'Kudos & Wet Willies:' How many Wet Willies can I give the defense?
OK, so the headline of this post gives away what I am thinking right now. At the very least, C.C. Brown is getting 'Wet Willies' for both ears.
Before I get to the full 'Kudos & Wet Willies', however, some general thoughts about Sunday's 48-27 embarrassment our New York Giants (5-1) suffered at the hands of the New Orleans Saints (5-0).
Be honest, after watching the past few games you had to at least think it was possible that Drew Brees and the Saints would do something like this to the Giants' defense. The pass rush has not been there consistently, and the secondary's stats have had more to do with the poor offenses the Giants had played against than anything special being done by the defensive backs.
Ralph Vacchiano said that Brees predicted that New Orleans would score at least 40 points on the Giants defense. Can't get mad at the guy when he's right. Shoot, the Saints could have put up 60 or more had they needed to, or wanted to. The Giants had absolutely no answers.
The Giants' offense was not perfect Sunday, either, but I am not going to waste time criticizing that unit. Eli Manning and crew had to figure out early that their defense had no chance of helping them, and there was no way the offense was going to match the Saints score-for-score, try as they might. Manning (14-for-31, one TD, one INT, one fumble) obviously did not have his best day. Offense, though, was not the problem. The Giants did move the ball, did average 5.7 yards per play and did score 27 points.
You can't win, though, when you have to score 50 just to have a chance. The Giants think, and we want to believe, they have a championship-caliber club. That won't happen, however, if they can't play better defense than that against good teams.
I am not jumping off the bridge, and I don't think you guys should either. It was just one bad game in a long season. Still, the ease with which the Saints dispatched the Giants is disturbing. Now, on with the 'Kudos & Wet Willies.'
Kudos to ...
- Domenik Hixon: Welcome back to the role you are best suited for, Domenik! I know I'm not the only one, but I have been advocating Hixon's return to returning since training camp. Sunday, he showed why with seven kickoff returns for 230 yards, including 68 and 45-yard returns, and two punt returns for 51 yards. Throw in three pass receptions for 22 yards for good measure, and it was a great day for Hixon. He at least gave the Giants a chance.
- Mario Manningham: Manningham had a decent game with four catches for 50 yards, and made a nice play to take an interception away from Darren Sharper and score a touchdown.
- Hakeem Nicks: The No. 1 pick is developing nicely as a weapon for Manning. Five catches for 114 yards Sunday, including a 58-yard catch and run.
- Ahmad Bradshaw: Ran had and well in limited opportunities, though it wasn't nearly enough to keep the Giants in the game. Bradshaw also missed a blitz pickup that led to an interception and had me debating whether or not to leave him off this list. I would give Brandon Jacobs 'kudos' to, but seven carries isn't enough to earn it. And his best play, a leaping touchdown catch in a huge crowd, was wiped out by a phantom penalty.
Now, we move on to the really brutal part of this.
Wet Willies to ...
- The entire defense: Let's face it, that was an utterly embarrassing performance by a unit that calls itself one of the best in the league. They had no answers for the Saints. They could not cover receivers. They could not pressure Brees. They could not seem to get along with each other, as there were lots of 'discussions' between players who seemed not to be able to fulfill their assignments, make any plays or get the help they were expecting from other players. I will, of course, hand out plenty of individual 'Wet Willies,' but in all honesty I can't name one defensive player who actually had a good game.
- C.C. Brown: So, here is next week's game plan for Kurt Warner and the Arizona Cardinals, and probably for every team the Giants play the rest of the season. Find the guy Brown is supposed to be covering, or the area he is supposed to be responsible for, and throw the ball there. Brown had a team-high 13 tackles Sunday, but that is only because it seemed like nearly every New Orleans play was designed to abuse him. In man coverage, allegedly, Brown had no chance. In zone coverage, he was repeatedly late arriving or made a bad read and went to the wrong area entirely (just ask Kevin Dockery). I said way back in training camp and pre-season that Brown is terrible in coverage. The only reason it has not been an issue until now is because of the inept offenses the Giants faced the past three weeks. I don't know if Aaron Rouse, or one of the guys on the Giants' practice squad is any better but Brown will be an issue the rest of the season.
- The defensive line: In the pre-season I was asked if the Giants had put together a historically good defensive line. My question right now is more along the lines of "is this group over-rated?' One sack Sunday, and that came from linebacker Chase Blackburn. Pressure from the defensive line was totally non-existent Sunday, and if the Giants can't pressure we now see what can happen to this weakened secondary. The Giants have now had games this season when their line has been gashed with the running game, and more than one game where the pass rush from the front four has been invisible. They can't miss Chris Canty and Jay Alford that much, can they?
- Bill Sheridan: The rookie defensive coordinator has gotten lots of praise thus far in 2009. When your defense looks that far overmatched, though, the coordinator has to take a hit. Sheridan could not find a way to get pressure. He could not find a way to get the Giants in coverages that worked. There were, seemingly, too many blown coverages and guys out of position. Too many lineman and linebackers looking like they were freelancing instead of playing the defense. Sean Payton made Sheridan and the Giants look defenseless, and the coordinator needs to take some of the blame.
- Eli Manning: I almost feel bad giving Eli a 'Wet Willie' here. Absolute perfection from the Giants offense would probably not have been enough to win Sunday. Manning had a rough game, though, just missing a few open receivers, throwing a bad interception and coughing up a fumble that was a huge turning point. By the way, have you ever seen Eli get in a player's face the way he got after Bradshaw for the missed blitz pickup that caused the interception? He not only very obviously yelled at AB, but he grabbed him by the shoulder pads and gave him a little 'what the heck were you doing?' shove. Wow!
- The officiating: I am not going to whine here, because the Giants got blown out of the Louisiana Superdome all by themselves. They would have needed a ton of help just to be in the game, like maybe being allowed to use 14-15 defenders not named C.C. Brown. But how many bad, or phantom, calls were there in that game. Pass interference on Corey Webster? Face mask on Bryan Kehl? I'm still looking for the holding call on Shaun O'Hara that negated Jacobs' touchdown catch. The officials are going to get calls wrong. The thing that bothers me is when flags get throws for things they 'think' they see. If you are an official and you aren't 'sure' you see something, you have to keep the flag in your pocket.
- Me: What did I do, you ask? Well, I hate to admit that Sunday is the first time this year I failed to wear one of my Giants' shirts on a game day. I did have my Giants' winter cap on to try (unsuccessfully, I might add) to stay warm at my son's soccer game. The cap, apparently, does not carry any good luck with it.
This list could probably be a lot longer. I can't stand it anymore, though, so that's enough for now.
