Not much nice to say about the Giants effort, or lack thereof
Here is a little of what is being written and said in the aftermath of the Giants 26-6 debacle last night against the Denver Broncos.
Here is a very damning statement from running back Brandon Jacobs.
"I'm angry for the simple reason, it doesn't bother me that my numbers weren't there," Jacobs said. "I just want to win football games. We didn't give us ourselves a chance. We gave the game away. We went out, and we didn't play hard and they took it. ...
"We didn't want it bad enough, they wanted it more, and they came out and outplayed us."
Guard Chris Snee agreed with Jacobs. Here is part of a column by Steve Serby of The New York Post.
It wasn't the altitude that sucked the air out of the 6-5 Giants. It's the attitude. They don't have any. They don't have any meanness, they don't have any toughness and they don't have any clue, and if they keep playing like this, they will not have any hope.
Snee was asked what was missing.
"It seemed like there was no fire," he said. "It just flat-out seemed like they wanted it more. You'd be hard-pressed to find one or two games where you could say that about this team."
The Giants Football Blog had this to say.
The only redeeming quality about last night’s mail-order performance by the Giants is that it was broadcast on the NFL Network, so millions across the country were spared the anguish.
Tim Smith of the New York Daily News says the Thanksgiving Day lack of effort was a disgrace.
With so much on the line, and looking to build on their victory overAtlantalast Sunday - one that snapped a four-game losing streak - the Giants came out flat, listless and disinterested. ... There were better games of football played by fat guys on the lawn after Thanksgiving dinner than the what Giants displayed against the Broncos Thursday night.
From The Sporting News.
The Giants were manhandled on both sides off the ball ... The Giants (6-5) looked almost unprepared for the Broncos' intensity. Having snapped a four-game losing streak the week before, the Giants saw things on film they could take advantage of.
"The list of how to go about defeating the Broncos was really very simple," Giants coach Tom Coughlin said. "Over the last four games, people would rush the ball on them, they would win the turnover battle, they would win the time of possession, (and) they would score in the green zone."
Here is one more from Coughlin.
"We didn’t have any tempo and we didn’t make any plays," Giants coach Tom Coughlin said. "We keep talking about winning the physical battle and controlling the line of scrimmage. We thought this would be the night and it wasn’t."
0 recs |
79 comments
|
Comments
Broncos fan here
Steve Serby can say “It wasn’t the altitude…” but he wasn’t playing at Mile High. Giants had a long flight on a short week and that had to have an effect. I enjoyed my team’s win, but I have no illusions that the Broncos are that much better than the Giants (on a neutral field). I’m hoping the Giants take it out on Dallas (can’t stand them).
We will now discuss in a little more detail the Struggle for Existence.
Charles Darwin. (The Origin Of Species)
Good win by your team
This is not just one game the giants have been playing like this for 6 games. Even our win last week felt like a loss because the defense stunk up the joint. No Excuses Broncos beat our butts and right now I don’t think we are as good as the Bronco’s because we have not been able to put it all together against a good team since week 2. This Bronco’s loss feels a lot like the Eagles loss, becasue we didn’t even compete.
by Late for Dinner on Nov 27, 2009 12:09 PM EST up reply actions
Brad your team
Played with intensity and passion..Our guys were flat-out flat..Our guys were not sucking on oxygen tanks..They didn’t need any..We were outplayed across the board and the Broncos played the game like it should be played, they hit, tackled, covered, caught, ran..on and on..They did what they had to do all of them..We waltzed out there and got spanked.
hater.
What did Dallas ever do to Denver other than hand you a win?
"I’m ready to go here, all right? It’s like R. Kelly at recess."
"You will come back stronger then ever. Like Lance Armstrong. But with two balls."
-Ari Gold
They exist
- every news network thinks that when they get 1 win, they’re super bowl contenders.
-The whole “America’s Team”
and loads more that anyone who doesn’t live in Texas, or isn’t a frontloader would hate
Single cover the real Steve Smith at your own peril
Well said
Also, their uni’s are worse than boring.
We will now discuss in a little more detail the Struggle for Existence.
