Big Blue View: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: New media and the Loss of Sportsmanship

Let's blame Tom Coughlin for everything -- and anything

New York Giants head coach Tom Coughlin.

More photos » Jeff Roberson - AP

New York Giants head coach Tom Coughlin.

New York Giants head coach Tom Coughlin seems to want to take the blame for everything, which is probably what a head coach is supposed to do when things go bad.

TC was quite clear where the buck stops with the Giants during a Wednesday rant.

"I’m responsible for all of the decisions that are made with our football team. The green zone decisions are my responsibility. They are nobody else’s. No one else made a mistake. The quarterback did not make a mistake. The decision was mine. I was asked the other day if I had an opportunity, would I change it; would I do something different?

Well, my answer to that is: does that mean that I can also change the fumbled snap, the ball that we thought was going to be a fourth and inches that ended up being fourth and 10, which nobody has even recognized or talked about that. Can I change the running into the returner on the fair catch penalty? Can I change the 29-yard pass interference penalty? If you will give me a chance to change all of those, I’ll change all of those, too.  But it is my responsibility and that is where it stops – right here.  Nobody else is to blame. So let’s not continue to grope around trying to figure that situation out. 

I will tell you right now, we were doing everything we possibly could to win. We had managed the game very well. Our kicking game had helped us out. We were in a position where we thought that the opponent would have to drive the ball the length of the field and score a touchdown to beat us. And, unfortunately, that is what happened. But the on-the-field decisions are mine.

That little tirade got me to wondering if there are other things TC should be held responsible for, too.

Star-divide

  • Like the fact that his star safety developed an arthritic knee. Or that 'Bad, Bad C.C. Brown' is a worse player than anyone could have imagined.
  • Like the fact that Justin Tuck has been playing hurt since Flozell Adams of Dallas tore Tuck's labrum in Week 2 with a cheap trip. 
  • Like the fact that Aaron Ross seems to heal as quickly as a 90-year-old man.
  • Like the fact that Eli Manning hurt his foot. Shouldn't he have known that would happen and ordered him treated beforehand?
  • Like the fact that his punter suddenly seems to have decided to act his age.

Probably ought to hold TC responsible for some non-Giants stuff, too.

  • Like how bad the Browns, Raiders and Rams are.
  • Like the fact that Jim Fassel has to coach in the UFL. Oh, wait, that one might actually be Coughlin's fault since he has done so well as Giants coach following the miserable end to Fassel's Giants tenure.
  • Like the fact that Brett Favre is still in the league. Ahh, that one might really be his fault, too. 
  • Shoot, maybe global warming and unemployment are Coughlin's fault, too.

Not sure what the point of this little rant was, to be honest. It just felt good to write. I like TC, and I like the stand-up nature of what he said Wednesday. To be honest, all I care about is whether he can do something about that nasty four-game losing streak. That's what is important.

0 recs  |  Comment 72 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Ed seeing the light

See Ed TC is too easy of a target, thats why a lot of us just prefer to skip over TC and blame Kevin Gilbride for everything, and with the way the D has been playing Bill Sheridan is fast becoming our backup whipping boy!

by Late for Dinner on Nov 12, 2009 1:51 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Sheridan vs. Gilbride

Man, now there is a question. I might even have to put up an “if you could fire one Giants assistant would it be KG or BS” poll.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 12, 2009 2:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Tom "Cock Blocking" Coughlin

is the reason Im not dating Kate Mara right now. It has to be his fault and has nothing to do with the fact we have never met.

by ryanwk628 on Nov 12, 2009 1:53 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

TC might

take responsibility for that — but only for protecting Kate from you. LOL!!

by Ed Valentine on Nov 12, 2009 2:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I Like it...

I like how TC is taking the blame but I also like how he touches on the litany of mental mistakes that we committed.

truth is what’s done is done…there’s no sense in harping on all the wrongs that have been committed the past month. Well, I suppose we can because that’s what we do….but at least TC stepped up to the plate and set the record straight.

what fumbled snap is he talking about? on the blown FG attempt?

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Nov 12, 2009 2:00 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, on the botched field Feagles fumbled it a little.

by potroast on Nov 12, 2009 3:15 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

field goal I mean

by potroast on Nov 12, 2009 3:16 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I like TC too.