Giants vs Saints coverage
Giants vs Saints boxscore
Canal Street Chronicles
143 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
AP deserves a wet willie, IMHO, for not only being completely absent in pass coverage, but for his quarterbacking of that debacle. Any time there are that many defensive breakdowns across the board, the leader of that unit has to assume some responsibility for what transpired on the field.
by Step up and make big plays on Oct 19, 2009 6:39 AM EDT reply actions
I'd say
It’s really on Sheridan for having no answers.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 7:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Scheme vs. execution?
This question came up during the postgame show, and the announcers unanimously agreed that poor execution was at fault. I fall somewhere in the middle — there were breakdowns in assignments, but guys weren’t placed in the right spots on the field and few visibly effective in-game adjustments were made. And the real interlocutor between the 11 men on the field and the defensive coordinator is AP, who was lackluster at best yesterday in performing his duties.
by Step up and make big plays on Oct 19, 2009 7:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I dunno...
aside from a few plays, ones that really weren’t all that big of plays…most of the time there was a CB in the WR or TE’s back pocket.
Actually, the only time I saw Colston wide open for that long catch, TT fell down.
If you have TIVO, watch it again. Drew Brees threaded the needle on EVERY ONE of those big plays.
There was a CB there for most of them, and many times when a guy was wide open, it was CC Brown’s fault (hopefully Ross comes back and plays safety..I don’t care he’s not big enough, he can tackle well, we need guys that can cover people.)
No, if you want to blame ONE PLAYER, its really CC Brown. We all harped on the fact taht some team is gonna laugh at the fact that this guy is back there and expose him, and well…Drew Brees did.
He provided no help at all, and when he was actually there for coverage…he failed.
But even then, this isn;’t all on CC. Dockery, TT, (Bruce and Mike) Johnson, even Webster…all got torched.
This is not on one person, its on the team.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 19, 2009 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions
if we had a pass rush
maybe Brees doesn’t complete so many of those “thread the needle” passes if he was under some pressure. But there was none.
C.C. Brown sucked, we all saw that. But other than him, I blame the D-line more than the secondary for that performance. (or maybe equal blame?) Osi is not the same dominant player and neither is Tuck. Sure, they piled up 6 sacks against the Raiders, but who cares. And how many times did the DT’s jump offsides on the hard count.
by M. on Oct 19, 2009 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I did not were a Giant shir either
my wife and I meet friends of hers at a bar/resturant and she wanted me to look “nice” so I had a nice sweater on instead of my Bavaro shirt. My wife felt bad as the GIants lost and every other guy in the Bar had a Giants shirt on. I blame myself too.
Without knowing what jerseys we were wearing
I went w/ the road white. I did kinda figure we’d wind up wearing blue (in 4 games on the road, we’ve worn white once) as the Saints have worn white at home at least one other time. I’ll from now on be prepared to wear both if I don’t know any better. Because we all know that no matter how hard they practice or scheme all week, the game will always rely on what we wear or don’t wear ;-P
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions
Let’s take our medicine gents.. The D-line IS over-rated. They disappeared in the Philly playoff game and yesterday. We have too many games like this against good teams. With the amount of times that they threw and with the Saints having two banged up guys on the line, that was a pathetic and lame showing. When we “eat” against teams other than the dregs of the league, consistently, this is who we are. We either feast or famine.
they are...
but how about some credit where it its due. The Saints O-Line is excellent.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 19, 2009 7:04 AM EDT up reply actions
True
But you still have to do better than that.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 7:13 AM EDT up reply actions
yes.
They needed to come up with something.
Tho, again, I think the injuries caught up with them. Let Boley play in this game and wreak his havoc over the middle, maybe its a different ballgame…and AP is freed up to Blitz instead of plod into coverage.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 19, 2009 7:18 AM EDT up reply actions
Boley
I thought about that. I love Blackburn, but without Boley (and Sintim) the Giants just have no real play-making linebackers. It’s been a defensive weakness for years now.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 7:42 AM EDT up reply actions
The guys playing are backups...
plain and simple (except for AP). And that exposes AP, cuz with Clark and Blackburn as the WLB and SLB…Pierce is the most athletic and fast out of them…THAT’S BAD!!!!!
…as a side note, I don’t know what to think of him yet. Yea, I know how everyone saw this great playmaking LB in preseason and I’m sure you saw in camp, but where is he?
I’m just skeptical of a rookie who hasn’t played yet cuz of injury. The Reese truster in me wants to say…“Hey, look at Hakeem Nicks, hasn’t played much this season but looks like a star when he touches the ball”. I want to think the same of Sintim….but I don’t want to think anymore, I want to see it.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 19, 2009 7:53 AM EDT up reply actions
***Him ....Being Clint Sintim
that’s what I get for taking a uh…break, in between sentences..
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 19, 2009 7:53 AM EDT up reply actions
Absolutely correct
Boley makes this LB core a completely different beast for that very reason. And while everyone has been praising Thomas, Aaron Ross needs to be on the field. Not only for pass coverage, but he’s an excellent corner blitzer. And then chokes back tears not having Phillips back there, well, that just hurts.
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions
True, their O-line did yeoman-like work
But with starting Pro Bowl LT Jammal Brown gone for the season, I expected more pressure from our ends versus a backup.
by Step up and make big plays on Oct 19, 2009 10:14 AM EDT up reply actions
so did I...
but I think they really helped him out well.
Good O-Line depth, good O-line coaching.
=
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 20, 2009 6:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Ed, I have to disagree with Eli’s Wet Willie. What could the guy do yesterday? That fumble from the blindside, you can’t seriously hold against him. That pick wasn’t his fault as Bradshaw clearly gagged on his assignment. The knock I have on him yesterday was the pick to Sharper even though it was called back, was a horrible read and throw. The guys just didn’t show up for Easy E as a team. He clearly felt pressure to win and I feel he was let down to a degree. If the defense was halfway competent, we would have won. Oh well.. We better get used to our secondary being abused as this is the game plan against us going forward until we stop it.
I think Eli
deserves on for taking those deep shot early in the game. Yea, they connect those quick strikes make a game of it. But if they fail…well 48-27 happens.
Also Gilbride is part of that. I know he doesn’t throw the ball, but I think the game plan of throwing deep against the Saints was what they came up with. I don’t think it was necessarily wrong, its just that they in hindsight should have waited to unleash it.
I mean, yea, the Saints did it and all theirs connected (more reason to throw this game away…that’s not gonna happen again, everything connecting.)
Eli wasn’t the reason the team lost obviously, but he was part of it. These are the types of games that a QB like him should be excelling. Not saying he can’t, but he didn’t. I think Eli knows he can, we all (should) know he can, its just that he didn’t. I’m sure Easy E is frustrated (as that yelling at AB showed) so he knows he wasn’t good enough today.
