Big Blue View: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Blogger Q&A - And The Valley Shook

Ask a Silver and Black Dude


Sigh.  I've done this every week with the other SB Nation sites of the teams the Raiders have played.  Every week it gets harder because every week we get worse!  But, I still enjoy interacting with the fans of other teams and seeing if I can shed some light on what Raider Nation thinks about our team and franchise.

So....greetings!  My name is Raybin and I'm a denizen of Silver and Black Pride and a lifelong member of Raider Nation.  I'm here to answer any questions/comments you might have about the Raiders and the upcoming clash on Sunday. 

Fire away if the spirit moves you!  I'm happy to sit around the virtual campfire and B.S.

FanPosts are written by community members. This is simply a way for community members to express opinions too long to be contained in a comment.

2 recs  |  Comment 79 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Hey Raybin, glad to have ya.

One can only hope your not as bi-polar as a certain fan that came from the KC blog. They came in very respectful and willing to chat, but once it got close to game day they ended up piling on trash-talk normally reserved for sixth graders.

In any event I think you seem like a genuine fellow looking to trade knowledge of foes that couldn’t be in more opposite divisions of the NFL, so let me ask you a question…

I read a statistic pointing out that JMarcs best game had resulted in something along the lines of a 46 QB rating…in his best game. How long do you see the Raiders sticking with this kid, might we see a change this week against the NFL’s number one ranked pass defense?

"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."

by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 6, 2009 9:59 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't worry about me

We’re a pretty chill group on S&BP. Besides, we’re too busy complaining about our team to have much trash talk in the other direction. :-)

As for how long the Raiders stick with J-Russ? As with everything else in the organization, it’s all up to Al. At the minimum, I can’t see him being benched any earlier than our bye week. Honestly, I think he’s going to get the whole season. But reading Davis’ mind is always a tricky business.

The problem with benching Russell is who’s behind him. In poker parlance, the organization went “all-in” on JaMarcus this year. Bruce Gradkowski is our backup and if you’ve followed his career at all, you’ll know that the team is better off to stick with Russell and hope for the best.

The reason so many of us are frustrated and mad beyond belief is because Russell showed a lot in the last 3 or 4 games of last year. It seemed he was finally breaking through. I never expected him to be a great QB this season, but I did expect and was excited to watch a continuing evolution. instead, I’ve seen regression. It’s bizarre and no one quite knows why.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't think that's the worse thing though.

He certainly has looked very bad this year, but how else does one learn the game? As you said he was promising towards the end of last season so it would appear he does have the ability, and maybe he’s just lacking in confidence. I actually like the idea of sticking with him through the whole season…he’s a big investment, let him fail if he has to, but at least than you’ll find out what he’s truly made of.

"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."

by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 6, 2009 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

That’s precisely what I’ve been telling people: we’re not going anywhere this season with Bruce Gradkowski at the helm, so the best thing to do is leave JaMarcus in the water and see if he keeps sinking or learns to swim. If he swims then we’re in luck and can go from there. If he sinks, the organization can act accordingly. But this is a lost season already anyway, and it’s no harm to hope for a breakthrough.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Check out NFL take on Athlete tragedies

http://tightend.blogspot.com/

"Don't Be Afraid to Stand on a Pile of 'No's' for one 'Yes'"

by curiousg87 on Oct 6, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Oct 7, 2009 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Welcome

You seem polite, and we respect those who treat others well.

Could you name an unheralded or overlooked player the Raiders have? One from both sides (offense and defense) if possible? It is always neat to see who the fans of a team know about, but the rest of the league and their fans take longer to catch on to (like Steve Smith for the Giants, who is only now getting noticed as a real threat by the majority).

by brisulph on Oct 6, 2009 10:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

This is always a question I like to answer

Because I’m huge fans of the two guys I’m about to name:

On offense, it’s unquestionably our left tackle, Mario Henderson. Since taking over the starting duties in Week 14 (15?…cant remember. Something like that) of last season, he has completely shut it down over there. And I mean totally—as far as I know, he’s yet to allow a single sack and has been whistled for 1 penalty. It’s gotten to the point where the Broncos and Texans shifted Elvis Dumervil and Mario Williams to the other side of the line because Henderson wasn’t letting anything through. And, of course, the right side of the Raiders o-line is a sieve, so it’s doubly good strategy.

