Big Blue View: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Can Tebow Say No To Anything?

The Giants are broken ... Now, how can they be fixed?

Philadelphia Eagles' LeSean McCoy (29) rushes past New York Giants' Aaron Rouse (26) in the second half during an NFL football game Sunday. This type of thing has been happening to the Giants defense on a regular basis.

Michael Perez - AP

Philadelphia Eagles' LeSean McCoy (29) rushes past New York Giants' Aaron Rouse (26) in the second half during an NFL football game Sunday. This type of thing has been happening to the Giants defense on a regular basis.

We spent Monday complaining about all of the things that have gone wrong with our long-ago 5-0 New York Giants. Today, let's turn the page and think about what Tom Coughlin and Co. can do fix some of the things that have gone wrong the past three weeks.

I am starting with this premise. The biggest problem on this football team -- without any doubt in my mind -- is the underwhelming defense. This team was built to dominate defensively while the offense found its way as the young group of wide receivers grew into its responsibilities.

There have been weeks when the offense has not played well, which he realistically had to expect entering the season. Or when various aspects of the special teams have not played well. The one constant, though, has been that against good teams the defense has been completely overmatched.

When we weren't talking about Plaxico Burress during the off-season, we were talking about the devastating defense we thought General Manager Jerry Reese had assembled. So far this season, the only things the defense is devastating is the Giants' chance to be a good football team.

In the last three weeks the Giants have given up 112 points (37.3 per game) and been riddled by too many huge plays for me to even think about. Forget being a dominant defense. Bill Sheridan's unit is not even close to being a competent one right now.

So, what can be done to improve the situation? I am going to break this down into four categories -- defensive line, linebackers, secondary and philosophy.

Star-divide

20080207093409990001_medium

via i391.photobucket.com

The defensive line

Remember back in the pre-season when we were wondering how defensive coordinator Bill Sheridan was going to find roster space -- and snaps -- for all the talented defensive linemen the Giants had collected?

Well, now the question is can anyone on that front four make a play?

The Giants are tied for seventh in the league with 18 sacks, but it is obvious that the front four cannot consistently pressure quarterbacks by itself -- which was the plan with this group. Osi is not the dominant force of yesteryear. Justin Tuck must still be nursing the Week 2 shoulder injury. Mathias Kiwanuka has been mostly a non-factor in recent weeks. The defensive tackles are non-existent in the pass rush.

The run defense has been horrible. Philadelphia ran for 180 yards, including 66 and 41-yard touchdown runs. Arizona, which is a bad running team, consistently got solid runs. New Orleans did what it wanted on the ground as well as in the air. All the way back to the Dallas game the run defense was a problem. In that game the Giants gave up runs of 56, 35 and 20 yards.

Way too often, running backs are hitting the second and third level of the Giants defense without being touched.

Fred Robbins and Barry Cofield are not holding up inside. Neither is Rocky Bernard, brought in from Seattle specifically to help the run defense. Jay Alford is gone for the year.

The solution? Inside I think all the Giants can hope for is that Chris Canty can make some plays if he ever comes back healthy. That is no guarantee, though, even if the Giants are paying him $42 million. He has never been a defensive tackle, and he has missed so much time there is no way of knowing how effective he can be. In all honesty, I have never been a big Cofield fan. As for Robbins and Bernard, I am wondering if both of these mammoth guys have just gotten old.

Outside, I think the only change the Giants can make is to start getting second-round pick Clint Sintim on the line in passing situations. Sintim and Osi at the ends, with Tuck and Kiwi at the tackles is the best pass-rush group the Giants can put on the field.

Other than that, all we can hope for is that Tuck and Umenyiora get healthier, and start making the plays they are being counted on to make.

Antoniopierce_medium

via i268.photobucket.com

The linebackers

Ah, the linebackers. Ugh! There isn't much nice to say here. Without the injured Michael Boley this is an un-athletic, un-inspiring, un-imposing group.

Danny Clark? Nice guy, great character, Tom Coughlin loves him and DC will do great things off the field once his playing days are done. On the field, though, Clark should not be a starting linebacker in the NFL. The guy is old, slow and hardly ever makes a play. Pretty much, he is just out there.

Chase Blackburn? Again, great character guy. Great special teams player. Smart, can play multiple positions and is a good tackler. But, slow, not and doesn't get off his blocks very well. Not a play-making, starting caliber linebacker.

Antonio Pierce? We knew he is smart. We know he is the 'quarterback' of the defense. We also know he is slow in pass coverage, not very imposing in the middle of the defense and has been getting abused by offenses for the past two seasons. Who do you think teams are running at over and over and over when they gash the Giants up the middle? Sorry, but AP's best football is clearly behind him.

CLINT SINTIM,2009 TRAINING CAMP,NFL,NY GIANTS

 

The solution? Clearly, some personnel changes are needed here. And this is an area of the defense where the Giants DO have some options. Those begin, again, with Sintim. I know the second-round pick from Virginia has clearly missed a lot of time on the practice field due to his leg injury earlier this season. He showed in the pre-season that he is an athlete, and a playmaker. It might be time to let Sintim learn on the field, replacing Clark. Sintim will make some mistakes, but he will also make some plays against the run simply with his athleticism. Against the pass? Put him at defensive end let him do what he does best -- get after quarterbacks.

On the other side, the Giants obviously miss Boley. In the couple of games he played before going down with a knee injury, he showed athleticism and cover skills the Giants have not had in an outside linebacker for a while. He will, of course, help when he returns. Until then? Sorry, Chase, but let's get Bryan Kehl on the field and see if he can help. Again, he is more athletic and maybe he can make a difference. Maybe he can't, but it's worth a shot to find out.

In the middle? The Giants are not moving Pierce out of there, as much as some of us might like them to. Blackburn is not the answer long-term in the middle, either. If the season spirals out of control (and Lord knows I am not wishing for that) I would like to see Jonathan Goff get a chance in the middle. He was impressive in pre-season and I want to know what he can do.

By the way, Clark, Blackburn and Gerris Wilkinson are free agents after this season. This group is headed for an off-season makeover.

