Notes & quotes from a disappointing night
Here are a few more thoughts and reactions to Sunday night's 24-17 loss by our New York Giants to the Arizona Cardinals.
- I think we can argue about whether Brandon Jacobs should have played more. I think he should have, but I am still not going to kill offensive coordinator Kevin Gilbride. For the second straight week, there were plays to be made by the offense, and they simply did not get it done. Particularly, the wide receivers. Here is center Shaun O'Hara, largely summarizing my own thoughts.
"In the NFL you have to make plays where there are plays to be made. We are not playing the football that we know we can play. It is frustrating. You work hard all week to win games. And to not win at home and in this fashion, obviously we are very disappointed." - Eli Manning admitted that the Giants offense could simply never find a rhythm.
"We did struggle from the get-go, just being consistent. Getting first downs, moving the ball, we never really had any long drives where we were running it and throwing it, mixing and matching, and getting consistent. We have to give credit to them for doing a good job. We had too many third and longs and not enough positive plays," Manning said. "Not enough situations where you as a quarterback are just finding your rhythm in the passing game or the running game and just getting up there and getting a lot of plays. There were too many three and outs and it was just not consistent football.
"I don’t think we have to get concerned. We have to play better football. We have to get back to just being consistent, finding our rhythm, playing the way that we started the season. Just making some plays and throwing the ball down the field. We haven’t hit our big plays that we were hitting earlier in the season." - Coach Tom Coughlin was forthright in pinning this loss on the offense.
"You have to play very, very well in all three phases to have a chance to win any game. We have had a couple of situations where one side or the other has not played as well as we possibly can play. What solves that is all three phases getting back in sync and playing well together again. This week it was the offense that didn’t play well, wasn’t in sync, didn’t really have any rhythm for quite some time. ... Not enough consistency at all."
"I am always concerned when you lose. I am not sure what that word means but there are a lot of things that need to be addressed. I still say we have a good group of young men in the locker room. They want to do well, they want to play well, they have good attitudes, they work hard. For whatever reason, we have had two weeks in a row where one particular area has not performed very well. So, back to the drawing board."
Cardinals vs Giants coverage
Cardinals vs Giants recap
Cardinals vs Giants boxscore
Revenge Of The Birds
79 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
problems this season
OK, it is still early and we are still 5-2 but these last 2 weeks weren’t just ‘a couple of losses’ they were disasters. In the Saints game, eventhough the Saints are clearly the real deal, our Giants were out coached on defense ( was there a defensive plan? why no adjustments?) and on offense – the Saints defense ran our offense better than we did and anticipated almost every move.
This week, again the defensive scheme was exposed, we actually allowed the Cards to develop a running game that they did not have before. On the offense side, how can Steve Smith get no throws for the entire first quarter? What is going on witht he thinking on the preparation?
The Cards came into the game with a stingy run defense and a porous passing defense. So, lets hit Smith and Boss in the seams to establish the pass, run Jacobs and options to bring in the corners and hit Manningham and Hicks.
I think that the new Defensive Coordinator is lost at sea. His defensive line is not schemed into getting to the quarterback, they arfe being picked up and neutralized. I mean how does Osi got zero tackles ????
Bad coaching and bad schemes on both ends of the ball is my verdict.
by smaugtheterrible on Oct 26, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions
Osi
C;mon, look back at Osi’s history. He has had many games during his career like last night, where he just doesn’t make any plays. That’s not an Sheridan. That’s on Osi. He just is not consistent enough. Right now, he is the third-best DE on this team.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 26, 2009 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Osi...
passed up on 2 sure sacks this year because he tried to get cute and strip the ball….
i swear that TD return by him vs Washington was a BAD thing because that’s all he does now….
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
I saw that as well
one of them was the sack by Nuke. Osi was up shaking his head instead of celebrating a huge stop by the D.
Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!
by bigbluethruandthru on Oct 26, 2009 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions
no adjustments at all...
There is no Backup plan with this team…when something is not working they don’t change it, they just try again, and again, and again…
2 passes to boss.
13 carries for Jacobs.
and no knowledge whatsoever on how to run an effective screen pass.
this team has problems….that are fixable, but they refuse to fix them.
that zone D that sheridan is running is laughable…i saw Webster covering two guys at one point….and that was when they had 5 guys playing in the secondary.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Manning said it all
We never got drives going – well you don’t when you run it on first and second down and throw it deep on 3rd down!
What we need to do is get the ball control long drives going so the defence has to respect the underneath stuff so you have a chance at the deep stuff later – but until you have the defence looking short the long stuff fails unless you get lucky (yes you Mr Nicks).
The second consideration of the three and outs is that the defence is not getting a rest and whilst the DL is not at full strenghth they are getting tired like last year.
