Advice to Brandon Jacobs: Remember who you are
Ralph Vacchiano has a great post detailing Brandon Jacobs' frustration with his inability to break loose thus far in 2009.
Here is a snippet.
"I’m just being patient and trying not to get too frustrated," Jacobs said. "Frustration is very much upon me, I’m going to be honest."
OK, so he’s frustrated. I think we get that. But what’s wrong? Why is he struggling, when Bradshaw - - behind the same line and against the same defenses - - is having such an impressive year?
"This year, people know what we like to do," Jacobs said. "And Ahmad is more … he can bounce around in those little creases and cracks and make a lot of big plays. Do I have the ability to do that? Yes. If I try to make plays like that, because I’m 265, 275 pounds, I’m not supposed to be doing that. Get it up there, hit into somebody, that’s what people want to see me do. If I don’t do it, I get criticized, if I do do it, I get criticized. I can’t win.
"Right now my stats aren’t very good, and people want to know why. That’s why," Jacobs added. "Because I have the ability to make plays with my feet, but when I try to, it’s the worst thing. I’m scum of the earth when I do that."
Ralph asked the right question, and to be honest I don't like Jacobs' answer. I don't want to hear him talk about patience any more. I don't want to hear him talk about bouncing around. I don't want to see him stutter-step at the line of scrimmage any more and look for a place to go.
I do not think his health is an issue at all. I want to see him hit the line of scrimmage with authority. If there isn't a hole I want to see him lower his shoulder and push the pile for a couple of yards. I want to see him punish defenses, not acquiesce to them.
In other words, I want to see him stop messing around and start running like Brandon Jacobs.
0 recs |
121 comments
|
Comments
I was at the game
on Sunday and would say two things in Jacobs defence.
1) 3 carries inside the 5 for 4 yards is going to hit the average – we have already flogged to death that we cannot run Jacobs up the gut in short yardage situations (ie the Redskins game).
2) There were too many calls for Jacobs to be running East to West which resulted in no gain or a loss as he does not have the inital burst to turn the corner (which Bradshaw can) which again hits the average.
Jacobs as we all know is at his best between the Tackles against non short yardage defences. That way he can get to the hole and then use his strength when he is into the secondary.
This is based on the one game I have seen – but it seems to me that Jacobs is no longer the short yardage back and once we stop using him as such his average will improve.
by G Fan in England on Oct 13, 2009 9:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
he is a short yardage back
Who has made a career out of turning short yardage runs into LONG runs by breaking tackles and steam rolling secondary personnel
by 732jerseyP on Oct 13, 2009 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not any more in my view
The Eagles playoff game and the Redkins/Raiders games showed us that in short yardage situations where the D has 5 or 6 DL, so there is not a natural hole for him to run through, he does not have the quickness to hit any sort of gap to break the line of scrimmage.
By the time BJ gets to the line the DL have had time to react and stop him cold – compare that to Bradshaw’s TD on 4th down against the Raiders – he hit the hole quickly before it closed – if BJ runs that play he is stopped short.
Yes he was good in short yardage at the start of his career, but he is now more of between the 20’s RB than inside the 20’s guy.
by G Fan in England on Oct 13, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
disagree
he would hit the gaps quicker if he ran through it with reckless abandoment like he has done every year except this one.
Thats the whole point and what made him a special RB. He would hit the holes b4 they closed and DLs used to arm tackle him and be would break through it. He doesn’t even give himself that opportunity anymore because he is stutter stepping himself into nothing and his taken out low b4 he can even get the motor going.
by 732jerseyP on Oct 13, 2009 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I couldn't agree with you MORE
I agree with your sentiments 100%
Everybody expects him to get the ball in short yardage and having their D stack with 5 or 6 on the line or 8 or 9 in the box will not give enough of an opening for him…plus he was never quick enough to get to & through the hole, esp. with him starting 5 yards behind LOS, Defenses are just to well prepped for it & he doesn’t have a quick enough motor like Bradshaw to zip thru that hole…
It’s been blatantly obvious when you watch the film…
Opus smart , lascivio magis , intereo gauisus...
by 27Tango on Oct 13, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
AMEN - and this meme is really #(*$*ing annoying.
Brandon Jacobs’ problem? Kevin Freaking Gilbride. I don’t care if you’re Brandon Jacobs or Walter Payton – if everyone in the stadium knows you’re coming, even the Raiders can stop you. Solution? More Eli.
I left my swagger in my other pants.
by HughG16 on Oct 13, 2009 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Give me a break
The Giants just scored 44 points and had 483 yards of offense, and you want to bitch about Gilbride? Sorry, but that is just absolutely, totally, completely ridiculous. The Giants’ offense is ranked second in the league with 417.4 yards a game, and they are second in the league in total points. Killing the offensive coordinator when the team is performing like that is utter nonsense!
by Ed Valentine on Oct 13, 2009 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ed I agree
The issue here is that when Jacobs is in the backfield especially between the 20’s, the defence crowds the box because they do not want to give up 6,7,8 yards on a running play. This does make the passing game more effective as evidenced by Eli’s stats.
However, you do still have to run the ball with Jacobs to keep the defence honest. So if Jacobs is getting stuffed at the line and we continue running with Jacobs he becomes the perfect decoy for 10+ yard passing plays.
