Big Blue View: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Fedor vs Rogers Results and Live Coverage

Could Gonzalez fit the Giants' needs?

The great Mike Garafolo has proposed a different solution for how the New York Giants can replace Plaxico Burress.

Get Tony Gonzalez, the future Hall of Fame tight end, from the Kansas City Chiefs.

MG speculates that the arrival of a new GM (Scott Pioli) in Kansas City, and Gonzalez' well-known desire not to play for a rebuilding team, could make this a match.

Gonzalez_tony3_medium
Tony Gonzalez

So here's a guy (Gonzalez) that wanted out a few months ago and nearly forced his way to the Giants. Now, add in a change of GM with a looming coaching change and suddenly you've got a guy that really wants out and could cause a stink if he doesn't get his way. Would Pioli want this kind of a headache right out of the gate? Or would he, having come from the ultimate team system in New England, want to come in and establish that no player is above the whole? I'm guessing the latter. ...

Now, we know the Giants showed at least mild interest in Gonzalez at the trading deadline. And that was before they lost Plaxico Burress. GM Jerry Reese has talked about what a presence Burress was on the field, though to be fair he did indicate he thinks can get by without one. Still, this passing game needs help. Burress could provide that help by returning to the fold with a new, improved mindset. But the Giants won't know if he's available to return until after his court date on March 31 - a full month and a day after the start of the free agency and trading period. That means they'd have to proceed with adding a receiver without knowing for sure if Burress will be behind bars. ...

I know what everybody's saying about Anquan Boldin and T.J. Houshmandzadeh, but does anybody really think Arizona is going to trade Boldin? And Houshmandzadeh, if he comes free, would be a fine addition to any team. But he's not a Burress-type presence. And adding a receiver in the draft means you're looking for a guy to develop into a stud receiver in a few years, not immediately. So what's the best way to create a big impact on your passing game?

Add one of the best receiving tight ends in league history. ...

Also, I know Gonzalez will be 33 next month, but he had 96 catches for 1,058 yards and 10 TDs this year. Oh, and after the trading deadline when he ripped the team for not trading him, he had 75 receptions for 865 yards and 8 TDs in 11 games. That's an average of almost seven catches for 88 yards per game. Imagine what he'll provide when he's doing what he wants to do - play for a winner.

Personally, I love this idea. The Giants are a team built to win now, and Gonzalez obviously still has plenty left in the tank to be a major force for another year or two. A two tight-end set with Kevin Boss would cause nightmares for defensive coordinators. It would also be a huge help to the Giants in what Tom Coughlin calls the 'Green Zone.' Plus, this would likely cost the Giants a lot less in terms of draft picks than a trade for either Boldin or Calvin Johnson -- if those are even possible.

Gonzalez stats from the just-completed season are below. His career numbers can be found here.

Your thoughts?


Receiving Kickoff Returns Punt Returns
G Rec Yds Y/G AVG Lng TD KR YDS AVG Lng TD PR Yds Avg Lng TD
16 96 1058 66.1 11.0 35 10 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 

0 recs  |  Comment 56 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Pretty Good Idea

I guess because KC sucked so bad I did not realize what Gonzalez’s stats were, but thats pretty good for a bad team and with Tyler Thigpin as your QB. If you think about it, its a very good move because you don’t have to give up much because of his age. You can draft a Kenny Britt (RU guy) late in the first round or second round. And give them a year or two to develop. Sign a cheaper FA WR like Shaun McDonald from the Lions to add a possion WR. TG is good in the Red Zone an obvious area of weakness and he can’t be covered by Saftey’s alone so it could open up Smith, Hixon & Boss in 2 TE formations. We’ll see but I like it. Very Giant Like

by Landeta on Jan 15, 2009 7:11 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

One problem

KG does not like to utalize the TE in his offense. Figures

by Landeta on Jan 15, 2009 7:58 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Well

As MG said in another part of his article, make him figure it out.

by Ed Valentine on Jan 15, 2009 8:01 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I Like it

It would be great to have a big threat at tight end in short yardage/redzone situations. It could also free up Steve Smith to work in space like he did before Plax did himself in. Also, I can only drool at the thought of a line-up with Gonzalez and Burress if he comes back.

by BigBlue4Life on Jan 15, 2009 7:59 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Count me in on this bandwagon