Yea, even if Eli was at the top of his game, the Saints O was infallible Sunday. But that’s not the point. Eli missed a few throws, rushed some towards his end there, no…he definitely deserves blame here.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 19, 2009 7:03 AM EDT up reply actions
He shouldn’t get a pass but a Willie? I’m not sure about that. There were some things that could have been better, but look at the difference in the pocket between the two O-lines. You can’t fault Eli for being rushed constantly. We just flat out got outplayed and outcoached on both sides of the ball.
I didn't think Eli was getting rushed any more than he's been in every game this year.
yea, the Saints blitzed a lot, but I think he was going for the long pass too much (again..some of this is the playcalling).
I wish they would have put in some more quick passes early on.
Ball control early on, then hit em deep later on.
Also, those DEEP PASSES WERE ON THIRD AND SHORT. Really, really didn’t like WHEN the deep passes were called and tried.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 19, 2009 7:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed
But, I do think there were 2-3 plays there to be made — when Eli had time — where he missed guys. I know the ‘Willie’ is debatable, but let’s just agree that it wasn’t Eli’s best game.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 7:43 AM EDT up reply actions
He wasn't on target
They may not have been bad balls, but there were a couple passes (mostly all those long shots) that a better throw would have made for a completion. Gotta put it where only your man can get it.
After seeing him get on Bradshaw, no one (I’m looking at you Tiki) can call his leadership “laughable”. And as the unquestionable leader, you get the credit when you do well, but you’ll take the hit when you lose. He can take the Willie, he can handle it.
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions
Maybe I'm alone on this
but I didn’t consider that “leadership”. Ok he was frustrated and called his player out. I thought that was out of character for Eli and showed that he himself was too amped up for this game. Understandably, maybe, but that way nonetheless. I thought it would have been stronger leadership to talk to Bradshaw on the sideline or somewhere else not on all the cameras in the world.
"We were very much aware of that. There was a lot of phone call-type things going on in the room." -- Tom Coughlin
Maybe, and probably
But I bet Bradshaw doesn’t make that mistake again. Part of that bad throw was Eli getting hit in the armpit, from the guy that Bradshaw should have picked up.
Like I said
I felt bad about giving it. But, still, his numbers were not good. The INT was a bad throw, protection issue or not. He had a couple of opportunities he missed. I do agree, though, there wasn’t much the guy could do about winning the game. It was not going to happen the way the D played.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 7:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Ed
Eli was hit on the INT. The hit didn’t allow him to follow through. The Saints brought pressure most of the game.
I agree
Unlike the Giants D, the Saints blitzed and blitzed often. When you’re down 14-0 you can’t throw deep on third and 5. You have to look to pick up the first down and move the ball down the field.
My only other knock. On the sack and fumble I felt Eli should have spike the ball killing the clock. The play took too much time off the clock. The entire sequenced was rushed.
Think Bradshaw deserves no kudo
He does for running wild of course. But a wet wille for that missed block, which was one of the key plays in the game. Giants had plenty of time to do something in that drive…AB’s brainfart cost them there.
Lets also give a big wet willie and a kick in the ass to every analyst who constantly dribbled out (and will dribble out THIS WHOLE WEEK) that the Giants were just fattening up on crappy teams.
Well, idiots.., what did the Saints do? Obviously they handled Big Blue…but if the score was the opposite, the Saints didn’t exactly play any tougher schedule that the Giants, so they COULD have been accused of fattening up on weak opponents too.
Just my useless rant right there. I know we lost, but its just that certain stupidity like that, that keeps getting spewed over and over again…you gotta beat who’s in front of you. The Giants did that until Sunday..and the Saints did it too. Better team won yesterday, but I don’t want to hear that the Giants fatten up on weak opponents before it.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
Oh...
agree with basically everything there ED. Especially the Wet Willie for yourself. What are you thinking not putting on Gints shirt?
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
LOL!
I don’t know, to be honest. I had a feeling when I was getting dressed that I was making a mistake. My bad.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 7:16 AM EDT up reply actions
So JR
What is the plan to bolster safety?
CC for the whole season could cost the Giants..the season.
Sheridan. You plan to keep Clark out there the whole year too? What is the timetable for Sintim
I agree 1000%. We get rid of James Butler for another James Butler. I don’t know if Sintim would have covered better. He hasn’t been on the field for us to know any different. It just seemed the Saints were on a different level than us yesterday. Faster and more athletic than we are. Just like the first game of 2007 against Dallas.
CC
Problem is, what can you do now? If there was anyone better available, he would already have a job.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 7:44 AM EDT up reply actions
defense was bad, but....
the defense was bad, but….with chris canty, kenny phillips, aaron ross, michael boley, etc. missing, the defense was just mismatched and outperformed…but on offense, on the 1st series of the game, on 3rd and 3, i would expect maybe a screen or a short hook route, or something to the flats…but no, they decide to throw for 25 yards when THERE WAS SOMEONE OPEN UNDERNEATH…what ever happened to ball control, and running the ball? jacobs seemed effective, as did bradshaw…why not keep giving it to them…you control the ball, you control the clock…and when u control the clock, u control the game…that is common football knowledge…
Yup.
Basically…all a that.
Defense HAD to get exposed for all the injuries at some point. Would they have done better with all on deck? I dunno, but it couldn’t have hurt?
And I 100% agree on the offense. I LOVE the deep ball, its just WHEN that really annoyed me.
…CONVERT the 3rd down, that we’ve been doing so well all year…THEN GO DEEP!
We’d still have 2nd and 3rd to get the first. Instead, we’re punting and the Saints are marching.
Definitely didn’t like that. I don’t mind the deep ball, its just they need to be smarter about when to use it.
Its not a high percentage play (well. for the Saints it is, at least Sunday), tho it pretty much has been golden all year for the Giants, but you just don’t do it..on third down, especially down 7.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 19, 2009 7:29 AM EDT up reply actions
It was Boss
Boss was wide open underneath. The Giants need to shorten that game. Not throw the ball down field. After the Saints opening drive that consumed 8 minutes I said that works to the Giants advantage. Shorten the game. Little did I know how wrong I would be.
also a short game
would have gotten Steve Smith involved. What a crazy idea that would be.
After the Saints opened with a 7-min drive, it was imperative the Giants set the tone by getting back on the board with some power football. A drive of their own to take the rest of the quarter and not the disgusting, pass-happy crap I saw
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 19, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions
Big Loss
C.C. Brown is useless. His only upside is he makes the biggest hits on the field. Too bad he can’t make a play.
I’m going to call it now: Canty and/or Ross will be playing next week. I can’t see Coughlin allowing them to sit back any longer. Get healthy or get on IR so we can add some depth somewhere else. I’m starting to wonder if there’s a part of our team that isn’t overrated. I’m in the camp that believes we just had a bad game, and personally I think Arizona is going to really regret getting us on Sunday.
+1
The gameplan was dumb.
They went into shootout mode when down(7-0) and lost their identity in the process.
It was painful to watch, however Raiders over Eagles. Chiefs over Redskins, and Bills over Jets. Helped dull the pain some.