Someone commented that Bradshaw does not get the same respect by the defence. This is true as on several occasions on Sunday you could see from the formation that if Bradshaw could reach the corner he had an easy ten yards – you only have to look at his 10 yard average with a 19 longest that he was making good yards on most plays.
What am I saying – Jacobs is still an unique back, but he is now no longer as effective in certain situations, so Gilbride needs to consider other plays/players on short yardage plays.
by G Fan in England on Oct 13, 2009 6:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good point
I think things may loosen up for Jacobs as the season progresses … as teams get the message that the Giants can beat them other ways.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 13, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jacobs has not changed and is running no different. The difference is how teams are defending him. they are loading the box and forcing sideline running outside running. Hence Bradshaw doing so well. The team is winning and passing game flourishing all because of Jacobs sacrafice. he will again be a big factor as season goes on.
Find out what NFL players think about Limbaugh as potential owner.
Rush Limbaugh an NFL owner: Hell No!!! http://bit.ly/7HDhj
"Don't Be Afraid to Stand on a Pile of 'No's' for one 'Yes'"
by curiousg87 on Oct 13, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rush Limbaugh an owner???
The league would be testing the Rams on a daily basis for drugs!!
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nah, Rush is pretty hardcore about preventing people from using drugs
you know, unless that person is himself
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
by cjmulrain on Oct 13, 2009 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm laughing loudly.
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 14, 2009 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How Ironical
People have been bringing this topic up since the season started and everyone else who knew better kept saying “just wait until next game” or “he’s gonna break out the next game” etc.
It’s ironic that this article has been written now as some kind of rallying call for B. Jacobs to get his act together when I think the author has been one of the people on this board that wasn’t worried about B. Jacobs running in the beginning of the season.
Anybody who can see realizes that Jacobs is not running the same way and is trying to be a running back I don’t think he can ever be. He doesn’t have the tools to do this. He is too damn slow at the beginning of his run and needs to break loose a couple of yards before he starts running downhill.
by 732jerseyP on Oct 13, 2009 9:12 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i feel him a little
We criticized Ron Dayne all the time for just putting his head down and hitting the line without looking for a block. I’m of the opinion that he’s running smarter, and he certainly hasn’t been ineffective. I think the D’s are keying on in a bit, and despite his stats he is still vital for setting up Bradshaw’s runs and the playaction, and I think he’s been doing that. It reminds me of the Pats during the their first Super Bowl runs, they didn’t run the ball well at all, but still ran 30 times a game and it helped their total offense
by queler on Oct 13, 2009 9:15 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly.
Regardless of his effectiveness, and he’ll likely never be totally ineffective behind this OL, that part of the offense MUST exist for any other part to succeed.
We talk a lot about him not getting his YPC because of his altered running style. Well defensive attention is also a major cause. That attention helps make AB look great. That attention is a huge reason Eli has the top NFC passer rating right now.
Frankly I don’t care how he runs or if he only gets 2.7 YPC. As long as he is considered a threat this offense will thrive.
And hey, if any team makes the mistake of not considering him a threat, enjoy the show.
by Jaybat on Oct 13, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We criticized Dayne because he went down when someone looked at him 'bad'
not because he plowed into the hole. If he plowed into the hole, it would have showed something. Dayne’s problem, or more acurately my problem with Dayne, was that he did not plow into the holes, he did not lower his shouler and scrape an extra half-yard out of a two yard run. Dayne went down on initial contact, sometimes it seemed as if he went down in anticipation of initial contact.
Jacobs does not have this issue. If Bradshaw ever gives him grief, he should just say “Derrick Ward” in reply. Bradshaw gets 3 out of every 4 yards because of Jacobs.
by StubsNY on Oct 13, 2009 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
IMO, you're
right about Dayne’s running style, Stubs. And, yes, to date this year and to a certain extent, that’s how BJ is running (except for the falling down on initial contact part.) Dayne used to hem and haw (in a physical sense) when he ran, very tentative, etc.
by blue gonz on Oct 13, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i dunno what Dayne you guys were watching
To my it always seemed like he thought he could just put his head down and move the pile like he did in college but had no success running like that in the NFL
by queler on Oct 13, 2009 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd say he ran the way you describe after he left
the Giants and was a bit more successfu. i wouldn’t bet on my memory, though. Maybe I’m confusing him with another one of their RB Big Ten # 1 pick busts? There was the guy from Michigan or Michigan State who never quite cut it with the Giants but did really well with the Raiders as a pure straight ahead power back.
by blue gonz on Oct 13, 2009 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
jarrod bunch?
Now a Hollywood actor?
by hopeforthefuture3 on Oct 13, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think
you’re thinking of Tyrone Wheatley. He did play pretty well for the Raiders after he left us. Dayne never fully blossomed, but he did play a little better after we got rid of him. The Giants problem with backs in those days, was that they didn’t devise schemes to let the backs run to their strengths. Despite his build, for example, Dayne was not suited to be a Bettis type battering ram in the pros.
by Tucker Fredrickson on Oct 13, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, it was Wheatley.
And you’re right about the Giants wanting him and Dayne to do things tgey couldn’t.
by blue gonz on Oct 13, 2009 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dayne used to stutter-step like mad.
He never got to the hole – that was his problem!