So let’s forgot the bombs away on 3rd and 2 and play move the chain football!
by G Fan in England on Oct 26, 2009 11:40 AM EDT reply actions
you know...
i asked Ed before the season if we could expect another 33 catch season from Boss…
and it looks like that’s the game plan with KG calling plays…
if a guy is good enough to trust in the 4th quarter, well guess what Kevin, he’s good enough to trust the entire game. he should be abusing teams on those short 3rd downs….forget throwing the ball to Hedgecock already.
This is a great team w/ horrible coaching…I’m sorry to say it and I know i’m gonna catch flack…but when Eli is missing, you reel him in and run the ball or throw short…you don’t ask him to throw long.
No adjustments at all…by the time Sheridan finally caught on but it was too damn late.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
i was really wondering
about that short pass to hedgecock…that play literally never works. why in the world is it still in the playbook?
As I have said many times before
Hedge has an undeserved bad rep. The throws to him are typically cruddy, and that is not what you do when you throw to a FB. That said, dropping that pass in favour of giving Boss more touches is something I would be down with.
well ur right about the pass being a bad one...
but that is one play that needs to find it’s way outta the play book….even w/ a perfect pass that play is good for like 3 yards…and that’s if Hedgecock is able to bring it in.
the truth of the matter is, w/ Bradshaw, Boss, and Beckum in the lineup why does that pass go to Hedgecock?!?!
as far as i’m concerned that’s a decoy play you draw up once on the goalline to try to fool someone and that’s about it.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Eli
Was missing his reads all night..Hence the throw to Hedgecock..Eli had a really bad night last night..and I blame the calls in from the sideline..He has enough to worry about than to deal with a play call that has no chance to start with…then he is forced to figure something else out quickly.
meh
a fullback isn’t a halfback for a very good reason. if eli is missing those passes, then use hedgecock for what he’s supposed to be used for: blocking. otherwise why not run bradshaw and jacobs in the same backfield and use one as a decoy and use the other as a screen. bring back the t wing!
Slants and play action.
quick passes. If we’re gonna pass over giving it to Jacobs, then at least let them be high percentage stuff.
On the passing to Hedgecock, I think Eli’s getting rattled a bit and not realizing that he has more time.
I don’t think its a pass they’re planning to do, its actually more like a throwaway pass.
To which…I ask why the MF is Hedgecock not in there blocking?
Beat hte Eagles, I don’t care about the 1-2 thing…..
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
yes....
simplify the plays when you see that there is not that much separation…or when you see Eli is having trouble w/ accuracy.
I think the throw to Hedgecock is literally a decoy to set somethign up later…but still, why not put Boss in there or Beckum…or even Bradshaw?!?!
but your right…help Eli out a little bit when you see him struggling…don’t air it out down the field.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Hedge
I really believe Hedgecock is the first read on that play. The ball comes out quick to him. Even if he does catch it, it’s a 3 yard gain. But, even when Eli puts it on the money he drops it. I want the play out of the playbook, but if Gilbride refuses then why not at least put Beckum in as an H-Back and run it with somebody who can catch the ball and make a play after the catch?
It's hard to play defense
without linebackers or safeties. We could REALLY use some help from the Walking Wounded.
The offense wouldn’t have to worry as much about “finding a rhythm” if the defense kept giving them a short field. But you guys have already made most of the points that need to be made: Defensive play calling = bad. Offensive play calling = less-than-great.
WRs need to make plays.
Speaking of which – did Ramses Barden hit Coughlin’s car or something? Steal Eli’s lunch? I just fail to see why we don’t TRY the ol “Throw It To The Really Tall Guy” play.
Anyway, no panic…but let’s get to work.
I left my swagger in my other pants.
I was at the game, my thoughts...
1. Feagles looks old if you need him to put the ball into the corner at the 10 yard line he is your man, but he can no longer kick the ball down the field for 50 or 60 yards.
2.Jacobs needs to get the ball more. Bradshaw only need to come in and get the ball 10 or less times per game. Let Jacobs be the work horse he is.(ohh and yes he isnt slamming into guys everytime he gets the ball now) He has matured a little bit and looks like he wants to play int he league for a while and you dont do that by finishing off every play with a full power hit into another player.
3.If i had to place this loss on anyone player it would be Feagles. I dunno if TV coverage showed this but after every bad kick he was shaking his head and saying something to the Ref like he wanted some kind of penalty. I like the guy but if you remmber in the preseason he was looking really fat and had a huge gut. It looks like he lost a few pounds before the season started but i think his age is finally catching up with him. Might be worth it if possible to bring in a young punter to punt for distance and keep Feagles the rest of the season for coffin kicks.
Has this team lost it's identity, offensively and defensively?