Charles Darwin. (The Origin Of Species)
I sort of like their unis
I can’t love them because they’re a rival, but there are worst jerseys.
Single cover the real Steve Smith at your own peril
You guys played your hearts out
and deserve the win. You had “the fire”, and though that can’t be measured as yards-per-catch can, it was obvious that you guys had “it”. We both needed the win and you guys just took it! BTW, I miss “grit”. You guys had it on both sides of the ball. Congrats!
This Giants team reminds me of Ron Dixon or Tim Carter in that, there seemed to be so much potential, so much room for achievement; what seemed so attainable is reallistically just flat out unreachable.
We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.
Third time this season this has happened
I think this loss made a lot of Giant fans look in the mirror and realize the team is going nowhere this year. Even if we lucked out and somehow made the playoffs I doubt we would get out of the first round because we have to many holes
by Late for Dinner on Nov 27, 2009 12:05 PM EST reply actions
Me either
However I am trying to remain optimistic!
by Late for Dinner on Nov 27, 2009 1:25 PM EST up reply actions
I'm so glad
to have my impression validated by players and observers. Holy crap, the Giants played as though the winning team would be executed. They did not listen to Herm Edwards explain why you play the game.
I shut this game off with 10 minutes to go, something I have not done in a long time, not because the score was insurmountable but because it was clear that there would be no effort by the Giants to make a game of it.
Guess what? I’m picking against the Giants in our weekly pool the next few weeks, to gain ground on you guys.
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Nov 27, 2009 12:22 PM EST reply actions
coughlin
Fire him and the entire staff at the end of the season, please!!!
Fustration
Although I would not argue with fireing Sheridan and Gilbride.
by Late for Dinner on Nov 27, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions
its well past the point
of firing sheridan. i was really hesitant the first couple weeks because its tough for a new coach to assert himself. but with the season 3/4 done, its clear that he’s overmatched and consistently putting players in a position to fail.
gilbride, mehhhhh. but sheridan definitely needs to go. here’s hoping the giants can nab mike nolan or promote from within next season.
Sounds like your almost there with Gilbride let's talk after the Dallas game
by Late for Dinner on Nov 27, 2009 6:00 PM EST up reply actions
there's not much
i can say about gilbride that everyone else hasn’t. he calls an ok game, not exceptional, but not horrible. he calls what he thinks will works and leaves it up for the players. when it comes to gilbride i’d rather take the devil i know for the devil i don’t.
Yeah he..KG..called a great
Game last night..He called a game that got us a hefty 38 total yards in the entire first half…Unprecidented play calling ..He’s my hero..Name one other coach in the league that can hold his own offense to 38 damn yards for an entire half..He’s awesome..What a genious..Keep up the good work KG.
by Bobbiblue on Nov 27, 2009 8:58 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Jauron?
Philips might be available, depending on the ’boys fortunes.
jauron is a good coach
definitely won’t be a head coach this offseason. that would be an interesting hire.
It would be a horrible addition and it won’t happen.
by scrambledeggs on Nov 27, 2009 5:25 PM EST up reply actions
your reasoning?
dick jauron has been a good DC for a couple of teams, just because he wasn’t cut out for head coaching doesn’t mean he won’t be a solid addition to a team.
exactly
Mike Nolan failed miserably in SF, his D looked good last night. He did a nice job as Baltimore DC a few years ago.
Greg Williams failed in Buffalo, he did well in Washington and has gotten NO going in the right direction.
Jauron has a relationship with TC it would be a nice hire but they will not fire BS, they never do anything drastic like that after one year. It’s both a strength and weakness of this organization.
Two things I'm sure of:
TC will coach next year.
Eli will be our QB until he retires.
One thing I’m pretty sure of:
Kg will be OC next year
One thing that’s fifty-fifty
BS will be fired
i certainly hope so
on sheridan at least, normally i’m all about giving a guy a chance to succeed but its been exceedingly clear this season that sheridan was the wrong choice. he doesn’t have the temperament to deal with these guys and he’s being out coached badly.
