Do the Giants need Burress?
|
| Plaxico Burress |
I am beginning to wonder just how important Plaxico Burress is to this New York Giants football team.
Burress has struggled this season with disciplinary issues, double coverage and now a hamstring injury. Through it all I have continued to believe the Giants needed No. 17 happy, healthy and productive to repeat as Super Bowl champions.
Now, though, there is mounting evidence that the Giants are just fine without him. Thank you very much, Jerry Reese.
Let's break it down.
- The Giants are 10-1, and Burress has not made a truly significant contribution since Week 2. He had 15 of his 35 catches this season after two games.
- In the two games Burress has missed (counting Sunday's one series against Arizona as a missed game) the Giants have scored 44 and 37 points. I know the 44 was against Seattle, but it's still 44 points.
- The emergence of Domenik Hixon, Steve Smith and -- lately -- tight end Kevin Boss means the Giants have loads of weapons even without Burress on the field.
- Two of Eli Manning's best statistical games this season have come without Burress. You can make an argument he is better without Burress because he spreads the ball around more instead of forcing throws and hoping Plax makes a play.
Now, I know darn well that without the gutty, incredible contribution made last season -- playing most of it on one leg -- that the Giants would not be Super Bowl champions.
I know he could be the most talented wide receiver ever to wear a New York Giants' uniform.
I know the Giants paid him a ton of money because they know what kind of weapon he can be.
I know they would rather see him on the field than on the sidelines in a goofy-looking baseball cap.
I know I hope he gets healthy, gets his head screwed on right and makes some huge plays that help the Giants win another Super Bowl.
I am just not sure any more that the Giants absolutely have to have Burress to win another championship.
Your thoughts?
Burress' 2008 stats
0 recs |
61 comments
|
Comments
You hit all the points
You are correct on all of the above, but there is 1 thing we have not seen with Burress out of the lineup: a playoff game. Remember that game Plax had against GB in the NFC Championship game? One of the game’s best CBs couldn’t slow him down at all. In the frigid, windy conditions that the Giants will likely be playing in during the postseason it sure would be nice for Eli to be able to just heave up passes that a healthy Plax can go get over ANY corner. Does that mean we need him to win? Maybe not. But I’d rather not find out.
by potroast on Nov 26, 2008 9:31 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Yes he can do those things
IF he is healthy and IF his head is screwed on right. At this point, those are big questions.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 10:00 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I still think
they are better off with him than without him. He is being double teamed quite a bit, I think part of the problem is having Toomer on the other side, he just can’t shake coverage like he used to. Murfdog referred to him on Sunday as the “Most expensive decoy in the NFL”.
Giants fan from the womb to the tomb
NY Ranger fans talk all things Blueshirts at
http://broadwayblueview.blogspot.com/
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Nov 26, 2008 9:50 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Toomer
still has some life left in him. Not what he used to have, but he still makes his share of plays.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 10:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He is a bad ass...
To bad he lacks character and moral standards.
by badmatty53 on Nov 26, 2008 10:48 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
This talk is foolish
We have already seen what Plax can do. We KNOW that the dude is money in the clutch. It’s easy to wonder about these things now, but come playoff time, Plax will be there and we will all be glad of it. Perhaps after the season we can wonder about this issue, but for now, it the NYG want that second SB ring, we will need EVERY weapon at our disposal, There is a team with stars on their helmets that is getting healthy and focused and I believe will give us BIG time problems from here on out and are looking to be what the NYG were last year. Would you like to take those guys on in the playoffs with no Plax? I think not.
by MJ20 on Nov 26, 2008 10:49 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
The ‘Girls are starting to scare me, since they are the only team in the NFC talented enough to beat the Giants straight up without the Giants beating themselves (granted Dallas beats themselves way more than the Giants do). Having all the weapons we can muster at our disposal is critical. This isn’t going to be easy.
Also, I’ve said this in another thread. It was ONLY 1 year ago that Plax was BOTH dominant & a model citizen. Does everyone really think he can’t get back to that guy already? I still think he can & I don’t think he’s burned enough bridges to write him off yet. We’re not talking about a guy that beat a girl’s head into a bar (Pacman) or killed someone driving drunk here (Little).
by potroast on Nov 26, 2008 11:11 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It seems
That last year he was being a model citizen to get paid. Now that he is paid, it doesn’t look like any sort of model behavior will apply.