There’s a reason this offense has no consistency, or for the worse, the consistency of what they give you. The Giants are only mixing and matching a couple few plays, on any given down for the entire game!
A simple run between the tackles or an ill advised draw play. There’s our running game! A dink-or-dunk pass to the sideline for the WR and hope he gains considerable YAC! Or, the “stack the box” and Eli will check-off to something deep down either sideline or deep middle, for a low percentage of success! While i’m at it, the screen!
Not too hard to game plan if your an opposing DC, if you ask me.
Defensively, well it did have a pulse against the Cards, but seemed pedestrian. I believe there was time in the game and Sheridan went back to the vanilla rush four only and Warner had time to start his grocery list! IMO, though we did blitz more, it was nothing that Warner hasn’t seen before! As far as i’m concerned, Sheridan seems hesitant to blitz, a far cry from what was advertised as he was suppose to add a twist to this unit? The Cards, actually didn’t have a problem showing Eli a look or two, for the most part.
But for some reason, why is it that a handful of fans (from a blog) seem to recognize this, but these guy’s are paid 7 figures to appease the masses and in the process, they don’t seem to have a clue with their failures, but it’s still the same?
I’m not going to jump off the ledge, but there seems to be too many inconsistencies that can be corrected that we know, but the trust we have, is now in question!
Giant problems - Loyalty and Hubris
I posted these same thoughts after the Saints game and a few people got it. Here’s what I think are the two main problems and they are, to me, deep problems that go to the core of Coughlin and his coordinators and how they approach the game. First, Coughlin is loyal to his people. Loyalty, in and of itself, a good character trait, a nice thing to have and respect. But in a football coach, nah, maybe not so good. TC is loyal to Gilbride and Sheridan. Gilbride has yet to incorporate 3 weapons that would open up this offense and make us less predictable – screens or flares to the backs, play action, and some more balls thrown to Kevin Boss who clearly can make plays. When we do see any of these, infrequently, they tend to work. We win in spite of Gilbride. Gilbride is TC’s guy and he clearly refuses to see past his loyalty to a man who the game has clearly passed by. Sheridan is clearly overmatched and over his head in his new job. Neither the offense nor the defense is any good at making adjustments (yes, it has happened but rarely) and the game-planning is atrocious. So yes, loyalty is killing us. As for hubris, the classical Greek sin of pride, for me this comes into play in the very way the Giants under TC approach the game. Yes, we’d like to impose our will on both sides of the ball. But it’s almost as if TC and his brain-trust think that this can be done without planning as to who the opponent is – whoever they are they will adjust to the Giants imposing our will. And this leads to stagnation and a complete and utter lack of innovation on offense and defense. In the past two games against quality opponents (yes, the Cards were in the Super Bowl last year) the Giants have looked like a team from another era playing teams from the here and now using everything, certainly on offense, at their disposal. The Giants should be wearing throwback uniforms all the time they look so out of place in 2009. None of us mind boring when we win. But the 5-2 Giants are boring, predictable, and lack, from the very top, TC and his coordinators, a way to adjust on the fly and to plan ahead for those adjustments. They simply refuse to use the tools that are out there at their disposal. They will impose “Giants football” on their opponents. Well, that may work against bottom-feeders but it sure doesn’t work against good teams. Considering we have a great GM in Reese, I am very worried about not just this team this year, but this team as long as TC and his coordinators are running the on-field stuff. For me, the game has clearly passed them by and we need a massive overhaul of the head coach and his staff. I think with the talent we have that is the only answer.
by nybaseballgiants on Oct 26, 2009 2:49 PM EDT reply actions
Lookout!!
Ed doesn’t like to pile on Gilbride.
See back to THIS POST (and notice the date on it; one month ago – Sept 26th) where I BEG for screen passes, play action – really ANYTHING from Gilbride.
I’m sorry – but the offense is CLEARLY the problem here. The defense fought an uphill battle against a very good ’Zona offense that had good field position all night. But Brandon Jacobs averaged 5.8 yards per carry, but only ran 13 times. … 40 pass attempts, 26 runs. AND – three of the first four times the Giants were 3rd-and-short last night they tried to pass!! WTF! Maybe Eli checked out of something, but still – 3rd and 2 and Eli goes into the shotgun? Really?
I’m sorry but at some point the finger just has to be pointed at Gilbride. I just don’t get why he’s getting a pass right now. I don’t understand why everyone is unwilling to lay some of the blame on to him. I know that the easiest argument is, “Oh the players on the field have to execute” – but when you look at the offense, it’s pretty clear to me that the players simply can’t execute on what has proven to be a flawed strategy thus far. Something needs to be changed up on “O” or we’re going to have this conversation every single week.
cody k, i agree
the finger must be pointed at gilbride. and then the same finger must be pointed at coughlin who is ultimately responsible. he signs off on these game plans.
by nybaseballgiants on Oct 26, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions
Gilbride
Criticizing KG is OK. My problem is when people aren’t willing to give him any credit for the good things the Giants have done. Thus far this season offense has not been the Giants problem — until last night.