BS
The only way BS is back is if we turn things around in the next 5 games and make the playoffs, otherwise i would put his chances at 30-70
by Late for Dinner on Nov 27, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions
30-70
sounds better, but the Giants being the Giants…I don’t know.
I'd really like to see what they do with Sheridan up in the booth where he wanted to be from teh start.
"It ain't over till its over"---
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 27, 2009 6:28 PM EST up reply actions
I'll give him a booth..
In a Circus..the dunking booth..
WHO'S THE TROLLER??
You’re on every blog site that I have looked at……………. so who is the troller? BTW – this is a football blog site, not a woman’s support group……………. if you cannot take criticism about your team(s), perhaps you should spend your time on Facebook with a bunch of chicks ventilating about their ‘issues’………………. some times the truth just hurts……….. as a Giants fan, at least I am realistic and admit it.
the hell are you talking about?
you spew some generic bullcrap about Eli and expect me to not call you out on it?
"It ain't over till its over"---
by FreeBradshaw on Nov 28, 2009 10:20 AM EST up reply actions
but they will not fire BS, they never do anything drastic like that after one year.
Exactly.
But – Either this defensive scheme is so tough that no one can figure it out (in my best sarcastic tone), or the teacher is not the best at imparting his wisdom regarding the system. Somehow it’s not getting across.
We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.
My reasoning is because if the DC is replaced there will be more than a handful of better choices than Dick Jauron who by now is known more for being a failure than anything Chicago, Detroit, and now Buffalo. I don’t care if he was the head coach and he’d be hired as a DC the guy has been on the losing side for the better part of a decade.
Not exactly a hire that would inspire confidence in your defense. Which seems to respond better to a younger more energetic DC.
by scrambledeggs on Nov 27, 2009 7:16 PM EST up reply actions
Interesting
Does Jauron run a 4-3 or would he change us over to a 3-4? How about Charlie Weiss for Chuck and Duck Gillbride
by Late for Dinner on Nov 27, 2009 5:52 PM EST up reply actions
hmm good question
not sure what jauron normally runs, but i’d think at this point in his career he’d know enough where he could adapt to the players already there rather than impose his system on a team already in playoff shape. theoretically.
the most frustrating thing about this
is that they seem to be the only team in the NFL that regresses as the season goes along.
think about it….
2005: 6-2 start, 5-4 finish, first round (shutout) loss
2006: 6-2 start, 2-6 finish, first round loss
2007*: 6-2 start, 4-4 finish (*they did win the Super Bowl, but my point is more with the regular season)
2008: 11-1 start, 1-4 finish, Divisional Round loss
2009: 5-0 start, ? finish, no playoffs (?)
i’m not calling Reese/Coughlin/front office, etc. out on the carpet but i think the question of “why is it that every year by the end of November, this team is playing its worst football?” is worth asking.
by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Nov 27, 2009 4:02 PM EST reply actions
good point SBTTM
We’ve caught whatever it is the Mets have contracted the past few seasons
by wilddre22 on Nov 27, 2009 4:24 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Good point
but in 05 they were 5-3 to start and 6-2 to finish even in 04 they started 5-3 and finished 1-7. The entire TC era we’ve seen this
Because of the 07 run this fact gets ignored and understandably so but it is something that needs to be examined.
Whats Changes from Last Year
Everyone keeps asking this question and as I look at this Giants team, all the personel on defense are the same so it must be Bill Sheridan. The defense couldn’t stop the Lions right now, and now that Steve Spagnolo’s defense isn’t there it finally exposes Kevin Gilbrides horrible play calling. Last year the Ginats didn’t have to score alot of points because the defense shut people down, now that they can’t shut down anyone, the secrets been leaked, I say fire Sheridan and Gilbride. Actually since the season is lost, lose out and get a top ten draft pick.
the problem with your statement Gary
Is that last year with spags as DC, gilbride’s O was top 5 in scoring. KG needs scrutiny too, but we can win with him, its been proven. BS is just, well, bs.
by wilddre22 on Nov 27, 2009 4:27 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I'd put one of our local high school offenses up against this defense.