TG has the size and he solves a lot of problems in the Green Zone. Garafalo is saying exactly what I’ve been saying … the options we’ve been discussing are both (maybe) unrealistic (Boldin) and don’t solve our need of presence in the offense now (TJ & draftee). This solves both of those issues and it pulls the secondary help out of run D, since without Plax defenses could load up in the box. And Landeta is right, draft a big WR and let him develop because TG might only have a couple of good years in him. Hell, this probably will help Boss develop into that guy. It doesn’t hurt to test the waters for Boldin, but this is an easy match & you don’t have to give up the world for him.

by potroast on Jan 15, 2009 8:28 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I rejected the idea the other day,

feeling that acquiring TG would hinder Boss’s development, but MG’s rationale has pushed me to support it. In fact, I’m enthusiastic about the idea. WOD, KG would have to exhibit enough flexibility to come up with game plans with plays to utilize two big TEs with soft hands. Blocking doesn’t concern me. Both guys are better than adequate blockers.

by blue gonz on Jan 15, 2009 8:52 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Burress & Gonzalez

Oh yea that is pretty good. I know some Giant fans are down on Hixon but I really believe if he’s paired up with a legitiment #1 he could be a very good #2 deep threat. Remember this was his first year starting as a WR in his carreer and he is very young. He came in a tough spot and showed he can make a play or two. Not a dominating force by any means and he needs some support on the other end but if anther team is forced to put their 2nd or 3rd corner on him one on one he can hit a home run.

by Landeta on Jan 15, 2009 8:53 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

You're right about Hix.

He’s going to be a valued Jint for years.

by blue gonz on Jan 15, 2009 10:13 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Hixon

I agree that Hixon can be a great deep threat. I always viewed a #2 as more of a possession receiver and the #1 as a deep threat and the guy that could draw a double team. I see Hixon as more a #3, Smith as a #2 and looking to grab a solid #1.

by losangelesmets on Jan 15, 2009 12:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I don't know if it matters

wether the #1 WR is the deep threat or possesion guy. Look at the 90’s Cowboys, Irving was actually a better possesion WR than deep threat, Alvin Harper was their long ball guy. Then TB signed Harper as a FA to be a #1 and he stunk. I think Hixon is like that. A #1 WR can be an absolute Freak like Fitzgerald who can just about anything or a big physical possesion guy like Irvin was. As long as you have a a guy that can generate double teams because of size(Plax) Speed(Steve Smith Carolina), atheletsim (Fitzgerald) or all of the above (Randy Moss) you have a #1.

by Landeta on Jan 15, 2009 2:47 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Lots of examples ...

That suggest my theory and thoughts are wrong, but if a guy does not have that long ball potential and is more of a possession guy, I just dont think that draws a lot of DBs double teams. It might move a LB over to help out.

Anyway, I think we agree that all that matters is we get someone that scares people into double-teaming them. Hixon is not that guy but maybe he can become him, not sure. Smith doesn’t look like that guy. Boss is not that guy (Tony G is with KC by default and talent). Manningham i have no idea. Moss seems ok but no idea.

by losangelesmets on Jan 15, 2009 6:50 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I love love love

this idea. I was a big-time supporter of the move back around the trade deadline, and nothing has changed my stance. Gonzalez is a play-maker, and I bet he’s still got 2 solid years left in him, which is all we really need right now. He’d be the perfect insurance policy for Plax – he can be Eli’s safety blanket if Plax doesn’t come back to the Giants next year, or if Plax does come back, we have two huge weapons in the pass game. Do it yesterday, Jerry!

by cjmulrain on Jan 15, 2009 9:08 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Good point on the two TE set

Gilfuck like to spread the field, 2 TEs with a few wideouts or bradshaw coming out of the backfield to receive would really give defenses a lot of places to be.
I’m really pissed off today, and all I can think about is that there’s no GD excuse why the Giants did not run for 250 yards on Sunday and have 40 minutes of possession.

You play to win the game!

by Simms-McConkey on Jan 15, 2009 9:11 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

2 TEs

A 2 TE formation with Gonzalez and Boss would be great because the Giants could run or pass effectively without tipping off the defense.