I hate criticism that says ‘He sucks because he called that play.’ Or, ‘we win in spite of him.’ That’s just stupid. Every coordinator makes calls during a game that are questionable. Debating the philosophy is a whole different matter, and that is something we can do.
I certainly have some issues with the way the last two games were called offensively.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 26, 2009 6:11 PM EDT up reply actions
ah....
aka Joe Girardi effect.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 26, 2009 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions
YES!!
Ed! Finally! Some tacit admission that Gilbride’s been calling a flawed game!!
Ahhhh – a revelation!
I say all of this tongue-in-cheek, mind you.
However: I’ve been in the anti-Gilbride camp for quite some time now (ie the last 12 months). And, akin to Girardi, I think that often the talent on the playing field overshadows the faulty and questionable strategies called for from the coaches.
Gilbride can’t seem to get out of his own way. He just seems lost most of the time and it seems like as soon as it becomes obvious that things are not working, Gilbride lacks any real ability to adjust to what the defense is doing and go with it.
For example: when a team brings constant pressure and stacks the box, the O needs to do things like, go no-huddle, call screen passes, quick slants, etc. Not so with Gilbride. “Game plan not working? Screw it, I’m going to dial-up a 7 step drop for Eli and go deep. Again.”
and the Girardi/Gilbride effect is just what you said...
yet because the guy is good at what he does, he wins with the talent he has. Girardi gets even more overshadowed of course…but its NEVER 100% the coach at I think that like Ed, THAT is what gets me. I don’t like that sort of thinking at all.
Yea, the coach is part of the blame for bad things, but so is the player…probably more so the player.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 26, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Exactly
No matter what the call if you execute what you are supposed to do it should work. My problem with killing the coordinators right now is the Giants — on both sides of the field — are leaving a lot of makeable plays out there. Plays they are in position to make, and aren’t.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 26, 2009 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions
If I may....
sometimes it’s not always the play calls and the execution…it’s the overall decision making
It’s Jacobs only getting 13 carries…
Boss getting thrown to twice…
Yes, Eli made some questionable throws, yes Manningham dropped a TD, Yes there were 4 TO’s.
But I think we can all admit that before the season started we wanted to see more production out of Boss and more production from our RB’s in the passing game, and so far we haven’t…and that you can’t chalk up to execution…it’s coaching and game planning.
I’m not agreeing or disagreeing w/ anyone…
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Ed, I'm disappointed
I said above that we win “in spite of Gilbride.” I don’t think that is stupid as you so indelicately put it. The Yankees of the 50s won in spite of Casey Stengel as has been documented in many books about the dynasty. The Yankees of Girardi also tend to win games in spite of him and his questionable managing and the handling of his pitchers is also written about constantly. That’s just two examples from our local baseball team. Give me a few minutes I’ll come up with many, many more and all of them valid and validated from a historical perspective. Go back and read accounts of the Super Bowl winning Cowboys under Barry Switzer. They won it all in spite of him. It happens. It isn’t stupid and I say it is happening now.
by nybaseballgiants on Oct 27, 2009 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions
its wrong.
plain and simple.
Girardi has made plenty of good moves. The bullpen would be gasping on the floor like dying fish, like they were the past few years with Torre.
I don’t like knocking Torre either….but how come no one says the Yanks won in spite of him? They won in spite of Torre as much as their winning in spite of Girardi. Every good team wins in spite of their manager….the manager isn’t totally responsible for everything.
He plays a part and deserves credit for it, be it bad OR GOOD.
I’ve seen the Giants march down the field many times like its nothing with Gilbride. No one gives him credit for it, actually they say things like a screen pass that gains 20 yards was “luck”.
Give credit where its due. Other coaches or OC’s, like Dallass or the Chargers OC, have failed to get more out of “more talented” rosters.
Gilbride is a good OC. He isn’t my favorite, but I remember who we had as an OC before him…..and sometimes the grass isn’t always greener.
Live with it. We won a Bowl with this guy (and in the WS with Girardi).
Just cuz the papers and yahoo-sports write about something like they’re winning in spite of them…doesn’t mean that its correct either.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 27, 2009 6:42 AM EDT up reply actions
so which way is it?
