Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: News And Other Updates Leading Up To Pats-Giants

What do the Giants do now? Ideas for salvaging the season

via graphics8.nytimes.com
The Giants 2009 season resembles a sinking ship. Question is, can this vessel still be saved?

OK, gang. We have spent the past few days commiserating about the problems our 6-5 New York Giants are having. The hated Dallas Cowboys come to East Rutherford this week, so it is time to turn the page and look forward.

The Giants MUST (is there anything bigger than capital letters for emphasis?) win this game if they hope to salvage the season. So, the question is, what -- if anything -- can be done over the next five games to get this team going again?

First and foremost, say your prayers for Eli's foot. If he goes down to a stress fracture, find something else to do with your Sunday afternoons. I doubt the Giants will be watchable.

Anyway, here are my thoughts on what the Giants can do in an effort to salvage the season.

Star-divide

  1. Run Brandon, run! -- As we discussed Sunday, this is an obvious one. He probably isn't running as well as he did the past couple of years. And we know the line isn't blocking as well. But, the Giants have to have balance. And they have to let Jacobs try to wear defenses down. He is the guy opposing defensive players fear, and when the Giants don't make full use of him they do the defense a favor.
  2. Turn the kids loose, Tom -- Rookies make mistakes, and coaches of contending teams don't like to play them if they have a choice. Giants coach Tom Coughlin is hardly alone there. But the season has reached a point where it has become pretty obvious that the Giants aren't really contenders. And that there are certain veterans whose warranty has expired. So, let the kids play.

    -- Activate Ramses Barden -- Sure, wide receiver isn't really an issue. But, the Green Zone still is. And, yes, that probably means de-activating Derek Hagan, an idea which I hate. But, you know what? The coverage teams stink with Hagan, who might be the team's best cover guy. For now, they can stink without him. It's time to start finding out about Barden.

    -- Same for Travis Beckum -- Every snap that Darcy Johnson is on the field is really a wasted play as far as the future of the Giants. He really is not a good blocker, so if it's a blocking situation use an extra offensive lineman. If it's a passing situation, get Beckum on the field. He will never turn into a weapon standing on the sidelines, and you know by now that Johnson is pretty much just taking up roster space.

    -- Start William Beatty at right tackle. Maybe he is the future left tackle, we don't know that yet. But, continuing to play Kareem McKenzie at right tackle is going to get Eli Manning killed, Or David Carr, if Eli's 'stress reaction' turns into a fracture. It's pretty obvious that McKenzie is a pass-blocking liability, so get Beatty on the field full-time and let him begin to learn. At least you know that if he gets beat he will learn and get better.

    -- More Clint Sintim. I have to qualify this one. I know that the Giants started getting Sintim more action several weeks ago. I also know that Antonio Pierce's injury has made playing Sintim difficult. Sintim admitted recently that he was relying on AP to get him lined up and to make sure he understood what his responsibilities were, and I'd be lying if I said it didn't bother me that Sintim still needed help figuring out how to line up. But, it's really obvious that Danny Clark won't be a Giant next year, and that Clark's lack of athleticism hurts this defense. Let Sintiim make his mistakes now, in a season thatr appears to be quickly going down the drain, so that he can become the play maker we all want in 2010.

    -- Give Jonathan Goff a chance -- We have seen one good game and one bad one from Chase Blackburn filling in at middle linebacker for Antonio Pierce. Blackburn is smart, and I love the guy. I'm not sure he is athletic enough, or physical enough, to be the long-term answer in the middle, though. We know Pierce needs to be replaced, quite possibly next season. Get Goff on the field enough to find out if the kid can play.
  3. More Kiwi, less Osi. A lot less Osi -- If any Giants fan out there still thinks Osi Umenyiora is a great defensive end, all I can say is this. You are thinking with your heart, not your eyes or your brain. Osi is an atrocious run defender, and at this point in his career only a so-so pass rusher. He makes one great play every couple of games, that's about it. Mathias Kiwanuka played right defensive end all of 2008, and did a better job than Osi is doing this season. Especially against the run. Every offensive coordinator in the league knows at this point that if you need a couple of yards against the Giants, running right at Osi is the way to get it.

    One more thing. How about no more Chris Canty at defensive end? The Giants are paying him $42 million to clog the middle, which he can't do playing right defensive end when Osi isn't there. What the heck is he doing out there? Get him in the middle where he is supposed to be, and let Kiwanuka play defensive end.
  4. Boot Bill Sheridan upstairs. I know many of you would have been happy if I stopped at 'Boot Bill Sheridan.' That is not going to happen during the season, though, so I'm not even going to go there. Sheridan, though, obviously is not effective from the sideline. He is undoubtedly not a motivator. And, he can't seem to get a feel for calling the game, since so many of his calls seem to wind up leaving the Giants vulnerable. So, kick him upstairs where we know he originally wanted to be and see if he can do a better job from up there. If that doesn't work, well, then I think we know what needs to be done.

That's about all I have for now. I am curious to hear your ideas for the rest of the season. And, please, keep it to how to salvage the next five games. We have months to discuss the draft and what to do next season. It's not time to tackle that yet.

Comment 220 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don't know what to think of the running game.

They seem to start out doing it…but Jacobs just doesn’t run hard anymore. Is it that he’s not getting carries? Or are they not giving him carries cuz he’s running like a puss?

I still disagree about Osi. He seems to be doing exactly what he’s always done. He was a vulture sack type. He gets pressure of his own, but it was only when the other DE or a DT moved the QB out of the pocket, Osi was there to pick up the sack. The other guys are not doing their job.

Not sure on Barden. Sounds like a good idea….but it seemed in the ATL game the Giants found the answer with Boss (the answer was there anyway…). He’s not playing for a reason, I think.

Beckum you might not see for the rest of the season. His bonehead route that got a pass picked off by Asante Samuel, he’ll be in the doghouse for a while.

And Beatty seems to be in there, not enough…, but as a blocking TE. You take that away if you sit McKenzie. I also don’t think he’s the sole reasone. The backs seem to be boneheaded on blocks, Eli holds onto the ball too long sometimes and also…they are just getting beat by a pass rusher who will beat anyone.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 7:22 AM EST reply actions  

Osi

We definitely disagree about Osi. Of course, I have never been as high on Osi as a lot of Giants fans. I think he hurts the defense on significantly more plays than he helps it.
As for the young guys, I just think it’s pretty obvious the team is spinning its wheels the way things are now. It can’t hurt anything to give them opportunities. If nothing else, you get a better read on what you have for next season.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 30, 2009 7:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree on the youngins.

Goff and Sintim especially. I’m not sure on the offensive guys tho. Beatty, probably definitely cuz the O-Line is the biggest problem there.

Not sure on the receivers. When Eli gets time, he’s been very good throwing to the stable the Giants got.

If Hagan is the best player on ST…how do you take him out? You take him out, then they’ll be giving up TD returns. And I think its more of short line drive kicks by Tynes on the Kickoffs that’s the problem

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 7:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Could be

Barden and Beckum are tricky. I would think at some point, though, that the Giants have to get them on the field at least a little.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 30, 2009 7:58 AM EST up reply actions  

If not de-activating Hagan

What about Moss? Or has he already been being de-activated? I’m all for Barden being activated over Moss.

And another thought, for whatever reason if it’s happening, no more Hixon in three receiver sets. Let Nicks be the third WR!

by Hootman on Nov 30, 2009 8:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Moss

has not been active the past few weeks. As far as I can see Nicks is usually the third wideout. Hixon is on the field in four-receiver sets.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 30, 2009 8:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Amen,

Please no more Hixon in 3 WR sets. Ham and Nicks should be wide with Smith in the slot. It’s not rocket science, Hixon is not as good as the rookie in the WR spot.

by njgiant on Nov 30, 2009 9:45 AM EST up reply actions  

I could just picture TC saying about guys like Goff, Sintim, and Beaty

“I don’t want to lose a game becasue of any mental errors!” That’s why those guys wont play until the season is all but over. TC would rather lose with slow unathletic veterans who know what they are doing rather than young athletic guys who make mistakes. Though I agree I would like to see the youngs guys out there I don’t think it’ll happen.

Also Blackburn is a FA at the end of the season they might be sticking with him to see if he can take over for AP or if they let him walk and start bringing Goff along next year. Personally I think I know what Blackburn is; A quality backup and a nice special teams player, he’ll never be much more than that but thats what Washington thought of AP and he turned out to be good for us.

I

by Landeta on Nov 30, 2009 9:29 AM EST up reply actions  

You mean

CC Brown knew what he was doing in pass coverage and therefore did not make any mistakes – after all being useless means you do not make mistakes you are playing at your normal level.

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions  

They did replace him with Aaron Rouse though

and remeber CC was the ONLY back up saftey at the time so they had to use him. Once Rouse got up to speed they pulled CC out.

Blackburn Clark & McKenzie all know what they are doing they just can’t do it that well and until TC is forced to use a young inexperced guy he will not do it. CC was used out of necesatiy they had no other option at the time.

by Landeta on Nov 30, 2009 9:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Rolando McClain or Brandon Spikes

I hope we are not counting on Blackburn for the future. I think we should draft either McClain or Spikes. Our linebacking core would then look like this: boley, mcclain/spikes, sintim. That’s a young, athletic, and talented group to go forward with. That’s young athleticism that Giants haven’t had for a long time.

by ggggmen08 on Nov 30, 2009 10:03 AM EST up reply actions  

the thing is...

the ‘veterans’ like Mike Johnson and CC Brown have been a mental error waiting to happen.

Bruce Johnson is a rookie and doesn’t seem to have trouble seeing the field (while Kevin Dockery has been MIA).

The thing with guys like Beckum and Barden…the positions they play are not a problem so there is no reason to bring them out there.

The WR and the TE with Boss are not a problem.

Blocking is a problem. Beckum and Barden don’t block…yet.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

They don't have any other saftey's on the roster

other than CC and Mike Johnson until they signed Rouse. They have/had to play them. They don’t have to play Beaty, Goff or Sintim is my point. Like in 07 Sockey got hur they had to play Boss because Boss and fellow rookie Mathews were the only other TE’s on the roster. TC will only risk mental errors if he has no other alternative. Chase, Kareem and Danny probabbly don’t make many mental errors just physical ones.

by Landeta on Nov 30, 2009 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't care what you say.

We need to activate Scirotto off the practice squad. It can’t hurt at this point, especially with Rouse being on the field a week after picking him up.