He was also not a model citizen if he has accumulated 50+ fines since he’s been on the team.
I have my doubts about Plax.
by Woogie526 on Nov 26, 2008 11:50 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Kind of
I kind of agree with you on the fines because there was so many of them, but they don’t seem to be a problem since the Giants just gave him a big contract. My guess is that Plax missed the start of many meetings where he was supposed to be 10 mins early. Not saying it’s right, but doesn’t seem to be that huge of an issue either.
Good point on the contract year.
by potroast on Nov 26, 2008 12:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We all hope
you are right about Plax in the end.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 11:34 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
One other point
The games without Plax is really not a very good sample. They were against two weak pass defenses and the conditions were excellent. Of course Eli is going to have a great day in those circumstances.
by potroast on Nov 26, 2008 11:21 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I must disagree
First, I think that the Giants would be just fine without Plaxico Burress for the same reason I thought they’d be fine without Jeremy Shockey: They have better (yes, you heard me) weapons available. In addition to the reasons you cited, consider the play against Baltimore where Burress was credited with breaking up a potential interception. One of the replays they showed had the camera on him for most of the play. In that replay, it looked like Manning threw the ball to exactly where he thought Burress would be. However, Burress had quit on his route early, and the great effort was required to get to where he should have been. That’s something that has irritated me for several years: how many of Manning’s interceptions have come on passes intended for Burress and Shockey? If the ball is off-target, they seem to quit, indifferent to the outcome. Other receivers, like Hines Ward, work their butts off to play defensive back on poorly thrown balls.
Second, he doesn’t have the speed anymore to be a number 1 receiver. When was the last time you saw him beat a defensive back deep? I mean, the guy is only averaging 13.0 yards per catch, with a long of just 33 yards. His yards per catch since ’04, his last year with the Steelers: 19.9, 16.0, 15.7, 14.6, 13.0. On a related note, other teams seem to have receivers WIDE OPEN downfield several times each game, ala Kevin Boss this week on his 28 yard gain. How often are Giants receivers that open down the field? For that matter, prior to Amani Toomer’s TD last week, when was the last time you saw a Giants receiver pick up yards after the catch, or break a tackle? I would much rather see Steve Smith, Mario Manningham, and Sinorice Moss run some deep routes, and get a chance to make some plays. They are exciting young players with loads of potential. Let’s face it: gone are the days where Tim Carter and Willie Ponder were next on the depth chart.
Third, he drops too many balls . . . as does the venerable Amani Toomer, as much is it pains me to say. I can only add thru anecdotal evidence that the team seemed to have drops under control for the first 2 months of the season after leading the league last year, but seem to have gotten worse the past few weeks (if anyone has the stats on drops, I’d love to see them). Again, I would love to see what healthy Steve Smith, healthy Mario Manningham, and healthy Sinorice Moss can do (you know, since they’re new to the team).
Finally, the man often disappears in the postseason. He’s been nearly invisible in 4 of his 6 playoff games with the Giants. Sorry, but I’d be more excited than scared if he never suited up again.
brian99
by brian99 on Nov 26, 2008 11:34 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I have never thought Toomer has the dropsies.
That guy bleeds blue
by queler on Nov 26, 2008 9:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree as well
The thing with Plax is that when he steps on the field he INSTANTLY attracts the attention of the other team. The opposing D immediately knows where #17 is lined up and follows where he’s going. Yes, he’s had a tough season – obviously, however, something is going on in his personal life. I think we need him and I think the O is simply incomplete without him. Yeah, there are a lot of weapons out there on the O (Ed, you touched on them above) – but only one of them is a walking double team.