Can't blame the offense
It became obvious early they were going to need to go into ‘shootout mode.’ They had to take some chances. This one is on the defense, plain and simple.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 7:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Eventually Ed yes. But when you heave it up on the first drive it screams panic.
How different would the game have been if they ran more on their first drive and took some time off and evened up the score.
The defense was painfully awful to watch. But the offensive gameplan looked not Giant like.
It was an entire team lose. I just didn’t like the immediate heaving up of the long ball.
Thing is
If that worked you would be praising it. I think the Giants felt they were going to have to take some shots. Was it the right thing to do? Debatable. This loss is not on the offense, though. Not when the defense just gave up the most points surrendered by a Giants team this decade.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 8:05 AM EDT up reply actions
Not hanging it on the offense
“It was an entire team lose.” :P
I didn't mind taking shots
but like Free, I hated when they took the shots. The Saints just absolutely picked apart your defense on the opening drive, you pick up a quick first down and then have a 3rd and short – just get the first down and keep the chains moving. I know a better throw to Smith scores a TD, but I’d rather have kept the Saints off the field.
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
but I want to point out that I'm not criticizing Gilbride
honestly, that might have been designed to be a short pass, but Eli saw Smith break open and decided to heave it. In fact, that’s my suspicion (remember Eli’s quote about most of the plays not really being designed for Smith, but he gets open so Eli throws to him anyway).
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
The incomplete to Smith is on Eli
Smith was WIDE open, a little more touch on that ball and it’s an easy TD. You have to take that shot. I don’t think that was 3rd down anyway. Let’s face it Brees was way out of Eli’s league today. Eli had a lot more pressure than Brees, but the Giants needed him to make a few more plays today
If this is the play i think it was
The Saints DB made a great play on the ball.
He was beat, but was able to speed up and tip the ball away
that was the really deep one to Hixon you're thinking of.
I agreee.
That throw was actually right on the money, the DB did make a nice play.
Yet, again, that was on 3rd down.
This is of course all on the defense. No one expected them to be TORCHED like that, so I guess they thought like every other game they can take chances and rely on the D getting stops.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 20, 2009 6:59 AM EDT up reply actions
it was definitely third down.
It was a low percentage play on 3rd down. That’s not the Giants game.
Swiss was wide open, yea, and that damn near connected.
…but it didn’t, and it cost us.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 20, 2009 6:57 AM EDT up reply actions
If the D could have just gotten a stop just twice
We could have ran the ball more (which was pretty effective) and slowed the game a bit more to our liking. Bradshaw is really proving to be the premier RB. ESPN pregame crew calls referred to him as a “factor back”. I like the sound of it.
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions
agree.
I mean…c’mon.
This isn’t as bad as losing to the Browns last year right? That made the Gints 4-1, this..5-1. We all scratched our heads after that one too, I’m sure a little more than we are today.
We all know what we have here. The rest of the season will be a test, but this one game doesn’t show anything.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 19, 2009 7:44 AM EDT up reply actions
Canty and Ross
Since neither of them has been able to practice for weeks now, I think that is highly unlikely. Can’t play if you can’t run, so don’t be counting on that. As for over-rated, didn’t I say that in the post? I think the d-line has got to be better, or this team is in a world of hurt defensively.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 7:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Sheridan...
Way to many zone calls and made it hard to put pressure on Brees with all the 4 man rushes he called…Seemed very intimidated and didnt show NO what NY Giants football is about…very disappointing and hopefully if we meet them in the playoffs it can be alittle like 2007 when we played Dallas and then the Pats.
by SportsDalaiLama on Oct 19, 2009 7:45 AM EDT reply actions
Zones
Well, the Giants were getting embarrassed trying to play man. As for the four-man rushes, I agree — sort of. This team is built to get pressure with just four. Unfortunately, they are not getting it done. There were a good number of blitzes as the game wore on, but I will keep saying this. Our defensive line has got to play better. Right now, they are not playing up to their reputations.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 7:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Best game ever for me since...
I watched it on tape. I watched the second half on fast forward, and it was the best decision I made all day (the best one would have been to not tape it at all, but hindsight…). From what I saw, the Saints seemed to really help out the O-Line (TE and RB), they went after the safeties at every opportunity, and the Giants did not blitz a whole lot. I know, I know, Brees getting blitzed means you are exposed in the secondary… but hell, they were exposed anyway, so why not blitz a bit since your gameplan is not working at all?
That was PAINFUL. I can not recall the last time I watched something on fast forward like that (likely a 2002-2004 Giants football game).
the lack of blitzing...
…reminded me of the Jags-Patriots playoff game two seasons ago where Jacksonville opted to challenge Brady by dropping seven into coverage and only rushing four. Brady picked them apart in an almost flawless performance, and the game undoubtedly provided Spags plenty of evidence on film for how NOT to attack the vaunted Patriots offense.
The point is, against these type of juggurnaut offenses you have to bring the pressure if you hope to disrupt their timing and get them out of rhythm at all. We proved that in Super Bowl XLII, but we failed to do it this week.
by Step up and make big plays on Oct 19, 2009 7:54 AM EDT up reply actions
another thing is...
as pissed as we all are and frustrated too..this is actually a good thing.
We got the Saints O on tape. If our coaching staff is worth anything, they’ll figure out what went wrong and fix it when needed again.
Yea, the D-Line didn’t get pressure, but what was the Saints O-Line doing so well to block the Giants pressure?
…sometimes, its kinda good to get an EPIC FAIL like this game on tape, even if the following week sucks balls for the fans.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 19, 2009 7:58 AM EDT up reply actions
Look at the past 4 SB Champs
all had some stretch of advisity during the year and some question marks going into the playoffs. Even the Pats in 04 got destoryed in P-Burgh which cost them home field then came back in Jan to burry the Steelers. Lets be honest the G-men’s only advisity last year was the Plax situation and that was more of a distraction. I agree with your point about getting these games on film. Arizona got humiliated by the Eagles last year then scored at will to beat them to get to the SB last year.
Yup.
This SUCKS (especially the Yankees fail last night and the Rangers getting their brains kicked in….)
I hate losing…but sometimes, its not a bad thing (tho for the Yankees….can’t really be giving games away…)
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 20, 2009 7:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Case in Point
All one needs to do is watch the game film from the Saints/Jets game two weeks ago. The Jets held the Saints to 10 offensive points. The Saints didn’t score a TD until midway through the 4th quarter. Is the Jets defense that much better than the Giants? The Jets bought pressure the entire game.
I feel ya
They might be talented, but 4 guys against 5 linemen and a RB and the occasional TE just aren’t going to get the job done. You got to bring a man. And when they did, it actually seemed to work. There was one play where Brees had a man wide open but threw a horrible pass b/c he had Blackburn in his face.
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions
This is what the Giants needed, an ass kicking!