And I am very much looking forward to a better second half of the season and a playoff run (I am an eternal optimist). However, I would like to see the coaching staff do a better job of reacting and overcoming adversity and better utilize the talent that they have.

Here is what I am hoping they work on in the next week and a half of practice:
-Faster tempo on offense. Break the huddle and get to the LOS and snap the dang ball. They need to practice with a sense of urgency. Plus it puts them in a better rythm and gets the D on their heels.
-Have a tweak for the offense if things don’t go as planned, but don’t throw out the gameplan and immediately revert to the Run-N-Shoot ala Houston Oilers. Sorry KG, that is not how the Giants can win football games.
-Figure out who is putting what personnel on the field and when. That previous post doesn’t inpsire confidence knowing that KG doesn’t make the call as to who is on the field. Leaves too much room for confusion and doubt.

I can go on and on with more arm-chair coaching critiques, but the bottom-line is they need to come out against ATL pissed off. Win the game and they “control their own destiny” (I hate that line, but it is true). That loss against the Chargers stung, but there was alot of promising things to take from it. I just want to see them learn from their mistakes and play up to their potential. Is it next Sunday yet?

by Larry Soprano on Nov 12, 2009 2:06 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

off topic....any boxing fans in here?

this weekend should be a good fight…I want Cotto to win but this guy Paq is a monster….

thoughts?

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Nov 12, 2009 2:07 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think that PacMan takes it

…..guy is too fast and doesn’t stop coming forward. PacMan by late round KO. Should be a good one.

by njgiant on Nov 12, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah, unfortuantely I agree....

but i would love it if Cotto can whip him…

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Nov 12, 2009 2:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

He keeps the pressure on, but

I don’t think it’s accurate to say he keeps moving forward. He moves in, out around, throwing punches all the while. If he reverts to his old style with Cotto (which he probably will if he’s hurt) he’s laible to lose

by blue gonz on Nov 12, 2009 3:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I think PacMan's punch volumn will be the difference

He’s the human version of the Energizer bunny.

by njgiant on Nov 12, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I was going to post something on this myself, reminding everyone that this could be the fight

of the yead/decade. As far as a pick, Pac is faster (as fast or faster than Mayweather, IMO) and has been able to carry his big punch up through seven weight classes (unheard of.) Cotto is bigger and stronger and can probably hit harder than anyone Manny has faced. Freddy Roach thinks that the beating Margarito gave Cotto (probably with the help of doctored gloves) will hinder him. I’m sure Freddy has something up his sleeve that he’s not telling us. He never talked of Hatton being a sucker for a lerft hook before Manny fought him. After the fight he did. What’s he not telling us this time? For Cotto it could be the way he steps in with gloves high then steps back. Maybe he’s a sucker for an uppercut? Then maybe Manny is biting off more than he can chew fighting a true welterweight, but I don’t think Freddy would throw him in there with Cotto unless he thought he’d win What next, middleweight, like Basilio? Yeah, Pac is a monster and the Vegas line favors him heavily. Anyway, based on the way Cotto’s looked since Maragrito, I’d say Manny wins, but I wouldn’t bet on it. Manny improves with every fight. He used to be a pure brawler and now he’s a slick boxer as well.

by blue gonz on Nov 12, 2009 3:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, has potential......

to be FOY. Still debating on kicking out that $55, the wife wants me to get it for sure. FOD would be PacMan vs Money, but I think that Floyd dodges that bullet for as long as he can.

by njgiant on Nov 12, 2009 4:42 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Only Manny can make that fight

happen. Floyd will never agree to Manny’s getting his rightful share of the purse.

by blue gonz on Nov 12, 2009 4:45 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

and Manny doesn't fall

in the category of aging star. Manny is in his prime and would pose his greatest threat yet.

by njgiant on Nov 12, 2009 5:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yup....

and Manny is a big name himself…$ will def be an issue if Manny gets past Cotto…

which i think he will but I also think it’s gonna be close.

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Nov 12, 2009 5:11 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

nj & and

Right on both counts. Manny could very well be a bigger name than Mayweather now and esp. after the Cotto if he wins. May might find it cinvenient to accept Mosley’s challenge to avoid Manny. It’ll be a hell of a fight even if it ends in a KO.

by blue gonz on Nov 12, 2009 6:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

yeah...

i don’t even know if Mayweather would want any part of Pac

"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT

by andiamo708 on Nov 12, 2009 7:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think he wants any of Mosley either.