Besides, Coughlin handled the situation perfectly – and TC clearly has the support of the men in the locker room. So long as that continues and Plax doesn’t become a major distraction, he isn’t (and shouldn’t be) going anywhere.
by Cody K on Nov 26, 2008 11:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Cody
I know what Plax brings to the table, and hope he brings it in the playoffs. I am just wondering because the Giants receiving corps has come so far in a year the reliance on Burress doesn’t seem to be there. Steve Smith was hurt most of last year. Hixon is better as a receiver. Boss is getting better all the time. Ward has become part of the passing attack. Shoot, even Sinorice Moss makes plays when given a chance. Last year the Giants didn’t have as many options.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 12:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Eagles
So here’s the thing; I was speaking with a friend of mine last night about the Eagles and their personnel and how they haven’t been the same on Offense since they had TO. And we came to the conclusion that teams really need a stud #1 WR. Because of all of the reasons that we’ve discussed here; it attracts a double team, it forces the opposing D to move the S off the line, which opens up the run game and opens routes for the other WR’s etc.
And I think this rings true in the NFL. You need that stud #1 WR to attract the D’s attention and force them to cover the guy.
Thankfully for the Giants, Plax is NOWHERE NEAR the distraction that TO is/was (at least when he was on the Eagles).
But he’s a supreme talent and I think to insinuate that we might be better off without him is unfair. With Shockey, I think it was clear that the team played better without him there. But with Plax, its more nuanced. He and Eli seem to have a great rapport (evidenced by the TD combos over the past few seasons) and he’s such a great downfield blocker and an incredible physical specimen that I think he just makes the team THAT much better.
So can the GMen win without Plax? Yeah, probably in most games. But are they a dynasty team, a “Super Bowl” capable team without him? I don’t think so.
by Cody K on Nov 26, 2008 12:43 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Thank you, Cody.
Thank you. It’s so nice to read a post by a Giant fan who “gets it.”
In addition to all of the ways Plax has helped this team win football games (that I allude to in my post below), I can’t recall him ever holding a postgame press conference in which he threw his coaches and teammates under the bus. I have never seen him publicly show up his QB the way TO has or in the way that Shockey used to do to Eli on a regular basis.
Except for a few mis-steps (which Coughlin has swiftly dealt with) the guy has been a model teammate. Yet, people continue to labor under the misapprehension that he has some kind of
serious attitude problem. Maybe it’s because he has a style and appearance that make people think he is the NFL’s version of Allen Iverson. But I’d hope people would be able to look beyond such superficialities and recall – as Ed does in his post – that here was a guy who played through an entire season last year on one freakin’ leg. Yeah, he could have easily shut it down and no one would have blamed him. But, no, the player that Giant fans are now casually dismissing as a “dog” and a “head case” chose to gut it out, put the team on his back (especially in the NFC Championship in which he undressed one of the league’s top CBs, Al Harris) and carry them to the Super Bowl.
This is NOT a problem player whose attitude is sinking the team.
by knickfan on Nov 26, 2008 1:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think Cody has summed it up beautifully
Also, I’m kind of shocked that there are a lot of people here that think Plax is not the most talented receiver on the Giants. Listen I love Hixon and the rest, but this is not even close. Plax is not a weapon because of his speed, he’s the weapon he is because of his size and athleticism. There are only a few receivers in the NFL with this kind of combination and he’s not only the most talented receiver, I think he’s 1 of the 2 most talented players on the team (Tuck).
by potroast on Nov 26, 2008 2:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Funny....
…how there is almost two camps on this? Very little middle ground it seems.
by Cody K on Nov 26, 2008 2:32 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I think we need
to get ‘knickfan’ and ‘brian99’ some gloves and let ’em have at it, MMA style. LOL!!
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 2:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i don't know
I’m somewhat indifferent.. If the Giants traded him for a sweet draft pick.. awesome but if they kept him that’s just swell too..
by Hoyadestroya85 on Nov 26, 2008 3:11 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wow, Brian 99
You’ve made the extreme case against and pot has made the extreme case for Plax. I accept some of what pot says but embrace much more the case you’ve laid out. To me, Plax’s biggest problem seems to be that he’s a head case. It’s demonstrated by his selective effort on the field and most vividly by the fact that he’s hurting himself by causing suspensions that prevent him from activating the incentives in his contract. How do you reach a guy like that? God knows, management has persistently tried and seems to have failed so far. If things keep going the way they have, he’ll be worthless to the team even as trade bait.
by george cronin on Nov 26, 2008 11:52 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
George
This is why Burress is so confounding. He can be great, he can be terrible. He can give incredible effort, he can go in the tank. He can try to lead, as he did last year, or he can choose to do whatever the hell he wants, as is the case this year.