"The Dallas Cowboys might be America's Team, but the New York Giants are America's DREAM team." -- Robert Tisch

by xMattex on Dec 1, 2009 10:04 AM EST up reply actions  

you've made your opinion felt about Osi since training camp

and never waivered ed, and i respect that. i do think however, that it is not fair to hold osi out on a pedestal, when not ONE d-linemen has stood out. and that goes for everyone’s beloved Tuck. Tuck gets a pass for playing through injury, but Osi doesn’t. that’s right, Osi’s still recouping, so to me that counts as injured. but let’s call a spade a spade, JT hasn’t played up to par; neither has Osi, or Kiwi. But i can count many times this season Osi has made an impact play. Let’s not call the man chop liver.

and guess what gentlemen? the 5 teams that beat us didn’t exclusively run left all the time. they ran right, up the middle, and all over our porous ass.

osi is not a run stopping end. we know that. neither is dwight freeney. yet the colts find a way to make due with. so let’s stop scapegoating osi, and let him do what he does.

by wilddre22 on Nov 30, 2009 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

exactly...

Osi to me is what he’s always been.

Its the other guys who haven’t held up their part of the bargain.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Tuck vs Osi

Tackles Tuck 38 Osi 20
Sacks 4.5 vs. 5
Forced Fumbles 4 – 3
Passes defensed 6 -1

PFF
Overall Tuck 5th Osi 14th
Rushing passer 12th vs. 7th
Against the run 11th vs 51st

Since Osi’s 6 sack game vs. Eagles he’s had 12 sacks in 27 games. Osi built his reputation off 1 game. His 6 sack game on national TV. He made the pro bowl off that game. Osi might be recouping off his season ending injury last year. That doesn’t explain 7 sacks in 16 games after the Eagles game.

I’m with Ed here. Osi is grossly overrated.

Freeney is 40th vs the run while he is far and away the leader rushing the QB. Robert Mathis of the Colts is the overall leader for DE.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 4:21 PM EST up reply actions  

exactly...

Mathis is the leader…but he has Freeney on the other end.

People who call Osi the best DE in football…well there’s your overrated.

He is what he is. He’ll get his rush…but if the other guy is doing nothing, Osi won’t do anything either.

Osi did not build his reputation off one game…he already had that reputation (14.5 sacks in 2005.

And I don’t blame Osi as much as the entire unit. Say what you want about Osi…he’s leading the team in sacks. The sack total of the entire unit is ANEMIC to say the least.

He’s not helping his cause…but he’s not the only one.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Don’t forget that Osi almost always gets the double team from the RB and also has to face the LT who most of the time is a better pass blocker than the RT. That is true for almost every team

by mclaren_is_the_best on Nov 30, 2009 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

you made my point exactly frank

Osi is a pass rushing end. he doesn’t do runs. he never did. let’s stop asking an old dog to learn new tricks.

Osi is a Dwight Freeney clone. you watch Freeney and every play just about, he’s up the field, trying to beat the LT. if he can’t make that corner, he does his patented spin move. I don’t hear anyone out of Indy running him out of town for running himself out of running plays.

my point on Tuck was he is also having a down year. Quote all the profootballfocus stats you want(that’s what i get for introducing the site to you guys lol!) but you can’t tell me tuck is having the same year he was last.

by wilddre22 on Nov 30, 2009 11:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Running Game

The running game is a combination of an OL that isn’t opening many holes or getting a big push and a RB in Jacobs that doesn’t run with the reckless abandon that he used to. The shelf life for running backs isn’t that long, and it is even shorter for a guy like Jacobs that used to look for contact. He has taken lots of shots to the knees. I think that’s in his head when he is running. I think he has also deteriorated as a big time RB with all the wear and tear. I don’t think it’s something that will be fixed any time soon.

If you look back at last game, Jacobs is always moving sideways trying to avoid contact and doesn’t turn it up field. There is no reason for him to have so many negative runs. I remember one play in particular where you broke through for 5 yards, saw the safetey coming towards him, and tried to bounce it to the sideline (where he was immediately tackled. The old Jacobs would’ve tried to run through that safety or stiff arm him on his way to a first down. I think we are setting ourselves up for disappointment if we think he will be the same back he has been the past few seasons.

by ggggmen08 on Nov 30, 2009 10:00 AM EST up reply actions  

b_jake in the open field

used to actually run RIGHT AT tacklers instead of trying to avoid them. He’s not shifty, so trying to avoid them actually makes him EASIER to tackle

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 30, 2009 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Agree and Disagree

I disagree with you on Osi. IMO he’s a liability.

I agree on Beckum. You and I are the only ones that seemed to notice it was Beckum’s terrible route that was the primary reason for the Samuel’s INT. That INT was on Beckum. Not Eli. Have you seen Beckum since that play? I haven’t.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

So

how is Beckum going to learn residing in the doghouse?

How is Barden when he is in street clothes?

How is Sintim if he is not getting in the flow of the game?

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree...

the thing is…they really aren’t gonna solve anything at this point. 2 rookies, a WR and a TE, are not going to solve the Giants offensive problems…of which WR/receiving TE is the last of their problems.

If we were talking about a shiny new OG or OT (ahem…Will Beatty…) then OK. Barden and Beckum are not gonna help right now.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed

But it points to the mindset of the coaches.

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 11:18 AM EST up reply actions  

Off formations and plays

Is it time that we started playing a 3WR, 1 TE and 1 RB formation as our staple one?

If we replace Hedgecock with Nicks it will force the defence to adjust to another player out wide – it does mean we lose a blocking FB so the RB has to go with what he sees, but does anyone know what the ration of run/pass plays are with Hedgecock in to see if we are that perdictable with him in the game.

I am all for letting the more talented players play – after all if they do not see playing time this season what makes you think they will be ready to play next season!

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 7:29 AM EST reply actions  

Formations

You’re reaching, here G, I think. The Giants use the single back a lot, anyway.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 30, 2009 7:42 AM EST up reply actions  

Ed

Ok – I use to be able to get splits based on formations years ago but cannot find them now!

Generally, though I just do not see us going on a tear and beating Dallas and Philly the next two weeks.

The game against the Vikings could have a real presason feel about it if both teams play their backups!

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 8:01 AM EST up reply actions  

I hear you, G Fan

I don’t see it, either, at this point. I still want to have hope, but the realistic side of me says this defense just isn’t good enough.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 30, 2009 8:04 AM EST up reply actions  

I like every one of your suggestions, Ed

I do have reservations about BJ. I’d give him a game with 25 or so carries to see how it works. If it doesn’t, let Ware and Gartrell carry the load (or see if they can.) I also have reservations about TC’s willingness to play the young guys. He’ll try to win all the remaining games and that will mean he’ll resist using them. I don’t believe he’ll turn them loose wholesale as you suggest. I’m hoping for at least some changes that give the younger players more field time.

by blue gonz on Nov 30, 2009 7:53 AM EST reply actions  

George

I think all head coaches have reservations about playing young guys, unless they know they are a bad team and need to rebuild. But, my belief at this point is in many cases it can’t hurt because the veterans are not getting the job done.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 30, 2009 7:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed but coaches are stubborn

It took the Titans owner to force Jeff Fisher to play Vince Young in place of Kerry Collins. Old man Kerry would still be starting down there if Adams did not force him to do that! TC is no different and none of our young guys are as dynamic as VY.

by Landeta on Nov 30, 2009 9:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Right, coaches are stubborn, and...

…I suspect that anyone would have a tough time convincing TC right now that he should abide by Ed’s second recommendation and play the youngsters, given that his 6-5 team (one game out of wild card contention), with 5 “one-game seasons” remaining (the next three of which against division rivals).

If we continue to tank, then perhaps they will get in during garbage time in week 16/17, but I can’t forsee this happening now.

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

stubborn and egotistical

coaches can be there worst enemy. The play calling is a perfect example. For 3 seasons the Giants have been WOEFUL on 3rd and 1. Yet it seems they keep running the same f*cking plays. They gonna keep running it until they succeed.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Play the young guys

especially if the G-Men lose this week (which seems pretty likely at the moment). I want to see what Goff can do in a four game sample, I want Sintim to mess up and get some reps, and I want to see barden in action, even if he is rather slow moving (I just want to see it).

by brisulph on Nov 30, 2009 7:53 AM EST reply actions  

+1

And while we’re at how about we cut ’Can’t Cover’ and sign one of the guys off the practice squad to see if they have a future over the next 5 games? Chances are we have to draft a safety next year whatever, but if one of these guys is useful as a back-up it gives us more options in the draft/FA around O-Line, MLB, etc

by Jonah19 on Nov 30, 2009 8:36 AM EST up reply actions  

Found it

CNNSI has the full break down on Eli’s passing stats per formation to the right, left and middle under presuure when blitzed etc

However look at these stats which are in order of

Game Comp Attt Com % Yards

Pass Thrown Behind Line of Scrimmage 11 48 76 63.2 389
Pass Thrown 1-10 yds 11 102 147 69.4 807
Pass Thrown 11-20 yds 11 45 86 52.3 836
Pass Thrown 21-30 yds 10 14 30 46.7 442
Pass Thrown 31-40 yds 7 3 10 30.0 110
Pass Thrown 41+ yds 5 2 5 40.0 100

Eli has thrown 244 passes in a single back formation and 257 passes from the shotgun – it is fair to say that alot of these two overlap, What I would like to see is Eli passing from a 3 WR set single back set whilst under centre because giving Jacobs the ball out of the shotgun is no good as the D can see what is happening and can react faster than Jacobs can hit the hole.

I think this is the link below
 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/football/nfl/players/6760/passing_splits.html#ixzz0YLd7Tmoj

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 8:19 AM EST reply actions  

The amazing thing

is that Eli has only completed 63.2% of passes thrown behind the LOS – we need RB’s who can catch the ball in a big way – hopefully Brown when he returns from injury will be that guy.

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 8:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I would bet

that a ton of those incompletions are drops by Jacobs. As for Brown, an Achilles tendon tear is incredibly difficult for a running back to come back from. I don’t know if he will ever be what he could have been.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 30, 2009 8:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Andre Brown was supposed to be Derrick Ward part deux for us....

Also, I don’t understand why they don’t use Bradshaw (when he was healthy ) on passing downs to slip out and catch the ball. Maybe its his route running/inexperience at doing so…but yea, if we had Derrick Ward there to be a safety valve…would help.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Did I just read that right?

You are saying that you DO miss Ward in your offense this year?

by sduncan24 on Nov 30, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

lol...

I guess I said in the beginning we don’t…but we do.

