ESPN's Mosley defends Eli
I love to pick on ESPN's Matt Mosley because of his roots as a Dallas Cowboys beat reporter. Today, though, I am a big fan.
In a mailbag posted Wednesday Mosley had the following exchange with a reader regarding Eli Manning.
Dave from Asheville, N.C., had this to say: I think the root of the Giants' problems is the thought that Eli Manning is the right guy behind center. If it were up to me, I would save the salary-cap room and let him go, but what other options are there for quarterbacks. To me, Manning has never been the center of our team, it's been the defense and the running game.
Mosley: Please tell me Dave's alone on this. I know it's disappointing to lose in the divisional round after such a great regular season. But Manning's a year removed from leading you to the Super Bowl. I just can't imagine why anyone would turn on the guy already. Yes, the defense has been a big part of the team's success. But Manning's willingness to take on more of a leadership role has been huge. And though he was dreadful against the Eagles in the playoffs, he's earned some margin for error based on his 2007 performance. I really hope Dave's a voice in the wilderness on this.
Thank you, Matt.
Dave, I hope you're not out there reading this. Dump Eli to save salary-cap room? That might be about the stupidest suggestion I've seen since I started this site two seasons ago. I seriously hope none of you out there in BBV Nation are with Dave on this one.
Sure, be upset that he didn't play well in the playoffs against the Eagles. No one is perfect. Remember, though, that's as much Kevin Gilbride's fault as it is Eli's. Manning is a 28-year-old with a Super Bowl MVP in his pocket and is coming off the best regular season of his career.
The Giants have done a lot of winning with Eli as their quarterback. They will do a lot more before his career is finished, and he very well might end up being thought of as the best quarterback in team history.
Dump him to the curb to save salary cap room? That's just silly.
0 recs |
42 comments
Comments
That silly awe shucks Eli
How many years has he been a full time starter in the league? How many times have the Giants reached the playoffs?…………..Must be the off season.
We're only gonna score 17 points?
by big blue wrecking crew on Jan 22, 2009 8:17 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
It's ridiculous
That anyone would want to replace Eli. How quickly we forget.
Giants fan from the womb to the tomb
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jan 22, 2009 8:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Are you kidding?
Go read the nonsense on the giants message board and big blue interactive. This is all a handful of morons talk about. The stupidity is embarrassing, and Dave from Asheville is not the only moron out there.
This is a great article by the way. It won’t shut up the whiners, but maybe it’ll get them to crawl back into their holes for a while.
by qb10 on Jan 22, 2009 9:10 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Nobody likes to be wrong
Many Eli detracters have invested alot of time and effort in having front row seats to what they hoped would be a disaster. The more Eli improves the more egg his haters have on thier face. Following last years SB all the Eli Haters had to eat crow in front of everyone they had offered thier negative opinions about him to. Now the haters are out for revenge on Eli for making them look stupid. Ya can’t argue with them, they ignore facts and accomplishments because such things just serve to prove them wrong.
by Mua Dib on Jan 22, 2009 11:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
To play Devil's Advocate
I’m not saying we should dump Eli, that’s ridiculous. But I don’t think we should be blindly defending him either. He’s QBed us to 4 straight playoffs, true. But two of those were at home, and his poor play in both of them pretty much ended any chance we had of winning. He also lost in the first round 2 years ago, though he didn’t play terribly in that one. His career regular season passer rating is 76.1, his career postseason passer rating is 77.6.
He’s an inconsistent QB who put together 4 spectacular games in a row (5 if you count the last regular season game last year), but has been more or less average the rest of his career. In this, his best season, he was 14th in the league in passer rating, 19th in Completion %, 17th in passing yards, 10th in TDs, and 20th in Yards per Attempt. That was all accomplished while playing behind one of the most dominant lines in the league and with an historic rushing attack.
Again, I don’t think they should drop Eli right this second, but I’d be wary about giving him a lengthy, pricey extension either. I just don’t think he’s an elite QB, and I don’t think he’s worth Peyton/Brady money, when other options could probably accomplish what Eli can accomplish. I’ll always appreciate last year’s playoff run, and I’ll always love Eli for what he did in the Super Bowl, but I just don’t know how confident I am in him repeating that performance.
by cjmulrain on Jan 22, 2009 9:27 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
CJ, you devil
Maybe he never will. That was a historically good playoff/Super Bowl run. Sure, he probably shouldn’t be the highest-paid player in the league, but I am happy to have him as our QB.
BTW, if you want to make a comparison of his numbers you have to compare him to the guys who play in similar weather conditions most of the time. Look at Ben Roethlisberger, Brett Favre and Donovan McNabb and Eli’s numbers for the season are roughly equal to or better than all of them.
by Ed Valentine on Jan 22, 2009 9:44 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good point re weather conditions, Ed.