It’s maddening. I’d love to see the guy pull it together, get healthy and catch another game-winning pass in the Super Bowl. I just wonder if he will.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 11:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Double Teams
Yes, he attracts double teams. But the truly great, playmaking, #1 receivers continue to be productive despite them.
brian99
by brian99 on Nov 26, 2008 12:01 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This was a silly post
It seems I’ve been defending Plax all season long to Giant fans and I’m getting pretty weary of it. At this point, I could write a book on the topic but I’ll keep this pretty short.
For starters, whenever Plax is on the field, opposing defensive coordinators have to account for his presence at all times. That usually means a safety over the top in addition to the corner that’s assigned to cover him. Now, we saw what this meant in the Cardinal game when the absence of Plax allowed Pendergast to put that that safety in the box. In fact, I’m convinced that the Giants’ relative lack of success running the ball on Sunday was due to more to Plax’ absence than to Jacobs’. Hixon is a nice player and a more than capable replacement for Plax when he is out. But there ain’t no defensive coordinators staying up late at night trying to figure out ways to stop Hixon in the way they have to do with Plax.
But what really chaps my hide is all this talk about how Plax is somehow “dogging it” this year because his numbers are down. To those who say that, I can only ask “What games are you watching?” On numerous occasions this season, Plax has made some huge downfield blocks on running plays. I’d even say that he’s far and away the Giants best blocking WR. He’s also a very smart player who’s always looking to get an edge any way he can. For example, there was that great play in the Sunday night game against the Eagles where he extended a drive by convincing the official to throw an illegal contact flag on Asante Samuel after pulling a flop that would have made Ginobli green with envy. It’s sad that many of today’s football fans are unable to look beyond the fantasy football mindset in which a player is judged solely by his stats.
Now, I’m aware of the argument that Plax should not be getting elite WR money to serve as a decoy or a downfield blocker. But you know what? That’s a business decision that’s best made by Reese, TC and the Giants, and not by a fan who evaluates player through the prism of fantasy football. And something tells me that the Giant coaches and front office know exactly how valuable Plax has been to this team’ success, even with his receiving numbers as depressed as they are. I don’t think he’s going anywhere unless some team makes Reese an offer that completely knocks his socks off.
by knickfan on Nov 26, 2008 12:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Silly post?
I really tried not to take sides. I tried to just lay out the argument, ask the question and let people have at it. It seems to have stirred up a lot of feelings. Which means it’s not a silly post at all. It did exactly what I hoped it would do — started a good debate with lots of feelings on both sides.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 1:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This IS a great post.
There are many many opinions on this one, to be sure. Ed, you and I seem to fall on different sides of the fence on this one, but clearly it elicits some pretty significant feelings on the matter and that’s what smart people getting together and talking NYG football is all about.
by Cody K on Nov 26, 2008 1:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
as long as we can all do it without getting bitter and becoming nasty, then it’s all good. We all want the same thing — another Super Bowl title.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 2:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
With all due respect, Ed
When you write something along the lines of:
I know I hope he gets healthy, gets his head screwed on right and makes some huge plays that help the Giants win another Super Bowl.
I am just not sure any more that the Giants absolutely have to have Burress to win another championship.
You are doing more than simply “laying out the argument,” there. You are pretty much saying that Plax’ head isn’t screwed on right and that he hasn’t been making plays that will help the Giants win another Super Bowl.
What I’ve been arguing to Giant fans all year is that Plax is pretty much the same guy he was last year. Just because he is a different kind of cat who marches to the beat of his own drummer (as he did last year) does not make him a “head case.” His commitment to the team and to winning football games remains unquestioned. And I don’t think the Giants are 10-1 without him. Given the enormous amount of attention he demands from defenses, he has opened up options for Eli and Gilbride that just would not be possible if he were no longer a Giant. So, yes, he’s also been instrumental in helping the Giants along the path to another Super Bowl.