Either “its wrong. plain and simple.” OR “Every good team wins in spite of their manager…” Can’t have it both ways. I’m ultimately saying that to me this Giants team, in order to get the most out of this roster from 1-53, needs a major overhaul in coaching philosophy, coaching preparedness and coaching ability to change. Believe what you want.
by nybaseballgiants on Oct 27, 2009 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions
its wrong
cuz you’re saying that the Giants simple win in spit of Gilbride (and the Yanks win simply in spite of Girardi).
I’m saying, NO MANAGER has so much of an effect that him being there makes the team be bad right away.
Gilbride is better than 90% of OC’s out there, Girardi better 90% of manager’s out there.
The Giants and Yankees win no more in spite of their manager than anyone else. That’s what I meant with that.
If the decision sucks and the team makes it work..the guy’s a genius anyway. If he make a good call and it backfires? He’s an idiot.
Change the philosophy? Preparedness? Now you’re talking about firing TC…and that is wrong too.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 27, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Labour Day in New Zealand
Well, it was Labour Day in New Zealand yesterday. That meant a day off work … and ESPN were showing the Giants-Cards game live (1.30pm), and the sun was shining. That’s where the fun ended! I don’t get to see the Giants often, except highlights, but if yesterday was a ‘regular’ performance then I can see why. The Cards were amazing, their D-Line was intimidating and solid. BJ made a couple of good penetrations, but generally there was little space. Their pass coverage easily outshone the Giants WRs, who were generally poor at running their routes. The Giants pass rush was weak … ‘nearly getting there’ is not the same thing as ‘getting there’. Yes, Warner got knocked down, but he got the ball away first. I fully agree with previous posts that the G-Men appeared to have no plan-B, in any department. No plan-B about how to ramp up the pressure on Warner, no plan-B about dealing with the excellent Cardinals blitz pressure, no plan-B about how to progress the ball … 1 or 2 3rd-downs in the second half is simply not acceptable. Senior players need to take a long look in the mirror, but the numbskulls calling the plays need to get better prepared .. and quickly. Did they not expect the blitz pressure from the Cards? The same thing happened last week vs Saints. Surely one of the defining characteristics of sentient life it the ability to learn from past experience. Simply living in the past (2007) will not cut it.
Replace the coaching staff?
Have we forgotten that we won the whole thing just 2 seasons ago with this coach? I do agree that we need to change some things and I have confidence that TC will do just that, its October and now is the time to to work these things out, I’d rather peak in January, let the Saints own September and October, it’s who’s left standing at the end.
So lets not panick just yet, remember now that everyone thinks we suck we can get back to having a chip on our shoulder and playing Giants football!
by BigBlueCrew_jfl on Oct 26, 2009 3:03 PM EDT reply actions
Just parts of the staff
I think Arizona set a pretty good precedent by firing their defensive coordinator after going to the Super Bowl. It shows that just because you went to the Super Bowl doesn’t mean there aren’t areas for improvement. I think that Gilbride needs to start showing improvement soon. For all the talent on this team (QB, RBs, OL), we should be putting the ball in the end zone a lot more consistently.
Snap Count (Omaha)
The Giants also need to realize that the fans and announcers knew what Omaha meant in their snap count, and it was obvious that Arizona did too. They were getting a great jump off of the ball because every team Eli says “Omaha”, it means that the next “Hut” out of his mouth means to snap the ball. This has been ongoing, but hopefully now that it is so obvious it will get fixed.
Agree wholeheartedly
And while we’re at it, can we get a F#$%&ING FIX to these simply ridiculous “Delay of Game” penalties?
Maybe I’m missing something, but how is this still a problem? How can the coaching staff not put themselves in a position to remedy this same mistake that happens over and over yearin, year-out? And how can that be 100% Eli’s fault? He’s still got to get the play call earlier to be in a position to go through his progressions, etc.
cody k, once again, agree
and i’m so tired of eli pointing out each and every member of the defense and what they might do prior to every snap.
by nybaseballgiants on Oct 26, 2009 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Ummm...
half the teams in the league use “omaha”. Hell, even the cowboys use it. Just because someone on tv says something doesn’t make it true.
Watch the game
And you will see it is 100% true. Also, watch Arizona DEs get off the ball in the second half and this will confirm it.
Exactly
A couple times in the 4th, they were in so fast I thought the MUST be offsides, then I saw on the replay they weren’t. CC knew it. Same snap count on every damn play.
It has nothing to do with omaha.
The Giants have been doing that for the past 2 or 3 years or so. So you’re telling me that with all of the hours of tape that coaches watch it takes until some blowhard on TV says something for them to figure it out? Okay.
They may have been on the snap count but it had nothing to do with omaha despite the expert Collinsworth saying so. Teams have been on snap counts before – even without “omaha”.
I will believe you....
If you can please explain to me why Eli snapped the ball on “Hut” after EVERY “Omaha”. Validate your argument with an explanation.
More...