We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.
Okay
well dre I can agree with you that it has been proven that we can win with KG, but…. we also had Plaxico for most of the season, amani and Derrick Ward, 3 key players that we are without, I love the new receiver corp, Steve Smith is a beast but he no Burress, he was the playmaker but while the new receivers get there snaps in the defense has to step up a bit to keeps the score within reach.
Read NJ.com
MG calls out the coordinators a bit especailly on O. His point is the Giants are calling running plays that call for finess type blocking and not staight ahead blocking that BJ and the o-line are uncomfortable with. I have no idea why they would be doing this but this is my point about talent and coaching. Coach to your talents. As fans we have no idea whats being called and what the coaches are asking the players to do on each play so it’s easy to just say we can’t block or run its all execution. Poor coaching can result in asking players to things they are not comfortable with are even good at and I have a feeling thats whats going on with this team especailly on D. I’m sorry even withouth KP Michael Johnson and some of the other D-backs are not that bad they just look lost out there.
good job landeta
My point in putting some heat on the coordinators is that to me, its too simplistic to blame just the players. Yes, they are the ones that go out and make plays or don’t, and that’s why we try to draft the best. But look at it like war for a second. When a country goes out to battle and loses, we don’t blame the soldiers. No, the history channel and such have made careers off of breaking down battle plans, where they succeded and where they failed. Generals have made careers off of finding that winning gameplan that allow us to reduce world leaders to hole hiders. They get the credit, and the blame for what they do.
Well, our generals are KG, BS, and TC. And this is a cerebral game we watch, to me the most cerebral. So its only right that the thinkers get some of the blame in this rapidly downward spiral of a season.
by wilddre22 on Nov 27, 2009 5:07 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I think it's the players
You are right – it’s easy to blame the players. It’s just as easy (maybe easier) to blame the coordinators. I think we have two different problems.
On defense, I think we have injuries. Umeniyora, Robbins, and Cofield are coming off knee surgery, and all three play like they have not fully recovered. Canty had a hamstring, Bernard had some problem in camp, and Tuck has a bad shoulder. Add to those the injuries to Phillips, Pierce, and Ross and you have major problems. Sheridan may not be the greatest DC in the world, but all he can do now is shuffle lame horses.
On offense, the problem is the O-line, and I have no idea what the problem is, although I think Seubert’s shoulder is a lot worse than the team is saying. He is just driven back into the backfield on too many plays. As for the rest of the line, I have no idea; they have suddenly become ineffective for no obvious reason.
I note the comment above that the plays called require finesse blocking. The O-line has never really been a power blocking line; they have no big Leonard Davis to blast through the D-line. Example – the problems they have on short yardage situations. Rather, they have had success pulling and trapping; the team has traded strength and power for athleticism and mobility. Now they can’t pull and trap either.
This is a problem in more ways than one. The O-line is the highest paid unit on the team, using a big % of the salary cap. The five starters are scheduled to make over $11 million in 2009 and over $14.5 million in 2010 (including $2 million to Seubert if he is still around). That is far too much $$$ for people who aren’t producing. It also means that if Reese were to make cuts, he would free up a lot of $$ for the free agent market.
What can be done? On defense, not much. Just substituting one injured player for another. Except – lets have Sintim play and see what he can do. On offense, lets see what the kids can do. Lets play Beatty at LT and move Diehl inside to replace Seubert. Play Barden and Beckum. Let’s see what the OL backups can do. This would accomplish two things:
>Remind the players that those who don’t produce will sit
>Give Reese a better idea what he has, so he has as much information as possible going into the offseason.
Am I giving up on the season? Perhaps, but the way the Giants are playing, the only team they would beat is the Redskins, and I am not sure of that! Why not start building toward a better 2010?
Mickey C
All good points and we can debate this all day
but in regards to the finesse blocking the article makes reference to how they are using those plays for Jacobs when in the past they would use more of the straight ahead style for BJ and use the finesse stuff for Ward. The article goes on to state the running backs coach has acknowledged this fact weeks earlier yet they continue to do it. I actually think KG is ok and I have defended him but when I read things like this I just get the impression the Giants coordinators are trying to fit a square peg in a round hole some times.