I left my swagger in my other pants.
by HughG16 on Oct 13, 2009 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
from what I remember
he was always an in between tackles half back, but Fassel screwed him over trying to convert him to a short yardage back, which was not his running style. After TC took over they gave him another chance and he played all right, definitely better than the Fassell regime, but we didn’t really see the true player he was in NY. He did better when he went on to Denver & Texas – even though it was short lived… but he was definitely mostly misused in the Giants’ system
Opus smart , lascivio magis , intereo gauisus...
by 27Tango on Oct 13, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you are right. Defenses are still keying on him. I think once Eli starts getting more respect, seeing that he is carving defenses up, Jacobs will roll. I also still think Bradshaw is a good compliment to Jacobs and is not as good if he is the feature back.
by JRSu1 on Oct 13, 2009 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ron Dayne never lived up to his potential as a Giant
He tripped over his own feet before even reach the line of scrimmage..Jacobs..I have my concerns but he is a far better running back than Dayne when he plays his game.
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Advice to Jacobs
Have OJ Anderson give him a call. We (Giants fans) over analyzed OJ to death, and he turned out pretty good for us.
Jacobs will be fine, if everyone would just leave him alone. He needs to stop thinking about things, and just hammer.
by Billhu on Oct 13, 2009 9:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
OJ would have been in the HOF
if he hadn’t played for such a lousy team before coming to the Giants. He was nothing short of sensational his first years in the league.
by blue gonz on Oct 13, 2009 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I always refer to our OJ as OJA..
Wouldn’t want to get him confused with the murderer..and yes I think OJA belongs in the HOF.
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
as a saints fan.......
i’ll tell you, BJ scares the heck out of me.
by r c a on Oct 13, 2009 10:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i personally think hes just trying to stay healthy
hes been very tentative and cautious on every run, settingling for a 3-4 yard gain instead of blowing someone up for an extra 3-4. if this is what hes trying to do, im fine with that. as long as hes healthy late in the season when the weather gets bad and we really need the running game to be strong, i say keep it up BJ. we all know what hes capable of, leave the man alone.
by GiantsReignSupreme on Oct 13, 2009 10:16 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Against the Raiders
He did have a couple of trade mark runs where he picked up extra yardage after inital contact.
I think we will have a better understanding of where BJ and the Giants are after the next 3 games in terms of not only his stats but more importantly the won-loss column.
by G Fan in England on Oct 13, 2009 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I completely agree
I think he’s trying to stay healthy, too — he can tear up defenses later when they’re battered up
by arby49 on Oct 13, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have been saying this all season..
He is running too upright, he is trying to cut outside..He needs to lower his shoulder and start pounding defenses..He’s 270 freaking pounds and is trying to be a finesse speedster, which he is not..He needs to pound the heck out of the defense and wear them out, then he’ll get his yardage..He has to get back to being a “bowl you over” running back..right up the gut hit ‘em punish ’em..His yards typically come in the third and fourth quarters after he’s wore them out..It is the law of physics with his size..running right up the gut full speed and scaring people..I don’t care who you are, when you have 270 pounds of shoulder pads running full tilt at you, you are going to think twice about taking that on..He needs to get back to that style of running.
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 10:26 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
AMEN Brother
finally somebody with 20/20 vision who can see what’s really going on here…he’s flat out not running the way he used to!!!
by 732jerseyP on Oct 13, 2009 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
i feel for him
5 and 0 team and still complaining go back to the post from when camp started and look at the posts ie teams are playing the giants differently because we have no recievers well they are starting to notice our wr corps it will start to open up when a good team plays the giants 8 in the box stop the run throw over the top defense backs off b jak runs thru a 6 man box back to normal
by lou b on Oct 13, 2009 10:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My Advice to Jacobs....
Don’t read the papers or go online b/c everyone is making too much of this story.
Here we go…back to talking about Jacobs a week removed from a very effective game vs. KC…averaging 4+ yards per carry.
I guess if Jacobs is not averaging 5 yards per carry there’s something wrong with him….I supposed that’s one of the pitfalls of having experienced so much success in his career.
I don’t remember these articles in ’07 when Bradshaw was our leading RB in the playoffs….and Jacobs was averaging a paltry 3 or so yards / carry.
I don’t think people can fathom how dominant our O line was last year I mean to have 2 1,000 yard rushers was very special…they were opening up holes that my grandmother could run through.
Is Jacobs the same guy he was when he came into the league no….but if you guys remember he was in the same boat as AB. Jacobs was 2nd fiddle to Tiki and I remember wanting him to get the majority of the carriers b/c of his durability and punishing running style. But they saved him so he can be the work horse that he is today…and as Giant fans after a 5 games I think Jacobs deserves more credit.
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
by andiamo708 on Oct 13, 2009 10:32 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
i wont make excuses for Big Boy
But ill say this. Anyone with tivo or dvr that hasn’t deleted the game Sunday yet, go back and watch the run plays. Not just big boys, but ahmad’s too. You’ll see 2 things. One, when Brandon is in the game, the raiders have 8 men, 9 times out of 10, in the box. Sometimes 9. Now I only analyzed the 1st half of the game, but I’m pretty sure that trend continued in the second half when the g men were up and in run mode. When ahmad was in the game, the box was not stacked. There were 7 or less in the box. When ahmad did face 8, he was not breaking off the huge runs, with the exception of the 20 yard score, where in my opinion, his sharp cut and burst made that play successful. Jacobs probably wouldn’t have been able to make that same cut.