Well, I was assuming that Andre Brown, Danny Ware and Ahmad Bradshaw would be healthy.

Kinda hard to say we don’t miss D-Ward when 3/4 of the 4 headed monster we’re supposed to have…..is injured for all or a better portion of the season.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 11:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I know you can never say that sort of stuff

at the beginning of the season, or pre-season, but all I heard was how the Giants wouldn’t miss Spags or Ward and the Eagles wouldn’t miss Jim Johnson, and the Cowboys would be nothing without TO. At this point in the season, I think we can say that all of those things are wrong, but Jim Johnson looks to be missed less than I thought, but they aren’t the same defense without that guy (oh and that Dawkins fellow too)

by sduncan24 on Nov 30, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

I semi agree...

The Giants defense was a problem at the end of last year anyway. They do miss Spags tho.

Of course a lot of the stuff in the preseason is wrong.

The only problem with the Giants was supposed to be the passing game and WR…..when its basically been the only strength!

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Of course we miss that guy..shame where he wound up..

He must be miserable at this point..I’d take him back in a heart-beat.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

well yea...

actually in hindsight…I would’ve let Jacobs go and keep Ward!!

…no one could’ve predicted this sort of demise with the running game.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Start kiwi

and move Osi to safety to replace CC Clown, he will get about the same number of sacks and probably a better pass defender than good ole CC.

by BigBlueCrew_jfl on Nov 30, 2009 8:31 AM EST reply actions  

Osi plays safety a few downs every game...

…in BS’s zone blitzing scheme

(BTW, did anyone see the pick last night by the Ravens’ DL? That stands out in my mind as the only time I have seen that formation work to perfection)

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Predictability on offence

Looking at the stats which overlap a great deal so excuse me why I assume certain things in my logic.

Jacobs has run 76 plays from a single back formation of which 21 were shotgun.

Eli has thrown 257 passes from the shotgun and 244 from a singleback formation.

So in my logic when we go singleback with Eli under centre we mostly run the ball and when we are in the shotgun with a single back we pass the ball.

From a defensive viewpoint it is easy to gamble on if it is a pass or run.

I could be wrong but if I can see a trend here I am sure all the other teams can! However, we won six games because some of the teams we beat were poor or were not able to outscore us!

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 8:41 AM EST reply actions  

I don't have an answer

Just prayers. Stranger things have happened

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

by Willgfass on Nov 30, 2009 8:41 AM EST reply actions  

Ed please find out if this is true

I heard on the radio in Syracuse this morning Eli is now out for the season due to the stress reaction in his foot.

by Ando81 on Nov 30, 2009 9:17 AM EST reply actions  

I'd definitely like to see..

More of Kiwi in Osi’s DE spot..He did a credible job last year..I also want to see Barden especially in the red zone..I refuse to call it TCs term: Green Zone..because we have been sitting at the red light all season..It never changes to green when our cars show up, just stays red…and yes it would be nice to see more of Goff and Sintum..I don’t see much of a difference can be made to help our lines at this point…It’s too early to stir the pot just yet, it is what it is..If we lose to Dallas then perhaps they can start mixing things up..You can beg to differ, but neither Dallas or Philly look very good and certainly are beatable..Washington held their own against the Eagles and lost quite a few players doing it..Carolina is just awful..that leaves the Vikings, where we most likely will be playing a scrimmage game because they’ll play that game without key players heading into the playoffs..So, we still have a shot at going 10-6.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 9:31 AM EST reply actions  

Running

I’d love for the Giants to suddenly start running the ball more with Jacobs with authority, but they probably won’t for 2 reasons. First, they’ve become a passing team out of necessity. Teams are loading up to stop the run, so the offense is going to what the defense gives them. Second, the O-line is not preforming (which is tied with the 1st). We can harp on them to run more, but if they can’t do it effectively then how are they supposed to do it? I don’t think its as simple as saying let’s run more.

As for BS in the booth … that should have been done a long time ago. I still shake my head at how this coaching staff refuses to make changes.

by potroast on Nov 30, 2009 9:35 AM EST reply actions  

Too bad

That Tom Coughlin won’t listen to this because he’s too set in his ways. Anyone have his number or email so he knows this blog exists? Seriously. Maybe he needs to start listening to the fan base.

"The Dallas Cowboys might be America's Team, but the New York Giants are America's DREAM team." -- Robert Tisch

by xMattex on Nov 30, 2009 9:45 AM EST reply actions  

When a coach starts listening to the fanbase

he may as well resign his job right then. Even if it might help in one facet of the game (perhaps), it would just be a sign that he knows not what he does at his job.

by brisulph on Nov 30, 2009 11:20 AM EST up reply actions  

absolutely true

however, it’s also sometimes true that 50,000 good minds can come up with a better solution than 5 brilliant ones.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 30, 2009 12:06 PM EST up reply actions  

I say

Play the young guys and rest the injured veterans this team is going nowhere. 6-10 might be bad enough to draft Brandon Spikes. The Giants have not had a really good playmaking LB since Armstead and have not had a Great LB since LT, Banks, Carson, P. Johnson. They need a stud LB I miss having a playmaking maniac thats all over the field screaming and yelling.

by Landeta on Nov 30, 2009 9:49 AM EST reply actions  

Brandon Spikes

Yes. I’d love him on the Giants, but if we’re in the top 10 or Top 15 and Eric Berry or Taylor Mays fall, we HAVE to take one of them for impact. I honestly say make a trade, maybe Osi, to get an extra 1st round or 2nd round pick.

"The Dallas Cowboys might be America's Team, but the New York Giants are America's DREAM team." -- Robert Tisch

by xMattex on Nov 30, 2009 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

Didn't they use a flare pass to BJ?

I seem to recall that during 07 these sort of dump-offs that they used to get Tiki in space, get him one-on-one. Especially this weekend to get him away from the gang-tackling. You know, they should do that with all the WRs. Get isolations
 
Use Boss more.

Use the 5-wides more.

Darn it, just do about any damn thing to beat the cowboys.

by StubsNY on Nov 30, 2009 9:53 AM EST reply actions  

Everytime I do see that happen

BJ drops the ball. Perhaps they should try this with Ware, who has really good hands, so we are told.

by MJ20 on Nov 30, 2009 10:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Not yet

I want to see the young guys get in there when the season is lost. That’s one more loss away. At this point the Giants are very much in the playoff race and the NFC East race.

If they win the next 3 they own division tie breakers over everyone, they likely beat Carolina as well, then the Vikings game is huge.

Dallas has a tough schedule ahead that includes Giants, Chargers, Saints & Philly. They could very well lose all 4 and most likely will lose at least 2 of those.

Philly has it a bit easier but has Atlanta, San Fran & Denver. They probably drop one of those (and we’re assuming here that they lose to the Giants).

So assuming we win the next 3 and handle Carolina, I see the standings going into week 16 like this

Giants 10 5
Dallas 10 5
Philly 10 5

with the Giants holding divisional tie breaker over Philly and a Dallas sweep. It’s far from over BUT…winning the next 3 is much easier said than done.

by Jaybat on Nov 30, 2009 9:56 AM EST reply actions  

I guess

my logic there has Philly at 9-6, not 10-5, but we would still have the tie breaker.

by Jaybat on Nov 30, 2009 9:58 AM EST up reply actions  

That's very ambitious Jay

in the next 4 weeks….Dallas losing 2, could happen, Philly losing 2, could happen, Giants winning 4, could happen…but when you look at Dallas, Philly and all of their and our opponents, the Giants are playing the crapiest football. I really don’t think that we get to wear Cinderella’s shoe this year.

by njgiant on Nov 30, 2009 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Oh definitely

this is absolutely a best case scenario. It requires playing well which is far from reality right now. But with this almost bye week break, it’s another opportunity to get back to good football.

The point is if we play well the division could be right there to take.

by Jaybat on Nov 30, 2009 10:47 AM EST up reply actions  

Though i agree with everything Ed wrote

Until we’re mathematically out of the division and the playoffs, or at the very least, after the Eagles game, knowing TC, he’s going to roll with who has been starting.

At 6-5 with a pulse still, TC knows that doing what we are suggesting would, moreless raise the white flag. In TC’s mind, thats probably the furtherest thing he’s thinking about!

by Hootman on Nov 30, 2009 9:59 AM EST reply actions  

it aint over till its over.

I personally did NOT expect a win against Denver, cuz of the travel and conditions that Denver is at a mile above sea level.

I expected a split of the Turkey week.

They must beat one of Dallass or Philly. Split, and we’re still alive. Lose 2, we’re dead. Win two……..

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

This team abandons the run too easy

We were a good offensively (in the past) because we would wear defenses down. Not going to wear any defense down by running Bjake 11 times a game. It’s time to feed the bull. Bjake needs to run the ball 20 times minimum. I would like to see around 25 carries for him. I don’t believe the stuff about saving him for the playoffs because as it stands now, he is going to be fresh for his couch come the second season. And if we were saving him for the playoffs, then the time to use him is now because as I see it, the Giants are in the playoffs “NOW”. Any lose in the next five weeks and it’s a total wrap.

by njgiant on Nov 30, 2009 10:05 AM EST reply actions  

Re: abanadoning the run -- it comes downto down-and-distance

We have been forced to pass on 2nd down far too often this year versus in years past in part because of the inability to run the ball effectively on 1st down. How many times have we seen 2nd and 9 or 2nd and 12? The O has struggled with managing down-and-distance all year, and it has affected our ability to string together drives.

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 10:18 AM EST up reply actions  

See below post re motion and the replies

We may be stumbling (given Eli’s injury) on what has gone wrong.

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

combined with a failure to

… step up and make big plays

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 30, 2009 10:46 AM EST up reply actions  

We end up having to pass

because our defense can’t stop the other team. They score, then kickoff to us, then we go 3 and out, punt, and they score. So it ends up going in a circular motion, much like inside a toilet. We try to pass to catch up, and instead, end up punting, and putting our defense back onto the field for yet another miserable performance. I’ll say this – people are focusing on our defense, but our offense has some major issues.

We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.

by GAgiantfan on Nov 30, 2009 11:31 AM EST up reply actions  

Salvage the Season? Why?

The best we can hope for is to go 11-5. While that would send us into the playoffs, we would need to get on one hell of a hot streak to do it; but, let’s look at it more realistically: there are going to be a couple of losses along the way. So, we’re looking at 10-6, 9-7, 8-8, or worse. That won’t get us into the playoffs, not this year, not unless we sweep Dallas and Philly and both they and the Redskins have horrible endings to their seasons.