There is a page from Pats ’04 off playbook.
It seems to come from Pats O history, Hufnagel et al. Brady uses it. I’ve heard Romo do it.
Read some of the more knowledgeable comments
Basically it means
that the clock is winding down. Stop anymore shifting or motion. We’re snapping the ball soon. Many teams use it.
I'm not dumb
I know that “Omaha” has been used before. We use it every game. But I think it changes every game (just like signs in baseball). And in this particular game they happened to know our signal and got pressure because of it. I don’t understand what you are trying to defend here?
Teams have gotten other team's snap counts before
What I am say is it’s a matter of that nothing more. They got in a rut with the snap count. It happens. But Collinsworth and some Giants fans are acting like the Cards cracked the Davinci code.
I'm not saying it took a genius to figure it out
But someone on the Giants coaching staff should’ve seen that the Cards were getting off the ball faster than our linemen and done something about it.
you guys are all wrong
everybody knows Eli snaps every play as the play clock is going from 1 to 0. THAT’S the cue for defenses!
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 27, 2009 7:58 AM EDT up reply actions
please no more zone!!!
the cardinals defence really look like the giants D out there, not to mention for the past 2 games our offence has been exposed. basically bring saftys in the box and 1 on 1 press with our recivers. mark my words, we are going to be seeing that from opposing teams until we get it fixed. dont be surprised if the eagles do that to us next week, esipecally with their talented corners. as for sheridan? that man looks lost. at 1 point in the game i saw the giants have 3 down lineman and tuck was moving around the b gap and the c gap like he was a LB. i do like the 34 “teq” but we dident have the personal on the field to make it sucessful. tuck looked very very angry.
by old man strahan on Oct 26, 2009 3:36 PM EDT reply actions
you are right....
sheridan is lost and confused…i swear on when they play zone the secondary is totally lost.
i saw on one play Webster was left to cover two guys all by himself….
i don’t get it…reminded me of Fassel’s prevent Defense he used to run.
what’s even more scary is that Sheridan knew he had to blitz more, he knew he had to get pressure but instead he didn’t…until there were about 5 minutes left in the game.
what bothers me the most is that these problem can be fixed, they’re just refusing to fix them…
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
with you on this as well, old man
and don’t forget, we get the eagles on a short week (for them) as they’re playing monday night. we should be a day fresher. will we be any smarter in our planning???
by nybaseballgiants on Oct 26, 2009 3:45 PM EDT reply actions
NYBG
I was reading your comments about the coachign staff and you may or may not be right. But I think it’s a moot point because of the loyalty ownership has shown to coaches and this particular crew. I’m thinking it would take back-to-back losing seasons with this talent to begin their considering a change. I know there was some talk after 3 1-and-dones in the playoffs, but ultimately, they didn’t make a move, and that paid off. That’ll be in their minds for the next few seasons.
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 26, 2009 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Still early in the season
And we can still make some noise in the division and the playoffs — with that said TC is right, this team has a lot of work to do — The O looked worse this week than it did against the saints – I’m putting that on Gilbride and Eli. We all know about Gilbride but it seemed as if Eli would audible right into the cards D last night, which is not like him and they just did not execute well. Ball control, short passes, where was Beckum? I know he is unproven but why not give it a shot. Gilbride said he didn’t know Nicks looked faster with the ball than running routes, maybe there’s a surprise waiting if you try something else. The cards strength is their DB’s why not work on their LB ‘s . On the other hand the D for playing on a short field held the cards to 3/14 on third down, but when it counted they were not in position to make a play. I thought this was a man press blitzing team? Was the loss of KP really that big? I know Boley being out has made a difference in the match ups but even if he was in there I wouldn’t be surprised to see him in a zone defense covering air which has been happening the passed two weeks.
Zone....
Defense must be abolished.
w/ 5 minutes left in the Game it was like sheridan finally realized “oh crap” i gotta get to Warner…so what did he do, he put the secondary in Man coverage and rushed extra guys…and what did we do? Get the ball back.
it sounds simply i know, but we gotta get rid of this zone crap.
Kill the QB and let the corners do their job!!!
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
+1 Amen to that
Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!
by bigbluethruandthru on Oct 26, 2009 10:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I swear on everything wholly...