The second thing I noticed is the formations they run out of. Almost EVERYTIME Jacobs ran in the first half, it was out of the fricking I formation. Usually a strong I too, with only one wideout and an extra blocker in. When ahmad was in, he ran out of a lot of passing sets, thus probably dictating why he usually saw 7 as opposed to 8 everytime he touched it. Ahmad was running out of 3 and 4 receiver sets man!
Listen, say what you want to say about the big boy. This post is not meant to make excuses for him, because in an unbiased manner, when watching the tape over, I also saw instances when Brandon did stop, stutter step, tippy toe, or whatever you wanna call it and not hit holes hard. All I’m saying is let’s keep in mind that defenses play these 2 guys differently, and that maybe Mr gilbride should shake up the playbook a little bit, and not telegraph brandons runs. Because we keep saying on here what he can’t do, what he can’t do. I’ve watched him intently from his first preseason game as a giant. There is nothing that Brandon Jacobs can’t do! He can run outside, he can run inside, he can score inside the 5, he can run out of a 4 receiver set, he can cut it back, and the proof is on youtube and in your memories. Open up the damn playbook and let big boy loose!!!!
by wilddre22 on Oct 13, 2009 10:33 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Good analysis, except
I don’t think BJ was ever consistently good when it’s goal to go. Everything’s just too tight down there for a guy his size and style.
by blue gonz on Oct 13, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
he had 16 touchdowns his first 2 seasons
and no starts. he was specifically in only for short yardage, goal line, and tiki breathers. that’s why i laugh when i read here that he can’t get one yard, or score goal line possessions.
by wilddre22 on Oct 14, 2009 12:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Defence
wised up on how to stop him – that is why he is not as effective.
Just as the D has changed to play us we must now adapt to beat them.
by G Fan in England on Oct 14, 2009 3:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wild & G Fan
Good points. He was better at the goal line back then and not as good now.
by blue gonz on Oct 14, 2009 6:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
what's the difference
between the start of this season and the 4 game playoff run when bradshaw lead the team in rushing???
widdre22 makes a great point…KG is giving away the run and teams are stacking the box….just like they did in the playoffs…
"If you don't know what you're doing... just rush the quarterback" - LT
by andiamo708 on Oct 13, 2009 10:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Jacobs
Frankly, this is much ado about nothing. The team is 5-0. Jacobs has not been injured. We have effectively replaced Ward and possibly improved the situation. Mark my words, Jacobs style will get him into Dec and Jan games in better health than he has been for years. This will pay huge dividends when it is needed most. We need a bruiser during the frigid days in Giant Stadium. Not when Eli can shred defenses.
All in all, the proof about this team starts this week. We have the 2nd most difficult schedule here on in. Lets get the requisite 7 of 11 so we can get some home games in Jan.
by Nevets on Oct 13, 2009 10:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
In the words of Mike Singletary
“Just go out and hit ’em in the mouth”. That’s number one." If BJ just plays tough physical Giants football and the rest will take care of itself. Forget the stats, just do what you do. This is becoming such a soap opera. It’s a good thing Shockey smack talk will suck all the air out of the room this week, or this would go on and on.
by MJ20 on Oct 13, 2009 10:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
team B-Jake!
1. It’s probably difficult to slam full-tilt into 300+ pound defensive lineman 25-30 times a game. Probably not a bad idea to have a look around now and then.
2. Just like having Plax helped the run game, Jacobs helps the passing game… and Bradshaw. These things are complEmentary and synergistic.
3. The Giants have rushed for an average of 160 yards per game. So why are we wondering what’s wrong with the run game?
I also hate to see Jake slow up, kill his own momentum, ebcause it seems like he’s the only one who can, sometimes. But seriously, people. This guy is a tone-setter, a workhorse, and frankly, 3.6 avg. 5 games in is not bad for a primary back of his style.
Team B-Jake!
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 13, 2009 10:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
oh yeah and
they have the 4th-ranked run offense in the league but only the 9th-ranked pass offense… oh dear, what is so terribly wrong with our pass attack?
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 13, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BJ
Jacobs had one good gainer against Oakmess. On that play it was clear he ran it like he has the past two years. Just got his motor started and didn’t stop. I think he picked up about 9-10 yds on the play. I’d be shocked if he and the coaches aren’t comparing film from last year to this year’s style and telling him, “that’s the difference.” Of course, we don’t get paid for this. But it does seem he’s doing a lot of hemming and hawing at the initial point of contact, where last year he’d just blow right through it. The fact that he’s so aware of the criticism leads one to believe he’ll get this fixed before too long, hopefully against the ’Aints, and get our run game hitting on all cylinders.
by Low Country Giant on Oct 13, 2009 10:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
one good gainer?
2nd play of the game – 9 yard run(8 in the box)
Run that set up our first 1st and goal – 6 yards
With 10:10 in the 2nd quarter – 12 yard hard run up the middle where he ran over 2 raiders
That’s 3 big runs in the 1st half alone. Cmon let’s do the knowledge ppl.
by wilddre22 on Oct 13, 2009 11:37 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
even odds
Jacons trucks the * out of 1-2 Saints
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 13, 2009 10:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
p.s.
“Frustration is very much upon me?”
What is he, Hamlet?