Henderson vs. Umenyiora should be fun to watch. Even if Mario handles him, I’d anticipate a big day for Justin Tuck who should be able to tee off on Russell all game.

On defense, it’s our weak-side linebacker, Thomas Howard. If he played on any other team, I think he might’ve been Pro Bowl bound by now. He’s an amazing pass defender, his hustle never stops, and he tackles well. He’s probably one of the two or three most underrated linebackers in the league.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I will surely watch Osi

and how Smith does in the slot then. Thanks man, always good to hear about a lineman nobody knows about.

by brisulph on Oct 6, 2009 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I've been a big fan of Smith since his USC days

I knew he’d break through eventually and it’s good to see him getting some recognition.

 Wouldn’t be surprised to see Smith line up on the strongside to put him opposite Ricky Brown who, quite frankly, sucks.

That’s the problem with the Raiders: enough weaknesses to ALWAYS create matchup problems. Can’t throw against Howard? Move the receiver to the other side. Can’t beat Henderson? Move the pass rusher to the other side.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

hmm...

Mario Henderson?

Wasn’t that 4th rounder you got for Randy Moss used on him?

People (ESPN/idiots…) always say how lopsided that trade was, but its nice to see it panning out for the Raiders.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 6, 2009 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Henderson was our 3rd round pick

Our fourth round pick from the Moss deal was John Bowie who was recently injured, waived and then re-acquired and placed on IR.

No doubt the trade was lopsided, but honestly the way Moss played with us, he was probably only worth a 4th round pick. He dogged it. I’m glad he’s gone.

by Raybin on Oct 7, 2009 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is Richard Seymour happy now

or at least less disgruntled?

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Oct 6, 2009 10:23 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Seymour seemed content once he arrived

But I’m gonna guess he’s already frustrated at what he’s seen happening around him. He’s known too much success in his career to be able to quietly handle the level of failure currently around him.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nnamdi Asomugha

Feel bad for the guy. He plays his butt off and has done so for a few years now. Honestly, it starts at the top. Al Davis has lost it. Sorry to say it but I don’t think the franchise will go anywhere with Al calling the shots.

by Lucky7 on Oct 6, 2009 10:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

We feel bad for Nnamdi too

I have no doubt he’s the fan consensus choice for #1 favorite player on the roster. He deserves SO MUCH better.

You won’t find me doing much defending of Davis. In fact, I recently had enough and took him to task for his antiquated ways.

Not that it’ll do any good, but it helped me vent my spleen.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I feel for you guys

It sucks to have bad ownership. As a Knicks/Mets fan, I can somewhat relate…

I kinda like the Raiders (when they are not playing the Giants). The week 1 game was a bit of a tease, because the Raiders looked like contenders.

Good luck! Starting next week… ;-)

by M. on Oct 6, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Real nice writeup Raybin

Helps me understand the Raiders Fan base a bit.

by Lucky7 on Oct 6, 2009 1:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thank you. It's so frustrating

The team has horrible holes—notably on the right side of the offensive line and defensive depth and wide receiver experience—but it’s not without talent. But watching Davis drag the ship down with his old ideas and stubborn refusal to change is disheartening on a level you can’t even imagine unless you’re a fan of the team it’s happening to. “Frustration” is the best word to describe the state of Raider Nation now. “Disgust” is another good one.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Question for you G-Men fans

A lot of the more hopeful among us (me included for a while, but J-Russ has just been SO BAD recently) pointed to Eli Manning as reason not to give up on Russell yet.

