Big Blue View: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Along The Olentangy for Ohio State Fans!

3-4?

The 3-4 is the new defense in the NFL. the Steelers, Ravens cowboys and chargers have all been using it for a while for a big amount of sucess. Denver and and others used it this offseason with good results. I think it will help bring pressure. The only position that we would need is possibly NT but i think the Steelers NT is a FA after this season and maybe we could steal him or maybe trade for Cleveland's Shaun Rodgers.

Star-divide


The line up would be…
DL: Canty, NT (Robbins or replacement), Tuck ( i think he’ll be able to shut down the run well enough)
I also think Jay Alford will make a good 3-4 end but hes out now.

LB: Osi (I dunno if it will work but hes so athletic i think he can do it), Pierce ( or replacement), Boley (kinda like Timmons on the steelers) and then Kiwi or Sintim on the other edge

 

That sounds pretty scary... and with a NT i think we will have much more talent and 

FanPosts are written by community members. This is simply a way for community members to express opinions too long to be contained in a comment.

0 recs  |  Comment 31 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

In the future...

they may and yea, they do seem to have the pieces. Also interesting is the fact they’ve drafted Sintim, who may be a better fit as a LB in the 3-4, and also signed Canty, who was a pretty good DE in the 3-4.

Osi’s transition would probably look like Aaron Kampman’s on GB, but he’s really just an average lineman right now, so a change may help.

I’d rather the D-Line be Tuck and Canty as ends, with a brand spankin new NT (or maybe FredRob…probably not FredRob).

Kiwi would probably turn into a terror off the edge too. He’s play LB in the 4-3 too, so it wouldn’t be all that big of a transition for him.

Definitely not this season tho. We’ll see on the future of Sheridan, and even his replacement if he runs the 3-4.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 15, 2009 9:11 AM EST reply actions  

Sheridan's replacement might be here soon...

I think theyd be blitzing osi alot… and hes already had some experience playing in space in Spag’s system…

by matth313 on Nov 15, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions  

?

What does Spags have to do with it? They didn’t run a 3-4 with Spagnuolo….

He stood up and played in ‘space’ about 3 times last year.

The entire defense, while it may not be a bad idea anyway…would have to undergo a lot of personel changes

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 15, 2009 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

The Zone blitz

He wasnt playing last year… but still it wont be a total shock for him and hed still be blitzing probaly 50-75% of the time

by matth313 on Nov 16, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

the 3-4 is very effective but you must have the right personnel

i dont think osi, while he is very athletic, could handle dropping back in coverage as some 3-4 outside lb’s are asked to do from time to time. sintim came from a 3-4 in college so he would be a perfect fit, and canty played in the 3-4 with dallas, but antonio pierce would get beat up in the middle without a couple DT’s taking on some blockers for him to get free. we would have to have a huge NT in the middle to clog up the line, which we dont have right now. i also think that tuck isnt an ideal 3-4 DE. though he is big and strong enough and does play in the middle in certain packages, he and osi excel at rushing off the edge. i like the way the giants run the 4-3 with a great signal caller like pierce quarterbacking the defense and a defensive line rotation that includes osi, tuck, kiwi, robbins, canty, and cofield.

by GiantsReignSupreme on Nov 15, 2009 10:23 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah, i don't think Osi would be ideal at LB

He’s got a quick burst off the edge, but it’s the idea of him out in space in coverage.

by Hootman on Nov 15, 2009 10:36 AM EST up reply actions  

The 3-4 is by no means new and it is not inherently more effective than the 4-3. It all comes down to personnel, and the Giants have been feeding the 4-3 system for years. As long as JTuck is our best dman we won’t be switching, because doing so would severely limit his impact.

by XLII on Nov 15, 2009 11:58 AM EST reply actions  

the 4-3 isnt working

and with the addition of a NT wed have amazing personel for the 3-4

by matth313 on Nov 15, 2009 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Where are we getting this Nose Tackle?

Great NT’s aren’t a dime a dozen.

I agree with XLII. As long as we have Tuck, a great pass rusher, we’re never going to change to a system where he’d mainly only be occupying guys and stopping the run.

The Cowboys are the France of the NFL
-thwalls

On 3rd down, throw it to Smith.

by Willgfass on Nov 15, 2009 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe pull a draft move

About the same as the jets this year… about 5th pick to get the huge guy from Alabama, Terrence Cody. The guy is an animal
and i think we need a NT to run the 4-3 more effectively anyway so we can blitz 4 on run downs as well

by matth313 on Nov 16, 2009 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

no chance in hell

the Giants trade their entire draft for the 5th pick.