I never though of that comparison. Factoring that in, maybe Simms deserves to be in the HOF after all? Anyway, I hope the Giants can get Simms to help Eli learn how to throw in the wind, etc. Some BBVer recently posted an articel about Simms’s continuing to study the mechanics of throwing the ball and claiming that if he knew in his playing days what he knows now he would have been immeasuerably better.
by blue gonz on Jan 22, 2009 9:49 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good Eli, Bad Eli
Interestingly. Eli’s QB rating through week 13 was a superior 91.3, which raises two issues in my mind: (1) weather; and (2) Burress’ absence. As Ed says, there will always be a statistical bias against QBs who regularly play in bad weather. That said, i believe that he can raise his game substantially if he can learn to throw a tight spiral on those windy December days. On the second point, most elite QBs over the years have had at least one elite receiver to throw to, and there’s little doubt that Plax’s absence affected Eli’s play. Once again, that’s something that can be fixed.
The story of Eli Manning is still being written and the ending is far from certain. But I’m optinistic that he’s still capable of becoming the consistent money player we want him to be.
by django48 on Jan 22, 2009 10:09 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well said, Ed, and cj, that's calling it like it is.
As a practical matter, I see Eli as a guy the team has committed to, period. I don’t believe he’ll ever become an elite QB, although I’m hoping he’ll reach the Phil Simms level at least and maintain that level.
You don’t need a Joe Montana, John Elway type to create a dynasty, something we all hope will happen for the Giants. The Steelers did it with Terry Bradshaw, a better than average QB supported by an all star cast.
I agree, cj, that Eli’s not worth the kind of money we’ve been hearing about. A performance-laden contract with those kind of numbers would be justifiable.
by blue gonz on Jan 22, 2009 9:43 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Manning is an enigma
Sometimes I don’t know what to make of Eli.
He lead the Giants to what is probably the single greatest moment in the history of their franchise…. but what if David Tyree drops that pass?
CJMulrain really nailed it with the stats— they are not “elite level” and Eli has had talent around him.
When Phil Simms lead the Giants his numbers were never great. That was a reflection of the low risk system that he played in. With Simms you knew he could take his game to another level. You knew that most of the time he was playing a deliberatly conservative brand of football. At the same time, you knew that if the situation called for it, Simms could open it up on offense and through the ball around the field and generate points.
Dave Brown did not have that ability. When the pressure was on, Dave Brown was not going to win games for us. Whatever his statistics were, you could watch Dave Brown play and know that he could not take over a game if he needed to.
The odd thing about Eli Manning is, sometimes he appears to have game dominating talent and sometimes he doesn’t. I could ignore the numbers— and the playoff losses— if I felt more confidence that Manning could really turn it on when wants to. The thing that troubled me most about that loss to Philly is how helpless Eli appeared to be. Better play calling would have made a big difference. But would Phil Simms have recognized sooner that the Eagles were tracking the Giant’s offensive play calling?
Would the Giants have been better off drafting someone else and keeping Kerri Collins or Kurt Warner all those years ago?
All that is hindsight. I want Eli Manning back. I can’t deny that sometimes I have doubts. But, if he does nothing else in his career, he has become a legend among Giants players. I hope he plays his whole career with the Giants.
Go Giants!
My dying words will be 'Go Giants!'"
by wankerboy on Jan 22, 2009 9:55 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Eli
I think Eli’s best years are still ahead of him.
And I don’t expect him to carry this team on his shoulder all alone.
That’s what they had in Denver with Elway and Miami with Marino. Although both of those guys were HOF QBs Elway didn’t win a Superbowl till they provided him a decent running game, and Marino never won one because he was basically a one man show.
by John W on Jan 22, 2009 10:03 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Manning has gotten progressively better since the beginning of their ‘07 season when Couglin finally realized he was killing a good thing with his over-the-top old school attitude. Eli’s gotten progressively better and will continue to get better barring serious injury—as will the whole team.
How was he inconsistent this year??? This was his most consistent regular season performance. You’re just pouting because we ended up facing the eagles in the playoffs as they were getting hot and our offense was searching for a plaxico-less indentity that gave Jim Johnson wet dreams. Losing a number one WR especially in the last leg of a season is no small thing. Our offense had a game plan game plan for 11 games, and then it’s gone. Bad timing. It happens. You can’t win them all, but we did win our division.