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 13, 2009 11:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts
Jacobs is seeing a lot of 8 man fronts. He is waiting for a whole instead of just bashing. Not what we are used to but still very much getting the job done. Teams are game planning to primarily try and stop the big man. Leaving huge areas for us to exploit elsewhere. Is Jacobs the same runner as he was last year? No he is not but the Giants might be better off that way…1: he stays healthy, 2: teams will continue to gameplan for him, and if they don’t well then Brandon will run all over them.
by wangstu13 on Oct 13, 2009 11:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm just gonna say I don't like your stance on this Ed.
Jacobs is our boy. He’s clearly frustrated and I would rather see him be patient and find that huge gain than continue to just pound into the line and gain 3 yards. He’s right when he says he can make plays with his feet, because that’s how he’s always done it.
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 13, 2009 11:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
No Tito..He makes yardage
Because he is quick and weighs 270..The 270 being the key here..He is not a speedster..but he is big and quick and needs to get back to whacking people..The OL is opening up holes, but he is not taking advantage of them…yet..He’ll get it together..and to be honest he has pretty good stats..Just needs to get back to what he does best..wear them out and run like hell…Gilbride thinks he is trying to be perfect..I want to see him be wreckless..beat them down and run away.
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bobbi, here I goo again disagreeing on the style of another
Giant RB. I’d say BJ isn’t quick. It takes him time to get going, his cuts are more like lurches (but effective.) On the other hand, I’d call him amazingly fast for a guy his size. I could be wrong, but I think I recently saw a quote by a DB saying his 40 time was 4.4. How is that possibe for a guy who goes 270? It boggles the mind.
by blue gonz on Oct 13, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well Blue gonz..
This guy is a freak of nature..It takes him a bit longer to get his motor in overdrive, but once he does..watch out..that is why he needs to get back to running north and south, not east and west..
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jacobs
My only thought on Jacobs is the more I watch him this season the more I notice hesitation at the line of scrimmage that I don’t remember seeing before. Maybe that’s on him. Maybe teams are stuffing the box and giving him no openings to run. In the end, though, he is still doing enough to help this team. Even though it doesn’t seem like typical Jacobs.
by Ed Valentine on Oct 13, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the kicker (no, not Tynes lol), but Jacobs!
he is still doing enough to help this team. Even though it doesn’t seem like typical Jacobs.
This is what is important. Whatever is going on with him, and if his new approach still leads to team success, then this shouldn’t be an issue. Until it becomes a noticable team infection, effection or affection (which one, i’m not an Eng. major?lol), then the atypical Jacobs should just be what it is. A big back getting what he can, albeit, helping the cause as a team!
by Hootman on Oct 13, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Does anyone care about Jacobs point of view?
I mean the man has used his body as a battering ram for five years. He hits people really hard and he gets hit hard. Defenses want to hurt Brandon not tackle him. If that man wants to change his running style or figure out a way to lessen those collisions then by all means he should. How many years of playing does he have left? Three maybe four tops.
If Brandon had the same numbers but a couple of sportcenter moments then this would be a none issue. Everyone wants to see him hurt somebody and pretend he’s not flesh and bone. An article was posted with a link to a NY Times article detailing the rise of concussions in the NFL. How many times has Jacobs gotten hit and he has to run off the field to get his bearings?
I do not support any running back just banging into people as hard as he can no matter how much I would enjoy it I’m sure his family doesn’t. What we need is for Brandon to get good at whatever he’s trying to do with his rushing style and not just have batter himself into retirement.
by Major on Oct 13, 2009 12:12 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Major..Brandon's injuries
Have never come from hitting people..they have come from his tendency to run too upright. That leaves his legs open for a hit..They have to go low on him to tackle him so he needs to stay low to counter that, and level the boom on them. I don’t ever want to see an athlete get hurt…but he is leaving himself open to a low hit at his legs..that’s how he has been injured.
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know how low a 6' 4'' man can get!
Guys tackle him at the knees and ankles because if they try to “man up” they’re done(see B. Urlacher LB Chicago Bears). I agree with you on the actual injuries that caost him games but Jacobs gets popped a lot and there are many occasions when he’s dazed after a hit. I’ve never seen a back create as much force at the point of contact than Jacobs. The body can only take so much. I’m not against him protecting himself.
by Major on Oct 13, 2009 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I actually have this crazy idea
And Major, you did touch on it. Jacobs size to date only compare to the Nigerian Nightmare’s, whose career wasn’t that long. Is Jacobs subtle change in his approach for his own self preservation for a longer career? Keeping in mind, he just signed a 4 year contract that expires when he’s 30. The wrong Age for any RB!
Did Brandon have a psychological re-evaluation (playing style) of himself, not only to benefit himself, but he wants to honor the contract that he agreed to? Players do from time to time, especially RB’s, change their style to prolong their longevity.
I think Brandon has come to the point of crossroads in his career. Which road does he want to take? The usual, punish the poor soul that dares hit me head-on, or perhaps the road that he wants to reach the end in relatively good health?
by Hootman on Oct 13, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree Hootman
I think its part self preservation and part making it the full four years of his contract but also part pride in that I believe Jacobs wants to prove he can be a good back without plowing into any player in front of him. I think he deserves a chance to see if this style can work for him or maybe the talk pisses him off and he does what he’s always done.
by Major on Oct 13, 2009 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hootman and Major.
