Mannings Among Men
Never let it be said that BBV doesn't aim to please. Earlier in the week 'mahmoodzakay' had asked if we could do a comparison between Eli and Peyton Manning as to where they were after 4 years in the NFL. After much discussion, we've decided to go one better and include stats for their Dad, Archie, as well. We've prepared a statistical breakdown for each one, as well as some season by season notes.
We'll start with Archie Manning. Archie was drafted Number 2 overall by the New Orleans Saints in 1971 out of Ole Miss.
|
Year |
Age |
Tm |
G |
GS |
Cmp |
Att |
Cmp% |
Yds |
TD |
Int |
Lng |
Y/G |
Rate |
Sk |
|
22 |
12 |
10 |
86 |
177 |
48.6 |
1164 |
6 |
9 |
63 |
97 |
60.1 |
40 |
||
|
23 |
14 |
14 |
230 |
448 |
51.3 |
2781 |
18 |
21 |
66 |
199 |
64.6 |
43 |
||
|
24 |
13 |
13 |
140 |
267 |
52.4 |
1642 |
10 |
12 |
65 |
126 |
65.2 |
28 |
||
|
25 |
11 |
11 |
134 |
261 |
51.3 |
1429 |
6 |
16 |
79 |
130 |
49.8 |
26 |
||
|
TOT |
7016 |
40 |
Archie was the starting QB from day one, and led the Saints to a 4-8-2 record, which was an improvement from the 2-11-1 record the Saints posted in 1970.
1972 saw the Saints fall back to 2-11-1, done in by a defense giving up almost 26 points a game. Archie led the league in passing completions and attempts, undoubtedly because the Saints were always playing from behind and forced to throw the ball more. Archie's best game of the season in 1972 came against Philadelphia, he threw for 295 yards and 2 TD's in a 21-3 drubbing of the Eagles. Of special interest to Giants fans, Giants beat the Saints in 1972, 45-21, picking off Archie 4 times.
1973 saw the Saints rebound a bit to 5-9, but statistically speaking this was a bad year for Archie, only one multi-TD game, and only 2 games with more than 200 yards passing.
The Saints finished 5-9 again in 1974, Archie had another terrible year, throwing for only 1400 yards and 6 TD's. Archie was plagued throughout his first 4 years by a lack of offensive weapons, a bad offensive line (Archie was sacked more than any other QB in 1971 and 1972, and terrible defense (near last in the league in points allowed every year.
Now we turn to America's Pitchman, Peyton Manning. Peyton was drafted number one overall by the Indianapolis Colts in 1998 out of Tennesee.
|
Year |
Age |
Tm |
G |
GS |
Cmp |
Att |
Cmp% |
Yds |
TD |
Int |
Lng |
Y/G |
Rate |
Sk |
|
22 |
16 |
326 |
575 |
56.7 |
3739 |
26 |
28 |
78 |
234 |
71.2 |
22 |
|||
|
23 |
16 |
331 |
533 |
62.1 |
4135 |
26 |
15 |
80 |
258 |
90.7 |
14 |
|||
|
24 |
16 |
357 |
571 |
62.5 |
4413 |
33 |
15 |
78 |
276 |
94.7 |
20 |
|||
|
25 |
16 |
343 |
547 |
62.7 |
4131 |
26 |
23 |
86 |
258 |
84.1 |
29 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16418 |
111 |
|
|
|
|
85 |
Like his Dad, Peyton was the starting QB from day one. Like his Dad, his early seasons were plagued by bad defense. But unlike his Dad, Peyton had weapons on offense, like Marshall Faulk at RB, Jerome Pathon and Marvin Harrison at WR, and Kent Dilger at TE. As Peyton's first season went on, the Colts became more consistent on offense, but couldn't overcome a defense giving up on average 4 TD's a game, and finished 3-13.
1999 the Colts turned it around, going 13-3 and winning the AFC East, but lost in the first round of the playoffs to Tennessee. Peyton was only sacked 14 times in 1999, and went made his first Pro Bowl.
2000 saw the Colts go 10-6 and make the playoffs as a wild card, losing to Miami. Peyton made his 2nd Pro Bowl in 2000 while leading the league in passing yards, TD's, and completions. Peyton had his best day of his young career against Jacksonville, throwing for 440 yards and 4 TD's in a 43-14 rout of the Jags.