As for the Gilbride situation, if he doesn’t like the TE, he could just split Gonzalez off the line like a WR on passing downs. The Colts do this very effectively with Dallas Clark.

by apy5000 on Jan 15, 2009 9:35 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

2 TEs

who are excellent receivers, with one or both occasionally split wide, creates all kinds of matchup problems for defenses. This is a great idea.

by Ed Valentine on Jan 15, 2009 9:53 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

How much will the Giants have to give up?

One thing I hate about the Yankees is they’re always throwing large chunks money at players who’s best days are behind them, and then they go to the Yanks and just stink up the place. In baseball you can get away with that, especially if you’re the Yanks.

But in football, where we have a salary cap, and one injury could sideline a player for the whole season, I don’t know if Tony Gonzalez, is worth it.

I guess I’d have to trust Jerry Reese. He’s been near perfect so far in his decision making.

by John W on Jan 15, 2009 10:07 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

In retrospect

JR made a blunder by not doing the first TG deal. Of course he had no way of knowing that Cheddar Plax would shoot himself in the leg. But TG would have helped a lot.

by DoctorK16 on Jan 15, 2009 10:13 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

He couldn't have offered more

It was the dearly departed Carl Peterson who spiked that deal.

by drunkUncle on Jan 15, 2009 10:25 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm in on this!

It also has the added feature of giving Eli another great target for SHORTER passes, hello.

Save the neck for me, Clark.

by Mr. Met on Jan 15, 2009 10:35 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

I'll play Devil's Advocate

in saying I’m not thrilled with this idea. Sure, Gonzales put up pretty decent numbers this season. He was also one of the only reliable veteran targets on an offense that struggled with consistency. I also don’t believe putting another sure-handed TE on the field will solve the challenges this offense suffered, which in my mind was stretching the defense and getting the safeties out of the box and forcing the DBs further off the LOS. In fact, regularly pulling a WR off the field to put in another TE might only compound the problem.

by rzor on Jan 15, 2009 10:57 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Disagree

One of the main issues w/o Plax was lack of a real ‘Green Zone’ target. TG is a physical go-to guy who gives you that. He also gives you another guy in the middle of the field you have to respect, and one who could guarantee single coverage for Hixon and Smith.

by Ed Valentine on Jan 15, 2009 11:21 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Your right about streching the defense but

a great recieving TE creates problems with the amount of LB’s or DB’s that are on the field which in turns help the running game. Most teams will put an LB on a TE but if the TE is half Decent they use a saftety and if the TE is TG they might have to play a corner who is typically fast enough but not big enough to play with a TG type of TE. Boss ripped up Bradely on Sunday and if the G-Men used passes like that more it might of forced the Eagles to use Dawkins or Mickel to back off the run and play with Boss and that could of opened up the ground game. Shockey actually gave the Giants an advantage in this regard as did Bavaro. Great TE’s are usually the Best althletes on a Football field, they offer some sort of missmatch vs either a LB, Saftey, or Corner. Think about it Gonzalez was a great college Basketball player and Antonio Gates only played Basketball in college.

by Landeta on Jan 15, 2009 3:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah,

and Boss played roundball as well. Those guys always have good hands when they play football.

by blue gonz on Jan 15, 2009 6:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Why Not Braylon Edwards?

The parallels between BE and Plax are interesting:

Both were young guys labeled as “head cases” and each had their share of high-profile mistakes. Both had spoken openly to the press about their situations in the City they were playing and both had worn out their welcome. Both were (ARE!) maddening talents frequently plagued by a lack of concentration.

This would be a good example of low risk, high reward. I think that Braylon is the kind of guy that just needs a solid core around him. Clearly he’s talented…and he’s a prototypical #1 WR.

by Cody K on Jan 15, 2009 11:28 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Yes, but....

He had a really bad year – and a definite case of the dropsies…. But the prior year he was definitely one of the better WR’s in the league.

I don’t know, seems like a worthwhile gamble to me?

by Cody K on Jan 15, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Braylon Edwards

Unfortunately Braylon has a problem catching the ball.

by John W on Jan 15, 2009 2:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree that he struggled last season

But look at football reference.com; BE actually posted BETTER #‘s than Plax did while Plaxico was with the Steelers. I.e., there’s a good shot that the Giants could get a #1 on the cheap because his value is now so low because of the struggles he had last year. When plax was w/ the steelers, he averaged 3.5 receptions per game (BE thus far: 3.85) for 57 yds/game (BE averages 60) with an average of 4.4 TD’s/season (BE has averaged 7 TD’s/season).