You don’t think he’s an elite QB. That’s fine, you’re entitled to your opinion. But ask yourself this. Did you believe that Manning could lead your team to the promised land? I’m guessing no, so how could you know now with any certainty that Manning will end his career as an elite QB, good QB or average QB? As an example, look at Kurt Warner. Who would have thunk it?
I would be very surprised if there isn’t another championship run in Eli before it’s all wrapped up. That performance last year was a total shock. This kid is only getting started.
by qb10 on Jan 22, 2009 10:07 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Instant Gratification
As I have thought about it more, I think part of the whole deal with Eli is we live in an instant gratification world, where everyone is judged by the very last thing they did. The very last thing Eli did this season was bad, and it colors our judgment.
The very last thing he did a year ago was win a Super Bowl, and that colored our judgment.
As was said in an earlier comment, the story of Eli is still being written. When all is said and done, I suspect it will be a very good story for Giants fans.
by Ed Valentine on Jan 22, 2009 10:18 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Instant gratification?
Our judgment colored by the last thing he did? Ed, are you saying we’re like Eagles fans?
by django48 on Jan 22, 2009 10:43 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Now I am all revved up
I avoided ranting after the Eagles loss because everyone else covered the issues pretty well.
But really, how did we not get Ahmad Bradshaw the ball a few times?
The guy took the opening kickoff seventy yards and set the Giants up for a score.. and we almost never see him again.
I love Brandon Jacobs and Ward. Those guys are key players on our offense. But really…. we lose Plaxico… who else do we have on offense that really scares an opponent? Who makes an oppponent think “if that guy breaks a tackle we are in trouble?” Ahmad Bradshaw.
Yes, we should have run the ball more. We all know that…. and Bradshaw should have gotten a few of those carries. He might have broken one for 30 or 40 yards, maybe a touchdown, and knocked some of the confidence out of the Eagles defense.
And yes… I do have a point to make about Eli Manning.
I think the Eagles figured out that when things are going badly and Eli decides its time to make a play to shake things up, he is going to go deep. I think the Eagles went into that game knowing they were going to run blitz early and then drop deep on pass coverage.
When Eli went short it was always the tight end over the middle. I don’t remember seeing our receivers break off a short route.
Hopefully the coaching and play calling are better next year.
My dying words will be 'Go Giants!'"
by wankerboy on Jan 22, 2009 10:23 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Bradshaw
I was surprised all season by the lack of playing time Bradshaw got, but I had to keep reminding myself that I am not watching these guys practice every week. Maybe Bradshaw had a fumbling problem that kept him out of the big situations. I also tried to keep in mind that with Ward and Jacobs both playing as well as they did, messing with the depth chart at RB would not be a thought.
I hope he is the #2 next year because, as you said, he is one of the few players we have that can make a couple people miss and take it to the house.
by BigBlue4Life on Jan 22, 2009 12:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Eli
is a good QB, but KG is setting him up for failure. throwing long passes to WRs who cant win the 1 on one battle and come up with the ball the way plax could. What would his passer rating have been had half of those drops in the two eagles losses been completions?
next season, with no real “go up and get it” deep threat, we need more quick dumps. Have ward catching it out of the back field, more to Boss, some short crossing routes so that if we want to let moss or any of our other guys go deeps, they are not doubled. Plax could get it in a double team, the guys we have now cant.
by ryanwk628 on Jan 22, 2009 10:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Id also like to see him grow up a little more
more, “its on me” accountability (he can now that he won a super bowl) and less having his father waiting for him outside the locker room to drive him home after a bad game
by ryanwk628 on Jan 22, 2009 10:35 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Is that what he was doing
when he took that picture with you? LMAO!!!
Giants fan from the womb to the tomb
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jan 22, 2009 10:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wankerboy-Agreed on the Playcalling
Woeful playcalling in the eagles game.
But how can they run the ball more when the Egirls were stuffing Jacobs on KEY runs like the fourth and two? Go over to NFL network and watch Anatomy of a Play: Bradley Stops Jacobs.
There’s another one called How the Giants Run Failed When It Counted Most, but I can’t find it anymore.
The eagles D knew that Jacobs sometimes does not “run patiently” as one of the other analysts described it. He had to follow tightly behind his full back. If he did, Jacobs would have gotten the yards.
Remember in the Carolina game?, they called a similar run with Derrick Ward in overtime and he broke through for a huge gain. Ward followed closely behind his O-line and Hedgecock.