The secondary

We have been over the issues with this group so many times I won't belabor them. The Giants miss Kenny Phillips so much I hate to even think about it. They miss Aaron Ross because at least he would provide them with some options. Have you noticed how often the Giants are playing 'nickel' with Michael Johnson, 'Bad, Bad C.C. Brown' and 'Just as Bad Aaron Rouse' on the field together? That's three safeties on the field in obvious passing situations -- none of whom can cover. A recipe for disaster.

There are no easy solutions here, though getting Ross back in some semblance of playing condition is probably the best the Giants can hope for. At least then in some of those passing situations they can get Brown off the field.

We would all love to see Brown get his pink slip. Yesterday. There is, truthfully, no help out there right now, however. If Reese could have done better than Rouse when KP went down he would have. But, teams don't jettison players mid-season without a good reason.

Maybe the Giants bring Sha'reef Rashad or Vince Anderson off the practice squad. It sure can't hurt, but it is no guarantee to help. Those guys are on the practice squad because the Giants didn't think they were ready to play at the NFL level yet.

Mostly, we just have to hope that Brown and Rouse learn from their mistakes, and get on the same page with the rest of the secondary. Oh, and that somebody back there remembers tackling is part of the job.

The philosophy

New defensive coordinator Bill Sheridan is under fire from every direction. Blitz more, Bill!. Don't blitz so much, Bill! How come your team can't play the run, Bill? Your guys can't cover, Bill! You can't carry Steve Spagnuolo's jock strap, Bill! Hey, Bill, we would have re-hired Tim Lewis or Johnnie Lynn if we wanted to watch this crap!

I have said it before -- I won't kill Sheridan over how much he blitzes or doesn't blitz. This team was built to pressure with four. It's not happening. They aren't getting home with the blitz, either. Because they just don't have the athletes.

That, really, is the crux of it. Right now the Giants simply don't have the athletes to be a dominant defense.

That said, it would be nice if Sheridan would remind his defensive backs that making a tackle once in a while would be nice.

Final word

I truly believe that better defense would solve a lot of the other problems the Giants are having. Inconsistent offense (which we expected entering the season), erratic special teams (which seems like a Giants trademark), the occasional incomprehensible Kevin Gilbride play call (yes, they do happen) would all be much less of an issue if the Giants could simply stop somebody once in a while.

We will see if Coughlin, Sheridan and Co. can figure out a way to make that happen. If they can't, the last eight games will be torture to watch.

0 recs  |  Comment 92 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Ridiculous number of things we could comment on this week (and all bad). I’ll focus on just a few, that maybe we can do something about:

1. CC Brown – another blown coverage on DJax wide-open TD. Can’t believe there is no-one on the roster who can do this better. Move TT to safety during bye week, and go with Dockery/Johnson at CB if Ross isn’t ready. This is JR’s one "Wet Willie", as it’s amazing we couldn’t come up with better plan in off-season or before trading dead line (hell, the Eagles, in a much more desperate situation, got Witherspoon for a # 5 an d a guy worse than Sinorice Moss !! – problem instantly solved.)

2. Special Teams – another bye week issue to address. Fire the special teams coach. This has been a bad unit for years, on both returns and coverage. Gotta be someone out there more competent. Would send a message that there will be consequences for failure. Unfortunately, you can’t fire Sheridan or Gilbride at this stage of the season.

3. Eli – no solution here. Just hope it’s not the heel causing all those horrid throws (and only "brain fasciitis" makes you throw it into the teeth of the coverage).

Was it just me, or on those first two possessions did it seem like the Eagles were in the Giants huddle. We finally bitzed, and they had perfect play called each time. On offense, they jumped almost every route our receivers ran. Can you say "out-coached" ?!?

by Shofner85 on Nov 3, 2009 7:08 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Risk taking

I have said it before.

More athelicism at LB – Boley is back. Play Kehl or Sintim instead of Clark.

How much worse can a first year safety be than Brown? I would cut him – he is that bad – and play Rouse or even better, one of the young guys off the practice squad (name eludes me).

Canty should help the DL but some creative ways to line up would not hurt. Play Kiwi more.

Fly to the ball !!! Make some plays!!! Take some chances!!!

by MSP Giant on Nov 3, 2009 7:23 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Great job, Ed

I’m down with all you say, although I think we should bench A P now and not wait until things get worse. I’m not sure we’d losing much if we lose his signal calling. He seems to be thinking too much out there

by blue gonz on Nov 3, 2009 7:42 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

George

I hear you on AP. I just realistically know it won’t happen.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 3, 2009 7:46 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, yeah, that's for sure. IMO, anything we lose

in intellect by benching him, we more than make up in physicality, playmaking, athleticism, etc.

by blue gonz on Nov 3, 2009 8:06 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Really?

I don’t this guy’s head has been in the game since the Super Bowl. Just look at his gut, lack of hustle, and so on. If he was intelligent he would train in the off season and make a tackle or two. I haven’t been able to stand the guy since the Latin Quarter. Any captain or defensive leader needs to be more accountable. He’s a joke.

Jerry,
Please cut Antonio Pierce.
Thanks,
DB

by DukBudr on Nov 3, 2009 8:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

AP...

… is still smart. Remember the pick six by Bruce Johnson in the Dallas game? That was because Pierce read the offense and made the adjustment.

by RolloT on Nov 3, 2009 10:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Questions

Ed

I have not seen the games so can anyone tell me.

1. Has the playcalling on offence changed since the Raiders game – are we attempting more downfield throws whilst the game is still in the first half?

2. I know we rotate the DL – do Clark and Chase get rotated at all other than on passing downs?

3. Do the coaches have the courage to make decisons like benching players or do you only move up when injuries occur. I mention this as the reason quoted for not using rookies etc is that they make mistakes – but at what point do they give up on an underperforming player?

by G Fan in England on Nov 3, 2009 8:13 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

G Fan

Here are my thoughts.

1. I still think there are too many downfield throws, though some of that is route adjustments and audibles. Of course, I might think differently if Eli was connecting on more of them. Sunday, for example, he missed a wide open Sinorice Moss in the end zone.