Re. his drops, BE had something like 16 drops (Dwayne Bowe, KC’s #1 had 13, Brandon Marshall, Denver’s #1, had 12, TO had 10) so he had WAY more than anyone else.

But I would attribute that to the struggles that his offense had. I mean look at when their offense performed well, for example he absolutely TORCHED the Gmen in that game, something like 5 receptions for 150+ yds, and a TD.

When he is engaged and ON he is a force (pro bowler in 2007 when he averaged 5 catches a game for 80 yds w/ 16 TD’s!!). This guy has the ability to be a stud and I will bet that Cleveland would let him go for very little as he seems to have worn out his welcome there.

by Cody K on Jan 15, 2009 2:46 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Plax didnt have the best QBs while he was in pittsburgh

he only had one year with Ben, and they pass less than we do and he was the no 2 guy there behind Ward

Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.

by bren on Jan 15, 2009 5:06 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Might have to give up too much

to get him. He’s still very young and Clevland won’t just let him go for a 4th round pick which is what the Raiders got for Randy Moss. No wonder they suck. How in the hell did that deal happen, they also got Wes Welker too that year as a FA.

by Landeta on Jan 15, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Well you never know

It’s all a question of Mangini, right? If Mangini doesn’t want him or feels like the team is better off without him (and that will be obvious in the coming months) than maybe there’s chance to acquire him for the 5th rd pick from the Saints in the Shockey trade? Not really sure, but if the Browns decide that they’re fed up with him, that’s a good chance that he could shake loose.

by Cody K on Jan 15, 2009 3:01 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

If all you have to do is give up a 5th round pick

DO IT! Though you know Mangini will be a pain in the ass about it, thats just his nature

by Landeta on Jan 15, 2009 3:07 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Check this out....

Back during the season, when the Gonzalez rumors were flying, I did this story

http://www.bigblueview.com/2008/10/11/633186/giants-pursuing-tony-gonza

Doctor K made this statement in that thread:

and he gives you plax blow up insurance

We had no idea how right he was at the time

Giants fan from the womb to the tomb

by Jim Schmiedeberg on Jan 15, 2009 12:53 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Thats freaky

Doctor K was right on the money. Though Plax Shot up ont Blew up.

by Landeta on Jan 15, 2009 3:13 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Other TE

From scout.com

Tight Ends Who Should Get Starter Consideration

Owen Daniels/Houston Texans/RFA – He’s having a breakout season and the former fourth-round pick out of the 2006 draft should get at least a first-round tender from Houston.

Bo Scaife/Tennessee Titans/UFA – Tennessee has a run based offense, but when they throw it, there’s a good chance it’s going Scaife’s way. He’s having a breakout season and should receive significant interest in free agency. He probably fits best in a West Coast offense because of his athleticism and movement skills.

L.J. Smith/Philadelphia Eagles/UFA – The former second-round pick out of the 2003 draft has been somewhat of a disappointment. However, because of the lack of available veteran talent, Smith could still receive a decent of interest in free agency.

As far as WRs, and Im not up to date enough to know who got extensions but T.J. Houshmandzadeh is a great WR. He consistently out plays Ocho Cinco.

Arent Roy Williams and Lee Evans on the market or did they get extensions? I think roy may have as part of the trade but he didnt seem to happy in bigD.

One other guy we want to look at if AZ doesnt keep him is Karlos Dansby. Hes a beast of a LB

by ryanwk628 on Jan 15, 2009 1:05 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Roy W

Got a fat 6-yr extension, I think. He’s locked up.

No clue on Lee Evans though.

by Cody K on Jan 15, 2009 1:51 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Dream of all dreams...

Trade for Tony, sign Housh.

by squid92 on Jan 15, 2009 1:21 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

No thanks

The reasons in that article lead me to believe that some sort of piece should be brokered b/t Plax and Coughlin, b/c there is no one else available to fill his spot; a trade being an unsure thing, and available free agents lacking Burress physical presence.

Trading anything for a 33 year old TE is suspect, i dont see how this would aid Boss’ development either, w/o Gonzalez, I would not be surprised to see Boss playing in Miami next year the week before the superbowl-remember the NFLs newest attempt to get the Pro Bowl legitimacy…what a crock.