While Money is the fastest man in the game, Shane still has some quicks himself. Shane has power and overall, I think that he has faced the stiffer competition during his career. Also when the two were in the ring after May’s return fight, I noticed a pretty good size discrepency. I did not know Shane was that much bigger than Money.

by njgiant on Nov 13, 2009 8:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I can only say...

nope

coaching

Sorry lboogie, it just popped right to mind.

by brisulph on Nov 12, 2009 2:17 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

This arguement makes no sense.

He’s saying he would only change the things in his control (kicking a FG instead of going for a TD) if he can also change the things out of his control (such as running into the receiver on a punt). Actually, now that I think about it, what he’s really saying is that it wasn’t the decision to go for 3 points that was pivotal to the loss (which would have been his responsibility) but the errors made by all the players that lost the game. So really, TC is taking no responsibility. It’s the mistakes by his players that forced him to make that decision.

by rzor on Nov 12, 2009 2:40 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

You've got a valid argument

to the extent that TC believes execution is the key ingredient to success. It’s the coach’s job to see to it that the players execute. Ed, the CC disaster seems to fall into the lap of TC and JR. CC couldn’t hack it from day one. Couldn’t they have addressed that problem sooner?

by blue gonz on Nov 12, 2009 3:38 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

CC

I believe that right now the handling of the depth at safety, and particularly the signing of Brown, might be the biggest mistake of the Reese era as GM thus far. It’s been obvious from the beginning that the guy could not do what the Giants brought him here for. And you know how much faith I have in Reese.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 12, 2009 4:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The irony is that Reese played safety in college ...

but I think overall, no one is questioning the job he has done personnel-wise.

by Shofner85 on Nov 12, 2009 4:22 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

did not know that

we might have been better off if Reese had just taken the field instead of Can’t Cover Brown!

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 13, 2009 8:59 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

the problem with this kind of "taking responsibility" ...

is there are no consequences, much like when a politician “takes responsibility”. Sounds good, but what is going to change ?

Also if it is too all encompassing, it really means nothing. We know he isn’t responsible for global warming. So to say “it all stops with him” takes others below him off the hook, who should be held accountable, and potentially with consequences.

Not holding others accountable (with consequences) is irresponsible, for a coach. Benching CC Brown was a great step, because someone who was “responsible” suffered a consequence, and something changed.

A few more “changes” (consequences) during the bye week would be encouraging, like firing the special teams coach (only one I can think of that isn’t a suicidal move mid-season).

by Shofner85 on Nov 12, 2009 3:01 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

enjoy the sarcasm ed but....

I know your a TC guy, as are most of us in here. I’ve come around on him from the rocky beginnings. But each of these 4 weeks, I’ve come on here the night of, or the next day after the loss, and we’ve bitched about every part of this team – special teams stinks, moss stinks, osi’s run D stinks, tucks shoulder stinks, our DT’s stink, AP stinks, CC stinks, Jacobs stinks, our O line stinks, KG stinks, BS stinks….yet no one ever takes it to the top of the food chain. We cannot continue to hit the coordinators if we don’t hit the man who they directly answer to.

It seems as if there is an erosion of some things that tom is known for, and he has to take a hit for it. One of the things are penalties. The last month we have gotten more penalties than I can ever remember a coughlin coached team getting. Last week alone we got over a hundred yards in penalties. That’s discipline, or lack thereof. And that is TC’s specialty, being a very disciplined team, who doesn’t best themselves. Yet, if someone has the numbers, look at how much we’ve been penalized the past 4 weeks, and the situations that we get them. Big boy was destined for the endzone had that hold call never happened.

That my friends, starts and ends with coach coughlin.

We all love him ed. But he has to take a hit, just as everyone else on the team does. Stop being so conservative as well in the play calling. That botched snap on the field goal try shoulda never happened. Run that bitch with your big punisher on 4th and nothing, on a team that is near the bottom of the league in stopping it, and hadn’t up until that point. Let’s get big on these cats!

That is all.

by wilddre22 on Nov 12, 2009 3:39 PM EST via mobile reply actions   0 recs

Oh, I agree

which is why I pointed out the other day when people were complaining about the run calls late in the game that a choice like that is usually based on the way the head coach wants to play the situation.
I will say this. Good coaches and good teams can have bad years. This might end up that way.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 12, 2009 4:09 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Right on re discipline.