2001 was a down year for the Colts, they went 6-10, thanks to a defense that was giving up over 30 points a game. Head coach Jim Mora was fired and replaced by Tony Dungy. Peyton had another 400 yard game against Buffalo, throwing for 421 yards and 2 TD's in a 42-26 win over the Bills. 2001 didn't bring any notable milestones for Peyton, and other than his rookie year, this is the only year Peyton has missed the Pro Bowl.
Last but not least, Number 10 in your programs, Number 1 in your hearts, Eli Manning. Eli was drafted Number One overall by San Diego, and traded to the Giants for Philip Rivers plus draft picks.
|
Year |
Age |
Tm |
G |
GS |
Cmp |
Att |
Cmp% |
Yds |
TD |
Int |
Lng |
Y/G |
Rate |
Sk |
|
23 |
7 |
95 |
197 |
48.2 |
1043 |
6 |
9 |
52 |
116 |
55.4 |
13 |
|||
|
24 |
16 |
294 |
557 |
52.8 |
3762 |
24 |
17 |
78 |
235 |
75.9 |
28 |
|||
|
25 |
16 |
301 |
522 |
57.7 |
3244 |
24 |
18 |
55 |
203 |
77 |
25 |
|||
|
26 |
16 |
297 |
529 |
56.1 |
3336 |
23 |
20 |
60 |
209 |
73.9 |
27 |
|||
|
11385 |
77 |
93 |
Eli was named the starting QB by coach Tom Coughlin in Week 11 of 2004, but you may remember Eli played in Game One against Philadelphia, after Kurt Warner was shaken up. The lowlight of Eli's rookie year was a game against Baltimore when he completed only 4 passes, threw 2 interceptions, and actually finished the day with a 0.0 QB rating. He rebounded after this game, and in the last game of the season he threw 3 TD passes against Dallas.
2005 was Eli's first full season as a starter, and he started strong, throwing 9 TD's and only 2 picks the first 4 weeks of the season, but was plagued by inconsistency after the bye week, throwing 15 TD's and 15 picks the remaining 12 games. Eli had an awful day against the Vikings, throwing 4 picks. The Giants won the division, going 11-5, but were trounced at home by the Panthers, 23-0, a game in which Eli threw 3 INT's and was sacked 4 times.
Expectations were high going into 2006, and the Giants and Eli didn't disappoint, going 6-1 after a much hyped opening night game against Peyton and the Colts, a game in which Eli outplayed his brother despite losing. The Giants and Eli were doomed by a 2nd half collapse that saw them get into the playoffs as a wild card, only to lose to Philadelphia 23-20. Eli had an up and down year, a few bright spots doomed by stretches of inaccuracy and poor decision making. The second half collapse and slow development of Eli had many calling for Coughlin's head. After meeting with management after the season, Coughlin was given one more year to straighten the team and the QB out. Kevin Gilbride was named Offensive Coordinator, and Chris Palmer was brought in to work with Eli.
I think it's fair to say 2007 was a make or break year for Eli. The fans and media were turning on him, the head coach was on the hot seat, and maybe the best offensive player the Giants have ever had retired. Eli started well, throwing 4 TD's in the opening night loss to Dallas, but after that it was the same old thing; inconsistency, bad decisions, and bad body language. The Giants beat Buffalo to go to 10-5 and clinch a playoff spot, but many were wondering if Eli was ever going to be the QB the Giants thought he would.
That all started to change on December 29th when the 15-0 Patriots came to Giants Stadium. Eli outplayed Tom Brady that night, throwing 4 TD passes. Little did anyone know then that a little more than a month later, Eli would outplay the best QB in football again.
Eli played well in all 4 playoff games, and didn't throw a pick until the Super Bowl. His numbers in the SB were good enough to earn him the Super Bowl 42 MVP award and a trip to Disneyland.
In doing the research for this story, I came to a few conclusions:
- The Mannings are extremely durable. Archie missed 6 games in 4 seasons,which isn't bad if you consider he was sacked 137 times in those 4 seasons, an average of almost 3 times per game. Neither Peyton nor Eli have missed a game since becoming starters, an amazing feat in today's NFL.
- When you look in terms of statistics,all three Mannings battled inconsistency, interception totals are high for all three of them, although ever since the start of Peyton's 6th season, his INT totals have come way down. Maybe this is a sign of things to come for Eli.
- There is much debate on just how good Archie was. He never made the playoffs, and played on some of the worst teams in modern day NFL history, so there is some school of thought that his stats are somewhat "padded" because he played on losing teams that had to throw the ball a lot. My theory is that Peyton and Eli didn't get their genes by accident, and Archie was a pretty good QB playing on pretty lousy teams.