2. Yes, there is a rotation with the linebackers. In passing situations the linebackers are often taken out.

3. Well, the problem there is who do you put in? In some areas the Giants have no real options. It will be interesting to see how TC handles what has been going on.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 3, 2009 8:22 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

Sometimes you have to gamble on a young player – other teams do – unless of course the players we have are not good enough which then comes back to drafting and FA and not covering the safety position well enough.

However, can they be any worse than CC….

by G Fan in England on Nov 3, 2009 8:55 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Moss shouldn't even be on the team anymore

Shortest guy on the team, if he was an inch taller he would have made that catch. A good receiver should be there (Nicks/Smith, even hixon)

Why’d we see so much Hagan anyways?

Not giving up on the G-Men until we're mathematically out of the Playoff race.
Big Blue forever!

by Willgfass on Nov 3, 2009 1:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

U got it Right........

It seems that the coaching staff is adverse to benching players and giving young players opportunities, unless there is an injury or you are a 1st rd pick ie;………Bradshaw, Boss and Micheal Johnson,didnt see the field until there were significant injuries………..And I dont believe we win the SB,without those rookie contributions!

by giantsbizzybody1 on Nov 3, 2009 10:19 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

They only gamble on players when they are desperate it seems

like in 07,

Madison got hurt and they were so thin at CB they gave Corey Webster a shot in the playoffs and if you remember at the time CWeb looked like he was going to be a bust but they took a shot becasue they had no other options and he developed into a solid player in that playoff run.

Ward broke his leg so Bradshaw got his chance.

Shockey went down, in came Boss and Steve Smith, who emerged as big part of their SB run becasue they started going 3 WR’s with Smitty in the slot. I’m telling you they don’t win that year if Shockey is healthy. Smith playing really helped that O and gave them a different look.

by Landeta on Nov 3, 2009 10:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

giantsbizzybody1

I did not see your post, I repeated what you said, sorry.

by Landeta on Nov 3, 2009 10:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One problem though

is I dont think the Giants have any rookies or young players on the team that can help at saftey or D-Tackle. At LB YES! If Clark and Blackburn are not long term solutions than why not play the younger guys like Kehl, Sintim, and Wilkinson. I’d rather get beat up and see what we have and hope that maybe a guy devlops like C-Web did in 07. Wilkinson is now where C-Web was in 07, a wasted pick that will not be with the team next year. I’m not saying he’s going to develop into a great player but Clark and Chase have no more upside potential Wilkinson at least might. Play him a bit see what he has.

by Landeta on Nov 3, 2009 10:33 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: One Problem Though

They don’t have any rookies, however If and when Ross comes back Either Terrell Thomas or Ross needs to move to saftey. Because CC and Rause stink!!! They are not going to get any better. Another observation from Sunday how come the Eagles are picking up their back up defensive backs from the Patriots and we are getting ours from the Texans. I just don’t understand how Jerry looked at CC’s game tape and decided to sign him even for a back up. This guy is not NFL quality at all. These guys including Michael Johnson are making me miss Gabril and J. Butler Bad!

by Late for Dinner on Nov 3, 2009 11:51 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the mythical 5-1-5

that we haven’t seen could provide some relief? 5 linemen may see better QB pressure, 1 LB could assure we have no crummy guys out there… the only problem is fielding the nickel but obviously that’s already a sore spot!

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 3, 2009 8:23 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Great break down Ed

And you are absolutely right that its the D that needs fixing. IMO the running game is being handicapped by the D. Anyway, I agree with the sentiment from several people that its time to get younger & more athletic.

by potroast on Nov 3, 2009 8:37 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Despit ethe woes of Brown and the inadequate secondary

what’s been killing us is our crappy run defense.

The goal of the Giants defense is to stop the run, and force the pass. When a fullback runs 40 yards for a touchdown, than of course our defense is going to fail.

That’s why we need canty back. Canty occupies guys, and has a huge wingspan. Hopefully he’ll at least help clog the holes.
Boley is a play maker so he’ll help with the run d also.

If we can stop the run, than we can at least know they’ll be only passing.

Not giving up on the G-Men until we're mathematically out of the Playoff race.
Big Blue forever!

by Willgfass on Nov 3, 2009 1:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As for good news

Both Boley and Canty are going to practice tomorrow.

by potroast on Nov 3, 2009 8:48 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Good news,

although they might be availabe for spot duty only. Better something than nothing.

by blue gonz on Nov 3, 2009 8:50 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed

They aren’t going to just jump into starting roles, but at least they are coming back finally..that is good news..They’ll make an impact on the second half of the season.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 3, 2009 10:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree -- and have felt the same way since August

- This is an unathletic, uninspired team that believed in its own hype - from top to bottom. Watching replays of other games on NFL network — middling teams like the 49ers are playing watchable football, playing with heart and fire, win or lose, while the Giants seem to be saying — “but this can’t happen to us, we’re the NY Giants, wah, wah, wah!” Beat the Chargers or put the season to bed. If they can’t find a way to defeat their next opponent — a middling team — then the BYE will solve nothing. The season will be lost, lots of heads will be scratched, and maybe next year fans will enter the new season with more scepticism and a better eye towards picking out what were, this year at least, easily seen flaws…

by ZILLAG on Nov 3, 2009 8:53 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Yes that could

have something to do with it..reading about how great you are and getting all full of yourself…Bill Cosby: “Daddy’s Great!..He gave us the Chocolate Cake!!”

by Bobbiblue on Nov 3, 2009 10:26 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

you make good points...

yet I just can’t take you seriously when you mention “August”.

DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 3, 2009 12:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not going to apologize for being optimistic going into the season

Especially looking at the results of last season combined with the draft and offseason moves. Again I ask, why you seem to be so fixated on proving that you called a disaster in the preseason? Will it make you feel better if they prove you right or prove you wrong? I apologize if I sound critical, but you are the exact opposite of Terry over at BWTB.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Nov 3, 2009 9:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rodney Harrison is out there

He may be a dirty player, but he does know the game and can help us short term. He’s on the scrap heap and can be had for nothing. I’d at least give him a look if I’m Reese.

by MJ20 on Nov 3, 2009 9:01 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

if he was applauded when first announced

he wouldn’t know if it was mocking

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 3, 2009 10:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Coaching and gameplans

Everyone raved about the Steelers defence last year and their DC was the best in the league.