Please correct me if I’m wrong here, but if I remember correctly Eli wasn’t developing as fast as many hoped, but then came that rainy game in Chicago when his light suddenly seemed to click on and boom!….Super Bowl.

Even if Russell suddenly “gets it” on Sunday (which he won’t), I know we’re far, far, FAR from a Super Bowl team. But is it a valid comparison to make for those in Raider Nation who still want to have hope?

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 10:43 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

JaMarcus Manning

Ray, sorry man but I doubt it. Eli came into a tough situation in 2004, I think he replaced Warner and lost a ton of games. But those Giants (6-10?) still weren’t as bad as these Raiders. The big knocks on Eli were toughness, leadership, and accuracy. Two of those three had more to with being a rookie on a team of big names & egos. His physical tools were never really lambasted, nor, I think, was his decision making, despiute the predicatbale few zillion-INT games. In the meantime, the Giants have put a stellar roster around him, especially with the O-Line. He’s become a leader through the team’s natural turnover and building from within. He hasn’t changed much physically since then, although perhaps experience has made him much more reliable. His biggest asset, the crunch-time drive, is something I feel is part of his personal makeup, which has been honed, not learned.
I’d say JaMarcus Russell is probably the worst QB in the league. The front office (read: Al) doesn’t seem to have the gumption to build around him or focus on the trenches. WHat you have is what you have, and I see the guy’s best outcome as being traded to a team with a good QB coach and O-Line, where he could become a serviceable, but not top-filte, QB. He seems to lack good decision-making skills, but it’s hard to tell what’s him, and what’s on the OC.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Oct 6, 2009 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Some of that actually sounds like JaMarcus

He has the physical tools and the knocks on him have also been toughness, leadership and accuracy. He has looked tougher this season. He can (hopefully) work on his accuracy and improve it like Eli did.

The big difference is leadership and commitment. As far as I’m aware, Eli shares the Manning family work ethic. By all accounts Russell, errr…..doesn’t. At all.

I think if Russell steps up and leads and becomes willing to put in the work necessary to be a successful NFL franchise quarterback, we’ll be fine. If not, we’re screwed. So far, most of the signs are not promising.

And as you point out, the current Raiders are just so bad, it’s difficult to succeed no matter what.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Work Ethic

Without saying I’m an expert, Eli has shown great ethics and worked hard to improve himself and the team.

Russell, from what I’ve heard, is visibly overweight, and doesn’t put in the effort.

Garcia had to be released to protect Russell
No one in the giants front office thought of releasing warner to protect Manning.

I could be very wrong though.
As you said, your back up won’t help, and if Russell shows promise, great, if not, as you said, the seasons over.
The problem would be if Davis comes back next year with russell and he shows no improvement.

by Willgfass on Oct 6, 2009 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Another Raider fan here

and I just need to add that Garcia asked for his release and pouted the whole time he was here. He never embraced his role as a back-up/mentor/motivator for Russell and seems only concerned with himself.

Also, I am hoping the Manning Russell comparisons hold true. I see similarities. The biggest being inconsistent accuracy, perception of a lackidaisical attitude, and impressive late game drives.

The biggest differences as has been pointed out is the talent around them and probably the work ethic. Although Russell has worked to get himself in better shape as the season has progressed.

Wherever I go, that's where I am.

by noontide on Oct 6, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Noontide is right

When Garcia realized the organization was going with JaMarcus, he asked for his release. Can’t say I blame him, really. Didn’t like his attitude, though, so I’m not shedding many tears.

The more I think about it, the more I’m becoming convinced it’s all about work ethic with JaMarcus. Can he devote himself to being the last one out of the building? Can he force himself to watch that extra film? I’m not optimistic, but hopeful, if that makes sense.

If he grows up and commits, he’ll succeed. If he doesn’t, he’ll be on the next train to Bustville.

by Raybin on Oct 7, 2009 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The leadership knock on Eli...