I made the same point a while back: namely, I can’t hold it against any RB who tries to prolong his career by avoiding contact and cited Franco Harris as an example of a guy who prolonged his career buy giving up on fighting for the extra yard and running out of bounds, etc. When Jim Brown did color, he criticized Franco roundly for it. I found that curious coming from Jimbo, who never (okay,rarely) threw a block when the opportunity presented itself.
Still, purely as a fan, I’d love to see Jake revert to his beast persona. It appeals to the savage, bloodthirsty part of me, like Ali Frazier III, or any Pacquiao fight where he gets hit and starts brawling (something he does less and less under Freddie Roach’s titelage.) That’s what Freddy used to do and you can see the results in his tremors and speech (Ali, too, for that matter-no one could take a punch like that guy, although a lot of fans labored under the delusion that he never got hit.)
by blue gonz on Oct 13, 2009 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blue
I would rather Jacobs trample people Laron Landry style but I want him to be functional and upright in 2032 for the 25 year 2007 SuperBowl team anniversary. LOL!
I agree with the boxing comparison 100%. I just hope that Brandon get this style together so this controversy can go away.
by Major on Oct 13, 2009 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
okoye was a kicker compared to jacobs
6’1" 253.
by wilddre22 on Oct 14, 2009 12:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
the defensive lineman of that day...
were about as big as Okoye. Very rarely were there 300lbers.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 14, 2009 6:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well you all make good points / opinions
The fact that he is 6’4" at 270 makes it tougher to get low..I’m 6’4" but am only 185-190 I would have been able to get low..but would also have been killed..I do think there is a bit a preservation here with Brandon (I prefer the term Brandon, versus “BJ”..that makes me hound-dog the wife..lol!!)…but he needs to somehow protect his legs..
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 2:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thinking about BJ's height, Bobbi,
it occurs to me that the only guy about that tall who ran straight up and was successful was Eric Dickerson. In fact the number of really good RBs who go over six-one, say, are way less than those who are shorter. Simson ran straight up most of the time, but lowered his shoulder when it was called for. He was fairly tall for an RB
by blue gonz on Oct 13, 2009 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes those guys could get low when needed but they were speed players
Brandon is 270…fast but vulnerable..Once he blows thru the line he is a very dangerous person..He is trying to go around it..Again his numbers are decent..but he was doing much better when blowing up the defensive line, then he gets into overdrive and crumples the secondary..Simpson (yuck) and Dickerson got out of the shute in high gear..Brandon takes a few more seconds to get rumbling.
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jacobs' influences?
To be honest, this isn’t the first time I’ve seen BJ run like this. His first few years in the league he had the same problem, prancing around at the line of scrimmage. Really, his last two seasons are the only two seasons I’ve seen him run the way he should be running — north to south and knocking over anything in his path. I think the other RBs on the roster might have something to do with it, like he forgets who he is and what works for him and tries to run more like them. Although I’m sure this isn’t the main root of the problem, it could have something to do with it.
by one-bar on Oct 13, 2009 2:07 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I could see that...
with Ward as his co-runner, their styles are more similar than a Jacobs-Bradshaw comparison. He should just not care about what everyone is saying and try to get back his running style from last year, and I think some play calling will help him as well. Especially since everyone game plans around here more this year than last. The coaches need to help him out in this regard and call his number when it’s not expected at times and not just during the ussual down scenarios
Opus smart , lascivio magis , intereo gauisus...
by 27Tango on Oct 13, 2009 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sniffle
that’s my … that’s my running back man sob
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 13, 2009 3:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Reply to all ... and to no one in particular
1. Yes, BJ looks a little more tentative this year, but any RB would if there is no hole because teams are stacking the box on obvious running downs – KG need to mix it up a bit more in the red zone (where is the alternating fade/post to someone like Barden split out wide ?). Just the use of more spread formations would open up the runs/draws quite a bit.
2. Ron Dayne was a flat out bust. He ran behind a mammoth OL at Cheese-State (many of whom were NFL caliber) an ran straight ahead fast (for a big man) to get into the secondary rather clean many times. He could not cut to save his life (BJ can). While Emmitt Smith ran with the most “determination” of any back I have ever seen, Dayne ran with the least. At #10 overall, a disaster (I’d rather have Crabtree …)
3. On BJ running too upright – if that’s his style, fine. The league is figuring out you don’t take him on high, and they will still go for knees-to-ankles no matter how much he gets a “lean” into his runs. His next stage of evolution is to learn to hurdle over those would-be ankle biters, and he can probably do that better with less lean.
4. What we could really use on the goal line is a back that can do a decent leap from about the 2 yard mark (AB ?). Too many bodies stacked up there for any runner to find even a crease sometimes.
by Shofner85 on Oct 13, 2009 3:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
the leap
I’ve never understood why nobody on the Giants seems to do that. I feel like Bradshaw has to be athletic enough to do it.
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
by cjmulrain on Oct 13, 2009 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
please don't put that in big boy's mind
we saw what happened when he was in the air week one against the skins. and last season he tried that foolishness and caught one. not for brandon.
by wilddre22 on Oct 14, 2009 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I said Bradshaw
not Jacobs. It just seems to me like lots of other teams have backs who leap over the line into the end zone fairly frequently, and I can’t remember the Giants had someone do that.