I tend to push blame on coaches more than players because every year you can point out a few teams that with little change in personal drasticly improve on offense or defense because of a coaching change. The talent level between teams is so small that coaching in the NFL more than any other sport makes a difference.
Denver and NO improve drasticlly on D with new coordiantors, heck the Denver owner fired Shanahan because he refused to change D coordinators.
Miami was a 1-15 rotten team in 07 they do turnover some of the roster but they’ve become a quality team in one year with new coaches conversely Dallas O-Line performance dropped off in 08 from 07 when they lost Tony Sporano.
Baltimore imoporved offensively when they hired Cam Cameron to coach the O yet they sturggle on D since they’ve lost Rex Ryan but they are starting to play better.
The Bengels hired Mike Zimmer in 08 and they have improved drasticly on D since then.
Our Giants took a big step forward when they hired Spags in 07
Jacksonville sturggled on D in 08 when they lost Mike Smith to ATL
The Rams D got a lot better in 01 when they hired Lovie Smith to be D-Coordinator.
Dallas D has improved since Wade took over for Brian Stewart at the end of last season. Those are the one’s I can think of off the top of my head I’ sure there are more.
I agree BS got dealt a bad hand with the injuries and some of the players so even with a great coach they would stuggle a bit but they are not struggling they are one of the worst defenses in the league and that is a result of more than just injuries and a few lame horses.
I agree 100% with you
Time to get the young guns some real game experience and get an early jump on 2010….2009 is a wash.
i watched the wohle game
allthrogh i understand why u shut off the game i did againest sd with 14 min left last week becuse i feif we gave up on d i wish we wouild play like this against sd u are not that bad we made more plays than u we wanted it more i think u o-line and d-line lost the game
okay i have cereal palsy arhrtis and chronic fatiue as well i have a grea life loveing folks some days are better that other days i got a make a wish in 2001 saw my favorive team the broncos was the trip of the lifetime i wish everyone couild gotten to enjoy that with me i know some of u hate the broncos and that ok but i bleed organ and bule
I will tell you what the difference is from last year
At the beginning of the year, lots of the press was calling the Giants a good team, and many said they had a shot at the SB
It was the kiss of death
LOL so true!
Whenever they’re predicted to do well they suck and whenever they are picked to be celler dwellers they’re really good.
In 2000 and in 2007 all the “experts” had them fnishing out of the playoffs, they made the Super Bowl. In 01, 03 and this year they were supposed to compete for an NFC title and they were 7-9, 4-12, and 6-5 so far but it does not look good.
Coaching..
Let us use our favorite fall guy..Brown..How the hell can he not be taught how to cover where and when..We know he can tackle, but who the hell is teaching that kid what he needs to excel?..Is he really that stupid?..or is the secondary coach?..or lack thereof..Our coaches stink and like I said..Coughlin needs to throw his headset off stomp on it and run over and get into these fools faces, like Parcells would have done already…and he needs to send this message to the players..You won’t be a New York Giant much longer.
I don't know..
But Nolan was sitting up there picking our well telegraphed offense apart..In fact at one point he didn’t even have his reading glasses on..He was Stevie Wondering it…it was that easy…I’m surprised he was not playing pin the tail on the donkey with his gamechart..They ate us alive last night.
What is with the Coughlin worship?
As Blue Gonz pointed out in a satirical post, we are one helmet catch away from NOT winning the Super Bowl against the Patriots. Far too many of you have finally gotten on board the “fire the coordinators” train, but TC remains sacred. I have advocated for weeks that TC AND the two coordinators must go if this team is EVER going to achieve and reach the highest levels again. I’ll say it again – ever since Plax went down with his self-inflicted stupidity, the Giants have been a mediocre football team, the 5-0 start this year against less-than-glorious competition notwithstanding. And TC is unable, unwilling, and unprepared to make the changes necessary to be anything but mediocre. I can’t imagine Jerry Reese still thinks that TC is the man to coach this team beyond this year. Blue Gonz says that TC WILL coach the Giants next year. I will go on record right now and say if Tom Coughlin coaches the Giants next year we will win 5 games. With anybody but Coughlin, I say we win 10!!!