Not to repeat anything that hasn’t already been said, but to get exposed in such a manner, from different areas, is a good thing. Now, the key is to fix what has been exposed and throw out what has failed. This goes along the lines of game planning, calling plays, execution or player personnel. It would be too easy, but lenghty to point out what didn’t work.
This game will either make you better as individuals, or, it’s going to make you feel sorry for yourself?! At this time, i have this feeling that i do not want to be Kurt Warner.
Hah, nope
we’re gonna destroy their o-line and eat him alive
"Manning.... lobbs it! Burress, alone! TOUCHDOOOWN NEW YORK!"
The Offense
I put some of it on the O too. They weren’t going to win a shootout. Going long on 3rd and 3 was a horrible call. At that point they needed to keep the D off the field, chew up some time, and get the thing back under control.
Remember how Parcell’s coached teams used to beat superior offenses? Chew up the clock, long drives. Oh yeah, and have LT bury the QB. So, Major Wet Willie to Osi & Tuck. The team is counting on those guys to get the QB rattled.
For real though
I appreciate them going deep a couple times to spread the field, but they did way too much. We tried to play their game instead of just doing what we do best.
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
I think the plays were there to be made.
We just missed them. Had those plays been made, then the Saints’ D would have had to adjust for them and we could have gone more ball control after that. They knew we wanted to do ball control too, which is why those long plays were there for the taking, don;t you think?
"We were very much aware of that. There was a lot of phone call-type things going on in the room." -- Tom Coughlin
Keep in mind though
Had those plays been made
Those plays aren’t considered high percentage plays, which came on third and manageable short yardage opportunities. It would’ve been safer to check down underneath, not 20 yards down field. The Giants seemed to get out of their offensive game plan early. The Giants were horrible converting on third downs. Converting a few more would have definitely lessened the Saints chances on offense and the Giants trying to turn this into a sprint!
And the Saints were very good at converting theirs
How can we stuff the run on first and second downs, but if it’s third down, we leave gaping holes? Amazing. Even if Sheridan misses that, AP’s gotta pick it up. Someone has to be out of place.
Wet Willies
To the double-bobbled pick by I think Brown and Dockery that turned into a 20 yd Lance Moore Reception.
To the officials for the phantom hold, the non-fumble…. but officiating that didn’t blow would not have won us this game either way.
Kudos to Vilma for negating a Darren Sharper pick-6
"Manning.... lobbs it! Burress, alone! TOUCHDOOOWN NEW YORK!"
I was furious
To the double-bobbled pick by I think Brown and Dockery that turned into a 20 yd Lance Moore Reception.
I believe it was Brown. It was right there in his hands! If i’m not mistaken, it was third down and even if he didn’t pick it off, just bat the ball down and it would’ve been fourth down. I also think that catch led to their second score?!
Just a lucky bounce that you ponder, the what if’s!
It was Webster on the first drive
It looked like he pulled up just a bit because Thomas was coming at him from the opposite direction.
That was Webster
A play that had to be made.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 19, 2009 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions
the fact that that was Webster
just hurts. I thought he was the one guy who played pretty well. ugh…
"Manning.... lobbs it! Burress, alone! TOUCHDOOOWN NEW YORK!"
Kudos to Brandon Jacobs
for showing some heart and going up to make an amazing TD catch, even if it was negated. When I was starting to feel like the team was giving up and looked emotionless (besides Eli tearing into Bradshaw), Jacobs kept faith in the play, looked for Eli, and went up to make a sick, sick grab in the end zone. TD or not, I appreciated that, sure Eli did, and it shows his receiving skills have improved a ton.
"Manning.... lobbs it! Burress, alone! TOUCHDOOOWN NEW YORK!"
I couldn't belive he caught it either
Eli made an awesome reverse and was outrunning everyone, than just chucked it up and Jacobs came up with the ball. I thought he was intercepted for sure.
The refs screwed up big time. The replay showed that o’hara didn’t even touch a defensive player. they all went around him
I think one of you guys made the point before
but does anybody think the Giants slide a corner over to saftey when Aaron Ross gets back (if he ever does)? I think Boley comming back will help because he’ll take some pressure off the safteys but CC Brown makes we longing for James Butler. I’ve also read before that in the Giants defensive scheme they don’t have strong or free saftey both guys play each position depending upon the offensive formation. Do you think they change that a bit with Michael Johnson playing free saftey most of the time and CC playing down in the Box in running situations? I think SHeridan did not do a good job but I think it was more execution than scheme yesterday especailly with the D-Line. This week will be a good test for Sheridan to see how he handles this and if he makes some adjustments against another pass happy team.
I'd think they do
CC Brown is not helping.
Ross is good stopping the run, TT too.
They both were considered CB/S type guys, so maybe they actually get treated like that.
Its just that one guy, CC Brown, that’s killing the Giants. If they had another guy to cover someone, I don’t think they’ve be all that bad.
Also…having Dockery and Brown on the same side killed the Giants too.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 20, 2009 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions
GOING DEEP ON 3RD DOWN
What was KG doing calling for deep balls on third downs when we have been successful all year just by NOT throwing deep. I don’t think Eli was changing the plays. We could’ve matched them score for score if we had converted the thrid downs by not throwing deep.
Ed Dumbcholi and his crew had a field day against giants. I can’t believe he is still officiating.
- We should have taken more time off the clock on the drive right before halftime that resulted in TD to Manningham thus preventing the Saints to score.
- More running plays in the first half.
- Someone please give CC Brown a wedgie because he seemed lost every time a pass play was called.
- The front four had a bad day. It happens. They’ll be back.
- The saints were more prepared. They came to play and we got shell shocked in the first half. That won’t happen again. We’ll see them again and we’ll win.
Eli led the league
in completions over 20 yards, and was second in completions over 40 yards. So that was very much what they HAVE been doing this season. I just didn’t like doing it on 3rd and short when your D just got eaten alive.
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
I have to believe the Giants will be competitive with Sintim and Boley on the field and Ross at corner with Thomas moving to safety. As for the offense, the Giants are not built to win shootouts- being this far down and not being able to even slow the Saints down put too much pressure on Gilbride and Manning. That said, a play here and there and the game becomes competitive.
Going in I could not see anyone covering the tight end or backs out of the backfield and that happened. Once the short game is clicking, NO could look for the deep ball and CC Brown was not up to the challenge. If we get Boley back and have Ross healthy and still cannot cover people, then it is time to panic.
Here was the problem….The Giants went to a shoot out way too early in the game. Keep control of the clock-keep their offense off the field and run the ball down their throat. Limit their opportunties on offense. That would of kept the game close. Second-what I haven’t heard yet is this game was the 4th away game for the Giants in 5 weeks!!!! Plus going against a team coming off a bye after palying all those away games-at their building no less-very very diffucult for any team to overcome that.