Well even he got outsmarted on Fitzgerald’s 62 yard TD.

You watch the play and marvel how the coach draw it up – both inside WR’s run hooks attracting the two deep safeties whilst Larry ran a slant, caught the ball and ran down the middle of the field virtually untouched.

We just do not see that type of adjustment on our offence.

If we do not make the playoffs it will be interesting to see who TC cans!

by G Fan in England on Nov 3, 2009 9:02 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

+100000
That goes back to what??? Coaching!

by lboogie25 on Nov 3, 2009 9:36 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Enough is enough, this is a business and changes have to be made

   What employer would have their main production line turn out a poor product? It’s hard to imagine that a company would continue to operate at this level with no personnel changes! It’s really too easy to identify the problem areas, but i guess it’s even harder to make the changes, why, i don’t know? Are we afraid of hurting ones feelings over poor production? If so, theres always the unemployment line because of the lack of courage to make changes, when it’s apparent that they are needed!

   So for better or for worse, it really can’t get any worse. At the very least, i identified two problem areas that i would instantly change. If Clint Sintim is healty, you are now starting, point blank! Danny Clark comes to work, and some wonder if he has called in because know one see’s him!

   Attention Sha’reef Rashad or Vince Anderson, there is a great opportunity for either of you to let yourself be known. As young an unproven workers at this level, we understand there may be a few mistakes, but the former worker was too one dimensional and whatever you guys bring, can’t be any worse, but presumably better!

   These changes may have an ounce of desperation, but if we stay this course, it can only get worse. Then you ask yourself, back when we had the chance, what if we only…

by Hootman on Nov 3, 2009 9:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, I did too. Not sure what’s going on, but the SN sites have a nit of a different look today so maybe it has something to do with that.

by potroast on Nov 3, 2009 9:20 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Sites

A few tweaks were made to the site designs today. If you guys are experiencing problems at all, e-mail me at bigblueview@gmail.com. I will forward any issues to our support team.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 3, 2009 9:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree Hoot

Bring Rashad and Anderson up..How worse could it be than what we have now?..Yes they’ll make mistakes but that is what we are already seeing…at least they’ll learn fast..I swear the reason Webster got turned around was because he is trying to cover the whole darn field by himself..Consantly looking around to see what the other boobs are doing out there with him.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 3, 2009 10:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well, i'm to the point of being more PO'd, than in a state of shock

   The shock has worn off and has transformed into, WTF??? Just reading either TC or Eli’s transcripts of late, it’s the same BS. No shyte, you guy’s have to execute better, you guy’s have to do things differently blah, blah, blah etc… Truth remains, nothing has changed and the last three weeks has been carbon copied!

   Oh, and this really bothers me. I’m surprised know one has brought this up. When Tynes was having issues etc… we brought in K’s. Why, because there were problems. And now, holy shyte, watch the film, there are problems galore. You mean to tell me that there’s not enough visual evidence to suggest that Clark and CC are NOT, problems?

   This is gross negligence and i think that is a crime!

by Hootman on Nov 3, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hahaha!!!

I mentioned yesterday my frustration with Eli’s interviews..I am sick of the same old crap..His and Coughlins..“We need to execute better, my foot is fine we need to play better football we’re making mistakes”..Well TC and Eli…Hello?????..No kidding?..If it weren’t for me watching football for 48 years I might very well have bitten off on the bullcrap..stop BS-ing us and do something about it…otherwise, just record the post-game interview that you give week in and week out and simply play it back every week..You will have more family time..You don’t even have to change the name of the team you got whipped by..We can figure that out…So just replay the usual BS..and Here’s a suggestion…TC, why not just have the players bring blankets to the field..instead of pre-game warm-ups they can have “Nap time”..That may go along ways towards preventing them from falling asleep during the game!!..Think about it could be the answer your looking for!!

by Bobbiblue on Nov 3, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re Hahaha!!!

Eli is Eli is is always going to give you a generic answer wheather things are good or bad. What I want from TC is some Fire and Brimstone. This team needs a kick in the you know what.

by Late for Dinner on Nov 3, 2009 11:45 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

About Tuck

I don’t know if anyone else mentioned this but I do think part of the problem with him is they can’t move him inside on passing downs becasue of his injury. If you saw the past two weeks Kiwi was inside on some passing downs. So I don’t think brining in Sintim on line and putting Tuck inside is an option right now.

by Landeta on Nov 3, 2009 9:08 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Bad Game Planning

Against the Eagles……..Did anyone recognize that on the TD pass To Jackson, this Sheridan(disguised as a NFL DC)had his 2 best rushes drop back into coverage,sent only 4 and Danny Clark was one of them……this is the same Clark that hadn’t recorded a sack b4 last week in over 3yrs………this has been his(sheridan) MO,against the Saintsno blitzing, yet we draft a LB (Sintim)in the 2nd rd to just that!It appears to b total incompetence…………Offensively,why hasnt Ramses Barden seen the field yet,but we seem to continue to put Moss out there,do we have to hope for an injury to notice the talent sitting in front them, something like the 07 Super Bowl team!…………….Reese has given these guys the tools and they just aren’t handy!

by giantsbizzybody1 on Nov 3, 2009 10:28 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree Land...

and another problem is Osi..he is over running the plays the last three weeks.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 3, 2009 10:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Osi

wants sacks for that new contract — he was more upset that he got his TD overturned than the team giving up forty — or maybe when he walked out on Bill during meetings in the preseason he never really came back and doesn’t want to play for him

by Tom_and_Jerry on Nov 3, 2009 4:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Bill Sheridan

maybe i just haven’t noticed but when i see the defense running around looking lost and they cut to Sheridan on the side lines it seems like he just stands there with his clip board with no emotions. One of my favorite things about Spags was his emotion and intesity and scrambling to get players in and out, mixing things up and even shouting on the field as the other team is lining up. I loved watching that and it really seemed like the players responded to that. To me it seemed that Spags was the true “qb” of the defense and AP was just benefiting from his intellegence. I always thought the team should have payed what ever Spags wants and promise him the throne to the giants and let TC go in a few years. Just a thought

by NotABillsWesternNY on Nov 3, 2009 9:24 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Disagree a bit emotions of coaches and players