by nybaseballgiants on Nov 27, 2009 9:23 PM EST reply actions
I don't kow if it's worship
as much as it is acknowledging what he has accomplished and how the team has responded to him over the years and believing he is a better option than what is currently available. They went from 6-10 to division champs in a year. He did hire Spags in 07 and changed his style a bit to get the players to respond and he deserves some credit for that. The GIants played loose and relaxed under him in the 07 playoffs yes they needed some luck to win that game but NE won 3 SB’s by a total of 9 points and they are a Donnovan McNabb stomach virus, John Carney kick out of bonce, and Kurt Warner pick from being the Buffalo Billis of the 2000s so luck plays a big roll in a lot of these games( I know Blue Gonz made that point not you but I wanted to address it). They went to the playoffs 4 straight years under him in a very competative division someting few teams have accomplished this decade. The Steelers have not even done that only the Colts, Pats, Seahawks and Eagles have this decade. Other than Bill Bellicheck he compares very well to to other head coaches both active and non active so unless Bellicheck is avaliable you’d be risking a lot by getting rid of him. Put yourself in the shoes of the GM. You would really be risking your reputation and maybe your job if you fired a coach with that kind of resume becasue of one 7-9 or 8-8 season. How do you know the next guy would be as good? It could also prevent you from getting a good coach becasue they would be afraid of getting fired the first sign of trouble kinda like the problem they have down in DC. Pittsburg stuck with Cowher from 98 to 2001 when they had 3 straight lossing seasons. The Giants did not fire Parcells becasue he missed the playoffs in 87 and 88 after he won a SB. I’m not saying the Giants do that with TC if that happens but you just can’t get rid of a coach who’s had success everywhere he’s been becasue of one bad season.
The other thing is who is that much better than TC out there. You’d be taking to big of a risk with a young unproven assistant. Bill Cowher is the only option that might be better but remeber he lost a LOT of home playoff games when his teams were big faviorites and he typically got really tight and conservative in those games and outchoached. I also remeber him following up his Super Bowl Championship season with a 8-8 finish. John Gurden, I don’t think he’s better than TC. His teams were inconisitant in Tampa and collopased horribly last year down the streatch. TC has some wierd tendencies but I’m sure you would not be happy when Gurden decides to keep 5 QB’s on the active roster because well he likes to have a lot of QB’s. Shannahan it’s been a while since he’s won SB’s. His teams were very inconsistant after Elway, they never had a good D and in fact he was fired because the owner asked him to fire the D-Coordinator after there typicall late season collapse last year and he refused. I know you’ve killed TC for being to loyal to his coordinators but thats what did Shanahan in. Holmgren, sure you can make an argument for him but he struggled mightly from 2000-2003 in Seattle and was so bad they took away his GM title becasue he could not handle it while coaching. I’m not saying these guys are not very good coaches but they’ve sturggled just as much as TC has and it’s debatable that they are better carrer coaches than TC.
I’m not saying I don’t agree with some of what your saying. Your point about not adjusting since the Plax thing is a very good point. They’ve also always seem to fade late in the year with TC while they peak in late October. Yea he hired Spags but he also hired John Huffnegal and Tim Lewis originally to be their O and D coordiantors. The Sheridan hiring is not looking like a great hire right now. So your points are well taken but you have to acknowledge that the positives have outwieghed the negatives in his tenure and so does JR when he evalulates his coach at the end of the year.
One last thing. I wanted to ask you and I’m not asking to be a wise guy but becasue I just joined this blog a year ago and I’ve notice you’ve been very critical of TC all year even when they were winning. Did you feel the same way in 06 and 07 in regards to firing him? Were you against hiring him in 04? I’m just asking becasue I know there are some fans & media that hated the hire from day one and have jumped on him hard when he’s struggled.
Landeta, great post!