Even less to get a lazy POS like Terrence Cody. His only claim to fame is being 370lbs…he’d be a waste of a pick.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 16, 2009 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

this statement

is false.
for one, the giants won a superbowl and have been consistently good running this base defense. any defense will work if you have the right personnel for it that execute their assignments.

for another, the giants love putting their best rushers in the game at the same time and considering their strength is the line and not the much maligned linebacking corps, a 3-4 scheme with current players would not play to their strengths.

third, the giants COULD swap to a 3-4 and change their defensive mentality but it would be a very rocky 2 year transition to get to that point.

by cntrlalt on Nov 15, 2009 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

yea...

the bigger problem is injuries to the secondary.

3-4, 4-6. 5-1…none of it would help that.

I’d love for Ross to come back and be A-OK so that the D-Line can get a few coverage sacks. Haven’t seen one of them in a while.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 16, 2009 8:09 AM EST up reply actions  

If Kenny Phillips weren't injured

and Dockery/Ross weren’t out for most of the year so far we wouldn’t be having these discussions. We already knew coming into this year we didn’t have the deepest secondary due to lack of veterans (which is a good thing for the future) because a few injuries could put us in bad situations. I’m not one for blaming injuries but in this case I am. 3-4 defenses take years to mold…The Chiefs, Lions, and Broncos are all going to the defense but that’s because they are in rebuilding molds. Would you rather be in our position or theirs?

by RIPShea on Nov 16, 2009 8:51 AM EST up reply actions  

yup.

Tho, you can also look at Green bay as a success of it.

It takes an offseason of personnel changes.

Tho I would have to say, piecies like Tuck being potentially a very good 3-4 DE, Canty already being one, Sintim and Kiwi potentially being excellent Rush OLB’s, Boley being potentially an excellent ILB.

..the Giants do have some nice pieces that, if this season does take a turn for the worse, hiring a DC who knows the 3-4 the Giants really wouldn’t have to make a huge transition.

You also gotta remember that they have guys like Alford and Bernard, who can be nice rotational 3-4 ends, as would Cofield if he’s re-signed (I think they do anyway and cut Bernard instead)

NT would be a problem, but maybe FredRob could be a cheap backup and in the draft this season there are a lot of potential NT candidates.

I agree, they shouldn’t change it. But its not out of the question for them to do it and be successful, even early on.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 16, 2009 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

Dan Williams from UTENN

of Boo Williams from Wake Forest are much better options than Cody.

He’s fat and lazy.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 16, 2009 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

3-4

sort of a moot conversation at this point. Read the wikipedia entries on 3-4 and 4-3 to get a better idea of the personnel differences. The Giants are loaded on the D-line with 4-3 stars and weak in the LB corps. They’d have to trade & draft with 3-4 in mind for a few years to be in that sort of position. And again a guy like Vince Wilfork or Albert Haynesworth, this is a rare and pricey commodity.
Honestly, even with Sintim’s potential & Boley, do you want to see 4 Giants LBs on the field?

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 16, 2009 8:13 AM EST reply actions  

so uh...

overall, I disagree with you Matt, we should NOT switch to this just cuz its “new” and what everyone else is doing.

I do think they should consider it tho, cuz guys like Sintim Kiw, Osi and Boley could be very good in it (So Simms…how does a LB unit of Osi, Sintim, Boley ,Kiwi sound?) and guys like Tuck and Canty could work well in it.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 16, 2009 11:27 AM EST reply actions  

I agree with most of what you're saying

However, I don’t see Osi Umenyiora ever being a linebacker. Ever. For anyone. And we’d potentially squander some of what the team has been building for. And FredRob is NOT an NFL nose tackle. I have no humbers in front of me but I’m thinking MINIMUM 325 pounds. And of course Kiwanuka will end up schizophrenic.
Hate to say it, but the best way to go 3-4 would be to trade Osi & Tuck! Get great value, get a nose tackle. Then it’s be NT, Canty, Bernard, with Robbins & Alford behind. Kiwanuka, Boley, Sintim IS 3/4 of a good 3-4 LB corps, I admit! And some of this underachieving corps (Kehl, Blackburn, Goff, Clark) Might improve with a different scheme.
I am 50-50 on the concept, my main point being it doesn’t fit Osi & Tuck.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 16, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

it's a big gamble

on whether Osi has that versatility. Or whether his ego would interfere with a move. Also, I put the 2 best NT’s in the league, Wilfork and Haynesworth, at an average weight of over 360. Who knows. It certainly is the missing piece. You’d sure hate to waste a No. 1 draft pick on a NT who may or may not develop! I guess with the right draft it could be done in 1 year, but at the same time that would shortchage the OL/DB needs the team has. I’ll give JR a ring and tell him to shore up those needs for 2010 and drop TC a note that he should consider a 3/4 DC for 2011, when we have the liberty to complete the draft needs.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 16, 2009 12:32 PM EST reply actions  

IMHO, your team has what it takes in some positions

Osi is quick and fast enough to make a transition and he would benefit greatly from facing TEs or RBs from time to time. He’s also pretty good against the run, for his weight, which is a plus.