…wasn’t really valid. It just took a while for people to understand his style. But I knew he had leadership on the last play of his rookie season, when a called an audible on 4th and goal to win the game.

by hopeforthefuture3 on Oct 7, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Growing Pains

I understand that QBs must have them. Eli went through some serious ones and the NY Metro Area Media is ruthless to athletes that don’t produce immediately so he was scrutinized. The one thing that really stood out though is that even though he was lambasted by the media about how he’s not the one, how he’s got a noodle for an arm, how he thows too many picks, etc, etc…his work ethic and preparation for games was never questioned.

Going through some growing pains is a part of it and some of that is on the coaching staff and the executive office not really setting him up to succeed. They don’t have to call to many homerun plays and maybe take some pressure off him by pounding the run Mike Bush more and maybe drafting an oline before they get a shiny new receiver. The worrisome thing is what we have been hearing lately from people in the media (as Rich Gannon and Jeff Garcia) is that JRuss has been slacking, not preparing, and has been fined for being overweight. Something you dont want to hear from someone struggling is that they are kind of letting up.

by Lucky7 on Oct 6, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The reports are coming fast and furious this past week...

….that tend to confirm that Russell is slack and doesn’t much give a damn. If even 10 percent of them are true, we’re in serious trouble. If they’re all true, we’re irredeemably screwed.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, only temporarily...

…screwed. There’s always the future.

by hopeforthefuture3 on Oct 7, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Check out NFL take on Athlete tragedies

http://tightend.blogspot.com/

"Don't Be Afraid to Stand on a Pile of 'No's' for one 'Yes'"

by curiousg87 on Oct 6, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eli was always pretty good....

I’ll never forget that GW throw to Plax in OT in his first year against the Eagles.

He was very inconsistent with his footwork, but by all accounts the guy has the type of work ethic and smart you want from a QB. Also, according to big Bro, Eli has always been a tough bastard and also supposedly has a stronger arm than Peyton.

He deserved some of the criticism, but its just cuz its NY and it seems that 80% of fans and media are completely incapable of dealing with the growing pains of a young QB.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 6, 2009 6:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or a kicker...

Or head coach, etc.

"We'll show up tomorrow and do the same thing we try to do every day, kick Pedroia's ass in cribbage and try and win a baseball game."

by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 7, 2009 9:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

What's up with Darren McFadden?

He’s been outperformed by his college understudy, Felix Jones, so far. Is it b/c of a bad offensive line, bad play calling, teams loading up on the run, or is he just the next Reggie Bush?

Also, how is Darius Heyward-Bey performing so far? You guys took a lot of heat for taking him (and deservedly so – I was praying the Giants wouldn’t take him at pick 29, and then he goes in the top 10), but has he outperformed expectations? On the bright side, at least you effectively ruined Michael Crabtree’s career

"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09

by cjmulrain on Oct 6, 2009 10:54 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

McFadden's been such a letdown

He’s certainly been hindered by a bad offensive line and injuries since he came into the league and one can’t overlook those factors in evaluating his disappointing career until now. But when he has been healthy, he’s been decidedly underwhelming with the exception of maybe 2 games.

He won’t break tackles and goes down as soon as the first arm is laid on him. That’s no way to play running back. That explosiveness and dynamic character he expected from him on the field has been nowhere to be found. Too early to call him a bust yet, obviously, but the signs up until now aren’t hopeful.

As for DHB, it’s difficult to say how much has been his directly fault and how much has been the fault of the atrocious passing game. Plus, I think he’s been woefully misused. Last week was the first time they used his speed on a reverse and it netted over 20 yards. Up until then it was always just go routes and deep posts. No quick outs or anything.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

that second paragraph

sounds like you could have copied and pasted a Saints fan when talking about Reggie Bush. Not encouraging. I never really liked McFadden in college, but I feel bad for the Raiders so I was hoping he wouldn’t be a bust.

"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09

by cjmulrain on Oct 6, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe the DMcF injury is a blessing in disguise.