Webster was guarding 2 guys all by himself on one occasion….if Warner saw it it woulda been an easy TD.
and what about the blown coverage when Boldin was wide open in the endzone.
it’s clear this team can’t play zone coverage. Wake up Billy.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Ok so
I have to get on Gilbride a little bit more than I did
Rushing plays Cardinals (last in the NFL) 22 Giants (Power running team ? ) 26
Play our game
There have been a few posts on the theme of imposing the ‘Giants game’ on other team rather than trying to second guess the opposition. The advantage of this is playing to ones own strengths and making the opponents react, change, and make the mistakes. So here is the question … what is the Giants game? This team has been built on the run and powerful defence. The passing game is in its infancy at this time. I guess a couple more years will see Nicks, Smith and Manningham really show their potential. In the meantime the watchword is KISS … Keep It Simple Stupid! … run and tackle, run and tackle, run and tackle. How hard is that?
johanus, re:play our game
on offense, as we’ve seen the first 7 games with some exceptions, and i think you’ll agree, our OL (including the TE and the FB) has had a harder time controlling the line of scrimmage due to the fact that THEY’RE OUTNUMBERED cause teams are stacking 7-8 in the box. we’re not getting the push we were getting in years past and one only need look at jacobs’ much lower YPC to know that. and yes, he was tiptoeing cause the holes weren’t there as early as they once were. so with that being said, throw a screen, throw some slants, make those backers and safeties back off. and then the run opens up cause the OL may even have a numerical edge. but we can’t seem to do that. or even have it in our playbook. all of those plays are simple and have been run by teams for years. even our giants in years past. only not with this coaching regime. as for powerful defense, i love our DL and Webster, Phillips and Thomas in the D-backfield, but with the exception of Boley, who started for Atlanta for years, name a LBer who’d start for any other good team? the position on D that changed the game with the advent of our very own LT, and we have not got a single playmaker at that position. remember when the Broncos were losing the SB all the time? they had Karl Mecklenburg at LB and he was a terror in the AFC and then in the SB you never heard his name. we have a whole group of Mecklenburgs only they don’t terrorize anyone and we only hear they names when they f*** up. hopefully sintim can be that playmaker and boley too but until then, we’re missing a key element on D – linebackers.
by nybaseballgiants on Oct 26, 2009 5:38 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the Ofense has lost it's identity
They seem to be on a mission to prove that Eli and this young core of WR’s can light it up week after week. This O could not do that with Plax, Shockey, & Toomer. Bombs on third and short and to start the game. I think they are trying too hard to prove they can win by throwing the ball without Plax. I understand taking a couple of shots because guys are in man coverage and their are opportunities but sometimes it’s about moving the sticks and sustaining drives. Even if your not getting much with the Run because teams are gearing up to stop it let Jacobs where them down and put yourself in 3rd and 5 situations convert a few and as the game goes on you’ll were the oppenet down. All of these low percentage passes are giving downs away. Use your best and most relaible route runners and recievers Smith & Boss over the middle on 3rd and less than 8 and stop going for the TD all the time. I don’t know maybe it’s Eli being too much of a gambler, he has a history of that, or play selection but put some shorter passes in. How about a slant with Mario Manningham or Nix, Tommer and Plax ran those plays well. Maybe the learning curve with these younger guys is bigger than we think and the coaches are just letting them do what they do best which go deep, but Smith and Boss are reliable 8-12 yard guys that should be more involved on third down. When they won the SB it seemed as if in the playoffs they decided to simplify the O and run first and then let Eli convert third and short. Sure they took their shots but for the most part it was intermediate passing to the sticks to keep drives going and a lot of it was to possion guys like Smith and Toomer. Obviousely a lot of that was made easy by Plax being there but they still seemed to play within themsleves and were not hell bend on going bombs away. I love Eli but he’s not his brother and along with Gilbrith I think they see this young raw talent and speed with these WR’s and think they can become deep ball passing team. Even when Payton Manning won the Super Bowl he won it with a lot of short and intermediate passing to the RB’s and TE’s in the playoff wins. Go back to basics with Eli. Let him manage the game, take a few shots deep, and let him loose in the 2 minute drill late in the game if its close.
I’m scared for this game against Philly becasue you know Philly is going to play 8-9 guys up and blitz up the gut and I guarentee you the Giants open the game by passing the ball deep and I think the Giants will be out of Sync like they were last night and like they were late last year against Philly. Change the plan this week. Philly has lost two LB’s, run the ball and get Boss and Smith over the middle in missmatches against the depleted LB’s and young safteys. I could guarntee you one of the first plays this Sunday is a deep bomb to Hixon. I hope it works for once.
Why I think we lost
1) Eli
I’m eli’s biggest fan, and I took some flak at school saying Eli is the most clutch qb in the game. But yesterday was mostly on him. All that changing plays, and not hiking right until the play clock is near zero shouldn’t be. A good chunk of his throws weren’t very good. And that last desperation throw into double coverage, I saw a free nicks underneath, and others said boss was free at the seems. Eli needs to step up his game to what we know he can do
2) Shotgun
Why were we in shotgun 90% of the 2nd half? We were winning, had loads of time, and we kept passing the ball. At least pretend to be interested in running. Which leads me to my next reason
3) Lack of Play Action
Isn’t that what this team is based off of? Establishing the run and using Play Action? Maybe some of those deep routes would have worked with Play Action. Can anyone tell me about how many times Play Action was called last night?
