justified. It is true that Eli has a ring and Rivers doesnt but I think that ring was won because of the defense.
Eli is an OK QB but I think Rivers is doing a better job. Eli is deffinetly no peyton, that’s for sure.
In this business
it’s all about the Super Bowls. That’s the object. Eli is not Peyton, you are correct. But he has a Super Bowl ring, and Eli has a Super Bowl ring. Where is Rivers’?
We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.
Dont you think you wouldve won that ring with Rivers too?
Dont you give that ring to the D and not the QB?
That's too speculative
Our D did what they had to against Brady. Besides the pressure and hurries, the sacks are what mattered against him, i think 5 (sacks) in total.
But to assume Rivers or even Roethlisberger in the same situation that Eli was in, with the pocket collapsing and the head catch, you can only wonder?! That must be an intangible that cannot be measured, but sought! I’m not saying the other guy’s couldn’t have done it, but with Eli, that’s the way it unfolded, and you can’t take that away!
Dont think about the SB.....
Think about all the games that got you there……That deffense with Strahan, Umenyora, etc was scary…….it was very similar to the Ravens that got them the superbowl.
Eli had a fantastic 4th qtr in the SB.
Dont the worng idea, I am a cowboys fan but inall honesty I would much rather see NY win a superbowl than Philly or New England.
Name 1 quarterback better than Eli
Throughout the entire ’07 Playoffs.
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Nov 16, 2009 1:35 PM EST up reply actions
No I don't think they win with Rivers....
…what are you gonna say to counter that? You can’t say anything cuz that’s a real stupid way to think.
The Giants defense was excellent…yea. But I can tell you right now not a single SB winner has EVER WON IN SPITE OF THEIR DEFENSE!
Also…how do you think teh Giants scored any points in their SB run? Cuz the running game sure as hell wasn’t racking up 150yards a game in the playoffs…it was Eli marching them right down the field.
You really are trying to give crap. So you should really just NOT come in here with this bullcrap.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GAgiant
You have to keep this realistic. I know what your saying, but Phil has major road blocks to overcome. We know as knowledgeable fans, you need a solid surpporting cast, with saying that, Phil has to contend with Brady, Manning and Roethlisberger.
The same could be said about Marino. His career paralleled that of Easison, Elway and Kelley. Marino only has Pro Bowls and records to show for his accomplishments!
If I were a Cowboys fan...
I would be pissed that the last dozen QBs to start for my team have won a total of 0 playoff games.
Im not trying to give you guys crap
It is a good subject because of the match up yesterday. I do think that the Giants had a great D and now invested heavily on a QB that couldve come cheaper and you couldve kept some draft picks.
As a cowboys fan im not exactly thrilled about the trade for Roy Williams. Roy Williams doesnt look better than Crayton, nor Austin and Ogletree and Hurd should be coming along fine.
Regarding our QB’s….yes, they all sucked from the time Aikman retired to Romo (still has to win a playoff game, agreed….but he’s a good QB I think). Not only our QB’s were bad but the o-line was terrible. Those situations were the result of trades or contarcts like the Ginats did with Eli (and us with Williams).
At this point, it's water under the bridge
Besides, Eli didn’t want to play out there for one reason or another, but that’s his perogative. Knowing this, the Chargers forced the issue and still drafted him only for the return value of any team entertaining trades. It could’ve been avoided!
But for giving up more, within proximity of value? Regardless of where a player is chosen, it’s still a 50/50 gamble of success. Also, perhaps the Giants had Eli rated higher than some, then Phil and then Ben? My point, the Giants could’ve traded down to get Ben, if they thought he was the better graded QB!
What I didnt like about Eli at that point was that attitude towards the Chargers....
Which made me think about that deal.
Oi vay, Hootman
That last clause gives me more agita than Man Tab’s speculation.
Naaah...
I was pissed at the time, but I’ve gotten over it. I didn’t see anything out there yesterday that made me think I should be pissed that the team traded for Eli. And while the D was key to winning the superbowl, the Giants beat a team that many were calling the best team ever heading into the game. Eli engineered not 1 but 2 4 qtr TD drives. Eli won the MVP of the game, based on those drives. And they won the game with their #1 WR essentially unable to play except as a decoy. Would they have won with Rivers? Maybe. Or maybe he’d have thrown a couple of picks like yesterday and it would have been a blowout.
Nope, With the benefit of hindsight, I’m glad they made the trade.