Hopefully they’ll use Mike Bush more. He did pretty well in the Denver game with some limited carries and catching balls out of the backfield and I was surprised he was only used sparingly after that.

by Lucky7 on Oct 6, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll chime in on McFadden

As a Raider fan (and an A’s fan) I cringe every time I see the Raiders take the field in Oakland the first month of the season because of dirt baseball infield that covers over half the field. Have you ever tried playing football on hard dirt? It sucks. It also makes it hard for offensive linemen to get a push and difficult for RBs (and WRs) to run hard because it’s easy to slip. I remember watching one of the home games this year and seeing McFadden literally tip-toeing as he was trying to run on the infield dirt. Watch the Raiders in the next few weeks and see what happens with the offensive line. And watch McFadden as he comes back and gets to play on real grass. He might do better in that regard.

To address McFadden’s (in)ability to break through tackles, I’ve actually seen a lot more running with force from DMC than I did last year. Specifically, I believe against the Chiefs this year he really lowered his pads ran into a couple defenders and picked up a few extra yards. He has had a few runs like this, but he has also had plenty where he hasn’t shown quite the power you want from a RB. He’s making progress, but he certainly hasn’t made it easy on Russell to throw the ball. The running game has been entirely stifled since the first half of the SD game in week 1.

Visit my sports blog: Triple Slash Sports

by nobodyinparticular on Oct 9, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

note to Sheridan:

Watch the reverse

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Oct 6, 2009 11:09 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Raybin, good stuff going on here

My questions are focused on your coach. Regarding Roger "GOD"ell’s personal conduct rules, do you think the Raiders could have the first coach to be suspended by the commish? Who gets the first piece of him, the law or the commish? What do the players, fans, and other coaches fell about Tom Cable?

by njgiant on Oct 6, 2009 2:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The law gets the first swing at Cable

If you’ll pardon the pun. :)

If charges are filed, then Cable is in big trouble with the league. If not, I can’t see much more than a fine and a short suspension. The league sent out a statement the other day implying that since Cable is a first time offender regarding the personal conduct policy, they’d probably go easy. All that goes out the window if he’s actually brought to trial, though.

As for what I think of Cable? I don’t know. I think he’s doing the best he can with what he’s got. He seems like a good guy and decent coach. He’s plainly beyond his depth as a play caller though and I question his use of personnel.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

this thread would draw more traffic and have more comedic potential

if it was called “Ask a Black Dude”
wasn’t there a skit on SNL like that in the past?

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Oct 6, 2009 2:26 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

You're the first one to get that reference

It’s a play on the “Ask a Black Dude” segment with Paul Mooney from Chappelle’s Show.

by Raybin on Oct 6, 2009 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Those were some funny skits

Talk about pushing the envelope. Mooney is off his rocker.

by njgiant on Oct 6, 2009 8:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hi Raybin

Thanks for taking the time to talk to us Giants fans.

I am flying over from England to go to the game on Sunday with a friend who got the tickets, but who happens to be a Raider fan as well.

All the signs point to a lopsided victory, but you know games do not go as planned plus I will feel bad for my friend (who is taking me to the airport after the game).

Where do you think the Raiders have an edge in any of the match ups on Sunday?

by G Fan in England on Oct 6, 2009 3:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I can think of one matchup where the Raiders have an advantage

Our secondary versus your receivers. I think the sky is the limit for Nicks, Manningham and especially Smith, but I don’t think any one of them can credibly compete with Nnamdi at this point. Chris Johnson had an off game against Houston but is usually very dependable and I think he could blanket Manningham or Nicks very effectively.

The problem comes with our third corner, Stanford Routt, who sucks. However, I’d look for him to get help from Michael Huff when he’s on the field.

Oh and our kicker and punter are better than yours. :-)

Other than that..oh boy. Matchup wise, it don’t look good for us. I think our defensive line vs. your offensive line could be considered even IF all our d-linemen play at full speed. Otherwise that goes to you too.

by Raybin on Oct 7, 2009 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wouldn't be so sure about the punter

Jeff Feagles might just be the best punter in NFL history. He doesn’t have a booming leg, but it’s definitely the most accurate leg. You will almost never see a shank or a touchback, and if he’s punting from anywhere near mid field, expect to start your drive inside the 10 if you’re lucky, inside the 5 if you’re not.