- While numbers wise you have to give the edge to Peyton, in the NFL, "the rings the thing" so you have to give the edge to Eli there for getting his team a Super Bowl victory in his 4th year. While Archie certainly didn't have many achievements on the field, there isn't another man alive who can say he raised two Super Bowl MVPs.
Special thanks to Pro Football Reference.com , and NFL.com for their help with the research, and also Mrs. jrs1940 who knows a little more about formatting than I do, and saved my butt on this.
1 recs |
16
comments
Read Related
Comments
Great job, jr
I’ve always felt Archie was underrated
by george cronin on May 31, 2008 10:14 AM EDT 0 recs
Nice analysis
Some things jump put at me when I look at the numbers. Eli & Peyton have very similar stats except for completions, comp , x%x yards. These all can be attributed to Peyton being more accurate, which isn’t much of a surprise to any of us. More importantly to me is TDs & INTs are very similar (INTs Jr pointed out). With the weapons Eli has TDs are only going to keep improving & hopefully approach that 33 TD year from Peyton. If Eli cuts down on INTs, then I’ll be very happy. He can’t continue to have almost 1:1 of TD:INT and hope to continue the team success against teams hungry to dethrone the champs.
by potroast on May 31, 2008 1:48 PM EDT 0 recs
Interesting read on the Mannings.
As a Bronco fan, I can’t stand Peyton Manning, but I always thought Eli was alright…especially since he snubbed the Chargers way back when. Love it when a divisional rival gets insulted!
If God is not a Bronco fan, then WHY are sunsets Blue and Orange? - Jon Tollerud 5/22/08
The Quest ~ TSG 5/19/08
by Zappa on May 31, 2008 2:09 PM EDT 0 recs
Everything about this analysis is spot on
Expect this:
Expectations were high going into 2006, and the Giants and Eli didn’t disappoint, going 6-1 after a much hyped opening night game against Peyton and the Colts, a game in which Eli outplayed his brother despite losing.That’s just blatantly false. Anyone who watched that game saw Peyton dominate the NY Giatns defense from start to finish. Despite little production from the running game, and a Colts defense that was gashed by Tiki Barber and Brandon Lloyd, Peyton carved up NY’s secondary and stood tall despite their pass rush.
Meanwhile, Eli played very well, but threw a costly third quarter INT (a played that followed a dumb penalty by Tim Carter).
Everything else in this analysis is excellent. But to say Eli played better than Peyton in that first regular season game in 2006 is just not correct. And before people start pulling out Peyton’s and Eli’s stats for the game, I’ll remind you that even Bob Papa and the Giants play-by-play guys agreed Peyton played better. The Colts offense was 11-16 on third down that night. Eli also had two very costly turnovers (fumble and INT) while Peyton had just one. Here’s what ESPN had to say about the game:
The Colts were able to win thanks to Peyton Manning’s ability to keep the mistakes and turnovers to a minimum. The Colts still need to find some kind of a running game, but Peyton was able to dissect the Giants when it was needed. The Giants, with Eli Manning at the helm, were able to move the ball, especially on the ground, but couldn’t put the ball in the end zone, especially when it counted. That, and inopportune penalties, really cost the Giants a chance to win this game.BTW: The Giants are my back-up team. I root for them when the Colts aren’t playing. Love Eli Manning. Defended him for years. Shockey is garbage and needs to get jettisoned.
Colts v. Giants Super Bowl this year!
SB Nation's Indianapolis Colts blogger at Stampede Blue. Please make an account and post a diary, add some comments, and make some noise. Accounts are free, and only require an email address.
by BigBlueShoe on May 31, 2008 3:32 PM EDT 0 recs
dumb penalty?
“a played that followed a dumb penalty by Tim Carter”
you mean when Carter faked Jason David out of his shoes so bad that they called a phantom offensive PI call figuring that Carter had to have pushed off? that penalty ruined whatever chance the Giants had at coming back in that game.
but i do agree that despite having better stats, Eli didn’t play as well as his brother that night. Peyton was really on he had a couple of big-time throws that i remember.
as a side note – Tim Carter…
by SBakerTheTouchdownMaker on
May 31, 2008 6:43 PM EDT
up
0 recs
Hey no problem
We’re all entitled to our views. Peyton had a great first half in that game, but when I went back over it, I thought Eli was a little better in the end. You score it 10-9 for your guy, I’ll score it 10-9 for mine. No worries
Nice to see this story pulling in so many outside opinions
Giants fan from the womb to the tomb
by jrs1940 on May 31, 2008 5:50 PM EDT 0 recs
Eli didn't have to outplay his brother in that game.