That’s a gamblers mentality, and it’ll only wear out our team for the remainder of the season, and make team unity a difficult task come next season. To hell with that.

The remainder of this year, I think, needs to be spent developing younger talent. We’re not going to make the playoffs this year, and if we do how far do you think we’ll actually get? This isn’t 2007 where we had a shot in every game, this is 2009 where we’ve been blown out in almost every loss.

Where do we start?

Deactivate Manning and Pierce. Manning is obviously too hurt, and Pierce is not only hurt, but he’s slowed down considerably this season. I know Carr and Blackburn don’t exactly inspire the team, but Carr will be starting in Oakland next year and Blackburn has a good head for the game, he just doesn’t get enough playing time. At least Blackburn can get off of tackles and stop the run up the middle.

Bill Sheridan moves up into the booth. The NY media is calling for his head, but the Giants have some wiggle room here, specifically that he was talked into staying on the sidelines. They’ll give him another year to work out the kinks. Maybe half-year, if he keeps dropping Tuck back into coverage.

For the rest of this year, I don’t want to see Osi in on 3rd-and-short, and 4th downs. In fact, I don’t want to see him in on first downs either, unless it’s against a pass-happy team. Osi has played himself into being a one-down lineman, and he deserves it.

You can’t do anything about the two DT’s up the middle right now, so you’ve got to rely on your LB’s to take care of the run that way. Keep the LB’s in a middle zone coverage at all times, and let the CB’s worry about covering the WR’s. If our LB’s are in the middle all the time (instead of pursuing players to the outside), we’ll be able to more effectively stop the short pass, while slowing down the run up the gut. That’ll put us in a edge weakness position, but we’ve been weak on the edges all season long, so it’s not like we’re creating a problem that doesn’t already exist.

Speaking of problems, the CB’s need replacing. We can’t exactly replace them with anyone, though. I think the best option here is to drop the CB blitz, and instead stick with the LB blitz.

None of this will perfectly shore up this defense, but I think it’ll give us a better opportunity to win, if the offense can get things going.

Getting the run game going is the only way the Giants are going to score again this year. Denver was dropping 8 and sometimes 9 people back into coverage! How the heck is Eli (or, in my scenario, Carr) supposed to throw it to someone if you’ve only got three guys going out there?

Unless you’ve got some of the most talented receivers in the league, you can’t. Therefore the only answer the Giants have is to run the ball. They don’t even have to run it effectively – just keep running it. Go 3 and out a couple of times on a short run loss, if you have to. Don’t stop running the ball.

In fact, I’ll take it a step further: you can call pass plays, but make sure Eli audibles to a run play. Every down. If you call a run play, stick with it and fake the audible. If you call a pass play, audible to the run. Every down. The ONLY time you switch it up is when the defense has started to key in on what you’re going to do – and make that Eli’s call as the field general, not Gilbrides.

I know it’s just trickery to try and keep the opposing defense honest, but you need it because the offensive line ain’t doing jack. Denver dropped 8 men back into coverage, leaving 3 men on the line – and Eli still had less than 2.5 seconds to stand in the pocket. That is completely unacceptable. When the opposing defense is only rushing three guys, Eli should have all year to wait around – flat footed – and find an open receiver deep in the end zone.

It’s not just the pass blocking that’s broken, the run blocking has been atrocious. The NY media is bringing heat down on Brandon Jacobs for running side to side and not getting turned around fast enough. Why blame him? Whenever Brandon is on the field, the defense crowds the line and waits – if it’s a run, they’ve effectively stopped the big guy, and if it’s a pass, it’s usually a short one because Brandon is NOT and effective pass blocker. So, the opposing defenses don’t lose anything by not crowding the line.

What do you do? Make the defenses lose something. Don’t use Brandon as a pass blocker – send him over the middle. At the moment, we’re sending him to the outside, and short – that’s not a good place for Brandon to be. He’s taller than most backs, and can take a hit, so sending him on a route down the middle might be his best option. You don’t do this TOO often, but out of the I formation, you want to break up the monotony of “run to the sides” and “short pass to smith” with something else.

Beyond that, the passing game has been stellar – especially when it comes to the NY Giants. You can’t really blame Manningham, Smith, or Nicks for the failures on offense. In fact, they’re the only reason we have any hope to begin with. I say, just keep playing them the way we have been.

There is one more thing I’d change up: go no huddle. You don’t have to go to a permanent two minute offense, but Eli – like his brother Peyton – needs time at the line of scrimmage to see the defense. He needs to be able to scan the field, take time to make his reads, and then snap the ball. The 10 seconds that Gilbride & Co are giving him after the play is called isn’t enough.

That’s what I’d do the rest of the season. But, honestly, the season is over. What I’m focusing on right now is talent development (put the rookies in, let them make their mistakes in a season that doesn’t mean anything), and then draft for defense.

The absolute worst part about this season is that even with 6 wins – even if we lose every game here on out – we’d still get a stuck-in-the-middle BS first round pick. Unless there was an outstanding first-round LB that fell to the Giants position, I’d trade the pick for a few second rounders. We need a lot of padding on both lines, give us a reason to drop CC Brown, and get us a backup/replacement for Kenny Philips (that arthritic knee could be a career ender).

by LordKaT on Nov 30, 2009 10:08 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Giants can not afford

to give Sheridan another year. In 07 the Giants were awful in their first 2 games under Spags. It took Spags and the D 2 games to turn around the season. BS has had 11 games. If it hasn’t been done in 11 games what makes anyone believe another season will fix the problems?

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree with everyone out here that wants to toss the towel in..

With 5 games left..it is ridiculous an unspeakable in my mind..Would I like to see some of the young guys?..Sure..I think Barden as I said could make a difference in red zone offense..I’d like to see Sintim and Goff, but if they don’t know where to line up what good can they do if we’re still in the hunt?..We have 5 games left..and our targets, Dallas and Philly are not playing very good football either..I won’t buy into what we are discussing until we get beat by those two rivals..and frankly they are in no better shape than we are..they just have a little more luck on their side at the moment..We can change that with 5 solid games.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 10:10 AM EST reply actions  

right...on paper, two of our games are very winnable (Washington/Carolina)...

…that would get us to 8-8 at worst…if we can eek out one win against another division rival, it may just be enough to sneak in (and be subsequently knocked off in a divisional playoff game, I’m guessing).

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 10:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Step I agree with Wash/Carolina

But Dallas and Philly are not playing good football..and the Vikings won’t have their starters playing for long at the end assuming they don’t fold up..So what is all this jazz about us giving up on our team?

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 10:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree

They ALL are winnable. Plus I really feel like the Denver loss was worse for us than the players. The ownership and coaches set the team up for failure in that game with their negativity surrounding the game. Is there any wonder that they didn’t show up to play?

Anyway, the only team that is clearly better than the Giants is Minny. The Giants can absolutely win the rest.

by potroast on Nov 30, 2009 10:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Every game is winnable for every team when the game starts

Its just what the players do afterwards that determine who wins

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

by Willgfass on Nov 30, 2009 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Plus..

These players are getting paid millions of dollars to play a 16 game season..You all want to waste a third of the season running an “in-house” scouting camp in the regular season?..Please pass me that joint..

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 10:18 AM EST up reply actions  

And that's the scary part
Dallas and Philly are not playing very good football either

They may not be playing well but they are finding ways to win those games, that’s what contenders do. When we don’t play well, we lose and in embarrasing fashion. Hell, this year’s team has lost games that we played well in (Arizona, San Diego).

I don’t see myself as tossing in the towel. I see myself looking at my team with my eyes and not my heart.

by njgiant on Nov 30, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Very true nj..

The eyes can’t fool you..the heart can..but I’m not ready to throw away 5 games..The Dallas and Philly games will be my final barometer..

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 10:53 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not looking forward to those 2 games

two teams with WRs (Austin & Jackson) that have the potential to run through, behind and around our secondary and two TEs (Whitten & Celek) that our defense has no answer for. I’ll be shocked if we are 3 point favorites at home.

by njgiant on Nov 30, 2009 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Jackson's hurt though

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

by Willgfass on Nov 30, 2009 11:52 AM EST up reply actions  

Motion

I am on my nobby horse on the passing game.

Of Eli’s 354 passing attempts only 83 have been with a man in motion!

He has only attempted 110 passes from under centre.

Apart from the Washington game Eli’s passer rating for every other game is either over 100 or below 65!

Now how about this stat (which ignores Carr)

Jacobs and Bradshaw have run the ball 289 times of which 45 were from the shot gun. This means that when Eli is under Centre the play balance is 244 running plays to 110 passing plays.

So Eli under Centre expect run – Eli in the shotgun expect pass

No wonder defences are killing us they only have to look where Eli stands to know what the play is.

This is so depressing looking at these stats and it makes it clear that we are giving the OL a bad time when perhaps they have not got a chance if the D knows what is coming one play to the next.

I sorry Ed bur reading this means Gilbride has to go.

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 10:15 AM EST reply actions  

I wonder if the lack of passes from under center is connected to his plantar fasciitis?

Because it is easier to set up and pass out of the shotgun than take a 5- or 7-step drop and plant off the injured foot…

I wonder to whatextent, if any, the play calling in the passing game has been designed to diminish the load on Eli’s foot?

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 10:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Two points

If he is under centre he still need to hand the ball off to the RB which requires foot movement.. The DL and LB crowd the LOS as they do not fear the pass leaving no lanes for Jacobs and Bradshaw/Ware.

Secondly you have tipped your hand on what you are doing – the DL pin their ears back not fearing the run, the LB’s blitz and this leaves the OL looking helpless or hopeless.

However, this still does not explain why the D is playing so poorly!

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 10:31 AM EST up reply actions  

The real test of this metric would be to determine...

…how our ratio compares to the average number of run/pass plays from under center across the league. My intuition is that most, if not all, teams run more from under center than they do throw the ball from that formation. Still, a 70% clip in our case seems high.

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 10:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Packers

Picking another team at randon other than the Colts!

Rodgers of the Packers has 380 attempts (ignoring sacks) of which 221 were from the shotgun giving a net of 159 from under centre.

Ryan Grant has 209 carries of which 17 from the shotgun giving a net 192.

So that gives a split of 159 to 192 which is getting close to 50:50 by the time you include sacks as compared to our near 70:30 split.

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 11:02 AM EST up reply actions  

not to blow a hole in this theory...

…because what I really want to do is shore up the methodology, but not counting Aaron Rodgers runs, other Packers backs havecarried the ball 49 times (no clue how many of those were from under center). Something tells me that when considering these as well, their ratio is more towards 60:40, if not higher…

But again, one randomly sampled team…I imagine a lot of it depends on what formations a team typically relies heavily on.