"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09

by cjmulrain on Oct 7, 2009 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, not exactly

I think Feagles produces a shank once every three years.

by hopeforthefuture3 on Oct 7, 2009 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks

How will the Raiders cope if the Giants play a 5-2-4 formation on early downs to stop the run and get to Russell. This would mean the OT in one on one with Tuck and Osi, so they will need RB or TE help

Will your WR’s be able to get open or the line block long enough for them to get deep.

If Carr starts then I think the game has the potential to be closer than I would like!

by G Fan in England on Oct 7, 2009 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How will the Raiders cope?

Chances are..not too well, if at all. If I’m the Giants, that exactly the defensive scheme I run.

If Carr starts, I don’t think the game will turn into a blowout. Even if the Raider “D” and the Giant “O” neutralize each other (the best result we in silver and black can hope for), I just don’t see how our offense, lacking two offensive line starters, our best receiver and Darren McFadden can get over or around or through your defense.

by Raybin on Oct 7, 2009 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks again

for your candid response on your team.

I remember the Giants using that formation against the Bears in the 1990 playoffs and winning 31-3!

I hope the Raiders can turn it around, but where do you start the Owner, the coaches or the players!

Hope we get a chance to chat again.

by G Fan in England on Oct 7, 2009 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Formation vs. the Raiders' offense

Again, as a Raider fan, I will chime in on this. Knowing the energy and physicality that the Giants’ front line brings to the defense, I don’t think it matters what defensive front the Giants bring. As Raybin mentioned, the Raiders are missing 2 starting linemen and another of the starters is playing out of position (Chris Morris moving from center to guard).

The only way that I don’t see this game being absolutely dominated by the Giants’ defense is if the NY front line comes out entirely flat. If they think this is an easy win and don’t show much effort, only then do I see this being an interesting ballgame. Otherwise, this is going to be entirely dominated by your D.

Visit my sports blog: Triple Slash Sports

by nobodyinparticular on Oct 9, 2009 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Raybin..

my Uncle has always been a Raider fan. I’ll never know how a man from NY can become such a die-hard Raider fan.

So I actually am a bit of a Raider fan. They really have nothing to do with the Giants until these games every few years, so I follow them a bunch.

I was surprised at your mention of Mario Henderson as you unheralded player. I would have been certain you were gonna mention Zach Miller.

The few games I watched the Raiders so far, he really stood out. I’m really surprised how they don’t use him more as a safety valve for JRuss…tho from what I’ve seen of him he has no idea what a safety valve is.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 6, 2009 6:23 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I almost said Miller

But I’ve actually heard a few things about Miller in the media as compared to zilch for Henderson.

Miller is awesome. No two ways about it. He can block and catch just about anything JaMarcus throws his way. He had a minor concussion, but says he’ll be good to go against you guys. I certainly hope so.

by Raybin on Oct 7, 2009 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I have a few questions for all you Giant fans...

How has Carr looked as a Giant?

What are you attributing to Jacobs low per carry average? And are you happy with the o-line play?

What is the defense’s biggest weakness?

Wherever I go, that's where I am.

by noontide on Oct 6, 2009 7:53 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Carr has looked pretty good in preseason.

Dredful in his mop-up duty in a few games this season. He probably would do fine, like the Vikings game last season he started, if he got 1st team reps in practice the week of the game.

Jacobs is fine. Tony Siragusa started this and its way blown out of proportin. The guy had 90+ punishing yards on 20+ carries in each game. The only thing that’s missing is Jacobs springing for a 30 or 40 yarder…which would give him the 130yards or so that would pass the eye test.

He’s doing nothing out of the ordinary other wise. He’s fine.