In my opinion this is a product of the media becasue it’s good fooder. Here are two good examples of what I mean; When Eli struggles and has the dear-in-the head lights look, it’s he does not play with emotion, he’s not a leader, and looks totally confused out there. When he has the same dear-in-the head lights looks and wins, it’s he’s so cool and in control and has the perfect personlaity to deal with playing in NY and in big games. He’s Easy E when he’s playing well and they are winning then he’s a country bumkin when he’s loosing. Same thing with Bill Bellicheck. In Clevland he was this distant, cold personality that could not relate to players yet in NE he’s a cool an calculating Genius. Same guy different results. My point is this gets a bit overblown, if the D was playing lights out the talk would be about how smart and calm SHeridan is and how thats helped them succeed.

I’m not saying your wrong about Sheridan, there may be some issues scheme wise or player relation wise as to why they are struggling but I don’t think we can make that determination just by looking at his sideline personality.

by Landeta on Nov 3, 2009 9:50 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know if I agree with you on this one Land..

Eli is confused because he is not bluffing defenses, they are bluffing him unlike his brother..and the DC needs to be a firey SOB on the sideline..Coughlin needs to have a “Come to Jesus meeting” and let the coaching staff and players know that they better do their jobs or they will be bending over and kissing their asses goodbye..Parcells did that..Coughlin needs to revert back somewhat from his “New Mellow” approach and start kicking some butt.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 3, 2009 11:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yes

I mentioned the very same thing yesterday..Spags was a firey cheerleader on the sidelines..So was John Fox..Sheridan is a Mummy..He couldn’t fire up a barbecue grill.

by Bobbiblue on Nov 3, 2009 10:41 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Sheridan

We have seen this movie before only it’s title was Tim Lewis’s Defense. Sheridan is in over his head and every week he is getting exposed.

by Late for Dinner on Nov 3, 2009 11:39 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think if they could find a way to sure up the run D

they can build off that. I’ve said it before when teams run on you like that it puts the D on it’s heels for the entire game because the D-Ends cant pin their ears back as much and rush while the safteys have to respect and commit to the run so they are vunerable in pass coverage (not that CC an cover). I think it’s a big reason why the GIants have the worst red-zone defense in the league. Teams get in close and have the option of either running or passing and it keeps the D off balance. If you could shut down the running game it makes the other team one dimesnsional and makes the pass rush better which in turns makes the secondary play better even if your safteys stink. Sure the Giants are going to give up big plays this year becasue of the lack of KP, we all knew in the preseason if he got hurt we were screwed with CC, but if they could start stuffing the run teams would be much more limited and predictable in their playcalling (Look at the current state of the Giants O) which to me is why this D looks so confused all the time. Think about it if your an O cordinator you could call just about any play, run, pass, draw, screen, delayed handoffs, playaction, fake FG and it’ll prbabbly work in the Red Zone vs the Giants. Look this won’t be a dominate D this year but if you could stop the run other aspects of the D will improve, and this could be a bend but don’t break type of D. The big plays will be a weaknees because we are not getting a quality saftey until 2010 but if you sure up the run D teams won’t score as mant TD’s in the Red-Zone and it will keep our O in the game a bit more.

by Landeta on Nov 3, 2009 9:35 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Pretty much exactly what I was thinking and said a few times

You just said it better

Not giving up on the G-Men until we're mathematically out of the Playoff race.
Big Blue forever!

by Willgfass on Nov 3, 2009 1:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like these plans. Especially regarding Smith and the passing game. I wish Eli would adapt to a two minute offense. You can see the guy has stuff going through his head when the play is about to start, yet with only seconds left to snap, he can’t utilize all of it.

by RolloT on Nov 3, 2009 11:05 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Beckum was in the first int play

Part of it was Eli, part of it was on beckum. Awful route running oon that play

Osi’s back, its been more than him. Taking him out won’t do anything more than piss him off. Seeing that he was really the only one on D to show up yesterday, i wouldn’t do that

Not giving up on the G-Men until we're mathematically out of the Playoff race.
Big Blue forever!

by Willgfass on Nov 3, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Like every suggestion,

Particularly 4 & 5, because:
1.I forgot about TT playing S in college. Much better choice than Ross.
2. Osi’s obssession with go9ing up field has really hurt us on running plays.

by blue gonz on Nov 3, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

all of a sudden Osi can't play the run

we weren’t complaining 2 seasons ago when he was smacking QBs left and right. our run D didn’t seem to suffer then.

Osi doesn’t fly up the field every play. that is a myth.

by wilddre22 on Nov 3, 2009 11:55 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Can't play the run

It’s more that opposing D’s have figured out how to turn his strength into a weakness. If he tweaks his approach, he’ll be okay. No, he doesn’t fly up the field every play, but other teams run his way a lot and flying up the field has too often led to big gains on cutbacks by opposing RBs. No one had denied his athleticism.

by blue gonz on Nov 4, 2009 9:04 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

actually...

the idea that the Giants can’t play the run is not Osi’s fault…he’s not doing all that much different than he’s ever done.

Its the fact that Justin Tuck is injured and not getting to teh QB from the other side (Osi was never good on his own…Michael Strahan..I need not explain further).

Also, its the fact that the LB’s in 2007 were much better. Kawika Mitchell was as slow as any of these guys…but he had DE strength. He was a good run stopper, could rush the passer and was very smart. They miss that sort of LB on one side of Pierce. Mitchell was a MLB before too, so I’m sure he bounced plenty of ideas off Mitchell.

Also…the other LB was Mathias Kiwinauka. He’s a large person too. Those are good for stoping the run.

That’s why they aren’t as good. Not Sheridan. Not necessarily the secondary either (tho CC Brown sucks and they all seemed incapable of tackling against Philly).

They had Kiwi and Mitchell on the outside of Pierce (and on nickel 3rd downs…Kiwi on the line with as part of the 4 Horsemen).