Wet Willie to Coughlin or Gilbride...
Whoever decided it was a good idea to run a play with 29 seconds left on the clock from your own 35 after the defense just got us all the momentum by stopping the Saints on fourth and goal from the one. You take the fawkin knee, and go into halftime down ten with the momentum and getting the ball. Stupid.
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 19, 2009 9:13 AM EDT reply actions
An actual conversation
My Girlfriend: The Giants are getting the ball back. Maybe they’ll get to score again before halftime.
Me: No, there’s not enough time left and they have no timeouts. There’s too much to risk and lose by trying to score from here… oh wait, they’re getting into shotgun. I guess they’re gonna go for it after all.
fast forward a couple minutes
My girlfriend: What just happened?
Me: Well, that was really stupid. I think we just lost the game.
I was at a loss.
That really goes against everything I’ve seen from Coughlin over the years.
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 19, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Do you remember the drive against Dallas
in the ’07 playoffs, right before the half?
"We were very much aware of that. There was a lot of phone call-type things going on in the room." -- Tom Coughlin
Yea I remember that...
The Cowboys just scored on two VERY long drives. ELi comes out and ties it before half.
Guess it just wasn’t our game…
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 19, 2009 10:20 PM EDT up reply actions
i was CONVINCED
it would be 27-24 before half.
"Manning.... lobbs it! Burress, alone! TOUCHDOOOWN NEW YORK!"
Personally, I hate leaving ticks of the clock on the field
I was happy they were trying to do something. They took timeouts on D to make sure they had some time to make something happen. They were getting the ball back after the half, so if they could have at least made a field going in, they had a chance at getting back in the game. Of course, that fumble wound up taking them out, but its a chance worth taking once in a while.
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
I should point out,
though it should be obvious, that I mean ticks of the clock before halftime. If it’s a close game, I don’t mind taking a knee in our territory, but I do like to see a bit of that killer instinct.
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
My conversation at the TV
Nice 16 yard completion to the 34. About 45 seconds on the clock.
Me: Spike the ball!
tick tock
Me: SPIKE THE BALL!
tick tock
Me: SPIKE THE F*CKING BALL!!!!!
Eli should have spike the ball. Call a play and settle everyone down. I liked them trying to score some points in that spot. If they get FG they’re only down 7 and getting the ball to open the 2nd half.
TITO!!!
Really?
First off, it was 55 seconds.
2nd? No. It was a great idea, from the 15 yard line after the unsportsmanlike by the Saints. Made a nice play to get to the 35.
But….like the 3rd down deep balls before in the game, the other thing I didn’t like was not spiking the ball on that play (which resulted in that sack and FF).
You spike the ball, gather thoughts and move on. Don’t take 20 seconds to run the no huddle, especially in that noise.
It resulted in Eli not noticing the safety creeping up, then THAT happened.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 20, 2009 7:06 AM EDT up reply actions
I think too much
is being made of the injuries here. I think the intention was always to try and get pressure with the front four, even with Boley and Canty and Ross on the field. The starting front four was healthy on that first drive and they got no pressure. Healthy LBs and DBs might have helped a little in coverage, but a team that is unable to generate any pressure is likely to lose against good teams. What I also saw was a pass rush that seemed frozen by play action. More than once I watched Osi stop dead in his tracks when Brees faked the handoff.
I agree
Everyone honestly believes without the injuries are defense would of magically started applying pressure. It wasn’t that we missed out on opportunities we had 0 pressure the entire game. It was awful and our defensive front is severely overrated.
by Giantsfan77 on Oct 19, 2009 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions
And to everyone saying this is only one game
This was honestly the first legit football team we have faced this year. We are in the real part of our schedule and things could be a lot worse in the next few weeks.
by Giantsfan77 on Oct 19, 2009 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions
We have backup LB's on the field.
Clark and Blackburn are slow, slower than Pierce.
Boley and probably Sintim and probably Kehl (I think he was relegated to ST duty cuz of HIS injury) if they play, make this a much faster unit…ESPECIALLLY BOLEY.
Not enough can be made how good this guy is for the Giants. They are gonna miss him the time he misses.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 20, 2009 7:08 AM EDT up reply actions
Nicks
Liked how the DB coming up the right sideline couldn’t catch up with him on the long catch and run.
And I like how the media is assuming the Saints are going to be in the NFC Championship game, just like the #1 seed in the NFC has been the last two years.
Do not listen to what the sports media has to say
they are awful, Peter King gushed how a Saints Vikings NFC championship game would be the best ever. It’s week 6. I don’t why I even read Peter King he’s just like everyother idiot in the media he just jumps on the bandwagon week in week out and oppenly roots for Brett Favre.
Bring them to the swamp in January...
There is no doubt in my mind that even with the weather we had yesterday in NJ that would have been an entirely different game. Maybe we still lose but no way do they torch us for 48 points.
I hate dome football with a passion. Their team is tailor made to play inside and if they gain home field advantage for the playoffs they will be tough to beat. I would love nothing more than a rematch in mid January at Giants stadium 15 degrees/50mph winds/freezing rain.
....
And Eli would play so much better in the terrible weather. /sarcasm
by Giantsfan77 on Oct 19, 2009 10:08 AM EDT up reply actions
See: Packers, Green Bay
NFC Championship.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 20, 2009 7:09 AM EDT up reply actions
Domenik Hixon
the Giants suddenly have a dynamic KR/PR again
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 19, 2009 10:48 AM EDT reply actions
What bothered me most
Was the complete lack of emotion on the defensive side of the ball. As a Giants fan, I think we are all “defense first” fans, and seeing the Giants play atrocious defense is just painful to watch.
I’d rather see them lose 10-6 because of inept offense than lose the way they did yesterday.
They looked completely unprepared on defense, and completely uninspired. How they respond Sunday night against Arizona will speak volumes about this team.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Oct 19, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions
I agree 100% Jim
Successful Giants teams have always taken pride in playing hard nosed defense. Stop the run and attack the passer at all costs.
I agree there was no emotion, guys were pointing fingers at each other, and Osi and Tuck were laughing on the sidelines after getting burnt for the 6th TD pass of the game.
Sometimes you have to just laugh.
That moment actually cheered me up a little.
"We were very much aware of that. There was a lot of phone call-type things going on in the room." -- Tom Coughlin
Don’t forget!!!! This is the 4TH ROAD GAME IN 5 WEEKS AGAINST A TEAM OFF A BYE IN THEIR BUILDING-AND AWAY GAMES ACROSS THE COUNTRY TOO-NOT PHILLY OR D.C. BUT DALLAS-K.C.-N.O. AND TAMPA. THAT IS NOT AN EASY SCHEDULE TO PLAY A TEAM AS GOOD AS THE SAINTS IN THEIR BUILDING.
while I see the point you are trying to make, I don’t agree, only because the Giants talk so much about how they don’t get respected, blah blah blah, and for the defense to essentially stay on the bus yesterday is inexcusable. If you want to be a championship team, it takes effort every Sunday. Yesterday there was no effort on defense.