As for the D’s biggest weekness? The first 2 weeks showed a suspect run-D, tho while our last 2 opponents arent’ very good, they both have decent running games and they were completely shut down.

The pass D is #1 in teh league so far, so that’s not it.

Id say its the injuries, tho that is gonna be a strenght as the season goes on. ALl the young guys like Bruce Johnson and even vets who wouldn’t see much time, but are, like Chase Blackburn and CC Brown, are getting valuable reps in actual games.

Injures are the only real weakness of this team overall. And that’s just in the present. In the future, once all these guys come back, its gonna be a strength.

The only ‘bad injury’ is the rookie Clint Sintim and that’s cuz a rook not playing cuz of injury (and not practicing too…) is not really gonna help his career.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 6, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

you wouldn't classify Kenny Phillips as a "bad injury?"

also, Carr didn’t start the game against Minnesota, Eli did. I think he played the whole first half, though I could be mistaken about that

"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09

by cjmulrain on Oct 6, 2009 9:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well in terms of hurting the team

and the fact he’s on IR, yea its a bad injury, but no quotation marks.

Kenny Phillips knows what he’s doing out there. He played every game as far as I know as a rook, so I think he knew how to play in the NFL, he was just attempting to become an elite safety.

Clint Sintim is a bad injury cuz its the type that can make him be a bust before he ever steps on the field. He’s a rook, but I know he’d be out there playing. He keeps missing time, all this not playing is gonna hurt him in the long run.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 7, 2009 7:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm wondering

if the same effects’ll be felt to a lesser degree by Nicks

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Oct 7, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'll try this one

Carr has looked a little antsy in the pocket at times. Seems that he still doesn’t have faith in a good O line. Maybe still traumatized from his Houston days.

Jacobs carry average can be a direct reflection of teams still stacking the box. Look for this to change with the emergance of Swiss and Ham (there Free, I’m starting to use your name). As far as our o line, yeah, we’re happy with them. These guys are as solid as they come.

So far our biggest weakness on defense has been our health. We just can’t seem to get everyone healthy at the same time (case in point, Boley just had knee surgery today and is out up to six weeks).

by njgiant on Oct 6, 2009 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Check out NFL take on Athlete tragedies

http://tightend.blogspot.com/

"Don't Be Afraid to Stand on a Pile of 'No's' for one 'Yes'"

by curiousg87 on Oct 6, 2009 11:57 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Dude

Spamming this like 5 times in the thread? That is incredibly annoying and makes me not want to read it.

by brisulph on Oct 7, 2009 7:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

its George Wrighster

He of the pimped out training camp golf cart.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 7, 2009 8:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Being of a certain celebrity

does not excuse you of the rules or common courtesy. He is spamming, plain and simple.

by brisulph on Oct 7, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

no

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Oct 7, 2009 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If this guy

Continues to only spam this site, I feel he should be removed.

GO Giants!

by wangstu13 on Oct 7, 2009 11:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

yea

the method of posting wasn’t great, but it’s actually a really cool blog. I recommend checking it out

"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09

by cjmulrain on Oct 7, 2009 6:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

From a visiting Raiders fan

So they’re saying that they’re not going to decide whether Manning is starting until game time. Why would they take a chance on aggravating his injury in what will probably be one of your easiest games of the year? Why not just play Carr?

Because believe me, you have nothing to worry about this week. Before the Broncos game there was some inter-divisional trash-talking going on. Before the Texans game, there was some careful optimism in our camp, but I doubt any of us have any illusions this week. Raybin mentioned the injuries on top of everything else that has been a problem. Really, the only way it’s going to be a game is if the Giants decide the Raiders are worth a full effort and slack off.

by rightnasty on Oct 9, 2009 11:19 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I saw your injury report.