Anyway, our best option is Burress b/c he wont cost us any draft picks or extra cash and wont hinder the development of a future pro bowl TE in Boss, Furthermore Darcy Johnson looks like he can be a more than suitable second TE; look at what Shiancoe did in Minnesota this year, Johnson seems to have the same ability and is bigger.

I was in favor of this during the year, but Boss is proving himself to be a stud in the making and another diamond in the rough find by Reese

So short of trading for CJ or Boldin, bring back Plax (if he’s not imprisoned) Gonzalez still wouldnt address our lack of a WR, Boss is enough of a Red Zone target.

Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.

by bren on Jan 15, 2009 3:18 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

We could easily trade a 3rd rounder for him.

KC just wanted a 4th rounder over the season. And I’d be willing to trade more for his kind of production.

by squid92 on Jan 15, 2009 4:04 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I suppose

But I dont think he address our problem, which is at WR

Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.

by bren on Jan 15, 2009 4:18 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

But we're still trying to get a WR.

In the draft, or signing someone as well.

by squid92 on Jan 15, 2009 4:37 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I just dont see another TE as a priority

or even a need for that matter, not to mention his salary when we have a great TE at a much lower cost….then add that to the fact that if Boss and Gonazlez are your top 2 TEs, your running game will suffer as neither is exactly Howard Cross out there

Okay, just so I understand it... in your wildest fantasy, you are in hell. And you are co-running a bed and breakfast with the devil.

by bren on Jan 15, 2009 4:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We need at least two linebackers

before we worry about trading for more receivers.

by giant fan since 57 on Jan 15, 2009 5:11 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Disagree.

We need at least one linebacker for sure, but you can’t tell me that a #1 reciever wouldn’t immensely help this offense?

by squid92 on Jan 15, 2009 5:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

We also need..

A QB that can throw in the wind and an offensive coordinator that utilizes our team strengths on offense.

by John W on Jan 15, 2009 5:54 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

QB we're at least solid.

Definitely agree on OC, though.

by squid92 on Jan 15, 2009 7:03 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

I hate to say it but

I don’t think we have a linebacker that could play 1st string on any of the teams that made the playoffs. Aren’t you sick of watching those highlights of Pierce loping five yards behind our oppnent’s tight ends or being dragged for flive yards by running backs?

Of course a great receiver would help the offense. But the team’s greatest need now is at linebacker. Our secondary is getting beat up and we are wasting the best defensive line in football because the linebacking play has been so pitiful.

by giant fan since 57 on Jan 16, 2009 5:32 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

It's a close call, 57,

but I think you’re right on this one by a hair. (Or call it need #s 1A and 1B as cj recently did.) In any case, I see JR going the FA route for a # 1 wr and at least one LB. Kehl looks like a comer. Wilkinson seems fragile. DeOssie
never gets a chance to play, so who really knows about him? He seems slow. Clark is a journeyman. I can’t see AP playing another year, etc., etc. Smith, Hix, Mario and Toomer(??) give us depth at WR in back of a #1. Time to package Moss for a trade?

by blue gonz on Jan 16, 2009 1:31 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Actually

in the games I have watched (remember, I don’t have satellite) Clark played very well. I also like Wilkinson. He has a great nose for the ball and some speed. Good at breaking up a play too. But so far he has not been too durable.

Everyone will be on me for saying this but if I were Reese I would find a way to honorably dispose of Toomer. I can’t see getting rid of Moss before him. I know, I know, Toomer has made some fantastic clutch catches, but there comes a time for every wide out to ride off into the suset before they embarrass themselves like Chris Carter did at the end. I’m going out on a limb and saying that Moss right now has more upside than Toomer.

Moss has more speed than anyone we have. the right offensive coach should be able to take advantage of that. Steve Smith is definitely a keeper, as is Hixon, though there is no reason he shouldn’t be returning kickoffs. We’ve yet to see what Manningham can do and we also have a couple of young guys to test.

Yeah, we don’t have Plaxico but looking at it realistically, based on the greatest need, we’ve got to fix this linebacker situation before it kills us.

by giant fan since 57 on Jan 16, 2009 1:57 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Clark played well, all right.