Seriously, citing all the history is what truly good commentors on blogs like this can do. But as far as coaches go, their past performance is NOT in my opinion, the main reason to hire a coach. Many many good to great coaches on bad teams doing wonderful work. And who knew what Tomlin would do as a head coach. And the same goes for Caldwell at Indy. And McDaniels at Denver. And they had no headcoaching track record so I’m not holding out for Bellichick when it is a coaches’ approach and personality that interest me rather than his record. All coaches have their idiosyncrasies as you well document. But TC is clearly the most resistant to change among all of those listed. As far as my history with TC goes, no, i was not about firing him in 06 or 07. But I was against his initial hire in 04 for the simple reason that I thought he was too old and out of touch at the time. I know how conservative the Maras have been over the years and even with Tisch involved they weren’t going to hire a younger, more dynamic “no-name”. That’s not how the Giants historically have done things. But after all this time, and especially since Post-Plax, I want either a proven head coach or a young, dynamic coordinator as our next HC. And again, as far as this year goes, I hated what we looked like even as we were winning those first five. With rare exceptions, we still didn’t have a pass rush, we still had no LBers, we still had an unsettled secondary, we still had no killer instinct, we still had terrible team speed, we still were remarkably unimaginative on offense, we still were remarkably predictable on offense, we still had a HC coach signing off on offensive and defensive schemes and plans that I and many others found wanting. All can be laid at the feet of an intransigent, OLD, boring, redfaced heqad coach named Tom Coughlin. He must go if we are going to compete.
by nybaseballgiants on Nov 28, 2009 2:26 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks I love good banter like this
Your right guys like Bellicheck, Marv Levey and Mike Shannahan failed in their initial sitnts as Head Coaches and then were successfull later on while Mike Ditka, Tom Flores, and George Siefert won SB’s but were awful later on with different teams so I could see what your saying in regards to wanting a certian coach because of approach and rather than track record figuring if the GM puts talent around him that approach will lead to success. I guess the thing that scares me with unproven coaches is that for every Mike Tomlin there are a few Eric Mangini’s Rod Marinelli’s and Scott Linehans and if JR got rid of TC right now to try and find the next Tomlin he’d have a better chance of hiring a Managini type. Pittsburgh has an unbelievable track record when it comes to hiring young unproven guys from Noll to Cowher to Tomlin. I don’t trust the GIants can do that they let Vince Lombardi and Tom Landry leave to hire Ali Sherman . . . LOL!
Also look at the other guys the GIants interviwed in 04 other than TC they were first time head coaches and TC has faired the best. Charlie Weis, Romeo Crenel and Lovie Smith. I know every situation is different so they could of had different results if they were hired in NY and don’t get me wrong I have no problem with hiring an young unproven coach but I guess I have not seen enough bad from Coughlin to justify the risk of going in a different direction right now. If the GIants are in the same situaiton next year it’ll be a different story. As much as I liked the TC hire my first choice was Nick Saban from LSU at the time! Wow that would have been a disaster! I think Acorsi wanted him too but his financial demands were too much so they did’nt even bother to interview him. Sometimes that old fashion Mara conservatisim works.
Thanks for answering that question about TC, I had to ask it because there seem to be so many people out there that wanted him gone the second he walked in the door and were all over him at the end of the 06 season it did not make sense to me to fire him at the time when injuries and an erratic QB and some selfish players were hurting the team during the 06 season.
I’ll give you credit for not liking what you’ve saw early on. I think you and ZILAG were the only posters that were on this. Like some other fans I did not like what I saw in the preseason but after they went 5-0 I think I ignored some of the issues I thought were there. They were winning games they were supposed to and thats what good teams do so I was not that worried. I also think them winning the Carolina game last year to clinch home field gave everybody a false sense about this team. I was not part of this blog then but all of my Giant fan buddies were so happy but to me that game showed how far they had fallen in such brief period of time. I felt that if the Giants were playing as well as they were when they got to 11-1 they would of beaten Carolina at home by two TD’s. I will admit this season is the worst coaching job of his tenure here. They have been outclassed by 3 teams this year and the best game they’ve played was a loss to SD in which TC tightened up a bit at the end of the game.