Ed, I am a regular visitor to your blog and usually find your posts spot on but I think you missed the boat on this one. Whether intentional or not, your language did insinuate that Plax has contributed little to the Giants’ success this year and that his head hasn’t been in the game. That his receiving numbers are way down is beyond dispute. But it irks me that people are pointing to that – and not to many other great things he does on the football field – as evidence that he has somehow outlived his usefulness to the team.
by knickfan on Nov 26, 2008 1:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So, are you telling me
that his head HAS been screwed on right and that he HAS been making plays to help the Giants? I haven’t seen them. I think it is brutally obvious he has not been the same player this season that he was last year. The question, which I did not take sides on, is whether or not the Giants need last year’s Plax to win another Super Bowl, or whether they can do it without him. I used to fully believe they needed Plax at 100 % to win it all. I am just not sure at this point.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 2:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I am saying that
“his head HAS been screwed on right and that he HAS been making plays to help the Giants” as I tried to spell out in my post up top.
by knickfan on Nov 26, 2008 2:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
while I agree
with your general premise, that the Plax thing is overblown and he’s still a very important part of this team, I have to disagree that he’s still the same player as he was last year. Yes, he does a lot of things that help the Giants win beyond catching 80+ passes and 10+ TDs a year, but the fact is that he was more valuable to the Giants last year when he was doing that. He was facing the same double coverage last year, but he still managed to be a top-shelf receiver. This year, he’s clearly taken a step back. Either he’s lost a step or it’s something else, and I’m not really sure which it is. Either way though, I still love Plax, and no matter what happens with him from this point out, I have faith in Reese and Coughlin to do the right thing, and I will never forget the contribution Plax made to the most enjoyable Giants season of my life (referring to last year, of course)
by cjmulrain on Nov 26, 2008 2:28 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well said, cj.
JR and TC know the situation and all its ramifications better than us bloviators. Whatever they decide is okay with me. They’ve earned that respect.
by george cronin on Nov 26, 2008 3:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bloviators
George, you’ve done it again. BTW, I do agree with your point. TC and JR will do the right thing.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 4:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
he actually wasn't double covered too much
Especially at GB, that’s why he dominated them. NE doubled him except for one play. It’s not just safety help, they HAVE to bracket him to prevent the curl-go-option that anihilated green bay. That takes that safety completely out of run support. This year he’s been doubled. I understand he’s bored, and i can live it with as long as he draws the double. I just want see him dominate when they pull the safety. i think this will happen soon if Jacobs keeps killing people.
by queler on Nov 26, 2008 9:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I appreciate your opinion
but it seems we are not watching the same games. I want Plax to be the player he was last season, but I’m just not seeing it so far this year.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 2:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's impossible to make a diagnosis from afar,
but Plax does exhibit at least some of the characteristics of ODD (Oppositoinal Defiant Disorder)
You’ve said it yourself—marching to a different drummer (sic.) Not the kind of behavior you seek in football, the ultimate team sport and certainly not the kind Old School TC demands.
by george cronin on Nov 26, 2008 3:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This time last year...
Whouda thunk we’d be sitting here with a chance to win our 2nd straight Super Bowl and Jeremy Shockey and Plaxico Burress would have very little impact on that?
by Sean Keeley on Nov 26, 2008 12:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
this is a tough one
I enjoy plax though.. he’s way more valuable than catches etc.
by Hoyadestroya85 on Nov 26, 2008 12:41 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Big Blue View
Now serving a can of worms…..
Giants fan from the womb to the tomb
NY Ranger fans talk all things Blueshirts at
http://broadwayblueview.blogspot.com/
by Jim Schmiedeberg on Nov 26, 2008 12:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Instead of
Thanksgiving cranberries. LOL!! Seems to me this stirred up the best debate we have had in a while.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 1:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What am I thankful for?
Good lively debate on BBV.