Believe it. Our cavalry will arrive with a large person in Canty. A fast pass LB in Boley, who can be that Kawika Mitchell like presence…except a LOT faster, Aaron Ross can help get guys like TT off the field merely for a breather, also he’s gonn help on nickel downs as hes’ a good tackler.

Also, as the season progresses I’d like to hope the coaching staff is instilling a clue in Clint Sintim.

From what I saw of Sintim, if you made them each the same number, he could pass for Kiwinauka.

SO??? There’s you LB crew of 2007, the underrated crew they are at that. Sintim being Kiwi…Boley being Mitchell.

This season aint over. The cavalry WILL arrive.

DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 4, 2009 3:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and I know that Kiwi was out for most of the 2nd half and the playoff run

yet, Reggie Torbor is also better than the 2 OLB’s the Giants have right now (never thought I’d say that….).

DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 4, 2009 3:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

wow...

I’ve been trying to say that in about 95 posts….

DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 3, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with 2, and5-11.

For 1 and 3, Johnson was on Celek on the second TD, completely lost him and was trailing three yards behind. On a play inside the 20, he was three yards behind. I don’t believe he can cover an elite TE straight up. I also don’t know if I’m ready to weaken our corner position by moving guys around. If the corners can solidly cover, than the safeties’ help assignments are infin itely easier.

Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!

by bigbluethruandthru on Nov 3, 2009 9:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Get rid of Brown and Rouse

And bring Rashad and Anderson. They can’t play any worse than Brown and Rouse are. They’re young and fast and maybe that speed will help.

by John W on Nov 3, 2009 10:03 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Bad Game Planning

Against the Eagles……..Did anyone recognize that on the TD pass To Jackson, this Sheridan(disguised as a NFL DC)had his 2 best rushes drop back into coverage,sent only 4 and Danny Clark was one of them……this is the same Clark that hadn’t recorded a sack b4 last week in over 3yrs………this has been his(sheridan) MO,against the Saintsno blitzing, yet we draft a LB (Sintim)in the 2nd rd to just that!It appears to b total incompetence…………Offensively,why hasnt Ramses Barden seen the field yet,but we seem to continue to put Moss out there,do we have to hope for an injury to notice the talent sitting in front them, something like the 07 Super Bowl team! It seems that the coaching staff is adverse to benching players and giving young players opportunities, unless there is an injury or you are a 1st rd pick ie;………Bradshaw, Boss and Micheal Johnson,didnt see the field until there were significant injuries………..And I dont believe we win the SB,without those rookie contributions!…………….Reese has given these guys the tools and they just aren’t handy!

by giantsbizzybody1 on Nov 3, 2009 10:33 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Before we go killing Sheridan for dropping Osi and Tuck, Spags did it last year as well. At the same time, Sheridan did say in the pre-season, we wouldn’t see any of that stuff. Perhaps he’s trying to call familiar packages to get the guys on track. Just playing Devil’s advocate here. I do believe you dance with the girl you brought and should have our best rushers doing exactly that.. rushing the QB.

by lboogie25 on Nov 3, 2009 11:31 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

TC hates to play rookies, because he hates mistakes so much

He’s shown his flexibility with handling players. He has a chance now to show he can be flexible with rules he imposes on himself. Sure, mistakes will be made, but playing the young athletic guys will make us a better team. Too much thinking, not enough instinctual play. Some young guys should replace starters who need to be benched; others should be givwn as much playing as feasible, practicable, etc.

by blue gonz on Nov 3, 2009 4:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Too much thinking, not enough instinctual play

Exactly. That is the definition of ‘read and react’ defense, which is not what Bill Sheridan was supposed to be bringing. That, however, is his personality.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 3, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

he hates mistakes so much....

yet…well you know who’s starting….

DO WHAT JERRY HAIRSTON DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 3, 2009 5:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well a rare defense of Moss..

He was wide open for an obvious TD but Eli sailed the ball way over his head..and yes I have been clamouring for Barden all season..We have players on the field that should be on the practice squad and players on the practice squad that should be on the field..What’s up with that?

by Bobbiblue on Nov 3, 2009 10:49 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah but sinorice didn't make any type of play for that ball

Just saw it wasn’t going right at him and didn’t even care

Not giving up on the G-Men until we're mathematically out of the Playoff race.
Big Blue forever!

by Willgfass on Nov 3, 2009 1:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

So many problems

But Ed makes some great points:

1. DTs haven’t done anything this year. We used to be able to count on them to get a pressure on the QB and that hasn’t happened this year.

2. I’d love to see Sintim get playing time. We are playing with slow, unathletic LBs. The coaching staff can be stubborn towards young players (i.e. – Butler playing over KP last year), lets hope that ends.

3a. Sheridan has to be the biggest problem. He is the coordinator. He needs to make sure that his players know where they need to be in every situation. Our players are constantly out of position and confused. C.C. Brown plays 40 yards deep on 3rd and 10 and they just throw it right in front of him. Sheridan needs to see this on film and correct him. I can’t stand C.C. Brown, but he has not gotten coached up at all.

3b. Another reason that I believe Sheridan is the problem is because this was an unathletic defensive team last year, but Spags was able to make our D look good. We still had Clark, Pierce, and Blackburn last year. They didn’t suddenly get that much slower. They just aren’t being put in the right positions to succeed. There are a lot of great coordinators out there that can do so much more with less. Sheridan needs to find ways to hide weaknesses on this team.

by ggggmen08 on Nov 3, 2009 10:56 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I know what your saying about CC and being coached up

But as it stands, theres no noticeable improvement. Simply put, he cannot cover. His presence on the field jeopardizes the whole unit. The unit can’t continue to play a certain D so they have to baby sit CC and make sure he doesn’t get burned. If anything, opposing O’s can pretty much do anything they want, all because of CC!

by Hootman on Nov 3, 2009 11:44 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

RE :CC

CC has got to sit down, other teams are going right at him in the passing game. I’ll bet you the Chargers run the same rounte he got beat on by D. Jackson for the touchdown.

by Late for Dinner on Nov 3, 2009 11:57 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree with pts 1 and 2

Not giving up on the G-Men until we're mathematically out of the Playoff race.
Big Blue forever!

by Willgfass on Nov 3, 2009 1:53 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Rookies

Lots of talk about bringing in the rookies, and I’m starting to wonder, why not? Really C.C. Brown is awful. I can’t believe that even an overwhelmed rookie wouldn’t be able to put up the same workload as Brown. Honestly, what’s the draw to Brown? His hitting ability? Its so rare he’s anywhere near someone to tackle that we don’t see that ability of his. Personally I would try giving Anderson or Rashad a chance. Ed, didn’t you do a piece in the preseason about how Anderson really wanted a chance to prove himself? At this point, we should to give it to him. Realistically, there’s nothing we can do about Brown to improve our season. He’s now a target for offenses. I know rookies aren’t a very safe option, and it could wind up worse than Brown, but how much better does our season look with Brown starting?