Tough stuff, we’re in the same shape.
To answer your question: First, a regular season game is a game no matter whom it’s against and they all weigh equally. Coughlin and his staff and the team don’t have our fan’s attitude that the game is a gimme. Therefore, they are putting their best team who can play on the field.
More specifically, the type of injury Eli is dealing with is not one that is very likely to impede his mechanics, nor become especially aggravated by game play. It recovers with rest, and Eli got rest this week. It’s not a surgical issue, it’s a rehab issue, a condition, and the chances of aggravation do not outweigh the impetus on winning the game. At this point I’d say it’s 90% likely Eli starts.
Two side notes: First, to declare Eli out if he truly cannot play could necessitate the signing of Rhett Bomar from the practice squad, bumping someone else off the roster and, from my limited understanding, could result in the loss of Bomar upon his re-demotion.
Lastly, you don’t make the sort of announcement: Eli’s iffy, we’re going to play Carr because it’s just the Raiders — that’s the kind of bulletin board material that could induce the Raid’s best performance of the year.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Oct 10, 2009 12:16 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let me ask you one more thing

You know, around Raiders forums the number one topic is quarterback change these days, so I’d thought about the various changes that have happened around the league in recent years, as I anticipate Gradkowski taking over soon.

Now you see the Cowboys twice a year. The change from Bledsoe to Romo definitely made them a better team, but yet has brought some different problems too. Do you think Romo is the thing holding them back from going to the Super Bowl? Or are the Cowboys just lacking something?

by rightnasty on Oct 10, 2009 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know what Simms is gonna answer...

but I know that the main thing holding them back is Wade Phillps and on top of that Jerry Jones.

Wade Phillips has been a horrible head coach wherever he’s been. As a DC? He might be one of the best in the game, but as a HC he’s just a waste.

Jerry Jones should not be able to buy the groceries for them either. They need a GM. The only reason the Cowboys are any good is cuz there are a ton of Bill Parcells players (damn near everyone actually…aside from maybe Choice and Felix Jones and Martellus Bennett) still there.

Romo is not holding them back either. He’s just asked to do way too much.

Every time I watch the Cowboys, even against the Giants, I wonder why the hell they don’t just line up and run teh ball every play? Their O-Line is huge and very good run blockers….it just doesn’t seem to make all that much sense to pass as much as they do.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 10, 2009 8:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

...and the Cowboys are

set up for returning to true mediocrity (if they aren’t there already), cuz the Parcells guys are aging and Jerry has drafted like crap so they have no real relevant replacements.

That’s enough Cowboy talk for the year tho. F em.

What the f$%k is the internet?

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 10, 2009 8:02 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yo FB

as much of a bigmouth as I am, you save me about half my comments by saying exactly what I would have

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Oct 12, 2009 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

sorry....

..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...

...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.

---Carl

by FreeBradshaw on Oct 13, 2009 7:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh heh

Didn’t think it’d be quite that bad. But, well played by the Giants. Bradshaw was incredible. Don’t take offense when I say I hope not to see you guys next year :)

by rightnasty on Oct 12, 2009 12:11 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

good luck in the future

the NFL is a better league when the Raiders are good, so it’s sad to see them like this. Hopefully Al Davis wisens up a bit and realizes the game has passed him by and hires someone to run the football operations.

"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09

by cjmulrain on Oct 12, 2009 3:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Fail_small
BBV week 11 pool
Thefalcoholic_small
Ask The Falcoholic!

Recent FanPosts

Header_logo_small
Antonio Pierce Out!!
Small
AP out with neck injury
New_york_giants_logo_small
What are the chances...
Zoo_080_small
hey guys
_1avatar_small
Glimmers of Hope
Small
3-4?
_1avatar_small
Whoah
New_york_giants_9a02_small
Should we be resting Bradshaw?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Mobile Live
Eagles shuffle linebackers again
Mobile Live
The VRR: Redskins (3-6) @ Cowboys (6-3)
Mobile Live
Antonio Pierce out indefinitely

SPONSORS

Get Your Giants' Gear


Editor-In-Chief

Bigblueview_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Blueshirt_banter_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Authors

Tyree_believe_small cjmulrain

Moderators

Small brisulph