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

I have ignored

Rodgers runs and just looked at formation data (have you looked at the link I posted) as it is broken down.

If Rodgers is not in the shotgun he is under centre. Of Grant’s total runsI I have deducted those from the shotgun to give those where the QB is under centre.

Yes you can add other RB’s to make it exact.

Looking at Eli’s stats the formation where he completes the highest % of passes is from the I formation – it is a low number of attempts I agree – but indicates teams may not be expecting the pass or we pass from that formation well.

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 11:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Saints

Brees has 154 pass attempts under centre – Bell and Thomas have 217 rushing attempts from non shotgun formations.

You can factor a heavy dose of runs to kill off games.

by G Fan in England on Nov 30, 2009 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

G Fan - You, sir, are a genius

I love that you did all that research for me. I stated over a month ago that the Giants are giving away their plays by their formations. People wanted to rip me a new one and tell me that I don’t know anything about football. But you have found the proof in the pudding! Gilbride has no originality and it is obvious from these stats.

by ggggmen08 on Nov 30, 2009 10:45 AM EST up reply actions  

G..You need to come over here and takeover for Gilbride

We have all been noting how telegraphed our offense is, and your analysis proves it..

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 11:01 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly that is why Gilbride has to go and why the fans don’t like him. He is very predictable and the only reason why our offense has had the success that it has is because Eli is a pretty good QB and of course the O Line was playing well. Absolutely nothing to do with the schemes and play calling

by mclaren_is_the_best on Nov 30, 2009 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

Ando81..The New York Post..

Is reporting that the Giants are considering benching Eli for remainder of the season to avoid him injuring his foot any further…That leaves us with Carr if in fact they decide to do that.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 10:34 AM EST reply actions  

Maybe playing Carr could have positive results?

The guy is in a contract year and is desperate to prove to some club out there that he deserves a shot as a #1 again. Who knows, maybe he plays lights out? (or, conversely, maybe he tries to force it too much and stinks up the joint?)

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree Step..

Carr does not want to be a back-up QB..and if they decide to protect Eli, it would be a big opportunity for him going into next season..He is not a bad QB by any stretch, and he has recovered from his beatings..So who knows?

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 10:40 AM EST up reply actions  

This could also

force KG to run more, which if I’m not mistaken is a small request of this board.

by Jaybat on Nov 30, 2009 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks the DJ that mentioned it is questionable at best for info

Carr is a 50/50 no matter what the way the line is playing he will be running for his life which he is an expert at. It could also force the running game to step it up and play like we know they can

by Ando81 on Nov 30, 2009 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Your welcome Ando..I think

The Giants staff finally decided to take possible preventative action..Eli is a tough kid, but they probably saw enough to do additional tests and evaluations..They will most likely have to tie him up and hide his helmet and uniform if they decide to make this move..Carr is not a bad QB, in fact we are lucky to have him…So all is not totally lost, but we are getting there.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 10:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Honestly, if we are to salavage the season...
  1. must be step up and make big plays.

As much as I joke about it, seriously, when was the last time anyone out there on either side of the ball made an impact play? We have been the essence of mediocrity for seven weeks now, including the win against Atlanta. Play up to your talent, you mutts!

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 10:44 AM EST reply actions  

PLAY LIKE YOU WANT TO WIN

As far as I am concerned, there should be no talk of firing anyone, and no talk of throwing in the towel this year. I believe that we still have a chance to go all the way this year, that the talent on the team is capable of beating each of our upcoming opponents (e.g., if the Raiders beat the Eagles, anything is possible on any given Sunday. It’s a cliche because it’s true!). If activating Barden, giving more playing time to Sintim, or whoever, is going to give us a competitive advantage, then great- let’s do that. There is a long offseason following the super bowl, and I think we ought to wait to evaluate talent at that time. Until then, I think we should expect the Giants to step up and play like they want to win- something we haven’t seen since we went to Dallas in week 2.

by B-B-BLUE on Nov 30, 2009 10:47 AM EST reply actions  

Step up and make big plays.

"I think that as an offense as a whole there are going to be times when we are going to need guys to step up and make big plays."

—Shaun O’Hara, 01/05/2009

"Sometimes teams are very fortunate and sometimes they’re not, right now we aren’t very fortunate, but we are going to have to fight through it. Guys understand that other guys need to step up and make big plays."

—Michael Strahan, 11/13/2003

"He is a key player, a big player, and big players have to step up and make big plays. "

—Fred Robbins, re: Osi Umenyiora, 10/21/2007

Q. Aaron, you have played five games in your NFL career. Can you talk about how much it means to you to step up and make big plays like you have thus far in your career?

A. It means a lot. It means a lot to this team. That’s one of the reasons that coach and the whole organization drafted me: to make plays. And I have to stand up to my end of the bargain.

—Aaron Ross, 10/07/2006

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

+100

this to me is the single biggest factor in the slide since the beatdown by the Saints. It’s like that loss rocked the team’s world and they haven’t recovered from it yet. Sure, some guys are playing hurt and there are huge liabilities on the defensive side, but this team, at least to me, is essentially the same team that ripped off five good wins.

So what’s changed? I think they got comfortable with the identity that they were cultivating and listening to and believing a little too much to all the accolades they were getting from the media and the prognosticators. But when they were faced with adversity they didn’t, and still don’t have the mental toughness or heart to dig deep like they did when they played with the mindset of underdogs. They flourished in that role and when they lost, at least for the most part they went down swinging.

They sure as heck ain’t playing anywhere near that type of scrappers football now, save for Eli, who always gives it his best shot, even when his play is off. The defense especially I think is reflecting the zero emotion of their coach, Sheridan. That guy just flat out underwhelms me.

Bloozer

by blooz on Nov 30, 2009 6:07 PM EST up reply actions  

+1000

Lots of truth to this post. The Giants D was exposed. Their ego was bruised. No one on the D side took a look in the mirror asking are they playing hard.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Our slide happpens to coincide with the time when AP opened his big mouth and bashed the Raiders...

…who, by the way, as lousy as they are, have knocked off two good teams (Philly/Cincinnati) since then, one more W than us.

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 11:38 PM EST up reply actions  

funny how people just write off the Giants win against the Raiders...

yet, they beat 2 good teams. Was it really against horrible competition, or were the Giants just playing up to their potential?

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Dec 1, 2009 8:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Great Post

There’s not a single item I disagree with. In ’07 Giants were playing most of the rookies. They flourished. They were an integral part of the SB run. Ross, Smith, Alford, Boss, M Johnson and Bradshaw all made major contributions.

Osi is a real dilemma. He’s a major liability on defense. He plays with no discipline. He’s all out for the sack. The rest of his game suffers. There’s absolutely no contain on the run. Is there a more overrated defensive player in the NFL?

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 10:50 AM EST reply actions  

I don’t think that is fair to Osi, he has tried to play the run on first down – you’re not giving him credit. Yes he did get manhandled out there on Thursday but there is a reason why there are linebackers and none of ours are playing any better and giving Osi help.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Nov 30, 2009 11:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Look up Osi's stats

Eliminating sacks he averages less than 2 tackles per game. His sack numbers are also down. Using PFF, Osi is 55th vs the run for DE. He’s 6th rushing the passer. It’s time to being him in only for passing downs.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 11:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Kiwi is 44th against the run so it’s not like it will be a huge improvement. That is probably why they are putting Canty at RE but if our LB and DT’s played better then this wouldn’t be needed. They are the most responsible for running plays so they should get called out as well.

by mclaren_is_the_best on Nov 30, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions  

PFF

Also I’m not so sure how accurate this “PFF” is because it says that Tuck has 7 sacks this year when he actually only has 4.5

by mclaren_is_the_best on Nov 30, 2009 11:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Grading

I don’t believe they use 1/2 sacks. If a sack is shared each sacker gets credited for a sack. They don’t grade via stats. They grade each play. A player receivers a 0 if they d what’s expected.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 11:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Agree

44th is better than 55th. LMAO

Kiwi is not the answer vs the run.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 12:56 PM EST up reply actions  

They played the rookies in 07 becasue they had too

They were thin at corner, remeber Webster looked like a bust until he was forced into action, thats why Ross started.

Bradshaw played becasue Ward broke his foot in week 12 and it took the coaches till week 16 to actually play him they used Ruben Droughns as their #2 till then.

Boss and Smith only played becasue Shockey got hurt. Other than Shockey the only TE’s on the roster were rookies in Boss and Mathews. Shockey getting hurt gave them a reason to use Smith in the slot if not he would have sat on the bench with Boss

Alford played sparingly until the playoffs and did not play that much then. Yes he had a sack on Brady in the SB but he really did not play very much other than long snaping during the course of the season.

M. Johnson started a couple of games becasue Gibril Wison and James Butler were injured and he was there only backup at saftey. Other than that he was a specail teams guy.

My Point is they were more or less forced to use rookies in 07 becasue they had no other altertnatives. Ross like Nicks this year is the only rookie they volunarly used and a lot like this year with the WR position it’s was because they were rebuilding the CB position in 07. That is not the case this year.

by Landeta on Nov 30, 2009 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

And that's my point

In 07 they were forced to play the rookies. When given the chance the rookies performed. 2009 is quickly becoming a lost season. Give the rookies a chance. They can’t do any worse than Clark, CC, AP and others.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 11:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm not dissagreing with you

about playing the rookies I’m just stating why they won’t and why they did in 07

by Landeta on Nov 30, 2009 1:19 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Osi began suffering

from cranial inflatitis right after the SB win. He was openly and publicly challenging Strahan’s position as the premier player/leader on defense. It looked on the outside like just good natured fun but you could tell that Osi was getting full of himself and it only got worse during his time in Hawaii in the interviews I saw there. The tirade he threw on the sidelines last week was a temper tantrum of someone who wasn’t getting his way.

Bloozer

by blooz on Nov 30, 2009 6:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Same

when he walked out of training camp when BS criticized his play. BS probably spoke some true words that Osi’s ego couldn’t swallow.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

This is a One-game season

If the Giants win, can turn into a string of one-game seasons.

They have to beat the cowboys. Period. Nothing else.

by StubsNY on Nov 30, 2009 11:06 AM EST reply actions  

I scrolled through the Dallas site..