Look at it like this. You’re playing blackjack, big pile of money bet on one hand. Dealer showing a 6. You decide to hit an 18, pull up a 3, and wind up beating the dealers 20. You made a statistically bad bet, but won a big pile of money. So, would you be sad about this?
see...
maybe if you actually watched the game…you’d realize that Eli pretty much outplayed Rivers.
And all the talk about how Eli was so good cuz of Plax and all that stupidity…Rivers has Jackson who is bigger, faster and less annoying than Plax. Gates is as big and faster than Shockey ever was, and Rivers usually has a decent second option.
Again, its not Eli’s fault the play wasn’t called to go into the end zone.
The fact that Rivers incompletion’s yesterday could be countered with the fact that Eli’s incompletions were mostly throwaway’s cuz the line sucked….there you go.
So in no way will I EVER be pissed the Giants traded for Eli and didn’t keep Rivers.
Rivers and Eli are damn equal. Given where Eli’s taken the Giants…I stay with Eli.
Get that bullcrap of switching QB’s out of here and let it stay with the idiot Cowboy fans…cuz they seem to love to throw Romo under the bus when he struggles.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and not counting yesterday's game...
overall for their careers…its like I said before..its apples and oranges.
Rivers has Norv Turner. Who, for whatever you wanna knock him for his HC ability..is a gifted offensive coordinator, so its largely his plays there.
From what I’ve seen with Rivers…he basically has a Plax(nowadays he has TWO Plax’s), a Shockey and a decent (of course not as good as it used to be) running game.
People want to take away from Eli cuz he had Plaxico…yet no one ever takes away from Rivers cuz he has TWO Plax’s and a Shockey (all of which are NOT annoying….).
Never would I EVER be pissed the Giants traded Eli for Rivers (and Merriman and Kaeding….maybe Kaeding….).
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am a cowboys fan
I have not called you an idiot so I would expect the same respect from you.
I have not said you should switch QB either…I asked your opinion about the trade now, 4 years later I believe….I don’t think Eli is bad at all. I just think Rivers would be just as good with 2 extra picks and some extra cash to maintain the defense as dangerous as it was before…..do you think your D is playing as good as it was when you the SB?
And I have never thrown Romo under the buss when he struggles. He’s no Aikman yet but he’s got good potential. Still a long way to go for him.
I didn't call you an idiot did I?
you don’t seem like an idiot Cowboy fan..and that’s confirmed cuz you say you don’t throw Romo under the bus, I’m just citing all the Cowboy fans that wanted Romo’s head..when he’s obviously a damn good QB (much like Rivers with the playoff struggles…)…they are idiots who don’t know what they have (like the Eagles fans who wanted to bench McNabb).
Yea, the 2 picks and the extra cash (..tho really not all that much extra cash considering they saved on that 1st rounder spent on Merriman….) may have been nice…if you put Merriman on teh Giants and Kaeding…that’s a speed rusher and a kicker that may have helped.
Still, No way do I re-think that trade. RIvers has a lot more developed weapons up there, Eli has a possesion guy and a whole bunch of products (give these guys time..there’s 2 very talented WR in HAM and Nicks).
And absolutely not, the D is NOT 2007 level. ITs not even close. Its not cuz of lack of talent..cuz these guys could be better. Its all injuries. Many are the nagging sort, so the bye week should help.
I apologize if you thought I called you an idiot…I was just refering to the general Cowboys fans (who I’m sure you may think are idiots too) that throw the QB under the bus when things go wrong (then throw on their Romo jersey after he beats the Eagles…)
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
no prob...all good.
yes…..some of our fans go crazy from time to time but im sure all teams have that. In Phily’s case I do think they should play Kolb after what he showed when substituting for McNabb. McNabb’s one hopper and his health are always an issue for them.
Good luck the rest of the way (not dec 6th though).
Rivers has won exactly what in his career?
The debate over Eli and Philp came to a close Jan 2007, once the Giants won the superbowl, (and yes Eli had a major role in winning it thus the superbowl MVP award) the point is moot. Secondly I doubt Rivers would cut it in New York, he likes to run his mouth a lot and the media would be all over him. I think the trade worked for both teams and thats that.
by Late for Dinner on Nov 9, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions
Eli or Rivers or Brees oh my
For the record If I was a charger fan I would rather have Drew Brees any day over Philip Rivers
by Late for Dinner on Nov 9, 2009 3:40 PM EST up reply actions
great point.....agreed 100%
San Diego f^&%ed up thinking Brees shoulder was screwed.