To see a TC team exhibiting such a lack of it is distressing.

by blue gonz on Nov 12, 2009 4:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Not a TC guy ..

He’s brought his share of ‘history’ to the Giants, but by no means has he brought leadership. I can’t see a coach like Parcells putting up with anything like TC has (Eg, Hufnagel, Tim Lewis for 3 years, players not performing but staying on the field, etc etc).

TC talks a good game, but changes are not his stength. In fact, he seems to go out of his way to stick to the Program despite the results. Where’s the sense of urgency?

I’m not sure what we got out of that ‘confession’ by TC – what will change? I expect a leader as HC. That includes putting the fear of ‘consequence’ to the coaching staff too. Get on with it already

Go Gmen

by giants013 on Nov 12, 2009 5:05 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

FIRE COUGHLIN!!

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 12, 2009 3:55 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

LOL, Free!

I think you are a one-trick pony, though. Fire everybody. But, hire whom?

by Ed Valentine on Nov 12, 2009 4:08 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Does Jesus have a good coaching record?

I guess his ‘man management’ skills are good, and he already walks on water. However, has he ever coached in the NFL?

He was like a god walking amongst mere mortals. He had a voice that could make a wolverine purr and suits so fine they made Sinatra look like a hobo.

by Johannus on Nov 12, 2009 7:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

hire?

who said anything about hiring????

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 12, 2009 4:29 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lombardi

Had a great take on this today, basically saying that it was a good leadership move.

Was the loss Coughlin’s fault? Not really, but right now he has a very fragile team lacking in confidence. He knows he needs his team to play at the level it played last Sunday in order to win. To ensure that same type of performance, he took the burden of losing off his players. He can walk into the meeting rooms and honestly tell his team that he was the reason they lost a game when they played so well. This kind of honesty from a leader is called "management of self," which means that the leader is willing to accept blame and be honest with his team. It also allows him to be critical of his followers when the time is right, assuring that the criticism is heard.

from Diner morning news: Why Coughlin took the blame | National Football Post

I tend to agree just because even though we lost to San Diego, we looked much better then the team that got pasted the 3 weeks previous.

by queler on Nov 12, 2009 4:27 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

One thing i blame TC for, his trust!

So, ooooh no, you can’t blame everything on yourself while KG, BS and now another “culprit”, Jerald Ingram seemingly will be let off the hook. Their stuff hasn’t been up to par to say the least, but since you trust their judgement, they’re not up to standards.

TC needs to control more of what is being called and who is being called upon.

by Hootman on Nov 12, 2009 4:47 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Carl Pavano

I knew Brian Cashman was not to blame for Pavano’s injured buttocks. It was TC all along.

by Jaybat on Nov 12, 2009 5:10 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

TC is to blame

for the beer prices at the games, too. Just an FYI there.

We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.

by GAgiantfan on Nov 12, 2009 6:23 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Poor Fassel --

Off TC for a moment, but for Jim Fassel, for all of his flaws, to be banished to persona non grata status in the NFL is beyond me. The guy wasn’t a great coach. But he wasn’t horrible.
What dasterdly deed did he perpetuate for him to be branded pretty much an NFL untouchable? He’s not Ray Handley, for Crust’s sake. D. Snyder probably would have been better off with JF over Zorn, not much, but a little. Yes, Fassel’s teams had an odd habit of breaking down late in games. But, hell, he managed to make D. Kannel look respectable for half a season — even Dave Brown was looking better at the start of ‘97, reminding us of the short-lived promise he showed in ’94. And there were great moments under Fassel, even during losing seasons — Kent Brown to Toomer, defeat undefeated Broncos. ’98, Kerry Collins destroys Parcells’ Jets. In 2000 he brought what should have been a 9-7 team to 12-4, an NFC championship, a beaut of a whupping of the Vikings, and a super-bowl berth. Yes, they lost, but them even being there was more improbable — talent wise — than the 2007 Giants super-bowl. So, in short, my question: does anyone have any idea why Fassel seems to be maligned within the NFL?

by ZILLAG on Nov 12, 2009 6:49 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I've thought about a lot and ofer the following:

1. The team fell apart in his later days.
2. He took over play calling from Sean Payton, a recognized offensive genius.
3. Perhaps the single biggest was bring fired as OC by Brian Billick, a personal friend.