As for bringing Barden in, I’m now somewhat skeptical of the kid. The talk all preseason was how he could go up into the air and bring down the ball against two or three DBs, but if he’s doing that against our DBs then what does that prove? I’m more curious about Ware. Has he been used at all the previous few weeks? With Bradshaw’s playing time about to become very limited, we’re going to need him.

by RolloT on Nov 3, 2009 11:02 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Bill Sheridan

I agree with the thoughts on D however it’s time to start putting the blame on Sheridan for this horrible D we have. All of the changes Ed V has suggested should already be in the works because Shridan should be looking at doing some new things you know adjusting to the realty on the ground. On Sunday if I see the same old players and the same old game plan I am gonna scream even louder for Shridan to be fired at the end of the year. I love Jerry Reese but when you have a now team you don’t hand over the defense to a rookie coordinator!

by Late for Dinner on Nov 3, 2009 11:25 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Kevin Gilbride time to go!

I know that he can’t make the catches or the reads on the field, but before you defend Gilbride again ask yourself these questions. Is our offense a power run team or a pass team? How come the only quick pass our offense seems to have is the bubble screen. When is the last time Gilbride has suprised a defense with new wrinkles during a game. The Giants fool nobody on offense the defense already knows what play is coming before the snap is that all on Eli or does the O Coordinator have to take more blame for a generic game plane. Yes Gilbride is a good coach, however his play calling is terrible and predictable. For god sake’s Defenses have been playing us the same for a year now and he still has not figured out how to make the pay for putting 8 men in the box. We need to up grade!

by Late for Dinner on Nov 3, 2009 11:32 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Absolutely. I put most of the blame on the late season offensive swoon on Gilbride. 6 weeks is enough time to adjust to have a competent offense. He failed miserably last year. This guy had Ryan Leaf with the Chargers and Kordell Stewart with the Steelers.. some QB guru he is.

by lboogie25 on Nov 3, 2009 11:35 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

One thing, though

I think it’s hard to judge the offense right now. It is being put in a position where the defense can’t stop anybody, and KG, Eli and everyone else knows it.
Some things KG does are questionable, but when plays are there and the QB misses it, the receiver drops it or runs the wrong route that’s not on him.
Granted, I would like to see him reach a little deeper into the playbook sometimes.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 3, 2009 1:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Judging Gilbride

Ed, I start this off by saying you probably have forgotten more football than I know, But it’s time to call a spade a spade. KG does a really good job of getting players ready to play and step into their roll, his play calling…. let me put it this way KG eigther has his A game or his F Game going, their is no in between. Sure he is not the only thing wrong with our offense but I don’t see any second half adjustments out of him. and Basically since Plax has been gone defenses have been loading up the box to stop our run game. One year later our offense still looks like it has zero answers for 8 men in the box. I don;t think KG is the worst OC out there but I do think we need to upgrade the offensive Coordinator position, just like the players if a coach is not what he used to be we need to look for a new answer.

by Late for Dinner on Nov 3, 2009 1:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Thing is

Debate KG all you want, the difference in this team this year is the really, really poor defense. KG is no different than he has ever been. The offense, really, with the Giants has been inconsistent my entire life. Good Giants teams have always had dominant defenses. This one does not have one.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 3, 2009 2:02 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

KG, Defense, speical teams take your pick

No question the Defense is the number one problem and don’t get me going on Sheridan! However we all might have to face the facts that with the current injury situation and a rookie D Coordinator our D just might not be up to the challenge this year. I love Jerry but he has got to take a hit for the depth (or lack there of) at the safety position. The reason I stay on KG is because I know he can be better than what we are seeing out of him. I been a Giant Fan 29 years, and yes our teams win because of defense but ,whenever we have been an upper echolon team our offense has been pretty good with the ball control, We need our offense to carry more weight right now at least till guys get healthy. As bad as our D has been our O is doing them no favors the last 2 games bad turnovers putting the D on a short field is not helping. One last thing, I am not calling on KG or Sheridan to be fired during the season, just hopging that we try and upgrade both coaching positions in the off season.

by Late for Dinner on Nov 3, 2009 2:58 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If i had to pick out of this three pronged mess, the defense would be first to clean up!

The defense can set the tone for what lacks in the offense or on special teams. If it’s an offensive sub-par day, then let the D create stops, TO’s and generate field position. Same goes with ST’s, if given a shorter field to work with, at least knowing a strong D is present, it gives you an opportunity to stay in the game.

I’m only basing this out of my own opinion, but it seems logical. The Giants have had this simplistic blueprint for years (some of them). An average O, a suspect ST and a strong D! It just so happens that everything has fallen apart, well almost, at once!

Regardless of injuries, this D has to have some kind of resemblance of competitiveness, fire or whatever. This soley falls onto Sheridan. Whatever has been said or done, has not worked. It’s time for change, or it could be a change that may cost ones career!

by Hootman on Nov 3, 2009 3:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

My problem with KG

My problem with KG is his inability to react during the game. This was glaring last year in the playoffs. It was clear in the 1st qtr that Eli was not throwing the ball well. Who knows why, but the gameplan was to try to hit a long one early, and Eli wasn’t getting it done. At that point, they needed to call some short passes and try to get Eli hot, but it just didn’t happen.