Whew, those last three posts felt like reading a couple of chapters! lol
But, good points abroad. I really can’t add anything, just giving out a kudos shout!
a lot of good coaches
have never won the super bowl. at least we got there under TC. under coughlin this has been a very good team, consistently making the playoffs.
ask the cowboys how they’d feel to have coughlin, or any other coach that at least makes it to the superbowl.
Giants coaching
The lack of preparedness by the entire team vs. Denver was a disgrace, the most embarrassing loss in many years by a Giants Team, given what was at stake. The coaching staff MUST bear some of the responsibility for this. Generally, I have felt the offensive play calling is predictable and lacking creativity, especially in the red zone. The offensive line is a big disappointment. And the defense is too vanilla, lacking pressure on the QB. No way they make the playoffs unless some dramatic changes take place.
No pride and no strong desire to win
Maybe they think that having one Super Bowl ring is enough, they are treated like heroes at home. What is the point in putting in the extra effort, no one else seems to be doing it? Having no prima donnas is great, but having no leader who refuses to let his teammates sleep walk or gets excited about a great play, or demands a high tempo getting in and out of the huddle. We are missing that charismatic player-leader. No team would dare to sleep walk on a Phil Simms team or a Brett Favre team, or a Ray Lewis team. It’s not college ball where the emotions of the school pride play a part, it is a violent day-to-day job where you are hoping to make it out uninjured. If you can take a play off, or a game off, or a season off, and it seems that everyone else on the team is doing the same thing, why not? Get paid the same.
One of Eli’s strengths has been his calmness under pressure and his ability to stay unmoved regardless of the media attention positive or negative. He will never be the guy to fire up the team and hold the players accountable. The Giants don’t actually have anyone with Brian Dawkin’s fire in their belly.
I don’t think this is the job of the coaches. Players are used to turning off the speeches of the coaches. People work harder for their colleagues than they do for bosses anyway.
Although I enjoyed the fact that the Giants were a team of equals and without glory hogs, Maybe zero prima donnas is too few.
by Spider Lockhart on Nov 28, 2009 2:57 AM EST reply actions
maybe that is what we really lost when we lost strahan
strahan makes a pre-game speach, and we played with fire in san diego. maybe what we lost was not so much his pass rushing ability, but his team leadership
by Spider Lockhart on Nov 28, 2009 3:15 AM EST reply actions
We lost his ability
to rush the QB as if he were going to actually get a sack; we also lost his ability to stop the run. He was pretty masterful at both. Usually when a speaker can back up his words with actions (as Strahan could) it meant something. Otherwise the speaker should drink a pot or two of coffee, stand at the top of Niagara Falls, and empty his kidneys – while hoping the wind doesn’t suddenly change directions.
We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.
Bronco fan here
I actually came over to see how your fans were handling this loss. I thought I might learn something, as our site (Mile High Report) had more contention than I was comfortable with as we went into the tailspin that resulted in 4 straight losses. Part of this was the disappointment expressed by members that had joined in at MHR after becoming excited by 6 wins, and part of it was a re-adjustment of expectations of the long-term members that occurred with the losses. You guys have done well, keeping your eye on the points of trying to analyze the deficiencies and how to mprove the team in the future ……instead of mindless ripping. You have a good group of commentators and fans here, the repectful banter has provided a nice site for Giants fans. Congrats!
BTW, when we at MHR were most divided, one of our members known for his negativity suddenly posted an analysis of what he LIKED, instead of his usual very competent analysis of what was wrong. It came out just before the Giants game, galvanized the fans, and seemed to pull the site together. Have you, perchance ,got a guy here known to be curmudgeonly and generally focused on the negative, but whose football knowledge is well respected? Secret weopon to pull out once in a while. Good luck to you and your team the rest of the season and for next season as well. I lurk around several sites, but now that I have joined I may stop by again, if its OK with you guys.
Come whenever you like
Its always a better conversation with intelligent fans of other teams.
Single cover the real Steve Smith at your own peril

by 



