by blue gonz on Nov 12, 2009 7:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Coughlin is definitely to blame for not at least trying for a TD on third and goal from the 9. Manning and other players said as much in the interviews. If he wants his players to keep playing hard for him, he needs to admit he blew it to his players. If he does so, they will continue to play hard for him. If he doesn´t then they may not. If he wants to wiggle out of it by bringing in a lot of other stuff, then he is not being very sincere.

by wkh19 on Nov 12, 2009 7:34 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

i blame Tom Coughlin

for drafting Fredrick Weis, Michael Sweetney, and Renaldo Balkman, trading Patrick Ewing’s massive expiring deal for a package that included an aging Glen Rice, an Aussie big man (Luc Longley), and Jon Koncak Travis Knight, dealing Latrell Sprewell for Keith Van Horn, signing Vin Baker, Jerome “Big Snacks” James, and Jared Jeffries to full mid-level cap exception deals, taking on Shandon Anderson’s contract worth $41 million, trading Trevor Ariza for Steve Francis, giving up two unprotected first round picks for Eddy Curry, and including the Knicks’ 2010 first round pick in the Stephon Marbury trade six years ago.

i also blame TC for world hunger.

by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Nov 12, 2009 9:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I just shed a tear right there....

We NEEEEEED the Knicks back.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 12, 2009 10:49 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The Knicks?

They are still in the league? Thought they folded.

by Ed Valentine on Nov 13, 2009 8:34 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

they should.

then get a real owner to buy them.

THat’s the real problem. A sane owner would have fired that former Pistons PG as soon as he started running amok.

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 13, 2009 9:00 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

WOW

Wow SBTTM…no one has ever just layed it down on paper like that. When you break it down like you just broke this debacle of a NY basketball team down, it makes my already sick stomach sicker. That is a disgusting laundry list of bad draft picks, horrible trades and signings that the knicks pulled off in the last decade. You bought back names I’d long since forgotten – Michael Sweetney anyone?!

Wow, that is all that can be said for my poor knickerbocker team right now. Please bye week end soon.

by wilddre22 on Nov 13, 2009 12:55 AM EST via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

The Knicks might be the worst of the original NBA franchises

The last decade might have been their worst. As for bad draft picks, that amounts to the same old story with them. Take a look at a list some time. Their best choice was picking Frazier over Barry. IMO, Frazier was a better all-around player (not a good a scorer,) and a better team player. Besides, Barry would never have stayed with the Knicks. He went where the money was and teams went wild with the bucks to get that scoring machine.

by blue gonz on Nov 13, 2009 7:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

SBaker only mentioned about 1/5 of the worst things....

From Scott Layden to the PG from Detroit..to the coach that shall not be named.

Fredriec Weis was the start of the horror show tho.

I don’t even want the prince from Cleveland either. Just maybe Charles Barkley’s T-Mobile buddy and some parts.

Cap room is great.

…as a side note…anyone see Eddy Curry lately? He looks like Plaxico Burress. Not just the chin hair…but he lost like 90 lbs…he really looks like Plax (if Plax was 6"11)

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 13, 2009 9:03 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

true

i didn’t even mention taking Balkman over Rajon Rondo, and Channing Frye over Andrew Bynum.

sad stuff. i love the Giants, i really do, but there’s something different about the Knicks when they’re contending. they seem to be the one team that the entire city can rally around. in my opinion, there is no professional sporting event that tops a Knicks’ playoff game at a sold out Garden.

by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on Nov 14, 2009 1:19 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Frye actually looked like he had talent his rook season

then he got buried on the bench, traded, and now…where is he? this kid was putting up like 16 and 8 his rookie season.

but yeah, we’re the worst franchise in the NBA right now. bring on lebron…

by wilddre22 on Nov 17, 2009 1:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You left

out America’s two front war.

by blue gonz on Nov 12, 2009 10:12 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Re: The "I Don't Care" sentiment