I just don’t think he has more than a year or two left. As for Wilkinson, what you say is true, but i think his record shows he’s too fragile to be a dependable starter.
Moss? Hmm. He has had his chances, no? Time for Toom to go? Could be. I’m not about to argue with you re the LB situation.
In my eyes LB and a # 1 WR are both critical. I can see why so many think WR is more so, given that the O has been playing worse than the D, despite the weakness at the LB spot. I give credit for this to Spags.
You know, I feel like some thing of an A-hole complaining about the weaknesses of a 12-5 team. Spoiled by success, perhaps? Nevertheless, the needs are there, and, yes they have to be addressed lest next yeat at this time we’re all bemoaning a less successfull season.

by blue gonz on Jan 16, 2009 5:33 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

You're right George

The Giants can still be proud of this season. But the quest for perfection must go on. The one thing missing from the Giant’s legacy is the dynasty tag associated with dominating a decade with multiple Super Bowl wins which the 49’s, Steelers, Patriots, and (ugh!) the Cowboys enjoy.

How about Gruden getting the axe!

by giant fan since 57 on Jan 16, 2009 8:53 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

There were rumors about Gruden.

Another possibility for Spags? I get the feeling he wants to at least stay on the East coast.
Remember when the Giants wanted Bill Walsh (before he went to ’49ers) but he wanted to stay on the West coast?

by blue gonz on Jan 16, 2009 9:10 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wow, I didn't know that about Walsh...

Or, who knows, maybe I forgot it like a lot of things these days I can’t seem to remember….ha ha. Interesting to speculate about how that might have turned out.

Not trying to intrude on your personal life, but didn’t I read that your new name on the board is the result of a move to the midwest? Recently Ed suggested that we all get together for a weekend at training camp next year. I think that would be a great idea. If we got to meet in person I think it would enhance our daily experiences of communicating on the board.

by giant fan since 57 on Jan 17, 2009 5:40 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Yep, I'm in central IL, -20 degrees

last night. Caterpillar country. Six grand kids.
The Giants also tried to get TC when he coached BC, but he turned down the offer, saying he had made a committment to the BC program. Later, he went to Jacksonville. I think he had complete control there as HC and GM.
There’s a slight chance I could make it to Albany, depending on the time. I’m going to a wedding in Mexico (north of Syracuse) this summer. Snow up to the eaves there

by blue gonz on Jan 17, 2009 6:40 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Wow! -20....

   I sure don’t miss that. It’s funny, I spent a lot of years in New England and never thought twice about escaping the cold. Freezing our butts off every year just seemed normal. Even when I moved south it wasn’t to escape the climate but once I got here it was great. Did you know that there are less than 65 sunny days each year in New England? Nowadays when I go back I feel like a visiter from another country and I can’t believe I tolerated that kind of weather for so long.

   The only thing I miss about the weather in Mass is the cool summer weather, and the great smallmouth bass fishing in crystal clear lakes like Quabbin reservoir and Lake Winnipesaukee.

by giant fan since 57 on Jan 17, 2009 7:10 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Big Blue View is the best independent site on the Internet for year-round news and discussion about the New York Giants.

Community Guidelines
Start posting about the Giants »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ivan_small
BBV Week 9 pool
Chargershorse_small
BFTB Answers Your Chargers Questions

Recent FanPosts

_1avatar_small
The Recipe
Micah_small
Things Have To Change Right?
Small
I've tried to remain optimistic
Ivan_small
BBV Week 8 prelim. results
Dbc92c5112a9b23c_small
Giants get picked as the Stone Cold Lock of the Century....of the Week
Sp_strahan_small
Bradshaw has broken bone in foot
Gwvcin_small
George Wrighster's Week 7 Review and Week 8 Preview
_1avatar_small
3 and out

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Latest NFL Headlines from SB Nation

Stampede Blue
Dear Bill Polian: Please sign Jack Williams ASAP
Arrowhead Pride
Chiefs RB Kolby Smith Travels with the Team to Jacksonville
Mile High Report
Pittsburgh Steelers at Denver Broncos Saturday Injury Report

SPONSORS

Get Your Giants' Gear


Editor-In-Chief

Bigblueview_small Ed Valentine

Editors

Blueshirt_banter_small Jim Schmiedeberg

Authors

Tyree_believe_small cjmulrain

Moderators

Small brisulph