Imagine what Miami is going through now……they had the deal made with Brees and decided to go with Culpepper because Brees shoulder looked worse than Culpeppers knee…….oooops.
Brees is great
but would he be the same QB in Miami. In NO he has an innovated head coach and loads of offensive weapons.
He would be better than Culppeper, Penningotn and Henne so far IMO.
Sparano and Payton are both from the same Parcells tree…..Brees has proven he can do it both in San Diego and New Orelans. If Miami wouldve had Brees they wouldnt have wasted a 2nd rounder on Henne IMO……and I dont know who the hell told them to draft Ted Ginn with the 9th pick…..OMG
You're kidding, right?
It is true that Eli has a ring and Rivers doesnt but I think that ring was won because of the defense.
I didn’t see Strahan take one snap from center and it was Eli, not Tuck that guided the team on that 2 minute drive and TD to Plax.
No, I wasnt....
I think that super bowl was played great by Eli…specially in the 4th qtr….great poise for a 2nd year QB (I believe he was in his 2nd year) but what got NY to that SB was the defense play during the 2nd part of the season and the playoffs…….it’s only my opinion and what I remeber….dont kill me for it.
Where's the wet willie for Tynes?
Where’s Tynes wet willie for pretty much costing us 3 points that could’ve been a game changer? San Diego got the ball on what? the 35? that’s a huge deal to come away with 0 points and good field position.
not really
score was still 0-0 with 3 1/2 quarters of football to play. Webster on the other hand could get two willies.
not really
score was still 0-0 with 3 1/2 quarters of football to play. Webster on the other hand could get two willies.
Hey guys..lighten up already!!
Stop jumping on guys that visit us who root for other teams!..They are welcome and they share for the most part thoughtful insight..Not all of them are trolls trying to pick a fight..So let’s show them some respect back..okay?..That Man Tab seems like a decent guy..Don’t disrespect another fan..If a troll shows up and wants to get ugly I’ll be the first in line to defend who they offend, but other fans that visit here with respect derserve our utmost respect..
I agree on that..
yet still, its enough that the Giants lost. In the loss however…there was really nothing to make one of the QB’s stand out. Yea, Eli could have put the Giants up for good…yet, a run at the goal line, a WR scree after the penalty…then 2 more runs…really can’t say Eli showed anything bad on his "GW attempt (the 20 or so seconds…damn near impossible).
I just don’t wanna hear this Rivers vs. Eli stuff, when its pretty obvious that Eli is as good and the payoff was a championship already.
DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Free..
That Eli versus Phillip debate is just a bunch of malarkey..Who cares??..Eli is our QB and he is a good one..This debate and match-up between the two of them was inevitable..Now it is hopefully been put to rest..They both played a great game..Eli actually outplayed Rivers, our defense cost us to lose..Both of them did their jobs and did their jobs well..The coaches on our side decided to take the ball out of Eli’s hands and that was a bad decision and it helped fueled the loss.
I agree
he’s entitled to his opinion. We might not agree but he wasn’t flinging sh*t. He asked a valid question. A question that is often asked. Eli or Rivers? I’ll stick with Eli.
I have to agree whole heartedly with everything you said Ed
Not to bring up old business and make more trouble, but when I saw the linebackers go to the edges and blitz with no one left in the middle, I knew there was going ot be a problem.
22 yards right to sproles, and we’re lucky sprolees didn’t break a tackle and win the game there.
It was great the increased blitzing. But on that last drive it just seemed like you knew they’d keep moving down the field
The Cowboys are the France of the NFL
-thwalls
Chris Snee
It’s alright Chris, if not you it would be someone else. that’s usually how it is when the
going goes bad.
When it rains
It pours. Lets face it, Our Giants are in need of fresh help:
In Coaching, Leadership, DB’s, LB’s, OL’s and Kickers.
The OL guys are getting on in years and is getting weaker. They had some very good years.
We desperately in need of DB’s and LB’s.
It also, would be nice to have a coach with some imagination and, that has a plan B if A won’t work.
In the mean time, Lets hope the new kids will turn out to be pro bowlers.
secondary
we have to get the secondary HEALTHY quickly
by black_man_hungry@yahoo.com on Nov 11, 2009 6:13 PM EST reply actions

by 