The Giants lose to the Chargers but as long as TC can make the changes necessary to get us to the playoffs, YOU DON’T CARE. (I will be changed to You for grammatical purposes) The Giants lose badly to the Eagles but you don’t care cause we’ll get them again at our place. The Giants get exposed by New Orleans but you don’t care cause we’ll see them again in the playoffs and make the changes necessary to beat them and anyway, they won’t go undefeated and we’ll figure out how to play them. The loss to Arizona, the underutilization of the TE, the lack of a push from the OL, the atrocious linebacker play starting with AP, the lack of a pass rush, the exposure of our defensive backfield, the mediocrity of Eli in clutch situations, there are countless problems that are NEVER ADDRESSED but YOU DON’T CARE cause TC is our guy and he’s righted the ship before and didn’t we win that SB just 2 years ago? So many of you seem to live in a world where each game is mutually exclusive of every other game. And we have as our head coach a man who lives in that world as well. He learns nothing from week to week. He makes no changes, or small changes, and expects a different result. And so we get cutesy blog headings blaming Tom Coughlin for everything. And the blog acolytes jump right in with their laundry list of oh-so-funny things (Pearl Harbor, the Lindbergh baby kidnapping) that we should also blame TC for. With rare exception in the comments to this heading, most of you are just fine with TC and the way things are going. Someone clearly joking writes Fire Coughlin and the immediate response is And Hire Who. I have been advocating that Coughlin and the two coordinators MUST ALL BE FIRED AT SEASON’S END. Not a soul has advocated firing Coughlin NOW but many of you seem to enjoy creating the specious argument so you can knock it down. This team has been in a downward spiral since Plaxico shot himself but the lasting damage wasn’t to his inner thigh or even to his freedom. The lasting damage has been shown to be a direct hit on the Giants as TC made FEW IF ANY CHANGES at the end of last season and after a 5-0 start against less-than-stimulating opponents (I know, the Cowboys at their place, a quality win but there were so many holes even in that win) the lack of change is criminal. But very few of you care cause we’ll go 5-2 or 6-1 or 7-0 down the stretch and then anything can happen in the playoffs and weren’t we the Road Warriors just 2 seasons ago in the magical run to the title? Far too many of you look at each game ahead as also mutually exclusive to the other games. A season in any sport is a living, breathing organism and what happens one week, if not addressed, or barely addressed, will fester and burst and kill that season. To that end I give you all the problems we, all of us, have pointed out all year. THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. So keep on saying YOU DON’T CARE, keep thinking that the intransigent, unable to change Tom Coughlin will work miracles and overcome his own handicaps and the added handicaps of Gilbride and Sheridan and injuries and poor execution. The worst thing that could happen to this team would be to make the playoffs as a mediocre, filled-with-holes 9-7 or 8-8 team. Because you’d all be jumping up and down saying good ol’ TC, he got us to the playoffs. BUT NOTHING WILL HAVE CHANGED. We will remain a mediocre 9-7 or 8-8 or maybe even, if the stars align, 10-6 team. And problems will not be addressed and next year will play out like that. But YOU WON’T CARE since you live in a world where what happens on Sunday has no bearing on any other Sunday. BTW, if you really didn’t care, there’d be no need for this blog. And please, take your shots, I can take it (not like Pacquiao or Cotto which shows how little you care by breaking into a boxing blog in the middle of Giants talk). I’ll just say this: I CARE. And at season’s end, if Coughlin and his two coordinators are not gone, I will still care. But please, I will clearly care more if they are gone.

by nybaseballgiants on Nov 13, 2009 10:10 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wow, glad you got that off your chest nybase

I think that this post did what it was suppose to do and that is to poke a little light hearted fun at the current situation that the Giants and their fans are in. When it comes to Giants football, I think we all care, some more than others. We all know the coaching situation and there will never be a unanimous consensus on if we should or should not get rid of TC and crew. I straddle the fence myself when it come to Coughlin, this does not mean that I don’t care about the Giants. Coughlin has done more good than bad for this team and besides, who would relpace him? Cower, Billick, Gruden, Sheridan? All good coaches and Superbowl winners but 3 of the 4 were fired from their last gig (proving that they aren’t coaching Gods) and Cower himself endured some losing seasons (he was just fortunate enough to work for an organization that trusted him).

I think that the Giants will be ok, we’re only 1 1/2 games behind the Boys. Are we going to the Superbowl?…I don’t think so, I,m sipping on a big cup of Saints kool-aid right now, but I still care for my Giants, don’t get me wrong…….and I still say that PacMan will knock Cotto out tomorrow night.

by njgiant on Nov 13, 2009 11:30 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

FIRE HIM!!!