This whole team is still growing. I’m sure there were some valuable lessons in that ugly loss.
by qb10 on Jan 22, 2009 10:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Well put
The playcalling was based on the Eagles defensive schemes. The Eagles wanted to put the game in Eli’s hands. They saw the entire season how the incredible Giants run made for an even better passing game, so they took the running game away to see if the passing game could survive itself. They wanted to put the game in Eli’s hands. You can complain about your playcalling, but can’t take away from the Eagles gameplan.
by witten82 on Jan 22, 2009 5:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Can't put the game in Eli's hands
That’s just it… Eli can manage the game but he can’t carry the game. Granted, we’re missing Plax and the play-calling was questionable, but Eli was completely lost out there. I agree with CJ’s assessment; right on; similar to the post I made last week re: the ridiculous rumor about that contract that he could never live up to. The problem is exactly what others here have said… “Good Eli, Bad Eli”… “Eli is an Enigma”. He’s inconsistent. His mechanics are simply under par. I am not an Eli hater. His stats are o.k, he did play solidly through last year’s play-off run, he played fine earlier this season. The problem is that he’s a solid QB but he’s not an elite QB. I believed that in the heat of the Super Bowl win when he made some pretty incredible plays and I believed after the Eagles defeat when he seemed incredibly confused and incompetent on the field. I do hope though that this inconsistency does not mark Eli’s entire career. He’s at that crucial five-year point, where hopefully the real Eli will stand up. Maybe he will grow into the position; I hope so. Maybe not…
by kbd12 on Jan 27, 2009 11:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Dave from Asheville
Need a glass belly button, so he can see what the rest of us are doing out here.
Giants fan from the womb to the tomb
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jan 22, 2009 11:01 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yes, Eli had a horrible game on Sunday but so did the whole team. It’s not right to just pin one guy for the loss. How about Gilbrides play calling? Carney’s two miss FG’s? or the defense giving up a 3rd and 20? There is no reason to get rid of Eli. The guy gives us a chance to win every week. He is coming off the best stats of his career. The Giants weren’t hot going into the playoffs. If you don’t like Manning that’s fine, but just admit it. Don’t say we should get rid of him because of his playing. That’s just stupid.
by Jamie02 on Jan 22, 2009 11:40 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
We need to get Dave from Asheville
on BBV
Giants fan from the womb to the tomb
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jan 22, 2009 11:45 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I remember...
I remember when the Giants’ quarterback controversy was Graham vs Kanell. I think I’ll stick with Eli…
by bws on Jan 22, 2009 12:15 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
A little perspective
I believe the QB rating criteria is a very poor measure of a Quarterback to begin with. First off, it is purely passing stats. I does not take into account dropped passes, QB pressures, style of offense, weather conditions, strength of schedule or any other measurable that contributes or detracts from the players value to his team.
I’ll admit that Eli’s consistency can be questioned, but not without considering the rest of incidentals from each game. Give credit to the opposing teams defenses, which the Giants played 4 of the top 5 defenses in the league this season. I don’t see too many other QB’s in the league being called out when our defense knocks them out of their comfort zone.
We definitely know that Eli will never put up Peyton’s numbers, but that is to be expected with the style of offense the Giants play, albeit his rating should be higher considering this. The number of dropped passes this year was maddening and I’ll give up the fact that maybe 20% of those were due to ball placement by Eli. The other thing we don’t know, except when it’s obvious, is how many times receivers broke off their routes or ran the wrong ones. You can’t expect to complete passes on timing routes when that happens. It was obvious that without Burress there was a distinct drop in Eli’s game. Burress ability to adjust to a ball in the air and out jump defenders is difficult, if not impossible, to replace.
All in all, the kid runs a complex offense to precision and has great recognition skills, a strong arm with a need to adjust his cold weather mechanics, throws a very catchable ball at other times of the year and improves every year while just approaching his prime. Give him a receiving corps like the Cardinals or even one top notch wide-out like Fitzgerald and I think this conversation takes on a different direction and tone. Lets not forget that he has one of the best W/L records of any current QB in the league since he started.
He ain’t perfect, maybe far from it, but he’s ours.
Bleeding Blue since 1962
by sunlion333 on Jan 22, 2009 12:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Gilbride's
play calling was another big reason for Eli’s successes and failures, so a big Bronx cheer to KG for the Philly debacle.
Bleeding Blue since 1962
by sunlion333 on Jan 22, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You guys are really bored aren't you..
We lost, get over it, they will be back next year. From the SB last year and MANY times this year, everyone loved the job Eli was doing. The offense slipping the second 1/2 of this year was not on Eli…you can thank PLAX & KB……………..
"18-1, Write that Book"
by BigBl42 on Jan 22, 2009 12:38 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Bored
ummmm, yeah. It’s the off-season and baseball does not get interesting until July.
by BigBlue4Life on Jan 22, 2009 2:55 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Patience, patience...
the barometer of success for the NYG QB position is Simms, right?