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
by cjmulrain on Oct 14, 2009 1:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right about the Giants never doing that, cj
They had a guy who was capable, too—Walker. I shudder when I see someone try it in the open field, though, remembering how it changed the career of the guy Wellington called the best athlete the Giants ever had, the CB who was the fasrtes guy on the team and kept asking for a chance to be a returner, name? (senior citizen brain cramp.)
by blue gonz on Oct 14, 2009 6:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LJ
Used to be really good at that.
I remember him winning a game for the Chiefs a few years back by going over the top when they were down by one on a two point conversion, it was pretty awesome.
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 14, 2009 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Decent leap
Hard to find these days, what with the height of the guys tring to stop the leap. I think Hershell Walker could still do it. Another Heisman Trophy bust and his trade to the Vikings gave the ‘boys the foundation of some of their SB teams (Jerry’s biggest coup.). When he was with the Giants, I noticed he neve tried to catch a pass with his feet on the ground. He’d always jump in the air for it. Now, after Olympic bobsledding, he’s going into MMA. Who would ever imagine that Dayne’s running style would evoke such dissimilar memories?
by blue gonz on Oct 13, 2009 4:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Is anyone really that concerned with Jacobs?
He may not be on pace for his 14 TD’s, tho there’s plenty of time to go. But he’s on pace to better his career total yardage numbers.
There are 2 things he’s not doing. One, break the 30 yarder or 2 that made his rushing totals high, and two, he’s not automatic from the goal line. Everything else, as in pounding the defense and giving the other guys in the running game tired defenders to run by, is still there.
Whoever says Jacobs is this year’s Plaxico…on the field (and of course, not nearly the whining..he has been getting teh ball 20+ times….so he has no reason to whine about touches, not like Jake is like that….) is correct. When teams see him out there, they charge the LOS like mad.
Ever realize why that Play action is so wide open? I say who cares about Jacobs lack of stats. I wouldn’t trade him for anything. He helps the team out that much. He’ll get his due, he’s healthy. That’s all I ask for.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 13, 2009 5:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is exactly why...
Pretty much every time I’ve seen Eli run a play action boot to the right (with Jacobs in there) he completes a 20+ yard pass. And this probably has to do a lot with him leading the league in that category.
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 14, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Too much pussy footing around...literally
I think Brandon has most definitely forgotten who he is. He is spending too much time trying to get to a sideline like Adrian Peterson, and too much dancing at the line of scrimmage. He needs to do what he has been doing in the past, and as was mentioned in the article…lower his shoulder and make defenders pay for getting in his way. That is what makes Jacobs the back that he is. Be the punisher, soften the D, and then in the 2nd half, make those big runs that we are used to. The twinkle toes sh!t is making me nuts!!!
by Bleeding_Blue on Oct 13, 2009 5:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A third thing he's not doing (thankfully).....
I know it’s a bit off topic, but since I still feel he’s helping the team out there and making other parts of it better by his being there, he also isn’t fumbling the ball all over the place. Considering the agressive style of both of the backs, the lack of turnovers is surprising and a major positive. It’s still a TEAM game, the team has been impressive, it’s 5-0, both the running and passing games have contributed, the defense has been good, and the Giants are creating far more turnovers than they’re giving up. All in all, while Jacobs isn’t having his most rewarding statistical year, nor has he been his most dominating, the team has been fine and in the greater scheme of things we’re really discussing more whether we’d like chocolate sprinkles AND a cherry on top of the sundae than anything else because there’s been so little to legitimately complain about. Mets fans should have such problems!
by Cranky50 on Oct 13, 2009 6:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Playbook
Maybe due to our lack of recent competition we haven’t really needed to open up the playbook. There are more runs that just i formation dive.
by wangstu13 on Oct 13, 2009 6:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
more truth.
teams getting film on the GInts is another thing Gilbride is always worried about, for better or worse.
I haven’t seen the whole Seubert pulling thing in a while, he’s one of the best in the game at that.
..."I predict...the Giants are #1"...
...."That's not a prediction meatman, that's a FACT OF LIFE"!.
---Carl
by FreeBradshaw on Oct 13, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jacobs is the foundation to the Giants Offense
Just think about the changes the Giants would need to make if Jacobs was not in the line up. Bradshaw is an explosive running back and Jacobs is a great Bull Dozer. The two together results in a superior and reliable Offense. Eli, you need to get into Jacob’s head and show him how to use the G Force.
by baazoo on Oct 13, 2009 6:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely..
We just need our “bulldozer” back..There is no way I would trade this guy for anybody..We are going into a tough part of our schedule and we need our “bulldozer” with a full tank of Diesel fuel…I think that is the crux of our commentary where Brandon is concerned here..At least mine. One thing I did notice is he is starting to catch the ball..He can be very dangerous to deal with on a swing pass with a full head of steam.
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 8:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It'd be great to see him make a receiver's catch
(i.e. while on a dead run.) What DB would want to take on that train?
by blue gonz on Oct 13, 2009 8:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Nobody in their right mind Blue..
Would want to take that load on..If Brandon found his hands and can catch a ball now then I feel sorry for anybody that tries to tackle him..
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 8:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Off topic..
Did you guys read Carr’s comments about being happy to play Sunday?..Chris Snee told him he stayed in the whole game to protect him..How awesome is that?..Snee just gave Carr alot of serious confidence which was lacking!!..It’s like going to war and telling your fellow soldier “I’m right by your side man”..Awesome!
by Bobbiblue on Oct 13, 2009 8:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Very cool stuff Bobbi.