Really there hasn’t been much for us to debate amongst ourselves lately with this team. I’m also thankful for that.
by potroast on Nov 26, 2008 2:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
This has actually been fun. I love having the best team in the NFL, that is the dream. It hasn’t left us much of substance to debate, though. So, this has been good.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 3:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Plax Out----No Way
He doesn’t have catches because he soaks up defenders in the secondary. His presence alone opens so many avenues of options for Manning. He is something teams spend time talking about and planning for. He is a magnet for the elite cover players. Beside, he adds swagger to the character of this team.
by johnd134 on Nov 26, 2008 3:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
What happens when
Eli forces a ball into double coverage and Plax gives up on the play and it’s an INT. Then we crucify Eli.
Plax should be up for equal criticism. He has not been on the same page with the offense since his 1 game suspension. And I believe that is a detriment to the team.
by Woogie526 on Nov 26, 2008 3:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ed, Ed ,Ed....
I knew from past posts this one would be coming and am still not sure of the right response so i’ll go with the “gut” reaction.
1) You wouldn’t even have posted this if it wasn’t just maddening(sickening?) knowing his talent based on last year, we all remember GB ,his finest moment. You remind me at the moment who loudly voices “I DON’T CARE!”but are saying so because you do.
2) I vividly remember George Young during the mid 80’s in an interview stating that on a 49 man roster you have room for one or two loose screws(he didn’t mention LT by name) but, they have to be pretty darned good to make concessions for them. To me Burres may be a loose screw but, he’s OUR loose screw. He CAN be that dominant force we remember from the GB game but for whatever reason isn’t there yet.
Let’s put Burress head on the Giants for a moment…………….HIRE A PSYCHIATRIST!!!!
FIGURE OUT WHAT ’S THE RIGHT BUTTON AND GIVE IT A PUSH!!!
This team has the luxury of a developing Hixon and Moss is starting to catch a few but, why give up out of frustration now. Eventually a challenge will present itself and OUR loose screw will answer the bell………..I hope.
We're only gonna score 17 points?
by big blue wrecking crew on Nov 26, 2008 3:51 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I hope he does
answer that bell. It would make all this talk go away, and might help the Giants win another Super Bowl. As I’ve said in other comments, I tried not to take sides — just raise the point that it’s not as clear-cut as it used to be. From the amount of discussion, I think I hit the mark.
by Ed Valentine on Nov 26, 2008 4:44 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Do the Giants NEED Plax?
That was your question, Ed. We don’t have to delve into the inticacies of Plax’s game or psyche to answer it. The Ginats don’t need him. No one player is “needed” by the team, with the possible exception of Eli. Would all fans like to see him live up to his full potential? Yes. Has he? I think not. This discussion is eerily reminiscent of those early discussions concerning Shockey’s value to the team. Had he gotten his act together, he’d still be a Giant. Plax’s future with the team is opaque. What has been going on doesn’t augur well, but he hasn’t become the distraction Shock became. If he goes out and gives his all on every play (like his team mates) what Giants fan would not want to see him on the field for years to come? If his performance for the rest of the season matches what has transpired to date, how many BBVersd would complain if he was gone?
Apparently, quite a few.
by george cronin on Nov 26, 2008 6:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Bulls eye for sure!
We're only gonna score 17 points?
by big blue wrecking crew on Nov 27, 2008 7:10 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
thats a great point
You can have those guys as long as they aren’t distractions. And why he may be distracting to us the fan, from what I hear from the team, I don’t think he’s distracting them other then reporters asking them about him. Take Shockey, he was always jawing at Eli about getting the ball. I haven’t seen him complaining. I really think he’s just bored being a decoy. But it looks like 90% of the time, he’s got an acceptable attitude.
by queler on Nov 26, 2008 9:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I just have one thing to add in all this:
we all have an opinion on this subject. I personally think that there is a list of things mr. Buress needs to improve on regardless of double teams, etc. And that when he does it will be hugely beneficial to the team.
But let us not forget that coach Coughlin, Jerry Reese and the boys in the locker room know this situation far better than we do. The best thing we can do as fans is the same thing our players did to win that superbowl title. Continue supporting the team. I think that support shows through in spades on this site.
gentlemen: in Reese we trust.
by NYcON on Nov 26, 2008 3:52 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
This whole debate
is very reminiscent of the ongoing debate as to whether or not Eli is an elite QB.
