Maybe Goodell isn't such a good guy after all
Roger Goodell enjoyed a tremendous first year as NFL commissioner. He was widely lauded for his tough-guy stance in cleaning up off-the-field behavior, and for taking a draft pick from the New England Patriots in the wake of Spygate.
Goodell was the new sheriff in town, walking tall, carrying a big stick and re-writing the rules to clean up his league's image.
The honeymoon, though, appears to be over.
First, Goodell found himself in the crosshairs of Sen. Arlen Specter after the revelation that Spygate went much deeper than a little taping of the New York Jets' signals. He looks especially bad trying to explain why he arrogantly burned the Spygate evidence.
Now comes an accusation from Kathy Urbanski, wife of Tommy Urbanski, paralyzed in the nightclub shooting incident allegedly sparked by PacMan Jones, that the league has abandoned the Urbanskis despite promises to help them cover their mounting medical costs.
Goodell, of course, was lauded for dealing harshly with Jones, whom he suspended for the 2007 season.
The Urbanskis, though, say the league has refused to help them pay the millions of dollars in medical fees they will accumulate, despite an initial offer of help.
Goodell sounds like a typical heartless, arrogant corporate curmudgeon when he discusses the Urbanskis.
Legally, Goodell is right. He and the NFL don't HAVE to do anything for the Urbanskis.
Yet, morally, he is as far off as he can be, especially if he did initially offer help. Maybe the NFL doesn't owe the Urbanskis anything. Maybe the couple is looking for a rich sugar-daddy to make their financial troubles disappear. Maybe there are bad feelings because the Urbanskis filed a civil suit to get help from the league.
The NFL is, of course, rich beyond imagination. Helping the Urbanskis defray their costs, even footing the entire bill, wouldn't even dent the league's overflowing coffers.
Goodell, though, won't lift a finger. It doesn't directly affect his product, his league's image, his corporate bottom line.
Whether you think the NFL bears any responsibility for Tommy Urbanski's injuries or not, helping that devastated family is the right thing for Goodell to do.
If he doesn't see that, shame on him.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I disagree.
The NFL shouldn't be financially held accountable for their players' conduct off the field, any more than the multi-national company I work for should.
Also, I don't know if I would say Goodell was "widely lauded" for even his initial handling of the Spygate situation. Opinions from the national media seemed 50/50 on that, from my perspective.
I think
by Ed Valentine on Feb 18, 2008 10:40 AM EST up reply actions
Why would you expect Goodell
The growing number of stories of retired NFL players afflicted with lifelong football related injuries and disorders who receive little or no financial assistance from the NFL is sickening. Even worse, is the indifference of Goodell and the NFLPA to their plight. Fortunately, more and more former players - such as ex-Giant great Harry Carson - are working hard to bring this issue into the public eye.
That Goodell and the league won't lift a finger to assist the Urbanskis is disturbing. But that they turn the same blind eye to those to whom they owe so much of their present success is shameful and despicable. Should make every fan think twice before criticizing a player for holding out for that extra million or two when negotiating their contract. From the sound of things, they're going to need every penny of it some day.
Former players
by Ed Valentine on Feb 18, 2008 2:59 PM EST up reply actions
I agree that the NFL
While it's true
This issue has been festering beneath the surface for a long time now. But it's only been in the last year or two that it's really started getting the widespread attention it deserves. So while he may not be the one primarily to blame for the situation, Commissioner Goodell is now the one at the eye of the storm. His failure to publicly acknowledge that the problem even exists is disgraceful.
Yes, it's a difficult problem that will undoubtedly require a costly solution. I know it won't happen overnight. But, at the very least, Goodell needs to step up and do the right thing by both recognizing the contributions made by former players and by giving them his assurance that their concerns will be addressed in a reeal and meaningful way.
Amen!
I watched Bryant Gumbull's Real Sports show last week. It was pitiful to watch an ex Chief and his wife dig through the change jar to try to scrounge up enough money to take him to therapy.
The guy can hardly walk! A fund has to be set up for this!
by giant fan since 57 on Feb 18, 2008 6:03 PM EST reply actions

by 


