Last Sunday, Eli was horribly off, clearly unable or unwilling to step into his passes. At this point there was no adjustment.

But this is who he is, and it isn’t going to change. Firing him now doesn’t make any sense though. Quite simply, if the D continues playing at its current level, the season is over. So while I really disagree with how the Offensive playcalling is being done, the only way to get the wheels back on this bus is to get the Defense to start forcing some turnovers.

by Wide_right on Nov 3, 2009 2:42 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

e-mail, blogging, etc

have provided an environment that promotes typos, grammatical errors, etc. People are always apologizing for them. As long as sense can be made of the message, I say leave it alone. Another area where technology has provided an environment that encourages rank growth is the loathsome troll. I say don’t encourage them by responding to them (okay, maybe, occasionally a one sentence barb, but no more than that—life’s too short.)

by blue gonz on Nov 3, 2009 4:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Agreed, George

When the trolls show up — as they inevitably will — leave them alone. That is the best punishment, since they are only here looking for a fight.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 3, 2009 5:31 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well I agree to an extent, Ed

If one shows up and ridicules me I would ignore it..but I felt compelled to jump that one guy yesterday, because he was insulting blue gonz..Obviously you have removed that thread, but I felt it was something I had to do to shut him down. I go to other team blogs but never ever have I been beligerant or critical..only for thoughts on the opponents feelings on an upcoming game…and I hope there are no BBV-ers out here that act like “Trolls” on other team sites..We need to maintain class..George has the right attitude..When you boil off all the fat, this is just a game win or lose, it inspires us all and we are lucky to have the opportunity to root for them..In a sense, our sports tie us all together and builds a bond amoungst all of us everywhere in the Country..that is the way it should be…Sure we have our fair share of nit-wits in the U.S. but just drunks fist-fighting. In other Countries people get killed rooting for sports..Soccer comes to mind..People get dead..In Baghdad their Soccer team was tortured and had their feet smashed and broken for losing..and in a few Countries they have no sports they just strap on a vest of dynamite and blow themselves up inside a crowded market or cafe…Their score? "Im dead, one hundred people are dead..that’s 1-100…To all you “Trolls” out there..You live in the best Country on earth..knock off the nonsense, stop punching a fellow american over a game and enjoy our sports..Win OR Lose..as George stated: “Life is too short”

by Bobbiblue on Nov 4, 2009 4:38 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

agreeing with someone on injuries not being the key

Having Canty back is not giong to turn this D-Line from a porous sieve into a stone wall. If he plays out of his mind it may create opportunities for the ends, but it’s not a simple, plug-in solution.
Likewise with Boley and Sintim. Boley should be able to help in short-pass coverage; Sintim may aid the rush. With AP (the brain but apparently not the body) in the middle it looks good on paper but remember: both OLBs (I know, 4-3) are fairly unproven commodities, and the Giants are not going to play the same 3 LBs every snap. It’s a bit of an athleticism boost and probably the main area for injury-related improvement, but again it’s no magic bullet.
So what if Ross comes back! We’re talking about moving corners to safety… the bottom line is, we have zero quality safeties and you’ll be robbing from peter to pay paul if you move a CB to S. We are going to have centerfield problems all year until we resolve the sucky-safety issue. It seems “safety” is not a fair title for Brown and Rouse … “danger” might be more apt. Our “Free Danger” and our “Strong Danger.”
Eli. Injured his foot before the Oakland game, in the prior week he missed more practice than in any subsequent week. And he threw the ball extremely well — not just bad coverage but really well thrown passes. The injury did not affect his mechanics in the week where it seemed it would hamper him the most. The fact that he has practiced more since that week would seem to indicate that the injury has not worsened. This is speculation on my part because I don’t feel Eli’s pain, but the evidence indicates to me Eli is suffering from a few things identified already: (1) predictable playcalling and the overuse of the long bomb, (2) poor decision making — throwing into double coverage, and (3) simply being off target. I think blaming on an injury is equally speculative to what I am saying, that he simply has not been playing well.
Our offense has been virtually injury free, as Bradshaw has played without any missed time and played well.
We do not need a marquee receiver signing. Smith is 1st-rate in the slot, Nicks is developing well as a vertical, and Manningham compares well with many 3rd-men in the league — we also have the serviceable Hagan and the Project (he who must not be named active) so there’s no eprsonnel issue there.
It’s time to stop whining about injuries and blaming them for poor play. The Eagles are much more beset by key injuries than the Giants and they beat the F*&^ing S@#$ out of us.
It seems to me the key issues here lie with coaching and execution — not so much personnel and injuries.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 3, 2009 4:44 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

How about Ty Law for safety?

by jessie1 on Nov 3, 2009 6:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Communication problems

Coaches coach, players play. Football is a team sport,
Anything that happens on the field, both the coaches and players
are responsible, players are trained by coaches, a player must practice till
he can execute the play.
if a player cannot execute then find another player that can.
Both coaches and players are highly paid to do their jobs.
If they can’t perform, replace them.

by Olddiehard on Nov 3, 2009 6:50 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Eli Not concerned

How can Eli and T.C. say they are concerned. It looked to me like Eli was in a daze and the defence were looking in the wrong direction .I think T.C. should look back at last year and get back to basic.

by muttsey88 on Nov 4, 2009 12:38 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Pierce?
Small
Going Out With A Bang
Small
Jacobs: I should have had surgery
Large_flag_of_brazil_small
Strahan: 'Osi, stop saying stupid stuff!'
Asu-dance-team-10_small
Super Bowl in NY (NJ)
Small
Best NFL UNIFORMS/HELMET
Images_small
Trade options
Small
New York Metropolitan area sports
Giantschampionshiprings_small
With LDT now announcing he'll most likely definitely be gone from SD...
Small
Mike Francessa

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mile High Report
Horse Tracks - 2/10/10 - Off-Season Begins
Gang Green Nation
Scouting The Draft: Jordan Shipley, WR, Texas
Niners Nation
Golden Nuggets: I promise

SPONSORS

Get Your Giants' Gear


Editor-In-Chief

Bigblueview_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Blueshirt_banter_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Moderators

Small brisulph