There are people who still point to, say, Romo’s stats and cite the fact that he has higher QB rating, passes for more yards and TDs as “evidence” that he is Eli’s superior. But those of us who watch Eli on a regular basis understand there are many other important things that Eli does (and Romo does not) that you’ll never see reflected in the stats. These things are no less impressive than a 70 yard TD bomb – things like drawing the Raven defenders offsides on two consecutive hard counts; or convincing TC to challenge that crucial illegal forward pass penalty against the Eagles; or any of the innumerable other “intangibles” that Eli Manning brings to the winning of football games week after week.
Now, it’s easy for us to notice these things because those of us who watch the Giants focus on Eli every offensive down. We don’t give anywhere near the same amount of attention to what the wide receiver is doing on those plays where he doesn’t have the ball in his hands. But my whole contention throughout this whole thread has been that Plax is every bit the student of the game that Eli is and similarly exhibits those critical “intangibles” that don’t show up in the box score. I cited a few of them upthread and won’t bother to repeat them here. But the bottom line is this: To downgrade Plax’ contribution based solely on his stats is as absurd as belittling Eli because his passing numbers aren’t as gaudy as Tony Romo’s or Kurt Warner’s.
by knickfan on Nov 26, 2008 4:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Wow....
Well, here’s my take on Plaxico. Though I have said in the past that we seem to be a more balanced team without him as the dominant receiver, and on the other hand agree with a lot of what knickfan says, we now have so much talent at wide receiver that it is damn near impossible for our opponents to prepare a game plan against us because we can bring it six different ways through the air.
But as good as all our receivers are, Plaxico is the biggest play maker, the guy who can reach up two stories to grab a pass that looks way to high to catch, the guy who always attracts two defenders, and, in my opinion, is the best downfield blockers of our wide outs.
It’s hard to give up on a guy like that. I think (and hope)Coughlin will find a way to make it all work.
by giant fan since 57 on Nov 26, 2008 6:14 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
does any team..
need a 6’4" receiver who you can simply lobb the ball in the vicinity of to get a completion? yeah, of course. he’s having a little T.O. bitch- syndrome, where he gets frustrated when he doesn’t get the ball alot, meaning he doesn’t have the team-first mentality thats become so important to putting up those Ws, but especially as we gear up for the playoffs i do NOT see him quitting on routes or pulling any of the BS he’s been pulling recently, because whether its for the team or for himself he wants rings and he wants to be one of the top receivers in the league. It personally enrages him that he’s not mentioned with names like roy “E” williams, TO, randy moss, anquan boldin, etc, because he does have the talent of all those guys if not more (with the exception of randy moss… reference, one-handed grab on the sidelines against the dolphins this sunday… jesus).
more logistically, why do you really need a plaxico burress on this team? because you can mismatch him against short corners like ellis hobbs, ronde barber, etc, get them to pull a safety on him, and that opens up those 3rd down along the seam routes for guys like steve smith.. when the safety is back playing cover 3 on plax trying not to give up the big deep pass that we alll know he can bring down. this guy is a HUGE asset to the team, whether the ball is in his hands or not.
on another note, goddammit green bay, don’t you know that when ur secondary takes three vicodins before the game and gives up 415 passing yards and 51 points that ur hurting our draft picks!!
by mahmoodzaky on Nov 26, 2008 8:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
important, not indispensable
The Giants are a deep, talented team – No single player is indispensable (perhaps Manning is the exception)
Look at the players that this team has lost over the last couple of years – Tiki, Shockey, Strahan – and yet they keep rolling
OTOH – at some point, you lose enough depth and the team does suffer. Plax is a very talented player, when he and Eli got onto the same page last year, he did really great things.
Could the team win a championship without him? Yes, but it is less likely
by NYERinSF on Nov 27, 2008 12:58 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Another exception
I don’t think that they could win it all this year without Jacobs
by NYERinSF on Nov 27, 2008 12:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
now we really don't need him lol
Plaxico accidentally shot himself in the leg last night.
( http://www.newsday.com/sports/football/giants/ny-spplax1130,0,2537752.story )
I would venture to guess that his NFL career is finished.
by nygiants on Nov 29, 2008 12:37 PM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 






