All the Giants had to do was keep running the ball. The Colts never stopped the running game and we could have kept Peyton off the field for most of the contest had we continued to run it down their thoats. That’s exactly what Parcells would have done.
by giant fan since 57 on May 31, 2008 7:21 PM EDT 0 recs
Who is the real Eli?
All of us who have watched Eli over the past several years have seen flashes of absolute brilliance. We have also seen maddening bouts of bad play.
From game 16 through the super bowl, Eli played brilliantly. Did he truly turn the corner, or did he just get on a roll at the right time? We won’t really know till we see how he opens next year.
Personally, I am not crazy about the “brother” comparison – Yeah, they share some genetic material, but they are different people.
And, QB is only one position – Football – more than any other sport – is a team effort.
by NYERinSF on May 31, 2008 10:58 PM EDT 0 recs
Excellent analysis
I wish there were quantitative data on offensive lines to help explain some of the performance differences. I particularly liked the durability result. Archie played for 11 years, a good career. Simms lasted 14 years. I hope Eli lasts that long.
by TerraByte on Jun 1, 2008 8:38 AM EDT 0 recs
What makes Archie's lasting eleven years even more impressive is that he
took a terrible beating throughout his career. He differed from his sons in one way, though:He was no Steve Young, but he could run if he had to.
by george cronin on Jun 1, 2008 11:39 AM EDT 0 recs
Success
Doesn’t matter how you slice it, both have a Super Bowl ring. We can discuss from sunrise to sunset who is better, and there could be interesting arguments on both sides I’m sure. However, as NYERinSF put it, it’s a team effort ultimately. You could have the best statistical QB in NFL history, and if he had no supporting cast, he probably wouldn’t have a ring. Reminds me of Dan Marino.
I wouldn’t say that Eli is necessarily better than Peyton. But they have the same number of rings. They have both been Super Bowl Champs once. And I remember the Colt’s D playing a substantial role in their SB victory, as well.
We didn't even have a chance for the "perfect season", but we did have the perfect ending.
by GAgiantfan on Jun 1, 2008 3:56 PM EDT 0 recs
"We can discuss from sunrise to sunset who is better"
No we can’t. Peyton is better.
I mean, are you going to tell me that Sinorice Moss is as good a WR as Amani Toomer because they both have one ring?
by JoshNY on
Jun 3, 2008 11:31 AM EDT
up
0 recs
I have to agree
You simply can’t be credible if you try to argue that Eli is - right now - as good as Peyton. All that matters, though, is that eli and the Giants are DEFENDING SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS!!
by ETVal on
Jun 3, 2008 10:56 PM EDT
up
0 recs
niiiiiiiice, thanks Jrs.
Thank you, I appreciate you taking my idea and researching it so thoroughly. So I noticed a couple things, Peyton’s Ihttp://www.bigblueview.com/2008/5/31/542145/mannings-among-men#comments
Mannings Among Men – Big Blue ViewNT #s have gone down consistently since his first season, whereas Eli’s have gone up and his highest number of INTs came last year… but considering in Peyton’s first year he threw 28 INTs (imagine what Colts fans were saying then), I’m not so worried. Not to mention Eli becoming a beast and not throwing an interception in the postseason (the one he had wasn’t his fault, that’s all on Steve Smith for not only failing to catch the ball, but then flipping it up for anyone to pick off). I’ve said all along to my friends who are Giants fans also that Eli just had some growing pains and that when you compared Eli’s stats to Peyton’s stats based on time, they look almost the same… all Peyton has on Eli is consistenly about a 5% higher completion rate, but like you said, when it comes down to who was the better QB as of their fourth year in the NFL, I think that goes to Eli. And also its very important to note who Peyton had on his team vs. who Eli had; Peyton had the advantage as far as WRs go; Eli just won the Super Bowl with his star tight end on IR, plax with a high ankle sprain, a veteran receiver winding down in his years and abilities, a first-year rookie. Regardless of what everyone who hates the Giants says, Eli didn’t “manage” us into a superbowl- he won it for us by playing amazing football. I can’t wait for next season to see Eli play consistently like he did in the postseason ( I hope) but even if he falters, I think he’s won the benefit of the doubt of all Giants fans. The future’s bright boys, we have a Super Bowl MVP franchise QB who is only getting better, and a genius GM.. in jerry reese I trust.
by mahmoodzaky on Jun 2, 2008 1:34 AM EDT 0 recs