I never leave any comments, I would only leave respectful ones if I did..But you get the feeling that they see this game as a big one..and I think they are a tad bit bitter about us breaking in their new stadium for them..I foresee a huge battle ahead…but they obviously hate Eli..and they actually don’t think much of Romo over there either..so I got the sense of genuine fear of the Giants game.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 11:15 AM EST reply actions  

I got the sense of fear

in the SD, ATL, DEN and now this game.

It seems that while we all may see a pile of crap of a team…most others see a team that is just a gigantic WTF!??…..but capable of snapping out of this at any second.

THe Giants are not dead until they are dead.

I’d assume the Cowboy and Eagles fans will think of their upcoming Gints games as must wins in order to slay the Giants.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Free, that's exactly what I gathered from reading through their sites..

We are sticking a fork in our team, while they are worrying about whether it will be their team on the barbecue grill…One thing I’m proud of is the fact that I saw no critical posts from our BBV guys out there on their sites..unlike what we get (which is very entertaining to me actually..I love to play with our pet Trolls)..Clearly we are not out of this hunt yet.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 11:33 AM EST up reply actions  

If I learned one thing last year

it’s that you’re not out of it until the MATH says you’re out.

I’m an Eagles fan living in NY, and I have a respect for the Giants (ALL my wife’s family are Giants fans)…I don’t like to see them struggling like you guys have been. On the other hand, if the Cowboys were to go 0-16 and lose every game by 40 points, I would revel in glory!!!

In any case, I’m a BIG Giants fan this weekend…let’s knock the Cowboys down a couple rungs!!!!

"What did it feel like? That collision, I ­didn't feel nothing, because he was pretty much defenseless. It was like running through a cardboard box. Seriously. Cardboard box."- Sheldon Brown on his pounding of Reggie Bush in the '06 Playoffs

by jalarsen1 on Nov 30, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions  

that's what I've been thinking for a few weeks.

While the Eagles last year somwhat resemble the 2007 Giants…this year’s Giants somewhat resemble your Eagles from last year.

And once you get into the playoffs…it seems that squeaking in/playing your best football in December translates better to playoffs success.

We gotta do it tho. Gotta get wins.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Glad to have you in our corner..if only for one week..lol

You obviously marired into a good family..haha..But obviously the following week you will have understandably different feelings..but don’t worry about being surrounded by in-law Giants fans..I am also surrounded on multiple fronts..My wife is a Cowboy fan, and my brother-in-laws are Eagle fans..It is nightmarish..If your like me you make believe your right in there cheering, while mumbling not very nice things under your breath..but during head to head games..all bets are off..anything goes..haha

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 12:18 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm just curious what sparked the Eagles?

W/O looking anything up etc… at what point was there a competitive turnaround? A certain week, play etc…? I do remember, i think it was about halfway thru the season last year when the Kolb in for McNabb suggestions were brought up. The topic was on a different site (not BGN, or maybe?) as i wasn’t here then!

I just thought the Giants had turned the corner against SD, then the Atl. game was a head scratcher and Den., whatever that was? Nothing seems to come together that gives a glimpse or hope of what may be better!

by Hootman on Nov 30, 2009 12:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Hard to even say what sparked a turnaround

This season we’ve either beaten teams big or lost close (NO blew us out in Kolbs first start)…

We had an inability to win the close game, but we’ve done it 2 weeks in a row now. One article I read today argues that McNabb has been more daring in his throws, trusting his receivers to make plays, where in the past he would either throw a dirt ball or take a sack. It seems each year McNabb struggles, people call for his head, and then he turns things around to finish the season strong…we’ll see.

"What did it feel like? That collision, I ­didn't feel nothing, because he was pretty much defenseless. It was like running through a cardboard box. Seriously. Cardboard box."- Sheldon Brown on his pounding of Reggie Bush in the '06 Playoffs

by jalarsen1 on Nov 30, 2009 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I never stick a fork

in my team even when I’m ripping them for crap play. True Giants fans never pull the fork until the math says to pull it.

Unfortunately for my son I instilled that mindset in him too. So, he gets to suffer along with me now when things aren’t going good!

I took him to a game back when Kanell was the QB and it was a Monday nighter against the Cowboys. Big Blue got their tails handed to them that night and in the fourth qtr I suggested we get rolling because we had a long ride. I think we were down something like 24-7 or similar but my kid, 11 at the time says to me, “come on Dad, it’s the Giants, they can still come back and win it!” hahaha! I taught him a little too good I think. We sat there till the bitter end, surrounded by Cowboys fans, rooting the whole time!

Bloozer

by blooz on Nov 30, 2009 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

BLITZ!

We haven’t been able to stop it or execute it. Something has got to give!

by Last year in Sec 127 on Nov 30, 2009 11:40 AM EST reply actions  

Love the thoughts Ed...

and I would be happy to see each come to fruition. BUT, I doubt TC or KG will move forward with any of them. I fear that if we don’t beat the Cowboys this weekend, the alarms need to be sounded and everyone will be yelling “Abandon ship!”

by CCE718 on Nov 30, 2009 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

We kinda stink...

I hate to say it, but we do. I totally agree except on a couple things. Hagan is good on ST, then keep him, we need as much help as we can get on that. I think we’ve got the worst coverage team/kicker in the game. Tynes has to go, fast. OK, he won the game in 07 against GB but missed a FG that game and what have you done for me lately? Miss chip shot field goals..didn’t he miss an extra point a couple weeks back or is he just that bad that i think he did. He’s probably not had more than 3 touchbacks this year. We always seem to get the ball on D at like the 38 yard line on kickoffs.

Blackburn has heart, but honestly, he’s a backup, Pierce is fat and overrated, look at him on the sidelines…chubby! Clark is just old, not really sure why he’s there, play Sintim, he’s a second round pick, come on! lets see what he’s got, if not move Kiwi back…do something. i see Clark and I wanna slowly hand him a cain, that backup TE has to go..play the rookie please. Canty has to play more, he gets paid so much! I expect to see more of him next year, isn’t Robbins in his last year? Osi had major surgery last year, he’s a keeper, probably should have started him on the bench and work him in slowly, but he does have a TD, almost 2, and a couple of rec. fumbles.

BJ kinda is a letdown but is it the O line or does he just not wanna get hurt and running soft? I mean he’s bigger than everyone, and having a sub par year. we paid him a lot of money..not even near what we pay Bradshaw and he’s got better numbers except yards..barely

Our return guys suck, when’s the last time we ran the ball past the 50 on a kickoff? Last playoff game vs Philly? When’s the last TD on a kickoff? We should trade Moss (BUST) and a few picks to Minn. for Harvin.

The way we look right now, and if Eli is out..were done I think. We may win 9 games if we don’t turn this thing around. I have been watching the Gmen play for 12 years or so, seen a lot of great games, beating Minn by 41, beating GB and Dallas in the playoffs, and a lot of crap games…last Thursday, against the Browns last year…. we need to at least finish strong Gintz!

by GintzFan4life on Nov 30, 2009 12:27 PM EST reply actions  

That was a respectable post

except for the one comical line about trading Moss and picks for Harvin. Rick Spielman would slap the taste out of Jerry Reese’s mouth if Reese were to approach him with this trade.

by njgiant on Nov 30, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions  

yea...

unless those ‘picks’ are the Giants first rounders for the next 3 years….that makes no sense.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

we don't need help at WR

Coming into the WR was supposed to be our biggest weakness. It’s turned into our biggest strength.

Yeah Harvin would help our return game. Do you think Vikings are just gonna trade Harvin for Moss and a few picks?

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with most but...

Jacobs…Jacobs needs to learn to cut harder and faster… Doesnt matter that he is 264lbs and huge… he needs to avoid the low blocks.. he will blow his knees. thats why he gets stopped.. because i can gaurentee that before a team plays the giants.. they talk about getting much lower then jacobs. which is easy.. but if he can cut and move and they try to tackle him i well tell you now they will not bring him down cause of his size… Thats his benifit.. and it will wear them out.
Hixon…. hes gotta go.. i have seen him drop more passes then complete this year. he is fast sure, but he has hands with no thumbs.
Barden…. needs to be tried out.. nuff said
Defense… 3 front… 4 back.. we have to aid what we dont have .. thats mid field and pass block. most of the guys have the athleticisim to keep an eye on both A pitcher isnt always gonna strike them out… he needs to have players in the outfield.
Offense…. still a good group.. but need to have back ups.. rotations need to be made… esp if we are a time clock controlling team.

by S OzZy825 on Nov 30, 2009 12:53 PM EST reply actions  

guess I was reaching on Harvin

Maybe 1st round pick for 4 years..that silly trade wouldn’t even work on Madden. Thx for the feedback…I’ve got dreams of being a sports writer and or GM one day..Go big blue!

by GintzFan4life on Nov 30, 2009 1:12 PM EST reply actions  

If you have aspirations of a GM, how about this

Your the Rams’ GM and i’ll trade you Osi for your 2 round pick and a conditional 2011 5th rounder?

by Hootman on Nov 30, 2009 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Whats w/the Oline all of a sudden??

by GintzFan4life on Nov 30, 2009 1:17 PM EST reply actions  

its more of Jacobs....

when AB was in there and healthy, and when Ware was holding onto the ball…they did fine, good even.

Jacobs has been pussified by his contract.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 1:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm sorry, the O-Line has sucked all year.

It’s a combo of the runners and line, true, but the line has not gotten the push it has in the past, it is beaten way too often, both in pass and rush. Jacobs is slowed, may be getting to the end — how long did Joe Morris last? Rodney Hampton? Tiki was a freak — got better as he got older.
Jacobs is more typical of a RB. A few good years, then diminished returns then out of football… Hell, Edgerrin James in his prime was much better than BJ, and see what happened to him?
It’s the way of the RB. Jacobs is on that path.

by ZILLAG on Nov 30, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree

the line has taken plenty of steps back. Pass protection they are good…but can get beat on stupid plays (3 men blocking Vonnie Holliday…let Dumervil run pas for the sack—of course compounding by a bad block by Jacobs).

The run blocking? also a step back, but after TiVO ing it a lot, its more of the RB….Jacobs, not making the cut like he used to.

When Bradshaw was healthy and even in the Broncos game when Ware was on the field and they ran with him…there are holes there.

There are holes to be hit….maybe if Jacobs hits the hole where he’s supposed to, eventually those big holes will open after the defense over pursues?