Blueshirt Banter: Covering the New York Rangers
Big Blue View: Unofficial New York Giants blog
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Oct 19, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree w/ Map
I was very tentative about this game. Three road games in a row is a lot of travel. Four in five weeks is even worse. And to have three in a row against lowly competition, then face a healthy, well-rested high-flying offense in what might be the best home-field advantage in the NFL (this year, anyway) is a whole lot to handle.
Our competition isn’t going to let up, but things will start to get more favorable for us. We’re home in prime time against the Cardinals (I know they can score, but I really think they’re going to pay for our embarrassment this week), then we have short travel to Philly, then home against the Chargers, before we finally get our bye.
There’s never an excuse to lose, but we weren’t going to go 16-0. And as the refs were keen on killing our momentum and crediting theirs, this loss seems a lil more understandable. But know this gentlemen, we’re going to be firing on all cylinders soon.
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Forgotten
Have you forgotten our road to the Super Bowl was 4 road games in 5 weeks? Two trips involving further travel then going to KC.
Nope, haven't forgotten
but every single one of those games was “must-win”. There’s a diff air when it’s win or go home. I know everyone wants to point to that and the 19-3 road record going in, but there were 3 losses in there.
I’m not intending to make excuses for them, but I was apprehensive going into this game since week 3 for the aforementioned reasons, and it proved to be warranted. And I’m trying to make sense of the mess that was yesterday.
I also don't agree
We had a tough game in Dallas. Our next 3 games were basically scrimmages. We’re 6 games into the season. I don’t use travel ‘fatigue’ this early in the season as an excuse.
Saints coming off their bye also isn’t an excuse. Coming into yesterday’s game the Saint had lost 3 straight and 5 of last 6 games after their bye week.
Never an excuse
but for my above statement, I can understand it a bit better. I’m not hitting the panic button just yet.
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions
Dallas game is ALWAYS a tough game.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 20, 2009 7:10 AM EDT up reply actions
see that button over there to the left of the 'a' key?
it’s not your friend…
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
WHAT??
WHY?? WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?? I’M JUST TRYING TO MAKE MY POINT WITH MORE EMPHASIS THAN THE REST OF YOU BECAUSE MY POINT HAPPENS TO BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN YOURS LOL.
"We were very much aware of that. There was a lot of phone call-type things going on in the room." -- Tom Coughlin
Sheridan is no spags
I’ve been saying this to myself the whole season, but have not come on here and voiced my opinion, because it felt silly to ruffle feathers when we were undefeated with the number one D. But bill Sheridan’s defensive philosophy worries me. He blitzes WWAAYY less than spags did, and thusly pressure is not constantly bought. His feeling is we have so much talent on the front four, that he can afford to forego the blitz. Well that’s not the answer obviously. And before we jump ship on our front four, let’s keep in mind that usually its 4 versus 5 or 6, the odds are stacked against the d-line, and good teams have good lines, and good blocking backs and TE’s. We still have talent there, although I won’t yet put osi and Justin over indy’s rushing ends as far as pass rush is concerned.
But back to Sheridan. Wasn’t the bill of sale on this guy that he had the same philosophy as spags, that we wouldn’t be missing a step once he left, that Sheridan might tweak a thing or 2 but it would be the same D, with a blitz heavy package? What happened to that? Where is our blitzes? Why does it seem like we can’t disguise our blitzes, like they all seem to be right up the middle and telegraphed? Where’s the safety blitz, where are my corners coming off the sides, where the hell is the 5-1-5 that we were all so eager to see? What are we waiting for sintim and canty back before utilizing this? And if they never come back do we never use it? Where are the stunts between osi and tuck, tuck and kiwi, etc? Where is the bull rush, where are my 4 man fronts with kiwi, tuck, osi and tollefson? Let the fucking wolves loose!!!!
Pardon my french, but I’m trying to make a point. We have the talent on this D to get it done. Injuries or no, let’s stop making excuses for this D, they need to get it done. This was a wake up call, and I hope the D, and the rest of the team, have been awoken.
by wilddre22 on Oct 19, 2009 11:05 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Agreed, so far, he's not
But Spags has been lit up, too. It’s all about how he adapts from here. I keep telling myself (despite my better judgement) that maybe, just maybe, there is evil genius here at work and they don’t want to show their hand on either side of the ball unto they absolutely have to. I never want to settle for a loss, but our ultimate goal is to hoist the Lombardi this year. To do so, we’ll most likely see this team again. Philly really had us figured out by the playoffs rolled around. So maybe they’re holding back. Maybe. I hope.
by YankeeDudeL on Oct 19, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
In all fairness
Everyone is different, even if the blueprint has the same foundation. Sheridan is no Spags and vice versa. Look no further than our rivals, the Eagles. McDermott is no Jimmie Johnson (RIP)! Aside from what may seem like similarities, there is still a learning curve and adjustments that all have to overcome.
To keep it into perspective, Sheridan may want to do more, but with what? Injuries play a role in what teams want or can do. Just for an example, what Blackburn can do, Boley can do better, and in all phases. This in turn can help predetermine what AP can do. It has a rippling effect throughout the entire D. This doesn’t even include Canty and Phillips absence!
Agreed Hootman
But here’s my point: what if we don’t get these guys back? let’s say worse case scenario, canty is never healthy all year, plays sporadiacally, and ditto for Aaron Ross, Boley, the like. obviously forget about KP. so does that mean then we NEVER open up this D, and see what they can do? if we spiral and say lose the next 2 heading into the bye, do you keep it the same and stand pat?
Even when we were winning, we weren’t dominating persay. if a team had a 3rd and 7, we gave up 5. drive stalled, D did it’s job, great. but did we dominate? did tuck rip through a double team and smack the QB?
I just hope tom and co. don’t stand pat to the point where it becomes detrimental. maybe Rouse hasn’t showed enough to warrant more time, but i think the kid has some talent to maybe warrant a look. even if you don’t want him as a full time starter, use what talents he does have. he has the body of a linebacker, and his scouting reports state that he’s good against the run. Then use him as a roving LB, put him in the box, and let him cover a zone, or come up to stop the run and fill a gap. Even if it is just on a 3rd down, if Clark ain’t cutting it, or whoever, then let’s try something new.
we may need to rip up this new blueprint….
The D-Line failed him.
Maybe Tuck’s injury caught up with him a bit?
We don’t think of it cuz he’s played well the past 2 weeks…but this is an injury that’s gonna affect him all year, maybe it finally did?
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 20, 2009 7:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Well guys..