FIRE COUGHLIN!!!

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 13, 2009 12:17 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

wow nybg

I like ya, and your writing, but you’re really at this point the guy with the torch leading the mob of pitchfork-wielders. Time may bear you out, although I hope for success’ sake it won’t. I believe TC and even gildrive (Sheridan yet unproven) have the capacity to take THIS team to the mountain again.
Can you cite any examples of coaches who have had a successful career, won a superbowl, and then “lost it?” and been bad coaches from that point on? Just curious as you seem well informed.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Nov 13, 2009 12:41 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Strongest Indictment yet

Glad you mentioned the Straw Man logical fallacy. It’s used to often by BBVers with an axe to grind.
The latest developments (in the public statements by coaches) indicate more disarray behind the scenes than i anticipated—the lines of authority are hopelessly complex and inevitably lead to the confusion we see on the field. Priority # 1 has to be simpliying/clarifying them. Confused players execute properly by accident /happenstance.

by blue gonz on Nov 13, 2009 10:49 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I believe that the current healthy Giants are simply overmatched. The penalties and blown plays stem from trying to play beyond themselves. With Osi, Tuck, Canty, and Bernard with Alford coming off the bench they have a good defensive line- Robbins and Tuck both need to go. In the defensive backfield, Thomas is a good nickel back but Ross needs to start. Even when Phillips returns they need another safety. At linebacker, Sintim is the future and Boley is a big improvement. They need a new middle linebacker. No coach could have won with what we now have on the field.
On offense, the line is not getting the job done- all the third and fourth and shorts they have not picked up and all the red zones failures are not the fault of Eli, but the failure to move the defense back even three feet. Jacobs is having a poor year and Bradshaw is playing hurt. Could Brown have picked up the slack? good question, in my opinion. The rash of injuries is at the heart of the Giants’ problems, not the coaching staff.

by Boyce R on Nov 13, 2009 4:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

wait...

Tuck needs to go?

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 13, 2009 4:26 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

FB, there's a brilliant 3-panel cartoon

1st panel – Woman in bed calls out to man on computer in other room – “Honey, come to bed.”
2nd panel – Man at computer, woman in bed in BG – The Man calls out “I can’t.”
3rd panel – The man staring intently at the computer screen. He has no intention of joining the Woman in bed but he does tell her why. – “Someone is wrong on the internet.”

Thanks for bringing that cartoon to life for me. (Well, except for the Woman in the other room, that is.)

by nybaseballgiants on Nov 13, 2009 4:39 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

LOL!

"It ain't over till its over"---

by FreeBradshaw on Nov 13, 2009 6:21 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

http://xkcd.com/386/

Great comic

The Cowboys are the France of the NFL
-thwalls

On 3rd down, throw it to Smith.

by Willgfass on Nov 13, 2009 11:59 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

And don’t forget: he’s playing hurt

by blue gonz on Nov 13, 2009 4:48 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

As Rick Blaine says to Louis, the Prefect of Police

and why am I even bothering, you know the line. Pleasure to meet you, my friend. (Yet another Frankenstein reference – “Friend.”)

by nybaseballgiants on Nov 13, 2009 5:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Quite a stretch. Seems tortuous and arcane.

I like:
What on earth are you doing in Casablanca?
I came for the waters.
Waters? What waters? We’re in the middle of the desert.
I was misinformed.
Now, that reminds me of some of the Q & A between reporters and NYG coaches.

by blue gonz on Nov 13, 2009 8:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Pierce?
Small
Going Out With A Bang
Small
Jacobs: I should have had surgery
Large_flag_of_brazil_small
Strahan: 'Osi, stop saying stupid stuff!'
Asu-dance-team-10_small
Super Bowl in NY (NJ)
Small
Best NFL UNIFORMS/HELMET
Images_small
Trade options
Small
New York Metropolitan area sports
Giantschampionshiprings_small
With LDT now announcing he'll most likely definitely be gone from SD...
Small
Mike Francessa

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Turf Show Times
Random Ramsdom 2/7
The Falcoholic
Hat Contest Winner #3 - Dirtybird915
Windy City Gridiron
The Bears Den: 02/10/2010

SPONSORS

Get Your Giants' Gear


Editor-In-Chief

Bigblueview_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Blueshirt_banter_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Moderators

Small brisulph