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Not to be annoying but

but thats why I wanted to trade Jacobs in the offseason maybe to ARZ for Boldin. I had a bad feeling BJ would wear down just not this soon.

by Landeta on Nov 30, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions  

We already have an Anquan Boldin (type)

His name is Steve Smith and he is 5 years younger, has better stats across the board and is injury free. Let Boldin and his injuries stay in the desert.

by njgiant on Nov 30, 2009 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I wanted to that last offseason

before we knew how good Smitty was not now. And I love Smitty, but he’s not Anquan Boldin maybe Nicks is a couple of years

by Landeta on Nov 30, 2009 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Smith has been awesome this year

and Nicks could be the man if we gave him more targets. Unfortunately he has to split some of his reps with Hixon.

by njgiant on Nov 30, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

accountability -

The front office misjudged the talent. The talent misjudged the talent. Both front office and talent are at a loss, and while the coach takes responsibility, and I see lips moving in that direction in regards to the players, I don’t see it on the field. They want to go home. They have written off this season. Some have pride, I’m sure. Probably most. But their fragile psyches have been bushwhacked and, all their protestations aside, they believe they stink, 2009 is lost, they are not who they thought they were, and it hurts them. So now they flounder, showing no improvement — most especially the D — meaning that they aren’t learning, meaning that they don’t believe they can, meaning that they won’t, meaning: no accountability. So, what to do to improve this team — we all thought it was too early — but rebuild your O-line. Rethink your D-line. Studs! We need one on each line, nimble, powerful, fast studs. Don’t have ‘em now. The WRs will be fine. Eli will be Eli, hot and cold, on and off, win you a bunch, lose you a bunch, win more when his D clicks (duh). He does have an intangible: 4th quarter ability to make things happen. It’s there, he hasn’t lost it, but he has no supporting cast — not to say he’s elite, he isn’t and won’t be. But it all starts with accountability from top to bottom. The fish has been rotting these past 12 months ( yes, all year) and, like the Emperor and his invisible coutre, no one wanted to call them on it. Stop the rotting. Be accountable through action. Top to bottom.

by ZILLAG on Nov 30, 2009 1:19 PM EST reply actions  

By all means, everyone has to be accountable

From JR to the players. It’s just so happened that alot of what was expected, has crumbled into mere question marks. No one is perfect as a GM, nor are the players carbon-copies from the past. It’s now moreless a realization that some decisions were not as great, coupled with the fact that players may have hit the end, presumably?!

Sometimes as fans, we do hit the panic button too soon, at the right time or way too late. But at this time with our current resources and time moving forward, IMO, were somewhere in a grey area! So in some capacity, we’ll be alright.

by Hootman on Nov 30, 2009 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Rest of season

Play the rookies and 1st year players. See what you’ve got. Reese will have a better sense of what he will need next year.

Also, Reese needs to start thinking about a new coach and staff.

by dram57 on Nov 30, 2009 1:22 PM EST reply actions  

Eli

I disagree that Eli will be Eli. I think that with a new coach and offensive coordinator, he will become better and more consistent.

coughlin and gilbride have stiffled Eli for years. Get rid of them!

by dram57 on Nov 30, 2009 1:24 PM EST reply actions  

Eli is a good, not great, QB with a special gift, that's all he has to be -

- another coach may bring something out we havent seen, it’s possible, but I doubt it. I’ll stand by Eli ending his career (possibly with another ring) with decent, not great stats. His balls flutter too much - a coach can’t take that out, not after 6 years, he can’t throw well in the wind, and he’s often too wild with his throws when trying to avoid a sack — the latter can be corrected. Nah, Eli will be Eli.

by ZILLAG on Nov 30, 2009 1:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah but an OC that actually knows what to do will allow him to have more easy throws / no pass rush in his face in 2 seconds.

How often do you see the colts receivers or the saints receivers being WIDE OPEN deep down the field? Often. When was the last time a giants receiver was wide open? 2006? I don’t even remember

by mclaren_is_the_best on Nov 30, 2009 1:38 PM EST up reply actions  

About the GM Q..

How much money do i lose by trading Osi as far as the salary cap goes? I still like Osi, If I were the GM i wouldn’t trade unless I’m getting a young player and a pick no lower than 3.. it’s not as if he’s washed up. He still has years left..why is everyone here so down on Osi? I may just love him because he was the only one who went to the pro bowl in 07 and he’s just getting off major surgery.

by GintzFan4life on Nov 30, 2009 1:28 PM EST reply actions  

Do some research

Take a look at Osi’s 2007 stats. Eliminate 1 game. The national TV game vs Eagles. Then look at his stats again. Tell me he deserved the Pro Bowl?

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

can't say that....

cuz he doesn’t play that game…the Giants D may get torched…if they lost that game…they end up 9-7, they don’t make the playoffs.

He won a game for the Giants basically, so yea…that one game earned Osi all his accolades that year.

Take away the other 15 games…Osi makes the Pro Bowl off that one game.

It wasn’t a fluke either cuz he was good in the playoffs too.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 4:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Playoffs?

He had zero sacks in 4 games. Osi had a good SB but was sackless. In the GB playoff game he was completely shut out. No Sacks. No tackles. The other 2 games he had 2 solo tackles in each game.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 8:13 PM EST up reply actions  

yea...

cuz anyone had a sack in teh GB game….

Osi got pressure throughout the playoffs, especially the SB. You’re fooling yourself if you didn’t think the Giants needed him in the playoffs.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I will admit

I often use PFF as a reference point. I was wrong about Osi in the playoffs. His grades in the playoffs were very good.

by FrankB0318 on Nov 30, 2009 10:47 PM EST up reply actions  

give me a break. tackles?

Tackles are a horrible way to judge how well a Dlineman is playing

by mclaren_is_the_best on Nov 30, 2009 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Eli..

He’s going to be inconsistent for the rest of his career. I wouldn’t have signed him to the 100 million dollar contract..unreal

by GintzFan4life on Nov 30, 2009 1:31 PM EST reply actions  

your wrong on that....

he’s got a pretty damn serious injury he’s been dealing with for weeks.

When he’s healthy..and the O-Line actually blocks for him, he earns that contract.

Everyone wants to compare him to Rivers….yet Rivers has 2 Plaxico’s and a Shockey…and all 3 are faster, better hands and shut their mouths in the huddle.

They need to retool the line. HAM, Nicks and Smith as they age will get better. Can’t forget this.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Eli

is posting the best numbers of his career. Injury or no injury. Inexperienced wide receivers, too. Offensive line that is starting to break down. I’d say the Giants should be thankful they have a guy as talented and resilient as Manning. He is a heckuva player, and if you don’t think so then I don’t think you will ever be happy with a Giant quarterback.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 30, 2009 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

?

wait what?

I didn’t say that.

Well…I said what you said…but I didn’t say I’m pissed at who are QB is. I wouldn’t trade him for damn near anyone.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Do you think coach C is to blame for playing guys like Clark and Blackburn or is it just that the Rookies haven’t been doing squat in practice/meetings?

by GintzFan4life on Nov 30, 2009 1:35 PM EST reply actions  

To me, it's simple

[note that Ed will disagree here]

Reese simply must leverage Coughlin to make some changes with the coordinators:

Gilbride – whether or not he is the sole reason the team has suddenly resembled the run’n’shoot Oilers of the early 90’s is debatable. What’s NOT debatable is that he is calling the Offensive plays and HE is the one the one that calls play variation A/B/C based on how the D looks. It’s his sole responsibility to keep Eli on a shorter leash in terms of audibiling into a pass. The Denver game was simply an abomination – the Gmen were in the game yet they never established the run. That’s on Gilbride.

Sheriden: this simply isn’t working. It’s time to admit that this was a bad decision and CUT BAIT. This is getting ridiculous now. Spags was clearly in an entirely different league than this guy and now the entire unit is paying the price. I’ll be ABSOLUTELY shocked if he is still the D coordinator in 2010.

by Cody K on Nov 30, 2009 1:46 PM EST reply actions  

bring Spags back…shouldn’t have let him go..on a positive note, manningham is a beast, sinorice should take a page out of his book. i would be lying if i said that i thought he’d be a factor, but he looks like an all pro

by GintzFan4life on Nov 30, 2009 1:52 PM EST reply actions  

can't bring him back....

he’s a head coach…..

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Bill Sheriden = Tim Lewis

His schemes are too passive and too much “read/react” which the players LOATHE.

In reality, this team needs SERIOUS talent upgrades at LB to compete.

by Cody K on Nov 30, 2009 2:01 PM EST reply actions  

i was just about to say that..looks like Tim Lewis is calling the D out there

by GintzFan4life on Nov 30, 2009 2:02 PM EST reply actions  

Not sure you can make wholesale changes at this point.

I would not mess with the WRs, they are doing fine. Jacobs needs to run straight and hard, and have a decent number of carries to assert himself. If the O-Line can’t clear a hole for him then he needs to go right over the top of the O-Line … that would be something to see. To do that either the negative influence needs to get out of Jacobs head, and I suspect that will be either the D Coord or the RB Coach (whoever that is), or Jacobs needs to get some therapy! Somehow he has to have a simpler more direct approach, IMHO. Of course, I could be talking absolute rubbish so correct me if I have this wrong. With a more productive running game to complement a satisfactory passing game we would have more time on the field going forward, less time on the field for the defense so they could be more rested, which seems to be what they need (apparently) … more rest and relaxation during the game .. please! That offensive production is also likely to help the confidence of the O-Line. So, my answer to Ed’s original question is inside Jacob’s head, I hope.

He was like a god walking amongst mere mortals. He had a voice that could make a wolverine purr and suits so fine they made Sinatra look like a hobo.

by Johannus on Nov 30, 2009 2:04 PM EST reply actions  

Sorry to reply to my own post (bad form) but this is how it went ...

TC: (to BJ at training camp) Look BJ, we have let the windy one go so you really have to step up because the second runner is a long way behind you and we have just broken our rookie. Are you up for that?
BJ: Yes, boss I can do that for you.
TC: Okay, good man. The key here is that you have to stay fit because without you we are screwed. Do you think you can do that for us BJ?
BJ: Yes boss .. (pause) .. but I keep getting injured!!
TC: Yes, we noticed that, so we want to you try running a different way so that you don’t get injured so much. Instead of running over the top of people we want you to try running around them.
BJ: Running around them, hmmm, that’s a novel idea. I had never thought of that before. Is it hard to do?
TC: Yes son, it might be hard for you, but we have a special ‘running around’ coach for you and we will get you some therapy to help you adjust.

Three months later … “run straight Brandon, for the love of everything that is good, run straight”.