We just plain stunk on Defense..all facets…Just plain stunk…and there was no excuse for Bradshaw to miss that blitz blocking instruction from Eli..He said he couldn’t hear..My ass..Every QB in the damn league uses their mouth and hand signals to re-direct the blocking assignments..He simply fell asleep.
The referees stunk, but we all know they have all season..This group is “flag happy”..they invent penalties..but that’s no excuse for how we played on defense..The only Coaches that don’t deserve wet willies is believe or not Gilbride and the special teams Coaches, which is pretty much due to the fact we have Hixon back again. TC and Sheridan deserve their wet willies this week..I can’t believe the plan Sheridan came in with and that Coughlin would permit it..Like I said yesterday on the game thread, this was the worst Giants defensive performance I have ever seen..47 years, never witnessed that..they stunk.
Over-Rated D Line
The Giants D-line is extremely overrated. Starting with Osi. Is there a defensive player in the league more overrated than Osi? His numbers or lack of numbers speak volumes. And his ego. Note to Osi. You’re not as good as you think. There’s about 8-10 D ends in the league that are better.
Our Super Bowl victory was great. IMO it’s now coming back to haunt us. The Giants coaching staff and players feel we can put pressure on opposing QBs rushing only 4. We can’t and we don’t. It been painfully obvious but as fans we haven’t truly looked past the wins.
Last season Spags seemed to blitz less and less. This season under Sheridan blitz packages are an after thought.
On my part there’s not lots of panic because we lost one game. There is concern because I don’t think we’re as good defensively as portrayed by the media. Currently, our offense under Eli is much better than our defense.
Last season
Spags sold out completely with the blitz, having to overuse it due to no pressure from the front four (have you forgot about the Philly play-off game, where they sent tons of people at McNabb and he calmly picked apart the Giants D?). However, yesterday was definitely way too little in the way of blitz, regardless of Brees success against the blitz, fact is he had all day to make tea, sit in his lazy-boy, and then get up for a good 1 minute stretch before throwing. I am hyperboling here just a whole bunch, but my god he had all day to throw.
whenever
you see your guys all around the QB but never touching him, you’re in for bad things
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 19, 2009 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions
agreed on all points
I wonder if they change things up defensively this week. Because if they watch film of the Cards and thinks they can get good pressure with 4 do they stay with the same sceme so fitz and Boldin don’t torch them? I can’t kill them for that philisophy because it protects you against getting beat deep, (well not yesterday), but for the most part. I do agree with you though Frank they should look to change their approach a bit.
I'm very proud of everyone
No one’s making excuses, just taking the lumps and getting ready to do better next week. But since everyone is taking the high road, I just need to vent for a minute.
WTFingH is wrong w/ you Hoch-a-loogie? I was defending your donkey ass last year once you cost San Diego their game against Denver. Everyone makes mistakes, right? And what thanks do we get? You and your boys destroyed any chance we had at making this a game. After Hixon gets taken down roughly by his shoulder (amazing how clearly you saw that), you call the Giants kicking team twice for facemasks for doing the exact same thing? Not to mention the phantom holds, the incidental PI when feet got tangled up (even the guys in the booth knew that wasn’t PI, then getting us for offensive PI when hardly any contact was made and it was initiated by the defender. Not to mention all the holds and blocks in the back you didn’t call against them. This was more than poor officiating. It was clear you were swaying the game in their favor.
Eh, I don’t feel any better.
and the fumble?
A non-Giants fan buddy text me during the review “that’s a fumble. Giants ball”.
I’ll paraphrase Ed Cockerly explanation. Player bobbled the ball but maintained control.
I forgot about the OPI. Since when is it an illegal pick when the receiver runs his route?
Oh yeah, forgot about how that fumble played out
I at first thought he was down, too. But the video tape showed the ball was coming out. Goodell really needs to do something about this bozo, and the rest of the crew. But, of course, it will go unmentioned.
I agree whole-heartedly with everything you say
But it still wouldn’t have made a difference in the W-L column.
It definitely would have been closer. 10 pt swing at the end of the 1st half (Up a fg, and no NO td), and the blatant holding on a 3rd and 10 that let them prolong a drive.
But the way we were playing opposed to how they were playing, we were going to be beat anyways.
Hochuli needs to be suspended though. That officiating sucked
Agreed, we were getting that L regardless
of any officiating. I was hoping that venting might make me feel better. Didn’t work. Kicking tail from here on out will, though.
More Wet Willies
The D line play was terrible. We’re also forgetting the 3 Encroachment penalties. No excuses for that.
But on a positive note....
Nicks became the third different Giant receiver in six games to top 100 yards in catches (too bad there are no “quality” receivers, and only quantity instead of quality), and in battles between non-divisional teams that will be in the playoffs, it’s not the winner of the first meeting that advances, but winner of the second.
Luck
I wore my “lucky” #91 jersey AND my “lucky” NYG Cap. SO much for that.
BTW, In 1979, the SB Champions Pittsburgh Steelers went to San Diego and were completely embarrased by Dan Fouts and Air Coryell. 35-7. The Chargers completely picked apart the fabled Steel curtain and made them look real old.
The Steelers went on to beat the LA Rams in the SB to win their 4th SB. Just Saying…
I dont have time to read the earlier posts
but where the heck was corey webster going on that touchdown given up in the first half? i think it was colston who caught it, webster started going towards the sideline when the ball was clearly being thrown in his direction.. leaving i think CC brown to get embarrassed. what was worse was that nobody was going in that direction, so why was webster?
The Giants were playing Zone
Webster was playing his zone, while C.C was playing his. C.C was there and he didn’t make a play
Man, forgot about that, too
Zone or no zone, he wasn’t protecting anything and Brees made us pay for that.
Giants vs Saints
The coaching staff deserves 3/4 or the blame for that game
Honestly, I had my doubts about this game. The Saints did have a bye week, Sean Payton is a offensive mastermind. Put two and two together and the defense was at a HUGE disadvantage.
Bill Sheridan takes most of the blame. How in the hell do you come up with that game plan (And how does Coughlin aprove of this) knowing that the Saints are already at a HUGE advantage?
Sheridan’s defense is looking a hell of alot similar to Lewis’ defense, VERY SOFT. Why on God’s green earth did he have the defense playing zone ALL GAME LONG? And no blitz to be seen anywhere. You seen what the Jets did to Brees, blitz the hell out of him. Yes they lost, but that was because of the many turnovers they had. So why did Sheridan choose to blitz as little as possible and play zone all day?
Maybe he had faith in our front four, and maybe the Saints were using maximum protection. If the latter, that is why you blitz. Blitz and play man to man, thats how Spags led us to the superbowl, and the coaching staff said we’d keep Spags scheme and pholosify (excuse my horrilbe spelling but im kind of ticked right now). I don’t know what the hell that was on sunday, but it sure as hell wasn’t The Newyork Football Giants defense

by 
