Phil was drafted in 1979 and didn’t win his first SB until 1986. So let’s give the kid a chance. He’s got the physical tools, he’s a winner, and he has the backing of the locker room.
And besides, who the F* else is out there that would be even remotely close to being able to play in the pressure-cooker NY media market? Eli is the right guy for this team right now. To say that he needs to go for salary cap reasons is preposterous.
by Cody K on Jan 22, 2009 12:55 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Simms
Gotta love the guy, but if he’s the gold standard for Giants QBs, what does that make Eli? Simms won exactly one SB during his tenure. Don’t forget that Simms sat out the entire 1990 postseason. Hostetler guided the team to its second SB win.
We Giants fans were just as disappointed after the ‘87, ’88 and ’89 seasons. But I don’t remember anyone dumping on Phil then. Why dump on Eli now?
by django48 on Jan 22, 2009 9:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
in '90
the Giants were undefeated with Simms as the starter, weren’t they? I think they were winning that Super Bowl, with or without Simms. It just might not have come down to a missed field goal.
by cjmulrain on Jan 24, 2009 11:17 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree they would have won either way.
Not so sure about it not coming down to a missed FG. I remember Bills players complaining after the fact that they just weren’t prepared for Hostetler being so good. A lot of it was his ability to run (“like a deer,” one of them said.) Would Simms have beens sacked on some of those runs? Would he have gotten rid of the ball quicker, or found open receivers? Who knows? What we do know is that after H took over a large contingent of fans (the majority as I recall) clamored for H to be the starter on a permanent basis.
by blue gonz on Jan 24, 2009 12:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I do vaguely remember that
That was the year I started watching football, and I remember being a big Hostetler fan, though I was also a big Simms fan.
by cjmulrain on Jan 24, 2009 2:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
4 years as a starter, 4 winning seasons, 4 consecutive playoff appearances, 1 Superbowl.
Eli is perhaps the most successful QB in Giants history after just 4 years as the starter. Does anyone think this team will miss the playoffs the next 2-3 years? Does anyone think this team won’t win another Superbowl?(even if they don’t, who cares?)
41-23 since 2005. Regardless of his faults the kid wins ballgames. When Eli has a losing season have at it until then enjoy it.
by Major on Jan 22, 2009 3:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Running the ball
The game is fading into nothing more than a bitter memory.
It will be a long time before I forget first and five at the Eagles 21 yard line with 1:50 to go in the first half and Gilbride called for three straight passes.
I seem to recall yelling at my TV set in the third quarter too “run the damn ball!!!”. It wasn’t until the fourth quarter that they started running the ball… and only after they were behind by two scores.
Gilbride does react but it takes him at least a quarter longer than it takes everyone else on the the planet.
The Eagles started the game run blitzing on first down. They knew the Giants would at least start the game running on early downs. Everybody wanted to know just how healthhy Brandon Jacobs was. So they stuffed a couple of runs and the Giants started throwing passes. The Eagles were waiting for that adjustment and were dropping guys back into coverage— but they had backed off of 8 guys in the box. I could see it in the second quarter. But it didn’t dawn on Gilbride until the fourth quarter.
One other thing… I am not blaming anyone, this is just how it was. But our pass rush was shot by the end of the regular season. Injuries and exhaustion had set in. Midway through that game the Eagles realized we weren’t getting to McNabb. We should have backed off on the blitz and dropped more guys into coverage. I know you are asking Steve Spagnoulo to suddenly change everything about his defense, but still, if you don’t have the guys to pull it off, change your scheme. I will live with that one. I am more frustrated by Gilbride’s lack of recognition.
Go Giants!
My dying words will be 'Go Giants!'"
by wankerboy on Jan 22, 2009 4:19 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Eli not solely to blame for loss
Eli did not have the greatest game by any means. Into the wind the ball looked like a helicopter, with the wind he overthrew everybody. That being said what was up with the play calling. The Eagles have a great run defense, I’ll admit but Baltimore’s is even better and we ran the ball all over them. Why not stick with it and see what happens. The defense played well enough that we could have ran the ball more.
Eli didn’t rank in the top 10 in most numbers but his job is not to be Peyton or Drew Brees. he’s supposed to manage the game, hit some play action passes and that’s about it. I think he did a pretty good job of that this year. We had two guys go over a 1,000 yards rushing. When that happens your QB is not going to throw for 4,000 yards and 40 TDs.
I almost hope Gilbride gets the job in Oakland. Maybe a different play caller will be good for the offense in the big games.
by Big Blue Fan in Wisconsin on Jan 22, 2009 4:48 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