4) Personnel Decisions (e.g. Hixon on deep routes)
Hixon is a scrawny little guy who should never be running deep. That should be Nicks, Smith, or even Manningham’s job. Putting Hixon in takes time away from our better receivers
5) Lack of Boss and Smith until too late
Smith was the #1 receiver the last few weeks. Why not throw it to him before the 4th quarter? Boss showed us what he can do, and he always makes big plays.
They’re are more. The officiating was much better, only one call that should have gone our way (PI, not even pretending to make a play on the ball), but can’t complain since the Cards had more penalty yards. Feagles had an uncharacteristically off day.
The D played its heart out. There were maybe only 2 or 3 plays where we were completely out of play (Fitz wide open, Boldin for 40 some yards, and Pierce getting manhandled). But if the D gives us 3 chances in the 4th quarter to tie it, we need to take it and run wild with it
goes to show ya...
being clutch…no matter who you are, you’re never gonna be 100% in those situations.
I still want him with the rock in the final minutes over everyone.
Agree on the Boss thing, the Giants need to cut this “we don’t use the TE as much” crap out. They have a potential star there in Boss, and they barely use him.
They used Swiss too, but he was covered
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 26, 2009 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Yea get Boss involved
he’s a trusted Route runner, has good hands, and is a mismatch for most LB’s and a lot of saftey’s. He should be involved on 3rd down and Red Zone more. Nothing crazy but let him move the sticks.
I still want Eli
Just he needs to improve.
Having Cowboy fans think they’re better than the giants is not a fun way to start off school.
One more thing with Boss
with all of the injuries to Philly’s LB’s and a couple of young safteys still getting their legs under them as starters Boss better be more involved this week over the middle. He made some big plays last year in the playoff loss and yet the Giants kept going deep to the outside.
yup.
The Giants need to be concerned with just converting. I really miss those marches down the field, where not everything clicks, yet they just convert 3rd downs.
Boss can be a huge part of that.
They need to scrap the deep bomb for a little while. It was good and cute while its worked, but how’s about going to what Eli’s great at, those intermediate and slant routes.
The slant route has been MIA for 2 games. We’ve lost for 2 games. The pass O has been inconsistent for 2 games, coinincidence?
Why there is not such animal as a hot route to Boss, I don’t know. I’ve seen them keep Boss in to block, yet use Madison Hedgecock as the “hot route”. Something is terribly wrong with that idea.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 26, 2009 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions
we can scream for Boss until we're blue in the face....
KG won’t do a damn thing about it…it’s something I said coming into the season, and i’ve been extremely disappointed.
I’m expecting another 33 reception season from Boss….and it’s killing me.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
looks like it...
I mean, I’m OK with the TE not being option 1 or even option 4. Its just that when options 1-4 don’t seem to be working….why not just try it early on to see if its working?
I can’t see why the Giants are so afraid to use the middle of the field with Boss.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 26, 2009 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions
makes me sick really...
I like how they put him in the backfield on one play…only to turn around and throw a quick WR screen.
Now what kinda sense does that make to you? wouldn’t you want your TE out in the slot or even at the end of the line so he could go lay a block on someone???
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
Home work:
These last two games really show which team study more and had better game plans.
It showed the opposition out played our players and out coach our coach’s.
The guys on the injury list better get well soon.
The secondary and line backers are desperately needed.
If coaches and players don’t do better than the last two games, we might not get into the play-off this year.
Alot of very relevant points made
and ones I’ve argued with friends, family, and coworkers. But remember fellow fans, if we win next week we are still in first place with a 3-0 record in division. For me at least, win next week and all is forgiven (especially against the Iggles). Lose, and I’m reaching for my pitchfork and torch.
Homer: Aw, twenty dollars! I wanted a peanut!
Homer's Brain: Twenty dollars can buy many peanuts!
Homer: Explain how!
Homer's Brain: Money can be exchanged for goods and services!
Homer: Woo-hoo!
by bigbluethruandthru on Oct 26, 2009 10:29 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Kevin Boss
Why dont we use Boss! I think he can be a major weapon in this offense, but he never seems to be a significant part the offensive gameplan. No TDs yet this year- WHY! It is so frustrating watching this offense!!!
o line
most of what is being said starts up front snee ohara and seubert had their worst games of the year arizona had no prob getting pressure up the middle . you can plan for edge pressure mid press upsets all phases of the offense
and
the darn wr’s gotta start going up for the ball like its their paycheck

by 


