Only on the Giants.
"With the game on the line. I want the ball in my hands."
-E
by tito (eight and oh) on Oct 14, 2009 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whine etc.
Our Giants are 5-0, the receiving corps is jim-dandy and our running game is just fine, our #1 QB just threw a perfect game and the backup scored 16 pts. As a fan I would like to see the G-men have a laugher every week. Danny Ware should be back soon to add to our running game, a little joy guys.
by 7mike on Oct 14, 2009 6:17 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Reverse logic
Guys
When we play the Eagles it is always about slowing Westbrook down so that he does not control the game. If we do that and we win the game we all applaud the effort by the defence. If Westbrook runs and catches all over us we will complain like hell!!
Well the other teams are not going to allow Jacobs to control the game by pounding out yard after yard.
So just as we stop the opp’s best players on offence they are doing the same to us.
However, when we replace Jacobs with Bradshaw it is a different offence – more speed and less power, combined with our improved passing game means that the opp has to gameplan for both a power and speed running game and a short and long passing game.
Time will tell if we have too many weapons to defend against, but the playcalling has been top notch this season so at the moment I am happy that we have a good chance to score points against whoever we face.
by G Fan in England on Oct 14, 2009 6:27 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Over at Philly.com ...
they are comparing Bradshaw to Westbrook, and they sound more afraid of him than B-Jake (but to me they are really best as a 1-2 punch).
There was an article that compared the two teams, said the offenses were a push, our defense was better, and our coaching was better (something about a ring).
by Shofner85 on Oct 14, 2009 7:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
wow
Philly.com being objective about a NY Team?
Wait, no, never mind, they’re just being typical Philly pessimists about every Philly team that’s not the current darlings of the city. It’s just strange that the Eagles aren’t the toast of the town
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
by cjmulrain on Oct 14, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Philly
may be on the verge of a very good year
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 14, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's rare to see KG
praised on this site, albeit indirectly. No one calls a perfect game. No good argument can be made that KG has failed as an OC. No one can say that a guy who ran a run and shoot and now runs a grind it out isn’t flexible.
One of the fascinating aspects of the game will be to see the match up between TC’s O and Sean’s.
I’m sure Shock will be a big part of NO’s game plan and would love to stick it to us and I’m sure his former team mates will do what they can to stop him. It promises to be a great match up, the best game of the year so far and, damn, I might miss seeing it.
by blue gonz on Oct 14, 2009 6:52 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
It is rare to see KG praised...I agree
the Giants have to play offense against the D that is presented. Gilbride has done a very good job….483 yards of offense, 44 points and 5 convincing wins (relatively easy schedule but still nice, convincing wins)!!!
I think he calls a very good game based on what is given him. Lets be honest we have had a lot of success with him at the “offensive switch”.
by celticfool on Oct 14, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's hard to criticize him so far
except the short yardage stuff, which still drives me crazy. But the other 99% of the plays he’s been great, to the point that the short yardage stuff doesn’t come up or matter as much
"[The Giants] beat us down. We were beat by a grown-man team, a team we want to be like one day. They came in here and took it to us. Out-manned us, out-gunned us. ... It wasn't even close." - Raheem Morris, 9/27/09
by cjmulrain on Oct 14, 2009 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
well
although I’m off the “behead Gilbride” bandwagon, consider that although it’s probably wrong to doubt the Giants because of their weak opponents, it may also be misleading to puff up Gilbride too much at this point b/c of the quality of opponents, tired defenses, etc..
You play to win the game!
by Simms-McConkey on Oct 14, 2009 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Run Forrest Run
It’s very clear to everyone but Brandon…watch tape of him last year and you can see he hit the line of scrimmage in full stride actually running through holes…this year he has taken a page out of the Ron Dane playbook…stutter stepping, prancing, and dancing into the line of scrimmage…keep watching Bradshaw explode through those holes and he’ll be watching the entire game from the bench where he should be. Shut up and run!
by J F on Oct 14, 2009 9:54 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How do holes form?
The O-line and blockers have to separate huge defenders apart from each other wide enough to open a lane. Does that happen instantly after the snap most of the time? No. So what do you do? You wait a little. He did that last year all the time. The game that sticks out in my head is Carolina because I was there, but he did do that despite what we love him for is picking up the first down by demolishing people for a few yards. And you just compared Brandon Jacobs to Ron Dayne… wow. Holy ****.
"Manning.... lobbs it! Burress, alone! TOUCHDOOOWN NEW YORK!"
by mahmoodzaky on Oct 16, 2009 4:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Jacobs is helping the passing game
The Raiders played a lot of man on our receivers…with one safety 15 yards off in the middle. So basically their game plan was to stop the run. The Giants receivers destroyed the man on man coverage.
I think that this man on man coverage has been consistent all year with the opposing teams. Now that Smith, Maningham, NIcks are doing so well they are going to have to start doubling up on one of them. Once they soften the run defense to watch out for our very competent pass offense, this will start to give some running room for Jacobs.
My point is that Teams were and are fearful of our run game and OVERCOMPENSATED…now they will realize they also have to watch our pass offense…Then our run offense will improve.
IT is GREAT to see such a balance offense attack. Jacobs will have his day again!
by celticfool on Oct 14, 2009 10:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