Cofield and Canty would form a good, though unspectacular, tandem at DE.

Robbins has the size, but he lacks a motor, for example what made Jamal Williams as good of a NT wasn’t his massive size, but the fact the he never stopped moving his legs while pushing. In the present his motor is gone and his level of play suffers.

Pierce may have what it takes. For example, everyone and their mommas, questioned the Cowboys for taking Keith Brooking in a position of need after the year that he had in Atlanta at MLB. Fast forward, there’s people arguing that he’s the best ILB that our Franchise has had since the move to the 3-4.

But that’s it.

The move takes Tuck off the field for the regular packages, the Cowboys among other teams use a lot of 4 man fronts in their Nickel and Dime packages, which may give Tuck like 50% of the snaps. But 50% of the snaps off the field is waaaaay too much for someone like Tuck. The rest of the BEast would be glad, though.

I don’t think that Kiwanuka has it, I look at him and think of Manny Lawson, who hasn’t been able to completely grasp the responsabilities of being an OLB. I think that he’s a much better pass rushing DE. His run support and coverage leave a lot to be desired, and those are a must on the edge.

And I doubt that Boley has it, he would have the coverage part down, he’s fast and has some instincts for the position, but everything that I’ve seen from him makes me think that he’s soft and wouldn’t really work in a 3-4, having to take head-on a pulling Guard or Center, or shooting through their gap would be asking too much.

The Giants would need some serious drafting and to trade their best weapon, or taking snaps from him. It’s a maybe, but I’m inclined to say apples and oranges, your team can’t run it, or at the very least shouldn’t.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Nov 18, 2009 12:37 AM EST reply actions  

You dont think Tuck would hold up as a 3-4 end? he is incredibly strong. You guys had to trip him up to try to stop him.

by matth313 on Nov 18, 2009 3:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes, he's strong

But the League is full of strong guys and you can look around at every 3-4 team. Now, find me a 3-4 DE that weighs less that 290 pounds.

They have that weight for a reason, from time to time, due to scheme, they will take a double team of Tackle and Guard head on to leave an OLB either alone or with a TE or RB. The DE at the very least needs to anchor to keep the pocket closed. That’s why they need their weight.

For example, Greg Ellis used to be a 4 man front DE, he was never a good one, but he was efficient because he’s always been technique maven, he used to weigh around 270. When Parcells changed the Defense, he had an overweight Ellis (280) at DE. The move was a complete failure, Ellis not only never adjusted to the position, he was a complete waste. In the next year Parcells moved him to OLB and he made a successful transition.

Not saying that Tuck won’t work because Ellis didn’t, I’m saying that it would be a waste of talent.

Viva México! Go Cowboys!

by Chandus on Nov 19, 2009 1:31 AM EST up reply actions  

lmao

are you guys kidding? 3-4? Really? Just last year we had the 4th or 5th best defense in the league and now everyone wants to go to a 3-4? This year they haven’t played as well but some of that is because of the injuries, disappointing play from eli, and bad calls from Sheridan. If Spags was still here or we had gotten someone who knows how to use the 4-3 well we can have a dominant defense easily.

Besides the Ravens and Steelers get to stat pad on defense against the terrible browns….

by mclaren_is_the_best on Nov 18, 2009 6:54 PM EST reply actions  

no one really wants them to switch to the 3-4(I hope...)

Most are just saying that if they got a DC who ran it, it wouldn’t take forever to gut the D and start over cuz they have plenty of players who could play well in it.

The main fact that it would lessen the impact of the Giants 2 best defensive players, Tuck and Osi, makes it fairly moot anyway.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 19, 2009 6:50 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Buffalo Rumblings
Gailey Confirms Fitzpatrick As Bills' Backup Quarterback
Pride Of Detroit
Detroit Lions Name Four Captains
Arrowhead Pride
NFL Roster Cuts: Chiefs Cut Signs With Another Team

SPONSORS

Get Your Giants' Gear

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Photo

2010 NFL Preview, Baltimore Ravens: It's Joe Flacco's Turn

New York Jets wide receiver Darrelle Revis signals to the fans during football practice at the new Meadowlands Stadium, Wednesday, June 16, 2010 in East Rutherford, N.J. (AP Photo/Bill Kostroun) +22 updates

When You're A Jet: Darrelle Revis Agrees To Terms With New York On Extension

Baltimore Ravens wide receiver Mark Clayton (89) makes a catch in front of defender Cary Williams (29) during the NFL football team's training camp, Monday, Aug. 2, 2010, in Westminster, Md. (AP Photo/Rob Carr)

Ravens Trade WR Mark Clayton To Rams

More from SBNation.com >


Editor-In-Chief

Ed_valentine_2_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Blueshirt_banter_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Small brisulph

Authors

Tyree_believe_small cjmulrain