He was like a god walking amongst mere mortals. He had a voice that could make a wolverine purr and suits so fine they made Sinatra look like a hobo.

by Johannus on Nov 30, 2009 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

i wish kenny phillips was out there, I can’t believe that Brown/Rouse replaced him. they should move Thomas to safety now that Ross is back..just a thought

by GintzFan4life on Nov 30, 2009 2:05 PM EST reply actions  

Jacobs

Unfortunately, there are many thoughts circulating that he is simply not running with the same intensity now that he got his contract. Last year, when angling for the bigger deal, he ran hard EVERY play. Now he seems content to run out of bounds and avoid the same contact he used to seek.

No longer can BJ be viewed as “the heart and soul of the offense”

by Cody K on Nov 30, 2009 2:10 PM EST reply actions  

Jacobs and Bradshaw together

Since everyone in the stadium knows Hedgecock rarely handles the ball defenses key on whoever lines up behind him. How about a backfield set up of both Jacobs and Bradsaw? This would keep teams off balance and add additional firepower to the offense. Jacobs certainly is big enough to play the fullback position once in awhile.
The question is will he?

by JoeBro on Nov 30, 2009 2:53 PM EST reply actions  

Maybe our offensive woes

will be over when we name Charlie Weis OC. Now we just need to find a DC.

by njgiant on Nov 30, 2009 3:00 PM EST reply actions  

Al Groh is available...

…time to reunite the coaching staff from the 1990 championship team!

by Step up and make big plays on Nov 30, 2009 11:43 PM EST up reply actions  

New Coordinators?

If you want another failed college coach, Al Groh was a DC under Parcells in NE.
However, at UVa, he proved to be a terrible gameday coach.

Mickey C

by Mickey C on Nov 30, 2009 4:45 PM EST reply actions  

But...

they both proved to be excellent coordinators which lead to head coaching positions. Excellent coordinators, less than average head coaches. Some guys were meant to coordinate while others were meant to coach. Obviously these two are better coordinators than coaches. Now bring on Charlie and Al and let’s get the season started!

by njgiant on Nov 30, 2009 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

be nice to get the old Giants regime

ties back. Groh from Parcells and Weis from Parcells/Belicheck.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Nothing can at this point.

"The Dallas Cowboys might be America's Team, but the New York Giants are America's DREAM team." -- Robert Tisch

by xMattex on Dec 1, 2009 10:08 AM EST up reply actions  

osi

I have to disagree with ur comments on osi. I do agree that he’s having a down year but I think its because this is his first year back from major knee surgery. An injury that big will take a season or so to get him back to where he was during the superbowl run. Also, given bill sheridans conservative playcalling as well as his inability to make adjustments during the game, that might contribute to his poor performamce

by Makaveli8751 on Nov 30, 2009 5:08 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

agree and disagree

Certainly you bring up some valid points, and there is obviously going to be disagreement with some of them. For me, I am disappointed with the defense more than the offense, because defense is big blue football. They are getting gouged through the air when it matters. The loss of Kenny Phillips has been tough to deal with, and Aaron Ross missing for the first few games was overlooked because of the lack of talent on their schedule. Now, with Pierce out, you have lost the two most important play-callers…Pierce for the LB/D-Line and Phillips for the secondary. That being said, there is nothing we can do about that but have the available players step up and do the job. CC Brown is not the answer, and Rouse may not be either. But who else is available? I like Blackburn, but he is not the answer for Pierce’s replacement. Maybe Goff should be considered, but let’s not try that until after the Cowboys and Eagles games. if they lose one, I am assuming that the season is lost. If that happens, sure, let’s try some of these younger players.

With regard to the offense, BJ needs twenty RUN plays. Every time they THROW him the ball, I puke a little in my mouth. He has concrete blocks for hands. get that play out of the playbook. BUT, when you give him twenty carries, even if it is for 65 yards, the other team starts to break down. How many yards did Derrick Ward have in the fourth quarter last year…lots I presume. I think the plan is to get Ramses barden in for the last five games, similar to what they did with Steve Smith…which worked out great. I say get him in there inside the twenty, along with Nicks and Smith. You figure out who to cover! Finally, I think the playcalling is predictable. It’s all about execution, the coaching staff will tell you. I agree partially. I also think that new plays will benefit the team. Not the wildcat, but new plays. my answer is obtaining the services of Charlie Weis as OC. Fresh ideas are welcome…

by BigBlue1156 on Nov 30, 2009 6:16 PM EST reply actions  

I agree with the sentiment, don't throw to Jacobs

I know that Eli can and that Jacobs has caught some, but he is our premier RB, that is what he does. I can’t remember him being a big catching threat in previous years. The question for me is “why would you need to throw to BJ?”. Is it because he has lost his running mojo, or to bring some variety and novelty into his game. Well, if we have time to throw there are more productive people to throw to (Ham, Smith, Nicks … not Hixon). Ahh, I get it. The next step is to get Hixon taking a few snaps as the running back (geez). It’s horses for courses, Ham, Smith and Nicks catch and run … Jacobs just has to run. If I want to see someone dance I am happy to watch Bradshaw do that.

He was like a god walking amongst mere mortals. He had a voice that could make a wolverine purr and suits so fine they made Sinatra look like a hobo.

by Johannus on Nov 30, 2009 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Get Vince Wilfork

if anyone’s watching the Pats-Saints game, that guys a monster.

Too bad we’ll never have any chance at offering him anything

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

by Willgfass on Nov 30, 2009 9:36 PM EST reply actions  

Brees - 17.6 yds per completion in the first half

Absolutely crazy.

He was like a god walking amongst mere mortals. He had a voice that could make a wolverine purr and suits so fine they made Sinatra look like a hobo.

by Johannus on Nov 30, 2009 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Amen

"The Dallas Cowboys might be America's Team, but the New York Giants are America's DREAM team." -- Robert Tisch

by xMattex on Dec 1, 2009 10:07 AM EST up reply actions  

My son supports the Saints

He keeps lamenting the fact that the Saints don’t have a running game. I don’t believe he really thinks that, he just says it to piss me off. I am happy that his team is doing so well, but every week is hard work for me with the Giants playing poorly and the damn Saints still undefeated. However, I still cannot back the Pats to win today. I think the Saints will manage what NE failed to do in ’07.

He was like a god walking amongst mere mortals. He had a voice that could make a wolverine purr and suits so fine they made Sinatra look like a hobo.

by Johannus on Nov 30, 2009 10:16 PM EST reply actions  

for real.

if they beat the Pats tonight (24-17 right now..) I can see them going undefeated

The only thing they’d be worried about is playing away from New Orleans, and the only 2 left on the schedule are Washington and Atlanta.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 30, 2009 10:32 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah, look out

dolphins are the only team that’s even been close. this team looks scarier than the ’07 pats.

by tulls200 on Nov 30, 2009 10:39 PM EST reply actions  

Nah

Its going to be colts-vikings.

The vikings team overall is better than the saints.

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

by Willgfass on Nov 30, 2009 11:00 PM EST reply actions  

that's assuming the giants don't make the playoffs

If they do, its obviously going to be a manning bowl

Never assume skill at bouncing a ball makes you smarter than the guy who built the court.

by Willgfass on Nov 30, 2009 11:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Well..

AP is all done for the year..Alot of you out here probably won’t care, but he was a force and inspirational leader on defense, plus he called the adjustments…

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 11:00 PM EST reply actions  

Bobbi is that a

switch, or does my memory deceive me in believing you launched one of your memorable screeds in his direction (nightclubbing with Plax, etc.)? Or maybe it’s just adhering to the notion that it’s unsavory to speak ill of the departed?

by blue gonz on Dec 1, 2009 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

George..

I may very well have backed off a bit on AP..So it is not necessarily a switch..but perhaps one could argue that I did..I guess I decided that having AP out on the field was better than nothing..Right now, our team has me dizzy…Normally when I say something I stick with it….It is a sports version of getting caught up in a vapor wash..I think they have a chance..I’m not going to give up.

by Bobbiblue on Dec 1, 2009 9:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Just pulling your chain a little Bobbi.

What you say about him is a mite over the top perhaps ( a force? inspirational?) but perhaps justifiable, pre 2008-2009. I’m sure many BBVers agree with your description. It seems to me he pretty much lost it in terms of physical play on the field in ’08 and declined further in ’09.
Caught up in vapor wash is a deft description for fans of a team in vapor lock.

by blue gonz on Dec 1, 2009 11:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't know about that one, Will..

The Saints are dominating the Patriots..They are no longer “the ain’ts”..and the Colts can only have so many miracle comebacks..I predict Viking versus Saints right now..Favre’s arm is back to being a rocket launcher, Brees is unflappable and both teams have great defense.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 30, 2009 11:05 PM EST reply actions  

You're right about Favre,
I honestly thought he'd have a great year IF his arm held up, although I really didn't think it would. Looks like he'll be playing a few more years at least.

by blue gonz on Dec 1, 2009 8:00 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't know if it would have made any difference

but I did want Eli to sit in the Oakland game. I think we could have won with Carr

Even so, the problem this year is on the line(s)

Dominant lines hide a multitude of sins – and the Giants lines are simply not dominant any more

by NYERinSF on Dec 1, 2009 1:11 AM EST reply actions  

solution for salvaging the season

How about win the next 5 games?
Did you read on ProFootballFocus that Kevin Boss was the #1 ranked Tight End?
The fact that the Giants had their best regular season in recent memory with osi on the sidelines should tell you something. The whole unit, however, looks old and unispired. I think we miss Jay Alford more than you might think.

by pataroons on Dec 1, 2009 6:22 PM EST reply actions  

Jacobs and Bradshaw

G Offense could be more unpredictable to
Dallas D by a split back formation wi/Jacobs
& Bradshaw in on the same play with Boss
and Manningham receiving.

by D Mac on Dec 1, 2009 8:04 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gravatar_image_3_small
My Worst Nightmare Part 2?
Blue_ridge_parkway_1st_set_008x_small
Dear Ed...Please make Underwear guy go away.
Weatherford_small
BBV Pick 'em SUPAH BOWL
Wolverenis_small
I have seen the future
Banksy_small
Pictures I shot of Giants Camp (August 2010)

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Clutch Illusion
Small
Let's do it one more time...
Small
Giants vs Patriots..."Give Calhoun the Ball!!!"
Small
The Book on Eli: The Mythological Narrative of the "Other Manning"
Small
TattooTramps Ode To The SuperBowl
Untitled_small
Falcons Fan Knew From The Start

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Get Your Giants' Gear

160x600_ny_giants_medium


Editor-In-Chief

Ed_valentine_2_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Small brisulph

Authors

Mike_farley_small Mike Farley

Meme2_small Sean Kerr